Samsung Galaxy S8+ (Plus, SM-G955F) Smartphone rövid értékelés

Name: Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Brand: Samsung

Galaktikus stréber. A Samsung nem kötött kompromisszumokat okostelefon zászlóvivője, a Galaxy S8+ (Plus) esetében, rengeteg csúcstechnológiás funkcióval szerelte fel azt. Ezen kívül kiváló kijelzővel, amelynek kicsit más a képaránya. A telefon dizájnja is kellemes. Nem sok rosszat tudunk mondani a koreai kompakt phabletről.

Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Manuel Masiero (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 04/21/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen Galaxy S

Test device courtesy of Samsung Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)	532 MBit/s ∼100% +45%
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	515 MBit/s ∼97% +40%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	368 MBit/s ∼69%
LG G6 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	325 MBit/s ∼61% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	281 MBit/s ∼53% -24%
Huawei Mate 9 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	259 MBit/s ∼49% -30%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	656 MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)	485 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	435 MBit/s ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	335 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
LG G6 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	220 MBit/s ∼34% -66%
Huawei Mate 9 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	165 MBit/s ∼25% -75%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S8+

LG G6

Huawei Mate 9

Canon EOS 70D (Szenenautomatik)

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S8+

LG G6

Huawei Mate 9

Canon EOS 70D (Szenenautomatik)

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S8+

LG G6

Huawei Mate 9

Canon EOS 70D (Szenenautomatik)


539 cd/m²	561 cd/m²	571 cd/m²
555 cd/m²	560 cd/m²	569 cd/m²
561 cd/m²	561 cd/m²	577 cd/m²

Fényerő megoszlás

Infinity Display, Corning Gorilla Glas 5

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 577 cd/m² Átlag: 561.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.72 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 93 %
Centrumban: 560 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.87% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 81.57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.13

ICC Fájl (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.20	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50	Huawei Mate 9 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.90	Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50	Google Pixel XL 2016 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50	Lenovo Moto Z AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50	HTC U Ultra SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.70
Screen		1%	-81%	3%	-83%	-21%	-149%
Brightness middle	560	554 -1%	696 24%	557 -1%	402 -28%	485 -13%	470 -16%
Brightness	562	552 -2%	680 21%	553 -2%	408 -27%	490 -13%	445 -21%
Brightness Distribution	93	96 3%	93 0%	97 4%	85 -9%	92 -1%	88 -5%
Black Level *			0.42	0.35			0.22
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	1.7	1.59 6%	4.3 -153%	1.4 18%	4 -135%	2.1 -24%	5.5 -224%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	3.4	2.56 25%	9.4 -176%	3.1 9%	10.1 -197%	5.5 -62%	11.9 -250%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	1.6	2.01 -26%	4.8 -200%	1.3 19%	3.2 -100%	2.6 -63%	7.6 -375%
Gamma	2.13 ^103%	2.01 ^109%	2.33 ^94%	2.21 ^100%	2.19 ^100%	2.23 ^99%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6435 ^101%	6321 ^103%	7255 ^90%	6667 ^97%	7037 ^92%	6843 ^95%	7454 ^87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	81.57	82.12 1%		63.1 -23%		88.14 8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	99.87	99.98 0%		99.83 0%		100 0%
Contrast			1657	1591			2136

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

250 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9704 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.8 ms rise
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.5 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	165382 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	128749 Points ∼44% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ	129317 Points ∼44% -22%
HTC U Ultra	139017 Points ∼47% -16%
LG G6	151751 Points ∼52% -8%
Google Pixel XL 2016	138641 Points ∼47% -16%
Lenovo Moto Z	129197 Points ∼44% -22%
Huawei Mate 9	124087 Points ∼42% -25%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	165399 Points ∼56% 0%

Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	6695 Points ∼11%
LG G6	4369 Points ∼7% -35%
Huawei Mate 9	6445 Points ∼10% -4%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2015 Points ∼25%
LG G6	1831 Points ∼22% -9%
Huawei Mate 9	1866 Points ∼23% -7%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	6375 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	5503 Points ∼13% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ	3701 Points ∼9% -42%
HTC U Ultra	3983 Points ∼10% -38%
Google Pixel XL 2016	4167 Points ∼10% -35%
Lenovo Moto Z	3946 Points ∼10% -38%
Huawei Mate 9	5629 Points ∼14% -12%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	5630 Points ∼14% -12%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	1952 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	1840 Points ∼28% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ	1647 Points ∼25% -16%
HTC U Ultra	1643 Points ∼25% -16%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1513 Points ∼23% -22%
Lenovo Moto Z	1480 Points ∼23% -24%
Huawei Mate 9	1947 Points ∼30% 0%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3476 Points ∼54% +78%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	1280 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	733 Points ∼13% -43%
LG G6	647 Points ∼11% -49%
Google Pixel XL 2016	621 Points ∼11% -51%
Lenovo Moto Z	542 Points ∼9% -58%
Huawei Mate 9	699 Points ∼12% -45%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1177 Points ∼21% -8%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2512 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	1811 Points ∼23% -28%
Sony Xperia XZ	1613 Points ∼20% -36%
HTC U Ultra	1837 Points ∼23% -27%
LG G6	2065 Points ∼26% -18%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2044 Points ∼26% -19%
Lenovo Moto Z	1813 Points ∼23% -28%
Huawei Mate 9	1997 Points ∼25% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3571 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2394 Points ∼19% -33%
Sony Xperia XZ	3144 Points ∼25% -12%
HTC U Ultra	2678 Points ∼21% -25%
LG G6	3117 Points ∼25% -13%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2863 Points ∼23% -20%
Lenovo Moto Z	2588 Points ∼21% -28%
Huawei Mate 9	2142 Points ∼17% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3265 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2234 Points ∼23% -32%
Sony Xperia XZ	2596 Points ∼27% -20%
HTC U Ultra	2431 Points ∼25% -26%
LG G6	2800 Points ∼29% -14%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2629 Points ∼27% -19%
Lenovo Moto Z	2363 Points ∼25% -28%
Huawei Mate 9	2108 Points ∼22% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	1816 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	1773 Points ∼31% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ	1516 Points ∼26% -17%
HTC U Ultra	1666 Points ∼29% -8%
LG G6	2058 Points ∼36% +13%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2009 Points ∼35% +11%
Lenovo Moto Z	1860 Points ∼32% +2%
Huawei Mate 9	2104 Points ∼36% +16%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1528 Points ∼27% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	4137 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	3071 Points ∼11% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ	4333 Points ∼15% +5%
HTC U Ultra	3795 Points ∼13% -8%
LG G6	5006 Points ∼17% +21%
Google Pixel XL 2016	4406 Points ∼15% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z	3930 Points ∼14% -5%
Huawei Mate 9	2421 Points ∼8% -41%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	5141 Points ∼18% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3222 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2641 Points ∼20% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ	3152 Points ∼23% -2%
HTC U Ultra	3001 Points ∼22% -7%
LG G6	3797 Points ∼28% +18%
Google Pixel XL 2016	3483 Points ∼26% +8%
Lenovo Moto Z	3151 Points ∼23% -2%
Huawei Mate 9	2343 Points ∼17% -27%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3371 Points ∼25% +5%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	104 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	81 fps ∼1% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ	88 fps ∼1% -15%
HTC U Ultra	74 fps ∼1% -29%
LG G6	75 fps ∼1% -28%
Google Pixel XL 2016	91 fps ∼1% -12%
Lenovo Moto Z	77 fps ∼1% -26%
Huawei Mate 9	80 fps ∼1% -23%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	91.96 fps ∼1% -12%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	58 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	51 fps ∼2% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ	88 fps ∼3% +52%
HTC U Ultra	46 fps ∼1% -21%
LG G6	46 fps ∼1% -21%
Google Pixel XL 2016	55 fps ∼2% -5%
Lenovo Moto Z	53 fps ∼2% -9%
Huawei Mate 9	60 fps ∼2% +3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	57.71 fps ∼2% 0%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	50 fps ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	38 fps ∼4% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ	40 fps ∼4% -20%
HTC U Ultra	26 fps ∼3% -48%
LG G6	38 fps ∼4% -24%
Google Pixel XL 2016	48 fps ∼5% -4%
Lenovo Moto Z	41 fps ∼4% -18%
Huawei Mate 9	34 fps ∼4% -32%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	58.71 fps ∼6% +17%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	38 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	27 fps ∼7% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ	39 fps ∼11% +3%
HTC U Ultra	23 fps ∼6% -39%
LG G6	27 fps ∼7% -29%
Google Pixel XL 2016	30 fps ∼8% -21%
Lenovo Moto Z	26 fps ∼7% -32%
Huawei Mate 9	37 fps ∼10% -3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	55.17 fps ∼15% +45%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	42 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28 fps ∼1% -33%
Sony Xperia XZ	31 fps ∼1% -26%
HTC U Ultra	12 fps ∼0% -71%
LG G6	29 fps ∼1% -31%
Google Pixel XL 2016	32 fps ∼1% -24%
Lenovo Moto Z	27 fps ∼1% -36%
Huawei Mate 9	24 fps ∼1% -43%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	41.3 fps ∼1% -2%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	23 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps ∼0% -35%
Sony Xperia XZ	31 fps ∼1% +35%
HTC U Ultra	12 fps ∼0% -48%
LG G6	16 fps ∼0% -30%
Google Pixel XL 2016	17 fps ∼0% -26%
Lenovo Moto Z	15 fps ∼0% -35%
Huawei Mate 9	28 fps ∼1% +22%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	41.5 fps ∼1% +80%

GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	25 fps ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps ∼3% -40%
Sony Xperia XZ	20 fps ∼5% -20%
HTC U Ultra	15 fps ∼3% -40%
LG G6	20 fps ∼5% -20%
Google Pixel XL 2016	19 fps ∼4% -24%
Lenovo Moto Z	16 fps ∼4% -36%
Huawei Mate 9	fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	13 fps ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	7.9 fps ∼3% -39%
Sony Xperia XZ	19 fps ∼7% +46%
HTC U Ultra	8.4 fps ∼3% -35%
LG G6	11 fps ∼4% -15%
Google Pixel XL 2016	11 fps ∼4% -15%
Lenovo Moto Z	9.8 fps ∼4% -25%
Huawei Mate 9	14 fps ∼5% +8%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	5195 Points ∼34%
Sony Xperia XZ	5616 Points ∼37% +8%
HTC U Ultra	5217 Points ∼34% 0%
LG G6	5152 Points ∼34% -1%
Huawei Mate 9	6299 Points ∼41% +21%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	5830 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4660 Points ∼23% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ	5058 Points ∼25% -13%
HTC U Ultra	5217 Points ∼26% -11%
LG G6	5703 Points ∼29% -2%
Google Pixel XL 2016	4739 Points ∼24% -19%
Lenovo Moto Z	7637 Points ∼38% +31%
Huawei Mate 9	7403 Points ∼37% +27%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	1163 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	994 Points ∼46% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ	1066 Points ∼49% -8%
HTC U Ultra	907 Points ∼42% -22%
LG G6	1073 Points ∼49% -8%
Google Pixel XL 2016	977 Points ∼45% -16%
Lenovo Moto Z	959 Points ∼44% -18%
Huawei Mate 9	1076 Points ∼50% -7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1542 Points ∼71% +33%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	6126 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2203 Points ∼8% -64%
Sony Xperia XZ	4716 Points ∼16% -23%
HTC U Ultra	4591 Points ∼16% -25%
LG G6	5138 Points ∼18% -16%
Google Pixel XL 2016	5017 Points ∼17% -18%
Lenovo Moto Z	4321 Points ∼15% -29%
Huawei Mate 9	3939 Points ∼14% -36%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	6875 Points ∼24% +12%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3135 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2072 Points ∼23% -34%
Sony Xperia XZ	1434 Points ∼16% -54%
HTC U Ultra	1581 Points ∼17% -50%
LG G6	1930 Points ∼21% -38%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1677 Points ∼19% -47%
Lenovo Moto Z	2190 Points ∼24% -30%
Huawei Mate 9	3850 Points ∼43% +23%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1319 Points ∼15% -58%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	5319 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4080 Points ∼25% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ	3047 Points ∼19% -43%
HTC U Ultra	2834 Points ∼17% -47%
LG G6	3646 Points ∼22% -31%
Google Pixel XL 2016	3889 Points ∼24% -27%
Lenovo Moto Z	3398 Points ∼21% -36%
Huawei Mate 9	3616 Points ∼22% -32%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	6582 Points ∼40% +24%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3301 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2074 Points ∼25% -37%
Sony Xperia XZ	2165 Points ∼26% -34%
HTC U Ultra	2078 Points ∼25% -37%
LG G6	2496 Points ∼30% -24%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2378 Points ∼28% -28%
Lenovo Moto Z	2356 Points ∼28% -29%
Huawei Mate 9	2772 Points ∼33% -16%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3097 Points ∼37% -6%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	25.06 fps ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	13.31 fps ∼34% -47%
LG G6	24.34 fps ∼63% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z	24.33 fps ∼63% -3%
Huawei Mate 9	19.14 fps ∼49% -24%

PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
3D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2573 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2131 Points ∼8% -17%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2189 Points ∼8% -15%
Lenovo Moto Z	2461 Points ∼9% -4%
Huawei Mate 9	1921 Points ∼7% -25%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	2017 Points ∼7% -22%
2D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	7552 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	6382 Points ∼13% -15%
Google Pixel XL 2016	6042 Points ∼13% -20%
Lenovo Moto Z	4781 Points ∼10% -37%
Huawei Mate 9	10255 Points ∼22% +36%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	5495 Points ∼12% -27%
Memory Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	9844 Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	6136 Points ∼0% -38%
Google Pixel XL 2016	9673 Points ∼0% -2%
Lenovo Moto Z	8912 Points ∼0% -9%
Huawei Mate 9	14580 Points ∼0% +48%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	25299 Points ∼0% +157%
Disk Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	92548 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	36364 Points ∼18% -61%
Google Pixel XL 2016	44706 Points ∼22% -52%
Lenovo Moto Z	68378 Points ∼34% -26%
Huawei Mate 9	117939 Points ∼59% +27%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	48907 Points ∼25% -47%
CPU Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	238041 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	225427 Points ∼30% -5%
Google Pixel XL 2016	215105 Points ∼28% -10%
Lenovo Moto Z	170521 Points ∼22% -28%
Huawei Mate 9	256749 Points ∼34% +8%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	49294 Points ∼6% -79%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	10342 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	8049 Points ∼24% -22%
Google Pixel XL 2016	8766 Points ∼26% -15%
Lenovo Moto Z	8795 Points ∼26% -15%
Huawei Mate 9	9449 Points ∼28% -9%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	8420 Points ∼25% -19%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash

LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Google Pixel XL 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe

WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1 | Vellamo 3.x | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	154 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	163 Points ∼20% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ	90 Points ∼11% -42%
LG G6	122 Points ∼15% -21%
Google Pixel XL 2016	126 Points ∼16% -18%
Lenovo Moto Z	112 Points ∼14% -27%
Huawei Mate 9	152 Points ∼19% -1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	204 Points ∼25% +32%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	62.198 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	75.12 Points ∼19% +21%
Sony Xperia XZ	54.201 Points ∼13% -13%
HTC U Ultra	45.084 Points ∼11% -28%
LG G6	56.628 Points ∼14% -9%
Google Pixel XL 2016	55.4 Points ∼14% -11%
Lenovo Moto Z	47.5 Points ∼12% -24%
Huawei Mate 9	68.6 Points ∼17% +10%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	168.08 Points ∼42% +170%

Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	7466 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	7198 (6255^min) Points ∼95% -4%
LG G6	6032 Points ∼80% -19%
Google Pixel XL 2016	6271 Points ∼83% -16%
Lenovo Moto Z	5344 Points ∼71% -28%
Huawei Mate 9	7565 Points ∼100% +1%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	14050 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	13191 Points ∼20% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ	9069 Points ∼14% -35%
HTC U Ultra	5511 Points ∼8% -61%
LG G6	9113 Points ∼14% -35%
Google Pixel XL 2016	8690 Points ∼13% -38%
Lenovo Moto Z	7771 Points ∼12% -45%
Huawei Mate 9	11897 Points ∼18% -15%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	26053 Points ∼39% +85%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2236.7 ms * ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2564.1 ms * ∼4% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ	2768 ms * ∼5% -24%
HTC U Ultra	4141 ms * ∼7% -85%
LG G6	2464.2 ms * ∼4% -10%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2653.6 ms * ∼4% -19%
Lenovo Moto Z	3154.7 ms * ∼5% -41%
Huawei Mate 9	2733.7 ms * ∼5% -22%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1102.7 ms * ∼2% +51%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	Sony Xperia XZ	HTC U Ultra	Google Pixel XL 2016	Lenovo Moto Z	Huawei Mate 9	Apple iPhone 7 Plus
AndroBench 3-5		-16%	-45%	-12%	-40%	53%	-32%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	57.24	50.36 -12%	29.8 -48%	67.6 18%		45.64 -20%	29.53 -48%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	71.12	76.43 7%	33.5 -53%	82.8 16%		78.51 10%	53.97 -24%
Random Write 4KB	15.27	15.79 3%	10.5 -31%	13.7 -10%	14.56 -5%	74.93 391%	8.77 -43%
Random Read 4KB	127.18	86.71 -32%	71.5 -44%	84.2 -34%	87.67 -31%	117.15 -8%	94.69 -26%
Sequential Write 256KB	194.18	145.11 -25%	138 -29%	164.7 -15%	83.38 -57%	168.32 -13%	142.92 -26%
Sequential Read 256KB	787.6	487.34 -38%	281 -64%	423.9 -46%	258.23 -67%	439.66 -44%	594.23 -25%
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1		-50%			-27%	-18%	38%	55%
Memory Tests	9844	6136 -38%			9673 -2%	8912 -9%	14580 48%	25299 157%
Disk Tests	92548	36364 -61%			44706 -52%	68378 -26%	117939 27%	48907 -47%
BaseMark OS II
Memory	3135	2072 -34%	1434 -54%	1581 -50%	1677 -47%	2190 -30%	3850 23%	1319 -58%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-33% / -26%	-50% / -46%	-31% / -17%	-38% / -37%	2% / 28%	10% / -10%	-2% / 17%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Beállítások	Érték
	high	30 fps
	very low	30 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Beállítások	Érték
	high	30 fps

... összehasonlítva

Max. terhelés

Üresjárat


35.4 °C	35.7 °C	34.8 °C
35.2 °C	35.6 °C	33.5 °C
34.3 °C	34.3 °C	33.1 °C

Maximum: 35.7 °C
Átlag: 34.7 °C


32.3 °C	35.8 °C	36 °C
31.7 °C	34.3 °C	33.4 °C
31.8 °C	32.8 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 36 °C
Átlag: 33.5 °C

Tápegység (max.) 30.1 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Teufel Boomster audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.52 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás

Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét	0.02 / 0.13 Watt
Üresjárat	0.68 / 1.13 / 1.16 Watt
Terhelés	4.69 / 5.24 Watt


Kulcs: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh	LG G6 3300 mAh	HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh	Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh	Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh
Power Consumption		-16%	-33%	-77%	-1%	-50%	-50%
Idle Minimum *	0.68	0.63 7%	0.62 9%	1 -47%	0.53 22%	0.77 -13%	0.78 -15%
Idle Average *	1.13	1.1 3%	1.43 -27%	2.41 -113%	1.07 5%	2.04 -81%	2.13 -88%
Idle Maximum *	1.16	1.56 -34%	1.48 -28%	2.46 -112%	1.12 3%	2.24 -93%	2.17 -87%
Load Average *	4.69	5.95 -27%	5.52 -18%	6.8 -45%	5.53 -18%	4.69 -0%	6.32 -35%
Load Maximum *	5.24	6.7 -28%	10.47 -100%	8.9 -70%	6.26 -19%	8.66 -65%	6.49 -24%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő

Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)		26h 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		12h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 22min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)		4h 35min

PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 battery life
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017	681 min ∼100% +28%
Huawei Mate 9	677 min ∼99% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	533 min ∼78%
Sony Xperia XZ	482 min ∼71% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7	371 min ∼54% -30%

	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh	HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh	Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh	LG G6 3300 mAh	Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ 2900 mAh	Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh
Battery Runtime		18%	-17%	-24%	1%	2%	-33%	-11%
Reader / Idle	1565	1663 6%	1568 0%	1333 -15%	1789 14%	1538 -2%	1125 -28%	1371 -12%
H.264	742	914 23%	605 -18%	505 -32%	779 5%	947 28%	502 -32%	724 -2%
WiFi v1.3	736	732 -1%	546 -26%	505 -31%	692 -6%	758 3%	438 -40%	407 -45%
Load	275	392 43%	214 -22%	230 -16%	252 -8%	219 -20%	187 -32%	320 16%

Pro

+ kiváló kijelző

+ szép design

+ gyors lapkakészlet

+ nagyon jó GPS

+ gyors Wi-Fi

+ gigabites LTE

+ jó hangminőség

+ átgondolt szenzorkészlet

+ USB 3.1 DP-vel, HDMI-vel és OTG-vel

+ hosszú üzemidő

+ gyorstöltés és vezeték nélküli töltés

+ víz- és porálló

+ nagyon jó kamera...

Kontra

- …bár sajnos nem sokkal jobb elődjénél

- nincs dual-SIM

- több LTE sávot is támogathatna

- az ujjlenyomat olvasó rossz helyen van

- tartós terhelés alatt visszafogja magát a lapkakészlet

- a garancia nem fedi le a víz okozta károkat

In review: Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (SM-G955F). Test model courtesy of Samsung Germany.

A Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus kiváló okostelefon, amelynek nincs nagyobb hiányossága. Az új, majdnem teljesen keret nélküli design képen is jól mutat, de élőben még lenyűgözőbb. Az Infinity kijelző minden téren jól teljesít: színhűség, fényerő, tükröződésmentesség. Az új Samsung Exynos 8895 teljesítménye is remek, képes lépést tartani az Apple A10 chipjével.

A Galaxy S8 Plus konnektivitását sem tudjuk kritikával illetni. A hangminősége jó, és nagyon gyors WiFi-t, és gigabites LTE-t kapunk. Az utóbbi azért támogathatna több frekvenciasávot, mert Észak-Amerikában, vagy Ázsiában gondjaink lehetnek vele. A gyártó helyfüggő korlátozásai idegesítőek, ráadásul Európában nem kapható dual-SIM képes modell sem.

A Samsung Galaxy S8+ sok csúcsfunkcióval, remek kamerával és kiváló üzemidővel bír. Tesztünk után nem sok rosszat tudunk mondani róla.

Úgy általában is szívesen látnánk valamivel több választási lehetőséget a vásárlók számára. A 128 GB-os verzió, és egyes színek sem lesznek elérhetők Európában.

A Samsung egy sor biztonsági funkcióval is ellátta a telefont. Az arcfelismerő használatát azonban nem javasoljuk, mert könnyen átverhető. A hátlapra került ujjlenyomat olvasót is nehéz elérni.

Mindent egybevetve, a Samsung kiváló okostelefont alkotott, amely dizájnjával, kiváló kamerájával, nagyon jó üzemidejével, és csodás, keret nélküli kijelzőjével nyűgözött le minket. Csak a kisebb S8 modell árára rápakolt plusz magas kissé.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus - 2017-04-1304/13/2017 v6^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Váz

93%

Billentyűzet

74 / 75 → 98%

Érintőpad

98%

Csatlakoztathatóság

65 / 60 → 100%

Súly

90%

Akkumulátor

94%

Kijelző

93%

Játékok alatti teljesítmény

64 / 63 → 100%

Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény

65 / 70 → 93%

Hőmérséklet

92%

Zaj

100%

Audio

71 / 91 → 78%

Camera

94%

Átlag

84%

92%

Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Linked Articles

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Galaxy S Széria)

Teszt

•

Samsung Galaxy S10e Smartphone...

Teszt

•

Samsung Galaxy S10 Smartphone ...

Teszt

•

Samsung Galaxy S10+ Okostelefo...

Teszt

•

Samsung Galaxy S9 Smartphone r...

Teszt

•

Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Smartph...

Teszt

•

Samsung Galaxy S8 Smartphone r...

Samsung Galaxy S8+ (Plus, SM-G955F) Smartphone rövid értékelés

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus audio analysis

Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis

Teufel Boomster audio analysis

Pro

Kontra

Linked Articles

Pricecompare