Notebookcheck

Samsung Galaxy S10e Smartphone rövid értékelés

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (fordította Zoltan), 04/28/2019
Android ARM Galaxy S Smartphone Touchscreen

Olcsó és derűs. A Samsung legkisebb zászlóshajója kedvezni fog azoknak, akik szerint 1000 eurót (1,125 dollárt) kiadni egy okostelefonra abszurdnak számít. Az S10e számos olyan funkcióval rendelkezik, amivel drágább testvérei, de a Samsung néhány kompromisszumra kényszerült a költségek csökkentése érdekében. Tovább olvasva kiderül, hogyan teljesít az S10e a tesztjeinkben, és jobb ár-érték arányt kínál-e, mint a Galaxy S10 vagy S10+.

Samsung Galaxy S10e (Galaxy S Széria)
Processzor
Samsung Exynos 9820
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-G76 MP12
Memória
6144 MB 
Kijelző
5.8 hüvelyk 19:9, 2280 x 1080 pixel 435 PPI, Kapacitív érintőkijelző, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, fényes: igen
Háttértár
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
Csatlakozók
1 USB 3.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm, Kártyaolvasó: microSD kártyák 512 GB-ig, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: Gyorsulásmérő, Barométer, Iránytű, Giroszenzor, Közelségérzékelő, USB Type-C
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8, B34, B39. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B13, B17, B18, B19, B20, B25, B26, B28, B32, B38, B39, B40, B41, B66., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.9 x 142.2 x 69.9
Akkumulátor
11.78 Wh, 3100 mAh Lítium-Ion, 15 W (Samsung Adaptív Gyorstöltés/Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0), 12 W vezeték nélküli töltés, Qi/PMA kétirányú vezeték nélküli töltés.
Operációs rendszer
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix , f/1.5 - f/2.4, Dual Pixel PD-autófókusz (PDAF), Optikai Képstabilizátor (OIS), LED segédfény, Videók 2160p/60 FPS-ig - kamera 1. 16.0 MP, f/2.2, széles látószögű - kamera 2
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix f/1.9, 26 mm, 1.22 μm, videók 2160p/30 FPS-ig
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: Sztereó hangszórók, Billentyűzet: Virtuális, USB kábel, töltő, SIM szerszám, USB adapter, fülhallgatók, 24 Hónap Garancia, SAR értékek: Test – 1.575 W/kg, Fej - 0.582 W/kg. IP68 tanúsítvány, LTE: 2.0 Gbps letöltés és 150 Mbps feltöltés, fanless
Súly
150 g
Ár
749 Euró
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Galaxy S10e

Size Comparison

157.5 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 185 g157.6 mm 74.1 mm 7.8 mm 198 g156.9 mm 75.4 mm 8.1 mm 180 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g149.9 mm 70.4 mm 7.8 mm 157 g142.2 mm 69.9 mm 7.9 mm 150 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 (min: 612, max: 683) MBit/s ∼100% +23%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 561, max: 684) MBit/s ∼99% +22%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
629 (min: 621, max: 638) MBit/s ∼98% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
520 (min: 445, max: 571) MBit/s ∼81%
Apple iPhone XR
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
517 (min: 477, max: 528) MBit/s ∼81% -1%
Honor View 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
339 (min: 325, max: 351) MBit/s ∼53% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=381)
221 MBit/s ∼35% -57%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone XR
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
644 (min: 578, max: 672) MBit/s ∼100% +38%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 (min: 558, max: 592) MBit/s ∼90% +24%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
474 (min: 241, max: 497) MBit/s ∼74% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
468 (min: 351, max: 489) MBit/s ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
457 (min: 398, max: 508) MBit/s ∼71% -2%
Honor View 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
298 (min: 278, max: 319) MBit/s ∼46% -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=381)
212 MBit/s ∼33% -55%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø519 (445-571)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø468 (351-489)
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy S10e - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy S10e - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy S10e - Loop
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy S10e - Loop
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy S10e - Bridge
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy S10e - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed using the Samsung Galaxy S10e
Photographed with the regular rear-facing camera
Photographed with the regular rear-facing camera
Photographed with the wide-angle rear-facing camera
Photographed with the wide-angle rear-facing camera
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
Our test chart in detail
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
433
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 435 cd/m² Átlag: 426.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.13 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 96 %
Centrumban: 426 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.14 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.111
Samsung Galaxy S10e
AMOLED, 2280x1080, 5.8
OnePlus 6T
Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
Honor View 20
LTPS, 2310x1080, 6.4
Samsung Galaxy S10
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.1
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4
Apple iPhone XR
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1
Screen
-7%
-21%
-22%
-22%
23%
Brightness middle
426
437
3%
492
15%
701
65%
710
67%
672
58%
Brightness
427
442
4%
475
11%
705
65%
721
69%
641
50%
Brightness Distribution
96
95
-1%
94
-2%
98
2%
97
1%
92
-4%
Black Level *
0.4
0.35
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.14
2.21
-3%
2.4
-12%
3.7
-73%
3.7
-73%
1.3
39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.29
4.27
-30%
5.2
-58%
10.3
-213%
10.3
-213%
2.7
18%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.8
2.1
-17%
3.2
-78%
1.4
22%
1.5
17%
2.2
-22%
Gamma
2.111 104%
2.307 95%
2.06 107%
2.1 105%
2.1 105%
2.3 96%
CCT
6329 103%
6353 102%
7125 91%
6553 99%
6611 98%
6868 95%
Contrast
1230
1920

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 232 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 232 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 232 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9622 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.6 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10170 Points ∼48%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13341 Points ∼63% +31%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9028 Points ∼43% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10128 Points ∼48% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10177 Points ∼48% 0%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
21070 Points ∼100% +107%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (10128 - 10177, n=3)
10158 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (870 - 21070, n=267)
4616 Points ∼22% -55%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10553 Points ∼94%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8995 Points ∼80% -15%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9868 Points ∼88% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10162 Points ∼90% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10259 Points ∼91% -3%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
11276 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (10162 - 10553, n=3)
10325 Points ∼92% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=320)
4465 Points ∼40% -58%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4506 Points ∼95%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2384 Points ∼50% -47%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3314 Points ∼70% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4499 Points ∼95% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4505 Points ∼95% 0%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
4750 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4499 - 4506, n=3)
4503 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (437 - 4824, n=321)
1316 Points ∼28% -71%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
7966 Points ∼86%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8487 Points ∼92% +7%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9243 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7595 Points ∼82% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7812 Points ∼85% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7595 - 7966, n=3)
7791 Points ∼84% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9974 - 9974, n=329)
4847 Points ∼52% -39%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10008 Points ∼78%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
10590 Points ∼83% +6%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
12778 Points ∼100% +28%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9750 Points ∼76% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9793 Points ∼77% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (9750 - 10008, n=3)
9850 Points ∼77% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4290 - 13531, n=498)
5274 Points ∼41% -47%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3106 Points ∼71%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3681 Points ∼84% +19%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4381 Points ∼100% +41%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2981 Points ∼68% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2925 Points ∼67% -6%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3030 Points ∼69% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2925 - 3106, n=3)
3004 Points ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=344)
1783 Points ∼41% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
5368 Points ∼91%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5877 Points ∼100% +9%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3718 Points ∼63% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5358 Points ∼91% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5371 Points ∼91% 0%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
5061 Points ∼86% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (5358 - 5371, n=3)
5366 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=344)
1521 Points ∼26% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4620 Points ∼89%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5189 Points ∼100% +12%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3847 Points ∼74% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4551 Points ∼88% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼87% -2%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
4405 Points ∼85% -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4529 - 4620, n=3)
4567 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=347)
1419 Points ∼27% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3077 Points ∼70%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3374 Points ∼77% +10%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4393 Points ∼100% +43%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3087 Points ∼70% 0%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
2880 Points ∼66% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (3077 - 3087, n=2)
3082 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=359)
1760 Points ∼40% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4886 Points ∼35%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8397 Points ∼60% +72%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5327 Points ∼38% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4449 Points ∼32% -9%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
14085 Points ∼100% +188%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4449 - 4886, n=2)
4668 Points ∼33% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=359)
2092 Points ∼15% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4321 Points ∼57%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6310 Points ∼84% +46%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5087 Points ∼67% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4052 Points ∼54% -6%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
7555 Points ∼100% +75%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4052 - 4321, n=2)
4187 Points ∼55% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7980, n=360)
1781 Points ∼24% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3005 Points ∼72%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3537 Points ∼85% +18%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4175 Points ∼100% +39%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2854 Points ∼68% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2977 Points ∼71% -1%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3121 Points ∼75% +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2854 - 3005, n=3)
2945 Points ∼71% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4262, n=418)
1720 Points ∼41% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
5206 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5241 Points ∼100% +1%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4256 Points ∼81% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5176 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼99% 0%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3806 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (5176 - 5206, n=3)
5189 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=420)
1260 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4477 Points ∼95%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4734 Points ∼100% +6%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4238 Points ∼90% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4383 Points ∼93% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4452 Points ∼94% -1%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3629 Points ∼77% -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4383 - 4477, n=3)
4437 Points ∼94% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=428)
1207 Points ∼25% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
2906 Points ∼69%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3483 Points ∼83% +20%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4214 Points ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2875 Points ∼68% -1%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
2960 Points ∼70% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2875 - 2906, n=2)
2891 Points ∼69% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4240, n=451)
1626 Points ∼39% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4507 Points ∼54%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8272 Points ∼100% +84%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5252 Points ∼63% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5303 Points ∼64% +18%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
7806 Points ∼94% +73%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4507 - 5303, n=2)
4905 Points ∼59% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 9983, n=451)
1712 Points ∼21% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4015 Points ∼63%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6336 Points ∼100% +58%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4979 Points ∼79% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4465 Points ∼70% +11%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
5724 Points ∼90% +43%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4015 - 4465, n=2)
4240 Points ∼67% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7673, n=459)
1470 Points ∼23% -63%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
32155 Points ∼87%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35022 Points ∼94% +9%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
37164 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
31297 Points ∼84% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32302 Points ∼87% 0%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
27413 Points ∼74% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (31297 - 32302, n=3)
31918 Points ∼86% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8253 - 45072, n=613)
13377 Points ∼36% -58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
72022 Points ∼44%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
84998 Points ∼52% +18%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
67388 Points ∼41% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
71292 Points ∼44% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
70318 Points ∼43% -2%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
162695 Points ∼100% +126%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (70318 - 72022, n=3)
71211 Points ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3588 - 162695, n=613)
19189 Points ∼12% -73%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
56465 Points ∼73%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
64534 Points ∼83% +14%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
57073 Points ∼74% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55524 Points ∼72% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55740 Points ∼72% -1%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
77597 Points ∼100% +37%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (55524 - 56465, n=3)
55910 Points ∼72% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4164 - 83518, n=614)
16078 Points ∼21% -72%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
141 fps ∼61%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
152 fps ∼66% +8%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
118 fps ∼51% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
143 fps ∼62% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
96 fps ∼41% -32%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
232 fps ∼100% +65%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (96 - 143, n=3)
127 fps ∼55% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=639)
33.7 fps ∼15% -76%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
60 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
58 fps ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (58 - 60, n=3)
59.3 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=642)
26.2 fps ∼44% -56%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
85 fps ∼64%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼45% -31%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
67 fps ∼51% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
85 fps ∼64% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼51% -21%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
132 fps ∼100% +55%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (67 - 85, n=3)
79 fps ∼60% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 132, n=558)
18.4 fps ∼14% -78%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
59 fps ∼98%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼98% 0%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
59 fps ∼98% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼88% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼88% -10%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (53 - 59, n=3)
55 fps ∼92% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=563)
17.1 fps ∼29% -71%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
53 fps ∼60%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼67% +11%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
50 fps ∼57% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼60% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼76% +26%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
88 fps ∼100% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (53 - 67, n=3)
57.7 fps ∼66% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=420)
15.3 fps ∼17% -71%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
53 fps ∼88%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
53 fps ∼88% 0%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
48 fps ∼80% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
30 fps ∼50% -43%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼62% -30%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (30 - 53, n=3)
40 fps ∼67% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=423)
14.7 fps ∼25% -72%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
28 fps ∼47%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼37% -21%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
20 fps ∼34% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼27% -43%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼27% -43%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
59 fps ∼100% +111%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 28, n=3)
20 fps ∼34% -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 59, n=124)
8.96 fps ∼15% -68%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
16 fps ∼80%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼70% -12%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
14 fps ∼70% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼85% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼85% +6%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
20 fps ∼100% +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 17, n=3)
16.7 fps ∼84% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=124)
6.23 fps ∼31% -61%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
16 fps ∼27%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼58% +113%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
31 fps ∼53% +94%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
25 fps ∼42% +56%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼44% +63%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
59 fps ∼100% +269%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 26, n=3)
22.3 fps ∼38% +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=125)
13.3 fps ∼23% -17%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
41 fps ∼65%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼59% -10%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
34 fps ∼54% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
44 fps ∼70% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼73% +12%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
63 fps ∼100% +54%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (41 - 46, n=3)
43.7 fps ∼69% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=124)
14.9 fps ∼24% -64%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
43 fps ∼80%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼65% -19%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
32 fps ∼59% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
35 fps ∼65% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼80% 0%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
54 fps ∼100% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (35 - 43, n=3)
40.3 fps ∼75% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=349)
10.4 fps ∼19% -76%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
40 fps ∼69%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼53% -22%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
28 fps ∼48% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼40% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼40% -42%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
58 fps ∼100% +45%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (23 - 40, n=3)
28.7 fps ∼49% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=353)
9.33 fps ∼16% -77%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
32.64 fps ∼92%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35.34 fps ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
33.04 (min: 9.22, max: 75.78) fps ∼93% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32.26 (min: 8.31, max: 85.07) fps ∼91% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (32.3 - 33, n=3)
32.6 fps ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.21 - 651, n=50)
29.5 fps ∼83% -10%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
36.21 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
29.68 fps ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.16 (min: 8.36, max: 61.33) fps ∼75% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.18 (min: 8.36, max: 46.5) fps ∼75% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (27.2 - 36.2, n=3)
30.2 fps ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.43 - 606, n=45)
26.9 fps ∼74% -26%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
38.57 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32.86 fps ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.35 (min: 8.77, max: 77.53) fps ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.5 (min: 9.69, max: 72.94) fps ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (38.4 - 38.6, n=3)
38.5 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.35 - 739, n=45)
32.4 fps ∼84% -16%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
329444 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
294488 Points ∼88% -11%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
306296 Points ∼92% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
328111 Points ∼98% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
333277 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (328111 - 333277, n=3)
330277 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (36768 - 374820, n=240)
125633 Points ∼38% -62%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
274007 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
228939 Points ∼84% -16%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
252800 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
269219 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
273655 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (269219 - 274007, n=3)
272294 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 274007, n=447)
82306 Points ∼30% -70%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4716 Score ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4967 Score ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
 
4967 Score ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1029 - 5025, n=49)
2007 Score ∼40%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
1439 Points ∼84%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1398 Points ∼81% -3%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1404 Points ∼82% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1385 Points ∼80% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1383 Points ∼80% -4%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
1722 Points ∼100% +20%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (1383 - 1439, n=3)
1402 Points ∼81% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=572)
726 Points ∼42% -50%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
8484 Points ∼53%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7969 Points ∼50% -6%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7484 Points ∼47% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7361 Points ∼46% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8401 Points ∼53% -1%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
15969 Points ∼100% +88%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7361 - 8484, n=3)
8082 Points ∼51% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=572)
1867 Points ∼12% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4474 Points ∼80%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4344 Points ∼77% -3%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5616 Points ∼100% +26%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4570 Points ∼81% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4306 Points ∼77% -4%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3263 Points ∼58% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4306 - 4570, n=3)
4450 Points ∼79% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6283, n=572)
1377 Points ∼25% -69%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
7831 Points ∼66%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8156 Points ∼68% +4%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8594 Points ∼72% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7476 Points ∼63% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8344 Points ∼70% +7%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
11946 Points ∼100% +53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7476 - 8344, n=3)
7884 Points ∼66% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=572)
2747 Points ∼23% -65%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4548 Points ∼79%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4458 Points ∼78% -2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4746 Points ∼83% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4320 Points ∼76% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4520 Points ∼79% -1%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
5721 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4320 - 4548, n=3)
4463 Points ∼78% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=576)
1363 Points ∼24% -70%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
1937 Points ∼70%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1201 Points ∼44% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1927 Points ∼70% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1928 Points ∼70% 0%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
2754 Points ∼100% +42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (1927 - 1937, n=3)
1931 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (36.3 - 2754, n=88)
743 Points ∼27% -62%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)
42897 Points ∼100% +129%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
22500 Points ∼52% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20849 Points ∼49% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20286 Points ∼47% +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (18697 - 20849, n=3)
19944 Points ∼46% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)
18697 Points ∼44%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
16824 Points ∼39% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (3126 - 43280, n=632)
6006 Points ∼14% -68%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=652)
11014 ms * ∼100% -392%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
2281.6 ms * ∼21% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)
2239.5 ms * ∼20%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
2048.1 ms * ∼19% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1857 - 2240, n=3)
2007 ms * ∼18% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1924.2 ms * ∼17% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1856.6 ms * ∼17% +17%
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)
610.3 ms * ∼6% +73%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)
161 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
115 Points ∼71%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
115 Points ∼71%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
99 Points ∼61%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 161, n=106)
63.7 Points ∼40%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)
343 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
325 Points ∼95% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
314 Points ∼92% +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (292 - 325, n=3)
310 Points ∼90% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)
292 Points ∼85%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
263 Points ∼77% -10%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
260 Points ∼76% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (106 - 362, n=320)
118 Points ∼34% -60%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy S10eOnePlus 6THonor View 20Samsung Galaxy S10Samsung Galaxy S10 PlusApple iPhone XRAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-3%
134%
3%
4%
41%
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
60.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
64.7 (51.3 - 72.4, n=13)
7%
47.9 (9.5 - 87.1, n=382)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
79.6 (73.2 - 85.4, n=13)
9%
66 (8.1 - 96.5, n=382)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
24.1
22
-9%
138.85
476%
24.44
1%
22.7
-6%
80.3 (18.2 - 250, n=31)
233%
18.8 (0.14 - 250, n=683)
-22%
Random Read 4KB
136.9
138.5
1%
168.91
23%
137.4
0%
135.16
-1%
136 (98.9 - 158, n=31)
-1%
42.9 (1.59 - 174, n=683)
-69%
Sequential Write 256KB
194.1
204.4
5%
250.06
29%
193.24
0%
249.06
28%
198 (183 - 212, n=31)
2%
88.7 (2.99 - 388, n=683)
-54%
Sequential Read 256KB
792.2
735.3
-7%
847.48
7%
831.94
5%
811.17
2%
740 (427 - 912, n=31)
-7%
250 (12.1 - 1468, n=683)
-68%
0102030405060Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.28.2.2: Ø59.5 (51-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.28.2.2: Ø59.8 (57-60)
; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.17.0: Ø59.4 (56-60)
; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.17.0: Ø59.8 (57-60)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.4.3a: Ø29 (27-30)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.4.3a: Ø28.7 (26-31)
Max. terhelés
 42.4 °C43.3 °C41.5 °C 
 42.9 °C44.7 °C42.1 °C 
 44.5 °C47.1 °C42.6 °C 
Maximum: 47.1 °C
Átlag: 43.5 °C
35.8 °C42.4 °C38.6 °C
36.7 °C43 °C38.9 °C
38.4 °C45.6 °C40.2 °C
Maximum: 45.6 °C
Átlag: 40 °C
Tápegység (max.)  43.3 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.640.5254346.13134.133.24040.535.85040.236.56333.929.48023.824.41002625.612528.334.316022.746.420018.748.725018.351.431517.55640017.160.150017.164.963015.868.98001672.1100017.571.912501572.616001672.120001672.8250015.873.2315014.673.5400014.469.5500014.464.8630014.566.5800014.568.51000014.569.71250014.7671600014.765.3SPL64.527.983N18.1155.4median 16median 67Delta29.939.434.728.327.118.722.126.726.333.235.722.629.221.824.224.423.923.834.918.551.817.151.517.858.915.561.314.164.51468.813.86714.770.815.473.415.275.314.375.514.576.413.977.414.678.714.180.314.377.514.575.214.871.614.866.814.8611555.426.8880.872median 14.8median 68.81.510.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S10eSamsung Galaxy S10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S10e audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy S10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.6 / 1.2 / 1.5 Watt
Terhelés midlight 5.2 / 10.2 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S10e
3100 mAh
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
Honor View 20
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Apple iPhone XR
2942 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-2%
-48%
0%
-19%
-28%
-6%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.7
-17%
0.97
-62%
0.61
-2%
0.73
-22%
0.61
-2%
0.647 (0.6 - 0.73, n=3)
-8%
0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=714)
-47%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.1
8%
2.58
-115%
1.27
-6%
1.53
-28%
2.67
-123%
1.333 (1.2 - 1.53, n=3)
-11%
1.735 (0.6 - 6.2, n=713)
-45%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
2.1
-40%
2.63
-75%
1.3
13%
2.07
-38%
2.69
-79%
1.623 (1.3 - 2.07, n=3)
-8%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=714)
-35%
Load Average *
5.2
4.2
19%
5.24
-1%
6.17
-19%
6.03
-16%
4.34
17%
5.8 (5.2 - 6.17, n=3)
-12%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=708)
22%
Load Maximum *
10.2
8.3
19%
8.73
14%
8.55
16%
9.18
10%
5.66
45%
9.31 (8.55 - 10.2, n=3)
9%
5.85 (1.2 - 14.2, n=708)
43%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
19h 45min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 56min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 15min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
2h 44min
Samsung Galaxy S10e
3100 mAh
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
Honor View 20
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Apple iPhone XR
2942 mAh
Battery Runtime
61%
62%
5%
20%
91%
Reader / Idle
1185
1936
63%
1928
63%
1259
6%
1560
32%
2969
151%
H.264
795
903
14%
932
17%
842
6%
921
16%
1011
27%
WiFi v1.3
416
865
108%
969
133%
427
3%
483
16%
910
119%
Load
164
261
59%
222
35%
170
4%
187
14%
270
65%

Pro

+ jó ár-érték arány
+ pontos GPS modul
+ alacsony energiafogyasztás
+ erős SoC
+ jó színpontosságú képernyő
+ AMOLED panel
+ IP68 tanúsítvány víz és por ellen
+ aránylag kompakt
+ prémium felépítés és dizájn

Kontra

- rövid üzemidő
- magas felületi hőmérséklet
- SoC lefojtás folyamatos terhelés alatt
- érintőképernyős problémák az “Arena of Valor” játszása közben
Samsung Galaxy S10e Smartphone rövid értékelés. Test devices courtesy of Samsung Germany and notebooksbilliger.de
Samsung Galaxy S10e Smartphone rövid értékelés. Test devices courtesy of Samsung Germany and notebooksbilliger.de

A Samsung Galaxy S10e egy elsőrangú okostelefon, amelyre érdemes odafigyelni, mielőtt a jóval drágább Galaxy S10 és S10+ mellett döntenénk. Akad néhány kompromisszum, mint a harmadik hátsó kamera hiánya, és kerámia hátlapot sem választhatunk, ennek ellenére mégis egy prémium kivitelezésű eszközt kapunk, amelyen van fülhallgató jack, gyors LTE, erős SoC, és egy kamera, amely képes felvenni a versenyt egyéb zászlóshajó okostelefonokkal.

Meg kell elégednünk kevesebb tárhellyel és RAM-mal, de ez nem kell különösebben bosszantó legyen a legtöbb ember számára. A sötétebb képernyő, a gyengébb üzemidő és a nagyobb felületi hőmérséklet viszont már meggondolandó, ha az S10e és a Galalxy S10 között választunk. Javasolnánk ugyanakkor az odafigyelést az általunk tesztek közben tapasztalt érintőképernyős problémákra az “Arena of Valor” játszása közben. Nem tapasztaltunk ilyesmit más eszközökkel, amikor ezt a játékot futtattuk. A nagyobb frusztrációnk az S10e és testvéreivel kapcsolatban viszont az, hogy a Samsung megtagadja az aptX HD támogatását, ami kifejezetten makacsságnak tűnik részükről, mint bármi egyébnek.

Az S10 család legolcsóbb tagja nagyszerű alternatívája a drágább testvéreinek. Be kell érnünk kevésbé csillogó funkciókkal, mint amilyen a képernyőbe épített ujjlenyomat-olvasó, ennek ellenére egy zászlóshajó okostelefont kapunk, amely megállja a helyét a megfelelő területeken.

Összességében, az S10 semmi újat nem hoz a piacra, de ugyanúgy a Galaxy S10 vagy az S10+ sem. Ugyanakkor szolid zászlóshajó-élményt nyújt, és szinte minden téren jól teljesít. Szeretnénk azért valódi előrelépést látni a képminőséget illetően, mert a versenytársak kezdik ebben lekörözni a Samsung S10 szériát, különösen a gyenge fényviszonyok között. Röviden, az S10e jobb ár-érték arányt képvisel, mint a Galaxy S10 és az S10+.

Samsung Galaxy S10e - 04/02/2019 v6
Florian Schmitt

Váz
93%
Billentyűzet
64 / 75 → 86%
Érintőpad
99%
Csatlakoztathatóság
51 / 60 → 85%
Súly
92%
Akkumulátor
92%
Kijelző
90%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
63 / 63 → 100%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
77 / 70 → 100%
Hőmérséklet
83%
Zaj
100%
Audio
65 / 91 → 71%
Camera
93%
Átlag
82%
91%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Samsung Galaxy S10e Smartphone rövid értékelés
Florian Schmitt, 2019-04-28 (Update: 2019-04-28)