Sony Xperia XZ Smartphone rövid értékelés
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix 1/3.06” Exmor RS for mobile image Sensor, 22mm nagylátószögű F2.0 lencse
» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Sony Xperia XZ |
|
Fényerő megoszlás: 93 %
Centrumban: 544 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1470:1 (Fekete: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18
Sony Xperia XZ IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50 | Apple iPhone 7 IPS, 1334x750, 4.70 | Samsung Galaxy S7 SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.10 | HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.20 | Sony Xperia Z5 Premium IPS, 3840x2160, 5.50 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 2% | 30% | 24% | 12% | -25% | |
Brightness middle | 544 | 419 -23% | 556 2% | 350 -36% | 445 -18% | 560 3% |
Brightness | 521 | 431 -17% | 519 0% | 351 -33% | 434 -17% | 541 4% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 84 -10% | 90 -3% | 98 5% | 93 0% | 85 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.34 8% | 0.36 3% | 0.45 -22% | ||
Contrast | 1470 | 1635 11% | 1236 -16% | 1244 -15% | ||
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 5.8 | 4.1 29% | 1.3 78% | 2.04 65% | 2.8 52% | 9.19 -58% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 9.8 | 12 -22% | 2.6 73% | 3.25 67% | 5.8 41% | 15.01 -53% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 7.2 | 3.3 54% | 1.9 74% | 1.63 77% | 3.7 49% | 10.58 -47% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.1 105% | 2.26 97% | 2.07 106% | 2.31 95% | 2.7 81% |
CCT | 8619 75% | 6550 99% | 6818 95% | 6391 102% | 7164 91% | 9760 67% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 89.38 | 63.15 | 86.86 | 73.19 | ||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 99.71 | 99.35 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
↘ 39 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 30 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9714 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 |
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Apple iPhone 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
HTC 10 | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium |
* ... smaller is better
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Beállítások | Érték | ||
high | 30 fps | ||
very low | 30 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Beállítások | Érték | ||
high | 30 fps |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia XZ audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.01 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (21.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.06 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Samsung Galaxy S7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
OnePlus 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
HTC 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.13 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
LG G5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.41 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | ![]() ![]() |
Üresjárat | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Terhelés |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Kulcs:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sony Xperia XZ 2900 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 3430 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 41% | 56% | 52% | 33% | 25% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.76 | 0.57 68% | 0.54 69% | 0.68 61% | 0.68 61% | 0.83 53% |
Idle Average * | 3.6 | 1.24 66% | 1.51 58% | 1.02 72% | 1.49 59% | 2.36 34% |
Idle Maximum * | 4.06 | 1.36 67% | 1.54 62% | 1.14 72% | 1.91 53% | 2.42 40% |
Load Average * | 7 | 5.92 15% | 3.75 46% | 4.73 32% | 7.4 -6% | 7.27 -4% |
Load Maximum * | 9.52 | 10.53 -11% | 5.01 47% | 7.16 25% | 9.71 -2% | 9.18 4% |
* ... smaller is better
Sony Xperia XZ 2900 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 3430 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 56% | 22% | 43% | 11% | -2% | |
Reader / Idle | 1125 | 1338 19% | 1770 57% | 1810 61% | 1273 13% | 1277 14% |
H.264 | 502 | 847 69% | 722 44% | 892 78% | 648 29% | 411 -18% |
WiFi v1.3 | 438 | 840 92% | 517 18% | 456 4% | 413 -6% | 372 -15% |
Load | 187 | 268 43% | 126 -33% | 242 29% | 203 9% | 210 12% |
Pro
Kontra
Az Xperia XZ, a látnok, sajnos nem elég erős, hogy kirobbantson egy forradalmat. A teszt modellünk sok dologban túl konzervatív, és nem vállal kockázatot. "Forradalmi" helyett inkább megbízhatónak neveznénk.
A marketingkampány fő eleme a kamera: van néhány jó funkciója, de kimondottan átlagos, összehasonlítva a vetélytársakkal. Ezen kívül hiányzik belőle a képstabilizátor, amely javítana a képminőségen, rossz megvilágításban is. Az Xperia XZ-vel átlagos képeket lehet készíteni, a legtöbb vetélytársához hasonlóan.
Üzemidő, kijelző színhűség, WLAN sebesség és fogyasztás terén az Xperia XZ gyengén teljesít. Egy 700 eurós (~$763) okostelefontól többet várnánk. A lassú memóriahasználat különösen idegesítő, mert jelentősen megnöveli a játékok betöltésének idejét.
Azért a Sony sok dolgot jól csinált: a szoftverek sok, új felhasználók számára hasznos beállítással rendelkeznek, és a telefonhoz adott eszközökkel a hangok és a kijelző színei is javíthatók. A stílusos külső határozottan jó pont. A hangszórók és a gyenge melegedés szintén előnyös. Különösen értékeljük az ügyfélhűség-app, Xperia Lounge ajánlatait.
Összefoglalva, az Xperia XZ sok területen határozottan átlagos. Mint ilyen, nem képes kiemelkedő okostelefon lenni. Bár egy jó okostelefont alkotott a Sony, hiányzik belőle a valós innováció.
Tudjuk, hogy a Sony képes forradalmasítani az okostelefonok piacát: az Xperia Z5 Premium és más kompakt csúcsmodelljeik bizonyítékok a kreativitásukra. Ennek ellenére az Xperia XZ nem feszegeti az okostelefonok meglévő korlátait. Annak ellenére, hogy egy megbízható, csúcsminőségű készülék, a képességei nem biztos, hogy 700 eurót (~$763) érnek, hiszen sok vetélytársa, mint a OnePlus 3, a Galaxy S7 vagy az iPhone 7, amelyek sokkal jobban teljesítenek.
Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű értékelés itt olvasható.
Sony Xperia XZ - 11/02/2016 v5.1(old)
Florian Wimmer