Sony Xperia XZ Smartphone rövid értékelés

Name: Sony Xperia XZ
Brand: Sony

A látnok. A Sony forradalmat hirdet: az Xperia XZ-vel megváltoztatná a mindennapi életünket. Ennek ellenére a 23 MP-es kamerát leszámítva a specifikációi elég átlagosak. Lássuk, hogy mire képes ez a Sony zászlóvivő.

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Manuel Masiero (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 11/15/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Notebooksbilliger

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe	451 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Sony Xperia XZ Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	419 MBit/s ∼93%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	286 MBit/s ∼63% -32%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe	339 MBit/s ∼100% +151%
OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	256 MBit/s ∼76% +90%
Sony Xperia XZ Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	135 MBit/s ∼40%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


510 cd/m²	529 cd/m²	517 cd/m²
513 cd/m²	544 cd/m²	512 cd/m²
516 cd/m²	541 cd/m²	507 cd/m²

Fényerő megoszlás

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 544 cd/m² Átlag: 521 cd/m² Minimum: 5.51 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 93 %
Centrumban: 544 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1470:1 (Fekete: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18

	Sony Xperia XZ IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20	OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50	Apple iPhone 7 IPS, 1334x750, 4.70	Samsung Galaxy S7 SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.10	HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.20	Sony Xperia Z5 Premium IPS, 3840x2160, 5.50
Screen		2%	30%	24%	12%	-25%
Brightness middle	544	419 -23%	556 2%	350 -36%	445 -18%	560 3%
Brightness	521	431 -17%	519 0%	351 -33%	434 -17%	541 4%
Brightness Distribution	93	84 -10%	90 -3%	98 5%	93 0%	85 -9%
Black Level *	0.37		0.34 8%		0.36 3%	0.45 -22%
Contrast	1470		1635 11%		1236 -16%	1244 -15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	5.8	4.1 29%	1.3 78%	2.04 65%	2.8 52%	9.19 -58%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	9.8	12 -22%	2.6 73%	3.25 67%	5.8 41%	15.01 -53%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	7.2	3.3 54%	1.9 74%	1.63 77%	3.7 49%	10.58 -47%
Gamma	2.18 ^101%	2.1 ^105%	2.26 ^97%	2.07 ^106%	2.31 ^95%	2.7 ^81%
CCT	8619 ^75%	6550 ^99%	6818 ^95%	6391 ^102%	7164 ^91%	9760 ^67%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		89.38	63.15	86.86		73.19
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		100	99.71	99.35

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 39 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9714 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	129317 Points ∼44%
OnePlus 3	142090 Points ∼48% +10%
Apple iPhone 7	142532 Points ∼49% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S7	127902 Points ∼44% -1%
HTC 10	131866 Points ∼45% +2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	78324 Points ∼27% -39%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	1667 Points ∼31%
OnePlus 3	1789 Points ∼34% +7%
Apple iPhone 7	1525 Points ∼29% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2010 Points ∼38% +21%
HTC 10	1512 Points ∼29% -9%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1348 Points ∼25% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	4522 Points ∼27%
OnePlus 3	4633 Points ∼28% +2%
Apple iPhone 7	4057 Points ∼24% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7	3018 Points ∼18% -33%
HTC 10	4581 Points ∼27% +1%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	2336 Points ∼14% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	3275 Points ∼29%
OnePlus 3	3424 Points ∼30% +5%
Apple iPhone 7	2964 Points ∼26% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2715 Points ∼24% -17%
HTC 10	3157 Points ∼28% -4%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	2009 Points ∼18% -39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	20772 Points ∼21%
OnePlus 3	21771 Points ∼23% +5%
Apple iPhone 7	15450 Points ∼16% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S7	19944 Points ∼21% -4%
HTC 10	20344 Points ∼21% -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	12852 Points ∼13% -38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	32056 Points ∼5%
OnePlus 3	34023 Points ∼5% +6%
Apple iPhone 7	63974 Points ∼10% +100%
Samsung Galaxy S7	33348 Points ∼5% +4%
HTC 10	30061 Points ∼5% -6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	37725 Points ∼6% +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	28603 Points ∼10%
OnePlus 3	30241 Points ∼11% +6%
Apple iPhone 7	37676 Points ∼13% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S7	29015 Points ∼10% +1%
HTC 10	27176 Points ∼10% -5%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	26380 Points ∼9% -8%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	88 fps ∼1%
OnePlus 3	89 fps ∼1% +1%
Apple iPhone 7	110.3 fps ∼1% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7	84 fps ∼1% -5%
HTC 10	73 fps ∼1% -17%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	56 fps ∼0% -36%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	88 fps ∼3%
OnePlus 3	60 fps ∼2% -32%
Apple iPhone 7	57.7 fps ∼2% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S7	53 fps ∼2% -40%
HTC 10	43 fps ∼1% -51%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	52 fps ∼2% -41%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	40 fps ∼4%
OnePlus 3	47 fps ∼5% +18%
Apple iPhone 7	60.7 fps ∼7% +52%
Samsung Galaxy S7	40 fps ∼4% 0%
HTC 10	39 fps ∼4% -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	25 fps ∼3% -37%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	39 fps ∼11%
OnePlus 3	46 fps ∼13% +18%
Apple iPhone 7	58.5 fps ∼16% +50%
Samsung Galaxy S7	27 fps ∼7% -31%
HTC 10	24 fps ∼7% -38%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	27 fps ∼7% -31%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	31 fps ∼1%
OnePlus 3	31 fps ∼1% 0%
Apple iPhone 7	42.2 fps ∼1% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7	28 fps ∼1% -10%
HTC 10	24 fps ∼1% -23%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	18 fps ∼0% -42%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	31 fps ∼1%
OnePlus 3	30 fps ∼1% -3%
Apple iPhone 7	59.4 fps ∼2% +92%
Samsung Galaxy S7	15 fps ∼0% -52%
HTC 10	14 fps ∼0% -55%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	19 fps ∼1% -39%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	5058 Points ∼25%
OnePlus 3	7101 Points ∼36% +40%
Samsung Galaxy S7	4826 Points ∼24% -5%
HTC 10	5809 Points ∼29% +15%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	5094 Points ∼25% +1%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	1066 Points ∼49%
OnePlus 3	1112 Points ∼51% +4%
Apple iPhone 7	1531 Points ∼71% +44%
Samsung Galaxy S7	957 Points ∼44% -10%
HTC 10	928 Points ∼43% -13%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	986 Points ∼45% -8%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	4716 Points ∼16%
OnePlus 3	4813 Points ∼17% +2%
Apple iPhone 7	6896 Points ∼24% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S7	1723 Points ∼6% -63%
HTC 10	5009 Points ∼17% +6%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	3137 Points ∼11% -33%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	1434 Points ∼16%
OnePlus 3	2052 Points ∼23% +43%
Apple iPhone 7	1257 Points ∼14% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2244 Points ∼25% +56%
HTC 10	1772 Points ∼20% +24%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	876 Points ∼10% -39%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	3047 Points ∼19%
OnePlus 3	3537 Points ∼21% +16%
Apple iPhone 7	6097 Points ∼37% +100%
Samsung Galaxy S7	4217 Points ∼26% +38%
HTC 10	2806 Points ∼17% -8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	2737 Points ∼17% -10%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	2165 Points ∼26%
OnePlus 3	2496 Points ∼30% +15%
Apple iPhone 7	2999 Points ∼35% +39%
Samsung Galaxy S7	1987 Points ∼24% -8%
HTC 10	2193 Points ∼26% +1%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1649 Points ∼20% -24%

Geekbench 4.0
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	7046 Points ∼56%
OnePlus 3	7085 Points ∼56% +1%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	3701 Points ∼9%
OnePlus 3	4097 Points ∼10% +11%
Apple iPhone 7	5585 Points ∼14% +51%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	1647 Points ∼25%
OnePlus 3	1754 Points ∼27% +6%
Apple iPhone 7	3490 Points ∼54% +112%

Legend

Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe

Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	29.8 MB/s ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy S7	53.6 MB/s ∼62% +80%
HTC 10	65.44 MB/s ∼75% +120%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	33.5 MB/s ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy S7	72.33 MB/s ∼75% +116%
HTC 10	83.3 MB/s ∼86% +149%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	10.5 MB/s ∼3%
OnePlus 3	18.23 MB/s ∼6% +74%
Samsung Galaxy S7	16.01 MB/s ∼5% +52%
HTC 10	15.89 MB/s ∼5% +51%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	14.53 MB/s ∼5% +38%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	71.5 MB/s ∼19%
OnePlus 3	137.62 MB/s ∼37% +92%
Samsung Galaxy S7	85.9 MB/s ∼23% +20%
HTC 10	29.92 MB/s ∼8% -58%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	19.11 MB/s ∼5% -73%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	138 MB/s ∼10%
OnePlus 3	153.3 MB/s ∼12% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S7	145.72 MB/s ∼11% +6%
HTC 10	115.56 MB/s ∼9% -16%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	99.4 MB/s ∼8% -28%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	281 MB/s ∼14%
OnePlus 3	408.71 MB/s ∼20% +45%
Samsung Galaxy S7	483.82 MB/s ∼24% +72%
HTC 10	275.09 MB/s ∼14% -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	256.75 MB/s ∼13% -9%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	2768 ms * ∼5%
OnePlus 3	2920.7 ms * ∼5% -6%
Apple iPhone 7	1113.4 ms * ∼2% +60%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2561.5 ms * ∼4% +7%
HTC 10	3146.3 ms * ∼5% -14%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	4377.1 ms * ∼7% -58%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	9069 Points ∼14%
OnePlus 3	9155 Points ∼14% +1%
Apple iPhone 7	24875 Points ∼37% +174%
Samsung Galaxy S7	13161 Points ∼20% +45%
HTC 10	8905 Points ∼13% -2%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	8851 Points ∼13% -2%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	90 Points ∼11%
OnePlus 3	122 Points ∼15% +36%
Apple iPhone 7	202 Points ∼25% +124%
Samsung Galaxy S7	166 Points ∼21% +84%
HTC 10	108 Points ∼13% +20%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	106 Points ∼13% +18%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ	54.201 Points ∼13%
OnePlus 3	54.4 Points ∼13% 0%
Apple iPhone 7	165.86 Points ∼41% +206%
Samsung Galaxy S7	74 Points ∼18% +37%
HTC 10	52.1 Points ∼13% -4%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	48.2 Points ∼12% -11%

* ... smaller is better

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Beállítások	Érték
	high	30 fps
	very low	30 fps

... összehasonlítva

Dead Trigger 2
	Beállítások	Érték
	high	30 fps

... összehasonlítva

Max. terhelés

Üresjárat


37.6 °C	36.3 °C	35.4 °C
38.5 °C	37.5 °C	38.2 °C
37.1 °C	37.6 °C	37.6 °C

Maximum: 38.5 °C
Átlag: 37.3 °C


36.9 °C	38.5 °C	39.4 °C
37 °C	39 °C	39.7 °C
37.7 °C	37.7 °C	39.4 °C

Maximum: 39.7 °C
Átlag: 38.4 °C

Tápegység (max.) 38.4 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 22.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Sony Xperia XZ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.01 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (21.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.06 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

HTC 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.13 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

LG G5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.41 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás

Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét	0.09 / 0.18 Watt
Üresjárat	1.76 / 3.6 / 4.06 Watt
Terhelés	7 / 9.52 Watt


Kulcs: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Sony Xperia XZ 2900 mAh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 3430 mAh
Power Consumption		41%	56%	52%	33%	25%
Idle Minimum *	1.76	0.57 68%	0.54 69%	0.68 61%	0.68 61%	0.83 53%
Idle Average *	3.6	1.24 66%	1.51 58%	1.02 72%	1.49 59%	2.36 34%
Idle Maximum *	4.06	1.36 67%	1.54 62%	1.14 72%	1.91 53%	2.42 40%
Load Average *	7	5.92 15%	3.75 46%	4.73 32%	7.4 -6%	7.27 -4%
Load Maximum *	9.52	10.53 -11%	5.01 47%	7.16 25%	9.71 -2%	9.18 4%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő

Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)		18h 45min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		7h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 22min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)		3h 07min

	Sony Xperia XZ 2900 mAh	OnePlus 3 3000 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh	HTC 10 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 3430 mAh
Battery Runtime		56%	22%	43%	11%	-2%
Reader / Idle	1125	1338 19%	1770 57%	1810 61%	1273 13%	1277 14%
H.264	502	847 69%	722 44%	892 78%	648 29%	411 -18%
WiFi v1.3	438	840 92%	517 18%	456 4%	413 -6%	372 -15%
Load	187	268 43%	126 -33%	242 29%	203 9%	210 12%

Pro

+ stílusos dizájn

+ jó szoftver

+ változatos hang- és videobeállítások

+ gyors ujjlenyomatolvasó

+ megbízható kamera

+ nagy felbontású előlapi kamera

+ jó fotók

+ tiszta beszédhang

+ MHL, NFC, USB-OTG

+ precíz irányítás

+ egyenletes megvilágítás

+ jó fényerő

+ nem melegszik

+ jó hangszórók

Kontra

- reklám appok

- nagy energiaigény

- lassú adatátvitel

- a GPS-modul lassú

- komoly színeltérések a kijelzőn

In review: Sony Xperia XZ. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

Az Xperia XZ, a látnok, sajnos nem elég erős, hogy kirobbantson egy forradalmat. A teszt modellünk sok dologban túl konzervatív, és nem vállal kockázatot. "Forradalmi" helyett inkább megbízhatónak neveznénk.

A marketingkampány fő eleme a kamera: van néhány jó funkciója, de kimondottan átlagos, összehasonlítva a vetélytársakkal. Ezen kívül hiányzik belőle a képstabilizátor, amely javítana a képminőségen, rossz megvilágításban is. Az Xperia XZ-vel átlagos képeket lehet készíteni, a legtöbb vetélytársához hasonlóan.

Üzemidő, kijelző színhűség, WLAN sebesség és fogyasztás terén az Xperia XZ gyengén teljesít. Egy 700 eurós (~$763) okostelefontól többet várnánk. A lassú memóriahasználat különösen idegesítő, mert jelentősen megnöveli a játékok betöltésének idejét.

Azért a Sony sok dolgot jól csinált: a szoftverek sok, új felhasználók számára hasznos beállítással rendelkeznek, és a telefonhoz adott eszközökkel a hangok és a kijelző színei is javíthatók. A stílusos külső határozottan jó pont. A hangszórók és a gyenge melegedés szintén előnyös. Különösen értékeljük az ügyfélhűség-app, Xperia Lounge ajánlatait.

Összefoglalva, az Xperia XZ sok területen határozottan átlagos. Mint ilyen, nem képes kiemelkedő okostelefon lenni. Bár egy jó okostelefont alkotott a Sony, hiányzik belőle a valós innováció.

Tudjuk, hogy a Sony képes forradalmasítani az okostelefonok piacát: az Xperia Z5 Premium és más kompakt csúcsmodelljeik bizonyítékok a kreativitásukra. Ennek ellenére az Xperia XZ nem feszegeti az okostelefonok meglévő korlátait. Annak ellenére, hogy egy megbízható, csúcsminőségű készülék, a képességei nem biztos, hogy 700 eurót (~$763) érnek, hiszen sok vetélytársa, mint a OnePlus 3, a Galaxy S7 vagy az iPhone 7, amelyek sokkal jobban teljesítenek.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű értékelés itt olvasható.

Sony Xperia XZ - 2016-11-0211/02/2016 v5.1^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Váz

90%

Billentyűzet

66 / 75 → 88%

Érintőpad

87%

Csatlakoztathatóság

54 / 60 → 90%

Súly

91%

Akkumulátor

90%

Kijelző

85%

Játékok alatti teljesítmény

57 / 63 → 90%

Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény

57 / 70 → 82%

Hőmérséklet

88%

Zaj

100%

Audio

67 / 91 → 74%

Camera

84%

Átlag

78%

87%

Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Sony Xperia XZ Smartphone rövid értékelés

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Sony Xperia XZ audio analysis

Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S7 audio analysis

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

HTC 10 audio analysis

LG G5 audio analysis

Pro

Kontra

Pricecompare