Sony Xperia XZ Premium Smartphone rövid értékelés

Name: Sony Xperia XZ Premium
Brand: Sony

Új technológiák szállítója. A Sony csúcstelefonja, az Xperia XZ Premium egy sor innovatív technológiát kínál hang és kijelző (HDR) terén, de a ház kissé elavultnak tűnik. Cikkünkből kiderül, hogy érdemes-e a külső alapján ítélkeznünk.

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 07/20/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja

Size Comparison

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Apple iPhone 7 Plus Sony Xperia XZ Premium Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL Huawei P10 Plus ❌

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ Premium Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)	501 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)	368 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL Adreno 530, SD 821, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)	70.4 MBit/s ∼14% -86%
Huawei P10 Plus Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)	40.8 MBit/s ∼8% -92%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)	656 MBit/s ∼100% +33%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)	494 MBit/s ∼75%
Huawei P10 Plus Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)	128 MBit/s ∼20% -74%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL Adreno 530, SD 821, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)	75.5 MBit/s ∼12% -85%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Sony Xperia XZ Premium

HTC U11

Galaxy S8 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Sony Xperia XZ Premium

HTC U11

Galaxy S8 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Sony Xperia XZ Premium

HTC U11

Galaxy S8 Plus

Canon EOS 70D

ColorChecker Passport: The reference color is in the bottom field.

Comparison image HDR video Sony XZ Premium (4K, HDR) and OnePlus 2 (1080p, no HDR)


543 cd/m²	561 cd/m²	554 cd/m²
575 cd/m²	578 cd/m²	568 cd/m²
590 cd/m²	582 cd/m²	562 cd/m²

Fényerő megoszlás

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 590 cd/m² Átlag: 568.1 cd/m² Minimum: 6.02 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 92 %
Centrumban: 578 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 932:1 (Fekete: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
Gamma: 2.15

	Sony Xperia XZ Premium IPS, 3840x2160, 5.50	Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50	Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.70	Huawei P10 Plus LTPS, 2560x1440, 5.50	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.20
Screen		32%	-19%	15%	19%
Brightness middle	578	557 -4%	464 -20%	568 -2%	560 -3%
Brightness	568	553 -3%	468 -18%	562 -1%	562 -1%
Brightness Distribution	92	97 5%	85 -8%	92 0%	93 1%
Black Level *	0.62	0.35 44%		0.43 31%
Contrast	932	1591 71%		1321 42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	2.8	1.4 50%	3.2 -14%	2.4 14%	1.7 39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	5.1	3.1 39%	10.5 -106%	3.8 25%	3.4 33%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	2.8	1.3 54%	1.4 50%	2.5 11%	1.6 43%
Gamma	2.15 ^102%	2.21 ^100%	2.27 ^97%	2.37 ^93%	2.13 ^103%
CCT	6728 ^97%	6667 ^97%	6590 ^99%	6779 ^96%	6435 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		63.1			81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		99.83			99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

1136 Hz

≤ 33 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1136 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 33 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1136 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9700 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.4 ms rise
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	173403 Points ∼59%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	165399 Points ∼56% -5%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	154126 Points ∼53% -11%
Huawei P10 Plus	138326 Points ∼47% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	165382 Points ∼56% -5%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	6433 Points ∼42%
Huawei P10 Plus	6157 Points ∼40% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	5195 Points ∼34% -19%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	7695 Points ∼38%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	4940 Points ∼25% -36%
Huawei P10 Plus	7377 Points ∼37% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	5830 Points ∼29% -24%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	1239 Points ∼57%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1542 Points ∼71% +24%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	1136 Points ∼52% -8%
Huawei P10 Plus	1054 Points ∼49% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	1163 Points ∼54% -6%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	6045 Points ∼21%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	6875 Points ∼24% +14%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	4467 Points ∼15% -26%
Huawei P10 Plus	3438 Points ∼12% -43%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	6126 Points ∼21% +1%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	3444 Points ∼39%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1319 Points ∼15% -62%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	2051 Points ∼23% -40%
Huawei P10 Plus	3331 Points ∼38% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3135 Points ∼35% -9%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	5857 Points ∼12%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	6582 Points ∼13% +12%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	3763 Points ∼8% -36%
Huawei P10 Plus	3572 Points ∼7% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	5319 Points ∼11% -9%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	3506 Points ∼41%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3097 Points ∼37% -12%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	2501 Points ∼30% -29%
Huawei P10 Plus	2563 Points ∼30% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3301 Points ∼39% -6%

Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	7881 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	8295 Points ∼19% +5%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	6491 Points ∼10%
Huawei P10 Plus	6267 Points ∼10% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	6695 Points ∼11% +3%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	1904 Points ∼23%
Huawei P10 Plus	1852 Points ∼23% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2015 Points ∼25% +6%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	1628 Points ∼31%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	2046 Points ∼38% +26%
Huawei P10 Plus	1679 Points ∼32% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2466 Points ∼46% +51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	3723 Points ∼32%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	2944 Points ∼25% -21%
Huawei P10 Plus	1767 Points ∼15% -53%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3479 Points ∼30% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	2895 Points ∼14%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	2682 Points ∼13% -7%
Huawei P10 Plus	1747 Points ∼9% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3188 Points ∼16% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	1574 Points ∼30%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1522 Points ∼29% -3%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	2078 Points ∼39% +32%
Huawei P10 Plus	1662 Points ∼31% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2465 Points ∼47% +57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	5107 Points ∼31%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	4235 Points ∼25% -17%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	4694 Points ∼28% -8%
Huawei P10 Plus	2469 Points ∼15% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	4786 Points ∼29% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	3407 Points ∼30%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3034 Points ∼27% -11%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	3668 Points ∼33% +8%
Huawei P10 Plus	2229 Points ∼20% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3958 Points ∼35% +16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	13800 Points ∼14%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	15626 Points ∼16% +13%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	22044 Points ∼23% +60%
Huawei P10 Plus	14934 Points ∼15% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	20892 Points ∼22% +51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	52358 Points ∼8%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	63386 Points ∼10% +21%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	40761 Points ∼6% -22%
Huawei P10 Plus	33307 Points ∼5% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	33077 Points ∼5% -37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	32302 Points ∼11%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	37746 Points ∼13% +17%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	34290 Points ∼12% +6%
Huawei P10 Plus	26156 Points ∼9% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	29282 Points ∼10% -9%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	109 fps ∼1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	91.96 fps ∼1% -16%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	96 fps ∼1% -12%
Huawei P10 Plus	56 fps ∼0% -49%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	104 fps ∼1% -5%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	60 fps ∼2%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	57.71 fps ∼2% -4%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	59 fps ∼2% -2%
Huawei P10 Plus	40 fps ∼1% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	58 fps ∼2% -3%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	47 fps ∼5%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	58.71 fps ∼6% +25%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	49 fps ∼5% +4%
Huawei P10 Plus	19 fps ∼2% -60%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	50 fps ∼5% +6%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	46 fps ∼13%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	55.17 fps ∼15% +20%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	48 fps ∼13% +4%
Huawei P10 Plus	29 fps ∼8% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	38 fps ∼10% -17%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	35 fps ∼1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	41.3 fps ∼1% +18%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	32 fps ∼1% -9%
Huawei P10 Plus	22 fps ∼0% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	42 fps ∼1% +20%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	37 fps ∼1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	41.5 fps ∼1% +12%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	32 fps ∼1% -14%
Huawei P10 Plus	12 fps ∼0% -68%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	23 fps ∼1% -38%

GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	23 fps ∼5%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	19 fps ∼4% -17%
Huawei P10 Plus	15 fps ∼3% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	25 fps ∼6% +9%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	25 fps ∼9%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	19 fps ∼7% -24%
Huawei P10 Plus	10 fps ∼4% -60%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	13 fps ∼5% -48%

Legend

Sony Xperia XZ Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe

Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Huawei P10 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	168.08 Points ∼100% +173%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	62.198 Points ∼37% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	61.5 Points ∼37%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	59.8 Points ∼36% -3%
Huawei P10 Plus	58.427 Points ∼35% -5%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	26053 Points ∼100% +144%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	14050 Points ∼54% +32%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	10672 Points ∼41%
Huawei P10 Plus	10213 Points ∼39% -4%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	10007 Points ∼38% -6%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	3199 ms * ∼100%
Huawei P10 Plus	3107 ms * ∼97% +3%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	2399.8 ms * ∼75% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2236.7 ms * ∼70% +30%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1102.7 ms * ∼34% +66%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	204 Points ∼100% +37%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	154 Points ∼75% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	149 Points ∼73%
Huawei P10 Plus	140 Points ∼69% -6%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	107 Points ∼52% -28%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	59.04 MB/s ∼100% +77%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	57.24 MB/s ∼97% +72%
Huawei P10 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	33.61 MB/s ∼57% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	33.31 MB/s ∼56%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	77.77 MB/s ∼100% +111%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	71.12 MB/s ∼91% +93%
Huawei P10 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	54.04 MB/s ∼69% +47%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	36.79 MB/s ∼47%
Random Write 4KB
Huawei P10 Plus	149.78 MB/s ∼100% +771%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	17.2 MB/s ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	15.27 MB/s ∼10% -11%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	14.55 MB/s ∼10% -15%
Random Read 4KB
Huawei P10 Plus	173.06 MB/s ∼100% +134%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	127.18 MB/s ∼73% +72%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	100.87 MB/s ∼58% +36%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	74.1 MB/s ∼43%
Sequential Write 256KB
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	194.18 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	194 MB/s ∼100%
Huawei P10 Plus	182.64 MB/s ∼94% -6%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	163.05 MB/s ∼84% -16%
Sequential Read 256KB
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	787.6 MB/s ∼100% +15%
Huawei P10 Plus	732.94 MB/s ∼93% +7%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium	687 MB/s ∼87%
Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL	408.96 MB/s ∼52% -40%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Beállítások	Érték
	high	30 fps
	very low	30 fps

... összehasonlítva

Dead Trigger 2
	Beállítások	Érték
	high	60 fps

... összehasonlítva

Max. terhelés

Üresjárat


37.4 °C	38.3 °C	41.5 °C
37.5 °C	38.9 °C	42.1 °C
37.5 °C	39.4 °C	40.7 °C

Maximum: 42.1 °C
Átlag: 39.3 °C


37 °C	37.6 °C	37.5 °C
37.2 °C	37.5 °C	37.7 °C
37.8 °C	39.1 °C	39.5 °C

Maximum: 39.5 °C
Átlag: 37.9 °C

Tápegység (max.) 31.3 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Sony Xperia XZ Premium audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás

Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét	0.03 / 0.22 Watt
Üresjárat	0.62 / 2.44 / 2.59 Watt
Terhelés	4.94 / 7.91 Watt


Kulcs: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh	Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL 3000 mAh	Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh
Power Consumption		0%	0%	-30%	28%
Idle Minimum *	0.62	0.77 -24%	0.85 -37%	1.03 -66%	0.68 -10%
Idle Average *	2.44	2.04 16%	1.2 51%	2.61 -7%	1.13 54%
Idle Maximum *	2.59	2.24 14%	1.25 52%	2.83 -9%	1.16 55%
Load Average *	4.94	4.69 5%	6.97 -41%	7.03 -42%	4.69 5%
Load Maximum *	7.91	8.66 -9%	9.74 -23%	10.08 -27%	5.24 34%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő

Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)		29h 14min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		11h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 22min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)		3h 56min

	Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh	Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL 3000 mAh	Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh
Battery Runtime		-4%	-23%	-7%	1%
Reader / Idle	1754	1835 5%	1393 -21%	1655 -6%	1565 -11%
H.264	802	813 1%	799 0%	756 -6%	742 -7%
WiFi v1.3	695	587 -16%	463 -33%	760 9%	736 6%
Load	236	225 -5%	149 -37%	174 -26%	275 17%

Pro

+ jól kinéző üveg és fém ház

+ kiemelkedően jó 4K HDR kijelző

+ jó előlapi kamera

+ menő lassított felvételek

+ nagy felbontású audio kompatibilitás

+ víz- és porálló

+ naprakész operációs rendszer

+ 3.5 mm kombi audio

+ gyors Wi-Fi

+ sok LTE frekvencia

+ jó üzemidő

+ nagy teljesítmény

Kontra

- nyomásérzékeny előlap

- széles keretek

- a fő kamera élessége nem jó

- a szuperlassú felvételek erősen időkorlátosak

- bloatware

- a Wi-Fi vétel csak a router közelében jó

- a GPS modul kissé lassú

- közepes és zajos hívásminőség

- kissé kék kijelzőkép

- lassú microSD olvasó

Review: Sony Xperia XZ Premium. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Oh Sony, milyen remek, hogy már másodszor készítesz innovatív technológiákkal megpakolt csúcstelefont. Az Xperia XZ Premium nagy felbontású hanggal, a megfelelő fejhallgatók mellett zajcsökkentéssel, és remek lassított felvétel funkcióval van ellátva. Mindezt csak pár dollárral drágábban az Xperia XZ-hez képest. Ezen felül jó üzemidőt és fenomenális HDR kijelzőt is kapunk, amely remélhetőleg alapértelmezett lesz a felső kategóriás készülékekben. Hát, még ha a Sony AMOLED kijelzőt használt volna...

Az viszont szomorú, hogy a technikai újítások mellett kívülről némileg elavultnak néz ki: a ház nehéz, és bár elegáns, mégis könnyen hajlik. A széles keretek sem segítenek, hogy a készülék modernnek tűnjön. Ezen felül a telefon háttértára csak alapszintű, a GPS lassú, a Wi-Fi vétel a routertől távolabb nem tökéletes és a hívásminőség sem éppen jó. A tartozékok közül hiányzik a gyorstöltő és az olcsó headset nem méltó egy csúcstelefonhoz.

Az Xperia XZ Premium sok új technológiával felvértezett készülék, amely bizonyítja, hogy a 4K videók és HDR még egy okostelefon kijelzőjén is jól néznek ki. Megfelelő üzemidővel és lassított felvétel funkcióval is rendelkezik, de a Sony több energiát fektethetett volna az alap képességekbe, például a hívásminőségbe és a Wi-Fi vételbe.

Ha a Sony kicsivel bátrabb lett volna, az Xperia XZ Premium a riválisokat háttérbe szorító, kiemelkedő okostelefon lehetne. Így csak egy a sok felső kategóriás telefon közül, néhány figyelemre méltó technológiai részlettel. Közel sem azt mondjuk, hogy a Sony Xperia XZ Premium nem egy jó okostelefon, fantasztikus HDR kijelzővel. A Sony azonban talán kissé megfeledkezett az alapvető dolgokról a sok technikai újítás mellett.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Sony Xperia XZ Premium - 2017-07-1207/12/2017 v6^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Váz

92%

Billentyűzet

67 / 75 → 90%

Érintőpad

93%

Csatlakoztathatóság

49 / 60 → 82%

Súly

89%