Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact Smartphone rövid értékelés
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 1/4" Exmor R, 18 mm-es nagylátószögű (120 fokos látószöggel)
» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
Apple iPhone 8 |
|
Fényerő megoszlás: 98 %
Centrumban: 566 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1068:1 (Fekete: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
Gamma: 2.14
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact IPS, 1280x720, 4.60 | Apple iPhone 8 IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.70 | OnePlus 5 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50 | Xiaomi Mi 6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15 | Samsung Galaxy S8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.80 | Sony Xperia XZ1 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 34% | 24% | 23% | 22% | 3% | |
Brightness middle | 566 | 604 7% | 426 -25% | 620 10% | 566 0% | 620 10% |
Brightness | 560 | 580 4% | 431 -23% | 586 5% | 564 1% | 610 9% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 91 -7% | 93 -5% | 89 -9% | 94 -4% | 93 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.53 | 0.44 17% | 0.28 47% | 0.79 -49% | ||
Contrast | 1068 | 1373 29% | 2214 107% | 785 -26% | ||
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.6 | 1.2 74% | 1.6 65% | 4.8 -4% | 2.7 41% | 4.2 9% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 9.4 | 2.3 76% | 4.1 56% | 8.8 6% | 5.4 43% | 5.8 38% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 6.5 | 1.6 75% | 1.7 74% | 5.3 18% | 3.1 52% | 3.9 40% |
Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.15 102% | 2.02 109% |
CCT | 8189 79% | 6688 97% | 6329 103% | 7473 87% | 6335 103% | 7086 92% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2358 Hz | ≤ 25 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9686 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 29 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27 ms rise | |
↘ 29 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.5 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 |
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 |
GFXBench | |
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
OnePlus 5 | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58) | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58) | |
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
Apple iPhone 8 |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score | |
Apple iPhone 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84) | |
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) |
* ... smaller is better
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | OnePlus 5 | Xiaomi Mi 6 | Samsung Galaxy S8 | Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 29% | 37% | 13% | 14% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 50.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 53.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 7% | 47.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5% | ||
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 73.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 63.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -13% | 65.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -11% | ||
Random Write 4KB | 17.13 | 19.3 13% | 25.19 47% | 15.25 -11% | 14.93 -13% |
Random Read 4KB | 113.29 | 141 24% | 143.49 27% | 127.17 12% | 156.61 38% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 119.89 | 201.5 68% | 196.7 64% | 193.23 61% | 204.43 71% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 667.75 | 748 12% | 728.2 9% | 792.86 19% | 679.13 2% |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Beállítások | Érték | ||
high | 60 fps |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Beállítások | Érték | ||
high | 30 fps | ||
very low | 30 fps |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Apple iPhone 8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Samsung Galaxy S8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.44 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | ![]() ![]() |
Üresjárat | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Terhelés |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Kulcs:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact 2700 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 6 3350 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ1 2700 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 19% | 1% | 15% | 23% | -11% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.58 | 0.54 7% | 0.73 -26% | 0.45 22% | 0.78 -34% | 0.51 12% |
Idle Average * | 1.76 | 1.63 7% | 1.44 18% | 1.67 5% | 1.1 37% | 2.16 -23% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.81 | 1.67 8% | 1.5 17% | 1.69 7% | 1.16 36% | 2.23 -23% |
Load Average * | 6.33 | 2.74 57% | 6.91 -9% | 4.07 36% | 4.15 34% | 7.45 -18% |
Load Maximum * | 9.18 | 7.78 15% | 8.51 7% | 8.54 7% | 5.12 44% | 9.28 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact 2700 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 6 3350 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ1 2700 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -26% | -27% | 0% | -13% | -31% | |
Reader / Idle | 2655 | 1629 -39% | 1534 -42% | 1667 -37% | 1612 -39% | |
H.264 | 866 | 698 -19% | 623 -28% | 771 -11% | 580 -33% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 736 | 585 -21% | 518 -30% | 739 0% | 719 -2% | 601 -18% |
Load | 266 | 202 -24% | 247 -7% | 264 -1% | 172 -35% |
Pro
Kontra
Az Xperia XZ1 Compact egy 4.6 inches prémium okostelefon; ez a méret kategóriájában szokatlan. Azoknak jó hír a Sony 599 dolláros készüléke, akik egy olyan csúcstelefont szeretnének, amelyet még egy kézzel lehet kezelni. Az Xperia XZ1 Compact ráadásul ennél sokkal többet nyújt.
Az előnyei közé tartotik az op. rendszer, hiszen az Xperia XZ1 Compact jelenleg az egyetlen Android 8.0-ás telefon. Ehhez jön még a gyors WiFi, jó kamera, remek hangzású hangszóró, világos HD kijelző és meglepően hosszú üzemidő. A burkolat alatt a Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 gondoskodik az akadásmentes használatról.
Kis méret, csúcs hardver, és Android 8.0 – ez így együtt jelenleg csak Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact-ban van meg.
Gyakorlatilag alig van panaszunk az Xperia XZ1 Compact-ra. A nem kivehető telep nem akkora hiányosság. A ház nagyobb probléma lehet, éles szegélyeivel, és viszonylag széles felső és alsó kereteivel. Valószínűleg nem mindenkinek fog tetszeni ez a külső.
Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact - 11/28/2017 v6(old)
Manuel Masiero