Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact Smartphone rövid értékelés

Name: Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Brand: Sony

Báránybőrbe bújt farkas. Bár a Sony Xperia XZ1 a jelentéktelenség megtestesítője 4.6 inches kijelzőjével, mégis egy első osztályú okostelefon, amely megállja a helyét olyan nagyágyúkkal szemben is, mint az Apple iPhone 8. Ezen felül az egyik első Android 8.0-ás okostelefon. Cikkünkben mindent elmondunk a Sony kis erőművészéről.

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 12/04/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact Adreno 540, SD 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	669 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	651 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 5 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	539 MBit/s ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 6 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	500 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	500 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
Apple iPhone 8 A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)	354 MBit/s ∼53% -47%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 8 A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)	915 MBit/s ∼100% +76%
Xiaomi Mi 6 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	574 MBit/s ∼63% +10%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact Adreno 540, SD 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	521 MBit/s ∼57%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	489 MBit/s ∼53% -6%
OnePlus 5 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	371 MBit/s ∼41% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	329 MBit/s ∼36% -37%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy Note 8

OnePlus 5

click to load images

Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy Note 8

OnePlus 5

click to load images

Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy Note 8

OnePlus 5


553 cd/m²	553 cd/m²	559 cd/m²
556 cd/m²	566 cd/m²	562 cd/m²
565 cd/m²	563 cd/m²	567 cd/m²

Fényerő megoszlás

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 567 cd/m² Átlag: 560.4 cd/m² Minimum: 5.08 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 98 %
Centrumban: 566 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1068:1 (Fekete: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8Gamma: 2.14

	Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact IPS, 1280x720, 4.60	Apple iPhone 8 IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.70	OnePlus 5 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50	Xiaomi Mi 6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15	Samsung Galaxy S8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.80	Sony Xperia XZ1 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
Screen		34%	24%	23%	22%	3%
Brightness middle	566	604 7%	426 -25%	620 10%	566 0%	620 10%
Brightness	560	580 4%	431 -23%	586 5%	564 1%	610 9%
Brightness Distribution	98	91 -7%	93 -5%	89 -9%	94 -4%	93 -5%
Black Level *	0.53	0.44 17%		0.28 47%		0.79 -49%
Contrast	1068	1373 29%		2214 107%		785 -26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	4.6	1.2 74%	1.6 65%	4.8 -4%	2.7 41%	4.2 9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	9.4	2.3 76%	4.1 56%	8.8 6%	5.4 43%	5.8 38%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	6.5	1.6 75%	1.7 74%	5.3 18%	3.1 52%	3.9 40%
Gamma	2.14 ^103%	2.25 ^98%	2.25 ^98%	2.25 ^98%	2.15 ^102%	2.02 ^109%
CCT	8189 ^79%	6688 ^97%	6329 ^103%	7473 ^87%	6335 ^103%	7086 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)					81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)					99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2358 Hz

≤ 25 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9726 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 29 ms rise
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 27 ms rise
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.2 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	150208 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone 8	204270 Points ∼70% +36%
OnePlus 5	177156 Points ∼60% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 6	181909 Points ∼62% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S8	171884 Points ∼59% +14%
Sony Xperia XZ1	167748 Points ∼57% +12%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	7496 Points ∼38%
OnePlus 5	7826 Points ∼39% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 6	7548 Points ∼38% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8	6035 Points ∼30% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ1	7056 Points ∼35% -6%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	6421 Points ∼42%
OnePlus 5	6579 Points ∼43% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 6	6686 Points ∼44% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8	5370 Points ∼35% -16%
Sony Xperia XZ1	6443 Points ∼42% 0%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	2739 Points ∼32%
OnePlus 5	3790 Points ∼45% +38%
Xiaomi Mi 6	3694 Points ∼44% +35%
Samsung Galaxy S8	3277 Points ∼39% +20%
Sony Xperia XZ1	2909 Points ∼34% +6%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	5336 Points ∼32%
OnePlus 5	5902 Points ∼36% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 6	5857 Points ∼36% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S8	5386 Points ∼33% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ1	5840 Points ∼35% +9%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	1501 Points ∼17%
OnePlus 5	4423 Points ∼49% +195%
Xiaomi Mi 6	4054 Points ∼45% +170%
Samsung Galaxy S8	3039 Points ∼34% +102%
Sony Xperia XZ1	1752 Points ∼19% +17%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	5791 Points ∼20%
OnePlus 5	6144 Points ∼21% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 6	6206 Points ∼22% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S8	6096 Points ∼21% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ1	5923 Points ∼21% +2%
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	1213 Points ∼56%
OnePlus 5	1287 Points ∼59% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 6	1263 Points ∼58% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8	1156 Points ∼53% -5%
Sony Xperia XZ1	1181 Points ∼54% -3%

Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	1915 Points ∼23%
Apple iPhone 8	4162 Points ∼51% +117%
OnePlus 5	1973 Points ∼24% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 6	1938 Points ∼24% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8	1997 Points ∼24% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ1	1856 Points ∼23% -3%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	6541 Points ∼10%
Apple iPhone 8	10380 Points ∼16% +59%
OnePlus 5	6799 Points ∼11% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 6	6714 Points ∼11% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S8	6711 Points ∼11% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ1	6493 Points ∼10% -1%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5	8005 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy S8	8490 Points ∼19%
Sony Xperia XZ1	7979 Points ∼18%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	41396 Points ∼15%
Apple iPhone 8	62006 Points ∼22% +50%
OnePlus 5	40229 Points ∼14% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 6	41172 Points ∼15% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8	31532 Points ∼11% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ1	31618 Points ∼11% -24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	54415 Points ∼8%
Apple iPhone 8	112424 Points ∼17% +107%
OnePlus 5	58001 Points ∼9% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 6	58228 Points ∼9% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S8	36347 Points ∼6% -33%
Sony Xperia XZ1	47857 Points ∼7% -12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	22530 Points ∼23%
Apple iPhone 8	24131 Points ∼25% +7%
OnePlus 5	19411 Points ∼20% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 6	20330 Points ∼21% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S8	21543 Points ∼22% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ1	23046 Points ∼24% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	4705 Points ∼42%
OnePlus 5	4219 Points ∼37% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 6	4978 Points ∼44% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S8	4015 Points ∼36% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ1	4649 Points ∼41% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	6007 Points ∼36%
OnePlus 5	4765 Points ∼29% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 6	6231 Points ∼37% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8	4923 Points ∼30% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ1	6057 Points ∼36% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	2675 Points ∼49%
Apple iPhone 8	1774 Points ∼33% -34%
OnePlus 5	3012 Points ∼56% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 6	2921 Points ∼54% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S8	2440 Points ∼45% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ1	2564 Points ∼47% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	3549 Points ∼17%
Apple iPhone 8	2421 Points ∼12% -32%
OnePlus 5	3566 Points ∼18% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 6	3775 Points ∼19% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S8	3194 Points ∼16% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ1	3673 Points ∼18% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	3925 Points ∼34%
Apple iPhone 8	2581 Points ∼22% -34%
OnePlus 5	3757 Points ∼32% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 6	4072 Points ∼35% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8	3472 Points ∼30% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ1	3961 Points ∼34% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	2658 Points ∼45%
Apple iPhone 8	1989 Points ∼34% -25%
OnePlus 5	3026 Points ∼51% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 6	3007 Points ∼51% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S8	2494 Points ∼42% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ1	2928 Points ∼50% +10%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	60 fps ∼2%
Apple iPhone 8	119.8 fps ∼4% +100%
OnePlus 5	60 fps ∼2% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 6	60 fps ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8	60 fps ∼2% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1	60 fps ∼2% 0%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8	161.3 fps ∼1%
OnePlus 5	115 fps ∼1%
Xiaomi Mi 6	119 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S8	121 fps ∼1%
Sony Xperia XZ1	111 fps ∼1%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	58 fps ∼16%
Apple iPhone 8	114.5 fps ∼31% +97%
OnePlus 5	56 fps ∼15% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 6	56 fps ∼15% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8	41 fps ∼11% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ1	52 fps ∼14% -10%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	53 fps ∼6%
Apple iPhone 8	70.8 fps ∼8% +34%
OnePlus 5	61 fps ∼7% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 6	63 fps ∼7% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S8	62 fps ∼7% +17%
Sony Xperia XZ1	56 fps ∼6% +6%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	59 fps ∼2%
Apple iPhone 8	109.7 fps ∼3% +86%
OnePlus 5	41 fps ∼1% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 6	42 fps ∼1% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S8	23 fps ∼1% -61%
Sony Xperia XZ1	42 fps ∼1% -29%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	40 fps ∼1%
Apple iPhone 8	54 fps ∼1% +35%
OnePlus 5	42 fps ∼1% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 6	43 fps ∼1% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8	24 fps ∼1% -40%
Sony Xperia XZ1	41 fps ∼1% +3%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	50 fps ∼19%
OnePlus 5	25 fps ∼9% -50%
Xiaomi Mi 6	26 fps ∼10% -48%
Samsung Galaxy S8	13 fps ∼5% -74%
Sony Xperia XZ1	25 fps ∼9% -50%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	24 fps ∼6%
OnePlus 5	25 fps ∼6% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 6	26 fps ∼6% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8	25 fps ∼6% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ1	24 fps ∼6% 0%

Legend

Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)

OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Xiaomi Mi 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Sony Xperia XZ1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8	206.7 Points ∼100% +225%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	71.6 Points ∼35% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)	70.453 Points ∼34% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)	65.846 Points ∼32% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84)	63.675 Points ∼31%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)	61.335 Points ∼30% -4%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8	34163 Points ∼100% +199%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)	12941 Points ∼38% +13%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	11945 Points ∼35% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)	11909 Points ∼35% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84)	11424 Points ∼33%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)	10096 Points ∼30% -12%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84)	3393.2 ms * ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)	3267.9 ms * ∼96% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)	2667.5 ms * ∼79% +21%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	2621.7 ms * ∼77% +23%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)	1886.6 ms * ∼56% +44%
Apple iPhone 8	730.8 ms * ∼22% +78%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 8	359 Points ∼100% +116%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)	194 Points ∼54% +17%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)	170 Points ∼47% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84)	166 Points ∼46%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	161 Points ∼45% -3%

* ... smaller is better

	Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact	OnePlus 5	Xiaomi Mi 6	Samsung Galaxy S8	Sony Xperia XZ1
AndroBench 3-5		29%	37%	13%	14%
Sequential Read 256KB	667.75	748 12%	728.2 9%	792.86 19%	679.13 2%
Sequential Write 256KB	119.89	201.5 68%	196.7 64%	193.23 61%	204.43 71%
Random Read 4KB	113.29	141 24%	143.49 27%	127.17 12%	156.61 38%
Random Write 4KB	17.13	19.3 13%	25.19 47%	15.25 -11%	14.93 -13%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	73.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)			63.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -13%	65.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -11%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	50.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)			53.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 7%	47.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%

Dead Trigger 2
	Beállítások	Érték
	high	60 fps

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Beállítások	Érték
	high	30 fps
	very low	30 fps

... összehasonlítva

Max. terhelés

Üresjárat


37.2 °C	37.4 °C	39.7 °C
36.8 °C	37.6 °C	39.5 °C
31.5 °C	36.3 °C	38.4 °C

Maximum: 39.7 °C
Átlag: 37.2 °C


35.4 °C	37.7 °C	37.3 °C
35.3 °C	37.2 °C	37.7 °C
33.1 °C	35.2 °C	34.7 °C

Maximum: 37.7 °C
Átlag: 36 °C

Tápegység (max.) 28.1 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.44 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás

Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét	0.02 / 0.24 Watt
Üresjárat	0.58 / 1.76 / 1.81 Watt
Terhelés	6.33 / 9.18 Watt


Kulcs: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact 2700 mAh	Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh	OnePlus 5 3300 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 6 3350 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ1 2700 mAh
Power Consumption		19%	1%	15%	23%	-11%
Idle Minimum *	0.58	0.54 7%	0.73 -26%	0.45 22%	0.78 -34%	0.51 12%
Idle Average *	1.76	1.63 7%	1.44 18%	1.67 5%	1.1 37%	2.16 -23%
Idle Maximum *	1.81	1.67 8%	1.5 17%	1.69 7%	1.16 36%	2.23 -23%
Load Average *	6.33	2.74 57%	6.91 -9%	4.07 36%	4.15 34%	7.45 -18%
Load Maximum *	9.18	7.78 15%	8.51 7%	8.54 7%	5.12 44%	9.28 -1%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő

Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)		44h 15min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		12h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 26min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)		4h 26min

	Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact 2700 mAh	Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh	OnePlus 5 3300 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 6 3350 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ1 2700 mAh
Battery Runtime		-26%	-27%	0%	-13%	-31%
Reader / Idle	2655	1629 -39%	1534 -42%		1667 -37%	1612 -39%
H.264	866	698 -19%	623 -28%		771 -11%	580 -33%
WiFi v1.3	736	585 -21%	518 -30%	739 0%	719 -2%	601 -18%
Load	266	202 -24%	247 -7%		264 -1%	172 -35%

Pro

+ nagyon gyors

+ strapabíró, kiváló minőségű ház

+ por- és cseppálló

+ Android 8.0

+ gyors Wi-Fi

+ precíz GPS

+ jó kamera

+ világos kijelző

+ hosszú üzemidő

+ gyorstöltő funkció

Kontra

- éles ház

- csak USB 2.0

- PWM

- a gyenge töltő lassítja a feltöltődését

Review: Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact. Test unit provided by

Az Xperia XZ1 Compact egy 4.6 inches prémium okostelefon; ez a méret kategóriájában szokatlan. Azoknak jó hír a Sony 599 dolláros készüléke, akik egy olyan csúcstelefont szeretnének, amelyet még egy kézzel lehet kezelni. Az Xperia XZ1 Compact ráadásul ennél sokkal többet nyújt.

Az előnyei közé tartotik az op. rendszer, hiszen az Xperia XZ1 Compact jelenleg az egyetlen Android 8.0-ás telefon. Ehhez jön még a gyors WiFi, jó kamera, remek hangzású hangszóró, világos HD kijelző és meglepően hosszú üzemidő. A burkolat alatt a Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 gondoskodik az akadásmentes használatról.

Kis méret, csúcs hardver, és Android 8.0 – ez így együtt jelenleg csak Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact-ban van meg.

Gyakorlatilag alig van panaszunk az Xperia XZ1 Compact-ra. A nem kivehető telep nem akkora hiányosság. A ház nagyobb probléma lehet, éles szegélyeivel, és viszonylag széles felső és alsó kereteivel. Valószínűleg nem mindenkinek fog tetszeni ez a külső.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact - 2017-11-28 11/28/2017 v6^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Váz

88%

Billentyűzet

65 / 75 → 87%

Érintőpad

92%

Csatlakoztathatóság

53 / 60 → 88%

Súly

93%