Notebookcheck

Huawei Mate 9 Phablet rövid értékelés

Gondolkodjunk nagyban! Érdemes figyelmet szentelni a Huawei legújabb termékének, ha az ember szereti a nagy, csúcskategóriás phableteket. Az új Kirin 960-on kívül két kamerát, modern Android 7.0-t (az új EMUI 5.0-val), és egy nagy akkumulátort is kapunk. A készülék legnagyobb erénye az 5.9 inches IPS display. Egy jó eszköz, nem vitás, de az értékelésünkből az is kiderül, hogy milyen gondok vannak vele.
Daniel Schmidt, Manuel Masiero (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen Phablet
, , , , , ,
hasonló találatok
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Huawei Mate 9 (Mate Széria)
Processzor
HiSilicon Kirin 960 8 x 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-G71 MP8, Mag: 900 MHz
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4-1800
Kijelző
5.90 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 373 PPI, kapacitív érintőkijelző, 10 pontos multi-touch, IPS, kék fény szűrő (éjszakai mód), fényes: igen
Háttértár
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 49.55 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: kombinált fejhallgató és mikrofon csatlakozó (3.5 mm sztereó jack), Kártyaolvasó: MicroSD 256 GB-ig bővíthető (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: helyzetérzékelő, gyorsulásmérő, irányérzékelő és G-szenzor, iránytű, barométer, OTG, DLNA, Miracast, IR adatátvitel
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GSP/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (sávok: 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 19), LTE Cat. 11 (sávok: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29 (all FDD), 38, 39, 40, 41 (TDD)), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.9 x 156.9 x 78.9
Akkumulátor
4000 mAh Lítium-Polimer, Beszédidő 3G (gyártói adat): 30 h, Készenlét 3G (gyártói adat): 504 h
Operációs rendszer
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix monokróm szenzor + 12 MP RGB szenzor Leica kettős kamera, hibrid-AF, OIS, hibrid-Zoom, 2-színű vaku, Ultra HD-videó
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (AF, 1080p-Video)
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: két hangszóró, Billentyűzet: virtuális, hálózati adapter, USB kábel, SIM tű, OTG adapter, quick-start útmutató, védőtok, EMUI 5.0, Phone Manager, HiCare, Facebook, Smart Controller, Twitter, Todolist, WPS Office, 24 Hónap Garancia, USB Type-C, gyorstöltő, 4 mikrofon zajszűréssel, SAR (fej): 1.64 W/kg, SAR (test): 1.36 W/kg, fanless
Súly
192 g, Tápegység: 101 g
Ár
699 Euró
Hivatkozások
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

158.2 mm 77.9 mm 7.3 mm 188 g157.1 mm 80.6 mm 7.9 mm 185 g156.9 mm 78.9 mm 7.9 mm 192 g153.2 mm 76.1 mm 7.6 mm 171 g151.9 mm 78.4 mm 8.3 mm 165 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
485 MBit/s ∼100% +194%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
435 MBit/s ∼90% +164%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s ∼69% +103%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
256 MBit/s ∼53% +55%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
165 MBit/s ∼34%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
532 MBit/s ∼100% +105%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
515 MBit/s ∼97% +99%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s ∼53% +8%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
259 MBit/s ∼49%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
257 MBit/s ∼48% -1%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Huawei Mate 9
Huawei Mate 9
Huawei Mate 9
Huawei Mate 9
Huawei Mate 9
Huawei Mate 9

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
12 MP (both sensors combined)
12 MP (both sensors combined)
20 MP (both sensors combined)
both sensors combined (2x hybrid zoom)
20 MP (only monochrome sensor)
681
cd/m²
675
cd/m²
692
cd/m²
683
cd/m²
696
cd/m²
700
cd/m²
686
cd/m²
657
cd/m²
653
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 700 cd/m² Átlag: 680.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.3 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 93 %
Centrumban: 696 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1657:1 (Fekete: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
Gamma: 2.33
Huawei Mate 9
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.90
Huawei Mate 8
IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 6.00
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Google Pixel XL 2016
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50
LG G5
IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.30
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.70
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.70
Screen
-8%
23%
-10%
-14%
7%
4%
Brightness middle
696
514
-26%
557
-20%
402
-42%
784
13%
394.8
-43%
297
-57%
Brightness
680
513
-25%
553
-19%
408
-40%
774
14%
397
-42%
297
-56%
Brightness Distribution
93
94
1%
97
4%
85
-9%
91
-2%
91
-2%
93
0%
Black Level *
0.42
0.35
17%
0.35
17%
0.43
-2%
Contrast
1657
1469
-11%
1591
-4%
1823
10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.3
5.08
-18%
1.4
67%
4
7%
6.5
-51%
1.49
65%
2.67
38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.4
8.28
12%
3.1
67%
10.1
-7%
11.7
-24%
3.98
58%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
5.49
-14%
1.3
73%
3.2
33%
8
-67%
1.98
59%
2.81
41%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.08 106%
2.21 100%
2.19 100%
2.22 99%
2.19 100%
2.08 106%
CCT
7255 90%
7254 90%
6667 97%
7037 92%
8699 75%
6382 102%
6379 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
79.95
63.1
68.08
66.31
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.84
99.83
97.46
99.79

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9709 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
57 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 43 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.3 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
124087 Points ∼42%
Huawei Mate 8
93767 Points ∼32% -24%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
94122 Points ∼32% -24%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
165399 Points ∼56% +33%
Google Pixel XL 2016
138641 Points ∼47% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼44% +4%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼44% +4%
Huawei P9
95743 Points ∼33% -23%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
1947 Points ∼30%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3476 Points ∼54% +79%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1513 Points ∼23% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1840 Points ∼28% -5%
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points ∼23% -24%
Huawei P9
1755 Points ∼27% -10%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
5629 Points ∼14%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
5630 Points ∼14% 0%
Google Pixel XL 2016
4167 Points ∼10% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
5503 Points ∼13% -2%
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points ∼10% -30%
Huawei P9
4904 Points ∼12% -13%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
27364 Points ∼10%
Huawei Mate 8
19179 Points ∼7% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
24020 Points ∼8% -12%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
37746 Points ∼13% +38%
Google Pixel XL 2016
27766 Points ∼10% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points ∼10% +5%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points ∼9% -8%
Huawei P9
19854 Points ∼7% -27%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
35626 Points ∼6%
Huawei Mate 8
20537 Points ∼3% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
26964 Points ∼4% -24%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
63386 Points ∼10% +78%
Google Pixel XL 2016
32652 Points ∼5% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points ∼5% -7%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points ∼4% -25%
Huawei P9
21577 Points ∼3% -39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
15104 Points ∼16%
Huawei Mate 8
15575 Points ∼16% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
17380 Points ∼18% +15%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
15626 Points ∼16% +3%
Google Pixel XL 2016
18222 Points ∼19% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points ∼20% +30%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points ∼22% +39%
Huawei P9
15517 Points ∼16% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2367 Points ∼21%
Huawei Mate 8
1244 Points ∼11% -47%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
1488 Points ∼13% -37%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3034 Points ∼27% +28%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3180 Points ∼28% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (2421min) Points ∼24% +14%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points ∼27% +28%
Huawei P9
1237 Points ∼11% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2448 Points ∼15%
Huawei Mate 8
1092 Points ∼7% -55%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
1471 Points ∼9% -40%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
4235 Points ∼25% +73%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3935 Points ∼24% +61%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (2895min) Points ∼18% +23%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points ∼22% +52%
Huawei P9
1080 Points ∼6% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2123 Points ∼39%
Huawei Mate 8
2432 Points ∼45% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
1552 Points ∼29% -27%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1522 Points ∼28% -28%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1902 Points ∼35% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (1539min) Points ∼37% -6%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points ∼34% -14%
Huawei P9
2510 Points ∼46% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2240 Points ∼11%
Huawei Mate 8
945 Points ∼5% -58%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
1232 Points ∼6% -45%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2560 Points ∼13% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (1923min) Points ∼11% -2%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼11% -2%
Huawei P9
974 Points ∼5% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2294 Points ∼20%
Huawei Mate 8
801 Points ∼7% -65%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
1155 Points ∼10% -50%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2820 Points ∼24% +23%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (2043min) Points ∼19% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z
2336 Points ∼20% +2%
Huawei P9
829 Points ∼7% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2117 Points ∼36%
Huawei Mate 8
2552 Points ∼43% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
1606 Points ∼27% -24%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1935 Points ∼33% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (1594min) Points ∼36% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z
1797 Points ∼30% -15%
Huawei P9
2503 Points ∼42% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2343 Points ∼17%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3371 Points ∼25% +44%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3483 Points ∼25% +49%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2641 Points ∼19% +13%
Lenovo Moto Z
3151 Points ∼23% +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2421 Points ∼7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
5141 Points ∼14% +112%
Google Pixel XL 2016
4406 Points ∼12% +82%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3071 Points ∼9% +27%
Lenovo Moto Z
3930 Points ∼11% +62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2104 Points ∼31%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1528 Points ∼22% -27%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2009 Points ∼29% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1773 Points ∼26% -16%
Lenovo Moto Z
1860 Points ∼27% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2108 Points ∼21%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2629 Points ∼27% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2234 Points ∼23% +6%
Lenovo Moto Z
2363 Points ∼24% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2142 Points ∼8%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2863 Points ∼11% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2394 Points ∼9% +12%
Lenovo Moto Z
2588 Points ∼10% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
1997 Points ∼25%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2044 Points ∼26% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1811 Points ∼23% -9%
Lenovo Moto Z
1813 Points ∼23% -9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
60 fps ∼2%
Huawei Mate 8
44 fps ∼1% -27%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
18.75 fps ∼1% -69%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
57.71 fps ∼2% -4%
Google Pixel XL 2016
55 fps ∼2% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps ∼2% -15%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼2% -12%
Huawei P9
43 fps ∼1% -28%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
80 fps ∼1%
Huawei Mate 8
41 fps ∼0% -49%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
27.11 fps ∼0% -66%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
91.96 fps ∼1% +15%
Google Pixel XL 2016
91 fps ∼1% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps ∼1% +1%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼1% -4%
Huawei P9
40 fps ∼0% -50%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
37 fps ∼10%
Huawei Mate 8
19 fps ∼5% -49%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
11 fps ∼3% -70%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
11.81 fps ∼3% -68%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
55.17 fps ∼15% +49%
Google Pixel XL 2016
30 fps ∼8% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps ∼7% -27%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼7% -30%
Huawei P9
19 fps ∼5% -49%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
34 fps ∼4%
Huawei Mate 8
18 fps ∼2% -47%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
18 fps ∼2% -47%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
17.54 fps ∼2% -48%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
58.71 fps ∼6% +73%
Google Pixel XL 2016
48 fps ∼5% +41%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps ∼4% +12%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼4% +21%
Huawei P9
18 fps ∼2% -47%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
28 fps ∼1%
Huawei Mate 8
11 fps ∼0% -61%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.5 fps ∼1% +48%
Google Pixel XL 2016
17 fps ∼0% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼0% -46%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼0% -46%
Huawei P9
11 fps ∼0% -61%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
24 fps ∼1%
Huawei Mate 8
10 fps ∼0% -58%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.3 fps ∼1% +72%
Google Pixel XL 2016
32 fps ∼1% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼1% +17%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼1% +13%
Huawei P9
10 fps ∼0% -58%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
7403 Points ∼37%
Huawei Mate 8
7344 Points ∼37% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
5113 Points ∼26% -31%
Google Pixel XL 2016
4739 Points ∼24% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼23% -37%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points ∼38% +3%
Huawei P9
7058 Points ∼35% -5%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2772 Points ∼33%
Huawei Mate 8
2046 Points ∼24% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
1746 Points ∼21% -37%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1465 Points ∼17% -47%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3097 Points ∼37% +12%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2378 Points ∼28% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼25% -25%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼28% -15%
Huawei P9
2025 Points ∼24% -27%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
3616 Points ∼22%
Huawei Mate 8
4064 Points ∼25% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
3305 Points ∼20% -9%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1386 Points ∼8% -62%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6582 Points ∼40% +82%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3889 Points ∼24% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼25% +13%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼21% -6%
Huawei P9
3930 Points ∼24% +9%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
3850 Points ∼43%
Huawei Mate 8
2339 Points ∼26% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
1138 Points ∼13% -70%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1945 Points ∼22% -49%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1319 Points ∼15% -66%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1677 Points ∼19% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼23% -46%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼24% -43%
Huawei P9
2627 Points ∼29% -32%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
3939 Points ∼14%
Huawei Mate 8
1636 Points ∼6% -58%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
2476 Points ∼9% -37%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2040 Points ∼7% -48%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6875 Points ∼24% +75%
Google Pixel XL 2016
5017 Points ∼17% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼8% -44%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼15% +10%
Huawei P9
1583 Points ∼5% -60%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
1076 Points ∼50%
Huawei Mate 8
1127 Points ∼52% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
998 Points ∼46% -7%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
837 Points ∼39% -22%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1542 Points ∼71% +43%
Google Pixel XL 2016
977 Points ∼45% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼46% -8%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼44% -11%
Huawei P9
1029 Points ∼47% -4%
Basemark X 1.1
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
42176 Points ∼94%
Huawei Mate 8
29659 Points ∼66% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
36533 Points ∼81% -13%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
33082 Points ∼74% -22%
Google Pixel XL 2016
34695 Points ∼77% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
41091 Points ∼91% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z
41445 Points ∼92% -2%
Huawei P9
29662 Points ∼66% -30%
High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
31104 Points ∼71%
Huawei Mate 8
16688 Points ∼38% -46%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
26108 Points ∼59% -16%
Google Pixel XL 2016
30724 Points ∼70% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
32273 Points ∼73% +4%
Lenovo Moto Z
33028 Points ∼75% +6%
Huawei P9
16610 Points ∼38% -47%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
699 Points ∼11%
Huawei Mate 8
347 Points ∼5% -50%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1177 Points ∼18% +68%
Google Pixel XL 2016
621 Points ∼10% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
733 Points ∼11% +5%
Lenovo Moto Z
542 Points ∼8% -22%
Huawei P9
328 Points ∼5% -53%
ANDEBench PRO
Device Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
16616 Points ∼64%
Huawei Mate 8
11703 Points ∼45% -30%
Google Pixel XL 2016
14128 Points ∼54% -15%
Lenovo Moto Z
15951 Points ∼61% -4%
Huawei P9
13100 Points ∼50% -21%
CoreMark-PRO/HPC (Base) (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
5902 Points ∼92%
Huawei Mate 8
5664 Points ∼88% -4%
Google Pixel XL 2016
5452 Points ∼85% -8%
Lenovo Moto Z
4834 Points ∼75% -18%
Huawei P9
5919 Points ∼92% 0%
Memory Bandwidth (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
20696 MB/s ∼98%
Huawei Mate 8
10559 MB/s ∼50% -49%
Google Pixel XL 2016
18672 MB/s ∼89% -10%
Lenovo Moto Z
19176 MB/s ∼91% -7%
Huawei P9
8721 MB/s ∼41% -58%
Memory Latency (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
6318 KOps/s ∼78%
Huawei Mate 8
4981 KOps/s ∼62% -21%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1948 KOps/s ∼24% -69%
Lenovo Moto Z
5740 KOps/s ∼71% -9%
Huawei P9
4614 KOps/s ∼57% -27%
Storage (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
12783 KB/s ∼12%
Huawei Mate 8
9634 KB/s ∼9% -25%
Google Pixel XL 2016
19319 KB/s ∼19% +51%
Lenovo Moto Z
14580 KB/s ∼14% +14%
Huawei P9
10534 KB/s ∼10% -18%
Platform (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
489 Points ∼7%
Huawei Mate 8
286 Points ∼4% -42%
Google Pixel XL 2016
253.2 Points ∼4% -48%
Lenovo Moto Z
404.1 Points ∼6% -17%
Huawei P9
435.2 Points ∼6% -11%
3D (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
46.18 fps ∼35%
Huawei Mate 8
30.14 fps ∼23% -35%
Google Pixel XL 2016
67.37 fps ∼51% +46%
Lenovo Moto Z
58.87 fps ∼45% +27%
Huawei P9
31.59 fps ∼24% -32%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
19.14 fps ∼49%
Huawei Mate 8
7.9 fps ∼20% -59%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
6.6 fps ∼17% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.31 fps ∼34% -30%
Lenovo Moto Z
24.33 fps ∼63% +27%
Huawei P9
7.9 fps ∼20% -59%

Legend

 
Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Google Pixel XL 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
152 Points ∼19%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
139 Points ∼17% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
96 Points ∼12% -37%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 Points ∼14% -26%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
204 Points ∼25% +34%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
126 Points ∼16% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
163 Points ∼20% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 Points ∼14% -26%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
128 Points ∼16% -16%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11897 Points ∼17%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11329 Points ∼16% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
7534 Points ∼11% -37%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8059 Points ∼12% -32%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
26053 Points ∼38% +119%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8690 Points ∼13% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
13191 Points ∼19% +11%
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7771 Points ∼11% -35%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11783 Points ∼17% -1%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2733.7 ms * ∼5%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3643 ms * ∼6% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5089.2 ms * ∼9% -86%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5552.9 ms * ∼9% -103%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
1102.7 ms * ∼2% +60%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2653.6 ms * ∼4% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2564.1 ms * ∼4% +6%
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3154.7 ms * ∼5% -15%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2922.6 ms * ∼5% -7%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
68.6 Points ∼17%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
65 Points ∼16% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
48.821 Points ∼12% -29%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46 Points ∼11% -33%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
168.08 Points ∼42% +145%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 Points ∼14% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
75.12 Points ∼19% +10%
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.5 Points ∼12% -31%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
68.4 Points ∼17% 0%
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1076 Points ∼50%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1127 Points ∼52% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
998 Points ∼46% -7%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
837 Points ∼39% -22%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
1542 Points ∼71% +43%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
977 Points ∼45% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
994 Points ∼46% -8%
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
959 Points ∼44% -11%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1029 Points ∼47% -4%
Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7565 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7008 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4666 Points ∼62% -38%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6271 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
7198 (6255min) Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5344 Points ∼71% -29%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6580 (6523min) Points ∼87% -13%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
-17%
25%
-10%
28%
145%
44%
Sequential Read 256KB
594.23
238.28
-60%
385.39
-35%
258.23
-57%
487.34
-18%
439.66
-26%
281.26
-53%
Sequential Write 256KB
142.92
124.78
-13%
150.05
5%
83.38
-42%
145.11
2%
168.32
18%
72.19
-49%
Random Read 4KB
94.69
24.98
-74%
90.32
-5%
87.67
-7%
86.71
-8%
117.15
24%
39
-59%
Random Write 4KB
8.77
15.74
79%
20.42
133%
14.56
66%
15.79
80%
74.93
754%
47.45
441%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
53.97
76.43
42%
78.51
45%
55.05
2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
29.53
50.36
71%
45.64
55%
24.83
-16%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 BeállításokÉrték
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 BeállításokÉrték
 high60 fps
Max. terhelés
 44.4 °C42.9 °C40.2 °C 
 43.5 °C43.1 °C41.7 °C 
 41 °C40.8 °C40.9 °C 
Maximum: 44.4 °C
Átlag: 42.1 °C
38 °C40.4 °C41.6 °C
38.4 °C39.5 °C40.6 °C
38.8 °C40 °C40.1 °C
Maximum: 41.6 °C
Átlag: 39.7 °C
Tápegység (max.)  36.4 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.72525.424.83125.324.94032.925.65033.635.16331.630.18028.423.31002724.812520.828.71602235.520021.343.325020.849.331521.253.740019.455.150019.56063017.763.380017.961.9100017.863.5125017.367.1160017.461.1200016.770250017.272.6315018.274.1400017.976.2500017.675.7630017.773.9800017.871.51000017.972.51250018.166.71600018.254.1SPL3083.9N1.353.7median 17.9median 63.3Delta1.310.731.630.925.43225.328.532.926.733.63531.626.628.4282733.820.837.62245.821.350.220.856.921.262.919.462.419.566.317.768.217.966.217.869.717.370.517.474.816.775.917.275.718.278.317.981.717.68017.776.617.877.517.974.418.163.318.248.83088.51.372.6median 17.9median 68.21.310.726.428.426.42826.72825.828.725.829.133.229.126.12626.123.925.523.927.724.727.733.426.933.441.53741.540.320.240.343.720.243.745.521.845.547224752.822.252.860.121.860.166.517.266.569.217.869.271.619.871.669.919.169.96815.46869.515.669.56614.96671.514.771.571.214.271.272.21472.271.213.971.26713.86758.913.958.952.413.952.454.713.754.781.529.581.549.91.349.9median 66median 17.2median 6610.93.810.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Mate 9Google Pixel XL 2016Apple iPhone 7 Plus
Huawei Mate 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Google Pixel XL 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.02 / 0.15 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.78 / 2.13 / 2.17 Watt
Terhelés midlight 6.32 / 6.49 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Huawei Mate 8
4000 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Google Pixel XL 2016
3450 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
LG G5
2800 mAh
Power Consumption
11%
-88%
20%
29%
25%
4%
Idle Minimum *
0.78
0.85
-9%
2.85
-265%
0.63
19%
0.53
32%
0.66
15%
0.55
29%
Idle Average *
2.13
2.07
3%
2.95
-38%
1.1
48%
1.07
50%
1.01
53%
1.37
36%
Idle Maximum *
2.17
2.28
-5%
3.26
-50%
1.56
28%
1.12
48%
1.09
50%
2.25
-4%
Load Average *
6.32
3.91
38%
8.92
-41%
5.95
6%
5.53
12%
3.97
37%
6.24
1%
Load Maximum *
6.49
4.69
28%
9.39
-45%
6.7
-3%
6.26
4%
8.34
-29%
9.12
-41%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
25h 38min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 47min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
3h 39min
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Huawei Mate 8
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Google Pixel XL 2016
3450 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
 mAh
Battery Runtime
14%
-4%
-34%
-22%
6%
Reader / Idle
1538
1872
22%
1835
19%
1078
-30%
1333
-13%
1775
15%
H.264
947
963
2%
813
-14%
611
-35%
505
-47%
WiFi v1.3
758
865
14%
587
-23%
369
-51%
505
-33%
431
-43%
Load
219
256
17%
225
3%
179
-18%
230
5%
322
47%

Pro

+ gyors SoC
+ kiváló, hibrid zoomos kamera great
+ gyors tárhely
+ kompakt és vonzó design
+ akár három év garancia
+ LTE Cat. 11
+ széles frekvencia-lefedettség
+ remek hangminőség, zajszűrés
+ App klónozás
+ IR sugárzó
+ dual-SIM ...

Kontra

- ...de csak hibrid foglalatként
- a microSD kártya nem formázható belső tárhelynek
- nincs App2SD
- kattogó hálózati adapter
- lassú SD-olvasó
- középszerű WiFi teljesítmény
In review: Huawei Mate 9. Test model courtesy of Huawei.
In review: Huawei Mate 9. Test model courtesy of Huawei.

A Huawei Mate 9 a gyártó előző csúcskategóriás phabletjének a közvetlen utódja. Újabb előrelépést jelent képességek és teljesítmény terén, és még mindig az egyik legnagyobb eszköz kategóriájában, még úgy is, hogy kicsit kisebb kijelzőt kapott. Mérete ellenére a kezelhetősége még mindig igen jó.

A technikai specifikációi kiválóak. A Kirin 960 nagyon gyors, legtöbbször lépést tud tartani a többi csúcs egylapkás eszközzel, a CPU pedig az egyik leggyorsabb modell. A multitasking megoldás szintén nagyon tetszett. Ezen kívül 4 GB RAM, és 64 GB (UFS 2.1) tárhely kapott benne helyet, amely ugyancsak kitűnő teljesítményre képes. Micro-SD kártyával még tovább bővíthető, bár a Huawei-nek érdemes lenne fejlesztenie a kártyaolvasón, mert csak átlagos átviteli sebességet produkál. A panel felbontása is lehetne nagyobb, főleg az 5.9 inches méretet figyelembe véve.

A Huawei Mate 9-ben fejlett technológia találkozik jó tartóssággal. Ha valaki szereti a nagy phableteket, nem nyúl mellé a Mate 9-cel.

A Mate 9-ben majdnem minden megvan a sokoldalú adatcseréhez. A gyors LTE Cat. 11 és a széles frekvencialefedettség lehetővé teszi, hogy szinte a világ bármely részén legyen vételünk. Az appok klónozásának köszönhetően akár két WhatsApp fiókot is tudunk használni két SIM-mel, egy eszközön. A WiFi hatótávolsága remek, de az átviteli sebesség lehetne jobb egy ilyen csúcsgépen.

A képet erős akkumulátor teszi teljessé, biztosítva a hosszú üzemidőt. Tehát, ha valaki nagy okostelefont keres, csúcskategóriás specifikációkkal, akkor számára nem igazán van más alternatíva, mint a Huawei Mate 9.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű értékelés itt olvasható.

Huawei Mate 9 - 11/08/2016 v5.1(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Váz
91%
Billentyűzet
73 / 75 → 97%
Érintőpad
97%
Csatlakoztathatóság
53 / 60 → 89%
Súly
89%
Akkumulátor
96%
Kijelző
87%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
60 / 63 → 95%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
65 / 70 → 93%
Hőmérséklet
86%
Zaj
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Camera
82%
Átlag
81%
89%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Andreas Osthoff
Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1262 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Huawei Mate 9 Phablet rövid értékelés
Daniel Schmidt, 2016-11-11 (Update: 2016-11-25)