Notebookcheck

Huawei Mate 8 okostelefon rövid teszt

Gyors és kitartó. A Huawei szeretne beszállni a felsőház versenyébe egy vadonat új, 6 hüvelykes kijelzővel ellátott rendszerrel. Górcső alá vesszük a Mate 8-at, hogy sikerült-e a vállalkozás.
Andreas Osthoff, Tanja Hinum (fordította Nagy-Egri Máté Ferenc), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
, , , , , ,
hasonló találatok
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Huawei Mate 8 (Mate Széria)
Processzor
HiSilicon Kirin 950 8 x 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53
Grafikus adapter
Memória
3072 MB 
Kijelző
6.00 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, kapacitív, IPS-NEO, fényes: igen
Háttértár
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 24.7 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm jack, Kártyaolvasó: microSD 128 GB-ig, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: Környezetifény-érzékelő, ujjlenyomat, gyorsulásérő, iránytű, HALL szenzor, giroszkóp, közelségérzékelő szenzor, barométer, USB-OTG, WiFi-Direct
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (FDD: B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B6/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26, TDD: B38/B39/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.9 x 157.1 x 80.6
Akkumulátor
4000 mAh Lítium-Ion, Beszédidő 2G (gyártói adat): 42 h, Beszédidő 3G (gyártói adat): 28 h, Készenlét 2G (gyártói adat): 636 h, Készenlét 3G (gyártói adat): 614 h
Operációs rendszer
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, OIS, autófókusz, Két-tónusú vaku, 1080p video (60 fps)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.4
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: Mono, Billentyűzet: virtuális, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, Hálózati adapteter, USB kábel, fülhallgató, Üzembe helyezési útmutató, biztonsági leírás, EMUI 4.0, telefon kezelő, HiCare, FM radio, Google appok, 24 Hónap Garancia
Súly
185 g, Tápegység: 70 g
Ár
599 Euró
Hivatkozások
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

159.3 mm 77.8 mm 7.5 mm 178 g158.2 mm 77.9 mm 7.3 mm 192 g157.1 mm 80.6 mm 7.9 mm 185 g153.9 mm 76.2 mm 10.6 mm 177 g152.5 mm 77.2 mm 10.9 mm 170 g154.4 mm 75.8 mm 6.9 mm 153 g151.9 mm 78.4 mm 8.3 mm 165 g
Huawei Mate 8: complete
Huawei Mate 8: complete
Huawei Mate 8: crossing
Huawei Mate 8: crossing
Huawei Mate 8: shore
Huawei Mate 8: shore
Garmin Edge 500: complete
Garmin Edge 500: complete
Garmin Edge 500: crossing
Garmin Edge 500: crossing
Garmin Edge 500: shore
Garmin Edge 500: shore

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
509
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
527
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 527 cd/m² Átlag: 513.1 cd/m² Minimum: 8.43 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 94 %
Centrumban: 514 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1469:1 (Fekete: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.08 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 5.49 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
99.84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
79.95% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
90.84% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.87% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
8%
15%
0%
6%
-27%
-6%
Brightness middle
514
335.7
-35%
363
-29%
583
13%
297
-42%
425
-17%
538
5%
Brightness
513
332
-35%
365
-29%
560
9%
297
-42%
395
-23%
528
3%
Brightness Distribution
94
89
-5%
90
-4%
91
-3%
93
-1%
88
-6%
92
-2%
Black Level *
0.35
0.46
-31%
0.5
-43%
0.66
-89%
Contrast
1469
1267
-14%
850
-42%
815
-45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.08
2.33
54%
2.34
54%
3.55
30%
2.67
47%
7.05
-39%
2.63
48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.28
3.98
52%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.49
2.15
61%
1.03
81%
3.88
29%
2.81
49%
6.38
-16%
3.24
41%
Gamma
2.08 106%
2.15 102%
2.23 99%
2.2 100%
2.08 106%
1.63 135%
2.17 101%
CCT
7254 90%
6184 105%
6429 101%
7280 89%
6379 102%
6776 96%
6906 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
79.95
59.05
-26%
66.31
-17%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.84
92.8
-7%
99.79
0%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 28.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9689 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
2898 Points ∼4%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
915 Points ∼19%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
6265 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
4207 Points ∼7% -33%
Google Nexus 6P
4587 Points ∼7% -27%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4429 Points ∼7% -29%
Motorola Moto X Style
3567 Points ∼6% -43%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
1721 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1317 Points ∼27% -23%
Google Nexus 6P
1335 Points ∼27% -22%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2538 Points ∼52% +47%
Motorola Moto X Style
1276 Points ∼26% -26%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
5220 Points ∼34%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
7344 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
5130 Points ∼26% -30%
Google Nexus 6P
4716 Points ∼24% -36%
Motorola Moto X Style
5859 Points ∼29% -20%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
2552 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1627 Points ∼28% -36%
Google Nexus 6P
1317 Points ∼22% -48%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1676 Points ∼28% -34%
Motorola Moto X Style
1345 Points ∼23% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
801 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1176 Points ∼10% +47%
Google Nexus 6P
1589 Points ∼14% +98%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2601 Points ∼22% +225%
Motorola Moto X Style
440 Points ∼4% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
945 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1253 Points ∼6% +33%
Google Nexus 6P
1519 Points ∼7% +61%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2318 Points ∼11% +145%
Motorola Moto X Style
517 Points ∼3% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
2432 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1652 Points ∼30% -32%
Google Nexus 6P
1142 Points ∼21% -53%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1697 Points ∼31% -30%
Motorola Moto X Style
1339 Points ∼25% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
1092 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1606 Points ∼10% +47%
Google Nexus 6P
2302 Points ∼14% +111%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4557 Points ∼27% +317%
Motorola Moto X Style
1419 Points ∼9% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
1244 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1616 Points ∼14% +30%
Google Nexus 6P
1877 Points ∼17% +51%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3316 Points ∼29% +167%
Motorola Moto X Style
1400 Points ∼12% +13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
15575 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
16117 Points ∼17% +3%
Google Nexus 6P
14983 Points ∼15% -4%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
12854 Points ∼13% -17%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
21115 Points ∼22% +36%
Motorola Moto X Style
12767 Points ∼13% -18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
20537 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
27549 Points ∼4% +34%
Google Nexus 6P
34758 Points ∼5% +69%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
41615 Points ∼6% +103%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
20006 Points ∼3% -3%
Motorola Moto X Style
23321 Points ∼4% +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
19179 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
23798 Points ∼8% +24%
Google Nexus 6P
26876 Points ∼9% +40%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
27795 Points ∼10% +45%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
20242 Points ∼7% +6%
Motorola Moto X Style
19702 Points ∼7% +3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
41 fps ∼0%
Google Nexus 6P
44 fps ∼0% +7%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
78.9 fps ∼1% +92%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
27.11 fps ∼0% -34%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
30 fps ∼0% -27%
Motorola Moto X Style
34 fps ∼0% -17%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
44 fps ∼1%
Google Nexus 6P
33 fps ∼1% -25%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
59 fps ∼2% +34%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
18.75 fps ∼1% -57%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
30 fps ∼1% -32%
Motorola Moto X Style
24 fps ∼1% -45%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
18 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
18 fps ∼2% 0%
Google Nexus 6P
25 fps ∼3% +39%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps ∼4% +113%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
17.54 fps ∼2% -3%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
13 fps ∼1% -28%
Motorola Moto X Style
15 fps ∼2% -17%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
19 fps ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
14 fps ∼4% -26%
Google Nexus 6P
17 fps ∼5% -11%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps ∼11% +102%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
11.81 fps ∼3% -38%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
12 fps ∼3% -37%
Motorola Moto X Style
9.3 fps ∼3% -51%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
10 fps ∼0%
Google Nexus 6P
16 fps ∼0% +60%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
28 fps ∼1% +180%
Motorola Moto X Style
9.9 fps ∼0% -1%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
11 fps ∼0%
Google Nexus 6P
9.5 fps ∼0% -14%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
28 fps ∼1% +155%
Motorola Moto X Style
5.6 fps ∼0% -49%
Smartbench 2012
Gaming Index (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
4599 points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
4566 points ∼99% -1%
Google Nexus 6P
4332 points ∼94% -6%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
4378 points ∼95% -5%
Motorola Moto X Style
3873 points ∼84% -16%
Productivity Index (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
18831 points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
16793 points ∼89% -11%
Google Nexus 6P
10823 points ∼57% -43%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
3856 points ∼20% -80%
Motorola Moto X Style
8815 points ∼47% -53%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
1127 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
993 Points ∼46% -12%
Google Nexus 6P
791 Points ∼36% -30%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1199 Points ∼55% +6%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
837 Points ∼39% -26%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
896 Points ∼41% -20%
Motorola Moto X Style
974 Points ∼45% -14%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
1636 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
2457 Points ∼9% +50%
Google Nexus 6P
2424 Points ∼8% +48%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4299 Points ∼15% +163%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2040 Points ∼7% +25%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
1411 Points ∼5% -14%
Motorola Moto X Style
1918 Points ∼7% +17%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
2339 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1298 Points ∼14% -45%
Google Nexus 6P
1136 Points ∼13% -51%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1124 Points ∼12% -52%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1945 Points ∼22% -17%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
1035 Points ∼11% -56%
Motorola Moto X Style
1776 Points ∼20% -24%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
4064 Points ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
3321 Points ∼20% -18%
Google Nexus 6P
1798 Points ∼11% -56%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3925 Points ∼24% -3%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1386 Points ∼8% -66%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
1968 Points ∼12% -52%
Motorola Moto X Style
2783 Points ∼17% -32%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
2046 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1801 Points ∼21% -12%
Google Nexus 6P
1405 Points ∼17% -31%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2206 Points ∼26% +8%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1465 Points ∼17% -28%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
1267 Points ∼15% -38%
Motorola Moto X Style
1743 Points ∼21% -15%
Linpack Android / IOS
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
523.8 MFLOPS ∼18%
Google Nexus 6P
262.042 MFLOPS ∼9% -50%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1295 MFLOPS ∼44% +147%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2956.69 MFLOPS ∼100% +464%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
415.435 MFLOPS ∼14% -21%
Motorola Moto X Style
589.744 MFLOPS ∼20% +13%
Single Thread (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
328.8 MFLOPS ∼32%
Google Nexus 6P
87.088 MFLOPS ∼9% -74%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
669 MFLOPS ∼66% +103%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
369.586 MFLOPS ∼36% +12%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
171.438 MFLOPS ∼17% -48%
Motorola Moto X Style
415.017 MFLOPS ∼41% +26%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
347 Points ∼5%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
858 Points ∼13% +147%
Motorola Moto X Style
291 Points ∼5% -16%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
16688 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
9252 Points ∼21% -45%
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
29659 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
31743 Points ∼71% +7%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
33082 Points ∼74% +12%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
7.9 fps ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
11.18 fps ∼29% +42%
Epic Citadel
Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
59 fps ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
42.7 fps ∼69% -28%
High Quality (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
57.8 fps ∼95%
High Performance (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
60.1 fps ∼99%

Legend

 
Huawei Mate 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
 
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML Intel Atom Z3580, PowerVR G6430, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto X Style Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Sunspider
1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
460.6 ms * ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
688.5 ms * ∼8% -49%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
529.7 ms * ∼6% -15%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
223 ms * ∼2% +52%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
409.7 ms * ∼4% +11%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
930.6 ms * ∼10% -102%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
773.6 ms * ∼8% -68%
0.9.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
700.6 ms * ∼7%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
139 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
95 Points ∼12% -32%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
116 Points ∼14% -17%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
190 Points ∼24% +37%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 Points ∼14% -19%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
110 Points ∼14% -21%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
65 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
48.136 Points ∼12% -26%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 Points ∼12% -27%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
118.7 Points ∼29% +83%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46 Points ∼11% -29%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
36.274 Points ∼9% -44%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45 Points ∼11% -31%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3643 ms * ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5066.7 ms * ∼9% -39%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4193 ms * ∼7% -15%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1743 ms * ∼3% +52%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5552.9 ms * ∼9% -52%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6002.2 ms * ∼10% -65%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7325 ms * ∼12% -101%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11329 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
7724 Points ∼11% -32%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8804 Points ∼13% -22%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
15967 Points ∼23% +41%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8059 Points ∼12% -29%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6379 Points ∼9% -44%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8065 Points ∼12% -29%
Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11458 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8801 Points ∼45% -23%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8622 Points ∼44% -25%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
15529 Points ∼79% +36%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7362 Points ∼38% -36%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7829 Points ∼40% -32%
Browsermark - 2.1 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2478 points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1884 points ∼6% -24%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
0 points ∼0% -100%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
988 points ∼3% -60%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15.74 MB/s ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
20.95 MB/s ∼6% +33%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11.79 MB/s ∼4% -25%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.48 MB/s ∼3% -46%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
31.1 MB/s ∼9% +98%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.98 MB/s ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
89.91 MB/s ∼24% +260%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20.1 MB/s ∼5% -20%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
20.68 MB/s ∼6% -17%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26.97 MB/s ∼7% +8%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
124.78 MB/s ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
151.11 MB/s ∼11% +21%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
122.51 MB/s ∼9% -2%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
89.99 MB/s ∼7% -28%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46.15 MB/s ∼3% -63%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
238.28 MB/s ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
382.97 MB/s ∼19% +61%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
236.33 MB/s ∼12% -1%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
144.47 MB/s ∼7% -39%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
246.89 MB/s ∼12% +4%
Max. terhelés
 42 °C40 °C38.8 °C 
 41.9 °C39 °C38.7 °C 
 39.8 °C38.5 °C36.1 °C 
Maximum: 42 °C
Átlag: 39.4 °C
34.9 °C36.3 °C37.5 °C
34.9 °C37 °C37.5 °C
34.7 °C36.1 °C35.9 °C
Maximum: 37.5 °C
Átlag: 36.1 °C
Tápegység (max.)  30.2 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.07 / 0.3 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.85 / 2.07 / 2.28 Watt
Terhelés midlight 3.91 / 4.69 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption
-19%
7%
-110%
-20%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
0.85
0.83
2%
0.5
41%
2.85
-235%
1.1
-29%
0.7
18%
Idle Average *
2.07
1.09
47%
1.9
8%
2.95
-43%
2.2
-6%
2.2
-6%
Idle Maximum *
2.28
1.17
49%
2.2
4%
3.26
-43%
2.4
-5%
2.3
-1%
Load Average *
3.91
7.49
-92%
3.2
18%
8.92
-128%
4.2
-7%
3.9
-0%
Load Maximum *
4.69
9.51
-103%
6.4
-36%
9.39
-100%
7.2
-54%
6.8
-45%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
31h 12min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 03min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
4h 16min
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML
PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
-26%
-29%
-26%
-42%
-51%
-42%
Reader / Idle
1872
1459
-22%
1447
-23%
1655
-12%
1078
-42%
1141
-39%
H.264
963
533
-45%
714
-26%
611
-37%
383
-60%
WiFi v1.3
865
501
-42%
375
-57%
513
-41%
369
-57%
420
-51%
400
-54%
Load
256
223
-13%
280
9%
197
-23%
179
-30%
219
-14%

Pro

+ remek ház
+ fényes kijelző
+ kiváló teljesítmény
+ nagyon jó akkumulátoros üzemidő
+ dual-SIM
+ microSD memória bővítés
+ ujjlenyomat olvasó
+ nincs előtelepített "szemét"

Kontra

- a kijelző rossz szín hűsége
- rossz előlapi kamera
- magas ár
- közepes GPS
- mérsékelt visszafojtás hosszú terheléskor
- hangszóró
In review: Huawei Mate 8. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei Mate 8. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.

A Huawei Mate 8 nagyon jó benyomást tett ránk a nálunk töltött ideje alatt, leginkább a teljesítményével és a remek házával. Meglehetősen nagy készülék a maga 6 hüvelykes kijelzőjével, de még mindig kezelhető, hála a kijelző vékony keretének. A teljesítménye mellett az új Kirin 950 SoC a hatékonyságával is meggyőzött minket, mivel igen masszív üzemidőket produkált a 4000 mAh-ás akkumulátorához képest. Jellemzően két napot képes kihúzni egy töltéssel. Az Android 6.0 kezelése a gyártó saját EMUI 4.0 kezelőfelületével mindig gördülékeny, továbbá a gyártó nélkülözi a fölösleges előtelepített alkalmazásokat is.

Képes tehát a Mate 8 versenyre kélni a többi felsőház-beli készülékkel? Nem maradéktalanul, mivel vannak még csiszolni való pontok. A FullHD kijelző meglehetősen magas szín eltéréseket mutat, nem lehet 4K-s felvételeket készíteni, a GPS modul lehetne pontosabb és a dual-SIM támogatás is lehetne jobb, tekintve hogy csak a két foglalat közül csak az egyik támogatja a mobil adatkapcsolatot. Ezen hiányosságok egy részét bizonyára orvosolni fogja majd az érkező Huawei zászlóshajó, a Huawei P9, ami vélhetőleg áprilisban teszi tiszteletét. Azonban semmi sem szól ellene, amennyiben egy kellemes küllemű, nagy kijelzős készüléket keresnénk hosszú akkumulátoros üzemidővel.

A borítás, a teljesítmény és a kitartása az új Huawei Mate 8-nak kiváló, de egyes riválisok még több képességgel szolgálnak.

Ez egy kivonatolt változata az eredeti tesztnek. A hosszabb, angol nyelvű változat itt tekinthető meg.

Huawei Mate 8 - 04/13/2016 v5(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Váz
91%
Billentyűzet
75 / 75 → 100%
Érintőpad
92%
Csatlakoztathatóság
57 / 60 → 95%
Súly
89%
Akkumulátor
96%
Kijelző
87%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
47 / 63 → 74%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
60 / 70 → 86%
Hőmérséklet
89%
Zaj
100%
Audio
63 / 91 → 69%
Camera
79%
Átlag
79%
87%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Andreas Osthoff
Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1262 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Huawei Mate 8 okostelefon rövid teszt
Andreas Osthoff, 2016-03- 5 (Update: 2016-03-13)