Notebookcheck

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G smartphone rövid értékelés: 5G a kis költségvetésnek

Megegyezünk? A Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T legkisebb verziója 230 euróba kerül, és néhány helyen már most kevesebb mint 200 euróért hozzá lehet jutni. Különleges jellemző: A Redmi Note 9T az egyik legolcsóbb, ha nem a legolcsóbb 5G okostelefon. Az alacsony ár ellenére a többi jellemző is jónak tűnik. Ez pedig elég indok arra, hogy közelebbről is megnézzük a Xiaomi 5G okostelefonját.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (fordította Zoltán Kiss), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen
, , , , , ,
hasonló találatok
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Redmi Note Széria)
Processzor
MediaTek Dimensity 800U 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP3
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Kijelző
6.53 hüvelyk 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive, IPS, FHD , Gorilla Glass 5, fényes: igen, 60 Hz
Háttértár
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108.2 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audió csatlakozók: 3,5 mm-es audió jack, Kártyaolvasó: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: közelségérzékelő, gyorsulásmérő, giroszkóp, elektronikus iránytű, lineáris motor, IR blaster, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (Sávok 2/3/5/8), 3G (Sávok 1/2/4/5/8), 4G (Sávok 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/32/18/26/12/17/19/38/40/41/42), 5G (Sávok n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n41/n77/n78/n79), fej SAR 0.592 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 9.05 x 161.9 x 77.3
Akkumulátor
5000 mAh Lítium-Polimer, 18 wattos töltés
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operációs rendszer
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48 MP fő kamera (1/2" szensor méret, f/1.9, AF, 4 az 1-ben szuperpixel) 2 MP mélységérzékelő (f/2.4) 2 MP makró kamera (f/2.4, FF), videofelvétel [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix 13 MP szelfi kamera (f/2.25), videofelvétel [email protected]
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: kettős hangszórók, Billentyűzet: virtual, 22.5 wattos hálózati adapter, USB kábel (A/C), SIM-kiadó eszköz, védőtok, használati útmutató, jótállási jegy, MIUI 12, 24 Hónap Garancia, fanless
Súly
199 g, Tápegység: 62 g
Ár
269.90 Euró
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80 %
07/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3
199 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.53"2340x1080
80 %
08/2020
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
SD 765, Adreno 620
207 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080
80 %
01/2021
Oppo A73 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
80 %
12/2020
realme 7 5G
Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3
195 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
80 %
01/2021
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
193 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"1600x720
82 %
09/2020
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
SD 732G, Adreno 618
215 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080

Size comparison

168 mm 74 mm 9 mm 207 g165.3 mm 76.8 mm 9.4 mm 215 g164.4 mm 75.9 mm 8.6 mm 193 g162.2 mm 75.1 mm 9.1 mm 195 g161.9 mm 77.3 mm 9.05 mm 199 g162 mm 75 mm 7.9 mm 177 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
646 (590min - 656max) MBit/s ∼100% +92%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
633 (589min - 676max) MBit/s ∼98% +88%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=303, last 2 years)
415 MBit/s ∼64% +24%
realme 7 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
346 (334min - 352max) MBit/s ∼54% +3%
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (323min - 361max) MBit/s ∼53% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
336 (271min - 355max) MBit/s ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
328 (323min - 332max) MBit/s ∼51% -2%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
666 (646min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100% +82%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
636 (500min - 675max) MBit/s ∼95% +74%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=303, last 2 years)
419 MBit/s ∼63% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
366 (336min - 379max) MBit/s ∼55%
realme 7 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
355 (300min - 365max) MBit/s ∼53% -3%
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
340 (313min - 353max) MBit/s ∼51% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
329 (307min - 340max) MBit/s ∼49% -10%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360362379370360366375358367362359353372336367359363376350360356344348375360374350374345357364362379370360366375358367362359353372336367359363376350360356344348375360374350374345357364334350338340336319344335345328351339324324327338352350347353340319349331271303348339355338Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø361 (336-379)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø336 (271-355)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T: Overview
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T: Overview
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T: Lake
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T: Lake
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T: Turning point
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Lake
Garmin Edge 500: Lake
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Main camera sample
Main camera sample
Selfie camera sample
Selfie camera sample

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight-Scene 1Daylight-Scene 25x zoomLow light
click to load images
ColorChecker
14.3 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
12 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G: 7.96 ∆E min: 1.63 - max: 18.76 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
65.7 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G: 47.2 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 92.94 ∆E
539
cd/m²
544
cd/m²
520
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
572
cd/m²
547
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 572 cd/m² Átlag: 540.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.49 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 90 %
Centrumban: 572 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1362:1 (Fekete: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
93.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70
Oppo A73 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
realme 7 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.60
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
13%
3%
-15%
14%
8%
Brightness middle
572
461
-19%
527
-8%
490
-14%
466
-19%
623
9%
Brightness
540
458
-15%
499
-8%
455
-16%
462
-14%
600
11%
Brightness Distribution
90
93
3%
87
-3%
84
-7%
85
-6%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.42
0.52
-24%
0.38
10%
0.69
-64%
0.54
-29%
Contrast
1362
887
-35%
1387
2%
710
-48%
1154
-15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.1
1.01
75%
3.5
15%
4.01
2%
2.06
50%
1.8
56%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.2
2.1
81%
7.3
35%
8.1
28%
6.14
45%
4.7
58%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
1.5
40%
2.9
-16%
2.6
-4%
1.8
28%
3.3
-32%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.25 98%
2.29 96%
2.23 99%
2.105 105%
2.26 97%
CCT
6525 100%
6701 97%
6502 100%
6828 95%
6444 101%
6712 97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 14825 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.1 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
600 Points ∼91%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
596 Points ∼91% -1%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
516 Points ∼78% -14%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
598 Points ∼91% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
658 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
567 Points ∼86% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (596 - 606, n=4)
600 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=234, last 2 years)
566 Points ∼86% -6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1781 Points ∼90%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1954 Points ∼99% +10%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1638 Points ∼83% -8%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
1778 Points ∼90% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1979 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1787 Points ∼90% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (1776 - 1805, n=4)
1785 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=234, last 2 years)
1940 Points ∼98% +9%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1459 Points ∼71%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1022 Points ∼50% -30%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
1575 Points ∼77% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1120 Points ∼55% -23%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1090 Points ∼53% -25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (1459 - 2136, n=4)
1814 Points ∼88% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=124, last 2 years)
2053 Points ∼100% +41%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1935 Points ∼90%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1095 Points ∼51% -43%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1537 Points ∼72% -21%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
2089 Points ∼98% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1252 Points ∼58% -35%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1291 Points ∼60% -33%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (1935 - 2146, n=4)
2062 Points ∼96% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=128, last 2 years)
2141 Points ∼100% +11%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
10527 Points ∼66%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
9914 Points ∼62% -6%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
10673 Points ∼67% +1%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
16039 Points ∼100% +52%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8773 Points ∼55% -17%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (10527 - 16039, n=2)
13283 Points ∼83% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=223, last 2 years)
9982 Points ∼62% -5%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
8738 Points ∼79%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
8756 Points ∼79% 0%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
7395 Points ∼67% -15%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
11047 Points ∼100% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
8063 Points ∼73% -8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8101 Points ∼73% -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (8738 - 11047, n=2)
9893 Points ∼90% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=267, last 2 years)
7878 Points ∼71% -10%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
42735 Points ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
23548 Points ∼55%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
30852 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
39850 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
40955 Points ∼96%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
 
30852 Points ∼72%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=207, last 2 years)
40247 Points ∼94%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
62756 Points ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
29682 Points ∼47%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
34605 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
56286 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
56640 Points ∼90%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
 
34605 Points ∼55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=207, last 2 years)
58049 Points ∼92%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
20156 Points ∼86%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13664 Points ∼59%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
22364 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
19708 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
20797 Points ∼89%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
 
22364 Points ∼96%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=207, last 2 years)
23323 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4401 Points ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3521 Points ∼80%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4299 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4044 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3784 Points ∼86%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (4204 - 4372, n=3)
4292 Points ∼98%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=260, last 2 years)
3369 Points ∼77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4654 Points ∼98%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3694 Points ∼77%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4609 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4189 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3917 Points ∼82%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (4609 - 4889, n=3)
4772 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=260, last 2 years)
3943 Points ∼83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3498 Points ∼97%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3024 Points ∼84%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3479 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3607 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3382 Points ∼94%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (2908 - 3479, n=3)
3193 Points ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=260, last 2 years)
2756 Points ∼76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4484 Points ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3377 Points ∼75%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4206 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4120 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3918 Points ∼87%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (4206 - 4467, n=3)
4350 Points ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=276, last 2 years)
3948 Points ∼88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4865 Points ∼98%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3497 Points ∼70%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4457 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4298 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4086 Points ∼82%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (4457 - 5012, n=3)
4811 Points ∼96%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=276, last 2 years)
4986 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3512 Points ∼98%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3014 Points ∼84%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3512 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3597 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼95%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3095 - 3512, n=3)
3281 Points ∼91%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=274, last 2 years)
2908 Points ∼81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3015 Points ∼94%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2529 Points ∼79%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3146 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2828 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2713 Points ∼84%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3142 - 3365, n=3)
3218 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=258, last 2 years)
2629 Points ∼82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2963 Points ∼93%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2418 Points ∼76%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3063 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2667 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2559 Points ∼80%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3063 - 3317, n=3)
3202 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=258, last 2 years)
2786 Points ∼87%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3445 Points ∼96%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3011 Points ∼84%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3473 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3588 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3436 Points ∼96%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (2881 - 3545, n=3)
3300 Points ∼92%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=258, last 2 years)
2802 Points ∼78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3236 Points ∼99%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2653 Points ∼81%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3262 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2990 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2865 Points ∼87%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3262 - 3291, n=3)
3278 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=274, last 2 years)
3193 Points ∼97%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3165 Points ∼89%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2561 Points ∼72%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3201 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2845 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2735 Points ∼77%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3201 - 3304, n=3)
3268 Points ∼92%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=274, last 2 years)
3570 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3457 Points ∼95%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3037 Points ∼84%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3497 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3636 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3438 Points ∼95%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3205 - 3497, n=3)
3320 Points ∼91%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=274, last 2 years)
2959 Points ∼81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2814 Points ∼93%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2410 Points ∼80%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3027 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2611 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2506 Points ∼83%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (2955 - 3099, n=3)
3027 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=215, last 2 years)
2636 Points ∼87%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2844 Points ∼92%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2354 Points ∼76%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3029 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2548 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2427 Points ∼78%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3029 - 3163, n=3)
3096 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=215, last 2 years)
2959 Points ∼96%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2802 Points ∼93%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2631 Points ∼87%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3022 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2858 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2827 Points ∼94%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (2550 - 3022, n=3)
2822 Points ∼93%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=215, last 2 years)
2651 Points ∼88%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1233 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
835 Points ∼30%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (1602 - 1607, n=2)
1605 Points ∼58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=90, last 2 years)
2754 Points ∼100%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1207 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
720 Points ∼24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (1579 - 1586, n=2)
1583 Points ∼53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=87, last 2 years)
2964 Points ∼100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
58 fps ∼77%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +29%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
55 fps ∼73% -5%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
59 fps ∼79% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
60 fps ∼80% +3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼80% +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (58 - 59, n=3)
58.7 fps ∼78% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=215, last 2 years)
57 fps ∼76% -2%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
79 fps ∼75%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
86 fps ∼81% +9%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
67 fps ∼63% -15%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
83 fps ∼78% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
91 fps ∼86% +15%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
91 fps ∼86% +15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (79 - 83, n=3)
81.3 fps ∼77% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=215, last 2 years)
106 fps ∼100% +34%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
47 fps ∼80%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
44 fps ∼75% -6%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
37 fps ∼63% -21%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
48 fps ∼81% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
59 fps ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼58% -28%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (44 - 48, n=3)
46.3 fps ∼78% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=213, last 2 years)
45 fps ∼76% -4%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
44 fps ∼71%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
50 fps ∼81% +14%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
37 fps ∼60% -16%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
51 fps ∼82% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
46 fps ∼74% +5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
45 fps ∼73% +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (44 - 51, n=3)
48.7 fps ∼79% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=214, last 2 years)
62 fps ∼100% +41%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
31 fps ∼55%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
29 fps ∼52% -6%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
24 fps ∼43% -23%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
31 fps ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
56 fps ∼100% +81%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28 fps ∼50% -10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (31 - 31, n=3)
31 fps ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=212, last 2 years)
35.4 fps ∼63% +14%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
33 fps ∼78%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
33 fps ∼78% 0%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
27 fps ∼64% -18%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
35 fps ∼82% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
33 fps ∼78% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
33 fps ∼78% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (33 - 35, n=3)
34 fps ∼80% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=212, last 2 years)
42.5 fps ∼100% +29%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
16 fps ∼48%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
16 fps ∼48% 0%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13 fps ∼39% -19%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
18 fps ∼55% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +106%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼52% +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (16 - 18, n=3)
17 fps ∼52% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=211, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼67% +39%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼67%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
19 fps ∼75% +12%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps ∼59% -12%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
20 fps ∼78% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
19 fps ∼75% +12%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
19 fps ∼75% +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (17 - 20, n=3)
19 fps ∼75% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=211, last 2 years)
25.5 fps ∼100% +50%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
19 fps ∼58%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
18 fps ∼55% -5%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps ∼45% -21%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
20 fps ∼61% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +74%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼55% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (19 - 20, n=4)
19.3 fps ∼58% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=280, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼67% +17%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼82%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
21 fps ∼82% 0%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
17 fps ∼66% -19%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
22 fps ∼86% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
20 fps ∼78% -5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
20 fps ∼78% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (21 - 22, n=4)
21.3 fps ∼83% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=279, last 2 years)
25.6 fps ∼100% +22%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
12 fps ∼57%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
11 fps ∼52% -8%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
9.2 fps ∼44% -23%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
12 fps ∼57% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
21 fps ∼100% +75%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼52% -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (12 - 12, n=4)
12 fps ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=280, last 2 years)
14.8 fps ∼70% +23%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
7.3 fps ∼72%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
7.5 fps ∼74% +3%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
6.1 fps ∼60% -16%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
8 fps ∼79% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7.4 fps ∼73% +1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7.5 fps ∼74% +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (7.3 - 8.1, n=4)
7.85 fps ∼78% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=279, last 2 years)
10.1 fps ∼100% +38%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
279244 Points ∼84%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
253013 Points ∼76%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
331094 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
299167 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
279048 Points ∼84%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
 
331094 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=186, last 2 years)
331491 Points ∼100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3379 Points ∼88%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3845 Points ∼100% +14%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3019 Points ∼79% -11%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3350 Points ∼87% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3708 Points ∼96% +10%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3477 Points ∼90% +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3350 - 3442, n=3)
3390 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=198, last 2 years)
3625 Points ∼94% +7%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6380 Points ∼90%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
6745 Points ∼96% +6%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
5692 Points ∼81% -11%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
6052 Points ∼86% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7052 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
6542 Points ∼93% +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (6052 - 6975, n=3)
6469 Points ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=198, last 2 years)
6635 Points ∼94% +4%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
4838 Points ∼99%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4775 Points ∼98% -1%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4185 Points ∼86% -13%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4877 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4543 Points ∼93% -6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4041 Points ∼83% -16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (4528 - 4877, n=3)
4748 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=198, last 2 years)
4241 Points ∼87% -12%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3205 Points ∼57%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4697 Points ∼84% +47%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2687 Points ∼48% -16%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3161 Points ∼56% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4017 Points ∼72% +25%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3960 Points ∼71% +24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (3161 - 3400, n=3)
3255 Points ∼58% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=198, last 2 years)
5613 Points ∼100% +75%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1318 Points ∼90%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1456 Points ∼99% +10%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1297 Points ∼88% -2%
realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
1349 Points ∼92% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1468 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1395 Points ∼95% +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  (1307 - 1349, n=3)
1325 Points ∼90% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=198, last 2 years)
1272 Points ∼87% -3%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chrome 87)
54.661 Points ∼100% +38%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
52.591 Points ∼96% +33%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=184, last 2 years)
50 Points ∼91% +26%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
48.568 Points ∼89% +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)
39.536 Points ∼72%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
34.002 Points ∼62% -14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (28.1 - 39.5, n=2)
33.8 Points ∼62% -15%
realme 7 5G (Chrome 68)
28.086 Points ∼51% -29%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chrome 87)
94.517 Points ∼100% +20%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
90.555 Points ∼96% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=192, last 2 years)
89.7 Points ∼95% +14%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
88.457 Points ∼94% +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)
78.952 Points ∼84%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (51.4 - 83.5, n=3)
71.3 Points ∼75% -10%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
70.069 Points ∼74% -11%
realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
51.389 Points ∼54% -35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=165, last 2 years)
50.7 runs/min ∼100% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chome 87)
47.6 runs/min ∼94% +26%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
45.2 runs/min ∼89% +20%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
43.9 runs/min ∼87% +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)
37.8 runs/min ∼75%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
37.7 runs/min ∼74% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (26.3 - 37.8, n=2)
32.1 runs/min ∼63% -15%
realme 7 5G (Chome 86)
26.3 runs/min ∼52% -30%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
78 Points ∼100% +66%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=202, last 2 years)
78 Points ∼100% +66%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chrome 87)
75 Points ∼96% +60%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
72 Points ∼92% +53%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (45 - 58, n=3)
50 Points ∼64% +6%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
49 Points ∼63% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)
47 Points ∼60%
realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
45 Points ∼58% -4%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chrome 87)
17899 Points ∼100% +8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
17398 Points ∼97% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=209, last 2 years)
17325 Points ∼97% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)
16629 Points ∼93%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
16302 Points ∼91% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (9999 - 18123, n=3)
14917 Points ∼83% -10%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
14886 Points ∼83% -10%
realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
9999 Points ∼56% -40%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
4695.3 ms * ∼100% -42%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
4059.1 ms * ∼86% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=211, last 2 years)
3999 ms * ∼85% -21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U (3013 - 4695, n=3)
3669 ms * ∼78% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G (Chrome 88.0.4324.93)
3298.1 ms * ∼70%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
2764.2 ms * ∼59% +16%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
2672.8 ms * ∼57% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G (Chrome 87)
2665 ms * ∼57% +19%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5GMotorola Moto G 5G PlusOppo A73 5Grealme 7 5GSamsung Galaxy A42 5GXiaomi Poco X3 NFCAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-20%
-40%
-27%
-2%
-34%
-14%
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB
912.54
885.34
-3%
859.98
-6%
877.1
-4%
963
6%
505.96
-45%
704 (482 - 989, n=11)
-23%
752 (41.9 - 2037, n=285, last 2 years)
-18%
Sequential Write 256KB
483.45
180.21
-63%
193.04
-60%
188.4
-61%
476
-2%
173.09
-64%
384 (241 - 710, n=11)
-21%
327 (11.9 - 1321, n=285, last 2 years)
-32%
Random Read 4KB
171.12
138.14
-19%
102.16
-40%
92.6
-46%
168.5
-2%
123.43
-28%
151 (105 - 208, n=11)
-12%
134 (13.5 - 325, n=285, last 2 years)
-22%
Random Write 4KB
197.02
119.3
-39%
88.11
-55%
95.1
-52%
147.7
-25%
112.55
-43%
158 (121 - 207, n=11)
-20%
120 (4.97 - 330, n=285, last 2 years)
-39%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
87.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
84.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
86.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
75.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-10%
82.3 (77.2 - 85.9, n=3)
-2%
75.9 (13.4 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)
-9%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
63.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
67.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
55.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-13%
59.1 (49.6 - 64.2, n=3)
-7%
58.2 (8.4 - 83.3, n=175, last 2 years)
-9%
0510152025303540455055606061606160616160616061606161606160616160616061606161606160616061615961606160616160616061606161606160616160616061606161606160616061616061606160616160616061606161606160616160616061606161606160616061616061606160616160616061606161606160616160616061606161606160616061616061606160616061616061606160616160616061616061606160616160616061606161596160616061616061606160616160616061616061606160616160616061606161606160616061616061606160616160616061616061606160616160616061606161606160616061616061606160616160616061616061606160616160616061606161606159616060606160596060616159606059596061605960606060615861585759596060615959575760596058615958605859596060606158595960596061596058606059595959596060586059596056595961596060606058605960615860595959616059605859586159596059566058616060596060595959585859595960596059606060585754606061606061606160616160616061606161606160616160616061606161606160616061615961606160616160616061606161606160616160616061606161606160616061616061606160616160616061606161606160616160616061606161606160616061616061606160616160616061606161606160616160616061606161606160616061616061596160606061605960606161596060595960616059606060606158615857595960606159595757605960586159586058595960606061585959605960615960586060595959595960605860595960565959615960606060586059606158605959596160596058595861595960595660586160605960605959595858595959605960596060605857546060616030302931303030303030303130302930303031293129283129312931293030303129302931303030293129313030303030303030303030303129312931293130303030303030303030303030303030303030303031293129313030303030303030303030303030303030303129303030303031293130303029313030303030303130303030303060616061606161606160616061616061606161606160616061616061606160616159616061606161606160616061616061606161606160616061616061606160616160616061606161606160616061616061606161606160616061616061606160616160616061606161606160616061616061606161606160616061616061606160616160615961606060616059606061615960605959606160596060606061586158575959606061595957576059605861595860585959606060615859596059606159605860605959595959606058605959605659596159606060605860596061586059595961605960585958615959605956605861606059606059595958585959596059605960606058575460606160303029313030303030303031303029303030312931292831293129312930303031293029313030302931293130303030303030303030303031293129312931303030303030303030303030303030303030303030312931293130303030303030303030303030303030303031293030303030312931303030293130303030303031303030303030303030303129303030303030303129303030312930303030293129313030293130293030303129303030293031303030303030303030293129303029312931303029303030303129303030303031293030312931293030303030303129303030293130303029313030303030303030303030302931303030293129303030303030303030303030302431Tooltip
; Dead Trigger 2; 1.7.00: Ø60.6 (59-61)
; League of Legends: Wild Rift; High Definition; 2.1.0.3849: Ø59.4 (54-61)
; League of Legends: Wild Rift; max; 2.1.0.3849: Ø30 (28-31)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.2.0: Ø29.9 (24-31)
Max. terhelés
 36.4 °C36 °C35.2 °C 
 35.4 °C35.2 °C36.1 °C 
 34.5 °C34.6 °C36 °C 
Maximum: 36.4 °C
Átlag: 35.5 °C
31.5 °C33.2 °C35 °C
30.6 °C32.6 °C33.4 °C
31 °C32.4 °C32.5 °C
Maximum: 35 °C
Átlag: 32.5 °C
Tápegység (max.)  25.4 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.835.92522.630.23119.227.24021.430.25032.841.26318.6278018.126.910015.428.812510.723.11601737.620014.941.825013.252.531512.559.540011.561.150010.565.66309.967.880011.971.9100010.674.5125013.67816001474.9200012.977.6250011.777.9315012.976.1400013.176.8500013.380.7630013.87680001470.31000013.565.71250014.262.8160001757.5SPL2588.1N0.671.6median 13.2median 67.8Delta1.211.938.946.339.337.531.128.433.533.134.537.925.428.119.219.518.519.416.823.814.936.911.643.110.948.311.653.710.758.810.761.810.261.317.764.715.269.810.769.49.57110.470.110.66910.966.412.267.912.673.713.273.913.877.514.570.915.46016.156.966.424.982.920.40.654.1median 12.2median 64.72.39.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5GSamsung Galaxy A42 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A42 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.02 / 0.23 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.68 / 2.16 / 2.2 Watt
Terhelés midlight 3.63 / 5.78 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
5000 mAh
Oppo A73 5G
4040 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
5160 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 800U
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-59%
14%
-61%
-28%
9%
-13%
Idle Minimum *
0.68
1.5
-121%
0.58
15%
1.6
-135%
0.93
-37%
0.787 (0.68 - 0.91, n=3)
-16%
0.934 (0.37 - 2.5, n=234, last 2 years)
-37%
Idle Average *
2.16
2.1
3%
1.86
14%
2
7%
2.47
-14%
1.693 (1.17 - 2.16, n=3)
22%
1.843 (0.65 - 3.94, n=234, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
2.9
-32%
1.88
15%
2.6
-18%
2.51
-14%
1.737 (1.23 - 2.2, n=3)
21%
2.1 (0.69 - 4.2, n=234, last 2 years)
5%
Load Average *
3.63
6.7
-85%
3.1
15%
7.1
-96%
5.62
-55%
3.41 (2.76 - 3.85, n=3)
6%
4.46 (2.1 - 8.4, n=234, last 2 years)
-23%
Load Maximum *
5.78
9.2
-59%
5.01
13%
9.5
-64%
6.93
-20%
5.1 (4.57 - 5.78, n=3)
12%
7.24 (3.16 - 12.3, n=234, last 2 years)
-25%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
59h 24min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
18h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 16min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
5h 02min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
5000 mAh
Oppo A73 5G
4040 mAh
realme 7 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A42 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
5160 mAh
Battery Runtime
-36%
26%
-9%
-12%
-11%
Reader / Idle
3564
1549
-57%
2015
-43%
2427
-32%
H.264
1216
581
-52%
1103
-9%
1188
-2%
WiFi v1.3
1133
914
-19%
1426
26%
1026
-9%
967
-15%
1116
-2%
Load
302
252
-17%
364
21%
280
-7%

Pro

+ 5G és NFC
+ dual SIM, VoLTE és VoWiFi
+ alacsony SAR értékek
+ sztereó hangszórók
+ IR blaster és audió jack
+ nappali fényben jó kamera
+ nagyon hosszú üzemidő
+ gyors középkategóriás SoC
+ gyors töltés 18 watton

Kontra

- nincs IP minősítés
- csak 4 GB RAM
- nincs széles látószögű lencse
- csak 60 Hz-es kijelző

Összegzés - Olcsó telefon kevés kompromisszummal

In review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T. Test device provided by Xiaomi Germany.
In review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T. Test device provided by Xiaomi Germany.

A Xiaomi egy átfogóan vonzó csomagot állít össze a Redmi Note 9T-vel, ami különösen érdekes azoknak a vásárlóknak, akik egy olcsó 5G telefont szeretnének, mivel pillanatnyilag szinte lehetetlen ennél kevesebbért hozzájutni ilyen készülékhez. A 128 GB tárhellyel rendelkező realme 7 5G viszont árban nagyon közel áll a Xiaomi telefonhoz. A Redmi Note 9T 64 GB-s verziója néhány euróval kerül kevesebbe, így az értékelés írásakor ez a legolcsóbb 5G telefon a piacon.

A Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G telefon erős konfigurációt kínál alacsony áron.

A teljes csomag még az 5G nélkül is jó, a versenytársakat viszont nem egyszerű lerázni. De először lássuk, melyek a Redmi Note 9T további előnyei: Mindenképpen ide tartozik a nagyon tartós és gyorsan újratölthető 5.000 mAh-s akkumulátor, a szolid IPS kijelző és a gyors MediaTek egylapkás rendszer (SoC), amely komoly nyomást gyakorol más középkategóriás telefonokra. Továbbá vannak még jó extrák is, mint a VoLTE/VoWiFi, sztereó hangszórók, egy audió jack és egy IR blaster.

Ha az 5G nem feltétlenül szükséges, akkor árkategóriájában a Redmi Note 9T nem győztes minden téren. Magán a Xiaomi-n belül erős versenytársakat találunk: A Xiaomi POCO X3 NFC 6 GB RAM-mal rendelkezik 4 GB helyett, valamint jobb kamerával, 120 Hz-es kijelzővel, és valamivel olcsóbb, mint a Redmi Note 9T.

Ár és elérhetőség

Az írás idején a Redmi Note 9T 128 GB-s verziója Amazon-on 325 dollárért érhető el, 64-s verzió pedig 299.99 dollárba kerül.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G - 02/09/2021 v7
Manuel Masiero

Váz
83%
Billentyűzet
67 / 75 → 89%
Érintőpad
89%
Csatlakoztathatóság
49 / 70 → 70%
Súly
88%
Akkumulátor
92%
Kijelző
85%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
26 / 64 → 40%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
72 / 86 → 84%
Hőmérséklet
91%
Zaj
100%
Audio
71 / 90 → 79%
Camera
56%
Átlag
75%
80%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Stephanie Chamberlain
Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 361 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020
contact me via: LinkedIn
Ninh Duy
Translator: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 186207 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G smartphone rövid értékelés: 5G a kis költségvetésnek
Manuel Masiero, 2021-07- 1 (Update: 2021-07- 1)