Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Smartphone rövid értékelés - A jobbik Redmi 9 egy 64-MP-es négyes kamerával

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Brand: Xiaomi

Apró különbségek nagy hatással. Papíron a Redmi Note 9 a Redmi 9 testvér kicsivel jobb változata. Ezek az apró jobbítások a műszaki adatokban észrevehető különbségekként nyilvánulnak meg a mindennapi használatban. Tovább olvasva kiderül, hogyan boldogul a tesztünkben a Xiaomi.

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (fordította Zoltán Kiss), 12/22/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Redmi Note Széria)

Processzor

Mediatek Helio G85 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55

Grafikus adapter

ARM Mali-G52 MP2

Memória

3072 MB

Kijelző

6.53 hüvelyk 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, kapacitív érintőképernyő, IPS LCD, Gorilla Glass 5, fényes: igen, 60 Hz

Háttértár

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 47.5 GB ingyenes

Csatlakozók

1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm-es audió port, Kártyaolvasó: microSD kártya, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: közelségérzékelő, gyorsulásmérő, giroszkóp, digitális iránytű, USB C, Miracast, IR blaster, nano coating

Hálózat

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: B2/3/5/8; WCDMA: B1/2/4/5/8; FDD-LTE: B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28, TDD-LTE: B38/40/41, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Méret

magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 8.9 x 162.3 x 77.2

Akkumulátor

5020 mAh Lítium-Polimer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operációs rendszer

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8, 26 mm, 1/2.0", 0,8 µm) + 8 MP (f/2.2, 118˚, 1/4.0", 1,12 µm) + 2 MP (f/2.4) + 2 MP (f/2.4), Kamera2 API: teljes
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.3, 29mm, 1/3.1", 1.12 µm)

További jellegzetességek

Hangszórók: mono, Billentyűzet: vỉrtual, moduláris töltő, USB-C kábel, SIM-kiadó eszköz, használati utasítás, MiUI 12, 12 Hónap Garancia, Widevine L1, SAR (fej: 0,8 W/kg, test: 1,14 W/kg), fanless

Súly

199 g, Tápegység: 87 g

Ár

199 Euró

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
80 %	12/2020	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2	199 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.53"	2340x1080
78 %	06/2020	Xiaomi Redmi 9 Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2	198 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.53"	2340x1080
81 %	07/2020	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S SD 720G, Adreno 618	209 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
76 %	06/2020	Samsung Galaxy A21s Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2	192 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1600x720
78 %	06/2020	realme 6i Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2	199 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1600x720
75 %	06/2020	Sony Xperia L4 Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320	178 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.20"	1680x720

» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja

Size Comparison

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S realme 6i Samsung Galaxy A21s Xiaomi Redmi 9 Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Sony Xperia L4 ❌

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone (5.59 - 1599, n=298, last 2 years)	395 MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	348 (325^min - 355^max) MBit/s ∼88% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	347 (172^min - 352^max) MBit/s ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A21s Mali-G52 MP2, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	310 (269^min - 342^max) MBit/s ∼78% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	256 (247^min - 263^max) MBit/s ∼65% -26%
Sony Xperia L4 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash	109 (103^min - 114^max) MBit/s ∼28% -69%
realme 6i Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	66.5 (34^min - 69^max) MBit/s ∼17% -81%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone (15.5 - 1414, n=298, last 2 years)	403 MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash	355 (327^min - 366^max) MBit/s ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A21s Mali-G52 MP2, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash	326 (280^min - 333^max) MBit/s ∼81% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash	308 (290^min - 337^max) MBit/s ∼76% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	286 (225^min - 321^max) MBit/s ∼71% -19%
Sony Xperia L4 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash	120 (106^min - 124^max) MBit/s ∼30% -66%
realme 6i Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash	36.1 (9^min - 57^max) MBit/s ∼9% -90%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø350 (327-366)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø341 (172-352)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angle Low light 5x Zoom Ultra wide angle Wide angle

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck-hu.com/Xiaomi-Redmi-Note-9-Smartphone-roevid-ertekeles-A-jobbik-Redmi-9-egy-64-MP-es-negyes-kameraval.511499.0.html">Xiaomi Redmi Note 9</a> — Xiaomi Redmi Note 9


535 cd/m²	527 cd/m²	492 cd/m²
539 cd/m²	553 cd/m²	508 cd/m²
538 cd/m²	542 cd/m²	505 cd/m²

Fényerő megoszlás

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 553 cd/m² Átlag: 526.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.28 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 89 %
Centrumban: 553 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 4608:1 (Fekete: 0.12 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
97.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 IPS LCD, 2340x1080, 6.53	Xiaomi Redmi 9 IPS LCD, 2340x1080, 6.53	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67	Samsung Galaxy A21s PLS, 1600x720, 6.50	realme 6i IPS, 1600x720, 6.50	Sony Xperia L4 IPS, 1680x720, 6.20
Screen		-68%	-63%	-71%	-62%	-63%
Brightness middle	553	476 -14%	622 12%	540 -2%	518 -6%	429 -22%
Brightness	527	436 -17%	612 16%	509 -3%	484 -8%	404 -23%
Brightness Distribution	89	86 -3%	94 6%	91 2%	89 0%	92 3%
Black Level *	0.12	0.67 -458%	0.56 -367%	0.36 -200%	0.26 -117%	0.26 -117%
Contrast	4608	710 -85%	1111 -76%	1500 -67%	1992 -57%	1650 -64%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	3.8	3.51 8%	3.98 -5%	6.58 -73%	5.8 -53%	6.14 -62%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	8.7	9.38 -8%	7.33 16%	11.55 -33%	11 -26%	10.51 -21%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	2.2	1.5 32%	4.5 -105%	6.4 -191%	7.3 -232%	6.6 -200%
Gamma	2.3 ^96%	2.166 ^102%	2.206 ^100%	2.206 ^100%	2.23 ^99%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6727 ^97%	6485 ^100%	7361 ^88%	8482 ^77%	8037 ^81%	8346 ^78%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)			114.9

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.4 ms rise
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19.6 ms rise
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38.3 ms).

Geekbench 5.3 | PCMark for Android | VRMark | BaseMark OS II

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	356 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	363 Points ∼65% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	559 Points ∼100% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A21s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	182 Points ∼33% -49%
realme 6i Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	387 Points ∼69% +9%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	150 Points ∼27% -58%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (354 - 369, n=3)	360 Points ∼64% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 1604, n=216, last 2 years)	559 Points ∼100% +57%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1259 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1281 Points ∼67% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1690 Points ∼88% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A21s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1081 Points ∼56% -14%
realme 6i Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1348 Points ∼70% +7%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	883 Points ∼46% -30%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (1259 - 1351, n=3)	1305 Points ∼68% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (248 - 4201, n=216, last 2 years)	1925 Points ∼100% +53%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1179 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1109 Points ∼55% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A21s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	565 Points ∼28% -52%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (1163 - 1179, n=2)	1171 Points ∼58% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (72 - 6524, n=108, last 2 years)	2030 Points ∼100% +72%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1198 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1124 Points ∼53% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A21s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	593 Points ∼28% -51%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (1185 - 1233, n=3)	1205 Points ∼57% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (255 - 7514, n=112, last 2 years)	2124 Points ∼100% +77%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	11421 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	11534 Points ∼96% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	9027 Points ∼75% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A21s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	7113 Points ∼59% -38%
realme 6i Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	12043 Points ∼100% +5%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	6909 Points ∼57% -40%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (11421 - 11889, n=2)	11655 Points ∼97% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2689 - 19989, n=238, last 2 years)	9845 Points ∼82% -14%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	8698 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	8795 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	7673 Points ∼87% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A21s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	5457 Points ∼62% -37%
realme 6i Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	8733 Points ∼99% 0%
Sony Xperia L4 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	5251 Points ∼60% -40%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (8655 - 8698, n=3)	8674 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=272, last 2 years)	7766 Points ∼88% -11%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1375 Score ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1330 Score ∼40% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2416 Score ∼73% +76%
Samsung Galaxy A21s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	994 Score ∼30% -28%
realme 6i Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1352 Score ∼41% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G85	1375 Score ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (421 - 7649, n=56, last 2 years)	3290 Score ∼100% +139%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	2285 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	2273 Points ∼64% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3542 Points ∼100% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A21s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1644 Points ∼46% -28%
realme 6i Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2216 Points ∼63% -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G85	2285 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (323 - 6959, n=205, last 2 years)	3513 Points ∼99% +54%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	5010 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	4865 Points ∼71% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6828 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A21s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	3382 Points ∼50% -32%
realme 6i Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	4516 Points ∼66% -10%
Average Mediatek Helio G85	5010 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1160 - 14189, n=205, last 2 years)	6448 Points ∼94% +29%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	2536 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	2654 Points ∼62% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	4295 Points ∼100% +69%
Samsung Galaxy A21s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1884 Points ∼44% -26%
realme 6i Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	2542 Points ∼59% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G85	2536 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (522 - 9044, n=205, last 2 years)	4110 Points ∼96% +62%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1845 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1759 Points ∼32% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3807 Points ∼70% +106%
Samsung Galaxy A21s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1159 Points ∼21% -37%
realme 6i Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1735 Points ∼32% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G85	1845 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (349 - 16996, n=205, last 2 years)	5414 Points ∼100% +193%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1198 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	1243 Points ∼88% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1410 Points ∼100% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A21s Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072	990 Points ∼70% -17%
realme 6i Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1211 Points ∼86% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio G85	1198 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2169, n=205, last 2 years)	1244 Points ∼88% +4%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=187, last 2 years)	49.4 Points ∼100% +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	48.527 Points ∼98% +62%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 (Chrome 85)	30.521 Points ∼62% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)	29.951 Points ∼61%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (29.2 - 30, n=2)	29.6 Points ∼60% -1%
realme 6i (Chrome 81)	28.96 Points ∼59% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)	19.147 Points ∼39% -36%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	89.457 Points ∼100% +66%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=194, last 2 years)	87.8 Points ∼98% +63%
realme 6i (Chrome 81)	54.343 Points ∼61% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 (Chrome 85)	53.987 Points ∼60% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G85	53.9 Points ∼60% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)	53.874 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)	28.012 Points ∼31% -48%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=165, last 2 years)	50.5 runs/min ∼100% +87%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chome 81)	44.1 runs/min ∼87% +63%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 (Chrome 85)	28.1 runs/min ∼56% +4%
realme 6i (Chrome 81)	27.7 runs/min ∼55% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)	27 runs/min ∼53%
Average Mediatek Helio G85	27 runs/min ∼53% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chome 84)	15 runs/min ∼30% -44%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=206, last 2 years)	76.9 Points ∼100% +71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	69 Points ∼90% +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)	45 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi 9	45 Points ∼59% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (43 - 45, n=2)	44 Points ∼57% -2%
realme 6i (Chrome 81)	43 Points ∼56% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)	35 Points ∼46% -22%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	17303 Points ∼100% +68%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=215, last 2 years)	16888 Points ∼98% +64%
realme 6i (Chrome 81)	10485 Points ∼61% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 (Chrome 85)	10432 Points ∼60% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)	10299 Points ∼60%
Average Mediatek Helio G85	10299 Points ∼60% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)	4976 Points ∼29% -52%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)	9174.1 ms * ∼100% -135%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=218, last 2 years)	4305 ms * ∼47% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi 9 (Chrome 85)	4076.3 ms * ∼44% -4%
realme 6i (Chrome 81)	3937.5 ms * ∼43% -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (3901 - 3939, n=2)	3920 ms * ∼43% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)	3901.3 ms * ∼43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	2794.2 ms * ∼30% +28%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9	Xiaomi Redmi 9	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S	Samsung Galaxy A21s	realme 6i	Sony Xperia L4	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-23%	20%	-13%	4%	-22%	-24%	36%
Sequential Read 256KB	306.57	289.87 -5%	496.6 62%	307 0%	309.45 1%	293.4 -4%	274 (95.6 - 704, n=164) -11%	724 (41.9 - 2037, n=283, last 2 years) 136%
Sequential Write 256KB	248.14	119.76 -52%	214.8 -13%	104.3 -58%	256.36 3%	165 -34%	178 (40 - 274, n=164) -28%	312 (11.9 - 1321, n=283, last 2 years) 26%
Random Read 4KB	65.13	49.09 -25%	137 110%	77.2 19%	73.46 13%	61.2 -6%	58.3 (11.4 - 149, n=164) -10%	129 (13.5 - 325, n=283, last 2 years) 98%
Random Write 4KB	146.94	60.71 -59%	123.6 -16%	89.5 -39%	150.87 3%	22.5 -85%	29 (3.4 - 147, n=164) -80%	113 (4.97 - 330, n=283, last 2 years) -23%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	84.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	84.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	74.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -12%	80 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	84.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	77.5 (21.1 - 108, n=143) -8%	76.1 (13.4 - 154, n=185, last 2 years) -10%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	63.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	54.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -14%	66.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 5%	64.46 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	62.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	58.5 (11.2 - 83.3, n=143) -8%	58.1 (1.7 - 83.3, n=185, last 2 years) -9%

PUBG mobile

; Smooth: Ø39.6 (35-42)

; Balanced: Ø39.8 (38-41)

; HD: Ø29.9 (28-31)

Real Racing 3

: Ø53 (23-60)

Dead Trigger 2

: Ø59.3 (47-60)

Max. terhelés

Üresjárat


35.8 °C	35.1 °C	34.2 °C
34.8 °C	34 °C	34.5 °C
33.5 °C	32.4 °C	32.2 °C

Maximum: 35.8 °C
Átlag: 34.1 °C


30.5 °C	32.5 °C	34.4 °C
30.3 °C	31.2 °C	33.5 °C
30.7 °C	32.4 °C	32.5 °C

Maximum: 34.4 °C
Átlag: 32 °C

Tápegység (max.) 23.1 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A21s audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás

Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét	0.02 / 0.23 Watt
Üresjárat	0.74 / 2.17 / 2.2 Watt
Terhelés	4.17 / 6.11 Watt


Kulcs: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 5020 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 9 5020 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S 5020 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A21s 5000 mAh	realme 6i 5000 mAh	Average Mediatek Helio G85	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-28%	-32%	-30%	23%	-24%	-6%
Idle Minimum *	0.74	1.4 -89%	1.5 -103%	1.5 -103%	0.37 50%	1.22 (0.74 - 1.7, n=2) -65%	0.932 (0.37 - 2.5, n=234, last 2 years) -26%
Idle Average *	2.17	1.7 22%	2.1 3%	2.1 3%	1.62 25%	2.54 (2.17 - 2.9, n=2) -17%	1.843 (0.82 - 3.94, n=234, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Maximum *	2.2	2.1 5%	2.5 -14%	2.9 -32%	1.69 23%	2.6 (2.2 - 3, n=2) -18%	2.12 (0.85 - 4.2, n=234, last 2 years) 4%
Load Average *	4.17	5.7 -37%	5.2 -25%	4.6 -10%	3.61 13%	4.74 (4.17 - 5.3, n=2) -14%	4.43 (2.1 - 8.4, n=234, last 2 years) -6%
Load Maximum *	6.11	8.5 -39%	7.5 -23%	6.6 -8%	5.9 3%	6.56 (6.11 - 7, n=2) -7%	7.21 (3.16 - 12.3, n=234, last 2 years) -18%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő

Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)		38h 14min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		14h 27min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 36min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)		5h 14min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 5020 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 9 5020 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S 5020 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A21s 5000 mAh	realme 6i 5000 mAh	Sony Xperia L4 3580 mAh
Battery Runtime		-2%	10%	-4%	52%	-10%
Reader / Idle	2294	2337 2%	2263 -1%	2009 -12%
H.264	1116	1171 5%	1269 14%	1087 -3%
WiFi v1.3	867	804 -7%	1187 37%	943 9%	1318 52%	783 -10%
Load	314	289 -8%	279 -11%	287 -9%

Pro

+ 1080p IPS panel gazdag kontraszttal

+ gyors WLAN

+ dizájn és kivitelezés

+ hosszú üzemidő

+ tripla SIM foglalat

+ szolid SoC...

Kontra

- ...lassú tárolóval (eMMC)

- sötét árnyék a kameralyuk körül

- nincs UHD videó opció

Redmi Note 9 összegzés - Kitűnő belépő az okostelefonok világába

In review: Redmi Note 9. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de.

A Xiaomi a következő szavakkal reklámozza a megfizethető, középkategóriás okostelefonját: „Minden, amire szükséged van.” A shenzeni kínai gyártó nem téved nagyot a reklámszlogenjével, mivel a Redmi Note 9 nagyon jó okostelefon-élményt nyújt körülbelül 150 eurós áron - viszont egyértelműen ajánljuk a 20 euróval nagyobb befektetést a 4 GB-os változatért.

Aki egy megfizethető okostelefont keres kevesebb mint 200 euróért, az mindenképpen vegye figyelembe a Redmi Note 9-et.

A Redmi 9-hez képest a Note modell jobb hangszóróval és fő kamerával rendelkezik. A világosabb IPS panelnek egyértelműen nagyobb a kontrasztja és stabilabbak a látószögei, és ennek a mindennapi használatban szemmel látható az előnye. Továbbá a Note 9 alaptartozéka a gyorstöltő.

Viszont a Redmi Note 9 még mindig egy belépőszintű okostelefon, és az is marad. Ennek megfelelően kompromisszumot kell kötnünk a processzor választását, a kamera - főként az ultraszéles látószögű kamera - minőségét, valamint a tárhely és WLAN sebességét illetően.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 - 2020-09-16 09/16/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Váz

87%

Billentyűzet

67 / 75 → 89%

Érintőpad

89%

Csatlakoztathatóság

50 / 70 → 72%

Súly

88%

Akkumulátor

91%

Kijelző

87%

Játékok alatti teljesítmény

14 / 64 → 22%

Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény

64 / 86 → 74%

Hőmérséklet

92%

Zaj

100%

Audio

77 / 90 → 85%

Camera

66%

Átlag

75%

80%

Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Linked Articles

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Redmi Note Széria)

Teszt

•

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Smartphon...

Teszt

•

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T rövid ért...

Teszt

•

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Smartphone...

Teszt

•

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Smartphone...

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 210 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 180713 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!