Notebookcheck

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Smartphone rövid értékelés - Nagy Kijelző, Alacsony Ár

Pixelnövekedés. Mit kapunk, ha egy nagy felbontású, zoomra képes kamerát egy óriási akkumulátorral kombinálunk? Egy Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S-t mindössze 210 dollárért. A továbbiakban kiderítjük, milyen kompromisszumok (ha léteznek) járnak ezzel.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger (fordította Zoltán Kiss),
Android ARM Smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Redmi Note Széria)
Processzor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G 8 x 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 618
Memória
6144 MB 
Kijelző
6.67 hüvelyk 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, kapacitív érintőképernyő, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, fényes: igen, 60 Hz
Háttértár
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3,5 mm-es audió jack, Kártyaolvasó: microSD 512 GB-ig, dedikált, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: gyorsulásmérő, giroszkóp, közelségérzékelő, iránytű, USB-C
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1,800/​1,900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 8.8 x 165.8 x 76.7
Akkumulátor
5020 mAh Lítium-Polimer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operációs rendszer
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48.0MP, f/​1.79, fázis-különbség AF, LED vaku, videók @2160p/​30fps, 720p/​960fps (kamera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, széles látószögű lencse (kamera 2); 5.0MP, f/​2.4, makró (kamera 3), 2.0MP, f/​2.4, mélységélesség (kamera 4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.48, Videók @1080p/​30fps
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: monó hangszóró a készülék alján, Billentyűzet: virtuális, töltő, USB kábel, szilikon tok, SIM kiadó eszköz, 24 Hónap Garancia, fej SAR: 0,72W/​kg, test SAR0,98W/​kg; LTE sebesség: 800 Mbps (letöltés), 150 Mbps (feltöltés), fanless
Súly
209 g, Tápegység: 76 g
Ár
229 Euró
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Test Group

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81 %
07/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
77 %
07/2020
Motorola Moto G8
SD 665, Adreno 610
188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.4"1560x720
81 %
04/2020
Huawei P40 Lite
Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6
183 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2310x1080
76 %
12/2019
Gigaset GS290
Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2
190 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
81 %
10/2019
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4
200 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.53"2340x1080

Size Comparison

165.8 mm 76.7 mm 8.8 mm 209 g161.3 mm 75.8 mm 9 mm 188 g161.35 mm 76.4 mm 8.79 mm 200 g159.2 mm 76.3 mm 8.7 mm 183 g157 mm 75.1 mm 9.65 mm 190 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
353 (min: 330, max: 362) MBit/s ∼100% +23%
Huawei P40 Lite
Mali-G52 MP6, Kirin 810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
298 (min: 61, max: 334) MBit/s ∼84% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
286 (min: 225, max: 321) MBit/s ∼81%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=562)
267 MBit/s ∼76% -7%
Gigaset GS290
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 64 GB eMMC Flash
111 (min: 98, max: 120) MBit/s ∼31% -61%
Motorola Moto G8
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
54.4 (min: 38, max: 57) MBit/s ∼15% -81%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P40 Lite
Mali-G52 MP6, Kirin 810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 (min: 286, max: 403) MBit/s ∼100% +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
319 (min: 302, max: 325) MBit/s ∼94% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
256 (min: 247, max: 263) MBit/s ∼76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=562)
253 MBit/s ∼75% -1%
Gigaset GS290
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 64 GB eMMC Flash
107 (min: 81, max: 121) MBit/s ∼32% -58%
Motorola Moto G8
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.8 (min: 40, max: 67) MBit/s ∼17% -78%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø286 (225-321)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø256 (247-263)
Garmin Edge 520: overview
Garmin Edge 520: overview
Garmin Edge 520: turning point
Garmin Edge 520: turning point
Garmin Edge 520: bridge
Garmin Edge 520: bridge
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S: overview
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S: overview
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S: turning point
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S: turning point
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S: bridge
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S: bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Main camera sample photo
Main camera sample photo
Wide-angle camera sample photo
Wide-angle camera sample photo
Macro camera sample photo
Macro camera sample photo
ColorChecker
29.8 ∆E
55.2 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
62.6 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
75.6 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
70.2 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
24 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S: 46.88 ∆E min: 13.76 - max: 93.71 ∆E
ColorChecker
14.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S: 7.3 ∆E min: 2.68 - max: 15.59 ∆E
615
cd/m²
628
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
622
cd/m²
602
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 628 cd/m² Átlag: 611.7 cd/m² Minimum: 18.8 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 94 %
Centrumban: 622 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1111:1 (Fekete: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.98 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6
114.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.206
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Motorola Moto G8
IPS, 1560x720, 6.4
Huawei P40 Lite
IPS, 2310x1080, 6.4
Gigaset GS290
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
Screen
15%
0%
11%
-1%
Brightness middle
622
504
-19%
478
-23%
465
-25%
669
8%
Brightness
612
452
-26%
448
-27%
460
-25%
630
3%
Brightness Distribution
94
83
-12%
87
-7%
88
-6%
87
-7%
Black Level *
0.56
0.28
50%
0.49
12%
0.2
64%
0.42
25%
Contrast
1111
1800
62%
976
-12%
2325
109%
1593
43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.98
3.84
4%
3
25%
5.3
-33%
4.8
-21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.33
6.1
17%
5.6
24%
7.3
-0%
9
-23%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.5
2.7
40%
4.1
9%
4.2
7%
6.2
-38%
Gamma
2.206 100%
2.235 98%
2.26 97%
2.09 105%
2.24 98%
CCT
7361 88%
7125 91%
7282 89%
6558 99%
7846 83%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
114.9

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17957 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.1 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1005 Points ∼62%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
447 Points ∼27% -56%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
709 Points ∼43% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (982 - 1063, n=3)
1017 Points ∼62% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=66)
1633 Points ∼100% +62%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1173 Points ∼47%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
363 Points ∼15% -69%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2493 Points ∼100% +113%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
688 Points ∼28% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (1163 - 1201, n=3)
1179 Points ∼47% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=61)
1759 Points ∼71% +50%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points ∼85%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1280 Points ∼64% -24%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
1949 Points ∼98% +15%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
875 Points ∼44% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (1690 - 1771, n=3)
1740 Points ∼87% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (445 - 3531, n=89)
1990 Points ∼100% +18%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
559 Points ∼93%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
309 Points ∼51% -45%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
604 Points ∼100% +8%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
150 Points ∼25% -73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (559 - 569, n=3)
565 Points ∼94% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=89)
567 Points ∼94% +1%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
5702 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=351)
4852 Points ∼85%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6263 Points ∼82%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5134 Points ∼67% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
7624 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
 
6263 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=413)
4955 Points ∼65% -21%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2620 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1495 Points ∼57% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2484 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
 
2620 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=413)
1510 Points ∼58% -42%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7673 Points ∼77%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6969 Points ∼70% -9%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
9164 Points ∼92% +19%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5068 Points ∼51% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
9967 Points ∼100% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (7673 - 10106, n=3)
8536 Points ∼86% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=490)
5834 Points ∼59% -24%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9027 Points ∼60%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9051 Points ∼61% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
12070 Points ∼81% +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
14946 Points ∼100% +66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (9027 - 13777, n=3)
10632 Points ∼71% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=648)
6373 Points ∼43% -29%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2765 Points ∼93%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2240 Points ∼75% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2977 Points ∼100% +8%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2129 Points ∼72% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2543 Points ∼85% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2562 - 2765, n=3)
2683 Points ∼90% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=149)
2636 Points ∼89% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2257 Points ∼77%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
914 Points ∼31% -60%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2552 Points ∼88% +13%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
466 Points ∼16% -79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1978 Points ∼68% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2250 - 2257, n=3)
2254 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=149)
2916 Points ∼100% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2353 Points ∼89%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1052 Points ∼40% -55%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2636 Points ∼100% +12%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
564 Points ∼21% -76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2087 Points ∼79% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2317 - 2353, n=3)
2337 Points ∼89% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6644, n=149)
2626 Points ∼100% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3256 Points ∼82%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2379 Points ∼60% -27%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3972 Points ∼100% +22%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1619 Points ∼41% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3326 Points ∼84% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3067 - 3256, n=3)
3186 Points ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=496)
2175 Points ∼55% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2551 Points ∼93%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
990 Points ∼36% -61%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2752 Points ∼100% +8%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
431 Points ∼16% -83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2322 Points ∼84% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2539 - 2558, n=3)
2549 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=496)
2075 Points ∼75% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2680 Points ∼91%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1138 Points ∼39% -58%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2954 Points ∼100% +10%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
515 Points ∼17% -81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2412 Points ∼82% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2656 - 2680, n=3)
2668 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=497)
1926 Points ∼65% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3267 Points ∼82%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2347 Points ∼59% -28%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
4003 Points ∼100% +23%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1619 Points ∼40% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3362 Points ∼84% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3125 - 3267, n=3)
3206 Points ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=526)
2085 Points ∼52% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3803 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1669 Points ∼44% -56%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3488 Points ∼92% -8%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
642 Points ∼17% -83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2323 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3785 - 3835, n=3)
3808 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=526)
2762 Points ∼73% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3669 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1783 Points ∼49% -51%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3591 Points ∼98% -2%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
741 Points ∼20% -80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2412 Points ∼66% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3645 - 3669, n=3)
3655 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=526)
2321 Points ∼63% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3152 Points ∼86%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2409 Points ∼66% -24%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3676 Points ∼100% +17%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1541 Points ∼42% -51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3280 Points ∼89% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3083 - 3170, n=3)
3135 Points ∼85% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=576)
2062 Points ∼56% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2369 Points ∼86%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
945 Points ∼34% -60%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2740 Points ∼100% +16%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
440 Points ∼16% -81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2218 Points ∼81% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2356 - 2388, n=3)
2371 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=576)
1735 Points ∼63% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2507 Points ∼86%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1093 Points ∼38% -56%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
2904 Points ∼100% +16%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
523 Points ∼18% -79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2390 Points ∼82% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (2499 - 2514, n=3)
2507 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7323, n=577)
1658 Points ∼57% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3070 Points ∼84%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2405 Points ∼66% -22%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3638 Points ∼100% +19%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1545 Points ∼42% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3267 Points ∼90% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3070 - 3263, n=3)
3136 Points ∼86% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=618)
1924 Points ∼53% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1632 Points ∼45% -55%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3384 Points ∼93% -7%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
630 Points ∼17% -83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2219 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3620 - 3683, n=3)
3650 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=617)
2277 Points ∼62% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3501 Points ∼99%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1758 Points ∼50% -50%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3437 Points ∼98% -2%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
725 Points ∼21% -79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2390 Points ∼68% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3501 - 3534, n=3)
3521 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=620)
1961 Points ∼56% -44%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20019 Points ∼72%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24457 Points ∼88% +22%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
27654 Points ∼100% +38%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
11675 Points ∼42% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
22928 Points ∼83% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (14849 - 20054, n=3)
18307 Points ∼66% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=766)
15263 Points ∼55% -24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
52700 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24828 Points ∼47% -53%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
47563 Points ∼90% -10%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
11180 Points ∼21% -79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
39137 Points ∼74% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (51789 - 53600, n=3)
52696 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=764)
25897 Points ∼49% -51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38671 Points ∼94%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24745 Points ∼60% -36%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
41003 Points ∼100% +6%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
11286 Points ∼28% -71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
33832 Points ∼83% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (33926 - 38671, n=3)
36971 Points ∼90% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=764)
20366 Points ∼50% -47%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
86 fps ∼97%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼40% -58%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
89 fps ∼100% +3%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
22 fps ∼25% -74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
82 fps ∼92% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (85 - 86, n=3)
85.3 fps ∼96% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=772)
43.9 fps ∼49% -49%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps ∼99%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
42 fps ∼70% -29%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
59 fps ∼99% 0%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
20 fps ∼34% -66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
58 fps ∼97% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (59 - 60, n=3)
59.7 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=781)
30.5 fps ∼51% -48%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
42 fps ∼79%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼36% -55%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
53 fps ∼100% +26%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼21% -74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
49 fps ∼92% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (41 - 42, n=3)
41.3 fps ∼78% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=677)
25.8 fps ∼49% -39%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
37 fps ∼71%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼65% -8%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
52 fps ∼100% +41%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
10 fps ∼19% -73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
42 fps ∼81% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (37 - 39, n=3)
38 fps ∼73% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=685)
21.8 fps ∼42% -41%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
31 fps ∼94%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼39% -58%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +6%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6.7 fps ∼20% -78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
29 fps ∼88% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (30 - 31, n=3)
30.3 fps ∼92% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=540)
20.8 fps ∼63% -33%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼79%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
27 fps ∼79% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
34 fps ∼100% +26%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6.1 fps ∼18% -77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
26 fps ∼76% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (27 - 29, n=3)
27.7 fps ∼81% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=542)
18.9 fps ∼56% -30%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼85%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9.1 fps ∼70% -17%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
13 fps ∼100% +18%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2.2 fps ∼17% -80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6.8 fps ∼52% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (11 - 11, n=3)
11 fps ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=288)
11.2 fps ∼86% +2%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7 fps ∼64%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼25% -60%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
7.9 fps ∼72% +13%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1.4 fps ∼13% -80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
11 fps ∼100% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (6.9 - 7, n=3)
6.97 fps ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=286)
8.07 fps ∼73% +15%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼81%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼71% -12%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +24%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3.6 fps ∼17% -79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
17 fps ∼81% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (17 - 17, n=3)
17 fps ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=292)
16.6 fps ∼79% -2%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.2 fps ∼39%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
21 fps ∼100%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3.9 fps ∼19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps ∼90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (18 - 19, n=2)
18.5 fps ∼88%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=291)
19.3 fps ∼92%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼95%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.2 fps ∼38% -60%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
19 fps ∼100% +6%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4 fps ∼21% -78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
16 fps ∼84% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (18 - 18, n=3)
18 fps ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=465)
14 fps ∼74% -22%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼80%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼65% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
20 fps ∼100% +25%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3.7 fps ∼19% -77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
14 fps ∼70% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (16 - 17, n=3)
16.3 fps ∼82% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=469)
12.5 fps ∼63% -22%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
275931 Points ∼86%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
167305 Points ∼52% -39%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
319383 Points ∼100% +16%
Gigaset GS290
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
108862 Points ∼34% -61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
282085 Points ∼88% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (271934 - 275931, n=3)
274443 Points ∼86% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=94)
315184 Points ∼99% +14%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
18.1 (min: 2.3, max: 44.7) fps ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=73)
19.2 fps ∼100%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
21.2 (min: 4.9, max: 40.7) fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=64)
16 fps ∼75%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19.4 (min: 3.7, max: 33.6) fps ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=62)
19.9 fps ∼100%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2416 Score ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3243 Score ∼100% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
 
2416 Score ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=82)
2609 Score ∼80% +8%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1410 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1224 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
1267 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1145 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (1226 - 1410, n=3)
1290 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=709)
807 Points ∼57% -43%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3807 Points ∼88%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1932 Points ∼45% -49%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
4339 Points ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3419 Points ∼79% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3757 - 3807, n=3)
3777 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=709)
2428 Points ∼56% -36%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4295 Points ∼91%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2780 Points ∼59% -35%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
4726 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3609 Points ∼76% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (4295 - 4573, n=3)
4440 Points ∼94% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=709)
1805 Points ∼38% -58%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6828 Points ∼95%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4391 Points ∼61% -36%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
7178 Points ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6155 Points ∼86% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (6828 - 6908, n=3)
6864 Points ∼96% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=709)
3374 Points ∼47% -51%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3542 Points ∼96%
Motorola Moto G8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2318 Points ∼63% -35%
Huawei P40 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144
3695 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3054 Points ∼83% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
  (3444 - 3542, n=3)
3489 Points ∼94% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=709)
1716 Points ∼46% -52%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
55.352 Points ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
48.527 Points ∼88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (47.9 - 48.5, n=2)
48.2 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=171)
40.2 Points ∼73% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
35.298 Points ∼64% -27%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
29.117 Points ∼53% -40%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
91.154 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
89.457 Points ∼98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (86.8 - 89.6, n=3)
88.6 Points ∼97% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
72.098 Points ∼79% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=600)
46.3 Points ∼51% -48%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
33.377 Points ∼37% -63%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
53.2 runs/min ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (44.1 - 45.2, n=2)
44.7 runs/min ∼84% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chome 81)
44.1 runs/min ∼83%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=155)
43.1 runs/min ∼81% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
41.6 runs/min ∼78% -6%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chome 81)
25.4 runs/min ∼48% -42%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
97 Points ∼100% +41%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=236)
69.8 Points ∼72% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
69 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (67 - 71, n=3)
69 Points ∼71% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
55 Points ∼57% -20%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
38 Points ∼39% -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
17925 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
17303 Points ∼97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (17157 - 17303, n=3)
17242 Points ∼96% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
15606 Points ∼87% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=767)
7690 Points ∼43% -56%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
6133 Points ∼34% -65%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=793)
9892 ms * ∼100% -254%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)
6719 ms * ∼68% -140%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)
3001.5 ms * ∼30% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2794 - 3033, n=3)
2892 ms * ∼29% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
2794.2 ms * ∼28%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)
2471.6 ms * ∼25% +12%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9SMotorola Moto G8Huawei P40 LiteGigaset GS290Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-17%
28%
-26%
10%
9%
-37%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
54.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
48.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
70.6 (Nano Memory Card)
29%
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
35%
57.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
58.1 (8.4 - 72.4, n=31)
6%
50.7 (1.7 - 87.1, n=509)
-8%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
74.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
68.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
82.63 (Nano Memory Card)
11%
81.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
71.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
72.9 (13.4 - 88.2, n=31)
-2%
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=509)
-8%
Random Write 4KB
123.6
128.1
4%
175.45
42%
19.77
-84%
180.4
46%
106 (18.2 - 250, n=58)
-14%
33.1 (0.14 - 319, n=856)
-73%
Random Read 4KB
137
57.3
-58%
157.32
15%
54.7
-60%
156.22
14%
142 (96.8 - 179, n=58)
4%
57.1 (1.59 - 324, n=856)
-58%
Sequential Write 256KB
214.8
239
11%
181.69
-15%
196.75
-8%
193.54
-10%
234 (182 - 503, n=58)
9%
122 (2.99 - 911, n=856)
-43%
Sequential Read 256KB
496.6
301
-39%
912.99
84%
274.2
-45%
534.5
8%
760 (427 - 980, n=58)
53%
329 (12.1 - 1802, n=856)
-34%
010203040Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.18.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.18.0: Ø29.8 (19-31)
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.34.1.10: Ø30.2 (29-31)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.34.1.10: Ø30.1 (2-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.2.2a: Ø29.6 (21-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.2.2a: Ø29.6 (23-31)
Max. terhelés
 39.9 °C36.1 °C34.8 °C 
 39.4 °C36.3 °C34.4 °C 
 37.6 °C35.7 °C34.3 °C 
Maximum: 39.9 °C
Átlag: 36.5 °C
31.2 °C36.1 °C39.9 °C
33 °C36 °C37.4 °C
33 °C35.4 °C36.7 °C
Maximum: 39.9 °C
Átlag: 35.4 °C
Tápegység (max.)  39.6 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.430.5253531.93127.126.44026275030.431.26325.228.88022.722.510025.522.112520.124.716019.235.420017.839.425017.845.931516.149.940016.655.750015.962.563014.365.580014.770.4100014.873.6125014.371160014.165.1200016.369.1250014.472.3315013.868.7400013.970.4500014.264.4630014.559.1800014.666.4100001568.11250015.359.11600015.751.6SPL60.964.571.226.981N13.817.725.60.948.4median 15median 64.4Delta1.610.732.428.93530.627.128.42629.830.430.825.226.922.72325.522.920.122.319.230.417.842.817.849.516.152.416.654.315.959.414.36114.767.314.871.814.367.814.166.116.368.914.471.413.870.113.970.514.265.214.561.614.665.21566.615.358.615.741.164.571.226.980.117.725.60.945.7median 15median 61.61.610.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 9SMotorola Moto G8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto G8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 1.5 / 2.1 / 2.5 Watt
Terhelés midlight 5.2 / 7.5 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
Motorola Moto G8
4000 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite
4200 mAh
Gigaset GS290
4700 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
7%
24%
19%
10%
12%
23%
Idle Minimum *
1.5
1.3
13%
0.79
47%
0.88
41%
0.79
47%
1.057 (0.75 - 1.5, n=3)
30%
0.887 (0.2 - 3.4, n=866)
41%
Idle Average *
2.1
2
5%
2.14
-2%
2.05
2%
2.32
-10%
2.03 (1.79 - 2.19, n=3)
3%
1.754 (0.6 - 6.2, n=865)
16%
Idle Maximum *
2.5
2.8
-12%
2.23
11%
2.1
16%
2.38
5%
2.21 (1.88 - 2.5, n=3)
12%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=866)
18%
Load Average *
5.2
3.9
25%
3.6
31%
4.73
9%
4.72
9%
4.83 (3.88 - 5.41, n=3)
7%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=860)
21%
Load Maximum *
7.5
7.2
4%
5.17
31%
5.61
25%
7.68
-2%
7.02 (5.97 - 7.59, n=3)
6%
6.04 (1.2 - 14.2, n=860)
19%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
37h 43min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
19h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 9min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
4h 39min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
Motorola Moto G8
4000 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite
4200 mAh
Gigaset GS290
4700 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
-12%
-11%
-21%
-22%
Reader / Idle
2263
1953
-14%
2154
-5%
1893
-16%
H.264
1269
1048
-17%
1176
-7%
984
-22%
WiFi v1.3
1187
988
-17%
1007
-15%
934
-21%
864
-27%
Load
279
276
-1%
228
-18%
212
-24%

Pro

+ nagyon hosszú üzemidő
+ sokoldalú kamera elhelyezés
+ infravörös port
+ szoftver naprakész az írás idején
+ jó teljesítmény...
+ ..."thermal throttling" nélkül
+ dedikált microSD kártya nyílás
+ gyors töltés

Kontra

- nincs NFC
- alacsony kontrasztú kijelző
- előtelepített bloatware alkalmazások

Összegzés - Sokat Kínál

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Smartphone rövid értékelés. Test unit provided by Trading Shenzhen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Smartphone rövid értékelés. Test unit provided by Trading Shenzhen

A Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S egy élő példa arra, hogy 200 dollárért egy nagyszerű okostelefont kaphatunk 2020-ban, a méretet, a felszereltséget és a csatlakoztatást tekintve egyaránt. Természetesen nem várhatunk csúcskategóriás okostelefonokkal megegyező LTE teljesítményt, Wi-Fi 6-ot vagy NFC-t.

Amit a Redmi Note 9S kínál cserébe, az a rugalmas és sokoldalú kamera elrendezés, több jól használható lencsével. Még egyszer, ne várjunk ugyanolyan szintű fotóminőséget mint amilyenre a sokkal drágább csúcskategóriás mobiltelefonok képesek, de ha csak egy kicsit is csökkentjük az elvárásainkat, az már bőven elegendő lesz, hogy elfogadjuk a kamerát olyannak, amilyen.

Egy gigantikus akkumulátort is kapunk, amely legalábbis részben felelős a Redmi nagy súlyáért, majdnem 20 óra működési idővel a Wi-Fi tesztünkben.

A Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S egy jó kamerát és hosszú üzemidőt kínál alacsony áron.

A világos kijelzőnek kedvezett volna egy nagyobb kontrasztarány. A helymeghatározó szolgáltatások pontossága elegendő volt a mindennapi használatra. Az árához képest a Note 9S összességében meglehetősen erős. Terhelés alatt nem lép fel „thermal throttling” és az Android rendszer is naprakész az írás időpontjában.

Összességében a Redmi Note 9S megérdemli, hogy teljes mértékben ajánlhassuk, mivel nagyszerű funkciói vannak, és mindez alacsony áron.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S - 05/19/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Váz
82%
Billentyűzet
65 / 75 → 87%
Érintőpad
96%
Csatlakoztathatóság
44 / 70 → 63%
Súly
88%
Akkumulátor
92%
Kijelző
85%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
29 / 64 → 46%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
69 / 86 → 80%
Hőmérséklet
88%
Zaj
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
59%
Átlag
75%
81%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Smartphone rövid értékelés - Nagy Kijelző, Alacsony Ár
Florian Schmitt, 2020-07-17 (Update: 2020-07-17)