Notebookcheck

Eurocom Q5 (Clevo P957HR, i7-7700HQ, GTX 1070 Max-Q) Laptop rövid értékelés

Allen Ngo (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 09/05/2017
Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Notebook Windows

Nem optimalizált. A Q5 több konfigurációban és változatosabb konnektivitási lehetőségekkel érhető el, mint a szokványos Max-Q notebookok. Sajnos a hardver és szoftver sem hozza a tőle elvárhatót.

Eurocom Q5
Processzor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Grafikus adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Mag: 1101 MHz, Memória: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 382.05, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, 1300 MHz, 14-14-14-35, Dual Channel
Kijelző
15.6 hüvelyk 16:9, 3840x2160 pixel 282 PPI, ID: LGD04D4, Name: LG Philips LP156UD1-SPB1, IPS, fényes: nem
Alaplap
Intel HM175 (Skylake PCH-H)
Háttértár
Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2, 512 GB 
Csatlakozók
5 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington zár, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm fejhallgató + SPDIF, mikrofon, Kártyaolvasó: SDXC olvasó, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó
Hálózat
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, mini SIM
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 18.6 x 380 x 249
Akkumulátor
60 Wh Lítium-Polimer
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webkamera: 2 MP
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: sztereo, Billentyűzet: chiclet, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, Control Center, Sound Blaster Connect 2, 12 Hónap Garancia
Súly
2.18 kg, Tápegység: 798 g
Ár
2100 USD
Hivatkozások

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0, 2x, mini DisplayPort 1.2, 2x USB 3.1 Type-C (Gen. 1), 2x USB 3.0
Left: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0, 2x, mini DisplayPort 1.2, 2x USB 3.1 Type-C (Gen. 1), 2x USB 3.0
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Right: 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm headset, USB 3.0, SDXC card reader, mini SIM, Gigabit RJ-45, Kensington Lock
Right: 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm headset, USB 3.0, SDXC card reader, mini SIM, Gigabit RJ-45, Kensington Lock
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Alienware 15 R3
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
669 MBit/s ∼98%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
652 MBit/s ∼96% -3%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Alienware 15 R3
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
560 MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
491 MBit/s ∼88%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
456 MBit/s ∼81% -7%
275.6
cd/m²
284.4
cd/m²
300.4
cd/m²
261.5
cd/m²
287.5
cd/m²
275.8
cd/m²
265.8
cd/m²
275.2
cd/m²
285.4
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2
Maximum: 300.4 cd/m² Átlag: 279.1 cd/m² Minimum: 24 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 87 %
Centrumban: 287.5 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 442:1 (Fekete: 0.65 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.6 | - Ø
92.3% sRGB (Argyll) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.39
Eurocom Q5
ID: LGD04D4, Name: LG Philips LP156UD1-SPB1, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
ID: AUO42ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN04.2, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
AUO42ED, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
Samsung 156HL01-104 (SDC324C) , IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Gigabyte P56XT
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Alienware 15 R3
HPJGK_B156HTN (AUO51ED), TN, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
1%
-21%
10%
-1%
41%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
32.4 (16, 16.4)
33.2 (18.4, 14.8)
-2%
43.2 (21.2, 22)
-33%
37.2 (18.4, 18.8)
-15%
25 (12, 13)
23%
Response Time Black / White *
28.8 (18.8, 10)
28 (15.6, 12.4)
3%
31.2 (16.4, 14.8)
-8%
26 (8, 18)
10%
24.8 (14, 10.8)
14%
12 (4, 8)
58%
PWM Frequency
202 (100)
20000 (95)
Screen
29%
37%
24%
10%
-8%
Brightness
279
309
11%
289
4%
279
0%
280
0%
382
37%
Brightness Distribution
87
86
-1%
86
-1%
84
-3%
87
0%
93
7%
Black Level *
0.65
0.35
46%
0.26
60%
0.33
49%
0.32
51%
0.39
40%
Contrast
442
877
98%
1169
164%
888
101%
941
113%
990
124%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
3.4
24%
3.46
23%
3.59
20%
6.21
-38%
10.2
-127%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.6
1.4
70%
2.46
47%
3.86
16%
6.08
-32%
11.28
-145%
Gamma
2.39 100%
2.19 110%
2.38 101%
2.53 95%
2.31 104%
2.23 108%
CCT
7393 88%
6558 99%
6915 94%
7229 90%
7375 88%
11383 57%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
55.6
-6%
59
0%
63
7%
55
-7%
59
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92.3
85
-8%
91
-1%
97
5%
84
-9%
90
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
15% / 24%
8% / 26%
17% / 23%
5% / 8%
17% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 65 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8499 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points ∼95% +25%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
160 Points ∼80% +5%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
152 Points ∼76% 0%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points ∼76%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
150 Points ∼75% -1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼74% -3%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
144 Points ∼72% -5%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
133 Points ∼67% -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
125 Points ∼63% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points ∼42% +22%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
758 Points ∼35% +3%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
738 Points ∼34%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points ∼34% -1%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
721 Points ∼34% -2%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
706 Points ∼33% -4%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points ∼32% -8%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
503 Points ∼23% -32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
490 Points ∼23% -34%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.19 Points ∼96% +27%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.81 Points ∼80% +5%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points ∼80% +5%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.73 Points ∼76%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.69 Points ∼74% -2%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.68 Points ∼74% -3%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.54 Points ∼68% -11%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.51 Points ∼67% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.46 Points ∼64% -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
9.78 Points ∼4% +20%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.34 Points ∼3% +2%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points ∼3%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.06 Points ∼3% -1%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.75 Points ∼3% -5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points ∼3% -8%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
6.89 Points ∼3% -15%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.81 Points ∼2% -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
5.29 Points ∼2% -35%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
7222 Points ∼81% +23%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5877 Points ∼66%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5860 Points ∼66% 0%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
5632 Points ∼63% -4%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5516 Points ∼62% -6%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5484 Points ∼62% -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
4999 Points ∼56% -15%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
4920 Points ∼55% -16%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
28189 Points ∼57% +29%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22243 Points ∼45% +2%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21824 Points ∼44%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
21313 Points ∼43% -2%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
20801 Points ∼42% -5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20283 Points ∼41% -7%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
17618 Points ∼35% -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
14329 Points ∼29% -34%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
323 s * ∼4% -43%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
225.617 s * ∼3%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
224.726 s * ∼3% -0%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
211.05 s * ∼2% +6%
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
205.34 s * ∼2% +9%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
176.329 s * ∼2% +22%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Gigabyte P55 V4
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
593.228 Seconds * ∼3% -6%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
572.296 Seconds * ∼3% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
569.349 Seconds * ∼3% -1%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
561.342 Seconds * ∼2%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
539.478 Seconds * ∼2% +4%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
440.036 Seconds * ∼2% +22%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
11810
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
21824
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5877
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.14 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
64.51 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.73 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
152 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
97.58 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
738 Points
Segítség
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
6515 Points ∼100% +33%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
5358 Points ∼82% +10%
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
4891 Points ∼75%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4859 Points ∼75% -1%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
8593 Points ∼92% +74%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
7653 Points ∼82% +55%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5171 Points ∼56% +5%
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
4926 Points ∼53%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Tornado F5
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
5476 Points ∼92% +43%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
5009 Points ∼84% +31%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4060 Points ∼68% +6%
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
3829 Points ∼64%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3829 pontok
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4926 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4891 pontok
Segítség
Eurocom Q5
Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Eurocom Tornado F5
Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
Alienware 17 R4
SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
AS SSD
-5%
-22%
17%
-53%
Copy Game MB/s
682.33
718.5
5%
1033.53
51%
1310.15
92%
573.6
-16%
Copy Program MB/s
301.53
383.33
27%
469.95
56%
634.94
111%
446.13
48%
Copy ISO MB/s
1967.04
1794.95
-9%
1336.93
-32%
1614.11
-18%
1227.03
-38%
Score Total
4001
3995
0%
2328
-42%
3943
-1%
2072
-48%
Score Write
1705
1293
-24%
487
-71%
1689
-1%
858
-50%
Score Read
1529
1818
19%
1238
-19%
1512
-1%
831
-46%
Access Time Write *
0.028
0.032
-14%
0.033
-18%
0.024
14%
0.123
-339%
Access Time Read *
0.036
0.047
-31%
0.049
-36%
0.03
17%
0.042
-17%
4K-64 Write
1366.04
1034.83
-24%
260.86
-81%
1333.91
-2%
671.01
-51%
4K-64 Read
1230.69
1526.85
24%
998.94
-19%
1178.67
-4%
620.48
-50%
4K Write
136.19
117.29
-14%
112.06
-18%
150.46
10%
113.36
-17%
4K Read
49.3
50.15
2%
45.64
-7%
50.96
3%
35.61
-28%
Seq Write
2029.39
1409.1
-31%
1144.4
-44%
2046.28
1%
734.8
-64%
Seq Read
2493.24
2412.19
-3%
1933.89
-22%
2819.05
13%
1752.03
-30%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
CDM 5 Read Seq Q32T1: 3381 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq Q32T1: 2075 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K Q32T1: 574.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K Q32T1: 498.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2763 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2073 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K: 57.19 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K: 202.6 MB/s
3DMark
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
4137 Points ∼41% +27%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
3662 Points ∼36% +12%
Eurocom Q5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
3262 Points ∼32%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
2893 Points ∼29% -11%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
1810 Points ∼18% -45%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ
1140 Points ∼11% -65%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
21366 Points ∼53% +47%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
18498 Points ∼46% +27%
Gigabyte P56XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
16410 Points ∼40% +13%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
16165 Points ∼40% +11%
Eurocom Q5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
14557 Points ∼36%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
12984 Points ∼32% -11%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
10349 Points ∼25% -29%
Eurocom P5 Pro Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 4790K
9358 Points ∼23% -36%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
7866 Points ∼19% -46%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ
5895 Points ∼15% -60%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
11160 Points ∼63% +20%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
9878 Points ∼56% +6%
Eurocom P5 Pro Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 4790K
9761 Points ∼56% +5%
Eurocom Q5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
9319 Points ∼53%
Gigabyte P56XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
9079 Points ∼52% -3%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
9065 Points ∼52% -3%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
8762 Points ∼50% -6%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
8652 Points ∼49% -7%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
7163 Points ∼41% -23%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ
5562 Points ∼32% -40%
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
29109 Points ∼57% +56%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
23314 Points ∼46% +25%
Gigabyte P56XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
20576 Points ∼40% +10%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
20240 Points ∼40% +8%
Eurocom Q5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
18684 Points ∼37%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
17401 Points ∼34% -7%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
13279 Points ∼26% -29%
Eurocom P5 Pro Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 4790K
11209 Points ∼22% -40%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
9394 Points ∼18% -50%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ
7982 Points ∼16% -57%
3DMark 11 Performance
14947 pontok
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
25659 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score
12028 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
6354 pontok
Segítség
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
118 fps ∼100% +48%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
105 fps ∼89% +32%
MSI Gaming Z GeForce GTX 1070 OC Bios Desktop PC
GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
102 (min: 95) fps ∼86% +28%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
85.9 fps ∼73% +8%
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
79.7 fps ∼68%
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS128G39MNC-3510A
68.8 fps ∼58% -14%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
55 fps ∼47% -31%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
51.1 fps ∼43% -36%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
42.8 fps ∼36% -46%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
164.7 fps ∼100% +26%
MSI Gaming Z GeForce GTX 1070 OC Bios Desktop PC
GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
157 fps ∼95% +20%
Aorus X7 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
145.8 fps ∼89% +12%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
131.6 fps ∼80% +1%
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
130.5 fps ∼79%
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS128G39MNC-3510A
105.6 fps ∼64% -19%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
86.4 fps ∼52% -34%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
69.5 fps ∼42% -47%
Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
124 fps ∼100% +40%
MSI Gaming Z GeForce GTX 1070 OC Bios Desktop PC
GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
113 (min: 92) fps ∼91% +28%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
95.3 fps ∼77% +8%
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
88.4 fps ∼71%
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS128G39MNC-3510A
71.5 fps ∼58% -19%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
57.9 fps ∼47% -35%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
43.5 fps ∼35% -51%
alacsony közepes magas ultra4K
Guild Wars 2 (2012) 62.2fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 130.5fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 96.5fps
Thief (2014) 95.1fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 46fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 7337fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 6059fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 88.434.3fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 79.733.6fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 6765.2fps
Overwatch (2016) 136.270.1fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 51.620.6fps
Prey (2017) 138.748.1fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 71.840.5fps
F1 2017 (2017) 8036fps
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra

Zajszint

Üresjárat
31.5 / 33.8 / 33.8 dB(A)
Terhelés
41.7 / 54.2 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
csendes
40 dB(A)
hallható
50 dB(A)
hangos
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm távolságról)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256
Alienware 15 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Noise
9%
-4%
-5%
4%
1%
off / environment *
29
28.5
2%
30
-3%
30
-3%
28
3%
30
-3%
Idle Minimum *
31.5
28.5
10%
34
-8%
31
2%
31.9
-1%
30
5%
Idle Average *
33.8
28.5
16%
35
-4%
32
5%
32
5%
33
2%
Idle Maximum *
33.8
30.1
11%
39
-15%
42
-24%
32
5%
37
-9%
Load Average *
41.7
35.2
16%
39
6%
49
-18%
36.5
12%
41
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
41.7
41.7
-0%
48
-15%
40.3
3%
42
-1%
Load Maximum *
54.2
48.8
10%
49
10%
50
8%
53.4
1%
50
8%

* ... smaller is better

Max. terhelés
 48.8 °C56.2 °C47.2 °C 
 48 °C48.6 °C38.2 °C 
 38.6 °C37.2 °C31.4 °C 
Maximum: 56.2 °C
Átlag: 43.8 °C
57 °C61.2 °C52.2 °C
34.6 °C53 °C48.2 °C
31 °C37.4 °C37.8 °C
Maximum: 61.2 °C
Átlag: 45.8 °C
Tápegység (max.)  46.6 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 22.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.838.72534.835.53135.534.44034.135.3503231.36332.135.28030.831.210030.230.812528.730.216029.329.420028.929.825028.330.231527.434.240026.442.150026.145.26302652.580025.655.6100025.360.5125027.361.7160025.160.120002461.5250023.960315023.956.5400023.754.8500023.657630023.655.6800023.654.91000023.655.61250023.652.71600023.647.3SPL3770.2N2.824.1median 25.3Eurocom Q5median 54.8Delta2.3835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Eurocom Q5 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (61.65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.27 / 0.94 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 9 / 13.5 / 13.7 Watt
Terhelés midlight 87.8 / 158.6 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Eurocom Q5
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus GX501
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
EVGA SC15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte P56XT
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), LiteOn CX2-8B256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-37%
-54%
-61%
-30%
-43%
Idle Minimum *
9
19.1
-112%
18
-100%
25.8
-187%
13
-44%
18
-100%
Idle Average *
13.5
20.8
-54%
23
-70%
26.6
-97%
17
-26%
23
-70%
Idle Maximum *
13.7
21.8
-59%
31
-126%
26.7
-95%
22
-61%
30
-119%
Load Average *
87.8
73.7
16%
79
10%
80.3
9%
85
3%
85
3%
Load Maximum *
158.6
173.1
-9%
196
-24%
159.3
-0%
208
-31%
158
-0%
Witcher 3 ultra *
129
130.2
-1%
148
-15%
121.2
6%
154
-19%
96
26%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
7h 46min
WiFi böngészés v1.3
4h 18min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
0h 47min
Eurocom Q5
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 60 Wh
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Gigabyte P56XT
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 91.2 Wh
EVGA SC15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 62 Wh
Alienware 15 R3
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 99 Wh
Battery Runtime
-30%
1%
75%
-5%
34%
Reader / Idle
466
229
-51%
256
-45%
568
22%
222
-52%
382
-18%
WiFi v1.3
258
147
-43%
198
-23%
384
49%
167
-35%
264
2%
Load
47
49
4%
80
70%
120
155%
81
72%
102
117%

Pro

+ jó üzemidő; Optimus is
+ széles portválaszték; opcionális mini SIM
+ könnyen hozzáférhető belső
+ vékony és vonzó design
+ alacsony kezdőár
+ 2x tárhelyöböl

Kontra

- lassabb GTX 1070 Max-Q, mint a Zephyrus-ban; alacsonyabb GPU órajel
- nem képes tartósan fenntartani a maximális CPU Turbo Boost-ot
- az automatikus ventilátor vezérlést nem optimalizálták az Nvidia Max-Q-hoz
- terhelés alatt nagyon melegszik
- gyengébb kontraszt az RGBW subpixel array miatt
- kötelező Optimus; nincs G-Sync változat
- kicsit nyekergő ház
- nincs billentyűnkénti RGB megvilágításos változat
- nincs Thunderbolt 3
In review: Eurocom Q5. Test model provided by Eurocom
In review: Eurocom Q5. Test model provided by Eurocom

Ránézésre a Q5 majdnem mindent tud, amit egy Max-Q gaming notebooktól elvárnánk. Könnyű szervizelhetőség, karcsú és vonzó külső, többféle választható kijelző, két belső tárhelyöböl, bőséges csatlakozókínálat, Optimus és még SIM támogatás is. Kicsit alaposabban megvizsgálva azonban rájövünk, hogy a rendszer messze van az olyan Max-Q modellektől, mint a Zephyrus-ok.

Először is, a jelenlegi automatikus ventilátor beállításokon változtatni kellene, hogy megfeleljenek a Max-Q ventilátorzaj normáinak. Most ugyanis a felhasználónak manuálisan kell kb. 55%-ra állítania a ventilátor sebességét a "teljes" Max-Q élményért. Ellenkező esetben a Q5 pont ugyanolyan hangos, mint egy nem Max-Q gaming notebook, amelyet GTX 1070/erősebb videokártyával láttak el. Akkor meg miért is vegyünk egy Max-Q notebookot, ha nem nyújt csendesebb, erősebb ultravékony alternatívát másokkal szemben?

Másodszor, a magi hőmérsékletek melegebbek, mint a Zephyrus, amennyiben az 55 százalékos ventilátor beállítást használjuk. Tehát, amikor azonos játékterhelésnek tesszük ki, azonos zajszintre korlátozva, az Asus notebook hűvösebb marad.

Végül, a GTX 1070 Max-Q a Q5-ben következetesen lassabb, mint ugyanez a GPU az Asus gépében. Lassabb órajele, és magasabb maghőmérséklete miatt el is vághatja magát sok hardcore gamer szemében. Amennyiben a legjobb GTX 1070 Max-Q gépre vágyik valaki, úgy ne Q5 mellett tegye le a voksát. Amennyiben a kiegészítő funkciók és csatlakozási lehetőségek széles tárháza előnyt élvez a fapados Zephyrus képességeivel szemben, úgy a Q5 alacsonyabb árával még mindig vonzó Max-Q notebook lehet.

Egyértelmű, hogy a Q5 és hűtése még nincs teljesen  Max-Q -ra optimalizálva, hiszen az órajelei és hőmérséklete miatt rosszabbul teljesít a riválisoknál. A jövő konfigjai - kevésbé terhelő GTX 1060 Max-Q -val - elméletileg jobban illenek majd ehhez a házhoz. Ezen felül, a CPU-n és GPU-n túli kiegészítő funkciók és konfigurációk széles választéka a jelenlegi legnagyobb a szupervékony Max-Q notebookok között.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Eurocom Q5 - 09/07/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Váz
79 / 98 → 81%
Billentyűzet
81%
Érintőpad
89%
Csatlakoztathatóság
67 / 81 → 82%
Súly
62 / 66 → 93%
Akkumulátor
77%
Kijelző
84%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
94%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
93%
Hőmérséklet
78 / 95 → 82%
Zaj
70 / 90 → 78%
Audio
40%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Átlag
74%
83%
Gaming - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Eurocom Q5 (Clevo P957HR, i7-7700HQ, GTX 1070 Max-Q) Laptop rövid értékelés
Allen Ngo, 2017-09- 5 (Update: 2017-09- 5)