Notebookcheck

EVGA SC15 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1060) Laptop rövid értékelés

Allen Ngo (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 07/07/2017
Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Windows Notebook

A legjobb GTX 1060-as laptop... illetve majdnem. "Vékony és könnyű" a "könnyű" nélkül. Az SC15 nehéz, de nem nagydarab, és gyors, de nem zajos. Majdnem mindent tud, amit egy 2000 dollár alatti prémium gaming laptoptól elvárunk.

EVGA SC15 (SC Széria)
Processzor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Grafikus adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Mag: 1455 MHz, Memória: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 381.99
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4, 1300 MHz, Dual-Channel, 16-16-16-39
Kijelző
15.6 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, ID: AUO42ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN04.2, fényes: nem
Alaplap
Intel HM175
Háttértár
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, 256 GB 
, Másodlagos: 1 TB Seagate ST1000LM048 HDD
Hangkártya
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Csatlakozók
4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington zár, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm fejhallgató, 3.5 mm mikrofon, Brightness Sensor
Hálózat
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 22.55 x 387 x 260
Akkumulátor
62 Wh Lítium-Polimer
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webkamera: FHD
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: sztereo, Billentyűzet: chiclet, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, Torq X10 egér, bőr egérpad, USB-C/USB-A adapter, felhasználói kézikönyv, EVGA PrecisionX Mobile, 24 Hónap Garancia
Súly
2.93 kg, Tápegység: 794 g
Ár
1900 USD
Hivatkozások

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: USB 3.0, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0b, mDP 1.4, Gigabit Ethernet, AC adapter, Kensington Lock
Right: USB 3.0, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0b, mDP 1.4, Gigabit Ethernet, AC adapter, Kensington Lock
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: 3.5 mm audio, 3.5 mm microphone, 2x USB 3.0
Left: 3.5 mm audio, 3.5 mm microphone, 2x USB 3.0
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
EVGA SC15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
657 MBit/s ∼99%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
648 MBit/s ∼98% -1%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
594 MBit/s ∼100% +65%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
529 MBit/s ∼89% +47%
EVGA SC15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
361 MBit/s ∼61%
249.9
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
270.7
cd/m²
233.1
cd/m²
281.5
cd/m²
272.9
cd/m²
205.5
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
235.7
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Maximum: 281.5 cd/m² Átlag: 253.5 cd/m² Minimum: 1.93 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 73 %
Centrumban: 281.5 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1043:1 (Fekete: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.9 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | - Ø
89.3% sRGB (Argyll) 57.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.27
EVGA SC15
ID: AUO42ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN04.2, , 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus GX501
AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
APPA031, IPS, 15.4, 2880x1800
Gigabyte Aero 15
N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Aorus X5 v6
IPS, 15.6, 2880x1620
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
Response Times
13%
-13%
-4%
7%
28%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41.6 (21.6, 20)
40.4 (23.2, 17.2)
3%
48 (23.6, 24.4)
-15%
42.8 (23.6, 19.2)
-3%
34 (19, 25)
18%
28 (15.6, 12.4)
33%
Response Time Black / White *
30.8 (17.6, 13.2)
24 (11.6, 12.4)
22%
33.8 (19.6, 14.2)
-10%
32 (18.8, 13.2)
-4%
32 (8, 24)
-4%
23.6 (15.2, 8.4)
23%
PWM Frequency
119000 (80, 210)
26000 (20)
198.4
1351 (39)
Screen
-6%
32%
-9%
-4%
-45%
Brightness
253
305
21%
523
107%
316
25%
271
7%
263
4%
Brightness Distribution
73
83
14%
86
18%
90
23%
83
14%
92
26%
Black Level *
0.27
0.25
7%
0.44
-63%
0.36
-33%
0.249
8%
0.44
-63%
Contrast
1043
1312
26%
1239
19%
889
-15%
1126
8%
623
-40%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.9
6.02
-54%
1.6
59%
4.62
-18%
4.94
-27%
8
-105%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.8
6.32
-66%
1.9
50%
6
-58%
5.13
-35%
9.1
-139%
Gamma
2.27 106%
2.28 105%
2.26 106%
2.46 98%
2.26 106%
2.24 107%
CCT
7322 89%
8194 79%
6834 95%
6761 96%
7433 87%
5020 129%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57.8
60
4%
60
4%
55.9
-3%
45.7
-21%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89.3
92
3%
92
3%
85.9
-4%
72.1
-19%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / -2%
10% / 21%
-7% / -8%
2% / -2%
-9% / -30%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.6 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points ∼95% +19%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼80%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
156 Points ∼78% -2%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
155 Points ∼78% -3%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
152 Points ∼76% -5%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
143 Points ∼72% -11%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
141 Points ∼71% -12%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼70% -12%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
131 Points ∼66% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points ∼42% +22%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
772 Points ∼36% +5%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
738 Points ∼34% 0%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points ∼34%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
706 Points ∼33% -4%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
682 Points ∼32% -7%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points ∼31% -8%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
566 Points ∼26% -23%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
515 Points ∼24% -30%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.19 Points ∼96% +27%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.84 Points ∼81% +6%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼81% +6%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.73 Points ∼76%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.68 Points ∼74% -3%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.66 Points ∼73% -4%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.55 Points ∼68% -10%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.49 Points ∼66% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
9.78 Points ∼4% +20%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.44 Points ∼4% +3%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.18 Points ∼3%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.17 Points ∼3% 0%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.75 Points ∼3% -5%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.53 Points ∼3% -8%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.39 Points ∼3% -10%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
6.02 Points ∼3% -26%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
7222 Points ∼81% +19%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
6182 Points ∼70% +2%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6051 Points ∼68%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5954 Points ∼67% -2%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
5632 Points ∼63% -7%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5525 Points ∼62% -9%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5449 Points ∼61% -10%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4720 Points ∼53% -22%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
28189 Points ∼57% +28%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
23041 Points ∼46% +5%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22512 Points ∼45% +2%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22041 Points ∼44%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
21313 Points ∼43% -3%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
19720 Points ∼40% -11%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
18785 Points ∼38% -15%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
18296 Points ∼37% -17%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
224.726 s * ∼3% -6%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
213.193 s * ∼3% -0%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
212.46 s * ∼3%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
211.321 s * ∼2% +1%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
210.067 s * ∼2% +1%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
176.329 s * ∼2% +17%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
572.296 Seconds * ∼3% -6%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
561.953 Seconds * ∼2% -4%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
540.619 Seconds * ∼2%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
535.159 Seconds * ∼2% +1%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
519.371 Seconds * ∼2% +4%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
440.036 Seconds * ∼2% +19%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
11054
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22041
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6051
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
71.25 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.18 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.73 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
117.23 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
736 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
160 Points
Segítség
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
5400 Points ∼83%
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
5053 Points ∼78% -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Radeon Pro 555, 7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
4648 Points ∼71% -14%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
7973 Points ∼86% +6%
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
7505 Points ∼81%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Radeon Pro 555, 7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
4914 Points ∼53% -35%
Home Score Accelerated v2
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
5085 Points ∼85%
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4828 Points ∼81% -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Radeon Pro 555, 7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
4054 Points ∼68% -20%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5085 pontok
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7505 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5400 pontok
Segítség
EVGA SC15
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Aorus X5 v6
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
Aorus X7 DT v6
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
AS SSD
37%
-56%
9%
17%
Copy Game MB/s
977.48
1081.99
11%
1072.6
10%
539.5
-45%
1134
16%
Copy Program MB/s
442.3
401.94
-9%
351.48
-21%
411.54
-7%
502
13%
Copy ISO MB/s
1070.79
1666.02
56%
351.13
-67%
1272.4
19%
1482
38%
Score Total
2474
3756
52%
1630
-34%
2810
14%
2695
9%
Score Write
896
1468
64%
514
-43%
1022
14%
665
-26%
Score Read
1081
1549
43%
756
-30%
1206
12%
1353
25%
Access Time Write *
0.035
0.029
17%
0.025
29%
0.034
3%
0.025
29%
Access Time Read *
0.054
0.041
24%
0.367
-580%
0.034
37%
0.047
13%
4K-64 Write
705.92
1185.25
68%
272.53
-61%
788.85
12%
366.91
-48%
4K-64 Read
821.51
1228.73
50%
521.36
-37%
961.61
17%
1106.67
35%
4K Write
95.46
127.63
34%
131.32
38%
112.15
17%
149.13
56%
4K Read
39.13
48.01
23%
44.6
14%
41.34
6%
48.93
25%
Seq Write
942.8
1550.23
64%
1098.57
17%
1206.58
28%
1493.99
58%
Seq Read
2203.33
2719.21
23%
1904.01
-14%
2026.09
-8%
1971.14
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Sequential Read: 2203.33 MB/s
Sequential Write: 942.8 MB/s
4K Read: 39.13 MB/s
4K Write: 95.46 MB/s
4K-64 Read: 821.51 MB/s
4K-64 Write: 705.92 MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.054 ms
Access Time Write: 0.035 ms
Copy ISO: 1070.79 MB/s
Copy Program: 442.3 MB/s
Copy Game: 977.48 MB/s
Score Read: 1081 Points
Score Write: 896 Points
Score Total: 2474 Points
3DMark
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
5120 Points ∼51% +99%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
4206 Points ∼42% +64%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
4048 Points ∼40% +57%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
2893 Points ∼29% +13%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
2571 Points ∼25%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
739 Points ∼7% -71%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
10382 Points ∼63% +91%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
8626 Points ∼53% +59%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
5441 Points ∼33%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
3517 Points ∼21% -35%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
2629 Points ∼16% -52%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
1988 Points ∼12% -63%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
21781 Points ∼54% +90%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
18373 Points ∼45% +60%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
18219 Points ∼45% +59%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
12984 Points ∼32% +13%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11453 Points ∼28%
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11134 Points ∼27% -3%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7321 Points ∼18% -36%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
6002 Points ∼15% -48%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4133 Points ∼10% -64%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
11160 Points ∼63% +26%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
10419 Points ∼59% +17%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
10081 Points ∼57% +14%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
8935 Points ∼51% +1%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
8876 Points ∼51%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7952 Points ∼45% -10%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7371 Points ∼42% -17%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4466 Points ∼25% -50%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
28321 Points ∼56% +83%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
23540 Points ∼46% +52%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
23170 Points ∼45% +50%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
17401 Points ∼34% +13%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
15453 Points ∼30%
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
14233 Points ∼28% -8%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
9824 Points ∼19% -36%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7537 Points ∼15% -51%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4826 Points ∼9% -69%
3DMark 11 Performance
13148 pontok
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
110194 pontok
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
24201 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9750 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
5165 pontok
Segítség
alacsony közepes magas ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 110fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 82.7fps
Thief (2014) 79fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 6639.6fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 8962fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 60fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 117.9fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 70.8fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 66.8fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 63.759.2fps
Doom (2016) 98.4fps
Overwatch (2016) 103.9fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 41fps
Prey (2017) 110.3fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
96.4 fps ∼100% +44%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
66.9 fps ∼69% 0%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
66.5 fps ∼69% 0%
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
66.8 fps ∼69%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
65 fps ∼67% -3%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
54.7 fps ∼57% -18%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
42.8 fps ∼44% -36%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
32.5 fps ∼34% -51%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
24.2 fps ∼25% -64%
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra

Zajszint

Üresjárat
31.9 / 32 / 32 dB(A)
Terhelés
36.5 / 53.4 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
csendes
40 dB(A)
hallható
50 dB(A)
hangos
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm távolságról)   environment noise: 28 dB(A)
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Radeon Pro 555, 7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Gigabyte Aero 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Noise
-2%
1%
-3%
-4%
-14%
off / environment *
28
31
-11%
30.9
-10%
28.8
-3%
31
-11%
29.3
-5%
Idle Minimum *
31.9
32
-0%
31.3
2%
33.1
-4%
32
-0%
33.4
-5%
Idle Average *
32
33
-3%
31.3
2%
33.1
-3%
33
-3%
35.2
-10%
Idle Maximum *
32
34
-6%
31.7
1%
34
-6%
34
-6%
35.2
-10%
Load Average *
36.5
39
-7%
39.7
-9%
37.2
-2%
39
-7%
53.3
-46%
Witcher 3 ultra *
40.3
42
-4%
35.5
12%
46.1
-14%
43
-7%
Load Maximum *
53.4
46
14%
48.6
9%
47.1
12%
50
6%
57.6
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Max. terhelés
 33.2 °C49.2 °C35 °C 
 34.2 °C39.8 °C32 °C 
 28.4 °C26.2 °C29.8 °C 
Maximum: 49.2 °C
Átlag: 34.2 °C
32.4 °C45.2 °C37 °C
35 °C39.4 °C35.8 °C
31.8 °C33 °C31.6 °C
Maximum: 45.2 °C
Átlag: 35.7 °C
Tápegység (max.)  44 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.2442537.338.13134.836.14033.533.65034.533.2633433.98032.932.310031.731.512530.530.816030.935.820029.334.725028.535.931527.338.64002741.750026.845.563025.152.180026.660.1100025.961.2125024.459.5160024.256.8200023.753.7250023.552.5315023.551.5400023.548.5500023.250.3630023.253.3800023.256.11000023.154.1125002347.9160002341.6SPL36.667.5N2.821median 24.4EVGA SC15median 50.3Delta2.56.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
EVGA SC15 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (61.19 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.43 / 0.68 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 25.8 / 26.6 / 26.7 Watt
Terhelés midlight 80.3 / 159.3 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
EVGA SC15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus GX501
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
7700HQ, Radeon Pro 555, Apple SSD SM0256L, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4
Gigabyte Aero 15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 2880x1620, 15.6
Power Consumption
-3%
46%
21%
-33%
Idle Minimum *
25.8
18
30%
3.4
87%
12
53%
25
3%
Idle Average *
26.6
23
14%
13.9
48%
15
44%
28.9
-9%
Idle Maximum *
26.7
31
-16%
17.6
34%
20
25%
30.1
-13%
Load Average *
80.3
79
2%
71.1
11%
82
-2%
167.3
-108%
Load Maximum *
159.3
196
-23%
88.5
44%
161
-1%
222.6
-40%
Witcher 3 ultra *
121.2
148
-22%
57.9
52%
111
8%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
3h 42min
WiFi böngészés v1.3
2h 47min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
1h 21min
EVGA SC15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 62 Wh
Asus Zephyrus GX501
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 50 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
7700HQ, Radeon Pro 555, 76 Wh
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 65 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Battery Runtime
-28%
130%
35%
126%
15%
Reader / Idle
222
188
-15%
386
74%
638
187%
249
12%
WiFi v1.3
167
130
-22%
644
286%
232
39%
422
153%
182
9%
Load
81
44
-46%
60
-26%
75
-7%
112
38%
100
23%
Witcher 3 ultra
87

Pro

+ nagyon erős ház, strapabíró alu keret; remek szerelési minőség
+ kitűnő kontraszt és színlefedettség; >90 százalék sRGB
+ egyszerűen használható és sokoldalú PrecisionX Mobile szoftver
+ játék közben is elfogadható maghőmérsékletek
+ nem olyan zajos, mint a többi vékony gaming notebook
+ viszonylag jól hozzáférhető 2.5 inches SATA III öböl
+ Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0b, mDP 1.4
+ 120 Hz G-Sync kijelző alapértelmezettként
+ 2 év jótállás
+ nincs CPU vagy GPU lefojtás
+ stabil fedél és zsanérok

Kontra

- korlátozott kijelzőválaszték; nincs 5 ms válaszidejű, 4K UHD, vagy érintőkijelző
- gyenge hangszórók; gyatra mélyhangok és nem optimális hangszóró pozicionálás
- SODIMM, M.2, WLAN modulokhoz csak plusz szerelés után lehet hozzáférni
- átlagos válaszidejű kijelző; szemcsés matt panel
- nem egyedileg megvilágított RGB billentyűk; korlátozott testreszabhatóság
- szokványos audio kimenet; nincs ESS Sabre DAC
- alapjáraton sokat fogyaszt
- kis funkció és nyíl billentyűk
- egyenetlen clickpad visszajelzés
- nagyon sekély billentyűút
- nehéz és drága
- rövid üzemidő
In review: EVGA SC15 GTX 1060. Test model provided by EVGA
In review: EVGA SC15 GTX 1060. Test model provided by EVGA

Az SC15 majdnem mindent tud, amit egy kiegyensúlyozott GTX 1060-as gaming notebooktól elvárunk. A ház nagyon jó minőségű, a ventilátorok nem visítanak, a CPU teljesítménye egyenletes, és alapértelmezettként G-Sync képes és 120 Hz-es kijelzőt kapunk vele. Aki a GS63VR, Omen 15, Gigabyte P55, Asus GL552/FX502, Aorus X5, vagy más 15 inches gaming notebook felé tekintgetett, az vessen egy pillantást az EVGA-ra is, mert nem csak strapabíróbb, de általában csendesebb és hűvösebb náluk. Amennyiben a tartósság, zaj és hőmérséklet a fő szempontok, nem igazán van jobb vékony noteszgép.

Az SC15-öt csak pár komolyabb hiányossága akadályozza meg abban, hogy a 15 inches GTX 1060-as gaming notebook lehessen. Talán a legnagyobb hátránya, hogy semmilyen más kijelző opciót nem kínál. Míg az MSI és az Aorus 5 és 3 ms válaszidejű paneleket is árul, amelyek drámaian csökkentik a kijelző szellemképességét az EVGA 18 ms-osával szemben (fekete-fehér). A 120 Hz-es frissítés jól jön, de előnyei elhalványulnak a lassú válaszidő miatt, és amiatt, hogy erősebb GPU kellene a magas fps-érték fenntartásához. Egy képzeletbeli 120 Hz/5 ms konfig, akár TN panellel is, igazán hiányzik SC15 kínálatából.

A kijelzővel kapcsolatos panaszaink nem érnek véget itt, mivel a keret nélküli matt panel elég vastag. Míg ez erősebb, stabilabb fedelet jelent, a kijelző által megjelenített kép szemcsésebb lesz.

Van még néhány apróbb hiba, amelyek azért növelik a listát. A gyenge hangszórók, az SD olvasó hiánya, rövid üzemidő, nagy alapjárati fogyasztás és a nagy tömeg zavarhat egyeseket. Az Apple notebookokhoz hasonlóan a borsos ár itt sem feltétlenül a funkcióknak szól, sokkal inkább a kiváló szerelési minőségnek.

Az SC15 strapabíróbb, csendesebb és hűvösebb, mint bármelyik jelenleg kapható, hasonló felszerelésű és méretű gaming notebook. A kijelző magas válaszideje és a konfigurációk kis mennyisége lerontja az amúgy kiváló összképet.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

EVGA SC15 - 07/05/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Váz
92 / 98 → 94%
Billentyűzet
84%
Érintőpad
81%
Csatlakoztathatóság
66 / 81 → 81%
Súly
57 / 66 → 84%
Akkumulátor
68%
Kijelző
85%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
92%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
96%
Hőmérséklet
88 / 95 → 93%
Zaj
80 / 90 → 89%
Audio
50%
Camera
47 / 85 → 56%
Átlag
76%
85%
Gaming - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > EVGA SC15 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1060) Laptop rövid értékelés
Allen Ngo, 2017-07- 7 (Update: 2017-07- 7)