Notebookcheck

HP Pavilion 15 Power (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1050) Laptop rövid értékelés

Allen Ngo (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 07/05/2017
Gaming Kaby Lake Windows Notebook

Power play. A HP a Pavilion széria határait feszegeti, azt tesztelve, hogy milyen erős lehet anélkül, hogy a gaming gépek közé sorolnák. A Pavilion 15 Power a sorozat eddigi legjobb, és valószínűleg legdrágább darabja.

HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV (Pavilion 15 Széria)
Processzor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Grafikus adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) - 2048 MB, Mag: 1354 MHz, Memória: 7008 MHz, GDDR5, 382.53, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4, 1300 MHz, Dual-Channel, 15-15-15-36
Kijelző
15.6 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, ID: AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, fényes: nem
Alaplap
Intel HM175
Háttértár
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, 256 GB 
, másodlagos: 1 TB HGST HTS721010A9E630
Hangkártya
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Csatlakozók
4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington zár, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm kombinált, Kártyaolvasó: SD olvasó
Hálózat
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 24.1 x 378 x 252.2
Akkumulátor
70 Wh Lítium-Polimer
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webkamera: HD
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: B&O sztereo, Billentyűzet: chiclet, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, HP CoolSense, 3D DriveGuard, B&O Play Audio Control, 12 Hónap Garancia
Súly
2.358 kg, Tápegység: 431 g
Ár
1000 USD
Hivatkozások

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Left: 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm combo audio, Kensington Lock
Left: 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm combo audio, Kensington Lock
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Right: SD reader, USB Type-C Gen. 1, USB 3.0, HDMI-out, Gigabit Ethernet, AC adapter
Right: SD reader, USB Type-C Gen. 1, USB 3.0, HDMI-out, Gigabit Ethernet, AC adapter
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
645 MBit/s ∼97%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
343 MBit/s ∼52% -47%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
512 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
465 MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
341 MBit/s ∼67% -27%
238.2
cd/m²
228.5
cd/m²
219.5
cd/m²
240.8
cd/m²
256.6
cd/m²
226.5
cd/m²
249.3
cd/m²
270.5
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Maximum: 270.5 cd/m² Átlag: 242.5 cd/m² Minimum: 17.58 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 81 %
Centrumban: 256.6 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1351:1 (Fekete: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | - Ø
57.7% sRGB (Argyll) 36.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.32
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
ID: AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
Chi Mei CMN N156HCE-EN1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
BOE CQ NV156HFM-N42, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
15%
-41%
-20%
-10%
-6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38.8 (20, 18.8)
29.6 (15.6, 14)
24%
58.8 (33.6, 25.2)
-52%
46 (25, 21)
-19%
38.8 (20.8, 18)
-0%
44.4 (15.2, 29.2)
-14%
Response Time Black / White *
28 (16.4, 11.6)
26.4 (15.6, 10.8)
6%
36 (23.6, 12.4)
-29%
34 (20, 14)
-21%
33.6 (18.8, 14.8)
-20%
27.2 (6.8, 20.4)
3%
PWM Frequency
25510 (69)
21550 (99)
20000 (90)
19230 (99)
Screen
-6%
-33%
-5%
-35%
-33%
Brightness
243
285
17%
244
0%
268
10%
249
2%
193
-21%
Brightness Distribution
81
92
14%
88
9%
91
12%
90
11%
75
-7%
Black Level *
0.19
0.24
-26%
0.35
-84%
0.26
-37%
0.48
-153%
0.19
-0%
Contrast
1351
1254
-7%
683
-49%
1065
-21%
533
-61%
1104
-18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5
5
-0%
7.3
-46%
5.05
-1%
5.9
-18%
7.8
-56%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
7
-159%
4.9
-81%
2.97
-10%
5.6
-107%
7.3
-170%
Gamma
2.32 103%
2.34 103%
2.19 110%
2.39 100%
2.21 109%
2.39 100%
CCT
6599 98%
6578 99%
7332 89%
6466 101%
7250 90%
5771 113%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36.7
59
61%
35
-5%
38
4%
44.8
22%
39.3
7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57.7
90
56%
55
-5%
59
2%
70.1
21%
56.5
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
5% / -1%
-37% / -34%
-13% / -8%
-23% / -30%
-20% / -28%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points ∼95% +26%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼81% +7%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼76%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
143 Points ∼72% -5%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼67% -11%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
133 Points ∼67% -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
125 Points ∼63% -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points ∼42% +21%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼35% 0%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
740 Points ∼34%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
682 Points ∼32% -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼32% -8%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
503 Points ∼23% -32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
490 Points ∼23% -34%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.19 Points ∼96% +19%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.84 Points ∼81%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼81% -1%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.66 Points ∼73% -10%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.51 Points ∼67% -18%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points ∼66% -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.46 Points ∼64% -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
9.78 Points ∼4% +20%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.19 Points ∼3% 0%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points ∼3%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.53 Points ∼3% -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points ∼3% -8%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.81 Points ∼2% -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
5.29 Points ∼2% -35%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
7222 Points ∼81% +22%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5933 Points ∼67%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5923 Points ∼67% 0%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5449 Points ∼61% -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5126 Points ∼58% -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
4999 Points ∼56% -16%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
4920 Points ∼55% -17%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
28189 Points ∼57% +28%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22434 Points ∼45% +2%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22053 Points ∼44%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20111 Points ∼40% -9%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
18785 Points ∼38% -15%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
17618 Points ∼35% -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
14329 Points ∼29% -35%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
323 s * ∼4% -52%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
211.948 s * ∼3%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
210.067 s * ∼2% +1%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
176.329 s * ∼2% +17%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
569.349 Seconds * ∼3% -6%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
561.953 Seconds * ∼2% -5%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
535.187 Seconds * ∼2%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
440.036 Seconds * ∼2% +18%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6839
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22053
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5933
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
66.78 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.15 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.84 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
102.39 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
740 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
151 Points
Segítség
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
5305 Points ∼81% +7%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4964 Points ∼76%
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4771 Points ∼73% -4%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
5362 Points ∼58% +1%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
5328 Points ∼57%
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4698 Points ∼50% -12%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4042 Points ∼68%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
4001 Points ∼67% -1%
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3670 Points ∼61% -9%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4042 pontok
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5328 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4964 pontok
Segítség
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
Hynix HFS128G39TND
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
AS SSD
-103%
289%
1%
145%
Copy Game MB/s
204.33
1114.88
446%
157.55
-23%
240.51
18%
Copy Program MB/s
176.62
501.56
184%
111.13
-37%
299.45
70%
Copy ISO MB/s
297.32
1912.43
543%
194.96
-34%
1559.86
425%
Score Total
828
942
14%
2617
216%
882
7%
1592
92%
Score Write
210
48
-77%
807
284%
218
4%
376
79%
Score Read
416
646
55%
1232
196%
444
7%
852
105%
Access Time Write *
0.252
4.15
-1547%
0.027
89%
0.261
-4%
0.031
88%
Access Time Read *
0.12
0.08
33%
0.065
46%
0.077
36%
0.066
45%
4K-64 Write
130.69
15.3
-88%
528.56
304%
113.93
-13%
176.44
35%
4K-64 Read
338.75
371.6
10%
918.74
171%
361.43
7%
563.62
66%
4K Write
66.48
1.2
-98%
139.45
110%
90.81
37%
124.14
87%
4K Read
25.83
47.1
82%
48.57
88%
32.29
25%
44.75
73%
Seq Write
132.3
311.7
136%
1391.66
952%
130.17
-2%
751.8
468%
Seq Read
509.34
2276.6
347%
2648.88
420%
506.8
0%
2433.42
378%

* ... smaller is better

SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Sequential Read: 491.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 141.7 MB/s
512K Read: 345.6 MB/s
512K Write: 142.6 MB/s
4K Read: 18.83 MB/s
4K Write: 76.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 348.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 104.8 MB/s
3DMark
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
8626 Points ∼53% +228%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK
5862 Points ∼36% +123%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
3662 Points ∼22% +39%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
3517 Points ∼21% +34%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
2685 Points ∼16% +2%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
2629 Points ∼16%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
1988 Points ∼12% -24%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
1657 Points ∼10% -37%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
18373 Points ∼45% +206%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK
12298 Points ∼30% +105%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
7682 Points ∼19% +28%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7321 Points ∼18% +22%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
6002 Points ∼15%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
5990 Points ∼15% 0%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4133 Points ∼10% -31%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
3574 Points ∼9% -40%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
10081 Points ∼57% +37%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7952 Points ∼45% +8%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7440 Points ∼42% +1%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7371 Points ∼42%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4466 Points ∼25% -39%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4113 Points ∼23% -44%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
23170 Points ∼45% +207%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
9824 Points ∼19% +30%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7760 Points ∼15% +3%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7537 Points ∼15%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4826 Points ∼9% -36%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4251 Points ∼8% -44%
3DMark 11 Performance
7467 pontok
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
114747 pontok
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
20367 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5451 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
2630 pontok
Segítség
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Aorus x3 Plus v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
65 fps ∼100% +98%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
42.8 fps ∼66% +30%
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
40.7 (min: 37) fps ∼63% +24%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 2GB
GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
36.9 (min: 34) fps ∼57% +12%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
32.9 fps ∼51%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
30.6 fps ∼47% -7%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
24.2 fps ∼37% -26%
Asus N752VX-GC131T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256
16.32 (min: 14) fps ∼25% -50%
alacsony közepes magas ultra
Guild Wars 2 (2012) 43.3fps
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) 114fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 63.1fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 78.943.6fps
Thief (2014) 73.841.4fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 6940.221fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 897844fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 60606048.2fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 94.9fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 41.833.7fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 38.432.9fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 54.338.733.8fps
Doom (2016) 103.681.538.435.3fps
Overwatch (2016) 92.255.5fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 40.627.8fps
Prey (2017) 14483.360.749.9fps
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142Tooltip
The Witcher 3 high

Zajszint

Üresjárat
32.1 / 32.2 / 32.2 dB(A)
Terhelés
43.3 / 49.6 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
csendes
40 dB(A)
hallható
50 dB(A)
hangos
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm távolságról)   environment noise: 27.8 dB(A)
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
HP Pavilion 15t-bc200 X7P44AV
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
Noise
9%
7%
3%
1%
off / environment *
27.8
28.2
-1%
27.7
-0%
28.1
-1%
28.9
-4%
Idle Minimum *
32.1
28.2
12%
30.5
5%
28.1
12%
32.3
-1%
Idle Average *
32.2
28.2
12%
30.5
5%
29.1
10%
32.3
-0%
Idle Maximum *
32.2
28.2
12%
30.6
5%
29.1
10%
32.3
-0%
Load Average *
43.3
39
10%
40
8%
49.2
-14%
43.2
-0%
Witcher 3 ultra *
45
40
11%
Load Maximum *
49.6
46.3
7%
42.6
14%
49.2
1%
45.2
9%

* ... smaller is better

Max. terhelés
 30 °C44 °C44.2 °C 
 28 °C34.2 °C44.6 °C 
 26 °C26.4 °C41 °C 
Maximum: 44.6 °C
Átlag: 35.4 °C
47 °C60 °C37 °C
48.6 °C45.8 °C32.8 °C
50.6 °C31.4 °C28.2 °C
Maximum: 60 °C
Átlag: 42.4 °C
Tápegység (max.)  50 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.9402536.3373136.736.34034.835.35034.936.36336.4338033.532.610031.831.412530.130.216030.533.720029.643.825028.850.831528.154.140027.355.85002857.263028.359.780025.861.9100025.763.9125025.366.4160025.668.5200024.459.8250024.867.1315024.261.3400024.259.5500024.262.7630024.161.2800023.958.31000023.854.11250023.853.11600023.949.4SPL37.475.5N334.6median 25.6HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AVmedian 58.3Delta26.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.52 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.05 / 0.54 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 9.4 / 9.7 / 16.8 Watt
Terhelés midlight 76.5 / 105.6 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, Lite-On CV1-8B128, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Power Consumption
7%
4%
-30%
12%
Idle Minimum *
9.4
6.7
29%
8.5
10%
11.1
-18%
5.3
44%
Idle Average *
9.7
8.9
8%
9.1
6%
14.1
-45%
10.6
-9%
Idle Maximum *
16.8
10.8
36%
9.7
42%
18.4
-10%
11.8
30%
Load Average *
76.5
81.8
-7%
79.9
-4%
96.5
-26%
70.9
7%
Load Maximum *
105.6
122.7
-16%
121.5
-15%
159.5
-51%
119.8
-13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
86.5
92.2
-7%
97.7
-13%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
16h 11min
WiFi böngészés v1.3
8h 01min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
1h 50min
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 70 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 72 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 45 Wh
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 52.5 Wh
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 43 Wh
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 63.3 Wh
Battery Runtime
-1%
-52%
-31%
-38%
-5%
Reader / Idle
971
1066
10%
509
-48%
612
-37%
961
-1%
WiFi v1.3
481
484
1%
240
-50%
330
-31%
263
-45%
389
-19%
Load
110
96
-13%
46
-58%
76
-31%
115
5%

Pro

+ AMD RX 550 vagy GTX 1050 választható
+ kettős belső tárhelyöböl; NVMe támogatás
+ 1080p érintőkijelző és 4K UHD opciók
+ erősebb ház; frissített design
+ jó játékteljesítmény
+ nincs komolyabb CPU lefojtás
+ elég jó üzemidő

Kontra

- egyenetlen felszíni hőmérséklet; meleg csuklótámasz
- a fedél lehetne szilárdabb; kicsit kevésbé lötyögős
- a rendszerventilátorok folyamatosan aktívak; terhelés alatt zajos
- nincs Thunderbolt 3 vagy DisplayPort
- gyenge belső hangszórók
- macerás karbantartás
- korlátozott színlefedettség
- szivacsos clickpad
In review: HP Pavilion 15 Power (15t-cb000). Test model provided by CUKUSA.com
In review: HP Pavilion 15 Power (15t-cb000). Test model provided by CUKUSA.com

A Pavilion 15 Power erősebb, és sokkal inkább ajánlható notebook az alap Pavilion 15-höz képest, amennyiben a HQ CPU-k és Pascal-os videokártyák vonzóak. A ház jelentősen jobb lett, még a gépelés is kényelmesebb rajta, és a kijelző háttérfénye is erősebb, így összességében jobb érzés használni. Nem árt viszont tisztában lennünk azzal, hogy a kijelző nem annyira stabil, a karbantartása kényelmetlenebb, az sRGB lefedettsége kisebb, ami grafikus munkákhoz nem éppen jó választássá teszi.

A Pavilion 15 Power fő problémája az árazása. Az XPS 15 9560 még mindig az etalon 15 inches notebook, és a két gépet hasonló konfigurációban (7700HQ, GTX 1050, FHD. 1 TB HDD, 8 GB RAM) összehasonlítva az XPS 15 ára jelenleg 1200 USD, a Pavilion 1040 USD-os árával szemben (HP.com, vagy 920 USD a Cukusa.com-on). Az extra 200-300 dollár viszont többszörösen megtérül, mivel a Dell egyértelműen megveri a Pavilion 15 Power-t hordozhatóság, csatlakozók, kijelző, karbantarthatóság és ház stabilitás terén is. Ugyan melegebb és némileg hangosabb is, de a hátrányainak felsorolásával sokkal hamarabb végzünk, mint az előnyökkel. Amennyiben a költségvetésünk szoros, úgy viszont egyértelműen a Pavilion 15 Power-t javasoljuk a régebbi Pavilion 15t-vel szemben.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV - 07/03/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Váz
67 / 98 → 68%
Billentyűzet
79%
Érintőpad
71%
Csatlakoztathatóság
52 / 81 → 64%
Súly
61 / 67 → 87%
Akkumulátor
90%
Kijelző
82%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
89 / 85 → 100%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
91 / 92 → 99%
Hőmérséklet
83%
Zaj
75 / 95 → 79%
Audio
63%
Camera
48 / 85 → 56%
Átlag
73%
82%
Multimedia - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > HP Pavilion 15 Power (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1050) Laptop rövid értékelés
Allen Ngo, 2017-07- 5 (Update: 2017-07- 5)