Asus ROG Zephyrus GX501 Laptop rövid értékelés
Élő értékelés! – Anorexia 2.0. Az Asus ismét magáénak mondhatja a legvékonyabb notebookot. Egyelőre. Ezúttal a ROG Zephyrus GX501 gaming laptop nyerte el a címet. Alig 17.9 milliméteres vastagsága ellenére a 15 inches notebookot egy Intel Core i7 négymagos CPU-val és egy vadonatúj "Max-Q" designú Nvidia GTX 1080-nal. Az ultravékony játékosra már sikerült is vetnünk egy pillantást. Frissítés: A cikk immáron teljes.
Size Comparison
» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fényerő megoszlás: 83 %
Centrumban: 328 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1312:1 (Fekete: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.02 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 6.32 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9279 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5057 pontok | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5289 pontok | |
Segítség | ||
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 39562 pontok | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 16821 pontok | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 140964 pontok | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 27935 pontok | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14260 pontok | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5390 pontok | |
Segítség | ||
| alacsony | közepes | magas | ultra | QHD | 4K | ||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 118 | 61.9 | 43.7 | fps | |||
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 124 | 88 | 48 | fps | |||
| Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 164 | 144 | 55.6 | fps | |||
| Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) | 74.4 | 50.3 | 40 | fps | |||
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 197 | 172 | 65.7 | fps | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 125 | 105 | 43.6 | fps | |||
| Far Cry Primal (2016) | 92 | 87 | 41 | fps | |||
| The Division (2016) | 107 | 83.8 | 40.8 | fps | |||
| Doom (2016) | 134 | 128 | 53.9 | fps | |||
| Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 106 | 97.8 | 38.8 | fps | |||
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 87.3 | 47.9 | 29.6 | fps | |||
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 130 | 113 | 49 | fps | |||
| Titanfall 2 (2016) | 131 | 113 | 46.6 | fps | |||
| Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) | 123 | 118 | 63.7 | fps | |||
| Dishonored 2 (2016) | 78.2 | 66.5 | 43.4 | fps | |||
| Watch Dogs 2 (2016) | 86.7 | 66.7 | 34.9 | fps | |||
| Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 166 | 140 | 47.4 | fps | |||
| For Honor (2017) | 155 | 115 | 47.9 | fps | |||
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 86.7 | 51.9 | 34.1 | fps | |||
| Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) | 81.4 | 73.2 | 35.1 | fps | |||
| Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) | 88 | 86 | 41.9 | fps | |||
| Prey (2017) | 135 | 131 | 50.5 | fps | |||
| Rocket League (2017) | 235 | 103 | fps | ||||
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 136 | 88.4 | fps | ||||
| Team Fortress 2 (2017) | 124 | 125 | fps | ||||
| Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 125 | 111 | 104 | 79 | 27.1 | fps | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 130 | 86 | 64 | 27.2 | fps | ||
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 66 | 38 | fps | ||||
| Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 75 | 55.9 | 33.7 | fps | |||
| The Division 2 (2019) | 74 | 51.5 | 27.8 | fps | |||
| League of Legends (2019) | 145 | 144 | fps |
Zajszint
| Üresjárat |
| 32 / 33 / 34 dB(A) |
| Terhelés |
| 39 / 46 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB csendes 40 dB(A) hallható 50 dB(A) hangos |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról) environment noise: 31 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-13.2 °C / -23.8 F).
Asus Zephyrus GX501 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Gigabyte Aero 15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
| Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | 0.7 / 0.9 Watt |
| Üresjárat | 18 / 23 / 31 Watt |
| Terhelés |
79 / 196 Watt |
   
| |
Kulcs:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |