Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 Laptop rövid értékelés: Nagyjából egy MacBook Pro 17
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88 % | 08/2020 | Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | 2.5 kg | 19.5 mm | 17.00" | 3840x2400 | |
83 % | 11/2020 | MSI Creator 17 A10SGS i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.4 kg | 20 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
81 % | 06/2020 | HP Envy 17t-cg000 i7-1065G7, GeForce MX330 | 2.7 kg | 19.3 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
87 % | 05/2020 | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.7 kg | 21 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
87 % | 07/2020 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja
SDCardreader Transfer Speed | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Envy 17t-cg000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Envy 17t-cg000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
HP Envy 17t-cg000 | |
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
HP Envy 17t-cg000 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz | |
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q |

|
Fényerő megoszlás: 84 %
Centrumban: 539.4 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1686:1 (Fekete: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.12 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 3.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 90.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q Sharp LQ170R1, IPS, 17.00, 3840x2400 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080 | MSI Creator 17 A10SGS B173ZAN05.0 (AUO278E), Mini-LED IPS-Level, 17.30, 3840x2160 | HP Envy 17t-cg000 AU Optronics AUO168E, IPS, 17.30, 3840x2160 | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB AUO B173ZAN03.2 (AUO329B), IPS, 17.30, 3840x2160 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M APPA044, IPS, 16.00, 3072x1920 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 80% | 72% | 10% | 6% | -6% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 51.2 (27.2, 24) | 5.6 (2.6, 3) 89% | 45.2 (24, 21) 12% | 55.2 (26.8, 28.4) -8% | 52.4 (23.9, 28.5) -2% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 32 (18, 14) | 9.6 (5.2, 4.4) 70% | 8.8 (1.2, 7.6) 72% | 29.6 (16.4, 13.2) 7% | 26 (9.2, 16.8) 19% | 34.9 (17.8, 17.1) -9% |
PWM Frequency | 26600 (83) | 131700 | ||||
Screen | -46% | -6% | -46% | 17% | 12% | |
Brightness middle | 539.4 | 328 -39% | 996 85% | 383.4 -29% | 487 -10% | 519 -4% |
Brightness | 494 | 329 -33% | 952 93% | 382 -23% | 475 -4% | 477 -3% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 78 -7% | 93 11% | 86 2% | 95 13% | 86 2% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.35 -9% | 0.68 -113% | 0.34 -6% | 0.38 -19% | 0.39 -22% |
Contrast | 1686 | 937 -44% | 1465 -13% | 1128 -33% | 1282 -24% | 1331 -21% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.12 | 4.74 -15% | 4.21 -2% | 6.24 -51% | 1.19 71% | 2.28 45% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 7.65 | 8.99 -18% | 6.79 11% | 10.18 -33% | 2.43 68% | 6.54 15% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 3.91 | 2.12 46% | 2.03 48% | 3.7 5% | 0.5 87% | 0.86 78% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 1.5 | 6.8 -353% | 4.1 -173% | 6.6 -340% | 1.45 3% | 0.9 40% |
Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.207 100% | 2.272 97% | 2.21 100% | 2145 0% |
CCT | 6438 101% | 6446 101% | 7491 87% | 5973 109% | 6557 99% | 6572 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 90.4 | 64.8 -28% | 84 -7% | 88 -3% | 88 -3% | 78 -14% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 98.6 -1% | 97 -3% | 100 0% | 100 0% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 17% /
-26% | 33% /
1% | -18% /
-38% | 12% /
15% | 3% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
51.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.2 ms rise | |
↘ 24 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9687 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (2800 - 4176, n=27) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Dell G5 15 5590 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (456 - 524, n=27) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR | |
Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR | |
Dell G5 15 5590 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1111 - 1833, n=33) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Dell G5 15 5590 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (190 - 220, n=32) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR | |
Dell G5 15 5590 |
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (259 - 386, n=25) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5071 - 5780, n=26) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (33674 - 49474, n=26) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1233 - 1371, n=24) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (6988 - 8620, n=24) | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (10.1 - 14.1, n=22) | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (30.2 - 84.3, n=25) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (0.546 - 0.662, n=24) | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz | |
HP Envy 17t-cg000 | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz | |
HP Envy 17t-cg000 | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3649 pontok | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4385 pontok | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5672 pontok | |
Segítség |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Envy 17t-cg000 | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz | |
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS |
* ... smaller is better
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q Micron 2200S 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TCK | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Lite-On CA5-8D512 | HP Envy 17t-cg000 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Apple SSD AP1024 7171 | Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 19% | 20% | 79% | 39% | 104% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1342.99 | 1506.29 12% | 1189.72 -11% | 1135 -15% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 717.29 | 621.74 -13% | 766.4 7% | 584 -19% | ||
Copy ISO MB/s | 1732.23 | 1714.9 -1% | 1349.73 -22% | 1995 15% | ||
Score Total | 2448 | 2392 -2% | 2783 14% | 4581 87% | 4317 76% | 5411 121% |
Score Write | 1005 | 1034 3% | 1260 25% | 2334 132% | 2018 101% | 2130 112% |
Score Read | 966 | 913 -5% | 1013 5% | 1463 51% | 1536 59% | 2189 127% |
Access Time Write * | 0.679 | 0.167 75% | 0.026 96% | 0.032 95% | 0.095 86% | 0.036 95% |
Access Time Read * | 0.063 | 0.058 8% | 0.067 -6% | 0.076 -21% | 0.122 -94% | 0.061 3% |
4K-64 Write | 845.11 | 812.64 -4% | 1040.89 23% | 1985.92 135% | 1748.84 107% | 1788.53 112% |
4K-64 Read | 789.91 | 664.71 -16% | 856.79 8% | 1237.48 57% | 1266.78 60% | 1836.32 132% |
4K Write | 60.95 | 90.18 48% | 138.64 127% | 117.07 92% | 39.88 -35% | 106.1 74% |
4K Read | 31.98 | 46.61 46% | 40.63 27% | 49.45 55% | 15.85 -50% | 56.57 77% |
Seq Write | 993.94 | 1314.33 32% | 809.23 -19% | 2309.49 132% | 2288.6 130% | 2350 136% |
Seq Read | 1140.87 | 2019.26 77% | 1160.7 2% | 1761.83 54% | 2531.3 122% | 2958 159% |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 48% | 11% | 53% | 22% | 53% | |
Write 4K | 64.12 | 119 86% | 124.2 94% | 123.4 92% | 55.54 -13% | 147.57 130% |
Read 4K | 39.93 | 51.87 30% | 46.11 15% | 45.59 14% | 16.21 -59% | 47.57 19% |
Write Seq | 1191 | 2258 90% | 2320 95% | 1959.24 65% | 2221.97 87% | |
Read Seq | 1418 | 2283 61% | 2013 42% | 1762.83 24% | 2543.41 79% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 450.3 | 491 9% | 447 -1% | 489.3 9% | 398.51 -12% | 459.23 2% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 365 | 539.7 48% | 350.1 -4% | 558.8 53% | 648.05 78% | 515.07 41% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1563 | 2253 44% | 1463.1 -6% | 2979 91% | 2726.7 74% | 2166.8 39% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2683 | 3172 18% | 1750.5 -35% | 3432 28% | 3241.6 21% | 3430 28% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 445.5 | |||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 926.4 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 34% /
29% | 16% /
17% | 66% /
68% | 31% /
33% | 79% /
83% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q (5357 - 5914, n=4) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Score | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q (5390 - 6171, n=4) | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q (14129 - 15650, n=4) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q (12071 - 15054, n=4) | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q (18863 - 21105, n=4) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 18021 pontok | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31845 pontok | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13173 pontok | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5637 pontok | |
Segítség |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q (51.2 - 62.9, n=4) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
Asus TUF FX705GM |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q (65 - 74, n=2) | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR |
alacsony | közepes | magas | ultra | 4K | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 284.8 | 182.1 | 109 | 56.1 | 24.9 | fps |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 152 | 140 | 131 | 123 | 75.5 | fps |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 111 | 97.8 | 79.8 | 63.7 | fps | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 118 | 84 | 75 | 65 | 20 | fps |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 105 | 75 | 70 | 63 | fps | |
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 276.7 | 125.3 | 105.3 | 60.5 | 24.4 | fps |
Control (2019) | 183.7 | 67.1 | 50.4 | fps | ||
GRID 2019 (2019) | 157.4 | 109.4 | 103.4 | 73.5 | 33.1 | fps |
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 92.9 | 88 | 77.8 | fps | ||
Gears Tactics (2020) | 257.9 | 120.4 | 76.4 | 56.9 | 18.9 | fps |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Micron 2200S 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TCK | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512 | MSI Creator 17 A10SGS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB | HP Envy 17t-cg000 GeForce MX330, i7-1065G7, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -4% | -11% | 2% | -16% | -8% | |
off / environment * | 28 | 28.2 -1% | 30 -7% | 28.2 -1% | 30 -7% | 25 11% |
Idle Minimum * | 28 | 28.2 -1% | 32 -14% | 28.2 -1% | 35 -25% | 32 -14% |
Idle Average * | 28 | 28.2 -1% | 33 -18% | 28.2 -1% | 36 -29% | 35 -25% |
Idle Maximum * | 28 | 30.5 -9% | 40 -43% | 29.5 -5% | 38 -36% | 43 -54% |
Load Average * | 43.2 | 42.2 2% | 47 -9% | 43.9 -2% | 47 -9% | 44 -2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49 | 53 -8% | 46 6% | 43.9 10% | 49 -0% | 41 16% |
Load Maximum * | 50.5 | 55.5 -10% | 48 5% | 43.9 13% | 54 -7% | 45 11% |
* ... smaller is better
Zajszint
Üresjárat |
| 28 / 28 / 28 dB(A) |
Terhelés |
| 43.2 / 50.5 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB csendes 40 dB(A) hallható 50 dB(A) hangos |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.2 °C / 93.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.3 °C / -9.6 F).
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | ![]() ![]() |
Üresjárat | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Terhelés |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Kulcs:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, Micron 2200S 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TCK, IPS, 3840x2400, 17.00 | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | MSI Creator 17 A10SGS i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB, Mini-LED IPS-Level, 3840x2160, 17.30 | HP Envy 17t-cg000 i7-1065G7, GeForce MX330, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, Apple SSD AP1024 7171, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 11% | -78% | 24% | -69% | 18% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.8 | 3.9 33% | 15 -159% | 6.1 -5% | 16 -176% | 3.7 36% |
Idle Average * | 20.6 | 8.9 57% | 20 3% | 13 37% | 19 8% | 12.1 41% |
Idle Maximum * | 21 | 12.2 42% | 42 -100% | 13.5 36% | 30 -43% | 17 19% |
Load Average * | 104.7 | 83 21% | 150 -43% | 72.7 31% | 109 -4% | 91.5 13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 99.2 | 130 -31% | 170 -71% | 62.2 37% | 167 -68% | 103 -4% |
Load Maximum * | 107.6 | 168 -56% | 210 -95% | 97.1 10% | 246 -129% | 102.3 5% |
* ... smaller is better
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, 97 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh | MSI Creator 17 A10SGS i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 82 Wh | HP Envy 17t-cg000 i7-1065G7, GeForce MX330, 55 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, 99.8 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -49% | -56% | -39% | -26% | -14% | |
Reader / Idle | 1425 | 434 -70% | 924 -35% | 592 -58% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 580 | 296 -49% | 266 -54% | 275 -53% | 372 -36% | 718 24% |
Load | 120 | 67 -44% | 85 -29% | 140 17% | 58 -52% | |
Witcher 3 ultra | 54 |
Pro
Kontra
Összegzés - Egyedülálló
Az XPS 17 dicséretet érdemel, amiért tovább feszegette a határokat, mint a gyártók többsége. Senki más nem rendelkezik egy ultravékony, 17 hüvelykes, 16:10-es laptoppal, amely nyolcmagos Core i7 CPU-val (nemsokára Core i9 lesz) van felszerelve, 99 C-on üzemel teljes terhelés alatt egy GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q GPU-val, és mindezt egy USB-C adapter hajtja. Még egy gőzkamrás hűtőt is sikerül integrálnia - ez a funkció többnyire csak bizonyos gamer notebookokban található meg. A kockázatok és az adott hadver egészen elképesztőek az alternatívákhoz képest, amelyek általában ennyire nem kockáztatnak.
A rendszerrel töltött időnk után úgy gondoljuk, hogy jó lenne, ha tenne egy lépést hátra, és újra néhány alapra fókuszálna. Megerősíteni a zsanérokat, keményebbé tenni az érintőpad gombjait, integrálni egy webkamera takarót és javítani a töltési rátán - mindezt már elérte sok olyan laptop, amely fele annyiba kerül.
Azok a felhasználók, akik az XPS 17-et hosszabb ideig tartó, nagy terhelésnek szándékoznak kitenni, jobb, ha tudnak néhány hátrányról. Először is az akkumulátor nem biztos, hogy újratölt, mivel az USB-C adapter 130 wattra van korlátozva. Megvan az oka, hogy a GeForce RTX által hajtott laptopok többsége nem USB-C adaptereken fut, és ez azért van, mert a szabadalmaztatott, henger csatlakozós töltők több energiát képesek a nagy igényű rendszerbe nyomni. Másodsorban a fenntartott játékteljesítmény stabilitása nem garantált, mivel visszatérő képkockasebesség-csökkenéseket regisztráltunk. Amikor feltűnő ghostinggal párosul, a felhasználó ne úgy tekintsen rá, mint egy gamer notebookra, a Killer wireless és a GeForce RTX grafika ellenére.
Az XPS 17 a legjobb formáját a „kirobbanó” műveletekben hozza, mint a böngészés vagy videó szerkesztés, ahol a rendszer nincs erősen terhelve órákon keresztül. A kijelző, a dizájn és a teljesítmény/térfogat az, ami a rendszert vonzóbbá teszi, mint a legtöbb más 15.6 hüvelykes és 17.3 hüvelykes megoldás.
Egy egyedülálló 17 hüvelykes erőgép laptop közvetlen versenytárs nélkül. A lenyűgöző hardver és a megnyerő külső vonzani fogja a szemeket, de néhány alapvető aspektus több figyelmet érdemel.
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q - 07/15/2020 v7
Allen Ngo