Notebookcheck

Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 Laptop rövid értékelés: Nagyjából egy MacBook Pro 17

Gigantikus kijelző. Vajon a Dell képes ugyanúgy uralni a 17 hüvelykes piacot, ahogy meghódította a 15 hüvelykest? Az XPS 17 meglepően kompakt, olyan specifikációkkal, amelyek szerint akár kétszer akkora is lehetne, de néhány apróbb részletben mellélőtt.
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (fordította Zoltán Kiss),
XPS Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Ultrabook Touchscreen Geforce Comet Lake
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q (XPS 17 Széria)
Processzor
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Grafikus adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q - 6144 MB, Mag: 975 MHz, Memória: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, 442.92, Optimus
Memória
32768 MB 
, SK Hynix DDR4 PC4-25600, 21-21-21-47, Dual-Channel
Kijelző
17 hüvelyk 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 266 PPI, 10 pontos kapacitív, Sharp LQ170R1, IPS, SHP14D6, Dell P/N: 7JXK8, fényes: igen, HDR, 60 Hz
Alaplap
Intel WM490 (Comet Lake PCH-H)
Háttértár
Micron 2200S MTFDHBA1T0TCK, 1024 GB 
Hangkártya
Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller
Csatlakozók
4 USB 3.0, 4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 4 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 4 Thunderbolt, 4 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington zár, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm-es kombinált, Kártyaolvasó: SD olvasó, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, Brightness Sensor
Hálózat
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s (ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 19.5 x 374.45 x 248.05
Akkumulátor
97 Wh Lítium-Polimer
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix 720p
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: 2.5 W x2 + 1.5 W x2, Billentyűzet: Chiclet, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, USB-C -> HDMI és USB-A adapter, Dell Power Manager, Update, Mobile Connect, CinemaColor, Digital Delivery, 12 Hónap Garancia
Súly
2.49 kg, Tápegység: 426 g
Ár
3000 USD
Hivatkozások
Dell honlap
Dell noteszgépek
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88 %
08/2020
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q		2.5 kg19.5 mm17"3840x2400
83 %
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q		2.4 kg20 mm17.3"3840x2160
81 %
06/2020
HP Envy 17t-cg000
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX330		2.7 kg19.3 mm17.3"3840x2160
87 %
05/2020
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		2.7 kg21 mm17.3"3840x2160
87 %
07/2020
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.7 kg19.9 mm17.3"1920x1080
❌
399 mm 259 mm 19.3 mm 2.7 kg396 mm 270 mm 21 mm 2.7 kg396 mm 259 mm 20 mm 2.4 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.7 kg374.45 mm 248.05 mm 19.5 mm 2.5 kg358 mm 246 mm 16.2 mm 2 kg
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: 2x USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, SD card reader, 3.5 mm combo audio
Right: 2x USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, SD card reader, 3.5 mm combo audio
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: Wedge lock, 2x USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3
Left: Wedge lock, 2x USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208.5 MB/s ∼100% +7%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207 MB/s ∼99% +6%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
195.4 MB/s ∼94%
HP Envy 17t-cg000
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
74.96 MB/s ∼36% -62%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
245 MB/s ∼100% +24%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208.3 MB/s ∼85% +5%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
197.9 MB/s ∼81%
HP Envy 17t-cg000
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.6 MB/s ∼34% -58%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1390 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
HP Envy 17t-cg000
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1382 (726min - 1504max) MBit/s ∼99% +5%
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1340 MBit/s ∼96% +1%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1321 (1216min - 1419max) MBit/s ∼95%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1182 (1085min - 1338max) MBit/s ∼85% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1410 MBit/s ∼100% +64%
HP Envy 17t-cg000
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1297 (574min - 1585max) MBit/s ∼92% +50%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1283 (1089min - 1413max) MBit/s ∼91% +49%
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1270 MBit/s ∼90% +47%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
862 (667min - 971max) MBit/s ∼61%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1321 (1216-1419)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø862 (667-971)
ColorChecker
8.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q: 10.3 ∆E min: 3.57 - max: 18.89 ∆E
473.6
cd/m²		479.8
cd/m²		497.9
cd/m²
464.5
cd/m²		539.4
cd/m²		499.2
cd/m²
455.3
cd/m²		529.1
cd/m²		506.3
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
Sharp LQ170R1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 539.4 cd/m² Átlag: 493.9 cd/m² Minimum: 33.9 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 84 %
Centrumban: 539.4 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1686:1 (Fekete: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.12 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 3.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 90.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Sharp LQ170R1, IPS, 17, 3840x2400		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080		MSI Creator 17 A10SGS
B173ZAN05.0 (AUO278E), Mini-LED IPS-Level, 17.3, 3840x2160		HP Envy 17t-cg000
AU Optronics AUO168E, IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160		Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
AUO B173ZAN03.2 (AUO329B), IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160		Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
APPA044, IPS, 16, 3072x1920
Response Times
80%
72%
10%
6%
-6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
51.2 (27.2, 24)
5.6 (2.6, 3)
89%
45.2 (24, 21)
12%
55.2 (26.8, 28.4)
-8%
52.4 (23.9, 28.5)
-2%
Response Time Black / White *
32 (18, 14)
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
70%
8.8 (1.2, 7.6)
72%
29.6 (16.4, 13.2)
7%
26 (9.2, 16.8)
19%
34.9 (17.8, 17.1)
-9%
PWM Frequency
26600 (83)
131700
Screen
-46%
-6%
-46%
17%
12%
Brightness middle
539.4
328
-39%
996
85%
383.4
-29%
487
-10%
519
-4%
Brightness
494
329
-33%
952
93%
382
-23%
475
-4%
477
-3%
Brightness Distribution
84
78
-7%
93
11%
86
2%
95
13%
86
2%
Black Level *
0.32
0.35
-9%
0.68
-113%
0.34
-6%
0.38
-19%
0.39
-22%
Contrast
1686
937
-44%
1465
-13%
1128
-33%
1282
-24%
1331
-21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.12
4.74
-15%
4.21
-2%
6.24
-51%
1.19
71%
2.28
45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.65
8.99
-18%
6.79
11%
10.18
-33%
2.43
68%
6.54
15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.91
2.12
46%
2.03
48%
3.7
5%
0.5
87%
0.86
78%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
6.8
-353%
4.1
-173%
6.6
-340%
1.45
3%
0.9
40%
Gamma
2.15 102%
2.2 100%
2.207 100%
2.272 97%
2.21 100%
2145 0%
CCT
6438 101%
6446 101%
7491 87%
5973 109%
6557 99%
6572 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
90.4
64.8
-28%
84
-7%
88
-3%
88
-3%
78
-14%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
98.6
-1%
97
-3%
100
0%
100
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
17% / -26%
33% / 1%
-18% / -38%
12% / 15%
3% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
51.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27.2 ms rise
↘ 24 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17699 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700171017201730174017501760177017801790180018101820Tooltip
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Micron 2200S MTFDHBA1T0TCK; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1366 (1339.18-1451.59)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1362 (1352.68-1494.38)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1640 (1625.22-1699.96)
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1773 (1724.58-1815.79)
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1619 (1602.44-1728.31)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) - CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4339 Points ∼100% +30%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4288 Points ∼99% +29%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
4136 Points ∼95% +24%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3883 Points ∼89% +17%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
3712 Points ∼86% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (2800 - 4133, n=18)
3444 Points ∼79% +3%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
3329 Points ∼77%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3224 Points ∼74% -3%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
3178 Points ∼73% -5%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H
2707 Points ∼62% -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
2357 Points ∼54% -29%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
2107 Points ∼49% -37%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) - CPU (Single Core)
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
495 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
489 Points ∼99% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (461 - 511, n=18)
489 Points ∼99% +1%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
483 Points ∼98%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
481 Points ∼97% 0%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
478 Points ∼97% -1%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
460 Points ∼93% -5%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
446 Points ∼90% -8%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
441 Points ∼89% -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
428 Points ∼86% -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
422 Points ∼85% -13%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H
403 Points ∼81% -17%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit - CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1892 (1814.88min - 1892.51max) Points ∼100% +30%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1863 Points ∼98% +28%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1754 Points ∼93% +21%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1737 (1552.73min - 1737.47max) Points ∼92% +20%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points ∼91% +19%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1111 - 1833, n=24)
1567 Points ∼83% +8%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
1452 (1339.18min - 1451.59max) Points ∼77%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1398 (1313.46min - 1397.77max) Points ∼74% -4%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
1347 (1253.05min - 1347.16max) Points ∼71% -7%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H
1191 Points ∼63% -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
1097 Points ∼58% -24%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
889 (827.87min - 893.75max) Points ∼47% -39%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit - CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (190 - 214, n=24)
204 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
203 Points ∼100% 0%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
202 Points ∼99%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
195 Points ∼96% -3%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
193 Points ∼95% -4%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points ∼93% -6%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
189 Points ∼93% -6%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
189 Points ∼93% -6%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
186 Points ∼91% -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
178 Points ∼87% -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
173 Points ∼85% -14%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H
165 Points ∼81% -18%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU - BMW27 CPU
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
508 Seconds * ∼100% -54%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
347 Seconds * ∼68% -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
345 Seconds * ∼68% -5%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
330 Seconds * ∼65%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (280 - 386, n=16)
326 Seconds * ∼64% +1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
297 Seconds * ∼58% +10%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
293 Seconds * ∼58% +11%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
286 Seconds * ∼56% +13%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
262 Seconds * ∼52% +21%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 - 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5232 - 5605, n=17)
5354 MIPS ∼100% +1%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5336 MIPS ∼100% 0%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
5316 MIPS ∼99%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
5026 MIPS ∼94% -5%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
4924 MIPS ∼92% -7%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
4889 MIPS ∼91% -8%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4699 MIPS ∼88% -12%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4634 MIPS ∼87% -13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4471 MIPS ∼84% -16%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 - 7z b 4
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
51468 MIPS ∼100% +24%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
48577 MIPS ∼94% +17%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
46591 MIPS ∼91% +12%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
45938 MIPS ∼89% +11%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (33674 - 48397, n=17)
42222 MIPS ∼82% +2%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
41529 MIPS ∼81%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
36693 MIPS ∼71% -12%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
36370 MIPS ∼71% -12%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
24388 MIPS ∼47% -41%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
1305 Points ∼100%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1302 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1233 - 1371, n=16)
1302 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
1219 Points ∼93% -7%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1197 Points ∼92% -8%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
1183 Points ∼91% -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1108 Points ∼85% -15%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8666 Points ∼100% +11%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
8068 Points ∼93% +3%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
7825 Points ∼90%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (6988 - 8620, n=16)
7743 Points ∼89% -1%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
6298 Points ∼73% -20%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
5260 Points ∼61% -33%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
4399 Points ∼51% -44%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset - 4k Preset
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
13.1 fps ∼100% +18%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
12.5 fps ∼95% +13%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
12.193 fps ∼93% +10%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
11.865 fps ∼91% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (10.1 - 13, n=15)
11.5 fps ∼88% +4%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
11.1 fps ∼85%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.5 fps ∼80% -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
9.27 fps ∼71% -16%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
7.28 fps ∼56% -34%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
95.8 s ∼100% +103%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
64.1 s ∼67% +36%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
63.6 s ∼66% +35%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
55.3 s ∼58% +17%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (43 - 84.3, n=16)
52.2 s ∼54% +11%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
51.9 s ∼54% +10%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
47.1 s ∼49%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean - Overall mean
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.646 sec * ∼100% -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.626 sec * ∼97% -6%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.617 sec * ∼96% -5%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.59 sec * ∼91%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.581 sec * ∼90% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (0.547 - 0.59, n=15)
0.578 sec * ∼89% +2%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.568 sec * ∼88% +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1452 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
144 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
202 Points
Segítség
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
9022 Points ∼70% +33%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
8560 Points ∼66% +26%
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB
7296 Points ∼56% +8%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Micron 2200S MTFDHBA1T0TCK
6781 Points ∼52%
HP Envy 17t-cg000
GeForce MX330, i7-1065G7, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3499 Points ∼27% -48%
Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8176 Points ∼78% +6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
8028 Points ∼77% +4%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Micron 2200S MTFDHBA1T0TCK
7683 Points ∼74%
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB
7633 Points ∼73% -1%
HP Envy 17t-cg000
GeForce MX330, i7-1065G7, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
6847 Points ∼66% -11%
Essentials
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
10024 Points ∼88% +5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
9831 Points ∼86% +3%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Micron 2200S MTFDHBA1T0TCK
9507 Points ∼83%
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB
9303 Points ∼81% -2%
HP Envy 17t-cg000
GeForce MX330, i7-1065G7, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7822 Points ∼68% -18%
Score
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6483 Points ∼80% +14%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6290 Points ∼78% +11%
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB
5758 Points ∼71% +2%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Micron 2200S MTFDHBA1T0TCK
5672 Points ∼70%
HP Envy 17t-cg000
GeForce MX330, i7-1065G7, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4102 Points ∼51% -28%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6317 Points ∼93% +44%
HP Envy 17t-cg000
GeForce MX330, i7-1065G7, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5267 Points ∼77% +20%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Micron 2200S MTFDHBA1T0TCK
4385 Points ∼64%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
5217 Points ∼86% +43%
HP Envy 17t-cg000
GeForce MX330, i7-1065G7, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3762 Points ∼62% +3%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Micron 2200S MTFDHBA1T0TCK
3649 Points ∼60%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3649 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4385 pontok
Segítség
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Envy 17t-cg000
GeForce MX330, i7-1065G7, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3071 μs * ∼100% -371%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
1933.4 μs * ∼63% -197%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
1029.5 μs * ∼34% -58%
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB
972.6 μs * ∼32% -49%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Micron 2200S MTFDHBA1T0TCK
651.5 μs * ∼21%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
453 μs * ∼15% +30%

* ... smaller is better

Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Micron 2200S MTFDHBA1T0TCK		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Lite-On CA5-8D512		HP Envy 17t-cg000
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G		Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ		Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Apple SSD AP1024 7171		Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
AS SSD
19%
20%
79%
39%
104%
Copy Game MB/s
1342.99
1506.29
12%
1189.72
-11%
1135
-15%
Copy Program MB/s
717.29
621.74
-13%
766.4
7%
584
-19%
Copy ISO MB/s
1732.23
1714.9
-1%
1349.73
-22%
1995
15%
Score Total
2448
2392
-2%
2783
14%
4581
87%
4317
76%
5411
121%
Score Write
1005
1034
3%
1260
25%
2334
132%
2018
101%
2130
112%
Score Read
966
913
-5%
1013
5%
1463
51%
1536
59%
2189
127%
Access Time Write *
0.679
0.167
75%
0.026
96%
0.032
95%
0.095
86%
0.036
95%
Access Time Read *
0.063
0.058
8%
0.067
-6%
0.076
-21%
0.122
-94%
0.061
3%
4K-64 Write
845.11
812.64
-4%
1040.89
23%
1985.92
135%
1748.84
107%
1788.53
112%
4K-64 Read
789.91
664.71
-16%
856.79
8%
1237.48
57%
1266.78
60%
1836.32
132%
4K Write
60.95
90.18
48%
138.64
127%
117.07
92%
39.88
-35%
106.1
74%
4K Read
31.98
46.61
46%
40.63
27%
49.45
55%
15.85
-50%
56.57
77%
Seq Write
993.94
1314.33
32%
809.23
-19%
2309.49
132%
2288.6
130%
2350
136%
Seq Read
1140.87
2019.26
77%
1160.7
2%
1761.83
54%
2531.3
122%
2958
159%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
48%
11%
53%
22%
53%
Write 4K
64.12
119
86%
124.2
94%
123.4
92%
55.54
-13%
147.57
130%
Read 4K
39.93
51.87
30%
46.11
15%
45.59
14%
16.21
-59%
47.57
19%
Write Seq
1191
2258
90%
2320
95%
1959.24
65%
2221.97
87%
Read Seq
1418
2283
61%
2013
42%
1762.83
24%
2543.41
79%
Write 4K Q32T1
450.3
491
9%
447
-1%
489.3
9%
398.51
-12%
459.23
2%
Read 4K Q32T1
365
539.7
48%
350.1
-4%
558.8
53%
648.05
78%
515.07
41%
Write Seq Q32T1
1563
2253
44%
1463.1
-6%
2979
91%
2726.7
74%
2166.8
39%
Read Seq Q32T1
2683
3172
18%
1750.5
-35%
3432
28%
3241.6
21%
3430
28%
Write 4K Q8T8
445.5
Read 4K Q8T8
926.4
Total Average (Program / Settings)
34% / 29%
16% / 17%
66% / 68%
31% / 33%
79% / 83%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Micron 2200S MTFDHBA1T0TCK
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2683 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1563 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 365 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 450.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1418 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1191 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 39.93 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 64.12 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630164016501660167016801690170017101720173017401750176017701780179018001810182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020203020402050206020702080209021002110212021302140215021602170218021902200221022202230224022502260227022802290230023102320233023402350236023702380239024002410242024302440245024602470248024902500251025202530Tooltip
: Ø2391 (2106.78-2525.81)
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7732 Points ∼100% +44%
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
7372 Points ∼95% +38%
Eluktronics RP-15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
6280 Points ∼81% +17%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H
5744 Points ∼74% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
  (5357 - 5914, n=3)
5707 Points ∼74% +7%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
5689 Points ∼74% +6%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H
5357 Points ∼69%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H
3601 Points ∼47% -33%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK
3353 Points ∼43% -37%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7878 Points ∼100% +40%
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
7482 Points ∼95% +33%
Eluktronics RP-15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
6600 Points ∼84% +17%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H
6045 Points ∼77% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
  (5637 - 6171, n=3)
5953 Points ∼76% +6%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
5640 Points ∼72% 0%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H
5637 Points ∼72%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H
3774 Points ∼48% -33%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK
3676 Points ∼47% -35%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
19655 Points ∼100% +38%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
19338 Points ∼98% +36%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
17792 Points ∼91% +25%
Eluktronics RP-15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
16808 Points ∼86% +18%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H
15334 Points ∼78% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
  (14241 - 15650, n=3)
15156 Points ∼77% +6%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H
14241 Points ∼72%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H
9930 Points ∼51% -30%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK
8532 Points ∼43% -40%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
15591 Points ∼100% +4%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H
15054 Points ∼97%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
  (13033 - 15054, n=3)
13873 Points ∼89% -8%
Eluktronics RP-15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
13824 Points ∼89% -8%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13742 Points ∼88% -9%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H
13311 Points ∼85% -12%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H
13027 Points ∼84% -13%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
11288 Points ∼72% -25%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK
8801 Points ∼56% -42%
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
26413 Points ∼100% +40%
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
26292 Points ∼100% +39%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
23414 Points ∼89% +24%
Eluktronics RP-15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
22629 Points ∼86% +20%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H
20793 Points ∼79% +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
  (18863 - 21105, n=3)
20180 Points ∼76% +7%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H
18863 Points ∼71%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10875H
12865 Points ∼49% -32%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK
12388 Points ∼47% -34%
3DMark 11 Performance
18021 pontok
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
31845 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13173 pontok
3DMark Time Spy Score
5637 pontok
Segítség
The Witcher 3 | Shadow of the Tomb Raider
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
75.3 (63min) fps ∼100% +34%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
72.7 (61min - 82max) fps ∼97% +30%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
66.1 (62min - 70max) fps ∼88% +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
  (56.1 - 62.9, n=3)
59.1 fps ∼78% +5%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
56.1 (51min - 61max) fps ∼75%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
55.6 (53min - 60max) fps ∼74% -1%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M
38.3 (31min) fps ∼51% -32%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
37.7 fps ∼50% -33%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
36.5 fps ∼48% -35%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
99 (78min) fps ∼100% +52%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
90 fps ∼91% +38%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
73 fps ∼74% +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
  (65 - 74, n=2)
69.5 fps ∼70% +7%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
68 fps ∼69% +5%
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
65 fps ∼66%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
47 fps ∼47% -28%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
44 (35min - 73max) fps ∼44% -32%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M
36 (24min) fps ∼36% -45%
0102030405060Tooltip
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Micron 2200S MTFDHBA1T0TCK: Ø45 (6-55)
alacsony közepes magas ultra4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 284.8 182.1 109 56.1 24.9 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 152 140 131 123 75.5 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 111 97.8 79.8 63.7 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 118 84 75 65 20 fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 105 75 70 63 fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 276.7 125.3 105.3 60.5 24.4 fps
Control (2019) 183.7 67.1 50.4 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 157.4 109.4 103.4 73.5 33.1 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 92.9 88 77.8 fps
Gears Tactics (2020) 257.9 120.4 76.4 56.9 18.9 fps
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Micron 2200S MTFDHBA1T0TCK		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512		MSI Creator 17 A10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB		HP Envy 17t-cg000
GeForce MX330, i7-1065G7, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G		Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ		Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Noise
-4%
-11%
2%
-16%
-8%
off / environment *
28
28.2
-1%
30
-7%
28.2
-1%
30
-7%
25
11%
Idle Minimum *
28
28.2
-1%
32
-14%
28.2
-1%
35
-25%
32
-14%
Idle Average *
28
28.2
-1%
33
-18%
28.2
-1%
36
-29%
35
-25%
Idle Maximum *
28
30.5
-9%
40
-43%
29.5
-5%
38
-36%
43
-54%
Load Average *
43.2
42.2
2%
47
-9%
43.9
-2%
47
-9%
44
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
53
-8%
46
6%
43.9
10%
49
-0%
41
16%
Load Maximum *
50.5
55.5
-10%
48
5%
43.9
13%
54
-7%
45
11%

* ... smaller is better

Zajszint

Üresjárat
28 / 28 / 28 dB(A)
Terhelés
43.2 / 50.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
csendes
40 dB(A)
hallható
50 dB(A)
hangos
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm távolságról)   environment noise: 28 dB(A)
Max. terhelés
 39 °C53 °C39.8 °C 
 31 °C44.8 °C27.6 °C 
 29.4 °C33.8 °C27.8 °C 
Maximum: 53 °C
Átlag: 36.2 °C
34.2 °C39.2 °C34.8 °C
28.6 °C33 °C30 °C
29 °C31 °C30.6 °C
Maximum: 39.2 °C
Átlag: 32.3 °C
Tápegység (max.)  49 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 22.2 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 38.9 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.2 °C / 93.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-5.2 °C / -9.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203834.2382531.429.131.43134.333.934.34030.62730.65031.12531.16332.230.532.28034.222.534.210044.821.844.812550.819.150.816052.717.852.720053.917.953.925058.11658.131558.717.858.740060.915.560.950059.614.759.663059.813.859.880062.512.662.5100062.912.762.91250621262160064.912.264.9200068.712.568.7250061.512.861.5315059.81359.8400062.413.662.450006213.76263006314.263800065.614.565.61000067.614.267.61250064.21464.21600054.513.254.5SPL75.825.775.8N38.60.738.6median 61.5median 14median 61.5Delta2.922.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-QApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.29 / 6.8 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 5.8 / 20.6 / 21 Watt
Terhelés midlight 104.7 / 107.6 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, Micron 2200S MTFDHBA1T0TCK, IPS, 3840x2400, 17		Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3		MSI Creator 17 A10SGS
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB, Mini-LED IPS-Level, 3840x2160, 17.3		HP Envy 17t-cg000
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX330, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3		Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3		Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, Apple SSD AP1024 7171, IPS, 3072x1920, 16
Power Consumption
11%
-78%
24%
-69%
18%
Idle Minimum *
5.8
3.9
33%
15
-159%
6.1
-5%
16
-176%
3.7
36%
Idle Average *
20.6
8.9
57%
20
3%
13
37%
19
8%
12.1
41%
Idle Maximum *
21
12.2
42%
42
-100%
13.5
36%
30
-43%
17
19%
Load Average *
104.7
83
21%
150
-43%
72.7
31%
109
-4%
91.5
13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
99.2
130
-31%
170
-71%
62.2
37%
167
-68%
103
-4%
Load Maximum *
107.6
168
-56%
210
-95%
97.1
10%
246
-129%
102.3
5%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
23h 45min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9h 40min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
2h 00min
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, 97 Wh		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh		MSI Creator 17 A10SGS
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 82 Wh		HP Envy 17t-cg000
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX330, 55 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh		Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, 99.8 Wh
Battery Runtime
-49%
-56%
-39%
-26%
-14%
Reader / Idle
1425
434
-70%
924
-35%
592
-58%
WiFi v1.3
580
296
-49%
266
-54%
275
-53%
372
-36%
718
24%
Load
120
67
-44%
85
-29%
140
17%
58
-52%
Witcher 3 ultra
54

Pro

+ minőségi IPS kijelző, nagy kontrasztarány, >90 százalékos AdobeRGB
+ hozzáférhető 2x SODIMM és 2x M.2 2280 helyek
+ a mérethez és súlyhoz képest nagy teljesítmény
+ vonzó és kompakt dizájn
+ alapból jól kalibrált kijelző
+ USB-A és HDMI adapter a csomagban
+ GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q opció
+ nagyon nagy képernyő-test arány
+ 4x USB-C Thunderbolt 3 port
+ nagyon nagy érintőpad
+ hosszú üzemidő

Kontra

- az akkumulátor lassan merül, miközben csatlakoztatva és terhelve van
- nagyon magas CPU hőmérsékletek nagy terhelés alatt
- középszerű fekete-fehér és szürke-szürke válaszidők
- a szénszálas felületeken meglátszik minden ujjlenyomat
- a váz hajlíthatóbb, mint az XPS 15
- nincsenek integrált USB-A vagy HDMI portok
- lágy integrált érintőpad gombok
- a zsanérok merevebbek lehetnének
- nincs webkamera takaró

Összegzés - Egyedülálló

Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 rövid értékelés. Test unit provided by Dell
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 rövid értékelés. Test unit provided by Dell

Az XPS 17 dicséretet érdemel, amiért tovább feszegette a határokat, mint a gyártók többsége. Senki más nem rendelkezik egy ultravékony, 17 hüvelykes, 16:10-es laptoppal, amely nyolcmagos Core i7 CPU-val (nemsokára Core i9 lesz) van felszerelve, 99 C-on üzemel teljes terhelés alatt egy GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q GPU-val, és mindezt egy USB-C adapter hajtja. Még egy gőzkamrás hűtőt is sikerül integrálnia - ez a funkció többnyire csak bizonyos gamer notebookokban található meg. A kockázatok és az adott hadver egészen elképesztőek az alternatívákhoz képest, amelyek általában ennyire nem kockáztatnak.

A rendszerrel töltött időnk után úgy gondoljuk, hogy jó lenne, ha tenne egy lépést hátra, és újra néhány alapra fókuszálna. Megerősíteni a zsanérokat, keményebbé tenni az érintőpad gombjait, integrálni egy webkamera takarót és javítani a töltési rátán - mindezt már elérte sok olyan laptop, amely fele annyiba kerül.

Azok a felhasználók, akik az XPS 17-et hosszabb ideig tartó, nagy terhelésnek szándékoznak kitenni, jobb, ha tudnak néhány hátrányról. Először is az akkumulátor nem biztos, hogy újratölt, mivel az USB-C adapter 130 wattra van korlátozva. Megvan az oka, hogy a GeForce RTX által hajtott laptopok többsége nem USB-C adaptereken fut, és ez azért van, mert a szabadalmaztatott, henger csatlakozós töltők több energiát képesek a nagy igényű rendszerbe nyomni. Másodsorban a fenntartott játékteljesítmény stabilitása nem garantált, mivel visszatérő képkockasebesség-csökkenéseket regisztráltunk. Amikor feltűnő ghostinggal párosul, a felhasználó ne úgy tekintsen rá, mint egy gamer notebookra, a Killer wireless és a GeForce RTX grafika ellenére. 

Az XPS 17 a legjobb formáját a „kirobbanó” műveletekben hozza, mint a böngészés vagy videó szerkesztés, ahol a rendszer nincs erősen terhelve órákon keresztül. A kijelző, a dizájn és a teljesítmény/térfogat az, ami a rendszert vonzóbbá teszi, mint a legtöbb más 15.6 hüvelykes és 17.3 hüvelykes megoldás.

Egy egyedülálló 17 hüvelykes erőgép laptop közvetlen versenytárs nélkül. A lenyűgöző hardver és a megnyerő külső vonzani fogja a szemeket, de néhány alapvető aspektus több figyelmet érdemel.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q - 07/15/2020 v7
Allen Ngo

Váz
89 / 98 → 90%
Billentyűzet
89%
Érintőpad
88%
Csatlakoztathatóság
66 / 80 → 82%
Súly
60 / 20-72 → 77%
Akkumulátor
88 / 95 → 93%
Kijelző
86%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
86 / 90 → 95%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
88 / 90 → 97%
Hőmérséklet
86%
Zaj
84 / 95 → 88%
Audio
80%
Camera
39 / 85 → 46%
Átlag
79%
88%
Multimedia - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 Laptop rövid értékelés: Nagyjából egy MacBook Pro 17
Allen Ngo, 2020-08- 3 (Update: 2020-08- 3)
Allen Ngo
Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - US Editor in Chief