Notebookcheck

Apple iPhone 8 Plus Smartphone rövid értékelés

Daniel Schmidt, Patrick Afschar Kaboli (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 10/23/2017
Apple iPhone 8 Smartphone Touchscreen

Nagy testvér, kis újítás. Kis testvéréhez hasonlóan, az Apple iPhone 8 Plus sem kapott sok új funkciót. Egy némileg frissített házat kapunk, üveg hátlappal, valamint az A11 chipet. Ettől függetlenül apróbb optimalizálásokkal sok területen javult az iPhone.

Apple iPhone 8 Plus (iPhone 8 Széria)
Processzor
Apple A11 Bionic
Grafikus adapter
Apple A11 Bionic GPU - 3072 MB
Memória
3072 MB 
, Samsung LPDDR4x
Kijelző
5.5 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 401 PPI, multitouch, IPS, Apple True Tone Retina HD, fényes: igen
Háttértár
Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus), 256 GB 
, 250 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: Lightning, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: 3 tengelyes giroszenzor, gyorsulásmérő, közelségérzékelő, iránytű, barométer, Galileo, QZSS, Lightning
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900 és 2100 MHz), LTE (FDD-Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30 és 66; TDD: 34, 38, 39, 40 és 41), LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.5 x 158.4 x 78.1
Akkumulátor
10.28 Wh, 2691 mAh Lítium-Ion, 3.82 V, Beszédidő 3G (gyártói adat): 21 h
Operációs rendszer
Apple iOS 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Dual-Camera
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: sztereo , Billentyűzet: virtuális, hálózati töltő (5 watt), Lightning kábel, Lightning headset, adapter (Lightning-jack), 12 Hónap Garancia, vezeték nélküli töltés (Qi), IP67 minősítés, feji SAR: 0.99 W/kg, fanless
Released
09/23/2017
Súly
202 g
Ár
1079 Euró
Hivatkozások

 

Portrait mode Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Natural light
Portrait mode Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Studio light
Portrait mode Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Contour light
Portrait mode Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Stage light
Portrait mode Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Stage light monochrome
Telephoto iPhone 8 Plus
Telephoto OnePlus 5
Telephoto Galaxy Note 8

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Test chart Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Standard camera
Test chart Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Telephoto
Test chart Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Crop standard camera
Test chart Apple iPhone 8 Plus: Crop Telephoto
Almost perfect grayscale performance
Almost perfect grayscale performance
Almost full sRGB gamut
Almost full sRGB gamut
No problems for the saturation
No problems for the saturation
High color accuracy
High color accuracy
534
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
559
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
548
cd/m²
558
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 559 cd/m² Átlag: 537.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.47 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 90 %
Centrumban: 559 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1471:1 (Fekete: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | - Ø
99.9% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.25
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Screen
1%
8%
-3%
-61%
Brightness
538
580
8%
553
3%
562
4%
680
26%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
97
8%
93
3%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.38
0.44
-16%
0.35
8%
0.42
-11%
Contrast
1471
1373
-7%
1591
8%
1657
13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.3
1.2
8%
1.4
-8%
1.7
-31%
4.3
-231%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.8
1.6
11%
1.3
28%
1.6
11%
4.8
-167%
Gamma
2.25 107%
2.25 107%
2.21 109%
2.13 113%
2.33 103%
CCT
6797 96%
6688 97%
6667 97%
6435 101%
7255 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.1
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.83
99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8499 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.4 ms).
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute Metal Score 4.1 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
15295 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
14962 Points ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 7
12425 Points ∼81% -19%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
10558 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
10380 Points ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 7
5922 Points ∼56% -44%
Huawei Mate 9
6445 Points ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼63% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6744 Points ∼64% -36%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
4263 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
4162 Points ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 7
3527 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei Mate 9
1866 Points ∼44% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼47% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2028 Points ∼48% -52%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
218158 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
204270 Points ∼94% -6%
Apple iPhone 7
142532 Points ∼65% -35%
Huawei Mate 9
124087 Points ∼57% -43%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼76% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
173997 Points ∼80% -20%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
35209 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone 7
24875 Points ∼71% -29%
Huawei Mate 9
11897 Points ∼34% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
14050 Points ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
13265 Points ∼38% -62%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
719.7 ms * ∼26%
Apple iPhone 8
730.8 ms * ∼27% -2%
Apple iPhone 7
1113.4 ms * ∼41% -55%
Huawei Mate 9
2733.7 ms * ∼100% -280%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2236.7 ms * ∼82% -211%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
1876.8 ms * ∼69% -161%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
362 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
359 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 7
202 Points ∼56% -44%
Huawei Mate 9
152 Points ∼42% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
154 Points ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
159 Points ∼44% -56%

Legend

 
Apple iPhone 8 Plus Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

* ... smaller is better

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
166.9 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
161.3 fps ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone 7
110.3 fps ∼66% -34%
Huawei Mate 9
80 fps ∼48% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
105 fps ∼63% -37%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
119.4 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
119.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 7
57.7 fps ∼48% -52%
Huawei Mate 9
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼48% -51%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
59 fps ∼49% -51%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
71 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
70.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone 7
60.7 fps ∼85% -15%
Huawei Mate 9
34 fps ∼48% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
51 fps ∼72% -28%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
79.2 fps ∼69%
Apple iPhone 8
114.5 fps ∼100% +45%
Apple iPhone 7
58.5 fps ∼51% -26%
Huawei Mate 9
37 fps ∼32% -53%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼33% -52%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
38 fps ∼33% -52%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
49 fps ∼91%
Apple iPhone 8
54 fps ∼100% +10%
Apple iPhone 7
42.2 fps ∼78% -14%
Huawei Mate 9
24 fps ∼44% -51%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼78% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
42 fps ∼78% -14%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
56.4 fps ∼51%
Apple iPhone 8
109.7 fps ∼100% +95%
Apple iPhone 7
59.4 fps ∼54% +5%
Huawei Mate 9
28 fps ∼26% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼21% -59%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
23 fps ∼21% -59%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2187 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone 8
1854 Points ∼74% -15%
Huawei Mate 9
1997 Points ∼79% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2512 Points ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2417 Points ∼96% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3325 Points ∼93%
Apple iPhone 8
2783 Points ∼78% -16%
Huawei Mate 9
2142 Points ∼60% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3571 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2723 Points ∼76% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2981 Points ∼91%
Apple iPhone 8
2505 Points ∼77% -16%
Huawei Mate 9
2108 Points ∼65% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3265 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2648 Points ∼81% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2109 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone 8
1989 Points ∼81% -6%
Huawei Mate 9
2117 Points ∼86% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2346 Points ∼95% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3069 Points ∼88%
Apple iPhone 8
2581 Points ∼74% -16%
Huawei Mate 9
2294 Points ∼66% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼100% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2661 Points ∼76% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2781 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone 8
2421 Points ∼76% -13%
Huawei Mate 9
2240 Points ∼70% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2584 Points ∼81% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
25641 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
24131 Points ∼94% -6%
Apple iPhone 7
15450 Points ∼60% -40%
Huawei Mate 9
15104 Points ∼59% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
22829 Points ∼89% -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
113380 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
112424 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 7
63974 Points ∼56% -44%
Huawei Mate 9
35626 Points ∼31% -69%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼29% -71%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
36807 Points ∼32% -68%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
64405 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
62006 Points ∼96% -4%
Apple iPhone 7
37676 Points ∼58% -42%
Huawei Mate 9
27364 Points ∼42% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼45% -55%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
32399 Points ∼50% -50%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
35209 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone 7
24875 Points ∼71% -29%
Huawei Mate 9
11897 Points ∼34% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
14050 Points ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
13265 Points ∼38% -62%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
223.5 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
206.7 Points ∼92% -8%
Apple iPhone 7
165.86 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei Mate 9
68.6 Points ∼31% -69%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
62.198 Points ∼28% -72%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
69.57 Points ∼31% -69%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
719.7 ms * ∼26%
Apple iPhone 8
730.8 ms * ∼27% -2%
Apple iPhone 7
1113.4 ms * ∼41% -55%
Huawei Mate 9
2733.7 ms * ∼100% -280%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2236.7 ms * ∼82% -211%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
1876.8 ms * ∼69% -161%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
362 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
359 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 7
202 Points ∼56% -44%
Huawei Mate 9
152 Points ∼42% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
154 Points ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
159 Points ∼44% -56%

* ... smaller is better

Max. terhelés
 40.7 °C39.8 °C35.8 °C 
 36.2 °C35.1 °C33.8 °C 
 34.8 °C34.5 °C34.1 °C 
Maximum: 40.7 °C
Átlag: 36.1 °C
33.9 °C38 °C40.6 °C
33.3 °C36 °C37.7 °C
33.3 °C35.6 °C35.6 °C
Maximum: 40.6 °C
Átlag: 36 °C
Tápegység (max.)  46.4 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.641.62525.437.83125.337.44032.933.85033.6386331.632.38028.432.31002738.212520.843.81602249.320021.351.825020.852.131521.253.640019.454.250019.562.463017.765.480017.965.1100017.866.3125017.365.8160017.468.4200016.767.7250017.267.8315018.270.4400017.971.3500017.669.8630017.771800017.871.31000017.965.31250018.162.81600018.257.6SPL3080.1N1.348.9median 17.9Apple iPhone 8 Plusmedian 65.3Delta1.37.331.635.225.433.125.329.932.92533.629.231.631.228.426.9272620.833.92243.521.349.920.854.821.257.519.462.319.566.417.767.317.96417.863.217.364.917.462.516.756.317.26018.26117.963.217.662.817.760.317.861.617.962.518.164.518.255.83075.61.336.8median 17.9Huawei P10 Plusmedian 61.61.34.831.635.825.440.125.335.532.931.933.631.631.638.928.433.82727.220.828.62236.421.342.620.851.521.258.619.465.719.571.417.770.717.968.317.870.717.370.317.462.516.760.817.258.318.265.317.967.817.672.417.770.617.871.517.97318.164.518.249.33081.41.351.2median 17.9HTC U11median 65.31.310.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Apple iPhone 8 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P10 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HTC U11 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.07 / 0.14 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.72 / 2.45 / 2.52 Watt
Terhelés midlight 3.84 / 9.02 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
34h 45min
WiFi böngészés v1.3 (Mobile Safari iOS 11)
10h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 13min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
3h 31min
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Battery Runtime
-11%
-1%
5%
6%
3%
-20%
-11%
Reader / Idle
2085
1629
-22%
1835
-12%
1565
-25%
1538
-26%
1754
-16%
1333
-36%
1534
-26%
H.264
733
698
-5%
813
11%
742
1%
947
29%
802
9%
505
-31%
623
-15%
WiFi v1.3
657
585
-11%
587
-11%
736
12%
758
15%
695
6%
505
-23%
518
-21%
Load
211
202
-4%
225
7%
275
30%
219
4%
236
12%
230
9%
247
17%

Pro

+ True-Tone kijelző
+ gyors lapkakészlet
+ kiváló kamera
+ pontos GPS
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ nagy Wi-Fi teljesítmény
+ sok LTE sáv
+ víz- és porálló
+ remek kivitelezés...

Kontra

- ...de nehéz és nagy
- nem bővíthető tárhely
- csak 12 hónap garancia
- nincs sztereo jack
- csak középszerű hangszóró
- kissé alacsony kijelző felbontás
- nehezebb elődjénél
- nagyon korlátozott NFC funkcionalitás
In review: Apple iPhone 8 Plus
In review: Apple iPhone 8 Plus

Az iPhone 8 Plus valamivel többet kínál, mint kisebb testvére. Nem csak a tömegére gondolunk ezalatt, bár az is jelentősen több, mint 200 gramm, hanem leginkább a dual kamerára. A kijelző ugyancsak nagyobb pixelmennyiséggel van megáldva, és 1 gigával több RAM-ot is kapunk. Az új, üveg hátlap vegyes érzelmeket keltett. Remekül összerakták, és jó a tapintása, de pillanatok alatt maszatos lesz. A Plus modell ezen felül kifejezetten nagy, egy 5.5 inches kijelzőhöz.

A kamera erősen hasonlít az iPhone 7 Plus-hoz, és a második lencse egy 2x optikai zoomot is kínál. Portrékhoz egy lágy Bokeh effektet is biztosít, amely eléggé jól néz ki. A kamera képminősége amúgy is javult, és most már Ultra HD videókat is rögzíthetünk, másodpercenként 60 képkockával. Full HD-ben pedig akár 240 FPS is elérhető, amellyel lenyűgöző lassított felvételek készíthetők. Az iPhone 8 Plus kamerája lényegében az összességében legjobb ilyen rendszer okostelefonokban.

Az iPhone 8 Plus remek választás a videózás szerelmeseinek. Amennyiben emiatt megvennénk, a nagyobb, 256 GB-os modellért érdemes fizetnünk, mivel a 4K @ 60 FPS videóknak bőséges tárhelykapacitás kell.

Az új A11 lapkakészlet ismét maga mögött hagyja a riválisokat. A fentieken kívül gyors LTE, hosszú üzemidő, valamint por- és vízálló ház jellemzi a készüléket. Komolyabb hiányosságot - kisebb testvéréhez hasonlóan - nem sikerült felfedeznünk benne, de van pár zavaró apróság. A rövid jótállás, és a gyenge hálózati adapter például ilyen. A hangminőség lehetne jobb 3G hálózatokban, és amúgy is csak átlagosak a belepakolt sztereo hangszórók.

Az Apple lépései a bővített valóság (Augmented Reality) felé fontosak, és valószínűleg sikeres irányvonalat jelentenek, mivel egy hatalmas platform nyílik meg ezzel, amelyben hatalmas potenciál rejlik a gyors, és a felhasználók számára is nyereséges technológiai fejlődéssel. Az AR már most is jól működik, de még nem annyira pontos és kifinomult, mint mondjuk az Asus ZenFone AR.

Mindent egybevetve az iPhone 8 remek készülék, kiváló minőségű alkatrészekkel, de mind a telefon, mind a hasznos kiegészítői nagyon drágák.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Apple iPhone 8 Plus - 09/29/2017 v6
Daniel Schmidt, Patrick Afschar Kaboli

Váz
91%
Billentyűzet
73 / 75 → 97%
Érintőpad
94%
Csatlakoztathatóság
43 / 60 → 72%
Súly
88%
Akkumulátor
93%
Kijelző
92%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
65 / 63 → 100%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
81 / 70 → 100%
Hőmérséklet
90%
Zaj
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
90%
Átlag
82%
89%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Apple iPhone 8 Plus Smartphone rövid értékelés
Daniel Schmidt, Patrick Afschar Kaboli, 2017-10-23 (Update: 2017-10-23)