C 2018
Notebookcheck

Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus (2018) Smartphone rövid értékelés

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 07/06/2018
Android Touchscreen

Super AMOLED FHD+. A Samsung Galaxy A sorozat egy adott vevőkör számára készült: azoknak, akik egy egyszerű külsejű, de kiváló minőségben kivitelezett okostelefont akarnak. Alaposan leteszteltük a 6 colos Galaxy A6+-t, és megosztjuk a vásárlókkal, hogy mire számíthatnak. A készülék körülbelül 370 euróba (~$425; nemzetközi verzió: ~$350) kerül.

Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Galaxy Széria)
Processzor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memória
3072 MB 
, 3GB
Kijelző
6 hüvelyk 2:1, 2220 x 1080 pixel 411 PPI, kapacitív, Super AMOLED, FHD+, fényes: igen
Háttértár
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm-es audio jack, Kártyaolvasó: microSD, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: gyorsulásmérő, közelségérzékelő, helyzetérzékelő, G-szenzor, iránytű, microUSB
Hálózat
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), HSPA (850/900/1900/2100 MHz), LTE (Band:1/3/7/8/20/38/40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.9 x 160.2 x 75.7
Akkumulátor
3500 mAh Lítium-Ion
Operációs rendszer
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix dupla kamera: 16MP (f/1.7) + 5MP (f/1.9)
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix f/1.9
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: 1 hangszóró, Billentyűzet: virtuális, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, headset, SIM tű, USB táp, Samsung Experience 9.0, Microsoft Apps, Bixby, 24 Hónap Garancia, SAR - fej: 0.36 W/kg, SAR - test: 1.39 W/kg, fanless
Súly
191 g, Tápegység: 76 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s ∼100% +160%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼80% +108%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s ∼78% +103%
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
224 MBit/s ∼72% +88%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼69% +80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=279)
199 MBit/s ∼64% +67%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
198 MBit/s ∼64% +66%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
119 MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
307 MBit/s ∼100% +172%
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s ∼94% +156%
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
274 MBit/s ∼89% +142%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
233 MBit/s ∼76% +106%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=279)
195 MBit/s ∼64% +73%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
167 MBit/s ∼54% +48%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s ∼48% +31%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy A6+
Samsung Galaxy A6+
Samsung Galaxy A6+
Samsung Galaxy A6+
Samsung Galaxy A6+
Samsung Galaxy A6+
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
496
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
498
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 532 cd/m² Átlag: 512.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 93 %
Centrumban: 519 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
95% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.06
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
Huawei P20 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
HTC U11 Life
SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.2
Sony Xperia XA2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Nokia 7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Screen
-106%
-94%
-136%
8%
-204%
-77%
Brightness middle
519
528
2%
545
5%
513
-1%
539
4%
458
-12%
458
-12%
Brightness
513
525
2%
526
3%
506
-1%
542
6%
473
-8%
463
-10%
Brightness Distribution
93
89
-4%
87
-6%
93
0%
93
0%
88
-5%
92
-1%
Black Level *
0.51
0.42
0.42
0.51
0.22
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.8
4.7
-161%
4.9
-172%
5
-178%
1.6
11%
7.1
-294%
4
-122%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.6
8.9
-147%
8.5
-136%
11.4
-217%
2.6
28%
14.5
-303%
7.4
-106%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
6.4
-327%
5.4
-260%
7.8
-420%
1.5
-0%
10.5
-600%
4.7
-213%
Gamma
2.06 107%
2.22 99%
2.31 95%
2.2 100%
2.28 96%
2.28 96%
2.19 100%
CCT
6462 101%
7987 81%
7610 85%
7964 82%
6422 101%
8951 73%
7425 88%
Contrast
1035
1298
1221
898
2082

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8677 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
55332 Points ∼47%
Huawei P20 Lite
68232 Points ∼58% +23%
HTC U11 Life
73617 Points ∼63% +33%
Sony Xperia XA2
71552 Points ∼61% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
60603 Points ∼52% +10%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points ∼57% +20%
Nokia 7 Plus
117165 Points ∼100% +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (54731 - 60077, n=6)
57018 Points ∼49% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 250848, n=366)
72912 Points ∼62% +32%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
70016 Points ∼49%
Huawei P20 Lite
88550 Points ∼62% +26%
Sony Xperia XA2
89228 Points ∼63% +27%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
82343 Points ∼58% +18%
Nokia 7 Plus
141701 Points ∼100% +102%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (56497 - 71712, n=7)
68691 Points ∼48% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=145)
111758 Points ∼79% +60%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
4422 Points ∼73%
Huawei P20 Lite
4793 Points ∼79% +8%
HTC U11 Life
4835 Points ∼80% +9%
Sony Xperia XA2
5006 Points ∼82% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4060 Points ∼67% -8%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points ∼81% +11%
Nokia 7 Plus
6077 Points ∼100% +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4171 - 4759, n=7)
4525 Points ∼74% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (6998 - 9868, n=233)
4440 Points ∼73% 0%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
5199 Points ∼76%
Huawei P20 Lite
5704 Points ∼84% +10%
HTC U11 Life
5818 Points ∼85% +12%
Sony Xperia XA2
5844 Points ∼86% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5035 Points ∼74% -3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points ∼86% +13%
Nokia 7 Plus
6825 Points ∼100% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4914 - 5656, n=7)
5264 Points ∼77% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (4147 - 13211, n=396)
4801 Points ∼70% -8%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
814 Points ∼74%
Huawei P20 Lite
858 Points ∼78% +5%
HTC U11 Life
858 Points ∼78% +5%
Sony Xperia XA2
921 Points ∼84% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
659 Points ∼60% -19%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points ∼73% -1%
Nokia 7 Plus
1101 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (10 - 814, n=7)
536 Points ∼49% -34%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=471)
680 Points ∼62% -16%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
968 Points ∼42%
Huawei P20 Lite
848 Points ∼37% -12%
HTC U11 Life
1515 Points ∼66% +57%
Sony Xperia XA2
1500 Points ∼65% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1528 Points ∼66% +58%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points ∼44% +5%
Nokia 7 Plus
2298 Points ∼100% +137%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (943 - 975, n=7)
961 Points ∼42% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15875, n=471)
1622 Points ∼71% +68%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
914 Points ∼37%
Huawei P20 Lite
1930 Points ∼77% +111%
HTC U11 Life
838 Points ∼33% -8%
Sony Xperia XA2
1328 Points ∼53% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1508 Points ∼60% +65%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points ∼42% +14%
Nokia 7 Plus
2503 Points ∼100% +174%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (770 - 1522, n=7)
978 Points ∼39% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=471)
1171 Points ∼47% +28%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
2560 Points ∼51%
Huawei P20 Lite
3109 Points ∼62% +21%
HTC U11 Life
3215 Points ∼65% +26%
Sony Xperia XA2
3256 Points ∼65% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
2593 Points ∼52% +1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points ∼70% +36%
Nokia 7 Plus
4976 Points ∼100% +94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2560 - 2898, n=7)
2701 Points ∼54% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=471)
2367 Points ∼48% -8%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
1165 Points ∼49%
Huawei P20 Lite
1445 Points ∼61% +24%
HTC U11 Life
1368 Points ∼58% +17%
Sony Xperia XA2
1563 Points ∼66% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1408 Points ∼59% +21%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points ∼55% +13%
Nokia 7 Plus
2369 Points ∼100% +103%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (389 - 1169, n=7)
936 Points ∼40% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=475)
1185 Points ∼50% +2%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3229 Points ∼77%
Huawei P20 Lite
3116 Points ∼74% -3%
HTC U11 Life
3956 Points ∼95% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2777 - 3362, n=5)
3065 Points ∼73% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14417, n=170)
4186 Points ∼100% +30%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3912 Points ∼67%
Huawei P20 Lite
3749 Points ∼64% -4%
HTC U11 Life
4193 Points ∼71% +7%
Sony Xperia XA2
4170 Points ∼71% +7%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points ∼74% +12%
Nokia 7 Plus
5867 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3272 - 4022, n=7)
3820 Points ∼65% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 11598, n=220)
4163 Points ∼71% +6%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
754 Points ∼46%
Huawei P20 Lite
935 Points ∼57% +24%
HTC U11 Life
877 Points ∼53% +16%
Sony Xperia XA2
865 Points ∼53% +15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points ∼56% +23%
Nokia 7 Plus
1646 Points ∼100% +118%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (741 - 778, n=7)
755 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=221)
1229 Points ∼75% +63%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
1852 Points ∼67%
Huawei P20 Lite
1757 Points ∼64% -5%
HTC U11 Life
1779 Points ∼65% -4%
Sony Xperia XA2
1631 Points ∼59% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1713 Points ∼62% -8%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points ∼78% +15%
Nokia 7 Plus
2749 Points ∼100% +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1521 - 1855, n=7)
1785 Points ∼65% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 4183, n=325)
1588 Points ∼58% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
366 Points ∼32%
Huawei P20 Lite
207 Points ∼18% -43%
HTC U11 Life
729 Points ∼63% +99%
Sony Xperia XA2
709 Points ∼61% +94%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
710 Points ∼61% +94%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points ∼33% +4%
Nokia 7 Plus
1161 Points ∼100% +217%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (363 - 369, n=7)
366 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5220, n=325)
1124 Points ∼97% +207%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
445 Points ∼33%
Huawei P20 Lite
257 Points ∼19% -42%
HTC U11 Life
839 Points ∼63% +89%
Sony Xperia XA2
811 Points ∼61% +82%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
816 Points ∼61% +83%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points ∼35% +4%
Nokia 7 Plus
1332 Points ∼100% +199%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (441 - 449, n=7)
444 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=333)
1075 Points ∼81% +142%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
1832 Points ∼67%
Huawei P20 Lite
1760 Points ∼64% -4%
HTC U11 Life
1711 Points ∼63% -7%
Sony Xperia XA2
1737 Points ∼64% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1752 Points ∼64% -4%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points ∼78% +16%
Nokia 7 Plus
2734 Points ∼100% +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1504 - 1833, n=7)
1771 Points ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4150, n=356)
1484 Points ∼54% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
692 Points ∼37%
Huawei P20 Lite
109 Points ∼6% -84%
HTC U11 Life
1257 Points ∼66% +82%
Sony Xperia XA2
1251 Points ∼66% +81%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1053 Points ∼56% +52%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points ∼38% +5%
Nokia 7 Plus
1895 Points ∼100% +174%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (690 - 716, n=7)
701 Points ∼37% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (104 - 8312, n=356)
1527 Points ∼81% +121%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
803 Points ∼39%
Huawei P20 Lite
138 Points ∼7% -83%
HTC U11 Life
1336 Points ∼66% +66%
Sony Xperia XA2
1334 Points ∼66% +66%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1155 Points ∼57% +44%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points ∼42% +6%
Nokia 7 Plus
2035 Points ∼100% +153%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (800 - 824, n=7)
810 Points ∼40% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (127 - 6378, n=364)
1304 Points ∼64% +62%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
13988 Points ∼70%
Huawei P20 Lite
13387 Points ∼67% -4%
HTC U11 Life
12919 Points ∼64% -8%
Sony Xperia XA2
13112 Points ∼65% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13057 Points ∼65% -7%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points ∼85% +22%
Nokia 7 Plus
20085 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (13596 - 15177, n=6)
14128 Points ∼70% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (7095 - 36762, n=511)
12516 Points ∼62% -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
12527 Points ∼43%
Huawei P20 Lite
11713 Points ∼40% -6%
HTC U11 Life
18469 Points ∼63% +47%
Sony Xperia XA2
18534 Points ∼63% +48%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13314 Points ∼45% +6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points ∼45% +6%
Nokia 7 Plus
29333 Points ∼100% +134%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12323 - 12550, n=6)
12445 Points ∼42% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 160199, n=511)
16923 Points ∼58% +35%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
12825 Points ∼48%
Huawei P20 Lite
12048 Points ∼45% -6%
HTC U11 Life
16859 Points ∼63% +31%
Sony Xperia XA2
16974 Points ∼64% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13256 Points ∼50% +3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points ∼52% +9%
Nokia 7 Plus
26610 Points ∼100% +107%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12604 - 12878, n=6)
12752 Points ∼48% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=512)
14348 Points ∼54% +12%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
22 fps ∼44%
Huawei P20 Lite
19 fps ∼38% -14%
HTC U11 Life
30 fps ∼60% +36%
Sony Xperia XA2
30 fps ∼60% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
34 fps ∼68% +55%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps ∼46% +5%
Nokia 7 Plus
50 fps ∼100% +127%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (21 - 22, n=7)
18.4 fps ∼37% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=537)
29.5 fps ∼59% +34%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
20 fps ∼42%
Huawei P20 Lite
19 fps ∼40% -5%
HTC U11 Life
29 fps ∼60% +45%
Sony Xperia XA2
31 fps ∼65% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
33 fps ∼69% +65%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps ∼46% +10%
Nokia 7 Plus
48 fps ∼100% +140%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (20 - 34, n=7)
23 fps ∼48% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=540)
24.2 fps ∼50% +21%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
9.3 fps ∼40%
Huawei P20 Lite
8.7 fps ∼38% -6%
HTC U11 Life
14 fps ∼61% +51%
Sony Xperia XA2
14 fps ∼61% +51%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼65% +61%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps ∼43% +5%
Nokia 7 Plus
23 fps ∼100% +147%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (9.2 - 9.4, n=7)
7.96 fps ∼35% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 115, n=459)
15.8 fps ∼69% +70%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
8.9 fps ∼40%
Huawei P20 Lite
8.9 fps ∼40% 0%
HTC U11 Life
14 fps ∼64% +57%
Sony Xperia XA2
15 fps ∼68% +69%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼68% +69%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps ∼44% +8%
Nokia 7 Plus
22 fps ∼100% +147%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (8.8 - 18, n=7)
11.4 fps ∼52% +28%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=462)
15.3 fps ∼70% +72%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
6.1 fps ∼44%
Huawei P20 Lite
5.2 fps ∼37% -15%
HTC U11 Life
9.7 fps ∼69% +59%
Sony Xperia XA2
9.7 fps ∼69% +59%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9.1 fps ∼65% +49%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps ∼46% +5%
Nokia 7 Plus
14 fps ∼100% +130%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (6 - 6.1, n=7)
5.2 fps ∼37% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 69.3, n=324)
13.4 fps ∼96% +120%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
5.8 fps ∼39%
Huawei P20 Lite
5.6 fps ∼37% -3%
HTC U11 Life
9.8 fps ∼65% +69%
Sony Xperia XA2
10 fps ∼67% +72%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9 fps ∼60% +55%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps ∼42% +9%
Nokia 7 Plus
15 fps ∼100% +159%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.7 - 13, n=7)
7.9 fps ∼53% +36%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=326)
13.3 fps ∼89% +129%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3.5 fps ∼38%
Huawei P20 Lite
3.1 fps ∼33% -11%
HTC U11 Life
5.5 fps ∼59% +57%
Sony Xperia XA2
5.5 fps ∼59% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼56% +49%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼38% 0%
Nokia 7 Plus
8.3 fps ∼89% +137%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 3.5, n=7)
2.93 fps ∼31% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 40, n=254)
9.31 fps ∼100% +166%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3.3 fps ∼36%
Huawei P20 Lite
3.3 fps ∼36% 0%
HTC U11 Life
5.4 fps ∼59% +64%
Sony Xperia XA2
6 fps ∼66% +82%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼57% +58%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼38% +6%
Nokia 7 Plus
9.1 fps ∼100% +176%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 7, n=7)
4.36 fps ∼48% +32%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 50, n=257)
8.44 fps ∼93% +156%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
15.07 fps ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.38 - 5.41, n=2)
5.4 fps ∼36%
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72)
12.1 fps ∼80%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
258 Points ∼38%
Nokia 7 Plus
349 Points ∼51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (129 - 129, n=2)
129 Points ∼19%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2606, n=70)
679 Points ∼100%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U11 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7880, ARM Mali-T830 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
53.89 Points ∼100% +143%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=394)
35.4 Points ∼66% +60%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
32.222 Points ∼60% +45%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
28.993 Points ∼54% +31%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
27.368 Points ∼51% +23%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.837 Points ∼50% +21%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
23.424 Points ∼43% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.6, n=7)
22.2 Points ∼41% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
22.191 Points ∼41%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
10945 Points ∼100% +171%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=530)
5305 Points ∼48% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
5256 Points ∼48% +30%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
4893 Points ∼45% +21%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
4771 Points ∼44% +18%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points ∼40% +10%
Huawei P20 Lite
4191 Points ∼38% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
4032 Points ∼37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4078, n=7)
3927 Points ∼36% -3%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=549)
11710 ms * ∼100% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11370 - 11863, n=7)
11570 ms * ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
11449.6 ms * ∼98%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
10788.1 ms * ∼92% +6%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
10235.7 ms * ∼87% +11%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
9493 ms * ∼81% +17%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8741.5 ms * ∼75% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
6442.4 ms * ∼55% +44%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
3937.3 ms * ∼34% +66%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
168 Points ∼100% +81%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
106 Points ∼63% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=264)
106 Points ∼63% +14%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
100 Points ∼60% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67)
93 Points ∼55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 99, n=4)
93 Points ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
89 Points ∼53% -4%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points ∼51% -8%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
86 Points ∼51% -8%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018Huawei P20 LiteHTC U11 LifeSony Xperia XA2Samsung Galaxy A5 2017BQ Aquaris X ProNokia 7 PlusAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
72%
30%
-4%
-29%
-10%
20%
-18%
-26%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
69.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
59.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
64.75 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
55.98 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-17%
49.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-27%
62.31
-8%
46.3 (3.4 - 87.1, n=106)
-32%
44.7 (3.4 - 87.1, n=301)
-34%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
82.75 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
86.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
73.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
78.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
82.21
-1%
65.5 (8.2 - 96.5, n=106)
-22%
63 (8.2 - 96.5, n=301)
-25%
Random Write 4KB
16.1
71.07
341%
50.2
212%
13.82
-14%
12.13
-25%
12.07
-25%
19.62
22%
18.1 (0.75 - 77.3, n=145)
12%
14.8 (0.14 - 164, n=580)
-8%
Random Read 4KB
72.91
48.19
-34%
39.3
-46%
43.07
-41%
22.41
-69%
37.97
-48%
54.65
-25%
35.9 (3.59 - 117, n=145)
-51%
36.4 (1.59 - 173, n=580)
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB
88.48
198.3
124%
120
36%
127.38
44%
77.1
-13%
139.63
58%
211.6
139%
93.7 (14.8 - 189, n=145)
6%
75.8 (2.99 - 242, n=580)
-14%
Sequential Read 256KB
298.81
293.94
-2%
268
-10%
271.46
-9%
182.03
-39%
270.46
-9%
283.12
-5%
229 (25.8 - 440, n=145)
-23%
222 (12.1 - 895, n=580)
-26%
Dead Trigger 2
 BeállításokÉrték
 high30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Temple Run 2
 BeállításokÉrték
 default60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Max. terhelés
 26.4 °C26.4 °C25.9 °C 
 26.8 °C26.4 °C26.7 °C 
 26.9 °C26.6 °C26.2 °C 
Maximum: 26.9 °C
Átlag: 26.5 °C
25.5 °C25.3 °C25.2 °C
25.3 °C26.1 °C25.7 °C
25.3 °C26 °C25.6 °C
Maximum: 26.1 °C
Átlag: 25.6 °C
Tápegység (max.)  24.2 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.241.72532.942.33137.239.94031.739.75039.640.86328.333.58027.32910026.929.512526.737.21602439.120020.947.825020.949.631519.551.240018.55950017.560.363017.563.880015.766.7100015.869.9125016.674.9160015.873.1200015.471.2250015.574.431501678.9400015.878.650001675.1630016.378.7800016.371.21000016.270.21250016.465.71600016.461SPL28.686.9N1.165.7median 16.4median 66.7Delta2.111.435.24232.941.837.230.431.736.639.641.828.331.427.331.526.934.226.731.42429.620.938.320.947.619.546.618.55417.562.817.559.415.758.915.86316.666.415.869.315.471.315.573.41674.815.875.91676.516.371.216.371.616.271.316.467.516.459.628.684.11.153.6median 16.4median 632.111.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018Huawei P20 Lite
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P20 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.01 / 0.22 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.62 / 0.96 / 0.99 Watt
Terhelés midlight 1.85 / 3.04 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3500 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-95%
-76%
-45%
-28%
-82%
-102%
-74%
-86%
Idle Minimum *
0.62
0.98
-58%
0.63
-2%
0.39
37%
0.64
-3%
0.67
-8%
0.65
-5%
0.73 (0.6 - 1.26, n=7)
-18%
0.884 (0.2 - 3.4, n=613)
-43%
Idle Average *
0.96
2
-108%
2.1
-119%
1.61
-68%
1.36
-42%
1.7
-77%
1.76
-83%
2.14 (0.96 - 4.22, n=7)
-123%
1.725 (0.6 - 6.2, n=612)
-80%
Idle Maximum *
0.99
2.11
-113%
2.15
-117%
1.62
-64%
1.4
-41%
1.78
-80%
1.78
-80%
2.2 (0.99 - 4.29, n=7)
-122%
1.997 (0.74 - 6.6, n=613)
-102%
Load Average *
1.85
3.9
-111%
3.34
-81%
3.12
-69%
2.53
-37%
4.42
-139%
4.47
-142%
3.02 (1.85 - 5.48, n=7)
-63%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=607)
-118%
Load Maximum *
3.04
5.62
-85%
4.83
-59%
4.92
-62%
3.63
-19%
6.3
-107%
9.13
-200%
4.45 (3.04 - 6.57, n=7)
-46%
5.7 (1.2 - 14.2, n=607)
-88%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
30h 17min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 16min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
5h 35min
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
3500 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Battery Runtime
-41%
-10%
4%
20%
-17%
-26%
Reader / Idle
1817
750
-59%
1820
0%
2503
38%
2418
33%
1840
1%
1703
-6%
H.264
916
470
-49%
798
-13%
766
-16%
984
7%
644
-30%
706
-23%
WiFi v1.3
848
582
-31%
725
-15%
886
4%
843
-1%
730
-14%
672
-21%
Load
335
247
-26%
303
-10%
298
-11%
467
39%
254
-24%
158
-53%

Pro

+ nagy felbontású szelfikamera
+ precíz GPS
+ hosszú üzemidő
+ OLED kijelző

Kontra

- középszerű rendszerteljesítmény
- lassú arcfelismerés
- nincs USB-C

Verdict

In Review: Samsung Galaxy A6+. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.
In Review: Samsung Galaxy A6+. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

Tesztjeink alapján a Samsung Galaxy A6+ jó középkategóriás okostelefonnak tűnik. A vegyes benchmark eredmények miatt a kategória alsóbb részére került a vetélytársak között, de a jó üzemidő felfelé húzza közöttük. A legfontosabb erénye azonban a Super AMOLED kijelző. A hagyományos IPS panelek a nyomába sem érnek az általa megjelenített kép minőségének.

A Samsung Galaxy A6+ fő erényei az OLED kijelző és a hosszú üzemidő. A karcsú designnak és sima működésű rendszernek hála remek középkategóriás okostelefonhoz juthatnak az érdeklődők.

A 370 eurós (~$425; nemzetközi verzió: ~$350) ajánlott árával a Galaxy A6+ nem esik éppen az "ajánlott" kategóriába. Mivel azonban egyes online boltok már most 300 euró (~$350) alatt kínálják a készüléket, így ez jelenleg az egyik legjobb okostelefon az alacsonyabb árszegmensben.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 - 06/26/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Váz
89%
Billentyűzet
69 / 75 → 92%
Érintőpad
87%
Csatlakoztathatóság
41 / 60 → 69%
Súly
89%
Akkumulátor
97%
Kijelző
92%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
27 / 63 → 42%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
48 / 70 → 69%
Hőmérséklet
96%
Zaj
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
72%
Átlag
74%
84%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus (2018) Smartphone rövid értékelés
Mike Wobker, 2018-07- 6 (Update: 2018-07- 6)