C 2018
Notebookcheck

Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018) Smartphone rövid értékelés

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Tanja Hinum (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 07/04/2018
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Éjjel és nappal. A Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018) egy sikkes középkategóriás okostelefon, amely sok plusz pontot tud begyűjteni az 5.6 colos Super AMOLED kijelzőjével, valamint két 16 MP-es kamerájával. Cikkünkből kiderül, hogy ez az Android okostelefon nagyon jól használható, de van pár hiányossága.

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Galaxy Széria)
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memória
3072 MB 
Kijelző
5.6 hüvelyk 18.5:9, 1480 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, kapacitív, Super AMOLED, 16 millió szín, fényes: igen
Háttértár
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22.8 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm-es audio jack, Kártyaolvasó: microSD, max. 256 GB, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: mozgásszenzor, ujjlenyomat olvasó, közelségérzékelő, Wi-Fi Direct, USB OTG, Smart Ready, ANT+
Hálózat
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, ​900, ​1800, ​1900 MHz), UMTS (850, ​900, ​1900, ​2100 MHz), LTE Cat.6 (sávok: 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40), letöltés: max. 300 Mb/s, feltöltés: max. 50 Mb/s, feji SAR 0.467 W/kg, test-SAR 1.386 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.7 x 149.9 x 70.9
Akkumulátor
3000 mAh Lítium-Ion
Operációs rendszer
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/1.7, 4608x3456 felbontású fotók, 1920x1080/30 FPS-es videók
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/1.9, 4608x3456 felbontású fotók, 1920x1080/30 FPS-es videók
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: 1 hangszóró a bal felső részen, Billentyűzet: virtuális, moduláris töltő, USB kábel (USB-A / micro USB-B), fejhallgató, SIM tű, quick start útmutató, Samsung Experience 9.0, 24 Hónap Garancia, fanless
Súly
162 g, Tápegység: 30 g
Ár
309 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
310 MBit/s ∼100% +158%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
251 MBit/s ∼81% +109%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s ∼78% +102%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼69% +78%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=279)
199 MBit/s ∼64% +66%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
120 MBit/s ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s ∼17% -55%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
311 MBit/s ∼100% +153%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼90% +128%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=279)
195 MBit/s ∼63% +59%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
167 MBit/s ∼54% +36%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s ∼48% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
123 MBit/s ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼18% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Entire route
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Entire route
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Bridge
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Bridge
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Turning point
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Entire route
Garmin Edge 500: Entire route
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
445
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 481 cd/m² Átlag: 458.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.26 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 93 %
Centrumban: 453 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.07
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
Super AMOLED, 1480x720, 5.6
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Screen
26%
9%
-131%
27%
-15%
Brightness middle
453
539
19%
454
0%
458
1%
761
68%
620
37%
Brightness
459
542
18%
463
1%
473
3%
723
58%
612
33%
Brightness Distribution
93
93
0%
86
-8%
88
-5%
90
-3%
96
3%
Black Level *
0.51
0.69
0.57
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.6
1.6
38%
2
23%
7.1
-173%
2.4
8%
3.46
-33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.2
2.6
72%
5.3
42%
14.5
-58%
5.2
43%
7.88
14%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
1.5
6%
1.7
-6%
10.5
-556%
1.8
-13%
3.9
-144%
Gamma
2.07 106%
2.28 96%
2.1 105%
2.28 96%
2.21 100%
2.073 106%
CCT
6356 102%
6422 101%
6394 102%
8951 73%
6312 103%
7230 90%
Contrast
898
1103
1088

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 238.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8677 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
46779 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
60603 Points ∼83% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
47339 Points ∼65% +1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points ∼91% +42%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
71635 Points ∼98% +53%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
60490 Points ∼83% +29%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (44191 - 47339, n=8)
45944 Points ∼63% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 250848, n=366)
72912 Points ∼100% +56%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
61794 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
61811 Points ∼55% 0%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
82343 Points ∼74% +33%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
90347 Points ∼81% +46%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
76178 Points ∼68% +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (61794 - 62758, n=4)
62047 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=145)
111758 Points ∼100% +81%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3809 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4060 Points ∼83% +7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3722 Points ∼76% -2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points ∼100% +29%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
4875 Points ∼99% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4905 Points ∼100% +29%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3722 - 3889, n=6)
3800 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6998 - 9868, n=233)
4440 Points ∼90% +17%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
4878 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5035 Points ∼86% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
4920 Points ∼84% +1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points ∼100% +21%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5712 Points ∼97% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
5801 Points ∼99% +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3691 - 5006, n=8)
4746 Points ∼81% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (4147 - 13211, n=396)
4801 Points ∼82% -2%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
732 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
659 Points ∼71% -10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
10 Points ∼1% -99%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points ∼87% +10%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
925 Points ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
722 Points ∼78% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (10 - 795, n=8)
618 Points ∼67% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=471)
680 Points ∼74% -7%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
533 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1528 Points ∼94% +187%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
533 Points ∼33% 0%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points ∼62% +90%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1523 Points ∼94% +186%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1017 Points ∼63% +91%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (511 - 534, n=8)
527 Points ∼32% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15875, n=471)
1622 Points ∼100% +204%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
1096 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1508 Points ∼100% +38%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1265 Points ∼84% +15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points ∼69% -5%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1213 Points ∼80% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
961 Points ∼64% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1086 - 1362, n=8)
1231 Points ∼82% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=471)
1171 Points ∼78% +7%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
2201 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
2593 Points ∼74% +18%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2368 Points ∼68% +8%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points ∼100% +59%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3249 Points ∼93% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3236 Points ∼93% +47%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (2127 - 2368, n=8)
2236 Points ∼64% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=471)
2367 Points ∼68% +8%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
985 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1408 Points ∼92% +43%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
353 Points ∼23% -64%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points ∼86% +33%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1535 Points ∼100% +56%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1229 Points ∼80% +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (353 - 1022, n=8)
920 Points ∼60% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=475)
1185 Points ∼77% +20%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2371 Points ∼57%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3763 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3316 Points ∼79%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (2332 - 2371, n=3)
2357 Points ∼56%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14417, n=170)
4186 Points ∼100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3741 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3777 Points ∼86% +1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points ∼100% +17%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
4011 Points ∼92% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4292 Points ∼98% +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3704 - 3777, n=5)
3728 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 11598, n=220)
4163 Points ∼95% +11%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
732 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
736 Points ∼60% +1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points ∼76% +27%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
822 Points ∼67% +12%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
870 Points ∼71% +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (726 - 736, n=5)
732 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=221)
1229 Points ∼100% +68%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
1709 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1713 Points ∼80% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1522 Points ∼71% -11%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points ∼100% +25%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1822 Points ∼85% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2038 Points ∼96% +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1522 - 1735, n=8)
1676 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 4183, n=325)
1588 Points ∼74% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
211 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
710 Points ∼63% +236%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
199 Points ∼18% -6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points ∼34% +80%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
721 Points ∼64% +242%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
379 Points ∼34% +80%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (185 - 253, n=8)
221 Points ∼20% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5220, n=325)
1124 Points ∼100% +433%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
262 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
816 Points ∼76% +211%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
247 Points ∼23% -6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points ∼43% +77%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
833 Points ∼77% +218%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
463 Points ∼43% +77%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (231 - 312, n=8)
274 Points ∼25% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=333)
1075 Points ∼100% +310%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
1705 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1752 Points ∼82% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1535 Points ∼72% -10%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points ∼100% +25%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1802 Points ∼85% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2058 Points ∼97% +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1522 - 1705, n=8)
1648 Points ∼77% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4150, n=356)
1484 Points ∼70% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
264 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1053 Points ∼69% +299%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
278 Points ∼18% +5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points ∼47% +175%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1258 Points ∼82% +377%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
732 Points ∼48% +177%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (244 - 407, n=8)
331 Points ∼22% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (104 - 8312, n=356)
1527 Points ∼100% +478%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
325 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1155 Points ∼86% +255%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
340 Points ∼25% +5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points ∼63% +161%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1348 Points ∼100% +315%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
854 Points ∼63% +163%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (301 - 490, n=8)
402 Points ∼30% +24%
Average of class Smartphone (127 - 6378, n=364)
1304 Points ∼97% +301%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
6184 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13057 Points ∼77% +111%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12955 Points ∼76% +109%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points ∼100% +176%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
12845 Points ∼75% +108%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
15593 Points ∼91% +152%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (6184 - 12955, n=8)
11907 Points ∼70% +93%
Average of class Smartphone (7095 - 36762, n=511)
12516 Points ∼73% +102%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
5376 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13314 Points ∼72% +148%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
7456 Points ∼40% +39%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points ∼72% +147%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
18449 Points ∼100% +243%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13219 Points ∼72% +146%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (5376 - 7793, n=8)
7092 Points ∼38% +32%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 160199, n=511)
16923 Points ∼92% +215%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
5537 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13256 Points ∼79% +139%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
8318 Points ∼49% +50%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points ∼83% +152%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
16818 Points ∼100% +204%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13682 Points ∼81% +147%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (5537 - 8550, n=8)
7787 Points ∼46% +41%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=512)
14348 Points ∼85% +159%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
12 fps ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
34 fps ∼100% +183%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼35% 0%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps ∼68% +92%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
30 fps ∼88% +150%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
23 fps ∼68% +92%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (12 - 12, n=8)
12 fps ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=537)
29.5 fps ∼87% +146%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
19 fps ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
33 fps ∼100% +74%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼36% -37%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps ∼67% +16%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
28 fps ∼85% +47%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
17 fps ∼52% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (11 - 20, n=8)
17.3 fps ∼52% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=540)
24.2 fps ∼73% +27%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
5.4 fps ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼95% +178%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼32% -6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps ∼62% +81%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
14 fps ∼89% +159%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.9 fps ∼63% +83%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (4.9 - 5.4, n=8)
5.11 fps ∼32% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 115, n=459)
15.8 fps ∼100% +193%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
10 fps ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼98% +50%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼33% -49%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps ∼63% -4%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
13 fps ∼85% +30%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.4 fps ∼61% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (4.5 - 10, n=8)
8.5 fps ∼56% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=462)
15.3 fps ∼100% +53%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3.2 fps ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9.1 fps ∼68% +184%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.3 fps ∼25% +3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps ∼48% +100%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
9.8 fps ∼73% +206%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.5 fps ∼49% +103%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1.7 - 3.3, n=8)
3.03 fps ∼23% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 69.3, n=324)
13.4 fps ∼100% +319%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
6.9 fps ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9 fps ∼68% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.2 fps ∼24% -54%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps ∼47% -9%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
9.4 fps ∼71% +36%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.2 fps ∼47% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (2.8 - 7.4, n=8)
6.05 fps ∼45% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=326)
13.3 fps ∼100% +93%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
2 fps ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼56% +160%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼20% -5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼38% +75%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5.6 fps ∼60% +180%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.5 fps ∼38% +75%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1.8 - 2, n=8)
1.913 fps ∼21% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 40, n=254)
9.31 fps ∼100% +366%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
4 fps ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼62% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼23% -52%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼41% -12%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5.3 fps ∼63% +33%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.4 fps ∼40% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1.7 - 4, n=8)
3.31 fps ∼39% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 50, n=257)
8.44 fps ∼100% +111%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7880, ARM Mali-T830 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 7X HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=394)
35.4 Points ∼100% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
32.222 Points ∼91% +54%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
27.971 Points ∼79% +34%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.837 Points ∼76% +29%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
25.972 Points ∼73% +24%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (20.7 - 26.4, n=8)
23.9 Points ∼68% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
23.097 Points ∼65% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
20.877 Points ∼59%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=530)
5305 Points ∼100% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
5256 Points ∼99% +41%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
5011 Points ∼94% +34%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
4560 Points ∼86% +22%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points ∼83% +18%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
4424 Points ∼83% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3721 - 4968, n=8)
4164 Points ∼78% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
3739 Points ∼70%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
11807.6 ms * ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=549)
11710 ms * ∼99% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
10895 ms * ∼92% +8%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
9796.9 ms * ∼83% +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (6784 - 11916, n=8)
9155 ms * ∼78% +22%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8741.5 ms * ∼74% +26%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
6820.9 ms * ∼58% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
6442.4 ms * ∼55% +45%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
112 Points ∼100% +26%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
108 Points ∼96% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=264)
106 Points ∼95% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
89 Points ∼79% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
89 Points ∼79%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points ∼77% -3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
75 Points ∼67% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (64 - 91, n=8)
74.6 Points ∼67% -16%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018Samsung Galaxy A5 2017Samsung Galaxy J7 2017BQ Aquaris X ProMotorola Moto G6 PlusXiaomi Redmi 5 PlusAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-9%
-10%
18%
130%
51%
12%
2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
55.98 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-15%
63.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
49.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-24%
62.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
59.46
-9%
46.3 (3.4 - 87.1, n=106)
-29%
44.7 (3.4 - 87.1, n=301)
-32%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
76.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
78.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-3%
83.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
84.38
4%
65.5 (8.2 - 96.5, n=106)
-20%
63 (8.2 - 96.5, n=301)
-23%
Random Write 4KB
10.68
12.13
14%
10.54
-1%
12.07
13%
62.76
488%
7.1
-34%
18.1 (0.75 - 77.3, n=145)
69%
14.8 (0.14 - 164, n=580)
39%
Random Read 4KB
24.54
22.41
-9%
25.86
5%
37.97
55%
58.39
138%
79.5
224%
35.9 (3.59 - 117, n=145)
46%
36.4 (1.59 - 173, n=580)
48%
Sequential Write 256KB
100.64
77.1
-23%
52.98
-47%
139.63
39%
216.09
115%
194.5
93%
93.7 (14.8 - 189, n=145)
-7%
75.8 (2.99 - 242, n=580)
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB
208.44
182.03
-13%
198.47
-5%
270.46
30%
286.64
38%
270
30%
229 (25.8 - 440, n=145)
10%
222 (12.1 - 895, n=580)
7%
Arena of Valor
 BeállításokÉrték
 high HD26 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
összehasonlítva
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (min)
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2
26
   ...
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
 630, Adreno 508
30
Motorola Moto G6
 450, Adreno 506
30
   ...
Razer Phone 2017 (max)
 835, Adreno 540
61
PUBG Mobile
 BeállításokÉrték
 Balanced13 fps
Max. terhelés
 28.1 °C28 °C27.7 °C 
 29.3 °C28.4 °C27.9 °C 
 29 °C27.9 °C27.7 °C 
Maximum: 29.3 °C
Átlag: 28.2 °C
27.5 °C27.5 °C27.1 °C
28.1 °C28.2 °C27.8 °C
27.6 °C28 °C28.1 °C
Maximum: 28.2 °C
Átlag: 27.8 °C
Tápegység (max.)  23.6 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.236.92532.938.73137.236.94031.737.95039.6376328.335.48027.332.910026.93212526.738.81602443.220020.947.225020.951.331519.556.240018.563.550017.566.863017.569.680015.772.8100015.872.4125016.675.6160015.872200015.471.9250015.574.231501671.2400015.880.750001679.9630016.372.8800016.372.71000016.271.41250016.465.51600016.463.2SPL28.687N1.167.8median 16.4median 71.2Delta2.17.831.641.125.44025.336.732.93633.635.631.630.628.432.92733.820.841.72244.421.348.420.850.521.256.619.462.519.566.217.766.117.974.217.877.317.374.317.473.816.771.817.269.318.269.517.966.517.661.417.755.817.854.517.959.918.152.218.249.530831.350.1median 17.9median 61.41.39.533.332.438.23534.145.534.934.343.336.928.627.925.825.524.224.32130.52141.520.150.119.955.818.260.417.964.517.667.916.472.916.572.715.875.315.474.715.174.115.273.815.274.615.177.715.17615.178.215.176.415.27115.267.315.360.715.144.427.986.9170median 15.4median 711.810.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A6 2018Samsung Galaxy A5 2017Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0 / 0.27 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.81 / 1.26 / 1.3 Watt
Terhelés midlight 2.87 / 4.82 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
8%
31%
-28%
-13%
-73%
-18%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
0.81
0.64
21%
0.39
52%
0.67
17%
0.5
38%
0.7
14%
0.71 (0.37 - 1.18, n=8)
12%
0.884 (0.2 - 3.4, n=613)
-9%
Idle Average *
1.26
1.36
-8%
1.06
16%
1.7
-35%
1.78
-41%
2.8
-122%
1.909 (0.78 - 4.65, n=8)
-52%
1.725 (0.6 - 6.2, n=612)
-37%
Idle Maximum *
1.3
1.4
-8%
1.08
17%
1.78
-37%
1.81
-39%
3.4
-162%
1.995 (0.84 - 4.74, n=8)
-53%
1.997 (0.74 - 6.6, n=613)
-54%
Load Average *
2.87
2.53
12%
1.82
37%
4.42
-54%
3.3
-15%
4.2
-46%
3.02 (1.52 - 5.75, n=8)
-5%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=607)
-40%
Load Maximum *
4.82
3.63
25%
3.21
33%
6.3
-31%
5.14
-7%
7.2
-49%
4.42 (2.75 - 6.97, n=8)
8%
5.7 (1.2 - 14.2, n=607)
-18%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
26h 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 28min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
5h 01min
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
39%
43%
-2%
6%
-18%
Reader / Idle
1616
2418
50%
1950
21%
1840
14%
1846
14%
H.264
868
984
13%
1096
26%
644
-26%
542
-38%
WiFi v1.3
608
843
39%
904
49%
730
20%
702
15%
497
-18%
Load
301
467
55%
525
74%
254
-16%
404
34%

Pro

+ sikkes design, kézbe illő
+ bővíthető belső tárhely
+ Android 8.0
+ dual-SIM + microSD
+ világos, jó színhűségű kijelző
+ nem melegszik működés közben
+ kiváló üzemidő

Kontra

- nem por-, vagy vízálló
- micro USB 2.0 az USB-C helyett
- lassú Wi-Fi
- PWM vibrálás
- nem támogatja a gyorstöltést
- középszerű teljesítmény
In review: Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018). Review device provided courtesy of: notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018). Review device provided courtesy of: notebooksbilliger.de

A Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018) egy jó középkategóriás okostelefon, amelynek elég erős mezőnyben kell helytállnia. Van egy sor előnye, de éppen annyi hátránya is.

A Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018) egy jó középkategóriás okostelefon, amely több téren is rosszabbul teljesít, mint elődje, a Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017).

A Galaxy A6 (2018) jó pontokat szerzett designjával, világos és jól kalibrált kijelzőjével, valamint remek üzemidejével. Ezen felül naprakész Android-ot (8.0 Oreo), valódi dual-SIM képességet, és bővíthető háttértárat (a belső tárhely kiegészíthető microSD kártyával) kapott. A kameramodul nem teljesít túl jól: a 16 MP-es fő kamera elfogadható képeket készít nappali fényben, de sötétebb környezetben küszködik.

A 309 (~$362) eurós Galaxy A6-nak (2018) van pár hiányossága. A microUSB csatlakozó kifejezetten elavult. A Wi-Fi lassú, nincs IP minősítése, és lassan töltődik. Az Exynos 7870 lapkakészlet és az ARM Mali T830 MP2 videochip több mint elég erőt ad a Galaxy A6-nak (2018) a mindennapi feladatokhoz. Játékhoz azonban messze nem elég erős. Mindent egybevetve, elődje, a Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) jobb választás, ha nincs szükségünk dual-SIM képességre. Nagyobb teljesítményt nyújt, alacsonyabb áron.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 - 06/28/2018 v6
Manuel Masiero

Váz
86%
Billentyűzet
68 / 75 → 91%
Érintőpad
88%
Csatlakoztathatóság
42 / 60 → 69%
Súly
91%
Akkumulátor
94%
Kijelző
87%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
14 / 63 → 23%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
46 / 70 → 65%
Hőmérséklet
96%
Zaj
100%
Audio
72 / 91 → 79%
Camera
68%
Átlag
73%
83%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018) Smartphone rövid értékelés
Manuel Masiero, 2018-07- 4 (Update: 2018-07- 4)