Notebookcheck

Nokia 8 Smartphone rövid értékelés

Manuel Masiero (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 10/25/2017
Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Három lencse. A Nokia 8-cal a HMD Global most a prémium szegmensben is feltámasztani igyekszik a legendás finn márkát. Az 580 euró (~$682; $565 egyes amerikai online boltokban) körüli, mérsékelt árú készülék képében egy jól összerakott és jól konfigurált 5.3 inches telefont kapunk, amelynek kettős kamerarendszere egy eddig nem látott funkcióval is rendelkezik.

Nokia 8
Processzor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998)
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 540
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPPDDR4X
Kijelző
5.3 hüvelyk 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel 554 PPI, kapacitív, QHD, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, 2.5D Glass, fényes: igen
Háttértár
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 49.9 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 3.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm-es audio jack, Kártyaolvasó: microSD, max. 256 GB, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: közelségérzékelő, gyorsulásmérő, e-iránytű, giroszenzor, ujjlenyomat olvasó, Hall-szenzor, barométer, ANT+, Android Beam, DLNA, USB-OTG
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat.9 (sávok: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41), letöltés: max. 450 MBit/s, feltöltés: max. 50 MBit/s, feji: SAR 0.711 W/kg, testi: SAR 1.330 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.9 x 151.5 x 73.7
Akkumulátor
3090 mAh Lítium-Ion, Beszédidő 2G (gyártói adat): 23.5 h, Beszédidő 3G (gyártói adat): 23.5 h, Készenlét 2G (gyártói adat): 208.8 h, Készenlét 3G (gyártói adat): 208.8 h
Operációs rendszer
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix dual 13 MP, f/2.0, 1,12 µm, látószög: 76.9°, dual-tone vaku, OIS, PDAF, IR távmérő
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0, 1.12 µm, látószög: 78.4˚, PDAF, kijelző vaku
További jellegzetességek
Billentyűzet: virtuális, töltő, töltő-/adatkábel, headset, quick start útmutató, SIM tű, 24 Hónap Garancia, fanless
Súly
160 g, Tápegység: 35 g
Ár
579 (~$565 egyes amerikai online boltokban) Euró
Hivatkozások

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
915 MBit/s ∼100% +289%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
394 MBit/s ∼43% +68%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
371 MBit/s ∼41% +58%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
329 MBit/s ∼36% +40%
Nokia 8
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
235 MBit/s ∼26%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 MBit/s ∼100% +177%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 MBit/s ∼98% +172%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
539 MBit/s ∼83% +129%
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
354 MBit/s ∼54% +51%
Nokia 8
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
235 MBit/s ∼36%
Nokia 8: total route
Nokia 8: total route
Nokia 8: turning point
Nokia 8: turning point
Nokia 8: bridge
Nokia 8: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: total route
Garmin Edge 500: total route
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
708
cd/m²
716
cd/m²
691
cd/m²
679
cd/m²
735
cd/m²
709
cd/m²
702
cd/m²
721
cd/m²
704
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 735 cd/m² Átlag: 707.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.39 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 92 %
Centrumban: 735 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 930:1 (Fekete: 0.79 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 8.3 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.24
Nokia 8
IPS, 2560x1440, 5.3
OnePlus 5
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
HTC U11
Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
Apple iPhone 8
IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.7
Screen
30%
34%
26%
39%
Brightness
707
431
-39%
472
-33%
564
-20%
580
-18%
Brightness Distribution
92
93
1%
90
-2%
94
2%
91
-1%
Black Level *
0.79
0.33
58%
0.44
44%
Contrast
930
1461
57%
1373
48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.7
1.6
76%
3.2
52%
2.7
60%
1.2
82%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.3
1.7
80%
2.2
73%
3.1
63%
1.6
81%
Gamma
2.24 107%
2.25 107%
2.22 108%
2.15 112%
2.25 107%
CCT
8906 73%
6329 103%
6581 99%
6335 103%
6688 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz17 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8499 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms rise
↘ 9.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.2 ms rise
↘ 19.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.4 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8
177018 Points ∼78%
OnePlus 5
177156 Points ∼78% 0%
HTC U11
175032 Points ∼77% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
171884 Points ∼75% -3%
Apple iPhone 8
204270 Points ∼90% +15%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 8
6959 Points ∼68%
OnePlus 5
6579 Points ∼64% -5%
HTC U11
6828 Points ∼66% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5370 Points ∼52% -23%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 8
8282 Points ∼97%
OnePlus 5
7826 Points ∼92% -6%
HTC U11
8295 Points ∼97% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6035 Points ∼71% -27%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 8
1262 Points ∼74%
OnePlus 5
1287 Points ∼76% +2%
HTC U11
1221 Points ∼72% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1156 Points ∼68% -8%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8
5958 Points ∼64%
OnePlus 5
6144 Points ∼66% +3%
HTC U11
5976 Points ∼65% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6096 Points ∼66% +2%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 8
3540 Points ∼80%
OnePlus 5
4423 Points ∼100% +25%
HTC U11
2085 Points ∼47% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3039 Points ∼69% -14%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 8
5671 Points ∼55%
OnePlus 5
5902 Points ∼57% +4%
HTC U11
5570 Points ∼54% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5386 Points ∼52% -5%
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 8
3505 Points ∼92%
OnePlus 5
3790 Points ∼100% +8%
HTC U11
3034 Points ∼80% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3277 Points ∼86% -7%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
8005 Points ∼93%
HTC U11
8281 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S8
8490 Points ∼99%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8
6479 Points ∼26%
OnePlus 5
6799 Points ∼27% +5%
HTC U11
6443 Points ∼26% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6711 Points ∼27% +4%
Apple iPhone 8
10380 Points ∼41% +60%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8
1924 Points ∼32%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points ∼33% +3%
HTC U11
1906 Points ∼32% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1997 Points ∼34% +4%
Apple iPhone 8
4162 Points ∼70% +116%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8
3010 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 5
3026 Points ∼98% +1%
HTC U11
2841 Points ∼92% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2494 Points ∼81% -17%
Apple iPhone 8
1989 Points ∼65% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8
3894 Points ∼72%
OnePlus 5
3757 Points ∼70% -4%
HTC U11
3883 Points ∼72% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3472 Points ∼64% -11%
Apple iPhone 8
2581 Points ∼48% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 8
3655 Points ∼94%
OnePlus 5
3566 Points ∼92% -2%
HTC U11
3590 Points ∼92% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3194 Points ∼82% -13%
Apple iPhone 8
2421 Points ∼62% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8
3002 Points ∼97%
OnePlus 5
3012 Points ∼98% 0%
HTC U11
2832 Points ∼92% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2440 Points ∼79% -19%
Apple iPhone 8
1774 Points ∼58% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8
5818 Points ∼75%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points ∼62% -18%
HTC U11
5877 Points ∼76% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4923 Points ∼64% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 8
4814 Points ∼97%
OnePlus 5
4219 Points ∼85% -12%
HTC U11
4744 Points ∼95% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4015 Points ∼81% -17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8
20951 Points ∼29%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points ∼27% -7%
HTC U11
20140 Points ∼28% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8
21543 Points ∼30% +3%
Apple iPhone 8
24131 Points ∼34% +15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8
56531 Points ∼12%
OnePlus 5
58001 Points ∼13% +3%
HTC U11
55725 Points ∼12% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8
36347 Points ∼8% -36%
Apple iPhone 8
112424 Points ∼25% +99%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8
40968 Points ∼21%
OnePlus 5
40229 Points ∼20% -2%
HTC U11
40014 Points ∼20% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8
31532 Points ∼16% -23%
Apple iPhone 8
62006 Points ∼31% +51%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 8
99 fps ∼7%
OnePlus 5
115 fps ∼8% +16%
HTC U11
91 fps ∼7% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S8
121 fps ∼9% +22%
Apple iPhone 8
161.3 fps ∼12% +63%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 8
54 fps ∼5%
OnePlus 5
60 fps ∼6% +11%
HTC U11
58 fps ∼6% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S8
60 fps ∼6% +11%
Apple iPhone 8
119.8 fps ∼12% +122%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 8
51 fps ∼9%
OnePlus 5
61 fps ∼11% +20%
HTC U11
51 fps ∼9% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
62 fps ∼11% +22%
Apple iPhone 8
70.8 fps ∼13% +39%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 8
31 fps ∼5%
OnePlus 5
56 fps ∼10% +81%
HTC U11
29 fps ∼5% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8
41 fps ∼7% +32%
Apple iPhone 8
114.5 fps ∼20% +269%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8
36 fps ∼9%
OnePlus 5
42 fps ∼10% +17%
HTC U11
33 fps ∼8% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S8
24 fps ∼6% -33%
Apple iPhone 8
54 fps ∼13% +50%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8
17 fps ∼4%
OnePlus 5
41 fps ∼10% +141%
HTC U11
15 fps ∼4% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8
23 fps ∼6% +35%
Apple iPhone 8
109.7 fps ∼26% +545%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8
24 fps ∼7%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼7% +4%
HTC U11
24 fps ∼7% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
25 fps ∼7% +4%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8
13 fps ∼0%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼1% +92%
HTC U11
13 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8
13 fps ∼0% 0%

Legend

 
Nokia 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone 8
206.7 Points ∼100% +226%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
71.6 Points ∼35% +13%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
69.51 Points ∼34% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
65.846 Points ∼32% +4%
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
63.365 Points ∼31%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points ∼100% +207%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
12941 Points ∼38% +16%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
11945 Points ∼35% +7%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
11781 Points ∼34% +6%
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
11131 Points ∼33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
3159.8 ms * ∼100%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
2760.3 ms * ∼87% +13%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
2621.7 ms * ∼83% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
1886.6 ms * ∼60% +40%
Apple iPhone 8
730.8 ms * ∼23% +77%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 8
359 Points ∼100% +106%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
194 Points ∼54% +11%
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
174 Points ∼48%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
162 Points ∼45% -7%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
161 Points ∼45% -7%

* ... smaller is better

Nokia 8OnePlus 5HTC U11Samsung Galaxy S8
AndroBench 3-5
10%
67%
-1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
51.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
46.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-10%
53.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
4%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
68.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-10%
63.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
14.57
19.3
32%
79.97
449%
15.25
5%
Random Read 4KB
145.73
141
-3%
91.45
-37%
127.17
-13%
Sequential Write 256KB
199.15
201.5
1%
206.41
4%
193.23
-3%
Sequential Read 256KB
680.39
748
10%
717.33
5%
792.86
17%
Dead Trigger 2
 BeállításokÉrték
 high60 fps
összehasonlítva
Lenovo Moto E3 (min)
 MT6735P, Mali-T720
26
   ...
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
 835, Adreno 540
60
OnePlus 5
 835, Adreno 540
60
Nokia 8
 835, Adreno 540
60
Sony Xperia XZ1
 835, Adreno 540
60
   ...
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (max)
 835, Adreno 540
60
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 BeállításokÉrték
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Max. terhelés
 39.2 °C38.1 °C43.2 °C 
 39.7 °C39.5 °C45.1 °C 
 39.4 °C38.1 °C40.6 °C 
Maximum: 45.1 °C
Átlag: 40.3 °C
35.9 °C36.9 °C38.3 °C
36.6 °C37 °C38 °C
36.3 °C37.4 °C38.1 °C
Maximum: 38.3 °C
Átlag: 37.2 °C
Tápegység (max.)  29.9 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.629.52525.435.93125.3304032.930.65033.634.46331.636.68028.437.41002741.412520.8411602243.720021.346.125020.853.331521.256.440019.460.150019.563.363017.764.480017.961.7100017.867.3125017.373.6160017.474.1200016.775.8250017.278.6315018.281.8400017.982.4500017.686.6630017.783.8800017.879.51000017.977.91250018.1791600018.269.6SPL3091.6N1.382median 17.9Nokia 8median 69.6Delta1.311.631.639.125.437.625.336.932.940.833.635.231.633.328.433.82733.520.842.82250.821.351.520.849.821.253.919.45619.558.717.761.617.962.917.866.217.368.217.468.416.768.517.267.318.26817.969.817.668.817.767.517.861.717.959.118.160.618.256.23078.41.343.6median 17.9Apple iPhone 8median 61.61.37.531.635.125.433.525.334.832.93433.629.431.629.628.424.92731.220.834.72239.821.348.320.855.321.259.519.462.219.567.117.77017.973.617.874.217.373.217.472.716.773.217.272.118.269.717.96917.666.317.766.917.86717.951.618.145.218.247.73082.41.354.8median 17.9Samsung Galaxy S8median 66.91.311.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Nokia 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy S8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.44 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.04 / 0.5 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.86 / 2.13 / 2.16 Watt
Terhelés midlight 4.65 / 9.99 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia 8
3090 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
Power Consumption
9%
11%
33%
29%
Idle Minimum *
0.86
0.73
15%
0.73
15%
0.78
9%
0.54
37%
Idle Average *
2.13
1.44
32%
1.96
8%
1.1
48%
1.63
23%
Idle Maximum *
2.16
1.5
31%
1.98
8%
1.16
46%
1.67
23%
Load Average *
4.65
6.91
-49%
4.82
-4%
4.15
11%
2.74
41%
Load Maximum *
9.99
8.51
15%
7.15
28%
5.12
49%
7.78
22%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
25h 06min
WiFi böngészés v1.3
10h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 13min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
3h 57min
Nokia 8
3090 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
Battery Runtime
-7%
-19%
10%
-6%
Reader / Idle
1506
1534
2%
1250
-17%
1667
11%
1629
8%
H.264
733
623
-15%
498
-32%
771
5%
698
-5%
WiFi v1.3
650
518
-20%
560
-14%
719
11%
585
-10%
Load
237
247
4%
212
-11%
264
11%
202
-15%

Pro

+ nagyon világos kijelző
+ jól összerakott
+ gyors lapkakészlet
+ tiszta Android 7.1.1
+ nagyon jó GPS
+ jó kamera
+ surround hanggal rögzített videók
+ USB 3.1 Gen.1
+ hosszú üzemidő
+ Quick Charge 3.0

Kontra

- nem por-/vízálló
- csak átlagos Wi-Fi sebesség
- nincs gigabites LTE
- viszonylag kevés LTE sáv
In review: Nokia 8 courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Nokia 8 courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

A Nokia 8 főbb erényei közé tartozik a remekül összerakott alumínium ház, és egy nagyon világos, 5.3 inches QHD kijelző. Ide sorolható még a remek Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 lapkakészlet is. Ez utóbbi, a 4 GB RAM és az Adreno 540 videochip társaságában kellően gyorssá teszi a rendszert. Ezen felül a telefon üzemideje jó, a Quick Charge 3.0-nak hála hamar fel is töltődik és egy igazán egyedi különlegességgel is rendelkezik: ez a "Bothie", egy 13 MP kamera, amely egyszerre képes fotózni és videót rögzíteni webkamerája és elsődleges kamerája segítségével, egy afféle osztott képernyős módban, egy kvázi "duplaszelfit" létrehozva. Ez 4K videókkal is működik, amely mellé még a kiváló Ozo 360 ° térhatású hangrögzítés képessége is társul, három mikrofonnal.

A HMD Global Nokia 8-a egy prémium okostelefon, amely majdnem mindenben eléggé elöl van, így joggal foglalhat helyet a vezető modellek, például az Apple iPhone 8 vagy a Samsung Galaxy S8 mellett. Elbírni azonban nem bír el az erős riválisokkal.

Ha a kamera innovatív különleges módját - amely valószínűleg tetszeni fog a kreatívoknak - figyelmen kívül is hagyjuk, a Nokia 8 akkor is egy remek okostelefon marad. Ugyanakkor néhány rossz döntés megakadályozza, hogy magasabb pontszámot kaphasson. Például, az IP67 minősítés (por- és vízállóság) elvárás lenne egy prémium készüléktől. Egy gyorsabb, több sávot kezelő LTE modul szintén nem ártott volna a telefonnak. Egyes sávok hiánya akadálya lehet annak, hogy a Nokia igazi világjáró legyen. A Wi-Fi sebessége sem lenyűgöző, főleg ebben a szegmensben.

Az általunk tesztelt, egy SIM-es változaton kívül a Nokia 8 elérhető dual-SIM változatban is. Ezen felül, egy 128 GB-os verzió is piacra kerül hamarosan, bár ezzel kapcsolatosan a Nokia német nyelvű oldalán egyelőre nem találtunk pontosabb információkat.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Nokia 8 - 10/19/2017 v6
Manuel Masiero

Váz
88%
Billentyűzet
71 / 75 → 94%
Érintőpad
90%
Csatlakoztathatóság
48 / 60 → 80%
Súly
91%
Akkumulátor
93%
Kijelző
83%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
64 / 63 → 100%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
68 / 70 → 98%
Hőmérséklet
85%
Zaj
100%
Audio
71 / 91 → 78%
Camera
75%
Átlag
79%
87%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Nokia 8 Smartphone rövid értékelés
Manuel Masiero, 2017-10-25 (Update: 2017-10-25)