Notebookcheck

Huawei P20 Pro Smartphone rövid értékelés

Daniel Schmidt (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 04/23/2018
Android ARM Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen

Csodálatos! A Huawei még magasabbra tette a lécet a mobil fotózásban a Leica tripla kamerával, miközben a P20 Pro a jelenlegi legjobban átgondolt csúcs okostelefon lett. Cikkünkből kiderül, hogy ez hogyan sikerült, és mivel veri meg a riválisokat a Huawei P20 Pro.

Huawei P20 Pro
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
Memória
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Kijelző
6.1 hüvelyk 18.7:9, 2240 x 1080 pixel 408 PPI, kapacitív, 10 pontos multitouch, OLED, HDR, fényes: igen
Háttértár
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 116 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audió csatlakozók: USB-C, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: közelségérzékelő, gyorsulásmérő, GPS, forgásszenzor, Hall- és G-szenzor, iránytű, OTG, Miracast, WiFi Direct, Infrared, BeiDou, QZSS
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1,800 and 1,900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (sávok: 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE Cat. 18 (FDD-sávok: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28 és 32; TDD: 34, 38, 39, 40 és 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.65 x 155 x 73.88
Akkumulátor
15.3 Wh, 4000 mAh Lítium-Polimer, 3.82 Volt, Beszédidő 3G (gyártói adat): 22 h, Készenlét 3G (gyártói adat): 421 h
Operációs rendszer
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 40 MPix + 20 MPix + 8 MPix Leica Triple Camera (AIS, Lightfusion, f/1.6-2.4, up to ISO 102400, 1/1.7 inches érzékelő, 1.55 µm pixelméret
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix (Lightfusion, f/2.0)
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: két hangszóró, Billentyűzet: virtuális, hálózati adapter, USB kábel, SIM tű, USB fejhallgató, USB-C / 3.5 mm jack adapter, Quick Start útmutató, tok, EMUI 8.1, 24 Hónap Garancia, IP67 víz- és porálló, Dual-VoLTE, NPU, SAR: 0.73 W/kg (fej), SAR: 1.22 W/kg (test), fanless
Súly
174 g, Tápegység: 103 g
Ár
899 Euró
Hivatkozások

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
939 MBit/s ∼100% +48%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 MBit/s ∼70% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼69% +3%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 MBit/s ∼68%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
386 MBit/s ∼41% -39%
HTC U11 Plus
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 MBit/s ∼37% -46%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
239 MBit/s ∼25% -62%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=270)
196 MBit/s ∼21% -69%
Huawei P10 Plus
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
40.8 MBit/s ∼4% -94%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
703 MBit/s ∼100% +61%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 MBit/s ∼92% +49%
HTC U11 Plus
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
583 MBit/s ∼83% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼74% +19%
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
456 MBit/s ∼65% +4%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
437 MBit/s ∼62%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
279 MBit/s ∼40% -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=270)
191 MBit/s ∼27% -56%
Huawei P10 Plus
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
128 MBit/s ∼18% -71%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Huawei P20 Pro
Huawei P20 Pro
Huawei P20 Pro
Huawei P20 Pro
Huawei P20 Pro
Huawei P20 Pro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Image taken in standard mode – 10 MP, Master AI
Image taken in standard mode – 10 MP, Master AI
Image taken with only the monochrome sensor – 20 MP
Image taken with the colour sensor – 40 MP
601
cd/m²
572
cd/m²
582
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
576
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 601 cd/m² Átlag: 577.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.62 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 95 %
Centrumban: 569 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.31
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
Huawei P10 Plus
LTPS, 2560x1440, 5.5
Apple iPhone X
Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Google Pixel 2 XL
P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6
LG V30
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
OnePlus 5T
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01
HTC U11 Plus
Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6
Screen
-38%
-4%
-38%
-64%
-136%
-39%
-55%
Brightness middle
569
568
0%
600
5%
565
-1%
415
-27%
432
-24%
425
-25%
361
-37%
Brightness
578
562
-3%
606
5%
571
-1%
420
-27%
428
-26%
423
-27%
356
-38%
Brightness Distribution
95
92
-3%
94
-1%
96
1%
87
-8%
87
-8%
92
-3%
90
-5%
Black Level *
0.43
0.21
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.3
2.4
-85%
1.2
8%
2.3
-77%
2.7
-108%
4.18
-222%
2.1
-62%
2.5
-92%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.1
3.8
-81%
3
-43%
4.8
-129%
4.3
-105%
8.53
-306%
3.4
-62%
5.3
-152%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
2.5
-56%
1.6
-0%
1.9
-19%
3.3
-106%
5.3
-231%
2.5
-56%
1.7
-6%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.37 93%
2.23 99%
2.16 102%
2.36 93%
2.33 94%
2.32 95%
2.21 100%
CCT
6401 102%
6779 96%
6707 97%
6332 103%
6787 96%
7487 87%
6455 101%
6580 99%
Contrast
1321
1719

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 238.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8801 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
179709 Points ∼81%
Huawei P10 Plus
138326 Points ∼62% -23%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points ∼80% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
222290 Points ∼100% +24%
Apple iPhone X
197851 Points ∼89% +10%
OnePlus 5T
172124 Points ∼77% -4%
HTC U11 Plus
183057 Points ∼82% +2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
166151 Points ∼75% -8%
LG V30
173749 Points ∼78% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (173653 - 179709, n=7)
177335 Points ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 232931, n=359)
72132 Points ∼32% -60%
AnTuTu v7
MEM (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
13795 Points ∼85%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
13626 Points ∼84% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
8612 Points ∼53% -38%
Apple iPhone X
11107 Points ∼69% -19%
OnePlus 5T
9027 Points ∼56% -35%
HTC U11 Plus
16148 Points ∼100% +17%
Google Pixel 2 XL
8630 Points ∼53% -37%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (9493 - 13795, n=5)
12771 Points ∼79% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2797 - 17441, n=138)
6490 Points ∼40% -53%
UX (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
45397 Points ∼79%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
44584 Points ∼77% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
57538 Points ∼100% +27%
Apple iPhone X
50699 Points ∼88% +12%
OnePlus 5T
46549 Points ∼81% +3%
HTC U11 Plus
43739 Points ∼76% -4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
43216 Points ∼75% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (28440 - 45397, n=5)
41478 Points ∼72% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (6403 - 66469, n=137)
26644 Points ∼46% -41%
GPU (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
77063 Points ∼81%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
81761 Points ∼86% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
92887 Points ∼98% +21%
Apple iPhone X
94618 Points ∼100% +23%
OnePlus 5T
85868 Points ∼91% +11%
HTC U11 Plus
84481 Points ∼89% +10%
Google Pixel 2 XL
80946 Points ∼86% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (68813 - 81761, n=5)
75621 Points ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3116 - 148790, n=138)
32577 Points ∼34% -58%
CPU (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
71704 Points ∼72%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
72307 Points ∼72% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
91540 Points ∼92% +28%
Apple iPhone X
99873 Points ∼100% +39%
OnePlus 5T
73371 Points ∼73% +2%
HTC U11 Plus
73074 Points ∼73% +2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
71862 Points ∼72% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (46027 - 72307, n=5)
65942 Points ∼66% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (7548 - 120510, n=138)
43157 Points ∼43% -40%
Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
207959 Points ∼81%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
212278 Points ∼83% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
250577 Points ∼98% +20%
Apple iPhone X
256297 Points ∼100% +23%
OnePlus 5T
214815 Points ∼84% +3%
HTC U11 Plus
217442 Points ∼85% +5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
204654 Points ∼80% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (152773 - 212278, n=5)
195813 Points ∼76% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=138)
109082 Points ∼43% -48%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
6982 Points ∼100%
Huawei P10 Plus
6157 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5319 Points ∼76% -24%
OnePlus 5T
6595 Points ∼94% -6%
HTC U11 Plus
6695 Points ∼96% -4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6994 Points ∼100% 0%
LG V30
5603 Points ∼80% -20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6293 - 7046, n=7)
6840 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 8601, n=226)
4431 Points ∼63% -37%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
8115 Points ∼95%
Huawei P10 Plus
7377 Points ∼86% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points ∼99% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5822 Points ∼68% -28%
OnePlus 5T
7739 Points ∼91% -5%
HTC U11 Plus
7964 Points ∼93% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
8258 Points ∼97% +2%
LG V30
6854 Points ∼80% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (8115 - 9326, n=7)
8536 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (4147 - 10571, n=389)
4739 Points ∼56% -42%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
1273 Points ∼76%
Huawei P10 Plus
1054 Points ∼63% -17%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points ∼73% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1109 Points ∼66% -13%
Apple iPhone X
1682 Points ∼100% +32%
OnePlus 5T
1329 Points ∼79% +4%
HTC U11 Plus
1159 Points ∼69% -9%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1186 Points ∼71% -7%
LG V30
1009 Points ∼60% -21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1091 - 1316, n=7)
1238 Points ∼74% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=466)
678 Points ∼40% -47%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
3725 Points ∼40%
Huawei P10 Plus
3438 Points ∼37% -8%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points ∼40% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6370 Points ∼69% +71%
Apple iPhone X
9248 Points ∼100% +148%
OnePlus 5T
6100 Points ∼66% +64%
HTC U11 Plus
6086 Points ∼66% +63%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6142 Points ∼66% +65%
LG V30
5949 Points ∼64% +60%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2231 - 4397, n=7)
3647 Points ∼39% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15875, n=466)
1622 Points ∼18% -56%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
4050 Points ∼98%
Huawei P10 Plus
3331 Points ∼80% -18%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2625 Points ∼63% -35%
Apple iPhone X
1219 Points ∼29% -70%
OnePlus 5T
3845 Points ∼93% -5%
HTC U11 Plus
3376 Points ∼82% -17%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2927 Points ∼71% -28%
LG V30
2091 Points ∼50% -48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2417 - 4276, n=7)
3855 Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=466)
1157 Points ∼28% -71%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
5965 Points ∼58%
Huawei P10 Plus
3572 Points ∼35% -40%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points ∼51% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6413 Points ∼62% +8%
Apple iPhone X
10281 Points ∼100% +72%
OnePlus 5T
5872 Points ∼57% -2%
HTC U11 Plus
5926 Points ∼58% -1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5914 Points ∼58% -1%
LG V30
4238 Points ∼41% -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3795 - 5965, n=7)
5301 Points ∼52% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=466)
2351 Points ∼23% -61%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
3271 Points ∼88%
Huawei P10 Plus
2563 Points ∼69% -22%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points ∼84% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3302 Points ∼88% +1%
Apple iPhone X
3737 Points ∼100% +14%
OnePlus 5T
3678 Points ∼98% +12%
HTC U11 Plus
3447 Points ∼92% +5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3351 Points ∼90% +2%
LG V30
2702 Points ∼72% -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2174 - 3374, n=7)
3092 Points ∼83% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=470)
1178 Points ∼32% -64%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
8025 Points ∼94%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6202 Points ∼72% -23%
OnePlus 5T
8000 Points ∼93% 0%
HTC U11 Plus
7946 Points ∼93% -1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
7568 Points ∼88% -6%
LG V30
8016 Points ∼94% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (8025 - 9015, n=5)
8540 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14417, n=164)
4116 Points ∼48% -49%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
6756 Points ∼66%
Huawei P10 Plus
6267 Points ∼61% -7%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points ∼66% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
8963 Points ∼87% +33%
Apple iPhone X
10255 Points ∼100% +52%
OnePlus 5T
6670 Points ∼65% -1%
HTC U11 Plus
6771 Points ∼66% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6253 Points ∼61% -7%
LG V30
6078 Points ∼59% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6557 - 6792, n=7)
6684 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 11598, n=214)
4120 Points ∼40% -39%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
1922 Points ∼45%
Huawei P10 Plus
1852 Points ∼43% -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points ∼45% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3776 Points ∼89% +96%
Apple iPhone X
4265 Points ∼100% +122%
OnePlus 5T
1962 Points ∼46% +2%
HTC U11 Plus
1935 Points ∼45% +1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1916 Points ∼45% 0%
LG V30
1900 Points ∼45% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1883 - 1922, n=7)
1900 Points ∼45% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=215)
1215 Points ∼28% -37%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
2926 Points ∼95%
Huawei P10 Plus
1679 Points ∼55% -43%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points ∼94% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2469 Points ∼80% -16%
Apple iPhone X
2361 Points ∼77% -19%
OnePlus 5T
3068 Points ∼100% +5%
HTC U11 Plus
3049 Points ∼99% +4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3028 Points ∼99% +3%
LG V30
2931 Points ∼96% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2582 - 2931, n=7)
2831 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 3669, n=319)
1572 Points ∼51% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
3017 Points ∼75%
Huawei P10 Plus
1767 Points ∼44% -41%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points ∼71% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3582 Points ∼89% +19%
Apple iPhone X
3463 Points ∼86% +15%
OnePlus 5T
4016 Points ∼100% +33%
HTC U11 Plus
3987 Points ∼99% +32%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3872 Points ∼96% +28%
LG V30
3903 Points ∼97% +29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2844 - 3040, n=7)
2991 Points ∼74% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5220, n=319)
1103 Points ∼27% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
2996 Points ∼80%
Huawei P10 Plus
1747 Points ∼46% -42%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points ∼76% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3256 Points ∼87% +9%
Apple iPhone X
3138 Points ∼84% +5%
OnePlus 5T
3758 Points ∼100% +25%
HTC U11 Plus
3732 Points ∼99% +25%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3646 Points ∼97% +22%
LG V30
3635 Points ∼97% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2850 - 2999, n=7)
2953 Points ∼79% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=327)
1054 Points ∼28% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
2885 Points ∼94%
Huawei P10 Plus
1662 Points ∼54% -42%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points ∼94% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2496 Points ∼81% -13%
OnePlus 5T
3031 Points ∼99% +5%
HTC U11 Plus
3071 Points ∼100% +6%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2995 Points ∼98% +4%
LG V30
2808 Points ∼91% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1906 - 2896, n=7)
2708 Points ∼88% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 3642, n=350)
1471 Points ∼48% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
3335 Points ∼55%
Huawei P10 Plus
2469 Points ∼41% -26%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points ∼55% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4637 Points ∼77% +39%
OnePlus 5T
5791 Points ∼96% +74%
HTC U11 Plus
6060 Points ∼100% +82%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5856 Points ∼97% +76%
LG V30
5895 Points ∼97% +77%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1954 - 3734, n=7)
3289 Points ∼54% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (104 - 8312, n=350)
1499 Points ∼25% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
3223 Points ∼65%
Huawei P10 Plus
2229 Points ∼45% -31%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points ∼65% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3895 Points ∼78% +21%
OnePlus 5T
4816 Points ∼97% +49%
HTC U11 Plus
4982 Points ∼100% +55%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4831 Points ∼97% +50%
LG V30
4738 Points ∼95% +47%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1943 - 3487, n=7)
3136 Points ∼63% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (127 - 6378, n=358)
1279 Points ∼26% -60%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
22441 Points ∼86%
Huawei P10 Plus
14934 Points ∼57% -33%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points ∼86% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
26226 Points ∼100% +17%
Apple iPhone X
25633 Points ∼98% +14%
OnePlus 5T
21348 Points ∼81% -5%
HTC U11 Plus
20820 Points ∼79% -7%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20233 Points ∼77% -10%
LG V30
14601 Points ∼56% -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (14556 - 23046, n=7)
20770 Points ∼79% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (7103 - 36762, n=505)
12408 Points ∼47% -45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
33472 Points ∼30%
Huawei P10 Plus
33307 Points ∼30% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points ∼30% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
46610 Points ∼41% +39%
Apple iPhone X
112489 Points ∼100% +236%
OnePlus 5T
58097 Points ∼52% +74%
HTC U11 Plus
58307 Points ∼52% +74%
Google Pixel 2 XL
54156 Points ∼48% +62%
LG V30
55271 Points ∼49% +65%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (22429 - 36231, n=7)
32542 Points ∼29% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 160199, n=505)
16687 Points ∼15% -50%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
30176 Points ∼47%
Huawei P10 Plus
26156 Points ∼41% -13%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points ∼48% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
39745 Points ∼62% +32%
Apple iPhone X
64169 Points ∼100% +113%
OnePlus 5T
42022 Points ∼65% +39%
HTC U11 Plus
41644 Points ∼65% +38%
Google Pixel 2 XL
39456 Points ∼61% +31%
LG V30
34139 Points ∼53% +13%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (20022 - 31605, n=7)
28896 Points ∼45% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=506)
14150 Points ∼22% -53%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
121 fps ∼68%
Huawei P10 Plus
56 fps ∼32% -54%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps ∼63% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
147 fps ∼83% +21%
Apple iPhone X
177.4 fps ∼100% +47%
OnePlus 5T
113 fps ∼64% -7%
HTC U11 Plus
113 fps ∼64% -7%
Google Pixel 2 XL
112 fps ∼63% -7%
LG V30
113 fps ∼64% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (97 - 125, n=7)
117 fps ∼66% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=530)
29.1 fps ∼16% -76%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
60 fps ∼100%
Huawei P10 Plus
40 fps ∼67% -33%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone X
59.4 fps ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼100% 0%
HTC U11 Plus
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼98% -2%
LG V30
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (59 - 60, n=7)
59.6 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=533)
24 fps ∼40% -60%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
61 fps ∼69%
Huawei P10 Plus
19 fps ∼22% -69%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps ∼61% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
74 fps ∼84% +21%
Apple iPhone X
88.2 fps ∼100% +45%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼68% -2%
HTC U11 Plus
60 fps ∼68% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼67% -3%
LG V30
59 fps ∼67% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (53 - 66, n=7)
59.1 fps ∼67% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 115, n=452)
15.5 fps ∼18% -75%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
54 fps ∼92%
Huawei P10 Plus
29 fps ∼50% -46%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps ∼96% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
45 fps ∼77% -17%
Apple iPhone X
58.5 fps ∼100% +8%
OnePlus 5T
53 fps ∼91% -2%
HTC U11 Plus
35 fps ∼60% -35%
Google Pixel 2 XL
35 fps ∼60% -35%
LG V30
35 fps ∼60% -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (50 - 56, n=7)
53.9 fps ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=455)
15.2 fps ∼26% -72%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
39 fps ∼80%
Huawei P10 Plus
22 fps ∼45% -44%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps ∼76% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
47 fps ∼96% +21%
Apple iPhone X
48.9 fps ∼100% +25%
OnePlus 5T
41 fps ∼84% +5%
HTC U11 Plus
41 fps ∼84% +5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
41 fps ∼84% +5%
LG V30
40 fps ∼82% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (21 - 39, n=7)
36 fps ∼74% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 69.3, n=317)
13.3 fps ∼27% -66%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
36 fps ∼82%
Huawei P10 Plus
12 fps ∼27% -67%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps ∼86% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
24 fps ∼54% -33%
Apple iPhone X
44.1 fps ∼100% +23%
OnePlus 5T
37 fps ∼84% +3%
HTC U11 Plus
21 fps ∼48% -42%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20 fps ∼45% -44%
LG V30
19 fps ∼43% -47%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (31 - 39, n=7)
35.9 fps ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=319)
13.2 fps ∼30% -63%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼72%
Huawei P10 Plus
15 fps ∼47% -35%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps ∼66% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
28 fps ∼88% +22%
Apple iPhone X
31.8 fps ∼100% +38%
OnePlus 5T
25 fps ∼79% +9%
HTC U11 Plus
25 fps ∼79% +9%
Google Pixel 2 XL
24 fps ∼75% +4%
LG V30
24 fps ∼75% +4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (20 - 23, n=7)
21.7 fps ∼68% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 40, n=248)
9.16 fps ∼29% -60%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
22 fps ∼79%
Huawei P10 Plus
10 fps ∼36% -55%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps ∼79% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
14 fps ∼51% -36%
Apple iPhone X
27.7 fps ∼100% +26%
OnePlus 5T
23 fps ∼83% +5%
HTC U11 Plus
13 fps ∼47% -41%
Google Pixel 2 XL
13 fps ∼47% -41%
LG V30
13 fps ∼47% -41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (19 - 23, n=7)
21.1 fps ∼76% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 50, n=251)
8.35 fps ∼30% -62%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
25.93 fps ∼67%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21.49 fps ∼56% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
35.83 fps ∼93% +38%
HTC U11 Plus
38.71 fps ∼100% +49%
Google Pixel 2 XL
37.71 fps ∼97% +45%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (21.5 - 25.9, n=2)
23.7 fps ∼61% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72)
12.1 fps ∼31% -53%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
887 Points ∼52%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
788 Points ∼46% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1481 Points ∼87% +67%
Apple iPhone X
1702 Points ∼100% +92%
HTC U11 Plus
868 Points ∼51% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
853 Points ∼50% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (788 - 887, n=2)
838 Points ∼49% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2606, n=68)
669 Points ∼39% -25%

Legend

 
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P10 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1)
224 Points ∼100% +285%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.59 Points ∼31% +19%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
66.477 Points ∼30% +14%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)
64.948 Points ∼29% +11%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
64.709 Points ∼29% +11%
Huawei P10 Plus
58.427 Points ∼26% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
58.255 Points ∼26%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.63 Points ∼25% -3%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points ∼24% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (33.1 - 58.6, n=7)
50.6 Points ∼23% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=387)
35.1 Points ∼16% -40%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
35255 Points ∼100% +204%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points ∼42% +27%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
12509 Points ∼35% +8%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
11584 Points ∼33%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)
11553 Points ∼33% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
11308 Points ∼32% -2%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points ∼30% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points ∼30% -10%
Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
10213 Points ∼29% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6692 - 11584, n=7)
9864 Points ∼28% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=523)
5237 Points ∼15% -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=542)
11780 ms * ∼100% -206%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3591 - 6221, n=7)
4466 ms * ∼38% -16%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
3852.2 ms * ∼33%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * ∼31% +6%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3590.6 ms * ∼30% +7%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
3434.1 ms * ∼29% +11%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)
3131.6 ms * ∼27% +19%
Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
3107 ms * ∼26% +19%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
3096 ms * ∼26% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2059.7 ms * ∼17% +47%
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
718 ms * ∼6% +81%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0)
354 Points ∼100% +95%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
194 Points ∼55% +7%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
182 Points ∼51%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
181 Points ∼51% -1%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)
179 Points ∼51% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points ∼46% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (119 - 182, n=7)
162 Points ∼46% -11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points ∼45% -13%
Huawei P10 Plus
140 Points ∼40% -23%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points ∼39% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=260)
104 Points ∼29% -43%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P20 ProHuawei P10 PlusSamsung Galaxy S9 PlusOnePlus 5TGoogle Pixel 2 XLLG V30Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
-24%
-26%
-20%
-41%
-12%
-76%
Random Write 4KB
160.49
149.78
-7%
22.74
-86%
20
-88%
17.84
-89%
10.21
-94%
98.4 (20 - 164, n=12)
-39%
14.1 (0.14 - 164, n=575)
-91%
Random Read 4KB
144.33
173.06
20%
129.68
-10%
138.1
-4%
170.55
18%
78.17
-46%
139 (132 - 147, n=12)
-4%
35.7 (1.59 - 173, n=575)
-75%
Sequential Write 256KB
196.69
182.64
-7%
204.94
4%
203.4
3%
195.26
-1%
193.22
-2%
202 (192 - 212, n=12)
3%
74.7 (2.99 - 228, n=575)
-62%
Sequential Read 256KB
831.82
732.94
-12%
818.69
-2%
698.7
-16%
760.14
-9%
669.48
-20%
764 (692 - 832, n=12)
-8%
218 (12.1 - 895, n=575)
-74%
Real Racing 3
 BeállításokÉrték
 high51 fps
World of Tanks Blitz
 BeállításokÉrték
 high, 0xAA, 0xAF60 fps
Shadow Fight 3
 BeállításokÉrték
 minimal60 fps
Max. terhelés
 35.5 °C35.3 °C33.4 °C 
 35 °C35.2 °C33.1 °C 
 34.6 °C35.6 °C33.1 °C 
Maximum: 35.6 °C
Átlag: 34.5 °C
32.1 °C33.4 °C33.2 °C
32.5 °C32.6 °C34.1 °C
31.7 °C34.3 °C34.3 °C
Maximum: 34.3 °C
Átlag: 33.1 °C
Tápegység (max.)  26.2 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 20.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.240.52532.942.43137.233.84031.7305039.635.16328.3318027.327.310026.930.612526.738.61602446.820020.951.725020.955.331519.554.240018.556.950017.561.863017.565.380015.769.3100015.872.5125016.675.2160015.869.4200015.471.9250015.573.931501675.3400015.876.850001674.5630016.370.6800016.371.31000016.267.21250016.459.71600016.449SPL28.684.9N1.160.3median 16.4Huawei P20 Promedian 67.2Delta2.19.928.628.224.928.424.621.226.419.330.829.123.624.620.223.319.927.217.638.919.150.619.149.917.454.316.961.516.860.915.163.616.567.915.6701570.615.572.115.371.715.773.515.573.215.576.715.476.115.873.71677.415.872.916.169.816.164.817.357.227.985.6164.4median 16Samsung Galaxy S9 Plusmedian 69.80.68.939.638.233.633.131.232.130.832.130.734.3343530.939.428.736.426.247.92651.925.354.82557.223.359.622.362.521.164.820.167.719.568.120.166.219.669.318.8731874.817.877.317.67617.675.517.773.517.873.81871.417.765.417.853.517.848.531.285.31.661.7median 19.5Apple iPhone Xmedian 66.23.29.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P20 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.01 / 0.28 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.84 / 1.54 / 1.57 Watt
Terhelés midlight 2.47 / 2.49 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Huawei P10 Plus
3750 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
HTC U11 Plus
3930 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-132%
-21%
-66%
-55%
-74%
-44%
-80%
-47%
Idle Minimum *
0.84
1.03
-23%
0.68
19%
1.03
-23%
0.51
39%
1.28
-52%
0.72
14%
0.974 (0.67 - 1.4, n=7)
-16%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=603)
-5%
Idle Average *
1.54
2.61
-69%
0.95
38%
2.4
-56%
1.62
-5%
1.87
-21%
1.37
11%
2.04 (1.15 - 2.6, n=7)
-32%
1.718 (0.6 - 6.2, n=602)
-12%
Idle Maximum *
1.57
2.83
-80%
1.09
31%
2.6
-66%
1.87
-19%
1.89
-20%
1.41
10%
2.33 (1.23 - 4.3, n=7)
-48%
1.987 (0.74 - 6.6, n=603)
-27%
Load Average *
2.47
7.03
-185%
4.58
-85%
2.96
-20%
3.92
-59%
3.73
-51%
3.46
-40%
4.88 (2.47 - 6.5, n=7)
-98%
4.02 (0.8 - 10.8, n=597)
-63%
Load Maximum *
2.49
10.08
-305%
5.16
-107%
6.6
-165%
8.27
-232%
8.08
-224%
7.83
-214%
7.61 (2.49 - 9.16, n=7)
-206%
5.68 (1.2 - 14.2, n=597)
-128%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
28h 47min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 65)
12h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 04min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
5h 45min
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Huawei P10 Plus
3750 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
HTC U11 Plus
3930 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-14%
-24%
-16%
-29%
-12%
-1%
-6%
11%
Reader / Idle
1727
1655
-4%
1343
-22%
1625
-6%
1292
-25%
1706
-1%
1914
11%
1754
2%
1744
1%
H.264
784
756
-4%
674
-14%
611
-22%
634
-19%
672
-14%
822
5%
799
2%
929
18%
WiFi v1.3
744
760
2%
521
-30%
607
-18%
564
-24%
581
-22%
774
4%
718
-3%
818
10%
Load
345
174
-50%
237
-31%
291
-16%
180
-48%
302
-12%
267
-23%
257
-26%
398
15%

Pro

+ csodás tripla kamera
+ világos és színhű Natural Tone kijelző
+ LTE Cat. 18
+ Dual SIM, dual VoLTE
+ aptX HD
+ jó teljesítmény
+ USB 3.1 + HDMI/DP
+ remek üzemidő
+ MIMO WiFi
+ gyors töltődés
+ IP67 minősítés
+ prémium kivitelezés

Kontra

- nincs 1440p-s kijelző
- nincs vezetéknélküli töltés
- no jack csatlakozó
- nem bővíthető háttértár
The Huawei P20 Pro in review. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany.
The Huawei P20 Pro in review. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany.

A Huawei P20 Pro kitűnő okostelefon. Alapja nagyrészt a Mate 10 Pro, amely pár dolgot jobban is csinál, mint a P20 Pro. A Mate 10 Pro designja esztétikusabb, üzemideje hosszabb, hívásminősége jobb, mindezt 250 euróval kevesebbért (a cikk megírásakor). A P20 Pro legfőbb erénye a Leica tripla kamera, amely viszont lesöpri a pályáról a Mate 10 Pro-t, és a riválisokat is. 

A Huawei még magasabbra tette a lécet a mobil fotózásban a Leica tripla kamerával. A P20 Pro az a készülék, amihez innentől minden okostelefon kameráját mérni fogják.

A Huawei P20 Pro a kitűnő kamerán túl is prémium hardvert kapott. A Kirin 970 egy gyors lapkakészlet, a belső tárhely bőséges, az USB-csatlakozó és MIMO Wi-Fi is sebes, rendelkezik IP67 minősítéssel, az LTE remekül teljesít, valamint aptX HD-képes is. Mindehhez jön még egy 4 000 mAh-s telep, és egy lenyűgöző kijelző. Pár hiányosságot azért meg kell említenünk. A P20 Pro teljesíthetne jobban a 2.4 GHz WiFi-vel, illetve jól jött volna a 3.5 mm jack és a bővíthető háttértár is. Ebben az árfekvésben egy vadiúj készüléknél pedig az 1440p-s kijelző is elvárható lenne. 

Mindezek ellenére a Leica tripla kamera fényét nehéz lenne elhomályosítani. A P20 Pro nem csak remek képeket készít, de a szoftver is elég rugalmas ahhoz, hogy lenyűgöző fotók készülhessenek vele bármilyen körülmények között, még kevés fény esetén is. A videorögzítés lehetne jobb, de ez leginkább szőrszálhasogatás részünkről. Például, a P20 Pro Ultra HD-ben nem tud 60 FPS-sel felvenni, és a 60 FPS + Full HD sem hoz túl lenyűgöző eredményeket, hiába javult elődjéhez képest. Összességében azonban, a P20 Pro a jelenlegi legjobb kamerával felszerelt okostelefon.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Huawei P20 Pro - 04/19/2018 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Váz
93%
Billentyűzet
72 / 75 → 96%
Érintőpad
97%
Csatlakoztathatóság
66 / 60 → 100%
Súly
90%
Akkumulátor
95%
Kijelző
92%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
64 / 63 → 100%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
69 / 70 → 99%
Hőmérséklet
90%
Zaj
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Camera
97%
Átlag
85%
92%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Huawei P20 Pro Smartphone rövid értékelés
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-04-23 (Update: 2018-04-23)