Notebookcheck

Huawei P Smart Smartphone rövid értékelés

Inge Schwabe (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 03/08/2018
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Mennyire okos a Huawei P Smart? Hogy ez nekünk miért nem jutott eszünkbe? Az "okos" szót beletenni egy okostelefon nevébe az pont annyira diszkrét, mintha egy focicsapatot "A csapat"-nak neveznének el. Ugyanakkor akaratlanul is felvetődik miatta a kérdés: mit jelent egészen pontosan ez az "okos"?

Huawei P smart (P Széria)
Processzor
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Kirin 659
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memória
3072 MB 
, 16 nm-es nyolcmagos, 4x 2.36 GHz, 4x 1.7 GHz
Kijelző
5.65 hüvelyk 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 428 PPI, kapacitív, 10 pontos multitouch, IPS, fényes: igen
Háttértár
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22.89 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm-es audio jack, Kártyaolvasó: microSD, max. 256 GB, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: ujjlenyomatolvasó, közelségérzékelő, iránytű, gravitációszenzor, USB: OTG, DisplayPort
Hálózat
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, B900, B1800, B1900; UMTS/HSPA+: 850, B900, B2100, B1900; LTE Band 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.45 x 150.1 x 72.05
Akkumulátor
0 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítium-Polimer
Operációs rendszer
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix kettős kamerarendszer, autofókusz, LED-vaku
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: mono, Billentyűzet: virtuális, 5 V/2 A töltő, microUSB kábel, quick start útmutató, garancialevél, headset, kijelzővédő fólia, EMUI 8.0, 24 Hónap Garancia, Miracast, USB OTG, MicroUSB 2.0, FM rádió, feji/testi SAR: 1.24 W/kg, fanless
Súly
143 g, Tápegység: 61 g
Ár
259 Euró
Hivatkozások

 

Size Comparison

Android navigation options
Android navigation options
quick start menu in lockscreen
quick start menu in lockscreen
quick start of apps via shortcut
quick start of apps via shortcut
for your convenience: a trash for deleted photos
for your convenience: a trash for deleted photos
split screen view for running two apps side-by-side
split screen view for running two apps side-by-side
 
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris X
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
333 MBit/s ∼100% +544%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s ∼92% +490%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
251 MBit/s ∼75% +385%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼36% +134%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s ∼16% +5%
Honor 9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 MBit/s ∼16% +2%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.7 MBit/s ∼16%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41.9 MBit/s ∼13% -19%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼100% +457%
BQ Aquaris X
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
270 MBit/s ∼96% +437%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
225 MBit/s ∼80% +347%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
111 MBit/s ∼40% +121%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s ∼19% +7%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.3 MBit/s ∼19% +6%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.3 MBit/s ∼18%
Honor 9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.9 MBit/s ∼18% -1%
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - overview
Garmin Edge 500 - S-turn
Garmin Edge 500 - S-turn
Garmin Edge 500 - switchback
Garmin Edge 500 - switchback
Huawei P Smart - overview
Huawei P Smart - overview
Huawei P Smart - S-turn
Huawei P Smart - S-turn
Huawei P Smart - switchback
Huawei P Smart - switchback
dual-camera bokeh effect
dual-camera bokeh effect
dual-camera bokeh effect
dual-camera bokeh effect
front-facing camera bokeh effect
front-facing camera bokeh effect

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
reference card
reference card
reference card (magnified)
shifted to the right
shifted to the right
floating keyboard
floating keyboard
landscape mode, split
landscape mode, split
size adjustment
size adjustment
keyboard menu
keyboard menu
individual keyboard design
individual keyboard design
594
cd/m²
584
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
587
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
548
cd/m²
527
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 594 cd/m² Átlag: 567.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4.34 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 89 %
Centrumban: 573 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 910:1 (Fekete: 0.63 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.24
Huawei P smart
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Honor 9 Lite
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Huawei P8 lite 2017
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.7
Motorola Moto G5s
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
BQ Aquaris X
LTPS IPS , 1920x1080, 5.2
Screen
11%
-5%
1%
15%
25%
-3%
-2%
Brightness middle
573
627
9%
575
0%
467
-18%
454
-21%
574
0%
490
-14%
675
18%
Brightness
568
622
10%
559
-2%
457
-20%
463
-18%
576
1%
502
-12%
702
24%
Brightness Distribution
89
82
-8%
91
2%
89
0%
86
-3%
94
6%
92
3%
91
2%
Black Level *
0.63
0.41
35%
0.39
38%
0.3
52%
0.43
32%
0.59
6%
Contrast
910
1529
68%
1474
62%
1557
71%
1140
25%
1144
26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.2
4.5
-7%
5.2
-24%
5
-19%
2
52%
2.4
43%
5.7
-36%
4.5
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.4
7
-9%
10.3
-61%
8.2
-28%
5.3
17%
3.8
41%
7.8
-22%
9.1
-42%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.6
5.1
-11%
7.2
-57%
6.1
-33%
1.7
63%
1.9
59%
4.7
-2%
6.4
-39%
Gamma
2.24 107%
2.26 106%
2.4 100%
2.15 112%
2.1 114%
2.09 115%
2.4 100%
2.24 107%
CCT
7157 91%
7201 90%
7224 90%
7961 82%
6394 102%
6502 100%
7526 86%
7478 87%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.3 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
66353 Points ∼29%
Honor 9 Lite
67727 Points ∼29% +2%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
56798 Points ∼25% -14%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
63195 Points ∼27% -5%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
47339 Points ∼21% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
45549 Points ∼20% -31%
Motorola Moto G5s
46370 Points ∼20% -30%
BQ Aquaris X
63428 Points ∼28% -4%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
4874 Points ∼47%
Honor 9 Lite
4911 Points ∼48% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
4847 Points ∼47% -1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3722 Points ∼36% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3756 Points ∼36% -23%
Motorola Moto G5s
3604 Points ∼35% -26%
BQ Aquaris X
4891 Points ∼47% 0%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
5817 Points ∼57%
Honor 9 Lite
5887 Points ∼57% +1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4419 Points ∼43% -24%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
6024 Points ∼59% +4%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
4920 Points ∼48% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5000 Points ∼49% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s
4669 Points ∼45% -20%
BQ Aquaris X
5792 Points ∼56% 0%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
919 Points ∼54%
Honor 9 Lite
888 Points ∼52% -3%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
753 Points ∼44% -18%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
666 Points ∼39% -28%
Motorola Moto G5s
703 Points ∼41% -24%
BQ Aquaris X
843 Points ∼50% -8%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
857 Points ∼9%
Honor 9 Lite
859 Points ∼9% 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
826 Points ∼9% -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
849 Points ∼9% -1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
533 Points ∼6% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
529 Points ∼6% -38%
Motorola Moto G5s
723 Points ∼8% -16%
BQ Aquaris X
1014 Points ∼11% +18%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
1889 Points ∼39%
Honor 9 Lite
1757 Points ∼37% -7%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1658 Points ∼35% -12%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1998 Points ∼42% +6%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1265 Points ∼26% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1296 Points ∼27% -31%
Motorola Moto G5s
656 Points ∼14% -65%
BQ Aquaris X
1039 Points ∼22% -45%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
3223 Points ∼31%
Honor 9 Lite
3058 Points ∼30% -5%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
2694 Points ∼26% -16%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
2983 Points ∼29% -7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2368 Points ∼23% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2185 Points ∼21% -32%
Motorola Moto G5s
1553 Points ∼15% -52%
BQ Aquaris X
3551 Points ∼35% +10%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
1480 Points ∼34%
Honor 9 Lite
1423 Points ∼33% -4%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
435 Points ∼10% -71%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1398 Points ∼32% -6%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
353 Points ∼8% -76%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1000 Points ∼23% -32%
Motorola Moto G5s
848 Points ∼20% -43%
BQ Aquaris X
1333 Points ∼31% -10%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
3117 Points ∼22%
Honor 9 Lite
3117 Points ∼22% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3015 Points ∼21% -3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2371 Points ∼16% -24%
Motorola Moto G5s
1871 Points ∼13% -40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
3732 Points ∼10%
Honor 9 Lite
3730 Points ∼10% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3631 Points ∼10% -3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3777 Points ∼10% +1%
Motorola Moto G5s
2270 Points ∼6% -39%
BQ Aquaris X
4522 Points ∼12% +21%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
946 Points ∼16%
Honor 9 Lite
945 Points ∼16% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
914 Points ∼15% -3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
736 Points ∼12% -22%
Motorola Moto G5s
630 Points ∼11% -33%
BQ Aquaris X
929 Points ∼16% -2%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
1827 Points ∼50%
Honor 9 Lite
1748 Points ∼48% -4%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1532 Points ∼42% -16%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1527 Points ∼42% -16%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1522 Points ∼41% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1670 Points ∼46% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s
1199 Points ∼33% -34%
BQ Aquaris X
2179 Points ∼59% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
256 Points ∼5%
Honor 9 Lite
253 Points ∼5% -1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
321 Points ∼6% +25%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
289 Points ∼5% +13%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
199 Points ∼4% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
253 Points ∼5% -1%
Motorola Moto G5s
243 Points ∼5% -5%
BQ Aquaris X
380 Points ∼7% +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
316 Points ∼7%
Honor 9 Lite
312 Points ∼7% -1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
389 Points ∼8% +23%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
353 Points ∼7% +12%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
247 Points ∼5% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
312 Points ∼7% -1%
Motorola Moto G5s
295 Points ∼6% -7%
BQ Aquaris X
465 Points ∼10% +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
1787 Points ∼49%
Honor 9 Lite
1788 Points ∼49% 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1547 Points ∼42% -13%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
1667 Points ∼46% -7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1535 Points ∼42% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1699 Points ∼47% -5%
Motorola Moto G5s
1158 Points ∼32% -35%
BQ Aquaris X
2139 Points ∼59% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
229 Points ∼3%
Honor 9 Lite
184 Points ∼2% -20%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
516 Points ∼6% +125%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
532 Points ∼6% +132%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
278 Points ∼3% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
407 Points ∼5% +78%
Motorola Moto G5s
483 Points ∼6% +111%
BQ Aquaris X
724 Points ∼9% +216%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
284 Points ∼4%
Honor 9 Lite
230 Points ∼4% -19%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
606 Points ∼10% +113%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
627 Points ∼10% +121%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
340 Points ∼5% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
490 Points ∼8% +73%
Motorola Moto G5s
555 Points ∼9% +95%
BQ Aquaris X
849 Points ∼13% +199%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
14930 Points ∼19%
Honor 9 Lite
14780 Points ∼19% -1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
13590 Points ∼17% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
11780 Points ∼15% -21%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12955 Points ∼16% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12954 Points ∼16% -13%
Motorola Moto G5s
9045 Points ∼11% -39%
BQ Aquaris X
17124 Points ∼22% +15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
11262 Points ∼2%
Honor 9 Lite
11712 Points ∼2% +4%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
11147 Points ∼2% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
9936 Points ∼2% -12%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
7456 Points ∼2% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7793 Points ∼2% -31%
Motorola Moto G5s
9626 Points ∼2% -15%
BQ Aquaris X
13330 Points ∼3% +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
11912 Points ∼6%
Honor 9 Lite
12278 Points ∼6% +3%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
11611 Points ∼6% -3%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
10294 Points ∼5% -14%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
8318 Points ∼4% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
8550 Points ∼4% -28%
Motorola Moto G5s
9491 Points ∼5% -20%
BQ Aquaris X
14034 Points ∼7% +18%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
19 fps ∼1%
Honor 9 Lite
19 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
18 fps ∼1% -5%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
16 fps ∼1% -16%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼1% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12 fps ∼1% -37%
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps ∼1% -16%
BQ Aquaris X
23 fps ∼1% +21%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
18 fps ∼4%
Honor 9 Lite
18 fps ∼4% 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
19 fps ∼4% +6%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
16 fps ∼3% -11%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼3% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
19 fps ∼4% +6%
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps ∼3% -11%
BQ Aquaris X
22 fps ∼5% +22%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
8.7 fps ∼2%
Honor 9 Lite
8.6 fps ∼2% -1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
7.9 fps ∼1% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
7.3 fps ∼1% -16%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼1% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5 fps ∼1% -43%
Motorola Moto G5s
7.1 fps ∼1% -18%
BQ Aquaris X
9.8 fps ∼2% +13%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
8.3 fps ∼2%
Honor 9 Lite
8.4 fps ∼2% +1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
8.5 fps ∼2% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
6.7 fps ∼2% -19%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼1% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
9.8 fps ∼3% +18%
Motorola Moto G5s
7.4 fps ∼2% -11%
BQ Aquaris X
9.7 fps ∼3% +17%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
5.3 fps ∼1%
Honor 9 Lite
3.2 fps ∼1% -40%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4.6 fps ∼1% -13%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
4.8 fps ∼1% -9%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.3 fps ∼1% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3.2 fps ∼1% -40%
Motorola Moto G5s
4.6 fps ∼1% -13%
BQ Aquaris X
6.4 fps ∼1% +21%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
5.2 fps ∼3%
Honor 9 Lite
5 fps ∼3% -4%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
5 fps ∼3% -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
4.5 fps ∼3% -13%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.2 fps ∼2% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7.3 fps ∼4% +40%
Motorola Moto G5s
5 fps ∼3% -4%
BQ Aquaris X
6.3 fps ∼4% +21%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
3.2 fps ∼1%
Honor 9 Lite
3.2 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
2.8 fps ∼1% -12%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
2.9 fps ∼1% -9%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼0% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1.9 fps ∼0% -41%
Motorola Moto G5s
2.5 fps ∼1% -22%
BQ Aquaris X
3.5 fps ∼1% +9%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P smart
2.9 fps ∼2%
Honor 9 Lite
2.9 fps ∼2% 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3 fps ∼3% +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
2.7 fps ∼2% -7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼2% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3.9 fps ∼3% +34%
Motorola Moto G5s
2.7 fps ∼2% -7%
BQ Aquaris X
3.5 fps ∼3% +21%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4.33 fps ∼11%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017
8323 Points ∼19%
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017
15988 Points ∼36%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017
145 Points ∼8%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei P8 lite 2017
43 fps ∼70%

Legend

 
Huawei P smart HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P8 lite 2017 HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
30.233 Points ∼100% +14%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55)
29.499 Points ∼98% +11%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
27.096 Points ∼90% +2%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
26.63 Points ∼88%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
26.42 Points ∼87% -1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
25.972 Points ∼86% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
23.281 Points ∼77% -13%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
18.661 Points ∼62% -30%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
5096 Points ∼100% +13%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
4786 Points ∼94% +6%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
4742 Points ∼93% +5%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55)
4630 Points ∼91% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
4560 Points ∼89% +1%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
4497 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
3799 Points ∼75% -16%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
3035 Points ∼60% -33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
13057 ms * ∼100% -35%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
10250.4 ms * ∼79% -6%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
9698.2 ms * ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
9669.2 ms * ∼74% -0%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
8825.1 ms * ∼68% +9%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55)
8768.2 ms * ∼67% +10%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
8693.6 ms * ∼67% +10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
6820.9 ms * ∼52% +30%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
108 Points ∼100% +17%
Huawei Mate 10 Lite (Chrome 62)
104 Points ∼96% +13%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
92 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
75 Points ∼69% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
64 Points ∼59% -30%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55)
62 Points ∼57% -33%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
61 Points ∼56% -34%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P smartHonor 9 LiteHuawei P8 lite 2017Huawei Mate 10 LiteSamsung Galaxy J7 2017Samsung Galaxy A3 2017Motorola Moto G5sBQ Aquaris X
AndroBench 3-5
39%
-50%
-27%
-36%
-41%
4%
-23%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
72.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
32.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-56%
35.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-51%
63.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
50.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-31%
62.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
62.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.26 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
53.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-35%
69.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-16%
76.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
75.47 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-8%
84.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
84.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
Random Write 4KB
21.3
66.83
214%
8
-62%
15.26
-28%
10.54
-51%
9.62
-55%
46.2
117%
11.85
-44%
Random Read 4KB
66.11
68.39
3%
38.7
-41%
31.5
-52%
25.86
-61%
22.32
-66%
40.6
-39%
37.47
-43%
Sequential Write 256KB
121.07
138.21
14%
42
-65%
99.79
-18%
52.98
-56%
45.96
-62%
77.5
-36%
75.34
-38%
Sequential Read 256KB
269.36
269.56
0%
165.8
-38%
286.78
6%
198.47
-26%
199.68
-26%
259
-4%
266.37
-1%
Dead Trigger 2
 BeállításokÉrték
 high58 fps
összehasonlítva
Lenovo Moto E3 (min)
 MT6735P, Mali-T720
26
   ...
Google Pixel XL 2016
 821 MSM8996 Pro, Adreno 530
58
HTC One A9s
 Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2
58
Huawei P smart
 Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2
58
HTC U11 Plus
 835, Adreno 540
59
Huawei P20
 Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12
59
   ...
Sony Xperia XA2 (max)
 630, Adreno 508
60
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 BeállításokÉrték
 high18 fps
összehasonlítva
Lenovo Moto E3 (min)
 MT6735P, Mali-T720
11
   ...
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1
18
Lenovo Tab 4 8
 425, Adreno 308
18
Huawei P smart
 Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2
18
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
 MT8735, Mali-T720 MP2
18
ZTE Blade V8
 435, Adreno 505
19
   ...
HTC 10 (max)
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
48

no benchmarks found

Max. terhelés
 35.5 °C35.7 °C34.6 °C 
 35.7 °C34.7 °C34.7 °C 
 34 °C34 °C35.3 °C 
Maximum: 35.7 °C
Átlag: 34.9 °C
30.3 °C31.8 °C33.2 °C
30.6 °C31.8 °C34.1 °C
31 °C31.2 °C32.8 °C
Maximum: 34.1 °C
Átlag: 31.9 °C
Tápegység (max.)  26.6 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 20.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.239.92532.935.73137.238.44031.738.45039.6436328.3328027.332.110026.932.712526.735.21602433.120020.939.125020.943.931519.546.340018.555.750017.560.163017.561.780015.761.8100015.867125016.671.2160015.870.7200015.472250015.570.131501674.1400015.87950001677.1630016.372.8800016.3731000016.273.41250016.467.41600016.457.6SPL28.685.2N1.157.7median 16.4Huawei P smartmedian 67Delta2.111.835.242.632.941.437.237.631.739.639.637.828.331.827.330.626.931.226.729.92432.820.939.620.945.819.549.818.557.317.558.417.559.815.762.315.866.216.66915.870.415.472.415.574.81676.415.878.31676.116.374.616.376.816.279.916.472.716.460.428.686.51.162.1median 16.4Huawei Mate 10 Litemedian 66.22.112.631.630.825.430.525.331.232.930.733.631.731.628.828.422.6272620.836.82240.221.349.220.853.721.257.119.462.619.567.417.767.817.969.517.870.717.372.117.474.616.775.217.275.518.277.917.981.417.67917.775.617.875.417.971.318.162.618.255.83087.11.370.5median 17.9Samsung Galaxy J7 2017median 69.51.310.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei P smart audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Mate 10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.01 / 0.23 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.62 / 1.76 / 1.87 Watt
Terhelés midlight 4.47 / 6.39 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Honor 9 Lite
3000 mAh
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3000 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3340 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2350 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X
3100 mAh
Power Consumption
-2%
-42%
-9%
46%
55%
4%
-13%
Idle Minimum *
0.62
0.85
-37%
1.44
-132%
0.87
-40%
0.39
37%
0.37
40%
0.67
-8%
1.12
-81%
Idle Average *
1.76
2
-14%
2.47
-40%
2.14
-22%
1.06
40%
0.78
56%
1.4
20%
2.16
-23%
Idle Maximum *
1.87
2.04
-9%
2.58
-38%
2.16
-16%
1.08
42%
0.84
55%
1.52
19%
2.18
-17%
Load Average *
4.47
3.23
28%
4.55
-2%
3.7
17%
1.82
59%
1.52
66%
4.56
-2%
2.94
34%
Load Maximum *
6.39
4.93
23%
6.3
1%
5.48
14%
3.21
50%
2.75
57%
7.05
-10%
5.1
20%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
16h 25min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 64)
9h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 15min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
3h 22min
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Honor 9 Lite
3000 mAh
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3000 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Lite
3340 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2350 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X
3100 mAh
Battery Runtime
8%
22%
0%
99%
108%
8%
5%
Reader / Idle
985
965
-2%
1326
35%
1150
17%
1950
98%
2862
191%
1233
25%
H.264
615
622
1%
644
5%
502
-18%
1096
78%
988
61%
645
5%
WiFi v1.3
565
601
6%
604
7%
520
-8%
904
60%
668
18%
518
-8%
592
5%
Load
202
253
25%
283
40%
223
10%
525
160%
532
163%
225
11%

Pro

+ elégséges teljesítmény
+ Android 8
+ a legfrissebb EMUI
+ dual SIM
+ kellemes test/kijelző arány
+ osztott képernyő
+ ujjlenyomatolvasó plusz funkciókkal
+ kettős főkamera bokeh effektussal
+ bokeh effektus szelfiknél
+ DisplayPort
+ headset

Kontra

- fontos 3G és 4G LTE sávokat nem támogat (elsősorban USA-ban használtakat)
- nincs ac-Wi-Fi
- mono
- nincs USB-C
- gyenge üzemidő
- a hátlapra helyezett ujjlenyomatolvasóhoz nem férünk hozzá, ha a telefon az asztalon fekszik
- a ház ujjlenyomatmágnes


In review: Huawei P Smart (FIG-LX1). Review unit courtesy of Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei P Smart (FIG-LX1). Review unit courtesy of Huawei Germany.

A Huawei P Smart a középkategóriás telefonok reklámarca lehetne. Főbb hardverei, mint a CPU-ja, GPU-ja, vagy telefonos rendszerei a többi középkategóriás okostelefonnal, például a P8 Lite-tal, Mate 10 Lite-tal és Honor 9 Lite-tal egyenrangúak. A Mate 10 Lite több RAM-ot és háttértárat kínál, de drágább. Emellett a Mate 10 Lite-al ellentétben a P Smart mellett nincs egy azonos nevű, de jobban felszerelt nagy testvér. Ennek megfelelően a bevezetőben felmerült kérdést - a készülék nevével kapcsolatban - leginkább a középkategória dicséreteként tudnánk megválaszolni.

A Huawei P Smart jó középkategóriás okostelefon, amely nem akar harcba szállni egyik jól ismert csúcstelefonnal sem.

Az ár/teljesítmény aránya jó, az összesített teljesítménye szintén - nem a leggyorsabb, de mindig az első felében van a mezőnynek. Az Operációs rendszer és az EMUI naprakész. A kiváló minőségű alu ház és a remek test/kijelző arány illik a P Smart ambícióihoz, de nem képes ellensúlyozni a két legnagyobb gyengeségét: a nagyon korlátozott kommunikációs sáv kínálatot, valamint a terhelés alatt rövid üzemidőt.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Huawei P smart - 02/25/2018 v6
Inge Schwabe

Váz
89%
Billentyűzet
70 / 75 → 94%
Érintőpad
91%
Csatlakoztathatóság
39 / 60 → 65%
Súly
93%
Akkumulátor
84%
Kijelző
86%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
20 / 63 → 32%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
52 / 70 → 75%
Hőmérséklet
92%
Zaj
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
72%
Átlag
74%
83%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Huawei P Smart Smartphone rövid értékelés
Inge Schwabe, 2018-03- 8 (Update: 2018-03- 8)