C 2018
Notebookcheck

Honor 9 Lite Smartphone rövid értékelés

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Tanja Hinum (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 03/27/2018
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Okosabb. A Honor 9 Lite nem rossz vétel 290 dollárért. Lapkakészlete egy felső középkategóriás darab, egyéb specifikációi szintén ígéretesek. Emellett négy kamerát is kapott. Nézzük, hogy hogyan teljesít a riválisok, valamint testvére, a Huawei P smart ellen.

Honor 9 Lite (9 Széria)
Processzor
HiSilicon Kirin 659
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memória
3072 MB 
Kijelző
5.65 hüvelyk 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 427 PPI, kapacitív, 10 pontos multitouch, IPS, fényes: igen
Háttértár
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22.74 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: kombinált fejhallgató/mikrofon jack (3.5 mm), Kártyaolvasó: microSD, max. 256 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: közelségérzékelő, gyorsulásmérő, G-szenzor, iránytű, OTG, FM rádio
Hálózat
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900 and 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 13 (sávok: 1, 3, 7, 8 and 20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.6 x 151 x 71.9
Akkumulátor
3000 mAh Lítium-Ion
Operációs rendszer
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix + 2 MPix (autofókusz, f/2.2, portré mód, 1080p-s videók)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix + 2 MPix (autofókusz, f/2.0, portré mód, 1080p-s videók)
További jellegzetességek
Billentyűzet: virtuális, USB kábel, moduláris hálózati töltő, fülhallgató, védőtok, EMUI 8.0, 24 Hónap Garancia, microUSB 2.0, FM rádió, feji SAR: 0.77 W/kg, test-SAR: 0.99 W/kg, fanless
Súly
149 g, Tápegység: 62 g
Ár
285 Euró
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris X
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
333 MBit/s ∼100% +533%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
278 MBit/s ∼83% +429%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼36% +130%
Nokia 6
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
117 MBit/s ∼35% +122%
Honor 9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 MBit/s ∼16%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.7 MBit/s ∼16% -2%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
281 MBit/s ∼100% +463%
BQ Aquaris X
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
270 MBit/s ∼96% +441%
Nokia 6
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼40% +126%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
111 MBit/s ∼40% +122%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.3 MBit/s ∼18% +1%
Honor 9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.9 MBit/s ∼18%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Honor 9 Lite
Honor 9 Lite
Honor 9 Lite
Honor 9 Lite
Honor 9 Lite
Honor 9 Lite
Honor 9 Lite image with front camera
Honor 9 Lite image with front camera in portrait mode
Huawei P smart image with front camera

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
684
cd/m²
609
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
671
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
673
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
560
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 684 cd/m² Átlag: 621.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.22 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 82 %
Centrumban: 627 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1529:1 (Fekete: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.26
Honor 9 Lite
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Huawei P smart
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
BQ Aquaris X
LTPS IPS , 1920x1080, 5.2
Nokia 6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2
ZTE Blade V8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei P10 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Motorola Moto G5s
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Screen
-10%
-12%
-20%
4%
-14%
-10%
-11%
Brightness middle
627
573
-9%
675
8%
512
-18%
448
-29%
482
-23%
507
-19%
490
-22%
Brightness
622
568
-9%
702
13%
501
-19%
451
-27%
448
-28%
509
-18%
502
-19%
Brightness Distribution
82
89
9%
91
11%
94
15%
91
11%
79
-4%
95
16%
92
12%
Black Level *
0.41
0.63
-54%
0.59
-44%
0.36
12%
0.64
-56%
0.36
12%
0.43
-5%
Contrast
1529
910
-40%
1144
-25%
1422
-7%
753
-51%
1408
-8%
1140
-25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
4.2
7%
4.5
-0%
6.4
-42%
2.7
40%
4
11%
5.1
-13%
5.7
-27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7
6.4
9%
9.1
-30%
10.9
-56%
9.8
-40%
6.5
7%
9
-29%
7.8
-11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.1
4.6
10%
6.4
-25%
7.2
-41%
1.6
69%
3.4
33%
6.1
-20%
4.7
8%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.24 98%
2.24 98%
2.28 96%
2.06 107%
2.13 103%
2.28 96%
2.4 92%
CCT
7201 90%
7157 91%
7478 87%
7904 82%
6557 99%
6774 96%
8143 80%
7526 86%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8677 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
67727 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
45613 Points ∼18% -33%
BQ Aquaris X
63428 Points ∼25% -6%
Nokia 6
47066 Points ∼19% -31%
ZTE Blade V8
45868 Points ∼18% -32%
Huawei P10 Lite
60438 Points ∼24% -11%
Motorola Moto G5s
46370 Points ∼18% -32%
Huawei P smart
66353 Points ∼26% -2%
Huawei Honor 7X
62810 Points ∼25% -7%
Huawei Nova 2
63304 Points ∼25% -7%
AnTuTu v7
MEM (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
9280 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
4775 Points ∼27% -49%
Huawei P smart
8544 Points ∼49% -8%
Huawei Honor 7X
7947 Points ∼46% -14%
UX (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
24145 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
15576 Points ∼23% -35%
Huawei P smart
24255 Points ∼36% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
21484 Points ∼32% -11%
GPU (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
14340 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
8563 Points ∼6% -40%
Huawei P smart
13168 Points ∼9% -8%
Huawei Honor 7X
13110 Points ∼9% -9%
CPU (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
41874 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
32911 Points ∼27% -21%
Huawei P smart
41721 Points ∼35% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
39451 Points ∼33% -6%
Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
89639 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
61825 Points ∼18% -31%
Huawei P smart
87688 Points ∼25% -2%
Huawei Honor 7X
81992 Points ∼24% -9%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
4911 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3889 Points ∼38% -21%
BQ Aquaris X
4891 Points ∼47% 0%
Nokia 6
3723 Points ∼36% -24%
ZTE Blade V8
3815 Points ∼37% -22%
Huawei P10 Lite
4464 Points ∼43% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s
3604 Points ∼35% -27%
Huawei P smart
4874 Points ∼47% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X
4859 Points ∼47% -1%
Huawei Nova 2
4822 Points ∼47% -2%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
5887 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
5006 Points ∼38% -15%
BQ Aquaris X
5792 Points ∼44% -2%
Nokia 6
4980 Points ∼38% -15%
ZTE Blade V8
4978 Points ∼38% -15%
Huawei P10 Lite
5794 Points ∼44% -2%
Motorola Moto G5s
4669 Points ∼35% -21%
Huawei P smart
5817 Points ∼44% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X
6213 Points ∼47% +6%
Huawei Nova 2
6252 Points ∼47% +6%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
888 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
737 Points ∼43% -17%
BQ Aquaris X
843 Points ∼49% -5%
Nokia 6
10 Points ∼1% -99%
ZTE Blade V8
744 Points ∼43% -16%
Huawei P10 Lite
654 Points ∼38% -26%
Motorola Moto G5s
703 Points ∼41% -21%
Huawei P smart
919 Points ∼53% +3%
Huawei Honor 7X
724 Points ∼42% -18%
Huawei Nova 2
847 Points ∼49% -5%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
859 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
534 Points ∼3% -38%
BQ Aquaris X
1014 Points ∼6% +18%
Nokia 6
731 Points ∼5% -15%
ZTE Blade V8
787 Points ∼5% -8%
Huawei P10 Lite
829 Points ∼5% -3%
Motorola Moto G5s
723 Points ∼5% -16%
Huawei P smart
857 Points ∼5% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
845 Points ∼5% -2%
Huawei Nova 2
843 Points ∼5% -2%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
1757 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1249 Points ∼26% -29%
BQ Aquaris X
1039 Points ∼22% -41%
Nokia 6
587 Points ∼12% -67%
ZTE Blade V8
812 Points ∼17% -54%
Huawei P10 Lite
1592 Points ∼33% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s
656 Points ∼14% -63%
Huawei P smart
1889 Points ∼39% +8%
Huawei Honor 7X
1788 Points ∼37% +2%
Huawei Nova 2
2011 Points ∼42% +14%
System (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
3058 Points ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
2218 Points ∼18% -27%
BQ Aquaris X
3551 Points ∼29% +16%
Nokia 6
2135 Points ∼17% -30%
ZTE Blade V8
1562 Points ∼13% -49%
Huawei P10 Lite
2642 Points ∼22% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s
1553 Points ∼13% -49%
Huawei P smart
3223 Points ∼26% +5%
Huawei Honor 7X
2899 Points ∼24% -5%
Huawei Nova 2
2959 Points ∼24% -3%
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
1423 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1022 Points ∼17% -28%
BQ Aquaris X
1333 Points ∼22% -6%
Nokia 6
307 Points ∼5% -78%
ZTE Blade V8
928 Points ∼15% -35%
Huawei P10 Lite
1229 Points ∼20% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s
848 Points ∼14% -40%
Huawei P smart
1480 Points ∼24% +4%
Huawei Honor 7X
1334 Points ∼22% -6%
Huawei Nova 2
1436 Points ∼24% +1%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
3117 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
2332 Points ∼16% -25%
Motorola Moto G5s
1871 Points ∼13% -40%
Huawei P smart
3117 Points ∼22% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
2772 Points ∼19% -11%
Huawei Nova 2
2997 Points ∼21% -4%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
3730 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3704 Points ∼10% -1%
BQ Aquaris X
4522 Points ∼12% +21%
Nokia 6
2844 Points ∼8% -24%
Huawei P10 Lite
3460 Points ∼10% -7%
Motorola Moto G5s
2270 Points ∼6% -39%
Huawei P smart
3732 Points ∼10% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
3342 Points ∼9% -10%
Huawei Nova 2
3556 Points ∼10% -5%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
945 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
732 Points ∼12% -23%
BQ Aquaris X
929 Points ∼16% -2%
Nokia 6
667 Points ∼11% -29%
Huawei P10 Lite
913 Points ∼15% -3%
Motorola Moto G5s
630 Points ∼11% -33%
Huawei P smart
946 Points ∼16% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
869 Points ∼15% -8%
Huawei Nova 2
918 Points ∼15% -3%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
1748 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1727 Points ∼41% -1%
BQ Aquaris X
2179 Points ∼52% +25%
Nokia 6
1225 Points ∼29% -30%
ZTE Blade V8
1214 Points ∼29% -31%
Huawei P10 Lite
1592 Points ∼38% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s
1199 Points ∼29% -31%
Huawei P smart
1827 Points ∼44% +5%
Huawei Honor 7X
1553 Points ∼37% -11%
Huawei Nova 2
1662 Points ∼40% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
253 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
185 Points ∼3% -27%
BQ Aquaris X
380 Points ∼7% +50%
Nokia 6
243 Points ∼5% -4%
ZTE Blade V8
263 Points ∼5% +4%
Huawei P10 Lite
326 Points ∼6% +29%
Motorola Moto G5s
243 Points ∼5% -4%
Huawei P smart
256 Points ∼5% +1%
Huawei Honor 7X
338 Points ∼6% +34%
Huawei Nova 2
330 Points ∼6% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
312 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
231 Points ∼5% -26%
BQ Aquaris X
465 Points ∼10% +49%
Nokia 6
296 Points ∼6% -5%
ZTE Blade V8
318 Points ∼7% +2%
Huawei P10 Lite
396 Points ∼8% +27%
Motorola Moto G5s
295 Points ∼6% -5%
Huawei P smart
316 Points ∼7% +1%
Huawei Honor 7X
409 Points ∼9% +31%
Huawei Nova 2
402 Points ∼8% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
1788 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1685 Points ∼41% -6%
BQ Aquaris X
2139 Points ∼52% +20%
Nokia 6
1238 Points ∼30% -31%
ZTE Blade V8
1127 Points ∼27% -37%
Huawei P10 Lite
1537 Points ∼37% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s
1158 Points ∼28% -35%
Huawei P smart
1787 Points ∼43% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
1656 Points ∼40% -7%
Huawei Nova 2
1657 Points ∼40% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
184 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
277 Points ∼3% +51%
BQ Aquaris X
724 Points ∼9% +293%
Nokia 6
495 Points ∼6% +169%
ZTE Blade V8
542 Points ∼7% +195%
Huawei P10 Lite
520 Points ∼6% +183%
Motorola Moto G5s
483 Points ∼6% +163%
Huawei P smart
229 Points ∼3% +24%
Huawei Honor 7X
528 Points ∼6% +187%
Huawei Nova 2
526 Points ∼6% +186%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
230 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
340 Points ∼5% +48%
BQ Aquaris X
849 Points ∼13% +269%
Nokia 6
571 Points ∼9% +148%
ZTE Blade V8
613 Points ∼10% +167%
Huawei P10 Lite
610 Points ∼10% +165%
Motorola Moto G5s
555 Points ∼9% +141%
Huawei P smart
284 Points ∼4% +23%
Huawei Honor 7X
622 Points ∼10% +170%
Huawei Nova 2
620 Points ∼10% +170%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
14780 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
12605 Points ∼16% -15%
BQ Aquaris X
17124 Points ∼22% +16%
Nokia 6
8973 Points ∼11% -39%
ZTE Blade V8
8905 Points ∼11% -40%
Huawei P10 Lite
13510 Points ∼17% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s
9045 Points ∼11% -39%
Huawei P smart
14930 Points ∼19% +1%
Huawei Honor 7X
13372 Points ∼17% -10%
Huawei Nova 2
14488 Points ∼18% -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
11712 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
7484 Points ∼2% -36%
BQ Aquaris X
13330 Points ∼3% +14%
Nokia 6
9605 Points ∼2% -18%
ZTE Blade V8
10271 Points ∼2% -12%
Huawei P10 Lite
10603 Points ∼2% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s
9626 Points ∼2% -18%
Huawei P smart
11262 Points ∼2% -4%
Huawei Honor 7X
10332 Points ∼2% -12%
Huawei Nova 2
11688 Points ∼2% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
12278 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
8227 Points ∼4% -33%
BQ Aquaris X
14034 Points ∼7% +14%
Nokia 6
9457 Points ∼5% -23%
ZTE Blade V8
9932 Points ∼5% -19%
Huawei P10 Lite
11135 Points ∼5% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s
9491 Points ∼5% -23%
Huawei P smart
11912 Points ∼6% -3%
Huawei Honor 7X
10882 Points ∼5% -11%
Huawei Nova 2
12212 Points ∼6% -1%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
19 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
12 fps ∼1% -37%
BQ Aquaris X
23 fps ∼1% +21%
Nokia 6
16 fps ∼1% -16%
ZTE Blade V8
11 fps ∼1% -42%
Huawei P10 Lite
17 fps ∼1% -11%
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps ∼1% -16%
Huawei P smart
19 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
19 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei Nova 2
19 fps ∼1% 0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
18 fps ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
20 fps ∼4% +11%
BQ Aquaris X
22 fps ∼5% +22%
Nokia 6
16 fps ∼3% -11%
ZTE Blade V8
9.7 fps ∼2% -46%
Huawei P10 Lite
18 fps ∼4% 0%
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps ∼3% -11%
Huawei P smart
18 fps ∼4% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
18 fps ∼4% 0%
Huawei Nova 2
20 fps ∼4% +11%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
8.6 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
5.1 fps ∼1% -41%
BQ Aquaris X
9.8 fps ∼2% +14%
Nokia 6
7.1 fps ∼1% -17%
ZTE Blade V8
4.6 fps ∼1% -47%
Huawei P10 Lite
7.2 fps ∼1% -16%
Motorola Moto G5s
7.1 fps ∼1% -17%
Huawei P smart
8.7 fps ∼2% +1%
Huawei Honor 7X
8 fps ∼1% -7%
Huawei Nova 2
7.9 fps ∼1% -8%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
8.4 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
10 fps ∼3% +19%
BQ Aquaris X
9.7 fps ∼3% +15%
Nokia 6
7 fps ∼2% -17%
ZTE Blade V8
4.5 fps ∼1% -46%
Huawei P10 Lite
7.7 fps ∼2% -8%
Motorola Moto G5s
7.4 fps ∼2% -12%
Huawei P smart
8.3 fps ∼2% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X
7.9 fps ∼2% -6%
Huawei Nova 2
8.9 fps ∼2% +6%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
3.2 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3.2 fps ∼1% 0%
BQ Aquaris X
6.4 fps ∼1% +100%
Nokia 6
4.6 fps ∼1% +44%
ZTE Blade V8
2.4 fps ∼0% -25%
Huawei P10 Lite
4.2 fps ∼1% +31%
Motorola Moto G5s
4.6 fps ∼1% +44%
Huawei P smart
5.3 fps ∼1% +66%
Huawei Honor 7X
4.7 fps ∼1% +47%
Huawei Nova 2
4.8 fps ∼1% +50%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
5 fps ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
7.4 fps ∼4% +48%
BQ Aquaris X
6.3 fps ∼4% +26%
Nokia 6
4.5 fps ∼3% -10%
ZTE Blade V8
4.9 fps ∼3% -2%
Huawei P10 Lite
4.8 fps ∼3% -4%
Motorola Moto G5s
5 fps ∼3% 0%
Huawei P smart
5.2 fps ∼3% +4%
Huawei Honor 7X
4.5 fps ∼3% -10%
Huawei Nova 2
5.2 fps ∼3% +4%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
3.2 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1.9 fps ∼0% -41%
BQ Aquaris X
3.5 fps ∼1% +9%
Nokia 6
2.5 fps ∼1% -22%
ZTE Blade V8
2.1 fps ∼1% -34%
Huawei P10 Lite
2.8 fps ∼1% -12%
Motorola Moto G5s
2.5 fps ∼1% -22%
Huawei P smart
3.2 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
2.9 fps ∼1% -9%
Huawei Nova 2
2.9 fps ∼1% -9%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 9 Lite
2.9 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3.7 fps ∼3% +28%
BQ Aquaris X
3.5 fps ∼3% +21%
Nokia 6
2.5 fps ∼2% -14%
ZTE Blade V8
2.7 fps ∼2% -7%
Huawei P10 Lite
3 fps ∼3% +3%
Motorola Moto G5s
2.7 fps ∼2% -7%
Huawei P smart
2.9 fps ∼2% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
2.9 fps ∼2% 0%
Huawei Nova 2
3.1 fps ∼3% +7%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei Honor 7X
4.32 fps ∼11%
Huawei Nova 2
4.96 fps ∼13%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
8015 Points ∼18%
Huawei Honor 7X
8774 Points ∼20%
Huawei Nova 2
8749 Points ∼20%
Medium Quality (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
16486 Points ∼37%
Huawei Honor 7X
16931 Points ∼38%
Huawei Nova 2
17001 Points ∼38%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
110 Points ∼4%
Huawei Nova 2
147 Points ∼6%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
47.3 fps ∼77%

Legend

 
Honor 9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 658, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P smart HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Honor 7X HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Nova 2 HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
30.047 Points ∼100% +14%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
27.096 Points ∼90% +3%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
26.63 Points ∼89% +1%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
26.42 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
26.37 Points ∼88% 0%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
18.661 Points ∼62% -29%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
17.558 Points ∼58% -34%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)
17.524 Points ∼58% -34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
4968 Points ∼100% +5%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
4786 Points ∼96% +1%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
4742 Points ∼95%
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
4589 Points ∼92% -3%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
4497 Points ∼91% -5%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
3035 Points ∼61% -36%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
2899 Points ∼58% -39%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)
2826 Points ∼57% -40%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
13057 ms * ∼100% -27%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)
12297.4 ms * ∼94% -20%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
12062.3 ms * ∼92% -18%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
10250.4 ms * ∼79%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
9698.2 ms * ∼74% +5%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
8825.1 ms * ∼68% +14%
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
8590.8 ms * ∼66% +16%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
6784.4 ms * ∼52% +34%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
108 Points ∼100%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
92 Points ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
80 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
62 Points ∼57% -43%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
61 Points ∼56% -44%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
60 Points ∼56% -44%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)
53 Points ∼49% -51%

* ... smaller is better

Honor 9 LiteHuawei P smartSamsung Galaxy J5 (2017) DuosBQ Aquaris XNokia 6Motorola Moto G5s
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
-48%
-31%
-33%
-22%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
71.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
72.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
44.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-39%
62.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
56.6
-21%
62.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.26 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
72.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-13%
84.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
84.6
2%
84.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
Random Write 4KB
66.83
21.3
-68%
9.9
-85%
11.85
-82%
11.34
-83%
46.2
-31%
Random Read 4KB
68.39
66.11
-3%
24.07
-65%
37.47
-45%
33.8
-51%
40.6
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB
138.21
121.07
-12%
51.96
-62%
75.34
-45%
77.06
-44%
77.5
-44%
Sequential Read 256KB
269.56
269.36
0%
204.45
-24%
266.37
-1%
273.06
1%
259
-4%
Asphalt 8: Airborne - high
Nokia 6
24 fps ∼100% +50%
Huawei P10 Lite
22 fps ∼92% +38%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
22 fps ∼92% +38%
ZTE Blade V8
19 fps ∼79% +19%
Huawei P smart
18 fps ∼75% +13%
Honor 9 Lite
16 fps ∼67%
Dead Trigger 2 - high
Huawei P smart
58 fps ∼100% +93%
Huawei P10 Lite
51 fps ∼88% +70%
Nokia 6
50 fps ∼86% +67%
ZTE Blade V8
30 fps ∼52% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
30 fps ∼52% 0%
Honor 9 Lite
30 fps ∼52%
Max. terhelés
 33 °C33.1 °C33.7 °C 
 32.7 °C31.7 °C34.6 °C 
 32 °C31.3 °C33.3 °C 
Maximum: 34.6 °C
Átlag: 32.8 °C
30.1 °C30.6 °C33 °C
29.6 °C30 °C33.2 °C
29.4 °C30.2 °C31.9 °C
Maximum: 33.2 °C
Átlag: 30.9 °C
Tápegység (max.)  28.4 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.238.32532.938.73137.231.14031.732.95039.636.36328.330.68027.327.110026.930.312526.729.11602435.220020.939.925020.943.531519.548.640018.556.950017.560.463017.563.380015.765.4100015.870125016.671.8160015.873.2200015.470.7250015.571.131501672.5400015.87850001679630016.375.2800016.375.21000016.277.71250016.468.71600016.458.3SPL28.686.1N1.162.4median 16.4median 68.7Delta2.112.231.63225.438.425.33432.93033.629.631.628.528.429.32731.820.834.92243.421.349.120.855.521.260.719.463.719.567.417.770.217.971.417.868.917.37017.472.616.775.117.277.418.278.117.981.417.676.717.775.417.874.517.970.518.161.818.258.43086.81.370median 17.9median 701.39.530.529.430.531303134.829.834.837.93337.93226.53230.826.230.833.630.933.631.832.431.838.232.638.240.621.940.650.421.250.456.720.856.761.619.261.663.520.863.567.421.667.467.518.767.567.217.967.265.417.665.463.817.263.86416.46469.516.769.569.116.469.166.516.166.564.515.964.564.81664.863.11663.16216.16262.215.962.257.915.957.950.21650.27829.678431.343median 63.5median 17.2median 63.56.42.66.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 9 LiteSamsung Galaxy J5 (2017) DuosNokia 6
Honor 9 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Nokia 6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.01 / 0.26 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.85 / 2 / 2.04 Watt
Terhelés midlight 3.23 / 4.93 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 9 Lite
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X
3100 mAh
Nokia 6
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V8
2730 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
42%
-8%
3%
1%
-2%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
0.85
0.52
39%
1.12
-32%
0.63
26%
0.98
-15%
0.67
21%
0.62
27%
Idle Average *
2
1.17
41%
2.16
-8%
1.75
12%
1.76
12%
1.4
30%
1.76
12%
Idle Maximum *
2.04
1.24
39%
2.18
-7%
1.87
8%
1.79
12%
1.52
25%
1.87
8%
Load Average *
3.23
1.66
49%
2.94
9%
3.56
-10%
2.89
11%
4.56
-41%
4.47
-38%
Load Maximum *
4.93
2.94
40%
5.1
-3%
5.85
-19%
5.62
-14%
7.05
-43%
6.39
-30%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
16h 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 63)
10h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 22min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
4h 13min
Honor 9 Lite
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X
3100 mAh
Nokia 6
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V8
2730 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
52%
-1%
16%
5%
2%
-6%
Reader / Idle
965
1564
62%
1695
76%
964
0%
1233
28%
985
2%
H.264
622
917
47%
542
-13%
545
-12%
645
4%
615
-1%
WiFi v1.3
601
738
23%
592
-1%
670
11%
700
16%
518
-14%
565
-6%
Load
253
449
77%
228
-10%
297
17%
225
-11%
202
-20%

Pro

+ világos, kontrasztos kijelző
+ karcsú design
+ FM rádió
+ hibrid SIM
+ gyors LTE Cat. 13
+ bővíthető háttértár
+ jó kettős szelfikamera

Kontra

- középszerű hangszórók
- gyenge GPU
- nincs USB-C
- nincs ac Wi-Fi
Review: The Honor 9 Lite. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.
Review: The Honor 9 Lite. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.

A Honor egy jó középkategóriás okostelefont alkotott. Egy világos kijelzővel, elég jó kamerarendszerekkel, és sima futású rendszerrel nyert meg minket. Ezen felül a designja is remek, vonzó színváltozatokkal.

Az üzemideje jó, de lehetett volna jobb is, alaposabb optimalizálással. A 9 Lite sajnos még mindig microUSB-vel van felszerelve, és a Wi-Fi modulja is viszonylag lassú. Cserébe az LTE viszont elég gyors lett.

A Honor 9 Lite jól teljesített tesztünkön, világos kijelzőjével, gyors LTE moduljával és 4 kamerájával. A gamerek azonban nem mindig lesznek elégedettek vele.

A Huawei P smart-tal összevetve örvendetes volt látni, hogy a most tesztelt készülék kicsivel jobban teljesített, hála a világosabb kijelzőnek, a jobb előlapi kamerának és az alacsonyabb árnak. Amennyiben az üveg hátlap nem szimpatikus egy okostelefonon, úgy a P smart-ot érdemes választani, mivel azon a hátoldal alumíniumból készült.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Honor 9 Lite - 03/09/2018 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Váz
87%
Billentyűzet
70 / 75 → 94%
Érintőpad
91%
Csatlakoztathatóság
39 / 60 → 66%
Súly
92%
Akkumulátor
92%
Kijelző
87%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
19 / 63 → 29%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
54 / 70 → 78%
Hőmérséklet
92%
Zaj
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
72%
Átlag
74%
84%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Honor 9 Lite Smartphone rövid értékelés
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-03-27 (Update: 2018-03-27)