Notebookcheck

Honor 9 Smartphone rövid értékelés

Florian Wimmer (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 08/24/2017
Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Csillogó. Az elődjéhez hasonlóan a Honor 9 is vonzó első ránézésre, menő designjával és a hátoldalán táncoló tükrözödéssel. Vajon ez csak illúzió, vagy a Honor új zászlóshajója kettős kamerájával és teljesítményével is ugyanilyen meggyőzően alakít? Cikkünkből kiderül.

Honor 9
Processzor
HiSilicon Kirin 960
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Memória
4096 MB 
Kijelző
5.15 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 428 PPI, kapacitív, IPS/LTPS, fényes: igen
Háttértár
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infraport, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm audió, Kártyaolvasó: microSD, max. 256 GB (hibrid SIM slot), 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: gyorsulásmérő, giroszenzor, közelségérzékelő, iránytű, USB-OTG
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM 850/​900/​1800/​1900, UMTS B1/B2/B5/B8, LTE B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.5 x 147 x 71
Akkumulátor
12.16 Wh, 3200 mAh Lítium-Polimer, Super Charge
Operációs rendszer
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix dual kamera, 20 MP + 12 MP, f/2.2, phase-shift autofókusz, Laser-AF, 2x optikai zoom, dual-LED vaku, videók @ 2160p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix LED vaku, videók @ 1080p
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: mono, az alsó élen, Billentyűzet: virtuális, töltő, USB kábel, SIM tű, Telephone Manager, Designs, HiCare, Health, SmartController, Vmall, 24 Hónap Garancia, LTE Cat. 6, sebesség: letöltés max. 300 Mbit/s, feltöltés max. 50 MBit/s; SAR: 1.26 W/​kg (fej), 1.26 W/​kg (test), fanless
Súly
155 g, Tápegység: 74 g
Ár
469 Euró

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
371 MBit/s ∼100% +31%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
308 (min: 48.8) MBit/s ∼83% +9%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
283 MBit/s ∼76%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32.9 MBit/s ∼9% -88%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
539 MBit/s ∼100% +285%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (min: 154) MBit/s ∼64% +145%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
140 MBit/s ∼26%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31.2 MBit/s ∼6% -78%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Honor 9 – overview
GPS Honor 9 – overview
GPS Honor 9 – crossroads
GPS Honor 9 – crossroads
GPS Honor 9 – bridge
GPS Honor 9 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Picture of reference card
Picture of reference card
Detail of reference card
Detail of reference card
ColorChecker: the target color is displayed in the bottom are of each field.
ColorChecker: the target color is displayed in the bottom are of each field.
546
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
556
cd/m²
511
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 556 cd/m² Átlag: 534.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.33 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 92 %
Centrumban: 550 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1310:1 (Fekete: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.38
Honor 9
IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Sony Xperia XZ
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1
OnePlus 5
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Honor 8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Xiaomi Mi 6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Screen
-26%
-13%
22%
-29%
-29%
3%
Brightness
535
521
-3%
556
4%
431
-19%
633
18%
443
-17%
586
10%
Brightness Distribution
92
93
1%
86
-7%
93
1%
93
1%
93
1%
89
-3%
Black Level *
0.42
0.37
12%
0.43
-2%
0.66
-57%
0.4
5%
0.28
33%
Contrast
1310
1470
12%
1272
-3%
997
-24%
1128
-14%
2214
69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.3
5.8
-76%
4.8
-45%
1.6
52%
4.9
-48%
5.4
-64%
4.8
-45%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.6
7.2
-100%
4.5
-25%
1.7
53%
5.8
-61%
6.7
-86%
5.3
-47%
Gamma
2.38 101%
2.18 110%
2.39 100%
2.25 107%
2.26 106%
2.33 103%
2.25 107%
CCT
7226 90%
8619 75%
7194 90%
6329 103%
7840 83%
8262 79%
7473 87%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6577 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 25.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 9
150276 Points ∼66%
Sony Xperia XZ
129317 Points ∼57% -14%
Huawei P10
140084 Points ∼61% -7%
OnePlus 5
177156 Points ∼78% +18%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
62484 Points ∼27% -58%
Honor 8
94671 Points ∼42% -37%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Honor 9
6113 Points ∼90%
Sony Xperia XZ
5616 Points ∼82% -8%
Huawei P10
6206 Points ∼91% +2%
OnePlus 5
6579 Points ∼96% +8%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 9
7034 Points ∼85%
Sony Xperia XZ
5058 Points ∼61% -28%
Huawei P10
7341 Points ∼88% +4%
OnePlus 5
7826 Points ∼94% +11%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points ∼82% -4%
Honor 8
6735 Points ∼81% -4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Honor 9
1069 Points ∼69%
Sony Xperia XZ
1066 Points ∼69% 0%
Huawei P10
1077 Points ∼70% +1%
OnePlus 5
1287 Points ∼83% +20%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points ∼46% -34%
Honor 8
994 Points ∼64% -7%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 9
4126 Points ∼48%
Sony Xperia XZ
4716 Points ∼55% +14%
Huawei P10
4115 Points ∼48% 0%
OnePlus 5
6144 Points ∼71% +49%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points ∼12% -75%
Honor 8
1703 Points ∼20% -59%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 9
3258 Points ∼74%
Sony Xperia XZ
1434 Points ∼32% -56%
Huawei P10
2778 Points ∼63% -15%
OnePlus 5
4423 Points ∼100% +36%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points ∼24% -68%
Honor 8
2556 Points ∼58% -22%
System (sort by value)
Honor 9
4154 Points ∼63%
Sony Xperia XZ
3047 Points ∼46% -27%
Huawei P10
3830 Points ∼58% -8%
OnePlus 5
5902 Points ∼90% +42%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points ∼44% -30%
Honor 8
3952 Points ∼60% -5%
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 9
2779 Points ∼73%
Sony Xperia XZ
2165 Points ∼57% -22%
Huawei P10
2621 Points ∼69% -6%
OnePlus 5
3790 Points ∼100% +36%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points ∼32% -56%
Honor 8
2034 Points ∼54% -27%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 9
6527 Points ∼35%
OnePlus 5
6799 Points ∼37% +4%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 9
1869 Points ∼39%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points ∼41% +6%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 9
2287 Points ∼76%
Sony Xperia XZ
1667 Points ∼55% -27%
Huawei P10
1902 Points ∼63% -17%
OnePlus 5
3026 Points ∼100% +32%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2109 Points ∼70% -8%
Honor 8
2482 Points ∼82% +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 9
2798 Points ∼52%
Sony Xperia XZ
2853 Points ∼53% +2%
Huawei P10
2409 Points ∼45% -14%
OnePlus 5
3757 Points ∼70% +34%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
380 Points ∼7% -86%
Honor 8
818 Points ∼15% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 9
2666 Points ∼69%
Sony Xperia XZ
2548 Points ∼66% -4%
Huawei P10
2274 Points ∼59% -15%
OnePlus 5
3566 Points ∼92% +34%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
465 Points ∼12% -83%
Honor 8
961 Points ∼25% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 9
1809 Points ∼60%
Sony Xperia XZ
1667 Points ∼55% -8%
Huawei P10
2193 Points ∼73% +21%
OnePlus 5
3012 Points ∼100% +67%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points ∼70% +17%
Honor 8
2587 Points ∼86% +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 9
2990 Points ∼39%
Sony Xperia XZ
4522 Points ∼58% +51%
Huawei P10
2816 Points ∼36% -6%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points ∼62% +59%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points ∼9% -76%
Honor 8
1112 Points ∼14% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 9
2611 Points ∼52%
Sony Xperia XZ
3275 Points ∼66% +25%
Huawei P10
2649 Points ∼53% +1%
OnePlus 5
4219 Points ∼85% +62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points ∼17% -68%
Honor 8
1273 Points ∼26% -51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 9
15150 Points ∼21%
Sony Xperia XZ
20772 Points ∼29% +37%
Huawei P10
15341 Points ∼21% +1%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points ∼27% +28%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points ∼22% +6%
Honor 8
15531 Points ∼22% +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 9
38979 Points ∼9%
Sony Xperia XZ
32056 Points ∼7% -18%
Huawei P10
35964 Points ∼8% -8%
OnePlus 5
58001 Points ∼13% +49%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points ∼3% -65%
Honor 8
22157 Points ∼5% -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 9
28883 Points ∼15%
Sony Xperia XZ
28603 Points ∼15% -1%
Huawei P10
27692 Points ∼14% -4%
OnePlus 5
40229 Points ∼20% +39%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points ∼7% -52%
Honor 8
20235 Points ∼10% -30%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 9
60 fps ∼5%
Sony Xperia XZ
88 fps ∼7% +47%
Huawei P10
69 fps ∼5% +15%
OnePlus 5
115 fps ∼9% +92%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps ∼2% -62%
Honor 8
41 fps ∼3% -32%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 9
55 fps ∼12%
Sony Xperia XZ
88 fps ∼19% +60%
Huawei P10
55 fps ∼12% 0%
OnePlus 5
60 fps ∼13% +9%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps ∼5% -62%
Honor 8
43 fps ∼9% -22%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 9
30 fps ∼6%
Sony Xperia XZ
40 fps ∼7% +33%
Huawei P10
30 fps ∼6% 0%
OnePlus 5
61 fps ∼11% +103%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps ∼2% -67%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼3% -37%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 9
28 fps ∼8%
Sony Xperia XZ
39 fps ∼11% +39%
Huawei P10
32 fps ∼9% +14%
OnePlus 5
56 fps ∼15% +100%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps ∼3% -65%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼5% -32%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 9
22 fps ∼5%
Sony Xperia XZ
31 fps ∼7% +41%
Huawei P10
24 fps ∼6% +9%
OnePlus 5
42 fps ∼10% +91%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 fps ∼1% -72%
Honor 8
10 fps ∼2% -55%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 9
22 fps ∼13%
Sony Xperia XZ
31 fps ∼18% +41%
Huawei P10
25 fps ∼14% +14%
OnePlus 5
41 fps ∼23% +86%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 fps ∼3% -72%
Honor 8
11 fps ∼6% -50%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 9
15 fps ∼4%
Sony Xperia XZ
20 fps ∼6% +33%
Huawei P10
15 fps ∼4% 0%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼7% +67%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3.4 fps ∼1% -77%
Honor 8
6.3 fps ∼2% -58%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 9
16 fps ∼0%
Sony Xperia XZ
19 fps ∼1% +19%
Huawei P10
16 fps ∼0% 0%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼1% +56%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3.4 fps ∼0% -79%
Honor 8
6.9 fps ∼0% -57%

Legend

 
Honor 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
OnePlus 5
71.6 Points ∼100% +22%
Honor 8
64.046 Points ∼89% +9%
Honor 9
58.6 Points ∼82%
Huawei P10
57.9 Points ∼81% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ
54.201 Points ∼76% -8%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
31.118 Points ∼43% -47%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 5
11945 Points ∼100% +17%
Honor 8
10692 Points ∼90% +5%
Huawei P10
10236 Points ∼86% 0%
Honor 9
10208 Points ∼85%
Sony Xperia XZ
9069 Points ∼76% -11%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4905 Points ∼41% -52%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
8041.4 ms * ∼100% -155%
Honor 9
3149 ms * ∼39%
Huawei P10
3128.7 ms * ∼39% +1%
Honor 8
2979 ms * ∼37% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ
2768 ms * ∼34% +12%
OnePlus 5
2621.7 ms * ∼33% +17%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
OnePlus 5
161 Points ∼100% +50%
Honor 8
138 Points ∼86% +29%
Huawei P10
136 Points ∼84% +27%
Honor 9
107 Points ∼66%
Sony Xperia XZ
90 Points ∼56% -16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
84 Points ∼52% -21%

* ... smaller is better

Honor 9Sony Xperia XZHuawei P10OnePlus 5Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KLHonor 8
AndroBench 3-5
-24%
114%
67%
1%
-26%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
34.64
29.8
-14%
32.19
-7%
50.07
45%
23.59
-32%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
67.99
33.5
-51%
54.22
-20%
79.22
17%
53.68
-21%
Random Write 4KB
32.7
10.5
-68%
152.31
366%
19.3
-41%
7.4
-77%
31.5
-4%
Random Read 4KB
55.7
71.5
28%
168.42
202%
141
153%
74
33%
34.16
-39%
Sequential Write 256KB
204
138
-32%
189.83
-7%
201.5
-1%
188
-8%
119.25
-42%
Sequential Read 256KB
293
281
-4%
737.65
152%
748
155%
282
-4%
247.46
-16%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 BeállításokÉrték
 high29 fps
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 BeállításokÉrték
 high45 fps
Max. terhelés
 44.8 °C45 °C42.8 °C 
 44.9 °C44.7 °C43.7 °C 
 43.4 °C43.8 °C42.4 °C 
Maximum: 45 °C
Átlag: 43.9 °C
39.4 °C41.5 °C44.4 °C
39.7 °C41.9 °C45.4 °C
40 °C42.3 °C43.4 °C
Maximum: 45.4 °C
Átlag: 42 °C
Tápegység (max.)  29.8 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.32525.430.73125.326.84032.926.45033.630.86331.629.58028.427.81002726.912520.825.31602240.220021.351.725020.854.931521.260.340019.462.550019.56363017.765.780017.967.1100017.866.4125017.368.8160017.470200016.774.7250017.276.5315018.276400017.977.3500017.677630017.776800017.875.31000017.970.81250018.162.91600018.248SPL3085.3N1.363.5median 17.9Honor 9median 66.4Delta1.310.331.632.825.430.425.332.132.933.333.63631.630.128.427.82725.420.825.62229.121.339.620.848.321.254.219.456.819.559.117.758.117.961.117.864.417.365.817.467.416.770.317.27118.277.117.979.117.673.517.772.117.87117.966.418.157.518.253.13084.71.353.4median 17.9Honor 8median 61.11.310.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Honor 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Honor 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.07 / 0.21 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 1.13 / 2.25 / 2.3 Watt
Terhelés midlight 4.89 / 7.99 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 9
3200 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ
2900 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-51%
-2%
12%
21%
17%
Idle Minimum *
1.13
1.76
-56%
0.83
27%
0.73
35%
0.83
27%
0.78
31%
Idle Average *
2.25
3.6
-60%
2.1
7%
1.44
36%
2.11
6%
1.89
16%
Idle Maximum *
2.3
4.06
-77%
2.18
5%
1.5
35%
2.12
8%
2.02
12%
Load Average *
4.89
7
-43%
6.57
-34%
6.91
-41%
3.41
30%
5.28
-8%
Load Maximum *
7.99
9.52
-19%
9.32
-17%
8.51
-7%
5.46
32%
5.44
32%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
23h 19min
WiFi böngészés v1.3
8h 36min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 24min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
4h 38min
Honor 9
3200 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ
2900 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-20%
16%
2%
37%
-3%
Reader / Idle
1399
1125
-20%
1540
10%
1534
10%
1502
7%
1487
6%
H.264
564
502
-11%
582
3%
623
10%
905
60%
526
-7%
WiFi v1.3
516
438
-15%
966
87%
518
0%
797
54%
499
-3%
Load
278
187
-33%
176
-37%
247
-11%
352
27%
255
-8%

Pro

+ nagyon jó ár/érték arány
+ gyönyörű, szilárd ház
+ gyors működés, sok opció
+ dual-SIM képes
+ USB-OTG
+ sokoldalú szoftver
+ gyors WLAN
+ pontos GPS
+ éles fotók
+ világos kijelző
+ gyors rendszer
+ remek hangszóró
+ gyakorlatban használható üzemidő

Kontra

- csak lassú eMMC flash
- bőséges bloatware
- viszonylag kevés LTE sáv
- eléggé melegszik
- tartós terhelés esetén lefojt
In the test: Honor 9. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.
In the test: Honor 9. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.

Ilyen az, ha az embernek gyönyörű lányai vannak: néha még az anyának is van mit irigyelnie. Legalábbis a Huawei nem könnyítette meg a P10  dolgát a némileg karcsúbb Honor 9-cel szemben. Több, mint 100 euróval (~$118) kevesebbért, a Honor 9 tényleg sokat ad a pénzünkért. Még a OnePlus 5-nek is van félnivalója.

Honor 8-hoz képest a gyönyörű ház ismét jobb lett, a teljesítmény a Huawei P10 szintjén van, és a kamera is majdnem olyan jó képeket készít. A Honor 9 csak háttértár sebesség, üzemidő, és az LTE kapcsolatok (száma és sebessége) terén marad el a Huawei csúcstelefonja mögött. Emellé a Huawei még 36 hónap jótállást is ad a P10-re.

Gyönyörű ház, jó kamera, megfelelő üzemidő - nem igazán van panaszunk a Honor 9-re. Ha a lapkakészlet nem fojtana le terhelés alatt, az ajánlásunk még határozottabb lenne, de a Honor 9 ár/érték aránya így is kiváló.

Lehet pár keresetlen szavunk a Huawei-re, amiért a hívásminőségre nem figyelt jobban, mivel azt maximum közepesnek mondhatjuk. Az erős melegedés és tartós terhelés esetén a lapkakészlet lefojtása idegesítőek. Ezt leszámítva azonban le a kalappal a Honor 9 előtt. Remek középkategóriás ajánlat, amelyet nem érdemes figyelmen kívül hagyni.

Aki pedig spórolni szeretne, annak a Honor 8 - amely gyakorlatilag ugyanezt a kamerát kínálja, és teljesítményben sem marad le nagyon - egy kiváló ajánlat, körülbelül 100 euróval (~$118) kevesebbért.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Honor 9 - 08/17/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Váz
92%
Billentyűzet
67 / 75 → 89%
Érintőpad
93%
Csatlakoztathatóság
48 / 60 → 80%
Súly
92%
Akkumulátor
91%
Kijelző
89%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
58 / 63 → 92%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
62 / 70 → 89%
Hőmérséklet
83%
Zaj
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
76%
Átlag
78%
88%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Honor 9 Smartphone rövid értékelés
Florian Wimmer, 2017-08-24 (Update: 2017-08-24)