Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 (i5-8250U MX150) rövid értékelés

Name: Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 (i5-8250U MX150) rövid értékelés
Item: Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018
Rating: 85
Author: Klaus Hinum, Daniel Puschina

Klaus Hinum, Daniel Puschina, 👁 Klaus Hinum, ✓ Klaus Hinum (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 03/29/2018

Laptop / Notebook Windows Geforce

Frissítés. Négymagos processzorral és MX150-nel felszerelt notebook, amely alig 1,3 kg-ot nyom - a kínai gyártó frissítette az Air legutóbbi modelljét, hogy egy szintre hozza a Mi Notebook Pro-val. A megegyező specifikációk ellenére a két gép teljesítménye eltérő, ezt tesztünk is ékesen bizonyította.

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja

Size Comparison

Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 HP Envy 13-ad006ng Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5

Right side: charging LED, USB-C (3.1 Gen 1, PowerDelivery, DisplayPort 4K 60Hz), USB 3.0

Left side: HDMI 1.4 (max. 4K 30Hz), USB 3.0, headset

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac	845 MBit/s ∼100% +39%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	634 MBit/s ∼75% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	609 MBit/s ∼72%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	588 MBit/s ∼70% -3%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	585 MBit/s ∼69% -4%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	547 MBit/s ∼65% -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (71 - 950, n=87)	527 MBit/s ∼62% -13%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	522 MBit/s ∼62% -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	326 MBit/s ∼39% -46%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	308 MBit/s ∼36% -49%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac	949 MBit/s ∼100% +93%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	682 MBit/s ∼72% +39%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	655 MBit/s ∼69% +33%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	580 MBit/s ∼61% +18%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	557 MBit/s ∼59% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	525 MBit/s ∼55% +7%
Average of class Subnotebook (72 - 949, n=87)	519 MBit/s ∼55% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	492 MBit/s ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	471 MBit/s ∼50% -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	295 MBit/s ∼31% -40%


362 cd/m²	373 cd/m²	364 cd/m²
346 cd/m²	370 cd/m²	354 cd/m²
345 cd/m²	336 cd/m²	343 cd/m²

Fényerő megoszlás

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 373 cd/m² Átlag: 354.8 cd/m² Minimum: 26 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 90 %
Centrumban: 370 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1609:1 (Fekete: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.9 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 1.4
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 1.76

ICC Fájl (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 SHARP LQ133M1JW15, , 1920x1080, 13.3	Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN AU Optronics B133HAN04.9, , 1920x1080, 13.3	Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13IKB LG Philips LGD04EF, , 1920x1080, 13.3	HP Envy 13-ad006ng BOE070E, , 1920x1080, 13.3	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 APPA034, , 2560x1600, 13.3	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 15.6	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Samsung LTN133HL09-M01, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times		4%	-4%	108%	17985%		-31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	39.6 (18.4, 21.2)	44 (22, 22) -11%	35 (17, 18) 12%	48 (23, 25) -21%	48 (23.6, 24.4) -21%		49 (20, 29) -24%
Response Time Black / White *	29.3 (14.8, 14.5)	24 (13, 11) 18%	25 (14, 11) 15%	32 (17, 15) -9%	33.6 (16.4, 17.2) -15%		27 (8, 19) 8%
PWM Frequency	220 (18, 100)		131 (90) -40%	1000 (90) 355%	119000 (80) 53991%		50 (30) -77%
Screen		7%	-13%	-2%	27%	-0%	13%
Brightness middle	370	329 -11%	335 -9%	281 -24%	551 49%	317 -14%	347 -6%
Brightness	355	306 -14%	303 -15%	264 -26%	514 45%		334 -6%
Brightness Distribution	90	86 -4%	85 -6%	83 -8%	88 -2%		80 -11%
Black Level *	0.23	0.3 -30%	0.46 -100%	0.23 -0%	0.48 -109%	0.352 -53%	0.27 -17%
Contrast	1609	1097 -32%	728 -55%	1222 -24%	1148 -29%	901 -44%	1285 -20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	6.9	4.07 41%	5.09 26%	4.83 30%	0.8 88%	4.5 35%	3.29 52%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	12.2	7.05 42%	11.92 2%	8.89 27%	1.4 89%	9 26%	4.69 62%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *	1.4
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	7.4	2.76 63%	3.23 56%	6.63 10%	1 86%	3.8 49%	3.62 51%
Gamma	1.76 ^125%	2.56 ^86%	2.18 ^101%	1.85 ^119%	2.16 ^102%	2.17 ^101%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	7529 ^86%	6915 ^94%	6214 ^105%	6794 ^96%	6672 ^97%		7307 ^89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		56	54	56			62
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		86	82	86			95
Total Average (Program / Settings)		6% / 6%	-9% / -10%	53% / 28%	9006% / 4925%	0% / -0%	-9% / 1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.8 ms rise
29.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.5 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.4 ms rise
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

220 Hz

≤ 18 % brightness setting

≤ 100 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 220 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 18 % (100 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 220 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

Flickering occurs at relatively low brightness settings, so extended use at this brightness setting or lower can cause eyestrain.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8929 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 Intel Core i7-8550U	170 Points ∼100% +18%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN Intel Core i7-8550U	150 Points ∼88% +4%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng Intel Core i7-7500U	145 Points ∼85% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Intel Core i5-8250U	145 (min: 144.66, max: 144.78) Points ∼85% +1%
HP Spectre 13-af033ng Intel Core i7-8550U	145 Points ∼85% +1%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 Intel Core i5-8250U	144 Points ∼85% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 Intel Core i5-8250U	144 (min: 143.11, max: 143.49) Points ∼85%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 Intel Core i5-7267U	141 Points ∼83% -2%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (81 - 167, n=87)	141 Points ∼83% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB Intel Core i5-8250U	132 Points ∼78% -8%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Core i5-6200U	118 Points ∼69% -18%
Average of class Subnotebook (20 - 174, n=235)	112 Points ∼66% -22%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 Intel Core i7-8550U	723 Points ∼100% +39%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 Intel Core i5-8250U	669 Points ∼93% +28%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN Intel Core i7-8550U	630 Points ∼87% +21%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Intel Core i5-8250U	576 (min: 544.28, max: 575.47) Points ∼80% +10%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (320 - 730, n=90)	567 Points ∼78% +9%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 Intel Core i5-8250U	522 (min: 490.92, max: 522.49) Points ∼72%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB Intel Core i5-8250U	516 Points ∼71% -1%
HP Spectre 13-af033ng Intel Core i7-8550U	515 Points ∼71% -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 Intel Core i5-7267U	383 (min: 377, max: 385) Points ∼53% -27%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng Intel Core i7-7500U	353 Points ∼49% -32%
Average of class Subnotebook (32 - 721, n=242)	308 Points ∼43% -41%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Core i5-6200U	294 Points ∼41% -44%

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

3841

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5542

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

16272

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

5.87 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.79 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

73.88 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

144 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.62 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

88.16 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

522 Points

Segítség

... összehasonlítva

Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø497 (490.92-522.49)

Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø548 (544.28-575.47)

Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00 Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø538 (523.46-671.14)

Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø593 (543-676.82)

Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø490 (484.71-533.5)

Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø470 (392.82-506.64)

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	4906 Points ∼100% +2%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng GeForce MX150, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	4900 Points ∼100% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00 UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4868 Points ∼99% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	4826 Points ∼98% 0%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	4811 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4811 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (4339 - 4992, n=10)	4772 Points ∼97% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4746 Points ∼97% -1%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	4563 Points ∼93% -5%
HP Spectre 13-af033ng UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	4562 Points ∼93% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	4274 Points ∼87% -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 Iris Plus Graphics 650, 7267U, Apple SSD AP0256	4081 Points ∼83% -15%
Average of class Subnotebook (1283 - 5363, n=177)	3957 Points ∼81% -18%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	3994 Points ∼100% +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 Iris Plus Graphics 650, 7267U, Apple SSD AP0256	3829 Points ∼96% +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	3796 Points ∼95% +4%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	3780 Points ∼95% +3%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng GeForce MX150, 7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	3773 Points ∼94% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3766 Points ∼94% +3%
HP Spectre 13-af033ng UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	3705 Points ∼93% +1%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (3274 - 3935, n=10)	3687 Points ∼92% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3656 Points ∼92%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00 UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	3574 Points ∼89% -2%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	3197 Points ∼80% -13%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	3144 Points ∼79% -14%
Average of class Subnotebook (1027 - 4182, n=204)	2996 Points ∼75% -18%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3656 pontok
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5244 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4811 pontok
Segítség

	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	HP Envy 13-ad006ng Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	Average Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-51%	5%	-36%	-16%	-15%	4%
Write 4k QD32	325.01	257.2 -21%	475 46%	161.3 -50%	339.86 5%	312.2 -4%	389 (94.9 - 621, n=40) 20%
Read 4k QD32	425.88	356.8 -16%	536.6 26%	494.6 16%	381.77 -10%	487.6 14%	426 (132 - 650, n=40) 0%
Write 4k	146.89	78.63 -46%	142.6 -3%	109.4 -26%	127.49 -13%	153.4 4%	129 (46.6 - 177, n=40) -12%
Read 4k	59.22	30.37 -49%	56.77 -4%	34.5 -42%	34.18 -42%	43.4 -27%	53.3 (29.8 - 62.6, n=40) -10%
Write 512	842.9	256.6 -70%	636 -25%	172.3 -80%	353.88 -58%		781 (338 - 890, n=40) -7%
Read 512	750.73	258.1 -66%	820.7 9%	735 -2%	839.63 12%		892 (406 - 1295, n=40) 19%
Write Seq	1159.9	263 -77%	1010 -13%	195.4 -83%	352.7 -70%	314 -73%	1127 (341 - 1409, n=40) -3%
Read Seq	1287.8	435.6 -66%	1372 7%	1019 -21%	1875.2 46%	1209 -6%	1626 (800 - 2196, n=40) 26%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP

Sequential Read: 1287.8 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1159.9 MB/s

512K Read: 750.73 MB/s

512K Write: 842.9 MB/s

4K Read: 59.22 MB/s

4K Write: 146.89 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 425.88 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 325.01 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (2796 - 4905, n=42)	4184 Points ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	3539.5 (min: 3537, max: 3543) Points ∼85%
Average of class Subnotebook (230 - 4905, n=323)	1185 Points ∼28% -67%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (2323 - 3739, n=39)	3309 Points ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	2873 (min: 2870, max: 2876) Points ∼87%
Average of class Subnotebook (222 - 3726, n=209)	964 Points ∼29% -66%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (16227 - 22183, n=38)	19450 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	18120 (min: 18100, max: 18140) Points ∼93%
Average of class Subnotebook (1484 - 21755, n=233)	7058 Points ∼36% -61%

3DMark 06 Standard		19210 pontok
3DMark 11 Performance		3819.5 pontok
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		12569 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score		2616.5 pontok
Segítség

... összehasonlítva

Clock Speed
1280x720 GPU Clock Speed Furmark 1.19 GPU Stress Test
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5	1177 MHz ∼100% +45%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7	1177 MHz ∼100% +45%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018	813 MHz ∼69%
GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7	1620 MHz ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5	1476 MHz ∼91% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018	1290 MHz ∼80%
GPU Clock Speed GPU-Z Render Test (max.)
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7	1721 MHz ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5	1695 MHz ∼98% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018	1658 MHz ∼96%

Temperatures
GPU Temperature Witcher 3 ultra
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018	63 °C ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7	58 °C ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5	55 °C ∼87% -13%
1280x720 GPU Temperature Furmark 1.19
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018	64 °C ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7	55 °C ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5	50 °C ∼78% -22%

Legend

Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP

Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP

Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP

Civilization VI
1920x1080 High Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	26.7 (99th percentile: 18.8) fps ∼100% +32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (19.5 - 26.7, n=4)	21.8 fps ∼82% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	20.3 (min: 14, max: 35) fps ∼76%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	19.47 fps ∼73% -4%
Average of class Subnotebook (15.8 - 20.3, n=2)	18.1 fps ∼68% -11%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	53 (99th percentile: 34.2) fps ∼100% +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (42.9 - 53, n=4)	47.9 fps ∼90% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	44.8 (min: 30, max: 78) fps ∼85%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	42.87 fps ∼81% -4%
Average of class Subnotebook (5.2 - 44.8, n=7)	20.8 fps ∼39% -54%
1024x768 Minimum Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (75.5 - 87.7, n=4)	79.1 fps ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	77.3 (99th percentile: 64) fps ∼98% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	76 (min: 54, max: 121) fps ∼96%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	75.52 fps ∼95% -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (12.2 - 76, n=7)	41.9 fps ∼53% -45%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	32.2 (min: 22, max: 41) fps ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	29.3 (min: 6, max: 40) fps ∼91%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (23 - 35, n=6)	28.9 fps ∼90% -1%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	28.3 fps ∼88% -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (9.3 - 29.3, n=5)	18.4 fps ∼57% -37%

Rainbow Six Siege
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (18.3 - 31.3, n=4)	24.8 fps ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	24.3 (min: 7, max: 38) fps ∼98%
Average of class Subnotebook (10.8 - 24.3, n=9)	15 fps ∼60% -38%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:4x
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (37.9 - 45.8, n=4)	41 fps ∼100% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	38 (min: 21, max: 66) fps ∼93%
Average of class Subnotebook (12.1 - 38, n=13)	20.1 fps ∼49% -47%
1366x768 Medium Preset AA:T AF:2x
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (69.7 - 87, n=4)	77.4 fps ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	74 (min: 41, max: 121) fps ∼96%
Average of class Subnotebook (8.9 - 74, n=17)	31.4 fps ∼41% -58%

The Division
1920x1080 High Preset AF:8x
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (17.5 - 22.4, n=3)	20 fps ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	17.5 (min: 7, max: 23) fps ∼88%
Average of class Subnotebook	17.5 fps ∼88% 0%
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:4x
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (38.1 - 47.1, n=3)	42.7 fps ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	38.1 (min: 28, max: 53) fps ∼89%
Average of class Subnotebook (7.5 - 38.1, n=8)	17.8 fps ∼42% -53%
1280x720 Low Preset AF:1x
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (59.5 - 75, n=3)	66.6 fps ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	59.5 (min: 46, max: 74) fps ∼89%
Average of class Subnotebook (4.3 - 59.5, n=11)	25.7 fps ∼39% -57%

Overwatch
1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Hynix HFS128G39TND	41.9 fps ∼100% +56%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (25.1 - 41.9, n=9)	31.2 fps ∼74% +16%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	30.3 (min: 25, max: 36) fps ∼72% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	29.8 fps ∼71% +11%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	27.5 fps ∼66% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	26.9 (min: 22, max: 32) fps ∼64%
Average of class Subnotebook (18.2 - 26.9, n=5)	22.2 fps ∼53% -17%
1920x1080 High (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:4x
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Hynix HFS128G39TND	66.8 fps ∼100% +56%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (38.2 - 74.5, n=9)	51.1 fps ∼76% +19%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	48 (min: 39, max: 58) fps ∼72% +12%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	46.1 fps ∼69% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	46 fps ∼69% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	42.9 (min: 36, max: 49) fps ∼64%
Average of class Subnotebook (13.9 - 43, n=13)	25.7 fps ∼38% -40%

For Honor
1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (19.4 - 22.5, n=3)	21.1 fps ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	19.4 (min: 15, max: 27) fps ∼92%
Average of class Subnotebook	19.4 fps ∼92% 0%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (25.2 - 30.7, n=3)	28.4 fps ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	25.2 (min: 20, max: 33) fps ∼89%
Average of class Subnotebook	25.2 fps ∼89% 0%
1280x720 Low Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (60 - 91, n=4)	77.4 fps ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	60 (min: 50, max: 66) fps ∼78%
Average of class Subnotebook (0 - 73.3, n=10)	28.6 fps ∼37% -52%

Ghost Recon Wildlands - 1280x720 Low Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (39.5 - 54, n=3)	47.2 fps ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	39.5 (min: 31, max: 45) fps ∼84%
Average of class Subnotebook (3.2 - 39.5, n=7)	16.4 fps ∼35% -58%

Rocket League
1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (37.8 - 43.8, n=4)	41.2 fps ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	39.9 (min: 32, max: 56) fps ∼97%
Average of class Subnotebook (14.5 - 39.9, n=10)	26.8 fps ∼65% -33%
1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (54.3 - 69.1, n=4)	62.3 fps ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	57.1 (min: 48, max: 75) fps ∼92%
Average of class Subnotebook (9.9 - 57.1, n=11)	36.1 fps ∼58% -37%
1280x720 Performance
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	156 (min: 126, max: 202) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (128 - 160, n=3)	148 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (26.8 - 156, n=11)	84.7 fps ∼54% -46%

Middle-earth: Shadow of War
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	13 (min: 3, max: 105) fps ∼100% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (11 - 14, n=6)	12 fps ∼92% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	11.1 (min: 7, max: 16) fps ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	11 (min: 3, max: 33) fps ∼85% -1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	11 fps ∼85% -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (9 - 11.1, n=2)	10.1 fps ∼78% -9%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	17 (min: 3, max: 62) fps ∼100% +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (14 - 20, n=6)	16.4 fps ∼96% +12%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	15 fps ∼88% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	14.6 (min: 3, max: 52) fps ∼86%
Average of class Subnotebook (14 - 14.6, n=2)	14.3 fps ∼84% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	14 (min: 3, max: 46) fps ∼82% -4%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	27.7 (min: 14, max: 31) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (21 - 28, n=6)	25.3 fps ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	24 (min: 15, max: 42) fps ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	23 (min: 13, max: 39) fps ∼83% -17%
Average of class Subnotebook (18 - 27.7, n=2)	22.9 fps ∼83% -17%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	21 fps ∼76% -24%
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (47 - 73, n=6)	60.1 fps ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	60 (min: 34, max: 117) fps ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	56.3 (min: 34, max: 104) fps ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	53 (min: 22, max: 131) fps ∼88% -6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	47 fps ∼78% -17%
Average of class Subnotebook (7 - 56.3, n=4)	30.3 fps ∼50% -46%

Destiny 2
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:FX AF:2x
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	29.7 (99th percentile: 18.8) fps ∼100%
Average of class Subnotebook (28.2 - 29.7, n=2)	29 fps ∼98% -2%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	28.2 fps ∼95% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (10.8 - 34.7, n=4)	25.9 fps ∼87% -13%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	10.8 fps ∼36% -64%
1280x720 Low Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	51.6 (99th percentile: 27.2) fps ∼100%
Average of class Subnotebook (48.4 - 51.6, n=2)	50 fps ∼97% -3%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	48.4 fps ∼94% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (29.1 - 62.2, n=4)	47.8 fps ∼93% -7%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	29.1 fps ∼56% -44%

Assassin´s Creed Origins
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	20 (min: 7, max: 25) fps ∼100% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (18 - 22, n=3)	20 fps ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	18 (min: 2, max: 39) fps ∼90%
Average of class Subnotebook	18 fps ∼90% 0%
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (42 - 47, n=3)	44.3 fps ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	44 (min: 6, max: 68) fps ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	42 (min: 22, max: 77) fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 44, n=2)	28.5 fps ∼64% -35%

Kingdom Come: Deliverance
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (18.4 - 22.1, n=2)	20.3 fps ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	18.4 (min: 14, max: 21) fps ∼91%
Average of class Subnotebook	18.4 fps ∼91% 0%
1280x720 Low Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (40.1 - 51.6, n=2)	45.9 fps ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	40.1 (min: 30, max: 47) fps ∼87%
Average of class Subnotebook	40.1 fps ∼87% 0%

X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	52.3 fps ∼100% +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (41.8 - 52.3, n=2)	47.1 fps ∼90% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	41.8 fps ∼80%
Average of class Subnotebook	41.8 fps ∼80% 0%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	56 fps ∼100% +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (46 - 56, n=2)	51 fps ∼91% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	46 fps ∼82%
Average of class Subnotebook	46 fps ∼82% 0%
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	82.7 fps ∼100% +45%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (57 - 82.7, n=2)	69.9 fps ∼85% +23%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	57 fps ∼69%
Average of class Subnotebook (0 - 57, n=4)	17.2 fps ∼21% -70%

	alacsony	közepes	magas	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)				29.7	fps
The Witcher 3 (2015)				9.7	fps
World of Warships (2015)				42.1	fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)		74	38	24.3	fps
The Division (2016)	59.5	38.1	17 severe graphical problems		fps
Overwatch (2016)			42.9	26.9	fps
Civilization VI (2016)	76	44.8	20.3		fps
For Honor (2017)	60	26.5	25.2	19.4	fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)	39.5	18.8			fps
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017)	60				fps
Rocket League (2017)	156	57.1	39.9		fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)	56.3	27.7	14.6	11.1	fps
Destiny 2 (2017)	51.6	29.7			fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017)	44	18			fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	29.3				fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)	40.1	18.4			fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	57	46	41.8		fps

; The Witcher 3: Ø9.11 (2-12)

Zajszint

Üresjárat		30.6 / 30.6 / 31.4 dB(A)
Terhelés		43.6 / 44.2 dB(A)

	30 dB csendes 40 dB(A) hallható 50 dB(A) hangos
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)

Max. terhelés

Üresjárat

Witcher 3


49 °C	50 °C	44 °C
48 °C	44 °C	35 °C
34 °C	30 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 50 °C
Átlag: 40.4 °C


41 °C	44 °C	47 °C
35 °C	42 °C	44 °C
33 °C	37 °C	37 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Átlag: 40 °C

Szobahőmérséklet 20.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini / Flir / Fluke 43 II B

Max. terhelés

Üresjárat

Witcher 3


26 °C	27 °C	26 °C
26 °C	26 °C	26 °C
25 °C	25 °C	25 °C

Maximum: 27 °C
Átlag: 25.8 °C


26 °C	26 °C	27 °C
27 °C	27 °C	28 °C
28 °C	28 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 28 °C
Átlag: 27.1 °C

Tápegység (max.) 27 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 20.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini / Flir / Fluke 43 II B

Max. terhelés

Üresjárat

Witcher 3


45 °C	44 °C	39 °C
41 °C	40 °C	31 °C
31 °C	28 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Átlag: 36.3 °C


42 °C	44 °C	45 °C
41 °C	42 °C	36 °C
32 °C	34 °C	35 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Átlag: 39 °C

Tápegység (max.) 43 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 19.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.3 °C / 105 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-5.3 °C / -9.5 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3	Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN 8550U, GeForce MX150, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3	Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB 8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3	HP Envy 13-ad006ng 7500U, GeForce MX150, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 7267U, Iris Plus Graphics 650, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3	Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 6200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3	Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	Average of class Subnotebook
Power Consumption		20%	-0%	7%	-22%	17%	3%	-11%	-26%
Idle Minimum *	3.9	2.2 44%	3.4 13%	2.8 28%	2.8 28%	3.14 19%	4 -3%	3.97 (3.4 - 4.8, n=10) -2%	6.84 (1 - 36, n=560) -75%
Idle Average *	7	5 29%	6.1 13%	5.8 17%	10.9 -56%	5.22 25%	6.6 6%	7.34 (6.1 - 8.9, n=10) -5%	10.1 (2.06 - 39, n=560) -44%
Idle Maximum *	7.5	8 -7%	7.7 -3%	7.7 -3%	11.4 -52%	6 20%	7.4 1%	9.14 (7.5 - 12.3, n=10) -22%	12.4 (3.9 - 55, n=560) -65%
Load Average *	44.4	33 26%	44.2 -0%	48 -8%	55.4 -25%	38.5 13%	41.7 6%	50.2 (37.3 - 61, n=10) -13%	33.4 (6.3 - 75, n=550) 25%
Load Maximum *	55.1	49.4 10%	60.3 -9%	48 13%	57.5 -4%	50.4 9%	52.4 5%	61.2 (52.1 - 86, n=10) -11%	40.4 (7.6 - 111, n=553) 27%
Witcher 3 ultra *	32.8		37.6 -15%	35 -7%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő

Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)		12h 59min
Battery Runtime The Witcher 3 ultra		1h 21min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		6h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 57min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)		1h 17min

	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 8250U, GeForce MX150, 39 Wh	Asus ZenBook 13 UX331UN 8550U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB 8250U, GeForce MX150, 36 Wh	HP Envy 13-ad006ng 7500U, GeForce MX150, 51 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 7267U, Iris Plus Graphics 650, 49.2 Wh	Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 40 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		38%	-11%	31%	6%	72%	-1%	15%
Reader / Idle	779	1240 59%	736 -6%	1198 54%		1417 82%	718 -8%	599 (87 - 2557, n=528) -23%
H.264	477	534 12%	346 -27%	476 0%	415 -13%	831 74%	423 -11%	459 (182 - 950, n=102) -4%
WiFi v1.3	368	538 46%	344 -7%	425 15%	519 41%	644 75%	389 6%	464 (206 - 805, n=176) 26%
Witcher 3 ultra	81							96.7 (81 - 115, n=3) 19%
Load	77	105 36%	73 -5%	118 53%	70 -9%	119 55%	83 8%	122 (40 - 347, n=532) 58%

Pro

+ kiváló minőségű ház

+ elég jó beviteli eszközök

+ világos...

Kontra

- ...de tükröződő kijelző

- hőlefojtás

- az egyetlen USB-C port a töltőcsatlakozó is

- erősen melegszik

- sokkal lassabb, mint a Mi Notebook Pro 15

- bonyolult jótállási helyzet

Az egyik legfontosabb érv amellett, hogy egyenesen Kínából rendeljünk valamilyen készüléket, általában az alacsony ár. Mivel ez a notebook még nem kapható Kínán kívül, ezért egy sor akadályt kell leküzdenünk a beszerzésekor. Az első az a tény, hogy a döntést értékelések alapján kell meghoznunk, mivel nem tudjuk kézbe venni a készüléket a szomszéd szakboltban. A minőségről annyit elmondhatunk, hogy az általunk tesztelt példány esetében ez több, mint elfogadható volt. Azt viszont mindenképpen érdemes szem előtt tartanunk, hogy a szállítással, vámmal, mindennel együtt a végére a termék valószínűleg jóval drágább lesz az alap áránál, és ha garanciaigényünket próbáljuk érvényesíteni a világ túlfeléről, az könnyen rémálomba fordulhat. Ha pedig a készüléket megvettük, kifizettük, és megérkezett, szembesülünk a kínai Windows-szal, amelyet le kell cserélnünk egy angol verzióra, ha véletlenül nem értünk kínaiul.

Összességében, az MX150-nel felszerelt Mi Notebook Air elég jó gép. A vékony és kompakt ház ellenére képes rövid időkre nagy CPU teljesítményt mutatni, a GPU meg több mai játékot is elbír.

Sajnos a hő- és a zajszint terhelés alatt túl magas volt, a Mi Notebook Air határozottan jobban járt volna egy új, áttervezett házzal. A magas burkolathőmérséklet, lefojtás, és a CPU hamar bekövetkező teljesítményesései egyértelműen jelezték, hogy a ház és hűtés nem bír az erős alkatrészekkel. Az, hogy a 10 W-os, MX150-es konfigot választottuk, szintén nem sokat segített a helyzeten, ha nagyobb teljesítményre vágyunk, a 15 inches modell jobb választás lehet.

A világos, 13 inches kijelző nagyon jól teljesített, bár designjából adódóan kültéren erősen tükröződött. Azok, akik a notebookot főleg helyhez kötve, külső kijelzővel tervezik használni, jobb ha szem előtt tartják a HDMI port 30 Hz-es korlátját. Eközben viszont az USB-C port, amely 60 Hz-et támogat, valószínűleg éppen a hálózatra lesz dugva. Az üzemidő átlag alatti, és nagyjából egy szinten van elődjéével.

Ebben az árfekvésben, más 13 inchesek, amelyek MX150-est kaptak, ritkák, ez teszi ezt a gépet sokkal érdekesebbé. A Lenovo IdeaPad 320S (13 inch, Core i5-8250U) jelentősen lassabb volt minden GPU és CPU benchmark tesztben, a HP Envy 13 pedig ugyan lépést tudott tartani az Air GPU teljesítményével (szintén MX150 GPU), lemaradt az öregebb kétmagos Core i7-7500U CPU miatt, és 32%-kal alacsonyabb pontszámot kapott a Cinebench többmagos tesztjében. A PCMark pontszámaik viszont hasonlóak voltak. Ugyanakkor az Intel 7. generációs CPU-ja öregecske már 2018-ban.

Azaz, ha megfizethető, és valamennyire játék-képes 13 inches subnotebookot keresünk, és nem rettent el az esetleg kalandos import Kínából, úgy a Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air tökéletes beszerzés lehet. Ennek ellenére a leendő vevőknek azt tanácsoljuk, hogy a 15 inches Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro-ra (Core i5-8250U, GeForce MX150) is vessenek egy pillantást, mivel annak sokkal jobb hűtése van.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 - 2018-03-2003/20/2018 v6
Klaus Hinum, Daniel Puschina

Váz

88 / 98 → 90%

Billentyűzet

84%

Érintőpad

88%

Csatlakoztathatóság

47 / 80 → 59%

Súly

71 / 35-78 → 84%

Akkumulátor

89%

Kijelző

79%

Játékok alatti teljesítmény

73 / 68 → 100%

Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény

92 / 87 → 100%

Hőmérséklet

86 / 91 → 94%

Zaj

83%

Audio

75 / 91 → 82%

Camera

34 / 85 → 40%

Átlag

74%

85%

Subnotebook - Súlyozott átlag

Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 (i5-8250U MX150) rövid értékelés

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018 audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pro

Kontra

Pricecompare