Notebookcheck

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 Tablet rövid értékelés

Egy minden(ki)ért. A Samsung jó ideje nem frissítette prémium tabletjét. Emiatt különösen kíváncsiak voltunk az új készülékre, amely sokat tud, és még S Pen-t is kapott. A tablet meggyőzően teljesített tesztünk során, de a Samsung-nak nem sikerült mindenben a prémium szintet hoznia.
Daniel Schmidt (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Tablet Touchscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 (Galaxy Tab S Széria)
Processzor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 4 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 530, Mag: 624 MHz
Memória
4096 MB 
Kijelző
9.70 hüvelyk 4:3, 2048 x 1526 pixel 263 PPI, kapacitív érintőkijelző, native pen support, Super AMOLED, HDR, fényes: igen
Háttértár
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.1 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 3.0, Audió csatlakozók: kombinált fejhallgató/mikrofon jack (3.5 mm), Kártyaolvasó: microSD, max. 256 GB, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: gyorsulásmérő, helyzetérzékelő, forgásszenzor, színspektrum érzékelő, Hall-szenzor, G-szenzor, BeiDou, Galileo, Wifi Direct, Ant+
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 és 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (AWS (B4), 850, 900, 1900 és 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (sávok: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 17, 20, 28 and 40), LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 6 x 237.3 x 169
Akkumulátor
6000 mAh Lítium-Ion, Quick Charge 3.0, Akkumulátor üzemidő (gyártói adat): 12 h
Operációs rendszer
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: 4 sztereo hangszóró, Billentyűzet: virtuális, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, hálózati adapter, USB kábel, S Pen, Samsung Smart Switch, Samsung Notes, Air Command, Samsung Flow, 24 Hónap Garancia, USB-C (3.1 Gen. 1), test SAR: 0.993 W/kg, fanless
Súly
434 g
Ár
769 Euró
Hivatkozások
Samsung noteszgépek
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE

» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép 
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja

Size Comparison

❌
259.1 mm 156.4 mm 8.5 mm 461 g256.6 mm 170.8 mm 9.6 mm 690 g242 mm 179 mm 7 mm 517 g241 mm 164 mm 5.8 mm 430 g240 mm 169.5 mm 6.1 mm 444 g237.3 mm 169 mm 6 mm 434 g237.3 mm 169 mm 5.6 mm 387 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
615 MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
465 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
254 MBit/s ∼41% -59%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
209 MBit/s ∼34% -66%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
569 MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
389 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
246 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
209 MBit/s ∼37% -63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 (SM-T825)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 (SM-T825)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 (SM-T825)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 (SM-T825)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 (SM-T825)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 (SM-T825)
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
433
cd/m²		438
cd/m²		472
cd/m²
442
cd/m²		452
cd/m²		488
cd/m²
476
cd/m²		487
cd/m²		526
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 526 cd/m² Átlag: 468.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.56 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 82 %
Centrumban: 452 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.06% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 82.32% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.11
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Super AMOLED, 2048x1526, 9.70		Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 9.70		Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10		Apple iPad Pro 9.7
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.70		Google Pixel C
LTPS, 2560x1800, 10.20		Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.70		Apple iPad (2017)
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.70
Screen
-11%
-94%
11%
-145%
-141%
-0%
Brightness middle
452
358
-21%
392
-13%
523
16%
487
8%
489
8%
514
14%
Brightness
468
357
-24%
385
-18%
500
7%
510
9%
443
-5%
485
4%
Brightness Distribution
82
86
5%
91
11%
93
13%
91
11%
86
5%
88
7%
Black Level *
0.59
0.52
0.39
0.43
0.46
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.8
1.78
1%
4.5
-150%
1.1
39%
5.24
-191%
5.5
-206%
1.4
22%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4
7.8
-95%
1.9
52%
11.6
-190%
2.9
27%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.2
1.38
-15%
4.8
-300%
1.4
-17%
7.95
-563%
6.7
-458%
2.1
-75%
Gamma
2.11 104%
2.24 98%
2.47 89%
2.11 104%
2.16 102%
2.06 107%
2.22 99%
CCT
6500 100%
6366 102%
7426 88%
6662 98%
6565 99%
7457 87%
6647 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.32
62.97
-24%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.06
99.55
0%
Contrast
664
1006
1249
1137
1117

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 221.2 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 221.2 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 221.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9714 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

vs. sRGB (99.06 %)
vs. sRGB (99.06 %)
vs. AdobeRGB (82.32 %)
vs. AdobeRGB (82.32 %)

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).
AnTuTu v6 | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | Geekbench 4.0 | Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal | ANDEBench PRO | Epic Citadel
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
168840 Points ∼58% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼56% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
144426 Points ∼49%
Apple iPad (2017)
128706 Points ∼44% -11%
Google Pixel C
90568 Points ∼31% -37%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
88989 Points ∼30% -38%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
86735 Points ∼30% -40%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
74177 Points ∼25% -49%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
29823 Points ∼10% -79%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
117.1 fps ∼1% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼1% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
92 fps ∼1%
Apple iPad (2017)
80.8 fps ∼1% -12%
Google Pixel C
69 fps ∼1% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
38 fps ∼0% -59%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
31 fps ∼0% -66%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
29 fps ∼0% -68%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
29 fps ∼0% -68%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
14 fps ∼0% -85%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
59.4 fps ∼2% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
59 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼2% -2%
Apple iPad (2017)
56 fps ∼2% -5%
Google Pixel C
39 fps ∼1% -34%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
31 fps ∼1% -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
29 fps ∼1% -51%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
23 fps ∼1% -61%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
23 fps ∼1% -61%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
13 fps ∼0% -78%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
51 fps ∼6% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼5% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
48 fps ∼5%
Apple iPad (2017)
40.6 fps ∼4% -15%
Google Pixel C
40 fps ∼4% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
17 fps ∼2% -65%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
14 fps ∼2% -71%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
14 fps ∼2% -71%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
13 fps ∼1% -73%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
5.6 fps ∼1% -88%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼10% +12%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
35.1 fps ∼10% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
34 fps ∼9%
Apple iPad (2017)
28.7 fps ∼8% -16%
Google Pixel C
22 fps ∼6% -35%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
15 fps ∼4% -56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
12 fps ∼3% -65%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
9.7 fps ∼3% -71%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
9 fps ∼2% -74%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
5.2 fps ∼1% -85%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼1% +31%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
39.5 fps ∼1% +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
32 fps ∼1%
Google Pixel C
31 fps ∼1% -3%
Apple iPad (2017)
28.5 fps ∼1% -11%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
7.7 fps ∼0% -76%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
7.2 fps ∼0% -77%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
26.9 fps ∼1% +42%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼1% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
19 fps ∼1%
Apple iPad (2017)
18.5 fps ∼1% -3%
Google Pixel C
13 fps ∼0% -32%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
7 fps ∼0% -63%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
4.2 fps ∼0% -78%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps ∼0% -100%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25 fps ∼6% +32%
Google Pixel C
24 fps ∼6% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
19 fps ∼4%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
4.8 fps ∼1% -75%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
13 fps ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
13 fps ∼5% 0%
Google Pixel C
12 fps ∼5% -8%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3.1 fps ∼1% -76%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps ∼0% -100%
PCMark for Android
Storage score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4585 Points ∼14% +59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2884 Points ∼9%
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
5432 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5195 Points ∼34% -4%
Work performance score
Google Pixel C
6858 Points ∼34% +22%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼29% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
5608 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
5565 Points ∼28% -1%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5204 Points ∼26% -7%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
4504 Points ∼23% -20%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3898 Points ∼20% -30%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
3536 Points ∼18% -37%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPad (2017)
1213 Points ∼56% +20%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
1185 Points ∼55% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼54% +15%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1086 Points ∼50% +8%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1022 Points ∼47% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1007 Points ∼46%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
973 Points ∼45% -3%
Google Pixel C
884 Points ∼41% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
648 Points ∼30% -36%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
9 Points ∼0% -99%
Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
6485 Points ∼22% +31%
Google Pixel C
6355 Points ∼22% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼21% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4941 Points ∼17%
Apple iPad (2017)
4569 Points ∼16% -8%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
2035 Points ∼7% -59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1385 Points ∼5% -72%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1302 Points ∼5% -74%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1185 Points ∼4% -76%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
729 Points ∼3% -85%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼35% +62%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2212 Points ∼25% +15%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
2185 Points ∼25% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1931 Points ∼22%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1887 Points ∼21% -2%
Apple iPad (2017)
1341 Points ∼15% -31%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
1270 Points ∼14% -34%
Google Pixel C
868 Points ∼10% -55%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
750 Points ∼8% -61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
590 Points ∼7% -69%
System
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
6098 Points ∼37% +74%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼32% +52%
Apple iPad (2017)
4680 Points ∼28% +34%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3581 Points ∼22% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
3505 Points ∼21%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3071 Points ∼19% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
2867 Points ∼17% -18%
Google Pixel C
2724 Points ∼17% -22%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
2047 Points ∼12% -42%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
1250 Points ∼8% -64%
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼39% +37%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
3181 Points ∼38% +32%
Apple iPad (2017)
2441 Points ∼29% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2409 Points ∼29%
Google Pixel C
1909 Points ∼23% -21%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1800 Points ∼21% -25%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1652 Points ∼20% -31%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
1506 Points ∼18% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1103 Points ∼13% -54%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
283 Points ∼3% -88%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6375 Points ∼16% +64%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5277 Points ∼13% +36%
Apple iPad (2017)
4432 Points ∼11% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
3884 Points ∼9%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3324 Points ∼8% -14%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
3118 Points ∼8% -20%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad (2017)
2550 Points ∼39% +53%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1952 Points ∼30% +17%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1726 Points ∼27% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1668 Points ∼26%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1592 Points ∼25% -5%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
1025 Points ∼16% -39%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼11% +60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4187 Points ∼7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼27% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1745 Points ∼24%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1280 Points ∼22% +108%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
1206 Points ∼21% +96%
Apple iPad (2017)
1061 Points ∼19% +73%
Google Pixel C
764 Points ∼13% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
615 Points ∼11%
ANDEBench PRO
3D
Google Pixel C
104.7 fps ∼80% +75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
60 fps ∼46%
Platform
Google Pixel C
268.9 Points ∼4% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
224.2 Points ∼3%
Storage
Google Pixel C
6135 KB/s ∼6% +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4069 KB/s ∼4%
Memory Latency
Google Pixel C
6624 KOps/s ∼82% +63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4056 KOps/s ∼50%
Memory Bandwidth
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
18870 MB/s ∼90%
Google Pixel C
9465 MB/s ∼45% -50%
CoreMark-PRO/HPC (Base)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
5299 Points ∼83%
Google Pixel C
3617 Points ∼56% -32%
Device Score
Google Pixel C
13745 Points ∼53% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
12353 Points ∼47%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
59.7 fps ∼97% +15%
Google Pixel C
56.6 fps ∼92% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
52.1 fps ∼85%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 Apple A9X, Apple A9X / PowerVR Series 7XT, Apple 256 GB (iPad Pro 9.7 NVMe)
 
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP6, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Pixel C Nvidia Tegra X1, NVIDIA Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F Intel Atom x5-Z8550, Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad (2017) Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 128 GB NVMe
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
WebXPRT 2015 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | JetStream 1.1
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
225 Points ∼28% +70%
Apple iPad (2017)
205 Points ∼25% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
154 Points ∼19% +17%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
136 Points ∼17% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
132 Points ∼16%
Google Pixel C
128 Points ∼16% -3%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
115 Points ∼14% -13%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
98 Points ∼12% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
79 Points ∼10% -40%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
56 Points ∼7% -58%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
19621 Points ∼29% +106%
Apple iPad (2017)
18148 Points ∼27% +90%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
14050 Points ∼21% +47%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
11404 Points ∼17% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
9531 Points ∼14%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
8060 Points ∼12% -15%
Google Pixel C
7563 Points ∼11% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
6885 Points ∼10% -28%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3596 Points ∼5% -62%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
2672 Points ∼4% -72%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
14064 ms * ∼24% -527%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
6483.2 ms * ∼11% -189%
Google Pixel C
5533.1 ms * ∼9% -147%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
4419 ms * ∼7% -97%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3001 ms * ∼5% -34%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2822.9 ms * ∼5% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2244.4 ms * ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2236.7 ms * ∼4% -0%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
1546.3 ms * ∼3% +31%
Apple iPad (2017)
1457.7 ms * ∼2% +35%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 9.7
143 Points ∼35% +235%
Apple iPad (2017)
128.6 Points ∼32% +201%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
62.198 Points ∼15% +46%
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
57.4 Points ∼14% +34%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
53.7 Points ∼13% +26%
Google Pixel C
47.4 Points ∼12% +11%
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
44.84 Points ∼11% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
42.73 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
41.12 Points ∼10% -4%
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
18 Points ∼4% -58%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTEHuawei MediaPad T2 10.0 ProGoogle Pixel CHuawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inchAsus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500MLenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90FSamsung Galaxy S8 Plus
AndroBench 3-5
-32%
-52%
-25%
9%
-27%
-34%
80%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.56
13.98
-76%
23.52
-60%
26.9
-54%
30.6
-48%
57.24
-2%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.39
17.57
-77%
61.65
-19%
45.15
-41%
48.9
-36%
71.12
-7%
Random Write 4KB
13.13
9.82
-25%
9.86
-25%
10.08
-23%
31.35
139%
6.8
-48%
11.7
-11%
15.27
16%
Random Read 4KB
45.82
25.56
-44%
14.59
-68%
19.96
-56%
32.04
-30%
24.85
-46%
23.5
-49%
127.18
178%
Sequential Write 256KB
87.6
49.37
-44%
78.2
-11%
109.38
25%
117.15
34%
136.5
56%
80.6
-8%
194.18
122%
Sequential Read 256KB
288.58
248.24
-14%
131.04
-55%
154.29
-47%
249.68
-13%
209.3
-27%
143.4
-50%
787.6
173%
Dead Trigger 2
 BeállításokÉrték
 high30 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 BeállításokÉrték
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Max. terhelés
 31.6 °C34.4 °C28.3 °C 
 29.2 °C28.5 °C27.6 °C 
 27.3 °C28.3 °C29.7 °C 
Maximum: 34.4 °C
Átlag: 29.4 °C
26.8 °C30.2 °C31.1 °C
26.7 °C26.4 °C28.8 °C
26.9 °C26.5 °C26.9 °C
Maximum: 31.1 °C
Átlag: 27.8 °C
Tápegység (max.)  30.6 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.5 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 34.5 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.5 °C / 87 F.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 thermal image under load with a Flir thermal camera
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 thermal image under load with a Flir thermal camera
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.639.82525.430.73125.330.64032.933.55033.632.26331.630.38028.425.91002726.612520.826.81602236.220021.346.325020.861.331521.27240019.475.350019.573.863017.780.880017.980.5100017.879.2125017.373.4160017.474.1200016.772250017.268.5315018.267.7400017.970.7500017.672.8630017.769800017.873.51000017.970.31250018.167.71600018.264.4SPL3086.5N1.371median 17.9median 70.7Delta1.38.339.631.432.735.235.439.635.230.636.927.629.735.227.530.127.224.829.527.527.828.428.227.129.727.834.845.632.435.439.734.831.934.833.53733.931.931.633.628.530.328.531.63437.733.527.828.2344345.529.434.126434650.636.736.520.64650.854.239.840.120.750.855.560.842.342.820.655.561.363.246.147.42161.359.266.746.447.118.459.26368.445.44618.76359.166.447.74817.959.164.770.950.752.918.664.768.173.853.254.817.568.173.178.65860.416.973.175.178.859.259.317.475.169.575.854.455.716.269.569.378.954.559.416.969.371.776.556.656.317.571.770.378.953.858.317.270.369.481.452.960.917.769.472.482.955.862.517.472.469.48253.160.317.669.461.678.345.15617.661.65875.239.851.617.85848.868.73145.717.948.882.490.666.970.529.882.453.28520.625.51.353.2median 63median 73.8median 47.7median 52.9median 17.8median 638.49.37.27.31.68.43730.934.43725.629.328.925.628.931.523.728.929.331.830.929.33935.937.23933.535.130.533.52730.928.52722.432.722.322.423.534.522.923.530.438.92030.434.443.420.434.440.649.719.840.644.255.620.344.247.158.619.247.152.265.917.952.257.172.616.357.15770.417.65758.472.41858.46176.917.66163.779.21763.760.376.717.260.359.275.717.759.256.977.717.356.963.181.917.463.166.688.517.766.664.584.81864.553.975.617.753.947.569.518.247.542.164.217.942.133.357.317.833.373.392.829.873.329.588.31.329.5median 53.9median 70.4median 17.9median 53.99.411.71.39.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825Apple iPad Pro 9.7Google Pixel C
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.51 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPad Pro 9.7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.59 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Google Pixel C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.03 / 0.29 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 2.08 / 3.5 / 3.58 Watt
Terhelés midlight 6.97 / 7.4 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
5870 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 9.7
7306 mAh		Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
6600 mAh		Google Pixel C
 mAh		Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
5900 mAh		Apple iPad (2017)
8.827 mAh
Power Consumption
-31%
-59%
-5%
-32%
-25%
-64%
Idle Minimum *
2.08
2.3
-11%
1.71
18%
1.58
24%
1.82
12%
1.59
24%
2.06
1%
Idle Average *
3.5
4.5
-29%
7.55
-116%
4.12
-18%
4.26
-22%
4.14
-18%
7.42
-112%
Idle Maximum *
3.58
5
-40%
7.62
-113%
4.15
-16%
4.33
-21%
4.23
-18%
7.47
-109%
Load Average *
6.97
9.4
-35%
8.39
-20%
6.2
11%
9.82
-41%
10.89
-56%
9.45
-36%
Load Maximum *
7.4
10.4
-41%
12.08
-63%
9.27
-25%
13.99
-89%
11.58
-56%
12.31
-66%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
31h 43min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 11min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
6h 15min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
5870 mAh		Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
6600 mAh		Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
5900 mAh		Apple iPad (2017)
8.827 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 9.7
7306 mAh
Battery Runtime
-26%
-27%
-22%
-2%
-6%
Reader / Idle
1903
918
-52%
1230
-35%
1453
-24%
1496
-21%
1850
-3%
H.264
551
651
18%
593
8%
600
9%
845
53%
708
28%
WiFi v1.3
760
393
-48%
416
-45%
518
-32%
764
1%
779
3%
Load
375
291
-22%
248
-34%
225
-40%
225
-40%
186
-50%

Pro

+ kiváló minőségű, karcsú ház
+ bővíthető háttértár
+ USB 3.1
+ hosszú üzemidő
+ erős SoC
+ gyors WiFi
+ kiváló HDR-képes kijelző
+ S Pen
+ remek hangszórók
+ jó hívásminőség

Kontra

- csak LTE Cat. 6
- lassú háttértár
- gyenge kamerák
- nincs NFC
- nincs prémium érzete a készüléknek
In review: Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE (SM-T825). Test model courtesy of Samsung Germany.
In review: Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE (SM-T825). Test model courtesy of Samsung Germany.

A Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 LTE nagyon jó tablet, amely nem a legmodernebb hardvert használja mindenre (hasonlóan az Apple iPad 2017-hez), de összességében igen vonzó.

A Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 ugyan nem tesz csodákat, de jelenleg így is a legjobb Android-os tablet.

A kiváló, HDR-képes kijelzőn kívül jó hangszórók, hosszabb üzemidő, S Pen támogatás, valamint igen gyors WiFi modul kapott helyet a gépben. A beépített Snapdragon 820 nem éppen a legújabb Qualcomm lapkakészlet, de a teljesítménye még mindig nagyon jó. Csak a kicsi és lassú eMMC tárhely nem illik egy prémium multimédiás tabletről alkotott képbe. A Samsung kamerákból sem túl jókat épített a gépbe, így végképp nincs prémium érzete.

Az S Pen támogatás viszont kifejezetten tetszett. Alapértelmezettként minden Tab S3 mellé kapunk egyet, és használat közben kiváló benyomást kelt. 770 euró azonban még mindig sok pénz egy tabletért, amelyre nem igazán éri meg váltani, ha már rendelkezünk egy Galaxy Tab S2 9.7-tel, és le tudunk mondani a tollról.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 - 04/26/2017 v6(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Váz
88%
Billentyűzet
77 / 80 → 96%
Érintőpad
94%
Csatlakoztathatóság
51 / 65 → 79%
Súly
84 / 40-88 → 92%
Akkumulátor
93%
Kijelző
90%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
61 / 68 → 90%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
58 / 76 → 77%
Hőmérséklet
94%
Zaj
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 83%
Camera
61 / 85 → 72%
Átlag
79%
91%
Tablet - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 Tablet rövid értékelés
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-05- 4 (Update: 2017-05- 5)
Andreas Osthoff
Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Notebooks