Notebookcheck

HTC U Play Smartphone rövid értékelés

Jó játékos. A HTC U Play egy középkategóriás okostelefon nagyon jó házzal, és pár kiemelkedő tulajdonsággal: ilyen például a Sense Companion nevű személyi asszisztens. Vajon a U Play mindennapi használhatósága is meggyőző?
Florian Wimmer, Stefanie Voigt (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
HTC U Play (U Széria)
Processzor
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memória
3072 MB 
Kijelző
5.20 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, kapacitív érintőkijelző, Super LCD, Gorilla Glass, fényes: igen
Háttértár
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22.8 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: audio kimenet USB-C porton keresztül, Kártyaolvasó: microSD max. 2TB, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: közelségérzékelő, G-mozgásszenzor, iránytű, giroszenzor, mágnesességérzékelő, USB-C, USB OTG, Miracast, DLNA
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40); sávszélesség (le/​fel): 300Mbps/​50Mbps (LTE), LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 8 x 146 x 72.9
Akkumulátor
9.5 Wh, 2500 mAh Lítium-Ion, Beszédidő 3G (gyártói adat): 15 h, Készenlét 3G (gyártói adat): 420 h
Operációs rendszer
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix BSI szenzor, optikai képstabilizáció (OIS), ƒ/2.0, dual-LED vaku
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix UltraPixel mód, BSI szenzor
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: hangszóró az alsó peremen, Billentyűzet: virtuális, HTC U Sonic headset, töltő, USB-C kábel, törlőkendő, áttetsző tok, HTC Sense Companion, Zoe, Help, 24 Hónap Garancia, SAR: 0.4W/​kg (fej), 0.48W/​kg (test), gyorstöltő funkció
Súly
145 g, Tápegység: 60 g
Ár
449 Euró
Hivatkozások
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

152.6 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 155 g152.7 mm 74.7 mm 7.35 mm 158 g151.8 mm 75.7 mm 7.3 mm 162 g146 mm 72.9 mm 8 mm 145 g145.5 mm 71 mm 7.45 mm 153 g143 mm 69 mm 7.7 mm 152 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
HTC U Play
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
249 MBit/s ∼97%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.4 MBit/s ∼21% -79%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32.9 MBit/s ∼13% -87%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s ∼100% +20%
HTC U Play
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
260 MBit/s ∼83%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.5 MBit/s ∼16% -80%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31.2 MBit/s ∼10% -88%
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: woods
GPS Garmin Edge 500: woods
GPS Garmin Edge 500: bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500: bridge
GPS HTC U Play: overview
GPS HTC U Play: overview
GPS HTC U Play: woods
GPS HTC U Play: woods
GPS HTC U Play: bridge
GPS HTC U Play: bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
419
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
424
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 451 cd/m² Átlag: 432.1 cd/m² Minimum: 5.9 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 90 %
Centrumban: 424 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1696:1 (Fekete: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.32
HTC U Play
Super LCD, 1920x1080, 5.20
OnePlus 3T
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Sony Xperia X
LCD, 1920x1080, 5.00
Huawei Nova Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Honor 8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
Screen
-24%
-14%
-54%
-10%
-16%
Brightness middle
424
421
-1%
658
55%
404
-5%
485
14%
451
6%
Brightness
432
430
0%
633
47%
392
-9%
481
11%
443
3%
Brightness Distribution
90
84
-7%
93
3%
91
1%
90
0%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.25
0.66
-164%
0.68
-172%
0.5
-100%
0.4
-60%
Contrast
1696
997
-41%
594
-65%
970
-43%
1128
-33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.7
7.1
-25%
4.9
14%
7.1
-25%
4.2
26%
5.4
5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.8
15.3
-42%
9.1
16%
13.2
-22%
7.9
27%
9.9
8%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.1
6.8
-66%
5.8
-41%
9.7
-137%
4.8
-17%
6.7
-63%
Gamma
2.32 95%
2.23 99%
2.26 97%
2.23 99%
2.36 93%
2.33 94%
CCT
7359 88%
7866 83%
7840 83%
9502 68%
7568 86%
8262 79%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9714 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC U Play
51628 Points ∼18%
OnePlus 3T
159866 Points ∼54% +210%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
62484 Points ∼21% +21%
Sony Xperia X
77650 Points ∼26% +50%
Huawei Nova Plus
64601 Points ∼22% +25%
Honor 8
94671 Points ∼32% +83%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC U Play
2825 Points ∼7%
OnePlus 3T
4236 Points ∼10% +50%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4042 Points ∼10% +43%
Huawei Nova Plus
3156 Points ∼8% +12%
Honor 8
5481 Points ∼13% +94%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC U Play
775 Points ∼12%
OnePlus 3T
1881 Points ∼29% +143%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
820 Points ∼13% +6%
Huawei Nova Plus
845 Points ∼13% +9%
Honor 8
1726 Points ∼27% +123%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
HTC U Play
1498 Points ∼28%
OnePlus 3T
1728 Points ∼32% +15%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2109 Points ∼40% +41%
Sony Xperia X
1504 Points ∼28% 0%
Huawei Nova Plus
1773 Points ∼33% +18%
Honor 8
2482 Points ∼47% +66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U Play
349 Points ∼3%
OnePlus 3T
2418 Points ∼21% +593%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
380 Points ∼3% +9%
Sony Xperia X
761 Points ∼7% +118%
Huawei Nova Plus
384 Points ∼3% +10%
Honor 8
818 Points ∼7% +134%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
HTC U Play
421 Points ∼2%
OnePlus 3T
2221 Points ∼11% +428%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
465 Points ∼2% +10%
Sony Xperia X
855 Points ∼4% +103%
Huawei Nova Plus
465 Points ∼2% +10%
Honor 8
961 Points ∼5% +128%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
HTC U Play
1516 Points ∼29%
OnePlus 3T
1452 Points ∼27% -4%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points ∼40% +39%
Sony Xperia X
1441 Points ∼27% -5%
Huawei Nova Plus
1795 Points ∼34% +18%
Honor 8
2587 Points ∼49% +71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U Play
565 Points ∼3%
OnePlus 3T
3310 Points ∼20% +486%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points ∼4% +27%
Sony Xperia X
1280 Points ∼8% +127%
Huawei Nova Plus
733 Points ∼4% +30%
Honor 8
1112 Points ∼7% +97%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
HTC U Play
657 Points ∼6%
OnePlus 3T
2577 Points ∼23% +292%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points ∼7% +28%
Sony Xperia X
1313 Points ∼12% +100%
Huawei Nova Plus
844 Points ∼7% +28%
Honor 8
1273 Points ∼11% +94%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC U Play
9970 Points ∼10%
OnePlus 3T
22426 Points ∼23% +125%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points ∼17% +60%
Sony Xperia X
10801 Points ∼11% +8%
Huawei Nova Plus
15823 Points ∼16% +59%
Honor 8
15531 Points ∼16% +56%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
HTC U Play
11713 Points ∼2%
OnePlus 3T
34494 Points ∼5% +194%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points ∼2% +15%
Sony Xperia X
21087 Points ∼3% +80%
Huawei Nova Plus
13412 Points ∼2% +15%
Honor 8
22157 Points ∼3% +89%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC U Play
11275 Points ∼4%
OnePlus 3T
30810 Points ∼11% +173%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points ∼5% +24%
Sony Xperia X
17404 Points ∼6% +54%
Huawei Nova Plus
13882 Points ∼5% +23%
Honor 8
20235 Points ∼7% +79%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HTC U Play
18 fps ∼0%
OnePlus 3T
91 fps ∼1% +406%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps ∼0% +28%
Sony Xperia X
30 fps ∼0% +67%
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps ∼0% +28%
Honor 8
41 fps ∼0% +128%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HTC U Play
18 fps ∼1%
OnePlus 3T
59 fps ∼2% +228%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps ∼1% +17%
Sony Xperia X
33 fps ∼1% +83%
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps ∼1% +28%
Honor 8
43 fps ∼1% +139%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC U Play
7.1 fps ∼1%
OnePlus 3T
46 fps ∼5% +548%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps ∼1% +39%
Sony Xperia X
9.2 fps ∼1% +30%
Huawei Nova Plus
9.9 fps ∼1% +39%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼2% +168%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC U Play
7 fps ∼2%
OnePlus 3T
45 fps ∼12% +543%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps ∼3% +39%
Sony Xperia X
15 fps ∼4% +114%
Huawei Nova Plus
10 fps ∼3% +43%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼5% +171%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC U Play
4.8 fps ∼0%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼1% +567%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 fps ∼0% +29%
Sony Xperia X
4.6 fps ∼0% -4%
Huawei Nova Plus
6.2 fps ∼0% +29%
Honor 8
10 fps ∼0% +108%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC U Play
4.8 fps ∼0%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼1% +567%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 fps ∼0% +27%
Sony Xperia X
10 fps ∼0% +108%
Huawei Nova Plus
6.6 fps ∼0% +38%
Honor 8
11 fps ∼0% +129%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
HTC U Play
3356 Points ∼17%
OnePlus 3T
5664 Points ∼28% +69%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points ∼34% +102%
Sony Xperia X
4379 Points ∼22% +30%
Huawei Nova Plus
5724 Points ∼29% +71%
Honor 8
6735 Points ∼34% +101%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
HTC U Play
10 Points ∼0%
OnePlus 3T
891 Points ∼41% +8810%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points ∼32% +6920%
Sony Xperia X
774 Points ∼36% +7640%
Huawei Nova Plus
754 Points ∼35% +7440%
Honor 8
994 Points ∼46% +9840%
Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U Play
666 Points ∼2%
OnePlus 3T
4444 Points ∼15% +567%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points ∼4% +53%
Sony Xperia X
1581 Points ∼5% +137%
Huawei Nova Plus
1015 Points ∼4% +52%
Honor 8
1703 Points ∼6% +156%
Memory (sort by value)
HTC U Play
996 Points ∼11%
OnePlus 3T
1954 Points ∼22% +96%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points ∼12% +5%
Sony Xperia X
1408 Points ∼16% +41%
Huawei Nova Plus
1553 Points ∼18% +56%
Honor 8
2556 Points ∼29% +157%
System (sort by value)
HTC U Play
2173 Points ∼13%
OnePlus 3T
3130 Points ∼19% +44%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points ∼18% +35%
Sony Xperia X
2564 Points ∼16% +18%
Huawei Nova Plus
2132 Points ∼13% -2%
Honor 8
3952 Points ∼24% +82%
Overall (sort by value)
HTC U Play
344 Points ∼4%
OnePlus 3T
2218 Points ∼26% +545%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points ∼14% +253%
Sony Xperia X
1450 Points ∼17% +322%
Huawei Nova Plus
1262 Points ∼15% +267%
Honor 8
2034 Points ∼24% +491%

Legend

 
HTC U Play Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia X Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Nova Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC U Play
3163 Points ∼5%
OnePlus 3T
9798 Points ∼15% +210%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4905 Points ∼7% +55%
Sony Xperia X
8388 Points ∼13% +165%
Huawei Nova Plus
4730 Points ∼7% +50%
Honor 8
10692 Points ∼16% +238%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC U Play
9981.6 ms * ∼17%
OnePlus 3T
2719.3 ms * ∼5% +73%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
8041.4 ms * ∼14% +19%
Sony Xperia X
3677 ms * ∼6% +63%
Huawei Nova Plus
8027.7 ms * ∼13% +20%
Honor 8
2979 ms * ∼5% +70%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC U Play
22.318 Points ∼6%
OnePlus 3T
54.526 Points ∼14% +144%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
31.118 Points ∼8% +39%
Sony Xperia X
50.92 Points ∼13% +128%
Huawei Nova Plus
31.3 Points ∼8% +40%
Honor 8
64.046 Points ∼16% +187%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC U Play
23.6 MB/s ∼27%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
50.07 MB/s ∼57% +112%
Sony Xperia X
12.82 MB/s ∼15% -46%
Huawei Nova Plus
33.32 MB/s ∼38% +41%
Honor 8
23.59 MB/s ∼27% 0%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC U Play
36.8 MB/s ∼38%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
79.22 MB/s ∼82% +115%
Sony Xperia X
17.67 MB/s ∼18% -52%
Huawei Nova Plus
41.64 MB/s ∼43% +13%
Honor 8
53.68 MB/s ∼56% +46%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
HTC U Play
52.7 MB/s ∼17%
OnePlus 3T
74.39 MB/s ∼23% +41%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
7.4 MB/s ∼2% -86%
Sony Xperia X
10.26 MB/s ∼3% -81%
Huawei Nova Plus
30.12 MB/s ∼9% -43%
Honor 8
31.5 MB/s ∼10% -40%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
HTC U Play
32 MB/s ∼9%
OnePlus 3T
123.57 MB/s ∼34% +286%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
74 MB/s ∼20% +131%
Sony Xperia X
36.28 MB/s ∼10% +13%
Huawei Nova Plus
35.64 MB/s ∼10% +11%
Honor 8
34.16 MB/s ∼9% +7%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
HTC U Play
135.5 MB/s ∼10%
OnePlus 3T
165.3 MB/s ∼13% +22%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
188 MB/s ∼14% +39%
Sony Xperia X
117.38 MB/s ∼9% -13%
Huawei Nova Plus
82.13 MB/s ∼6% -39%
Honor 8
119.25 MB/s ∼9% -12%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
HTC U Play
197.3 MB/s ∼10%
OnePlus 3T
436.43 MB/s ∼21% +121%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
282 MB/s ∼14% +43%
Sony Xperia X
184.33 MB/s ∼9% -7%
Huawei Nova Plus
241.57 MB/s ∼12% +22%
Honor 8
247.46 MB/s ∼12% +25%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 BeállításokÉrték
 high29 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 BeállításokÉrték
 high48 fps
Max. terhelés
 34.3 °C32.4 °C32.8 °C 
 35 °C32.7 °C35.9 °C 
 34.2 °C32.6 °C33.4 °C 
Maximum: 35.9 °C
Átlag: 33.7 °C
29.3 °C31.8 °C34.8 °C
30.3 °C32.7 °C34.7 °C
30.9 °C32.5 °C34.4 °C
Maximum: 34.8 °C
Átlag: 32.4 °C
Tápegység (max.)  33.2 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.229.330.22526.829.126.83126.727.826.74027.932.627.95027.726.727.76323.528.823.58024.324.924.310027.124.727.11253222.13216034.820.834.820040.820.140.825046.219.846.231551.42151.440055.921.755.95006020.56063063.22163.280065.218.465.2100069.11769.1125072.617.372.6160077.115.277.1200078.715.578.7250077.11577.1315080.814.980.8400080.515.180.5500076.814.676.8630070.414.670.480006214.6621000063.914.663.91250051.714.651.71600041.414.641.4SPL88.228.888.2N64.41.264.4median 63.2median 17median 63.2Delta13.8313.826.128.726.12625.22625.42725.425.829.325.825.226.125.223.123.823.133.430.833.436.13336.135.428.935.434.724.734.743.324.943.349.71949.753.319.153.356.520.456.559.318.159.363.617.563.664.71764.768.815.968.869.114.569.170.713.770.772.614.372.675.813.475.874.213.674.275.513.375.574.312.974.371.812.771.871.81371.872.212.772.266.61366.65512.75584.427.584.456.9156.9median 66.6median 14.5median 66.69.83.69.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHTC U PlayOnePlus 3T
HTC U Play audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

OnePlus 3T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.11 / 0.24 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.92 / 1.84 / 2 Watt
Terhelés midlight 4.3 / 6.2 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HTC U Play
2500 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia X
2620 mAh
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-17%
4%
1%
24%
0%
Idle Minimum *
0.92
0.61
34%
0.83
10%
0.56
39%
0.49
47%
0.78
15%
Idle Average *
1.84
1.77
4%
2.11
-15%
1.69
8%
1.63
11%
1.89
-3%
Idle Maximum *
2
1.81
9%
2.12
-6%
1.75
12%
1.76
12%
2.02
-1%
Load Average *
4.3
6.67
-55%
3.41
21%
6.01
-40%
2.98
31%
5.28
-23%
Load Maximum *
6.2
10.98
-77%
5.46
12%
7.03
-13%
4.99
20%
5.44
12%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
21h 42min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 34min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
3h 43min
HTC U Play
2500 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia X
2620 mAh
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
24%
54%
-4%
59%
9%
Reader / Idle
1302
1423
9%
1502
15%
1240
-5%
2048
57%
1487
14%
H.264
514
810
58%
905
76%
518
1%
732
42%
526
2%
WiFi v1.3
473
494
4%
797
68%
434
-8%
820
73%
499
5%
Load
223
282
26%
352
58%
213
-4%
366
64%
255
14%

Pro

+ stílusos és stabil ház
+ kevés felesleges szoftver
+ sok tartozék
+ előretelepített személyi asszisztens
+ sok LTE sáv
+ gyors Wi-Fi
+ NFC és USB-OTG
+ gyorstöltő funkció

Kontra

- nincs 3.5 mm-es jack
- közepes teljesítmény
- ujjlenyomatmágnes
- a pixelek láthatók UltraPixel módban
- a kamera néha elmosódott képeket csinál
- közepes hangszóró
- tompított mikrofon
In review: HTC U Play. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: HTC U Play. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

A HTC U Play jól néz ki, személyi asszisztenssel, két nagy felbontású kamerával, és bőséges mennyiségű extra tartozékkal érkezik. Miért esik mégis nehezünkre feltétel nélkül ajánlani ezt a telefont a nagyon kompetitív felső-középkategóriás szegmensben? Sajnos a HTC telefonja sok dologban nem képes versenyre kelni a sokat tudó vetélytársakkal. Bár a kamerák felbontása nagy, mindkettőnek gondjai akadnak az élességgel, valamint az UltraPixel módban a pixeles szegélyekkel. A személyi asszisztens jól jön, de a Google Play Store-ban sok hasonló képességű appot találhatunk. Az adaptív headset remek és innovatív, de a 3.5 mm-es jack csatlakozó eltűnéséhez vezetett, amely pedig sokaknak fontos lenne.

Sajnos a hangszóró minősége messze a HTC-től megszokott alatt marad, és a mikrofon hangminősége is csak középszerű. Azért sem könnyű ajánlani a HTC U Play-t, mivel a hasonlóan árazott készülékeknél is alacsonyabb teljesítményt nyújt. A telep üzemideje is elmarad a kategória átlagától, ami szintén probléma.

A HTC egy stílusos, viszonylag jól összerakott telefont épített, amelybe jó előlapi kamerát és minimális mennyiségű szoftvert pakolt, emellé jó kijelzőt és egy sor extrát is kaptunk. Sajnos más dolgok, mint például a hangminőség, a teljesítmény és az üzemidő elmaradnak az elvárttól.

Végül is a HTC U Play elég jó középkategóriás okostelefon, de a versenytársak mostanság többet kínálnak. Azok, akik számára a high-tech telefon, egy személyi asszisztenssel és nagy felbontású előlapi kamerával meggyőzően hangzik, egy stílusos okostelefon tulajdonosai lesznek. Ugyanakkor a középszerű üzemidővel és teljesítménnyel is meg kell tanulniuk együtt élni.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

HTC U Play - 03/28/2017 v6(old)
Florian Wimmer

Váz
89%
Billentyűzet
63 / 75 → 84%
Érintőpad
89%
Csatlakoztathatóság
46 / 60 → 77%
Súly
93%
Akkumulátor
90%
Kijelző
85%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
22 / 63 → 34%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
37 / 70 → 53%
Hőmérséklet
92%
Zaj
100%
Audio
52 / 91 → 57%
Camera
74%
Átlag
72%
83%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > HTC U Play Smartphone rövid értékelés
Florian Wimmer, 2017-04-11 (Update: 2017-04-11)