Notebookcheck

Acer Predator Helios 500 (GTX 1070, i7-8750H) Laptop rövid értékelés

Sebastian Jentsch, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Tanja Hinum (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 06/08/2018
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Gamer fejlesztés. Exkluzív értékelésünk az Acer masszív gépéről. Egy 45 wattos CPU-val és egy GTX 1070-nel felszerelve, a vadiúj házban igazi gamer erőgép lakik. A Helios 500 a Helios 300 utódja, és ugyan még mindig elég nagy és nehéz, immáron nem olyan éles szegélyű.

Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY (Predator Helios Széria)
Processzor
Intel Core i7-8750H
Grafikus adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Mag: 1480 MHz, Memória: 2002 MHz, GDDR5, Boost 1695, 397.64
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4, 2 x 8 GB, max. 32 GB DDR4 RAM, 2 hely szabad
Kijelző
17.3 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO_B173HAN03, IPS, 144 Hz G-Sync, fényes: nem
Alaplap
Intel HM370
Háttértár
SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A, 256 GB 
, + Western Digital Blue Mobile 1TB, 7mm, 128MB, SATA 6Gb/s (WD10SPZX), 1100 GB ingyenes
Hangkártya
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Csatlakozók
3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington zár, Audió csatlakozók: line-out / mikrofon
Hálózat
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 38.7 x 428 x 298
Akkumulátor
72 Wh, 4660 mAh Lítium-Polimer, removeable, AP17C5P, Akkumulátor üzemidő (gyártói adat): 3 h
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webkamera: 720p 1280x720
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: sztereo + mélysugárzó, Billentyűzet: chiclet, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, 230 wattos hálózati adapter, Predator Sense, Norton Security próbaverzió, 24 Hónap Garancia
Súly
3.778 kg, Tápegység: 1.115 kg
Hivatkozások
Acer honlap
Acer noteszgépek
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Acer Predator Helios 500
Acer Predator Helios 500
Acer Predator Helios 500
Acer Predator Helios 500
Acer Predator Helios 500
Acer Predator Helios 500
Acer Predator Helios 500
Acer Predator Helios 500
Acer Predator Helios 500
Acer Predator Helios 500
Acer Predator Helios 500
Acer Predator Helios 500

» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép 
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja

Size Comparison

Audio-in / line-out, 2x USB 3.1 Gen1, Kensington lock
Audio-in / line-out, 2x USB 3.1 Gen1, Kensington lock
Ethernet (Killer) USB 3.0 + Charge, 2x Type-C Thunderbolt with USB 3.1 Gen2 and DisplayPort
Ethernet (Killer) USB 3.0 + Charge, 2x Type-C Thunderbolt with USB 3.1 Gen2 and DisplayPort
Power, DisplayPort, HDMI
Power, DisplayPort, HDMI
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Helios 300
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
696 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
694 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
686 MBit/s ∼99% +2%
Asus G703
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
681 MBit/s ∼98% +1%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
671 MBit/s ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=175)
595 MBit/s ∼85% -11%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
593 MBit/s ∼85% -12%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
424 MBit/s ∼61% -37%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
691 MBit/s ∼100%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
624 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
604 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
589 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
545 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=175)
533 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Asus G703
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
506 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
295
cd/m²		316
cd/m²		304
cd/m²
295
cd/m²		335
cd/m²		312
cd/m²
276
cd/m²		276
cd/m²		288
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 335 cd/m² Átlag: 299.7 cd/m² Minimum: 20.2 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 82 %
Centrumban: 340 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 479:1 (Fekete: 0.7 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.99 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 1.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
AUO_B173HAN03, , 1920x1080, 17.3		Asus G703
AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), , 1920x1080, 17.3		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), , 1920x1080, 17.3		HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
AU Optronics B173HW01, , 1920x1080, 17.3		Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
ID: AUO169D, Name: AU Optronics B173HAN01.6, , 1920x1080, 17.3		Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), , 3840x2160, 17.3
Response Times
-25%
41%
-233%
-238%
-221%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14 (7, 7)
17.6 (8.4, 9.2)
-26%
8 (4.4, 3.6)
43%
44 (22, 22)
-214%
36.8 (19.6, 17.2)
-163%
50 (24.4, 25.6)
-257%
Response Time Black / White *
9 (5, 4)
11.2 (6, 5.2)
-24%
5.6 (3.8, 1.8)
38%
31.6 (16, 15.6)
-251%
37.2 (21.6, 15.6)
-313%
25.6 (11.2, 14.4)
-184%
PWM Frequency
26000 (19)
Screen
18%
35%
24%
27%
34%
Brightness middle
335
274
-18%
240
-28%
343
2%
367.4
10%
343
2%
Brightness
300
268
-11%
248
-17%
332
11%
363
21%
328
9%
Brightness Distribution
82
80
-2%
83
1%
83
1%
86
5%
84
2%
Black Level *
0.7
0.29
59%
0.22
69%
0.35
50%
0.32
54%
0.29
59%
Contrast
479
945
97%
1091
128%
980
105%
1148
140%
1183
147%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.99
3.99
20%
2.14
57%
3.35
33%
3.8
24%
4.01
20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.32
7.33
21%
5.04
46%
5.62
40%
10.4
-12%
6.03
35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.93
1.79
7%
1.54
20%
2.5
-30%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.2
4.14
20%
1.62
69%
2.4
54%
3.5
33%
4.7
10%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.58 85%
2.28 96%
2.35 94%
2.18 101%
2.4 92%
CCT
7719 84%
7352 88%
6846 95%
6495 100%
6467 101%
6451 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
60
2%
77
31%
57
-3%
58.1
-2%
88
49%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
92
1%
100
10%
88
-3%
89.3
-2%
100
10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-4% / 11%
38% / 36%
-105% / -16%
-106% / -17%
-94% / -8%

* ... smaller is better

Calman Color Checker - pre-calibration
Calman Color Checker - pre-calibration
Calman Color Checker - post calibration
Calman Color Checker - post calibration
Calman grayscale - pre-calibration
Calman grayscale - pre-calibration
Calman grayscale - post calibration
Calman grayscale - post calibration
Calman saturation - pre-calibration
Calman saturation - pre-calibration
Calman saturation - post calibration
Calman saturation - post calibration

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8773 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z Cache
CPU-Z Cache
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z SPD
CPU-Z SPD
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWinfo
HWinfo
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
205 Points ∼100% +18%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
185 Points ∼90% +7%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
Intel Core i7-8750H
173 Points ∼84%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=47)
173 Points ∼84% 0%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
162 Points ∼79% -6%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼78% -8%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
157 Points ∼77% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 209, n=413)
151 Points ∼74% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1378 Points ∼100% +37%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=50)
1103 Points ∼80% +10%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
Intel Core i7-8750H
1007 Points ∼73%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
932 Points ∼68% -7%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
770 Points ∼56% -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1865, n=414)
744 Points ∼54% -26%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼53% -27%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points ∼53% -27%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
173 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1007 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
125.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Segítség
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
6016 Points ∼100% +2%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A
5872 Points ∼98%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5801 Points ∼96% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (5210 - 5968, n=6)
5621 Points ∼93% -4%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5450 Points ∼91% -7%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
5159 Points ∼86% -12%
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
5116 Points ∼85% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=310)
4919 Points ∼82% -16%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4541 Points ∼75% -23%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
5944 Points ∼100% +9%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5720 Points ∼96% +5%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A
5431 Points ∼91%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5221 Points ∼88% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (4271 - 5557, n=6)
4962 Points ∼83% -9%
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
4874 Points ∼82% -10%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4395 Points ∼74% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=328)
4218 Points ∼71% -22%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
4207 Points ∼71% -23%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5431 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5872 pontok
Segítség
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A		Asus G703
2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)		HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP		Average SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
157%
96%
67%
17%
0%
Write 4K
79.18
160.7
103%
111.8
41%
148.8
88%
155.1
96%
79.2
0%
Read 4K
39.69
54.82
38%
42.09
6%
46.64
18%
44.22
11%
39.7
0%
Write Seq
949.6
2738
188%
2288
141%
1216
28%
311.2
-67%
950
0%
Read Seq
1087
3346
208%
3321
206%
1461
34%
1247
15%
1087
0%
Write 4K Q32T1
189.6
612.4
223%
308.3
63%
444
134%
310.3
64%
190
0%
Read 4K Q32T1
304
708.7
133%
364.9
20%
535
76%
551.2
81%
304
0%
Write Seq Q32T1
947.7
3082
225%
2440
157%
1210
28%
311.5
-67%
948
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
1488
3505
136%
3485
134%
3450
132%
1560
5%
1488
0%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1488 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 947.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 304 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 189.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1087 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 949.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 39.69 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 79.18 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G703
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK
22160 Points ∼100% +26%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-8950HK
21422 Points ∼97% +21%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK
20307 Points ∼92% +15%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
17649 Points ∼80%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (15718 - 19059, n=56)
17228 Points ∼78% -2%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
16847 Points ∼76% -5%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
11049 Points ∼50% -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=441)
10260 Points ∼46% -42%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus G703
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK
143992 Points ∼100%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-8950HK
140768 Points ∼98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (64973 - 125922, n=51)
99208 Points ∼69%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
94246 Points ∼65%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK
88432 Points ∼61%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
77354 Points ∼54%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=432)
62056 Points ∼43%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15019 pontok
3DMark Time Spy Score
5741 pontok
Segítség
Dirt Rally | The Witcher 3 | Fallout 4 | Rise of the Tomb Raider | Resident Evil 7 | Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) | F1 2017 | Call of Duty WWII | Star Wars Battlefront 2 | Kingdom Come: Deliverance
Dirt Rally - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A
119 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (84.7 - 119, n=3)
102 fps ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.7 - 168, n=29)
76.2 fps ∼64% -36%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
77.9 fps ∼100% +37%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
76.8 fps ∼99% +35%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
65 fps ∼83% +14%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
59.4 fps ∼76% +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (48.2 - 68.4, n=41)
59.1 fps ∼76% +4%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A
57 fps ∼73%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=217)
44.8 fps ∼58% -21%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
38.3 fps ∼49% -33%
Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
136 fps ∼100% +11%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A
122 fps ∼90%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (95.4 - 122, n=9)
105 fps ∼77% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.8 - 168, n=80)
71 fps ∼52% -42%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
66.8 fps ∼49% -45%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
109 fps ∼100% +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (79.1 - 103, n=25)
92.3 fps ∼85% +3%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A
90 fps ∼83%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.9 - 126, n=141)
62.4 fps ∼57% -31%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
58.7 fps ∼54% -35%
Resident Evil 7 - 1920x1080 Very High / On AA:FXAA+T
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
163 fps ∼100% +11%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A
147 fps ∼90%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (130 - 162, n=6)
139 fps ∼85% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.8 - 234, n=27)
113 fps ∼69% -23%
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A
95 fps ∼100%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
92 fps ∼97% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (70 - 95, n=5)
81.2 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.2 - 95, n=21)
70.5 fps ∼74% -26%
F1 2017 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
108 (min: 82, max: 118) fps ∼100% +11%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A
97 fps ∼90%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (88 - 102, n=5)
94.8 fps ∼88% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (20 - 115, n=27)
77.4 fps ∼72% -20%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
61 fps ∼56% -37%
Call of Duty WWII - 1920x1080 Extra / On AA:Filmic T2X SM
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
136 fps ∼100% +43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (95 - 122, n=6)
110 fps ∼81% +16%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A
95 fps ∼70%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 149, n=21)
88.3 fps ∼65% -7%
Star Wars Battlefront 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
124 fps ∼100% +35%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
121 fps ∼98% +32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (90.7 - 104, n=5)
97.4 fps ∼79% +6%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A
92 fps ∼74%
Average of class Gaming
  (10.1 - 124, n=20)
76.2 fps ∼61% -17%
Kingdom Come: Deliverance - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A
82 fps ∼100%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
76.4 fps ∼93% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (54.2 - 82, n=5)
65.5 fps ∼80% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (7.5 - 82, n=21)
49.2 fps ∼60% -40%
01020304050607080Tooltip
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A; The Witcher 3: Ø58.5 (36-65)
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP; The Witcher 3: Ø65.3 (58-71)
Asus G703 GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø71.8 (67-75)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø72.3 (68-76)
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP; The Witcher 3: Ø36.1 (32-40)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7; The Witcher 3: Ø57.6 (54-61)
alacsony közepes magas ultra
Dirt Rally (2015) 119fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 11057fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 133122fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 10890fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 127118fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 163147fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 13195fps
F1 2017 (2017) 14097fps
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 13095fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 11392fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 5982fps

Zajszint

Üresjárat
31.2 / 35.3 / 35.3 dB(A)
HDD
31 dB(A)
Terhelés
44.4 / 45.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
csendes
40 dB(A)
hallható
50 dB(A)
hangos
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról)   environment noise: 30.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.339.736.336.437.437.32535.136.234.333.635.335.13134.233.232313134.2403233.432.73229.5325032.332.630.931.331.132.36332.633.131.93335.932.68030.730.829.930.629.330.710035.538.430.831.227.835.512527.930.426.628.625.127.916029.631.126.92625.829.62003031.426.726.326.73025032.133.326.824.42332.131533.934.827.123.723.933.940032.233.425.922.22132.250030.631.624.42221.230.66303131.92421.220.43180032.633.224.420.719.432.6100034.735.226.219.518.334.7125035.836.22718.817.935.8160034.835.826.218.317.134.8200034.835.524.917.917.334.8250033.834.322.417.71733.8315032.233.520.517.616.932.2400029.430.619.317.616.929.4500027.929.318.617.616.727.9630025.126.717.917.516.825.1800022.523.817.617.616.822.51000020.82217.617.616.720.81250019.22017.617.616.919.21600018.819.61817.81718.8SPL44.445.235.631.230.444.4N4.54.82.11.41.34.5median 31median 31.9median 24.4median 18.8median 17.9median 31Delta3.83.33.73.43.13.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
Max. terhelés
 38.7 °C42.6 °C33.4 °C 
 35.1 °C39 °C33.2 °C 
 28.2 °C27 °C28.3 °C 
Maximum: 42.6 °C
Átlag: 33.9 °C
37.2 °C34.2 °C35 °C
30.9 °C30.1 °C29.4 °C
27 °C27 °C26.9 °C
Maximum: 37.2 °C
Átlag: 30.8 °C
Tápegység (max.)  44.9 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 23.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 41.6 °C / 107 F, ranging from 21.1 to 78 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-2.3 °C / -4.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.637.441.6254135.3413141.13141.14041.629.541.65042.631.142.66344.535.944.58045.829.345.810049.727.849.712550.725.150.716052.625.852.620055.726.755.725059.42359.431565.223.965.240062.72162.750061.121.261.163063.820.463.880061.319.461.3100061.518.361.512506117.961160066.317.166.3200063.917.363.9250060.31760.3315057.616.957.6400060.416.960.4500060.416.760.4630066.816.866.8800063.216.863.21000058.916.758.91250054.116.954.11600052.51752.5SPL74.730.474.7N351.335median 60.4median 17.9median 60.4Delta3.23.13.235.737.233.530.933.831.532.331.631.632.832.530.529.33029.530.327.63427.441.526.545.425.748.525.851.224.951.324.551.724.760.825.164.42463.923.76024.259.923.660.423.362.323.459.923.464.623.66123.559.523.265.723.261.523.258.52453.23673.82.633.2median 24median 59.91.5640.343.634.840.732.934.433.943.328.639.830.14428.554.427.963.325.560.223.466.623.672.124.273.823.574.322.37721.278.420.675.819.677.520.37818.975.618.673.418.971.618.678.518.377.518.270.418.369.818.270.418.166.218.362.918.460.817.955.231.4871.676.3median 18.9median 72.12.64.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BYHP Omen X 17-ap0xxAcer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP Omen X 17-ap0xx audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.28 / 0.82 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 20.4 / 26.5 / 37 Watt
Terhelés midlight 129 / 216 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3		Acer Predator Helios 300
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 17.3		Asus G703
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3		HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3		Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3		Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3		Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
43%
-22%
-37%
6%
42%
-3%
4%
12%
Idle Minimum *
20.4
7
66%
26
-27%
31
-52%
21.6
-6%
10.6
48%
23
-13%
21 (9 - 31, n=54)
-3%
20.2 (3.9 - 113, n=603)
1%
Idle Average *
26.5
13
51%
30
-13%
35
-32%
26.4
-0%
16
40%
33
-25%
26.4 (14 - 38.6, n=54)
-0%
25.8 (6.8 - 119, n=603)
3%
Idle Maximum *
37
20
46%
37
-0%
45
-22%
26.6
28%
16.4
56%
40
-8%
31.8 (19 - 49.2, n=54)
14%
30.9 (8.3 - 122, n=603)
16%
Load Average *
129
81
37%
123
5%
130
-1%
95.6
26%
75.9
41%
94
27%
118 (82 - 234, n=54)
9%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=594)
19%
Load Maximum *
216
162
25%
341
-58%
374
-73%
199.6
8%
163.8
24%
228
-6%
219 (170 - 309, n=54)
-1%
166 (21.9 - 590, n=593)
23%
Witcher 3 ultra *
186
127
32%
257
-38%
268
-44%
221.7
-19%
111.2
40%
177
5%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
 FelbontásBeállításokÉrték
 1920x1080Witcher 3 ultra 150cd66 min
 WiFi Websurfing 1.3174 min
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!