Acer Predator Helios 500 (GTX 1070, i7-8750H) Laptop rövid értékelés

Sebastian Jentsch (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 06/08/2018

Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Gamer fejlesztés. Exkluzív értékelésünk az Acer masszív gépéről. Egy 45 wattos CPU-val és egy GTX 1070-nel felszerelve, a vadiúj házban igazi gamer erőgép lakik. A Helios 500 a Helios 300 utódja, és ugyan még mindig elég nagy és nehéz, immáron nem olyan éles szegélyű.

Test device courtesy of Acer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Size Comparison

MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan Asus G703 Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ HP Omen X 17-ap0xx Acer Predator Helios 300 Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220

Audio-in / line-out, 2x USB 3.1 Gen1, Kensington lock

Ethernet (Killer) USB 3.0 + Charge, 2x Type-C Thunderbolt with USB 3.1 Gen2 and DisplayPort

» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Helios 300 Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4	696 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	694 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	686 MBit/s ∼99% +2%
Asus G703 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	681 MBit/s ∼98% +1%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	671 MBit/s ∼96%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	593 MBit/s ∼85% -12%
Average of class Gaming (141 - 702, n=162)	591 MBit/s ∼85% -12%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	424 MBit/s ∼61% -37%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	691 MBit/s ∼100%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	681 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	624 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	604 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	589 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4	545 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
Average of class Gaming (213 - 697, n=162)	526 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Asus G703 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	506 MBit/s ∼73% -27%


295 cd/m²	316 cd/m²	304 cd/m²
295 cd/m²	335 cd/m²	312 cd/m²
276 cd/m²	276 cd/m²	288 cd/m²

Fényerő megoszlás

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 335 cd/m² Átlag: 299.7 cd/m² Minimum: 20.2 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 82 %
Centrumban: 340 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 479:1 (Fekete: 0.7 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.99 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 1.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.49

ICC Fájl (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY AUO_B173HAN03, , 1920x1080, 17.3	Asus G703 AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), , 1920x1080, 17.3	MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), , 1920x1080, 17.3	HP Omen X 17-ap0xx AU Optronics B173HW01, , 1920x1080, 17.3	Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 ID: AUO169D, Name: AU Optronics B173HAN01.6, , 1920x1080, 17.3	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), , 3840x2160, 17.3
Response Times		-25%	41%	-233%	-238%	-221%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	14 (7, 7)	17.6 (8.4, 9.2) -26%	8 (4.4, 3.6) 43%	44 (22, 22) -214%	36.8 (19.6, 17.2) -163%	50 (24.4, 25.6) -257%
Response Time Black / White *	9 (5, 4)	11.2 (6, 5.2) -24%	5.6 (3.8, 1.8) 38%	31.6 (16, 15.6) -251%	37.2 (21.6, 15.6) -313%	25.6 (11.2, 14.4) -184%
PWM Frequency			26000 (19)
Screen		18%	35%	24%	27%	34%
Brightness middle	335	274 -18%	240 -28%	343 2%	367.4 10%	343 2%
Brightness	300	268 -11%	248 -17%	332 11%	363 21%	328 9%
Brightness Distribution	82	80 -2%	83 1%	83 1%	86 5%	84 2%
Black Level *	0.7	0.29 59%	0.22 69%	0.35 50%	0.32 54%	0.29 59%
Contrast	479	945 97%	1091 128%	980 105%	1148 140%	1183 147%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	4.99	3.99 20%	2.14 57%	3.35 33%	3.8 24%	4.01 20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	9.32	7.33 21%	5.04 46%	5.62 40%	10.4 -12%	6.03 35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *	1.93	1.79 7%	1.54 20%	2.5 -30%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	5.2	4.14 20%	1.62 69%	2.4 54%	3.5 33%	4.7 10%
Gamma	2.49 ^96%	2.58 ^93%	2.28 ^105%	2.35 ^102%	2.18 ^110%	2.4 ^100%
CCT	7719 ^84%	7352 ^88%	6846 ^95%	6495 ^100%	6467 ^101%	6451 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	59	60 2%	77 31%	57 -3%	58.1 -2%	88 49%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	91	92 1%	100 10%	88 -3%	89.3 -2%	100 10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-4% / 11%	38% / 36%	-105% / -16%	-106% / -17%	-94% / -8%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.8 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan Intel Core i9-8950HK	205 Points ∼100% +18%
Asus G703 Intel Core i7-7820HK	185 Points ∼90% +7%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY Intel Core i7-8750H	173 Points ∼84%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (163 - 177, n=30)	173 Points ∼84% 0%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx Intel Core i7-7820HK	162 Points ∼79% -6%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	160 Points ∼78% -8%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ Intel Core i7-7700HQ	157 Points ∼77% -9%
Average of class Gaming (79 - 207, n=400)	151 Points ∼74% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan Intel Core i9-8950HK	1378 Points ∼100% +37%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (915 - 1251, n=31)	1099 Points ∼80% +9%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY Intel Core i7-8750H	1007 Points ∼73%
Asus G703 Intel Core i7-7820HK	932 Points ∼68% -7%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx Intel Core i7-7820HK	770 Points ∼56% -24%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	733 Points ∼53% -27%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ Intel Core i7-7700HQ	732 Points ∼53% -27%
Average of class Gaming (196 - 1408, n=401)	732 Points ∼53% -27%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

173 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1007 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

125.8 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Segítség

... összehasonlítva

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus G703 GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)	6016 Points ∼100% +2%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A	5872 Points ∼98%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)	5801 Points ∼96% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) (5210 - 5968, n=6)	5621 Points ∼93% -4%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	5450 Points ∼91% -7%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP	5159 Points ∼86% -12%
Acer Predator Helios 300 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7	5116 Points ∼85% -13%
Average of class Gaming (2484 - 6515, n=298)	4900 Points ∼81% -17%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	4541 Points ∼75% -23%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G703 GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)	5944 Points ∼100% +9%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)	5720 Points ∼96% +5%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A	5431 Points ∼91%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	5221 Points ∼88% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) (4271 - 5557, n=6)	4962 Points ∼83% -9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7	4874 Points ∼82% -10%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	4395 Points ∼74% -19%
Average of class Gaming (2554 - 6093, n=316)	4209 Points ∼71% -23%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP	4207 Points ∼71% -23%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5431 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5872 pontok
Segítség

	Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A	Asus G703 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)	MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)	HP Omen X 17-ap0xx Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP	Average SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		157%	96%	67%	17%	0%
Write 4K	79.18	160.7 103%	111.8 41%	148.8 88%	155.1 96%	79.2 0%
Read 4K	39.69	54.82 38%	42.09 6%	46.64 18%	44.22 11%	39.7 0%
Write Seq	949.6	2738 188%	2288 141%	1216 28%	311.2 -67%	950 0%
Read Seq	1087	3346 208%	3321 206%	1461 34%	1247 15%	1087 0%
Write 4K Q32T1	189.6	612.4 223%	308.3 63%	444 134%	310.3 64%	190 0%
Read 4K Q32T1	304	708.7 133%	364.9 20%	535 76%	551.2 81%	304 0%
Write Seq Q32T1	947.7	3082 225%	2440 157%	1210 28%	311.5 -67%	948 0%
Read Seq Q32T1	1488	3505 136%	3485 134%	3450 132%	1560 5%	1488 0%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1488 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 947.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 304 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 189.6 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1087 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 949.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 39.69 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 79.18 MB/s

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G703 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK	22160 Points ∼100% +26%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-8950HK	21422 Points ∼97% +21%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK	20307 Points ∼92% +15%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H	17649 Points ∼80%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) (15718 - 19059, n=55)	17218 Points ∼78% -2%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	16847 Points ∼76% -5%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	11049 Points ∼50% -37%
Average of class Gaming (385 - 40636, n=430)	10223 Points ∼46% -42%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus G703 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK	143992 Points ∼100%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-8950HK	140768 Points ∼98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) (64973 - 125922, n=50)	98878 Points ∼69%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	94246 Points ∼65%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK	88432 Points ∼61%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ	77354 Points ∼54%
Average of class Gaming (5761 - 184578, n=421)	61660 Points ∼43%

3DMark Fire Strike Score		15019 pontok
3DMark Time Spy Score		5741 pontok
Segítség

Dirt Rally - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A	119 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) (84.7 - 119, n=3)	102 fps ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming (32.7 - 168, n=29)	76.2 fps ∼64% -36%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus G703 GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)	77.9 fps ∼100% +37%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)	76.8 fps ∼99% +35%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	65 fps ∼83% +14%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	59.4 fps ∼76% +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) (48.2 - 68.4, n=40)	59 fps ∼76% +4%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A	57 fps ∼73%
Average of class Gaming (12.6 - 115, n=205)	45.1 fps ∼58% -21%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP	38.3 fps ∼49% -33%

Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	136 fps ∼100% +11%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A	122 fps ∼90%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) (95.4 - 122, n=9)	105 fps ∼77% -14%
Average of class Gaming (19.8 - 168, n=80)	71 fps ∼52% -42%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP	66.8 fps ∼49% -45%

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	109 fps ∼100% +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) (79.1 - 103, n=25)	92.3 fps ∼85% +3%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A	90 fps ∼83%
Average of class Gaming (8.9 - 126, n=135)	62.7 fps ∼58% -30%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP	58.7 fps ∼54% -35%

Resident Evil 7 - 1920x1080 Very High / On AA:FXAA+T
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	163 fps ∼100% +11%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A	147 fps ∼90%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) (130 - 162, n=6)	139 fps ∼85% -5%
Average of class Gaming (19.8 - 234, n=27)	113 fps ∼69% -23%

Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A	95 fps ∼100%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	92 fps ∼97% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) (70 - 95, n=5)	81.2 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming (24.2 - 95, n=21)	70.5 fps ∼74% -26%

F1 2017 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	108 (min: 82, max: 118) fps ∼100% +11%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A	97 fps ∼90%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) (88 - 102, n=5)	94.8 fps ∼88% -2%
Average of class Gaming (20 - 115, n=27)	77.4 fps ∼72% -20%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP	61 fps ∼56% -37%

Call of Duty WWII - 1920x1080 Extra / On AA:Filmic T2X SM
Asus G703 GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)	136 fps ∼100% +43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) (95 - 122, n=6)	110 fps ∼81% +16%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A	95 fps ∼70%
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 149, n=20)	89.3 fps ∼66% -6%

Star Wars Battlefront 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus G703 GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)	124 fps ∼100% +35%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)	121 fps ∼98% +32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) (90.7 - 104, n=5)	97.4 fps ∼79% +6%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A	92 fps ∼74%
Average of class Gaming (10.1 - 124, n=19)	76.9 fps ∼62% -16%

Kingdom Come: Deliverance - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A	82 fps ∼100%
Asus G703 GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)	76.4 fps ∼93% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) (54.2 - 82, n=5)	65.5 fps ∼80% -20%
Average of class Gaming (7.5 - 82, n=21)	49.2 fps ∼60% -40%

Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A The Witcher 3 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+): Ø58.5 (36-65)

HP Omen X 17-ap0xx GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP The Witcher 3 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+): Ø65.3 (58-71)

Asus G703 GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0) The Witcher 3 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+): Ø71.8 (67-75)

MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) The Witcher 3 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+): Ø72.3 (68-76)

Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP The Witcher 3 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+): Ø36.1 (32-40)

Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 The Witcher 3 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+): Ø57.6 (54-61)

	alacsony	közepes	magas	ultra
Dirt Rally (2015)				119	fps
The Witcher 3 (2015)			110	57	fps
Fallout 4 (2015)			133	122	fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)			108	90	fps
Battlefield 1 (2016)			127	118	fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017)			163	147	fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)			131	95	fps
F1 2017 (2017)			140	97	fps
Call of Duty WWII (2017)			130	95	fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017)			113	92	fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)			59	82	fps

Zajszint

Üresjárat		31.2 / 35.3 / 35.3 dB(A)
HDD		31 dB(A)
Terhelés		44.4 / 45.2 dB(A)

	30 dB csendes 40 dB(A) hallható 50 dB(A) hangos
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A)

Max. terhelés

Üresjárat

Witcher 3


38.7 °C	42.6 °C	33.4 °C
35.1 °C	39 °C	33.2 °C
28.2 °C	27 °C	28.3 °C

Maximum: 42.6 °C
Átlag: 33.9 °C


37.2 °C	34.2 °C	35 °C
30.9 °C	30.1 °C	29.4 °C
27 °C	27 °C	26.9 °C

Maximum: 37.2 °C
Átlag: 30.8 °C

Tápegység (max.) 44.9 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 23.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Max. terhelés

Üresjárat

Witcher 3


32 °C	33.6 °C	29.4 °C
31.2 °C	31.3 °C	29.7 °C
28.9 °C	26 °C	30.6 °C

Maximum: 33.6 °C
Átlag: 30.1 °C


31 °C	28.4 °C	29.5 °C
28.8 °C	29.6 °C	29.9 °C
28.3 °C	26.7 °C	26.3 °C

Maximum: 31 °C
Átlag: 28.7 °C

Tápegység (max.) 37.9 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 23.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Max. terhelés

Üresjárat

Witcher 3


43.9 °C	45.3 °C	40.1 °C
39.1 °C	41.9 °C	39.8 °C
30.2 °C	31 °C	28.7 °C

Maximum: 45.3 °C
Átlag: 37.8 °C


49 °C	38.5 °C	41.2 °C
35.4 °C	34.5 °C	31.5 °C
38.2 °C	37 °C	28.3 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Átlag: 42.5 °C

Tápegység (max.) 45.5 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 24.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP Omen X 17-ap0xx audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás

Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét	0.28 / 0.82 Watt
Üresjárat	20.4 / 26.5 / 37 Watt
Terhelés	129 / 216 Watt


Kulcs: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY 8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3	Acer Predator Helios 300 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 17.3	Asus G703 7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3	MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan 8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3	HP Omen X 17-ap0xx 7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3	Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3	Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		43%	-22%	-37%	6%	42%	-3%	4%	12%
Idle Minimum *	20.4	7 66%	26 -27%	31 -52%	21.6 -6%	10.6 48%	23 -13%	20.9 (9 - 31, n=53) -2%	20.4 (3.9 - 113, n=590) -0%
Idle Average *	26.5	13 51%	30 -13%	35 -32%	26.4 -0%	16 40%	33 -25%	26.3 (14 - 38.6, n=53) 1%	26 (6.8 - 119, n=590) 2%
Idle Maximum *	37	20 46%	37 -0%	45 -22%	26.6 28%	16.4 56%	40 -8%	31.7 (19 - 49.2, n=53) 14%	31.1 (8.3 - 122, n=590) 16%
Load Average *	129	81 37%	123 5%	130 -1%	95.6 26%	75.9 41%	94 27%	118 (82 - 234, n=53) 9%	105 (14.1 - 319, n=581) 19%
Load Maximum *	216	162 25%	341 -58%	374 -73%	199.6 8%	163.8 24%	228 -6%	219 (170 - 309, n=53) -1%	166 (21.9 - 590, n=580) 23%
Witcher 3 ultra *	186	127 32%	257 -38%	268 -44%	221.7 -19%	111.2 40%	177 5%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
	Felbontás	Beállítások	Érték
	1920x1080	Witcher 3 ultra 150cd	66 min
		WiFi Websurfing 1.3	174 min

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit összehasonlítva
Lenovo B50-30 (min) N2815, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	49
...
Razer Blade 15 2018 8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	983
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 8600K, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)	991
Asus GL703GE-ES73 8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)	1005
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY 8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)	1007
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	1015
Eurocom Q6 8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	1050
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin 8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	1053
...
Apple iMac Pro (max) W-2145, Pro Vega 56	1686