Acer Predator Helios 500 (GTX 1070, i7-8750H) Laptop rövid értékelés
» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Average of class Gaming (141 - 1670, n=365) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Asus G703 | |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Average of class Gaming (144 - 1645, n=365) | |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
Asus G703 |
|
Fényerő megoszlás: 82 %
Centrumban: 340 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 479:1 (Fekete: 0.7 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.99 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 1.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY AUO_B173HAN03, , 1920x1080, 17.30 | Asus G703 AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), , 1920x1080, 17.30 | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), , 1920x1080, 17.30 | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx AU Optronics B173HW01, , 1920x1080, 17.30 | Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 ID: AUO169D, Name: AU Optronics B173HAN01.6, , 1920x1080, 17.30 | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), , 3840x2160, 17.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -25% | 41% | -233% | -238% | -221% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14 (7, 7) | 17.6 (8.4, 9.2) -26% | 8 (4.4, 3.6) 43% | 44 (22, 22) -214% | 36.8 (19.6, 17.2) -163% | 50 (24.4, 25.6) -257% |
Response Time Black / White * | 9 (5, 4) | 11.2 (6, 5.2) -24% | 5.6 (3.8, 1.8) 38% | 31.6 (16, 15.6) -251% | 37.2 (21.6, 15.6) -313% | 25.6 (11.2, 14.4) -184% |
PWM Frequency | 26000 (19) | |||||
Screen | 18% | 35% | 24% | 27% | 34% | |
Brightness middle | 335 | 274 -18% | 240 -28% | 343 2% | 367.4 10% | 343 2% |
Brightness | 300 | 268 -11% | 248 -17% | 332 11% | 363 21% | 328 9% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 80 -2% | 83 1% | 83 1% | 86 5% | 84 2% |
Black Level * | 0.7 | 0.29 59% | 0.22 69% | 0.35 50% | 0.32 54% | 0.29 59% |
Contrast | 479 | 945 97% | 1091 128% | 980 105% | 1148 140% | 1183 147% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.99 | 3.99 20% | 2.14 57% | 3.35 33% | 3.8 24% | 4.01 20% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 9.32 | 7.33 21% | 5.04 46% | 5.62 40% | 10.4 -12% | 6.03 35% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 1.93 | 1.79 7% | 1.54 20% | 2.5 -30% | ||
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 5.2 | 4.14 20% | 1.62 69% | 2.4 54% | 3.5 33% | 4.7 10% |
Gamma | 2.49 88% | 2.58 85% | 2.28 96% | 2.35 94% | 2.18 101% | 2.4 92% |
CCT | 7719 84% | 7352 88% | 6846 95% | 6495 100% | 6467 101% | 6451 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 60 2% | 77 31% | 57 -3% | 58.1 -2% | 88 49% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 92 1% | 100 10% | 88 -3% | 89.3 -2% | 100 10% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
11% | 38% /
36% | -105% /
-16% | -106% /
-17% | -94% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Asus G703 | |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY | |
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (163 - 177, n=86) | |
Average of class Gaming (77 - 220, n=637) | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (863 - 1251, n=93) | |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY | |
Average of class Gaming (196 - 2804, n=645) | |
Asus G703 | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ |
PCMark 8 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus G703 | |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (5210 - 5968, n=6) | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
Average of class Gaming (2484 - 6825, n=466) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus G703 | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (4271 - 5557, n=6) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
Average of class Gaming (2554 - 6093, n=483) | |
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5431 pontok | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5872 pontok | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5589 pontok | |
Segítség |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A | Asus G703 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0) | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP | Average SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 157% | 96% | 67% | 17% | 0% | |
Write 4K | 79.18 | 160.7 103% | 111.8 41% | 148.8 88% | 155.1 96% | 79.2 0% |
Read 4K | 39.69 | 54.82 38% | 42.09 6% | 46.64 18% | 44.22 11% | 39.7 0% |
Write Seq | 949.6 | 2738 188% | 2288 141% | 1216 28% | 311.2 -67% | 950 0% |
Read Seq | 1087 | 3346 208% | 3321 206% | 1461 34% | 1247 15% | 1087 0% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 189.6 | 612.4 223% | 308.3 63% | 444 134% | 310.3 64% | 190 0% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 304 | 708.7 133% | 364.9 20% | 535 76% | 551.2 81% | 304 0% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 947.7 | 3082 225% | 2440 157% | 1210 28% | 311.5 -67% | 948 0% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1488 | 3505 136% | 3485 134% | 3450 132% | 1560 5% | 1488 0% |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Asus G703 | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (15718 - 19059, n=56) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
Average of class Gaming (385 - 40636, n=658) | |
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Asus G703 | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (64973 - 125922, n=51) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
Average of class Gaming (5761 - 184578, n=625) |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15019 pontok | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5741 pontok | |
Segítség |
Dirt Rally - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS | |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (84.7 - 119, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (32.7 - 168, n=30) |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus G703 | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (48.2 - 68.4, n=41) | |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY | |
Average of class Gaming (12.6 - 115, n=426) | |
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 |
Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (95.4 - 122, n=9) | |
Average of class Gaming (19.8 - 168, n=80) | |
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (79.1 - 103, n=25) | |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY | |
Average of class Gaming (8.9 - 159, n=173) | |
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 |
Resident Evil 7 - 1920x1080 Very High / On AA:FXAA+T | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (130 - 162, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (19.8 - 234, n=29) |
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (70 - 95, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (24.2 - 139, n=24) |
F1 2017 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (88 - 102, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (20 - 115, n=27) | |
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 |
Call of Duty WWII - 1920x1080 Extra / On AA:Filmic T2X SM | |
Asus G703 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (95 - 122, n=6) | |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY | |
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 149, n=22) |
Star Wars Battlefront 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Asus G703 | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (90.7 - 104, n=5) | |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY | |
Average of class Gaming (10.1 - 124, n=21) |
Kingdom Come: Deliverance - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset | |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY | |
Asus G703 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (54.2 - 82, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (7.5 - 82.5, n=32) |
alacsony | közepes | magas | ultra | ||
Dirt Rally (2015) | 119 | fps | |||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 110 | 57 | fps | ||
Fallout 4 (2015) | 133 | 122 | fps | ||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 108 | 90 | fps | ||
Battlefield 1 (2016) | 127 | 118 | fps | ||
Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 163 | 147 | fps | ||
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 131 | 95 | fps | ||
F1 2017 (2017) | 140 | 97 | fps | ||
Call of Duty WWII (2017) | 130 | 95 | fps | ||
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 113 | 92 | fps | ||
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 59 | 82 | fps |
Zajszint
Üresjárat |
| 31.2 / 35.3 / 35.3 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 31 dB(A) |
Terhelés |
| 44.4 / 45.2 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB csendes 40 dB(A) hallható 50 dB(A) hangos |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 42.7 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.2 °C / -4 F).
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | ![]() ![]() |
Üresjárat | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Terhelés |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Kulcs:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Acer Predator Helios 300 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Asus G703 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.30 | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 43% | -22% | -37% | 6% | 42% | -3% | 4% | 15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 20.4 | 7 66% | 26 -27% | 31 -52% | 21.6 -6% | 10.6 48% | 23 -13% | 21 (9 - 31, n=54) -3% | 18.7 (1.9 - 113, n=801) 8% |
Idle Average * | 26.5 | 13 51% | 30 -13% | 35 -32% | 26.4 -0% | 16 40% | 33 -25% | 26.4 (14 - 38.6, n=54) -0% | 24.1 (6 - 119, n=801) 9% |
Idle Maximum * | 37 | 20 46% | 37 -0% | 45 -22% | 26.6 28% | 16.4 56% | 40 -8% | 31.8 (19 - 49.2, n=54) 14% | 29.7 (8.3 - 122, n=801) 20% |
Load Average * | 129 | 81 37% | 123 5% | 130 -1% | 95.6 26% | 75.9 41% | 94 27% | 118 (82 - 234, n=54) 9% | 104 (14.1 - 319, n=793) 19% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 186 | 127 32% | 257 -38% | 268 -44% | 221.7 -19% | 111.2 40% | 177 5% | ||
Load Maximum * | 216 | 162 25% | 341 -58% | 374 -73% | 199.6 8% | 163.8 24% | 228 -6% | 219 (170 - 309, n=54) -1% | 177 (21.9 - 590, n=792) 18% |
* ... smaller is better
Battery Runtime | |||
Felbontás | Beállítások | Érték | |
1920x1080 | Witcher 3 ultra 150cd | 66 min | |
WiFi Websurfing 1.3 | 174 min |
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 72 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 300 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 48 Wh | Asus G703 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 71 Wh | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh | Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 88 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 54% | -24% | -20% | 54% | 103% | 19% | 20% | |
Reader / Idle | 253 | 611 142% | 200 -21% | 225 -11% | 348 38% | 721 185% | 323 28% | 367 (39 - 1399, n=742) 45% |
WiFi v1.3 | 174 | 279 60% | 151 -13% | 333 91% | 419 141% | 218 25% | 271 (62 - 683, n=467) 56% | |
Witcher 3 ultra | 66 | 59 (50 - 74, n=7) -11% | ||||||
Load | 88 | 54 -39% | 54 -39% | 63 -28% | 117 33% | 72 -18% | 91 3% | 80.1 (18 - 243, n=710) -9% |
H.264 | 281 | 143 | 174 | 278 (88 - 860, n=175) |
Pro
Kontra
Az Acer Predator Helios 500 egy jól kialakított gamer erőgép, játékok terén több előnnyel, mint hátránnyal. Természetesen, még ez a 17 colos gép sem tökéletes, így részletes elemzése szükséges.
A kijelző például egyértelműen játékra készült. 144 Hz-es, nagyon gyors válaszidejű. A színhűsége kitűnő, legalábbis manuális kalibráció után. Az sRGB lefedettsége nem teljes, és az 500:1 kontrasztarány is túl alacsony. Ennek megfelelően a fekete némileg szürkének tűnik rajta.
A gép teljesítményét figyelembe véve a kibocsátásai több, mint elfogadhatók voltak. A felhasználók választhatnak, hogy feljebb kapcsolják-e a hűtést (Cool Boost), illetve hogy kicsit tuningolnak-e a GPU-n (GPU turbo). Az automata ventilátorvezérléssel a gép elég halk volt ahhoz, hogy a legtöbb irodai környezetbe tökéletesen illeszkedjen, sőt a ventilátorok néha teljesen le is kapcsoltak.
A kivitelezés minősége nem tökéletes, de a műanyag ház nagyjából elég merev. A két Thunderbolt 3 port különösen tetszett, az SD olvasó hiánya már nem annyira.
A karbantarthatósága remek, a bővíthetősége kitűnő. Egyebek között a RAM (max. 64 GB) és háttértár (2x M.2 SSD RAID, 2.5-inch HDD) is bővíthető. Az M.2 támogatás sajnos csak SATA, nem pedig a gyorsabb NVMe protokoll.
A hangrendszer remek, de nem olyan zseniális, mint nagy testvérén, a Predator 17-en. A háttérvilágításos beviteli eszközök megfelelők, és a gép teljesítményéhez képest a tömege sem vészes.
A notebook alapjárati áramfelvétele nagyon magas, a telep üzemideje pedig elég rövid. Sem a webkamera, sem a mikrofon nem illik egy ilyen árú laptopba, egy 400 dolláros gépbe valók lennének inkább.
Amennyiben ezeket a hátrányokat túl soknak ítéljük, vagy az árat magasnak találjuk, az Acer Predator Helios 300 is megér egy pillantást, amely kicsivel $1,000 (GTX 1050 Ti), illetve $1,300 (GTX 1060) feletti áron kapható. Az mindenesetre biztos, hogy a 300 a jelenleg tesztelt gépnél jobb energiahatékonyságú.
Hamarosan teszteljük Helios 500 más konfigurációit is, például a csúcsmodellt, amelyet az Intel Core i9-8950HK-val (2.9 - 4.8 GHz) szereltek fel.
Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY - 05/29/2018 v6(old)
Sebastian Jentsch