Notebookcheck

Acer Predator Helios 300 (7700HQ, GTX 1060, full-HD) Laptop rövid értékelés

Sebastian Bade (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 08/23/2017
Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Notebook Windows

Egy karcsú gamer! Az Acer Predator Helios 300 egy gaming notebook, amelynek tömege kevesebb, mint 3 kg (~106 oz). Képes a hűtése elegendő friss levegővel ellátni a viszonylag kompakt készüléket? Részletes értékelésünkből kiderül.

Acer Predator Helios 300 (Predator Helios Széria)
Processzor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Grafikus adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Mag: 1455 MHz, Memória: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 384.94, Nvidia Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2400, 2/2 hely foglalt, max. 32 GB
Kijelző
17.3 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), AH-IPS, WLED, 262K, 60Hz, LCM, a-Si TFT-LCD, fényes: nem
Alaplap
HM175
Háttértár
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, 512 GB 
, M.2 2280
Hangkártya
Realtek High Definition Audio
Csatlakozók
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington zár, Audió csatlakozók: 1x 3.5 mm-es audio jack, Kártyaolvasó: MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC
Hálózat
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4 (a/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 29 x 432 x 290
Akkumulátor
48 Wh, 3220 mAh Lítium-Polimer, 4 cellás
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webkamera: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: sztereo, Billentyűzet: chicklet, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, 180 wattos hálózati adapter, 24 Hónap Garancia
Súly
2.876 kg, Tápegység: 584 g
Ár
1800 EUR
Hivatkozások
Acer honlap
Acer noteszgépek

 

Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
Acer Predator Helios 300
left: Kensington Lock, RJ45, USB 3.1 Type-C, HDMI, USB 3.0, SD card reader
left: Kensington Lock, RJ45, USB 3.1 Type-C, HDMI, USB 3.0, SD card reader
right: combined audio jack (Mic-In, Line-Out), 2x USB 2.0, LED lights, power supply
right: combined audio jack (Mic-In, Line-Out), 2x USB 2.0, LED lights, power supply
front: no ports
front: no ports
back: no ports
back: no ports

» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép 
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Predator Helios 300
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s ∼100%
Gigabyte P57X v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.2 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Nexoc G739
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼99% -1%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼96% -4%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
66.1 MB/s ∼84% -16%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23 MB/s ∼29% -71%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
20 MB/s ∼25% -75%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus GL753VE-DS74
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
92.3 MB/s ∼100% +10%
Gigabyte P57X v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90.4 MB/s ∼98% +8%
Nexoc G739
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼94% +4%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼94% +4%
Acer Predator Helios 300
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84 MB/s ∼91%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.3 MB/s ∼25% -72%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
20 MB/s ∼22% -76%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
702 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
696 MBit/s ∼99%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
Qualcomm/Atheros QCA6174
638 MBit/s ∼91% -8%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
618 MBit/s ∼88% -11%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
443 MBit/s ∼63% -36%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
308 MBit/s ∼44% -56%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
Qualcomm/Atheros QCA6174
626 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
545 MBit/s ∼87%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
497 MBit/s ∼79% -9%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
443 MBit/s ∼71% -19%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
388 MBit/s ∼62% -29%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
299 MBit/s ∼48% -45%
377
cd/m²		378
cd/m²		378
cd/m²
378
cd/m²		384
cd/m²		381
cd/m²
361
cd/m²		366
cd/m²		358
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 384 cd/m² Átlag: 373.4 cd/m² Minimum: 33 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 93 %
Centrumban: 384 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1097:1 (Fekete: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.81 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.33 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
86% sRGB (Argyll) 56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.45
Acer Predator Helios 300
LG LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), 1920x1080, 17.3		Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, 3840x2160, 17.3		Asus GL753VE-DS74
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080, 17.3		MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3		HP Omen 17-an014ng
AUO149D, 1920x1080, 17.3		Gigabyte P57X v7
SHP145E, 3840x2160, 17.3		Nexoc G739
CMN1738, 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
-8%
-5%
41%
-39%
-96%
-55%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36 (18, 18)
29 (14, 15)
19%
36 (18.4, 17.6)
-0%
28 (12, 16)
22%
45.2 (20.8, 24.4)
-26%
55.6 (18.4, 37.2)
-54%
45 (20, 25)
-25%
Response Time Black / White *
20 (8.4, 11.6)
27 (16, 11)
-35%
22 (12.4, 9.6)
-10%
8 (5, 3)
60%
30.4 (16.4, 14)
-52%
46.8 (10.4, 36.4)
-134%
28 (7, 21)
-40%
PWM Frequency
119000 (85)
1000 (29)
-99%
450 (90)
-100%
Screen
7%
2%
10%
6%
5%
7%
Brightness middle
384
380
-1%
366
-5%
270
-30%
314
-18%
441.3
15%
312
-19%
Brightness
373
336
-10%
348
-7%
254
-32%
309
-17%
408
9%
304
-18%
Brightness Distribution
93
81
-13%
90
-3%
86
-8%
88
-5%
86
-8%
85
-9%
Black Level *
0.35
0.32
9%
0.35
-0%
0.26
26%
0.34
3%
0.44
-26%
0.23
34%
Contrast
1097
1188
8%
1046
-5%
1038
-5%
924
-16%
1003
-9%
1357
24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.81
5.32
-11%
4.4
9%
3.33
31%
3.19
34%
5.1
-6%
4.19
13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.69
7.63
12%
9.7
-12%
6.07
30%
6.1
30%
9.8
-13%
8.7
-0%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.33
4.9
8%
3
44%
3.46
35%
3.49
35%
4.3
19%
3.72
30%
Gamma
2.45 98%
2.61 92%
2.1 114%
2.13 113%
2.34 103%
2.08 115%
2.29 105%
CCT
7137 91%
6558 99%
6362 102%
7419 88%
7261 90%
7345 88%
7104 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
56
87.2
56%
56
0%
75
34%
60
7%
87
55%
59
5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86
100
16%
86
0%
100
16%
93
8%
100
16%
91
6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1% / 5%
-2% / 1%
26% / 15%
-17% / -1%
-46% / -18%
-24% / -8%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.3 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 119000 Hz ≤ 85 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 119000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 85 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 119000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9953 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC latencies
Intel Extreme Utility
Intel Extreme Utility (benchmark)
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼100% +1%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼99% 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼99%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points ∼94% -4%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
144 Points ∼89% -9%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼87% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
743 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
738 Points ∼99% 0%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points ∼99% 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points ∼99%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points ∼99% 0%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points ∼99% 0%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points ∼91% -8%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼100% +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points ∼99%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.71 Points ∼94% -6%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.61 Points ∼88% -11%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.55 Points ∼85% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points ∼100% 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points ∼100%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.06 Points ∼99% -1%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.04 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.39 Points ∼91% -9%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
272.1 Points ∼100% +9%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
268 Points ∼98% +7%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
258.9 Points ∼95% +3%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
250.74 Points ∼92%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
221.52 Points ∼81% -12%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
213.9 Points ∼79% -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1178.6 ms * ∼100% -22%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1113.7 ms * ∼94% -16%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
962.7 ms * ∼82%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
960.4 ms * ∼81% -0%
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
918.8 ms * ∼78% +5%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
41110 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
40882 Points ∼99% +12%
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
36449 Points ∼89%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
32512 Points ∼79% -11%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
30722 Points ∼75% -16%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6821
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22143
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5874
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6821 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
28891 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
7651 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.14 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
66.09 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.81 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
735 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
159 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
99.93 fps
Segítség
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5289 Points ∼100% +3%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5243 Points ∼99% +2%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
5171 Points ∼98% +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
5116 Points ∼97%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4831 Points ∼91% -6%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4218 Points ∼80% -18%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
4207 Points ∼80% -18%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4989 Points ∼100% +2%
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
4874 Points ∼98%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4270 Points ∼86% -12%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
3985 Points ∼80% -18%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
3570 Points ∼72% -27%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
3569 Points ∼72% -27%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
3444 Points ∼69% -29%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4874 pontok
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7411 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5116 pontok
Segítség
AS SSD
AS SSD
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskInfo
CrystalDiskInfo
ATTO
ATTO
Acer Predator Helios 300
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7		Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7		Asus GL753VE-DS74
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7		MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY		HP Omen 17-an014ng
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		Gigabyte P57X v7
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)		Nexoc G739
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-3%
-21%
-39%
66%
-36%
64%
Write 4k QD32
404.5
496.9
23%
264
-35%
178.1
-56%
523.4
29%
296
-27%
544.4
35%
Read 4k QD32
457.7
459.2
0%
57.8
-87%
335.4
-27%
582.1
27%
281.3
-39%
635.7
39%
Write 4k
125.5
123.4
-2%
108
-14%
86.83
-31%
144.9
15%
82.25
-34%
154.5
23%
Read 4k
34.29
10.46
-69%
14.1
-59%
21.23
-38%
59.06
72%
26.04
-24%
60.74
77%
Write 512
425.9
429.3
1%
458
8%
247.2
-42%
853.5
100%
306.1
-28%
826.7
94%
Read 512
579.6
724.8
25%
583
1%
427.2
-26%
1044
80%
315
-46%
856.5
48%
Write Seq
568.6
580.8
2%
584
3%
274.6
-52%
1212
113%
305.7
-46%
1192
110%
Read Seq
899.2
880.4
-2%
1049
17%
509.7
-43%
1736
93%
516.8
-43%
1666
85%
hddimg
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
Sequential Read: 899.2 MB/s
Sequential Write: 568.6 MB/s
512K Read: 579.6 MB/s
512K Write: 425.9 MB/s
4K Read: 34.29 MB/s
4K Write: 125.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 457.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 404.5 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 17-an014ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17289 Points ∼100% +44%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17170 Points ∼99% +43%
Acer Predator Helios 300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
12009 Points ∼69%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11617 Points ∼67% -3%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11546 Points ∼67% -4%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
8027 Points ∼46% -33%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7531 Points ∼44% -37%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 17-an014ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
108657 Points ∼100% +31%
Acer Predator Helios 300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
82678 Points ∼76%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
75190 Points ∼69% -9%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
66406 Points ∼61% -20%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
51987 Points ∼48% -37%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
47807 Points ∼44% -42%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
23243 Points ∼100% +49%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
21918 Points ∼94% +40%
Acer Predator Helios 300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15607 Points ∼67%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15019 Points ∼65% -4%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14556 Points ∼63% -7%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
10008 Points ∼43% -36%
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark 11
3DMark 11
3DMark 11 Performance
12812 pontok
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
135605 pontok
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
26341 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10144 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
5349 pontok
3DMark Time Spy Score
3854 pontok
Segítség
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite | Ghost Recon Wildlands | Battlefield 1 | Far Cry Primal | Deus Ex Mankind Divided | For Honor
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
58 fps ∼100% +49%
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
38.9 (min: 31, max: 45) fps ∼67%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
37.2 (min: 25, max: 45) fps ∼64% -4%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
32 fps ∼55% -18%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
27.6 fps ∼48% -29%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
130 fps ∼100% +49%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
108 fps ∼83% +23%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
98 (min: 11.6, max: 188.3) fps ∼75% +12%
Asus GL753VE-DS74
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
97 fps ∼75% +11%
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
87.5 fps ∼67%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
72.5 fps ∼56% -17%
Ghost Recon Wildlands - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
38.4 (min: 33.5, max: 42.9) fps ∼100%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
36.2 fps ∼94% -6%
Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
83.6 (min: 75, max: 89) fps ∼100%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
50.8 fps ∼61% -39%
Far Cry Primal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
62 (min: 50, max: 75) fps ∼100%
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
62 (min: 50, max: 75) fps ∼100% 0%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
58 fps ∼94% -6%
Deus Ex Mankind Divided - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:2xMS AF:8x
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
31.2 (min: 24.4, max: 39.8) fps ∼100%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
30.1 (min: 23.4, max: 38.6) fps ∼96% -4%
For Honor - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x
Acer Predator Helios 300
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
72.3 (min: 54.3, max: 99.8) fps ∼100%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
71.3 fps ∼99% -1%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
46.1 fps ∼64% -36%
alacsony közepes magas ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 255.5204.6194.787.5fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 199.9198.6195.910649.8fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 198.313571.738.926.1fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 203.1135.377.865.727.2fps
Far Cry Primal (2016) 12292826226fps
The Division (2016) 217.3146.373.357.426.9fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 140.4109.159.931.219.1fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 177.8142.593.283.632.8fps
For Honor (2017) 226107.1101.172.330.2fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 14073.667.238.425.3fps
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) 131.485.759.353.821.5fps

Zajszint

Üresjárat
31 / 32 / 33 dB(A)
Terhelés
44 / 50 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
csendes
40 dB(A)
hallható
50 dB(A)
hangos
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
Acer Predator Helios 300
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)		Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)		Asus GL753VE-DS74
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)		MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)		HP Omen 17-an014ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)		Gigabyte P57X v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)		Nexoc G739
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Noise
5%
0%
-4%
-6%
1%
-2%
off / environment *
31
30.8
1%
29.1
6%
31
-0%
30
3%
29
6%
30
3%
Idle Minimum *
31
31.4
-1%
33.3
-7%
34
-10%
30
3%
30.4
2%
31
-0%
Idle Average *
32
31.4
2%
33.3
-4%
35
-9%
37
-16%
32.1
-0%
32
-0%
Idle Maximum *
33
31.4
5%
33.4
-1%
36
-9%
39
-18%
32.1
3%
38
-15%
Load Average *
44
38.6
12%
42.6
3%
40
9%
44
-0%
45.6
-4%
44
-0%
Witcher 3 ultra *
46
46.8
-2%
47
-2%
Load Maximum *
50
44.3
11%
46.8
6%
51
-2%
55
-10%
51.5
-3%
50
-0%

* ... smaller is better

stress test: Prime95 only
stress test: Prime95 only
stress test: FurMark only
stress test: FurMark only
stress test: FurMark + Prime95
stress test: FurMark + Prime95
Max. terhelés
 56 °C57 °C50 °C 
 56 °C56 °C36 °C 
 35 °C32 °C28 °C 
Maximum: 57 °C
Átlag: 45.1 °C
59 °C55 °C53 °C
33 °C50 °C52 °C
28 °C30 °C30 °C
Maximum: 59 °C
Átlag: 43.3 °C
Tápegység (max.)  50 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Acer Predator Helios 300
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)		Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)		Asus GL753VE-DS74
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)		MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)		HP Omen 17-an014ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)		Gigabyte P57X v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)		Nexoc G739
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Heat
9%
35%
13%
2%
10%
15%
Maximum Upper Side *
57
56
2%
35.8
37%
48.8
14%
48
16%
51.2
10%
50.6
11%
Maximum Bottom *
59
48.7
17%
36.4
38%
48.2
18%
54
8%
56.8
4%
50.8
14%
Idle Upper Side *
36
30.9
14%
22.2
38%
30.1
16%
35
3%
29.2
19%
28.7
20%
Idle Bottom *
31
30.6
1%
22.2
28%
30.4
2%
37
-19%
29.2
6%
27.1
13%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.542.22535.737.73132.530.24031.735.2502829.16328.330.78029.730.310026.938.312524.440.716022.436.920022.351.825022.462.731520.869.340019.970.750019.871.663018.975.880018.476.4100018.473.6125018.268.4160018.367.5200018.565.3250018.862.8315019.360.6400019.860.8500020.366.9630021.162.8800021.6601000022.261.9125002367.11600023.763SPL3281.3N1.650.5median 20.3Acer Predator Helios 300median 63Delta1.85.542.636.242.640.432.240.443.931.743.945.22945.246.428.846.45030.85051.428.351.453.428.953.454.824.554.857.62457.658.724.658.761.222.161.265.32265.363.720.863.765.820.365.870.819.370.870.118.670.168.517.968.570.317.770.371.81771.86417.16466.116.966.163.31763.360.616.960.657.616.957.663.11763.168.617.268.66717.16754.717.254.751.317.451.379.53079.5481.448median 63.7Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738Jmedian 17.7median 63.75.425.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Acer Predator Helios 300 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.3 / 0.6 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 7 / 13 / 20 Watt
Terhelés midlight 81 / 162 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Predator Helios 300
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)		Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)		Asus GL753VE-DS74
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)		MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)		HP Omen 17-an014ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)		Gigabyte P57X v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)		Nexoc G739
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Power Consumption
-25%
16%
-35%
-79%
-79%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
7
10.5
-50%
7.5
-7%
13
-86%
22
-214%
15.7
-124%
7
-0%
Idle Average *
13
20.5
-58%
11.3
13%
20
-54%
28
-115%
23.4
-80%
14
-8%
Idle Maximum *
20
22
-10%
11.8
41%
26
-30%
35
-75%
23.5
-18%
23
-15%
Load Average *
81
91
-12%
82.1
-1%
83
-2%
93
-15%
184.6
-128%
82
-1%
Load Maximum *
162
155
4%
116.6
28%
169
-4%
208
-28%
233.1
-44%
163
-1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
127
96.3
24%
157
-24%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
10h 11min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 40.15063.0.0)
4h 39min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 41min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
0h 54min
maximum battery runtime
maximum battery runtime
minimum battery runtime
minimum battery runtime
Wi-Fi battery runtime
Wi-Fi battery runtime
H.264 battery runtime
H.264 battery runtime
time needed for recharging
time needed for recharging
Acer Predator Helios 300
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 48 Wh		Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793-738J
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 69 Wh		Asus GL753VE-DS74
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 48 Wh		MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 51 Wh		HP Omen 17-an014ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 86 Wh		Gigabyte P57X v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75.81 Wh		Nexoc G739
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 62 Wh
Battery Runtime
-1%
-15%
-48%
0%
-7%
39%
Reader / Idle
611
520
-15%
196
-68%
349
-43%
256
-58%
613
0%
H.264
281
140
-50%
255
-9%
322
15%
WiFi v1.3
279
277
-1%
235
-16%
142
-49%
267
-4%
155
-44%
288
3%
Load
54
47
-13%
40
-26%
84
56%
98
81%
128
137%

Pro

+ egyedi megjelenés
+ könnyű
+ karcsú
+ GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB VRAM-mal
+ gyors Intel Core i7-7700HQ
+ jó beviteli eszközök
+ 512 GB SSD
+ matt kijelző, jó betekintési szögek
+ gyors rendszer
+ kis fogyasztás
+ remek csatlakozóeloszlás
+ jó árképzés

Kontra

- az elvárhatónál rosszabb hangminőség
- terhelés alatt erősen melegszik
- terhelés alatt magas hangon zúgó ventilátorok
- nehezen tisztítható hűtőrendszer
- csak egy szabad 2.5 inches slot van
- lehetne több csatlakozója
The Acer Predator Helios 300, provided by Acer Germany
The Acer Predator Helios 300, provided by Acer Germany

Az Acer Predator Helios 300 remek belépő szintű gamer gép. A 17 inches készülék egy gyors Intel Core i7-7700HQ-val, és egy Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060-nal van felszerelve, amelyek biztos alapot nyújtanak a mai játékok (natív) 1080p-ben történő futtatásához. A képkockaszám még maximális részletességen is rendben lesz. Az 1800 dolláros készülék 16 GB DDR4 RAM-mal és egy 512 GB-os NVMe SSD-vel is el van látva. Az Acer Predator Helios minden követelménynek megfelel, amelyet egy gaming laptoppal szemben támaszthatunk.

Az Acer Predator Helios 300 remek teljesítményt nyújt az áráért. A gyártó azonban a hangrendszerrel veszített jó pár pontot, az ugyanis nem illik egy gamer laptopba.

Összességében, az Acer Predator Helios 300 jó benyomást tett ránk. A ház stabil a vékony design ellenére, és a színválasztás a Predator-okhoz hasonlóan egyedivé teszi a megjelenését. A beviteli eszközök nagyon szimpatikusak voltak, és az Acer jó kijelzőt is választott.

A hangrendszer kissé kiábrándított, mivel az egy középkategóriás irodai gépbe illene, nem egy gamer notebookba. A kis szervizfedelek miatt a karbantartása is némileg kényelmetlen lehet. Egy nagyobb szervizfedél felhasználóbarátabb lenne.

Azok, akik az Acer Predator Helios 300-at választják, jó teljesítményt kapnak, jó áron.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Acer Predator Helios 300 - 08/16/2017 v6
Sebastian Bade

Váz
82 / 98 → 83%
Billentyűzet
83%
Érintőpad
83%
Csatlakoztathatóság
53 / 81 → 65%
Súly
57 / 10-66 → 84%
Akkumulátor
79%
Kijelző
86%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
94%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
95%
Hőmérséklet
79 / 95 → 83%
Zaj
77 / 90 → 85%
Audio
50%
Camera
47 / 85 → 56%
Átlag
74%
82%
Gaming - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Acer Predator Helios 300 (7700HQ, GTX 1060, full-HD) Laptop rövid értékelés
Sebastian Bade, 2017-08-23 (Update: 2017-08-23)