Notebookcheck

Nexoc G739 (Clevo N870HK1) Laptop rövid értékelés

Andreas Osthoff, Tanja Hinum (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 04/11/2017
Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Nagy, belépő szintű játékos. A Nexoc G739 egy 17.3 inches laptop erős Kaby Lake Core-i7 processzorral, és Pascal GPU GeForce GTX 1050 Ti videokártyával. A jó teljesítménynek viszont van árnyoldala is: magas hő- és zajkibocsátás.

Nexoc G739
Processzor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Grafikus adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop) - 4096 MB, Mag: 1493 MHz, Memória: 3500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 378.92, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, 2/2 hely foglalt, max. 32 GB
Kijelző
17.3 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, CMN1738, IPS, Full HD, fényes: nem
Alaplap
Intel HM175
Háttértár
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, m.2-SSD Typ 2280 PCIe 3.0 x4 + Seagate Mobile ST1000LM035, 1TB HDD @5400 rpm, 2.5 inch
Hangkártya
Realtek ALC269
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington zár, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm-es fejhallgató jack, 3.5 mm-es mikrofon jack , Kártyaolvasó: 6-in-1 (MMC, RSMMC, SD, Mini SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, TPM 2.0
Hálózat
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 27 x 419 x 289
Akkumulátor
62 Wh Lítium-Ion, 6 cellás
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webkamera: 2.0 MP
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: sztereo, Sound Blaster Cinema 3, Billentyűzet: chiclet, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, 120 wattos hálózati töltő, driver DVD, Control Center, MS Office (próbaverzió), 24 Hónap Garancia
Súly
2.865 kg, Tápegység: 464 g
Ár
1360 EUR
Hivatkozások
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

420 mm 288 mm 32 mm 3 kg416 mm 279 mm 33 mm 3.2 kg416 mm 274 mm 32 mm 2.9 kg419 mm 289 mm 27 mm 2.9 kg415 mm 280 mm 24 mm 2.7 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Nexoc G739
 
78 MB/s ∼100%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
 
76.3 MB/s ∼98% -2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
 
73 MB/s ∼94% -6%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
 
72.6 MB/s ∼93% -7%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
 
26 MB/s ∼33% -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Omen 17-w100ng
 
87 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Nexoc G739
 
87 MB/s ∼100%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
 
85.8 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
 
84.6 MB/s ∼97% -3%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
 
28 MB/s ∼32% -68%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
674 MBit/s ∼100% +52%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
666 MBit/s ∼99% +50%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
443 MBit/s ∼66%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
345 MBit/s ∼51% -22%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
543 MBit/s ∼100% +40%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
524 MBit/s ∼97% +35%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
388 MBit/s ∼71%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
294 MBit/s ∼54% -24%
277
cd/m²
324
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
CMN1738
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 324 cd/m² Átlag: 304.2 cd/m² Minimum: 27 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 85 %
Centrumban: 312 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1357:1 (Fekete: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.19 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 3.72 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Nexoc G739
CMN1738, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080, 17.3
HP Omen 17-w100ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GE72 7RE-046
N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
12%
17%
54%
17%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45 (20, 25)
33.2 (14.4, 18.8)
26%
35 (14, 21)
22%
27 (13, 14)
40%
38 (12, 26)
16%
Response Time Black / White *
28 (7, 21)
28.8 (7.6, 21.2)
-3%
25 (4, 21)
11%
9 (6, 3)
68%
23 (5, 18)
18%
PWM Frequency
450 (90)
Screen
-21%
-6%
-16%
-35%
Brightness middle
312
349
12%
342
10%
253
-19%
326
4%
Brightness
304
337
11%
331
9%
230
-24%
312
3%
Brightness Distribution
85
91
7%
84
-1%
86
1%
91
7%
Black Level *
0.23
0.58
-152%
0.32
-39%
0.24
-4%
0.5
-117%
Contrast
1357
602
-56%
1069
-21%
1054
-22%
652
-52%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.19
4.5
-7%
4.35
-4%
5.01
-20%
6.3
-50%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.7
10.2
-17%
9.24
-6%
10.4
-20%
11.69
-34%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.72
3.3
11%
3.73
-0%
7.26
-95%
7.37
-98%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.15 102%
2.23 99%
2.09 105%
2.37 93%
CCT
7104 91%
6103 107%
6801 96%
6329 103%
7116 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
55.7
-6%
57
-3%
76
29%
55
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
75.7
-17%
86
-5%
100
10%
83
-9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-5% / -16%
6% / -2%
19% / -5%
-9% / -27%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 450 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 450 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 450 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9370 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.82 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.15 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
69.37 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
161 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
743 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
105.81 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Segítség
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼100%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
145 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼83% -17%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
132 Points ∼82% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
743 Points ∼100%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
741 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼91% -9%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
464 Points ∼62% -38%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼100%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.72 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.65 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points ∼82% -18%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
1.49 Points ∼82% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points ∼100%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.1 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points ∼92% -8%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
5.32 Points ∼65% -35%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
5252 Points ∼100% 0%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5243 Points ∼100%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4809 Points ∼92% -8%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
4711 Points ∼100% +10%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4670 Points ∼99% +9%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4270 Points ∼91%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
4088 Points ∼87% -4%
PCMark 7 - Score
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6331 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
5990 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
5810 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4114 Points ∼65% -35%
PCMark 7 Score
6331 pontok
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4270 pontok
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5420 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5243 pontok
Segítség
Nexoc G739
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
HP Omen 17-w100ng
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-60%
-70%
-51%
-96%
Write 4k QD32
544.4
234.9
-57%
170.8
-69%
212.9
-61%
1.186
-100%
Read 4k QD32
635.7
247.6
-61%
141.6
-78%
372.5
-41%
1.106
-100%
Write 4k
154.5
76.8
-50%
76.14
-51%
112.9
-27%
1.146
-99%
Read 4k
60.74
24.7
-59%
20.25
-67%
22.7
-63%
0.602
-99%
Write 512
826.7
346.6
-58%
172.4
-79%
481.4
-42%
63.33
-92%
Read 512
856.5
336.1
-61%
315.5
-63%
455.1
-47%
44.85
-95%
Write Seq
1192
419.1
-65%
180.2
-85%
495.7
-58%
130.6
-89%
Read Seq
1666
475.7
-71%
495
-70%
539.6
-68%
134.6
-92%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Sequential Read: 1666 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1192 MB/s
512K Read: 856.5 MB/s
512K Write: 826.7 MB/s
4K Read: 60.74 MB/s
4K Write: 154.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 635.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 544.4 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14642 Points ∼100% +46%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14317 Points ∼98% +43%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
10186 Points ∼70% +2%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
10008 Points ∼68%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
7360 Points ∼50% -26%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11326 Points ∼100% +41%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11311 Points ∼100% +41%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
8086 Points ∼71% +1%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
8027 Points ∼71%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
5784 Points ∼51% -28%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
5421 Points ∼48% -32%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
79107 Points ∼100% +52%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
74982 Points ∼95% +44%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
51987 Points ∼66%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
49223 Points ∼62% -5%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
35884 Points ∼45% -31%
3DMark 11 Performance
9687 pontok
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22876 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6950 pontok
3DMark Time Spy Score
2519 pontok
Segítség
Battlefield 1
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
79 fps ∼100% +56%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
78.5 fps ∼99% +55%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
50.8 fps ∼64% 0%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
50.8 fps ∼64%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ
41.1 fps ∼52% -19%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
87.4 fps ∼100% +57%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
86.6 fps ∼99% +55%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
56.7 fps ∼65% +2%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
55.7 fps ∼64%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ
46.5 fps ∼53% -17%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
27.6 fps ∼100%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
26.9 fps ∼97% -3%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ
19.7 fps ∼71% -29%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
50.4 fps ∼100%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
48.7 fps ∼97% -3%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ
29.1 fps ∼58% -42%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
40.7 fps ∼100%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
39.7 fps ∼98% -2%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ
31.2 fps ∼77% -23%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
47.6 fps ∼100%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
47.4 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ
37.1 fps ∼78% -22%
For Honor
1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
46.1 fps ∼100%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
45.8 (min: 33, max: 64) fps ∼99% -1%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
62.9 (min: 51, max: 77) fps ∼100% +1%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
62.1 fps ∼99%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
99.1 fps ∼100% +37%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
98.9 fps ∼100% +36%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
72.5 fps ∼73%
alacsony közepes magas ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 72.5fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 89.850.427.6fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 84.247.640.7fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 79.255.750.8fps
For Honor (2017) 65.862.146.1fps

Zajszint

Üresjárat
31 / 32 / 38 dB(A)
HDD
31 dB(A)
Terhelés
44 / 50 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
csendes
40 dB(A)
hallható
50 dB(A)
hangos
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Noise
-0%
-6%
-1%
5%
off / environment *
30
28.8
4%
31
-3%
30
-0%
30.5
-2%
Idle Minimum *
31
33.9
-9%
35
-13%
34
-10%
31.4
-1%
Idle Average *
32
33.9
-6%
36
-13%
35
-9%
31.4
2%
Idle Maximum *
38
37.8
1%
37
3%
36
5%
31.5
17%
Load Average *
44
42.7
3%
44
-0%
41
7%
40.9
7%
Load Maximum *
50
47.4
5%
54
-8%
49
2%
46.2
8%

* ... smaller is better

Max. terhelés
 48.5 °C50.6 °C43.3 °C 
 48.7 °C50.1 °C44 °C 
 42.5 °C42.8 °C31.3 °C 
Maximum: 50.6 °C
Átlag: 44.6 °C
46.5 °C50 °C50.8 °C
45.8 °C48.9 °C40.9 °C
37 °C39.2 °C39.4 °C
Maximum: 50.8 °C
Átlag: 44.3 °C
Tápegység (max.)  51 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.6 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 42.2 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-14 °C / -25.2 F).
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Heat
19%
2%
0%
-8%
Maximum Upper Side *
50.6
37.7
25%
41.5
18%
45.8
9%
53.1
-5%
Maximum Bottom *
50.8
36.3
29%
45.5
10%
45.2
11%
44.9
12%
Idle Upper Side *
28.7
25.7
10%
31.8
-11%
31.7
-10%
32.9
-15%
Idle Bottom *
27.1
24.4
10%
29.6
-9%
29.9
-10%
33.4
-23%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.839.42531.632.43133.328.2403433.95034.132.16329.628.98032.831.710029.729.912527.6251602625.320024.227.425024.235.531521.647.740021.749.150021.450.963019.251.880018.157.8100018.266.8125018.16816001866.9200017.764.7250017.861.2315017.566.3400017.865.1500017.663.3630017.855800017.758.51000017.849.91250017.953.51600017.755.4SPL30.776N1.532.9median 18.1median 55Delta2.211.336.839.132.432.930.731.229.530.328.630.628.13126.932.425.132.624.231.323.347.122.557.521.661.720.859.819.95919.660.218.971.718.268.817.964.117.764.617.162.917.165.81767.51768.11768.517.371.41775.617.373.817.667.917.560.317.561.229.981.51.352.1median 17.7median 64.11.85.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNexoc G739Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Nexoc G739 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.6 / 1 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 7 / 14 / 23 Watt
Terhelés midlight 82 / 163 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Power Consumption
16%
-40%
-27%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
7
6.2
11%
17
-143%
14
-100%
15.6
-123%
Idle Average *
14
12.2
13%
22
-57%
20
-43%
20.2
-44%
Idle Maximum *
23
14.8
36%
29
-26%
25
-9%
21.4
7%
Load Average *
82
84.9
-4%
72
12%
82
-0%
90
-10%
Load Maximum *
163
120.7
26%
141
13%
135
17%
147
10%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
10h 13min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
4h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 22min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
2h 08min
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, 62 Wh
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ, 48 Wh
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, 95.8 Wh
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, 51.4 Wh
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, 76 Wh
Battery Runtime
-30%
6%
-38%
-27%
Reader / Idle
613
515
-16%
543
-11%
353
-42%
H.264
322
313
-3%
195
-39%
262
-19%
WiFi v1.3
288
261
-9%
363
26%
184
-36%
250
-13%
Load
128
45
-65%
145
13%
87
-32%

Pro

+ minden alkatrész hozzáférhető
+ kontrasztos FHD IPS kijelző
+ háttérvilágított billentyűzet
+ jó teljesítmény
+ stabil alsó rész

Kontra

- nagyobb terhelés esetén erősen melegedő ház
- 3D feladatoknál a ventilátor hangos
- alulméretezett táp
- gyenge hangszórók
- nincs Thunderbolt 3
Nexoc G739. Test device provided by Nexoc Germany.
Nexoc G739. Test device provided by Nexoc Germany.

Az erős hardvernek hála a Nexoc G739 életképes belépő szintű notebook. A videokártya és a Full HD kijelző jól összeillik, utóbbi elég világos, és egyéb tulajdonságai is jók. Más dolgokban, mint például csatlakozók, ház, és beviteli eszközök terén a készülék csak átlagosan teljesít.

Teljesítményét tekintve a Nexoc G739 nem mutat gyengeségeket, erőforrásigényes játékokkal is boldogul, de a Clevo-N870HK1 barebone-ok kibocsátási jellemzőin lenne mit javítani.

A hiányosságok között mindenképpen említést érdemel a hő- és zajkibocsátás. A házban lenne hely erősebb hűtésnek is, de mindkét kis ventilátor igen zajos, és a ház így is hamar felmelegszik. Csatlakozók terén (nincs Thunderbolt 3 ) ugyancsak lenne mit fejleszteni, és a kifejezetten játékra specializált funkciókat (G-Sync például) szintén hiába keressük.

Mindent egybevetve a Nexoc G739 nem egy rossz gaming notebook, de nem árt körülnézni a vetélytársak között is.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Nexoc G739 - 06/23/2018 v6(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Váz
76 / 98 → 78%
Billentyűzet
81%
Érintőpad
75%
Csatlakoztathatóság
60 / 81 → 74%
Súly
57 / 10-66 → 85%
Akkumulátor
81%
Kijelző
87%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
89%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
96%
Hőmérséklet
82 / 95 → 86%
Zaj
72 / 90 → 80%
Audio
45%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Átlag
73%
81%
Gaming - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Nexoc G739 (Clevo N870HK1) Laptop rövid értékelés
Andreas Osthoff, 2017-04-11 (Update: 2017-04-11)