Notebookcheck Logo

Xiaomi Redmi Pad rövid értékelés - Megfizethető Android táblagép 90 Hz-es képernyővel és 4 hangszóróval

Redmi debütálás. A Redmi Pad a Xiaomi első Redmi-sorozatú táblagépe. Ez azt sugallja, hogy a 10,6 hüvelykes készülék jó funkciókat kínál megfizethető áron. Miközben a Redmi Tab olyan tulajdonságokkal tündököl az értékelésünkben, mint a 90 Hz-es kijelző, a karcsú fémszerkezet és a hosszú üzemidő, felfedeztünk néhány gyengeséget is.
Android Tablet Touchscreen
jó (85%) Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99ARM Mali-G57 MP2 Tablet - 12/05/2022 - v7
Tesztkészülék a következő cég jóvoltából Xiaomi Germany
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Processzor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Grafikus adapter
Memória
4 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Kijelző
10.61 hüvelyk 5:3, 2000 x 1200 pixel 220 PPI, kapacitív, IPS, 400 Nits, fényes: igen, 90 Hz
Háttértár
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 105.1 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audió csatlakozók: USB-C, Kártyaolvasó: microSD slot kiadó eszköz, Fényerő érzékelő, Szenzorok: Gyorsulásmérő, DRM Widevine L1, Kamera2 API Teljes
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.3
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 7.05 x 250.38 x 157.98
Akkumulátor
8000 mAh Lítium-Ion, 18W gyorstöltés
Töltés
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operációs rendszer
Android 12
Camera
Elsődleges kamera: 8 MPix AF, videofelvétel [email protected]
Másodlagos kamera: 8 MPix FOV 105 °, videofelvétel [email protected]
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: 4 hangszóró Dolby Atmos-szal, Billentyűzet: virtual, 22.5W töltő (10V/2.25A), USB kábel, microSD slot kiadó eszköz, gyors kezelési útmutató, Garancia tájékoztató, MIUI 13, 24 Hónap Garancia, fanless
Súly
445 g, Tápegység: 65 g
Ár
330 Euró
Megjegyzés: A gyártó különböző beszállítóktól származó alkatrészeket használhat, beleértve a hasonló specifikációjú kijelzőpaneleket, meghajtókat vagy memóriastickeket.

 

Potential Competitors in Comparison

Értékelés
Dátum
Model
Súly
Magasság
Méret
Felbontás
Legjobb ár
84.6 %
12/2022
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
445 g7.05 mm10.61"2000x1200
88.5 %
10/2021
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
487 g7.5 mm10.20"2160x1620
80.9 %
10/2020
Huawei MatePad T10S
Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4
450 g7.85 mm10.10"1920x1200
81 %
01/2022
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
508 g6.9 mm10.50"1920x1200
80.5 %
Teclast T40 Pro
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
480 g9.2 mm10.36"2000x1200
87.6 %
10/2021
Xiaomi Pad 5
SD 860, Adreno 640
511 g6.85 mm11.00"2560x1600
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad

Size Comparison

254.69 mm 166.25 mm 6.85 mm 511 g250.6 mm 174.1 mm 7.5 mm 487 g250.38 mm 157.98 mm 7.05 mm 445 g248 mm 157 mm 9.2 mm 480 g246.8 mm 161.9 mm 6.9 mm 508 g240.2 mm 159 mm 7.85 mm 450 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
49.18 MB/s ∼100% +419%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
18.12 MB/s ∼37% +91%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
17.9 MB/s ∼36% +89%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
9.48 MB/s ∼19%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø35.8 (6.67-45.8)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40.5 (23.8-57.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.7 (13.3-40.3)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø34.1 (16.3-45.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø66.1 (7.54-78.5)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.1 (44.6-84.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (37.9-86.8)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78.1 (47.9-85.6)
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
635 (320min - 652max) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
587 (290min - 624max) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
538 (317min - 618max) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
485 (191min - 554max) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
367 (358min - 370max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
325 (163min - 328max) MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
322 (315min - 326max) MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
203 (158min - 227max) MBit/s ∼55% -45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
369 (179min - 379max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
349 (178min - 357max) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
346 (335min - 360max) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
239 (202min - 259max) MBit/s ∼65% -35%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (358-370)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (163-328)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (179-379)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø343 (178-357)
Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the main camera

Kép összehasonlítás

Válasszon egy jelenetet, és navigáljon az első képen belül. Érintőképernyőkön egy kattintással megváltoztathatja a pozíciót. Egy kattintás a kinagyított képre megnyitja az eredetit egy új ablakban. Az első képen a tesztkészülék méretarányos fotója látható.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1Tageslicht-Aufnahme 25-facher ZoomLowlight-Aufnahme
kattintson a képek betöltéséhez
ColorChecker
5.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Pad: 5.41 ∆E min: 3.07 - max: 8.64 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
54.9 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
64.9 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
47.5 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
76.6 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Pad: 47.37 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 93.7 ∆E
390
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 419 cd/m² (Nits) Átlag: 401.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.54 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 90 %
Centrumban: 418 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1493:1 (Fekete: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
96.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.61
Apple iPad 2021
IPS, 2160x1620, 10.20
Huawei MatePad T10S
LCD IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.50
Teclast T40 Pro
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.36
Xiaomi Pad 5
IPS, 2560x1600, 11.00
Screen
3%
-29%
-78%
-24%
-22%
Brightness middle
418
507
21%
285
-32%
368
-12%
433
4%
491
17%
Brightness
402
491
22%
282
-30%
346
-14%
412
2%
473
18%
Brightness Distribution
90
90
0%
91
1%
91
1%
86
-4%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.28
0.5
-79%
0.3
-7%
0.61
-118%
0.48
-71%
0.87
-211%
Contrast
1493
1014
-32%
950
-36%
603
-60%
902
-40%
564
-62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.3
1.7
26%
3.53
-53%
6.9
-200%
3
-30%
1.9
17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.4
3.9
28%
5.84
-8%
11.4
-111%
7.2
-33%
4.1
24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.7
2.4
35%
6.2
-68%
7.7
-108%
4.4
-19%
3
19%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.25 98%
2.044 108%
2.16 102%
2.12 104%
2.21 100%
CCT
6595 99%
6923 94%
8130 80%
8547 76%
7003 93%
7182 91%

* ... a kisebb jobb

Képernyő villogása / PWM (impulzusszélesség-moduláció)

A képernyő tompításához egyes notebookok egyszerűen be- és kikapcsolják a háttérvilágítást gyors egymásutánban - ez az úgynevezett impulzusszélesség-moduláció (PWM) módszer. Ennek a ciklikus frekvenciának ideális esetben az emberi szem számára nem észlelhetőnek kell lennie. Ha ez a frekvencia túl alacsony, az érzékeny szemű felhasználóknak megerőltető lehet, fejfájást okozhat, vagy akár észre is vehetik a villódzást.
Képernyő villogása / PWM nem érzékelhető

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19466 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Megjelenítési válaszidők

A kijelző válaszideje azt mutatja, hogy a képernyő milyen gyorsan képes egyik színről a másikra váltani. A lassú válaszidők utóképekhez vezethetnek, és a mozgó tárgyak elmosódottak lehetnek (szellemképek). A gyors tempójú 3D-s címek játékosainak különösen oda kell figyelniük a gyors válaszidőkre.
       Válaszidő Fekete-fehér
22.89 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva↗ 10.42 ms emelkedés
↘ 12.47 ms ősz
A képernyő jó reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, de túl lassú lehet a versenyképes játékosok számára.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő hasonló az összes vizsgált eszköz átlagához (22.7 ms).
       Válaszidő 50% szürke és 80% szürke között
38.13 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva↗ 17.15 ms emelkedés
↘ 20.98 ms ősz
A képernyő lassú reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, és nem lesz kielégítő a játékosok számára.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő hasonló az összes vizsgált eszköz átlagához (35.8 ms).
Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Apple iPad 2021
1328 Points ∼57% +138%
Xiaomi Pad 5
784 Points ∼34% +41%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (152 - 1892, n=44, az elmúlt 2 évben)
757 Points ∼33% +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
558 Points ∼24%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99 (540 - 576, n=4)
556 Points ∼24% 0%
Teclast T40 Pro
380 Points ∼16% -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
365 Points ∼16% -35%
Huawei MatePad T10S
296 Points ∼13% -47%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad 2021
3235 Points ∼11% +71%
Xiaomi Pad 5
2768 Points ∼10% +47%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (780 - 8524, n=44, az elmúlt 2 évben)
2726 Points ∼9% +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
1889 Points ∼7%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99 (1767 - 1924, n=4)
1848 Points ∼6% -2%
Teclast T40 Pro
1303 Points ∼5% -31%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1256 Points ∼4% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1229 Points ∼4% -35%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021
622382 Points ∼44% +97%
Xiaomi Pad 5
575553 Points ∼41% +82%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (117837 - 1416727, n=35, az elmúlt 2 évben)
529922 Points ∼37% +68%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99 (316212 - 337968, n=3)
329413 Points ∼23% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
316212 Points ∼22%
Teclast T40 Pro
240502 Points ∼17% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
201310 Points ∼14% -36%
Huawei MatePad T10S
182567 Points ∼13% -42%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Pad 5
11318 Points ∼59% +19%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99 (9475 - 10589, n=4)
9995 Points ∼52% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
9475 Points ∼49%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (4564 - 13996, n=35, az elmúlt 2 évben)
8426 Points ∼44% -11%
Teclast T40 Pro
8364 Points ∼44% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7447 Points ∼39% -21%
Huawei MatePad T10S
6622 Points ∼34% -30%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad 2021
842 Points ∼33% +46%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (335 - 1585, n=23, az elmúlt 2 évben)
796 Points ∼31% +38%
Xiaomi Pad 5
635 Points ∼25% +10%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99 (575 - 602, n=3)
593 Points ∼23% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
575 Points ∼22%
Teclast T40 Pro
384 Points ∼15% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
361 Points ∼14% -37%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 5
5154 Points ∼54% +72%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (444 - 6908, n=30, az elmúlt 2 évben)
3511 Points ∼37% +18%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99 (2988 - 3054, n=3)
3031 Points ∼32% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
2988 Points ∼31%
Teclast T40 Pro
2145 Points ∼22% -28%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2013 Points ∼21% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1839 Points ∼19% -38%
Apple iPad 2021
Points ∼0% -100%
System
Xiaomi Pad 5
8805 Points ∼45% +35%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99 (6484 - 6637, n=3)
6543 Points ∼33% +1%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (2793 - 10926, n=30, az elmúlt 2 évben)
6517 Points ∼33% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
6509 Points ∼33%
Teclast T40 Pro
4863 Points ∼25% -25%
Huawei MatePad T10S
4845 Points ∼25% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4729 Points ∼24% -27%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 5
5788 Points ∼50% +63%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (970 - 8167, n=30, az elmúlt 2 évben)
3985 Points ∼34% +12%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99 (3550 - 3982, n=3)
3778 Points ∼33% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
3550 Points ∼31%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2896 Points ∼25% -18%
Teclast T40 Pro
1608 Points ∼14% -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
970 Points ∼8% -73%
Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5
10293 Points ∼36% +258%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (928 - 22308, n=30, az elmúlt 2 évben)
6433 Points ∼22% +124%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
2875 Points ∼10%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99 (2730 - 2875, n=3)
2783 Points ∼10% -3%
Teclast T40 Pro
2063 Points ∼7% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2001 Points ∼7% -30%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1452 Points ∼5% -49%
Web
Xiaomi Pad 5
1346 Points ∼56% +12%
Teclast T40 Pro
1313 Points ∼55% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1246 Points ∼52% +4%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99 (1201 - 1250, n=3)
1228 Points ∼51% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
1201 Points ∼50%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (10 - 1598, n=30, az elmúlt 2 évben)
1190 Points ∼50% -1%
Huawei MatePad T10S
956 Points ∼40% -20%
AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi Pad 5
46413 Points ∼16% +939%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (4468 - 119686, n=23, az elmúlt 2 évben)
29074 Points ∼10% +551%
Teclast T40 Pro
4695 Points ∼2% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4659 Points ∼2% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
4468 Points ∼2%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99
4468 Points ∼2% 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
4455 Points ∼2% 0%
Apple iPad 2021
Points ∼0% -100%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (1535 - 73266, n=18, az elmúlt 2 évben)
10043 Points ∼12% +9%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99 (9213 - 9695, n=3)
9467 Points ∼11% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
9213 Points ∼11%
VRMark - Amber Room
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (676 - 8816, n=6, az elmúlt 2 évben)
3327 Score ∼34% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
2909 Score ∼30%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99
2909 Score ∼30% 0%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic, Apple A13 Bionic GPU, 64 GB SSD
 
Huawei MatePad T10S HiSilicon Kirin 710A, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Teclast T40 Pro UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Pad 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal: offscreen Overall Score
Basemark GPU 1.2: Vulkan Medium Native | 1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen | OpenGL Medium Native | 1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
1872 Points ∼100% +469%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
970 Points ∼52% +195%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
329 Points ∼18%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points ∼10% -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
179 Points ∼10% -46%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
152 Points ∼8% -54%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
1992 Points ∼100% +481%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
985 Points ∼49% +187%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
343 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
184 Points ∼9% -46%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
182 Points ∼9% -47%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
153 Points ∼8% -55%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
7858 Points ∼100% +547%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3436 Points ∼44% +183%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1215 Points ∼15%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
709 Points ∼9% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
708 Points ∼9% -42%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
564 Points ∼7% -54%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
7457 Points ∼100% +503%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3428 Points ∼46% +177%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1237 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
712 Points ∼10% -42%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
709 Points ∼10% -43%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
557 Points ∼7% -55%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8661 Points ∼100% +129%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3780 Points ∼44%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2158 Points ∼25% -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2105 Points ∼24% -44%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1501 Points ∼17% -60%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12007 Points ∼100% +215%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3809 Points ∼32%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2002 Points ∼17% -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1957 Points ∼16% -49%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1356 Points ∼11% -64%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4385 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3683 Points ∼84%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2969 Points ∼68% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2862 Points ∼65% -22%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2441 Points ∼56% -34%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6981 Points ∼100% +164%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
5362 Points ∼77% +103%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2644 Points ∼38%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1526 Points ∼22% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1463 Points ∼21% -45%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1124 Points ∼16% -57%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
9773 Points ∼100% +300%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8202 Points ∼84% +236%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2442 Points ∼25%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1338 Points ∼14% -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1284 Points ∼13% -47%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
981 Points ∼10% -60%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4590 Points ∼100% +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3717 Points ∼81%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3007 Points ∼66% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2865 Points ∼62% -23%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2365 Points ∼52% -36%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
2078 Points ∼45% -44%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5000 Points ∼100% +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2452 Points ∼49%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1518 Points ∼30% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1488 Points ∼30% -39%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1059 Points ∼21% -57%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6876 Points ∼100% +191%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2360 Points ∼34%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1361 Points ∼20% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1340 Points ∼19% -43%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
954 Points ∼14% -60%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2841 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2558 Points ∼90% -10%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2541 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2422 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
230 Points ∼8% -92%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2583 Points ∼100%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1456 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1425 Points ∼55% -45%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1085 Points ∼42% -58%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2412 Points ∼100%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1281 Points ∼53% -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1252 Points ∼52% -48%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
955 Points ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3439 Points ∼100%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2783 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2768 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2236 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3473 Points ∼100%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2140 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2084 Points ∼60% -40%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1445 Points ∼42% -58%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3482 Points ∼100%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1998 Points ∼57% -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1958 Points ∼56% -44%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1333 Points ∼38% -62%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3441 Points ∼100%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2850 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2692 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2256 Points ∼66% -34%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps ∼100% +104%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
60 fps ∼54% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
55 fps ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps ∼35% -29%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps ∼35% -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
38 fps ∼34% -31%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
307 fps ∼100% +387%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
184 fps ∼60% +192%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps ∼21%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps ∼13% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps ∼13% -35%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps ∼13% -35%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps ∼100% +86%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
60 fps ∼92% +71%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps ∼38% -29%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps ∼38% -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps ∼31% -43%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
167 fps ∼100% +318%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps ∼65% +173%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps ∼24%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps ∼17% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps ∼16% -35%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps ∼16% -35%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
57 fps ∼100% +148%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps ∼70% +74%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼26% -35%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼26% -35%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps ∼25% -39%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
110 fps ∼100% +340%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps ∼71% +212%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps ∼23%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps ∼15% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼14% -40%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼14% -40%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
43 fps ∼100% +231%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps ∼58% +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.2 fps ∼21% -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps ∼20% -35%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps ∼19% -38%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
69 fps ∼100% +360%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps ∼68% +213%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.7 fps ∼14% -35%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.1 fps ∼13% -39%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps ∼13% -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
35 fps ∼100% +317%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17 fps ∼49% +102%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.4 fps ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps ∼17% -29%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps ∼17% -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.8 fps ∼14% -43%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
31 fps ∼100% +474%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps ∼58% +233%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.6 fps ∼12% -33%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.6 fps ∼12% -33%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.9 fps ∼9% -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
50 fps ∼100% +317%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps ∼52% +117%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.9 fps ∼20% -17%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.9 fps ∼20% -17%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.6 fps ∼15% -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
82 fps ∼100% +486%
Xiaomi Pad 5
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps ∼57% +236%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps ∼12% -29%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps ∼12% -29%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.3 fps ∼5% -69%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal / Overall Score
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
2965 Points ∼100% +223%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
917 Points ∼31%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Native
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24.45 fps ∼100%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26.11 fps ∼100%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Native
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23.79 fps ∼100%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26.81 fps ∼100%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
142.2 Points ∼100% +155%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (17 - 225, n=40, az elmúlt 2 évben)
82.2 Points ∼58% +47%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
73 Points ∼51% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
55.842 Points ∼39%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 59.8, n=3)
54.2 Points ∼38% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
43.98 Points ∼31% -21%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
30.25 Points ∼21% -46%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
291.1 Points ∼100% +222%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (28.1 - 436, n=30, az elmúlt 2 évben)
156.9 Points ∼54% +74%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
128.1 Points ∼44% +42%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99
90.4 Points ∼31% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
90.377 Points ∼31%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
75.3 Points ∼26% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
66.5 Points ∼23% -26%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
48.12 Points ∼17% -47%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall Score
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (25 - 227, n=13, az elmúlt 2 évben)
85.4 Points ∼100% +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
56 Points ∼66%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 58, n=3)
51 Points ∼60% -9%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
202 Points ∼100% +140%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (33 - 342, n=40, az elmúlt 2 évben)
117.5 Points ∼58% +40%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
96 Points ∼48% +14%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99 (84 - 92, n=3)
88 Points ∼44% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
84 Points ∼42%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
76 Points ∼38% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
75 Points ∼37% -11%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
55 Points ∼27% -35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
171 runs/min ∼100% +349%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (13.9 - 376, n=38, az elmúlt 2 évben)
92.5 runs/min ∼54% +143%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
61.3 runs/min ∼36% +61%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
38.1 runs/min ∼22%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 40.7, n=3)
34.3 runs/min ∼20% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
33.35 runs/min ∼20% -12%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
25.64 runs/min ∼15% -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
47288 Points ∼100% +169%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
28456 Points ∼60% +62%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (5004 - 74614, n=42, az elmúlt 2 évben)
27899 Points ∼59% +59%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 21308, n=4)
18583 Points ∼39% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
17557 Points ∼37%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
14722 Points ∼31% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
10787 Points ∼23% -39%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
9996 Points ∼21% -43%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
4122 ms * ∼100% -69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
3060 ms * ∼74% -25%
Az osztály átlaga Tablet (451 - 12972, n=41, az elmúlt 2 évben)
2867 ms * ∼70% -17%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
2762 ms * ∼67% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
2443.7 ms * ∼59%
Átlagos Mediatek Helio G99 (2213 - 2444, n=3)
2295 ms * ∼56% +6%
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45)
1603 ms * ∼39% +34%
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
545 ms * ∼13% +78%

* ... a kisebb jobb

Xiaomi Redmi PadHuawei MatePad T10SSamsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022Teclast T40 ProXiaomi Pad 5Átlagos 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAz osztály átlaga Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-79%
-79%
-70%
-12%
-33%
-41%
Sequential Read 256KB
976.9
302.9
-69%
255.1
-74%
260.9
-73%
1459
49%
716 ?(303 - 999, n=38)
-27%
779 ?(151.1 - 2031, n=39, az elmúlt 2 évben)
-20%
Sequential Write 256KB
883.6
99
-89%
101.1
-89%
199.2
-77%
534
-40%
499 ?(105.3 - 884, n=38)
-44%
444 ?(66.7 - 1559, n=39, az elmúlt 2 évben)
-50%
Random Read 4KB
250.82
51.1
-80%
68.3
-73%
94.2
-62%
208.7
-17%
175.8 ?(89.3 - 253, n=38)
-30%
137 ?(10.1 - 310, n=39, az elmúlt 2 évben)
-45%
Random Write 4KB
257.02
57.8
-78%
57.5
-78%
83.6
-67%
158.9
-38%
175.4 ?(113.8 - 258, n=38)
-32%
131 ?(5.3 - 370, n=39, az elmúlt 2 évben)
-49%
Armajet
Armajet
Subway Surfers
Subway Surfers
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø58.4 (52-61)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad; PUBG Mobile; 2.3.0: Ø29.8 (27-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad; Subway Surfers; 3.4.0: Ø60.1 (50-61)

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

0510152025303540Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.45 (7.39-7.47)
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø39.5 (38.7-44.5)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.34 (3.33-3.35)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.26 (4.25-4.27)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø4.27 (4.26-4.29)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.5 (20.3-20.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.05 (2.03-2.07)
Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø10.7 (10.6-12.2)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø0.92 (0.907-0.927)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.096 (1.091-1.101)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø1.097 (1.093-1.102)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø5.86 (5.85-5.89)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø4.25 (4.24-4.25)
Max. terhelés
 29 °C28.7 °C27.4 °C 
 30.2 °C27.9 °C27.8 °C 
 30 °C27.9 °C27.4 °C 
Maximum: 30.2 °C
Átlag: 28.5 °C
27.4 °C28.1 °C28.5 °C
26.6 °C26.9 °C28.3 °C
26.3 °C27.3 °C27.7 °C
Maximum: 28.5 °C
Átlag: 27.5 °C
Tápegység (max.)  29.1 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.3 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.538.52526.323.53123.725.14035.925.5503637.16324.9248020.424.110018.53212516.941.116017.955.12001654.525014.159.231512.259.940013.360.150010.967.463012.371.780012.176.9100012.578.9125011.877.4160011.976.6200012.475.9250012.875.8315013.168.840001365.1500013.266630013.667.8800013.670.61000013.769.3125001466.31600013.853.8SPL2586N0.663.7median 13.2median 67.4Delta1.56.731.837.62422.816.123.727.625.232.337.623.430.22236.62239.52146.317.954.813.355.915.259.813.260.911.563.212.269.912.372.113.372.114.571.212.274.711.27211.770.212.168.512.767.213.672.313.17613.677.313.170.713.661.213.655.113.560.72584.40.663.1median 13.3median 68.51.27hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi PadXiaomi Pad 5
Frekvenciadiagram (a jelölőnégyzetek be- és kipipálhatók az eszközök összehasonlításához)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 0%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 0%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Pad 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 0%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 0%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.03 / 0.17 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.93 / 4.02 / 4.07 Watt
Terhelés midlight 5.52 / 6.89 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Jelenleg a mérésekhez a Metrahit Energy-t, egy professzionális egyfázisú áramminőség- és energiamérő digitális multimétert használjuk. Tudjon meg többet róla here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
8000 mAh
Apple iPad 2021
8686 mAh
Huawei MatePad T10S
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7040 mAh
Teclast T40 Pro
7000 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 5
8720 mAh
Power Consumption
-71%
-28%
-25%
-21%
-22%
Idle Minimum *
0.93
1.3
-40%
1.6
-72%
1.19
-28%
1.44
-55%
0.99
-6%
Idle Average *
4.02
7.5
-87%
2.8
30%
4.63
-15%
3.87
4%
4.2
-4%
Idle Maximum *
4.07
7.58
-86%
3.5
14%
4.68
-15%
3.91
4%
4.22
-4%
Load Average *
5.52
10.03
-82%
7.9
-43%
7.27
-32%
7.1
-29%
7.88
-43%
Load Maximum *
6.89
10.91
-58%
11.5
-67%
9.17
-33%
8.88
-29%
10.63
-54%

* ... a kisebb jobb

Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)