Vaio SX14 (i5-8265U, FHD) Laptop rövid értékelés
A visszatérés. A Vaio visszatért! Néhány év elteltével, ami alatt a volt Sony PC vállalat szinte kizárólag a japán piacon tevékenykedett, a jól ismert PC márka visszatér a nyugati piacokra. Az új Vaio SX14 üzleti és irodai felhasználókat próbál meggyőzni a könnyű, szinte keretmentes dizájnnal és nagy portválasztékkal.
Size & weight comparison
» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
| VAIO SX14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (30.9 - 950, n=121) | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
| VAIO SX14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (36 - 949, n=121) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fényerő megoszlás: 86 %
Kontraszt: 1108:1 (Fekete: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.05 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 6.25 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
95% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
| VAIO SX14 HV140FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 14 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK Lenovo LEN40A9 / AUO B140HAK02.3, , 1920x1080, 14 | Dell Latitude 7390 LGD059B, , 1920x1080, 13.3 | Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T AU Optronics AUO353D / B140HAN03.5, , 1920x1080, 14 | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Sharp LQ133M1JW28, , 1920x1080, 13.3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 17% | 13% | -2% | -25% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43 (22, 21) | 40 (18, 22) 7% | 36.8 (18, 18.8) 14% | 48.8 (18, 30.8) -13% | 43 (21, 22) -0% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 34 (19, 15) | 25 (14, 11) 26% | 30.4 (18.8, 11.6) 11% | 30.8 (8, 22.8) 9% | 29 (16, 13) 15% |
| PWM Frequency | 2000 (90) | 217 (20) -89% | |||
| Screen | 25% | 10% | -15% | 14% | |
| Brightness middle | 277 | 298 8% | 303.8 10% | 319 15% | 344 24% |
| Brightness | 262 | 287 10% | 289 10% | 294 12% | 320 22% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 86 0% | 87 1% | 77 -10% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.2 20% | 0.31 -24% | 0.26 -4% | 0.31 -24% |
| Contrast | 1108 | 1490 34% | 980 -12% | 1227 11% | 1110 0% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 5.05 | 2.19 57% | 2.9 43% | 7.1 -41% | 2.72 46% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 8.63 | 4.39 49% | 5.79 33% | 13.7 -59% | 5.92 31% |
| Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 6.25 | 1.97 68% | 3.7 41% | 9.61 -54% | 2.74 56% |
| Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.43 91% | 2.118 104% | 2.33 94% | 2.38 92% |
| CCT | 7227 90% | 6571 99% | 6323 103% | 6021 108% | 6794 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62 | 62 0% | 63 2% | 54.01 -13% | 61 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95 | 95 0% | 95 0% | 83.02 -13% | 94 -1% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 1.67 | 1.72 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 21% /
24% | 12% /
11% | -9% /
-12% | -6% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2000 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9352 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| VAIO SX14 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (111 - 164, n=27) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (20 - 185, n=272) | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| VAIO SX14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (457 - 750, n=29) | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (32 - 757, n=282) | |
| Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
| PCMark 10 | |
| Digital Content Creation | |
| VAIO SX14 | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2067 - 3210, n=22) | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (534 - 3704, n=87) | |
| Productivity | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| VAIO SX14 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2941 - 6556, n=22) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1014 - 7281, n=87) | |
| Essentials | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| VAIO SX14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (5073 - 8689, n=22) | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2062 - 9402, n=87) | |
| Score | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| VAIO SX14 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2247 - 3985, n=22) | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (743 - 4344, n=90) | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| VAIO SX14 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3132 - 4927, n=19) | |
| Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1283 - 5363, n=212) | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
| VAIO SX14 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2747 - 4244, n=20) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1027 - 4211, n=240) | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3496 pontok | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4919 pontok | |
Segítség | ||
| VAIO SX14 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 7390 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 14% | 8% | -52% | 0% | |
| Write 4K | 101.8 | 131.86 30% | 139.4 37% | 80.49 -21% | 110 (50.2 - 137, n=21) 8% |
| Read 4K | 37.63 | 44.6 19% | 43.18 15% | 26.14 -31% | 41 (31.4 - 63.7, n=21) 9% |
| Write Seq | 1384 | 1824.25 32% | 1075 -22% | 396.8 -71% | 1390 (991 - 1687, n=20) 0% |
| Read Seq | 2061 | 2162.98 5% | 1639 -20% | 473.1 -77% | 1570 (755 - 2134, n=20) -24% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 489.3 | 338.15 -31% | 662 35% | 264.2 -46% | 356 (205 - 568, n=21) -27% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 281.2 | 351.85 25% | 413.9 47% | 244 -13% | 389 (229 - 645, n=21) 38% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1515 | 1972.1 30% | 1195 -21% | 464.6 -69% | 1500 (1380 - 1712, n=21) -1% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3324 | 3387.2 2% | 3116 -6% | 525.2 -84% | 3293 (1529 - 3522, n=21) -1% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| VAIO SX14 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1235 - 2006, n=169) | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (230 - 4905, n=360) | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| VAIO SX14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 1401, n=137) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (222 - 3726, n=241) | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| VAIO SX14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6910 - 11436, n=155) | |
| Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1484 - 22615, n=269) | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2114 pontok | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9208 pontok | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1176 pontok | |
Segítség | ||
| alacsony | közepes | magas | ultra | ||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 78.7 | 39.7 | 33.5 | 10.2 | fps |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 17.4 | fps | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 24.5 | 14.9 | fps |
Zajszint
| Üresjárat |
| 32.5 / 32.5 / 32.5 dB(A) |
| Terhelés |
| 43.3 / 43.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB csendes 40 dB(A) hallható 50 dB(A) hangos |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.1 °C / 104 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.1 °C / 82.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.6 °C / 83.5 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
VAIO SX14 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
| Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | 0.28 / 0.4 Watt |
| Üresjárat | 4.4 / 7.9 / 8 Watt |
| Terhelés |
38 / 44.9 Watt |
   
| |
Kulcs:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| VAIO SX14 8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 14 | Dell Latitude 7390 8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3 | Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T 7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN), IPS, 1920x1080, 14 | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -18% | 11% | 20% | 29% | 3% | -22% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.4 | 3.8 14% | 3.3 25% | 3.1 30% | 2.4 45% | 3.86 (1 - 12.4, n=176) 12% | 6.65 (1 - 36, n=597) -51% |
| Idle Average * | 7.9 | 8.9 -13% | 5.9 25% | 6.1 23% | 5.5 30% | 7.1 (4.3 - 15.5, n=176) 10% | 9.86 (2.06 - 39, n=597) -25% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8 | 11.9 -49% | 6.2 22% | 6.8 15% | 6 25% | 8.93 (5.2 - 16.6, n=176) -12% | 12.2 (3.9 - 55, n=597) -53% |
| Load Average * | 38 | 47.5 -25% | 43.2 -14% | 27.4 28% | 31 18% | 35.3 (8.1 - 51.6, n=176) 7% | 33.6 (6.3 - 75, n=587) 12% |
| Load Maximum * | 44.9 | 52.5 -17% | 45.2 -1% | 43.7 3% | 32.6 27% | 44.8 (22 - 79, n=176) -0% | 40.7 (7.6 - 111, n=590) 9% |
* ... smaller is better
| VAIO SX14 8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Dell Latitude 7390 8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T 7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 57% | 96% | 59% | 45% | 23% | |
| Reader / Idle | 605 | 1328 120% | 1137 88% | 1167 93% | 620 (87 - 2557, n=549) 2% | |
| H.264 | 390 | 566 45% | 433 11% | 475 (182 - 1174, n=114) 22% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 339 | 519 53% | 664 96% | 531 57% | 506 49% | 473 (206 - 806, n=214) 40% |
| Load | 96 | 106 10% | 126 31% | 123 28% | 122 (40 - 347, n=557) 27% |
Pro
Kontra
A Vaio SX14 elvileg a márka nagy visszatérése a nyugati piacra. Vajon sikertörténet ez a visszatérés? Bizonyos szempontból igen, de sajnos a Vaio két meglehetősen nagy hibát követett el.
Először a modern Sony Vaio utód pozitívumaira összpontosítsunk. Nagyon tetszik a rendkívül könnyű váz, amely a könnyűsége ellenére bizonyos mértékben stabil is. Szeretjük a kényelmes billentyűzetet is. A matt képernyű nem túl élénk, de elég nagy az sRGB színskála lefedettsége ahhoz, hogy lehetővé tegye a képszerkesztést. A port választék bőséges. Különösen a VGA port az, amelyet manapság nem találunk meg más notebookokon. Az is dícséretes, hogy minden modell (legalábbis itt, Németországban) rendelkezik LTE-vel - ez nem minden versenytárs esetében van így. Végül, de nem utolsósorban, a Vaio SX14 jó CPU teljesítményt nyújt, és hűvös marad kívül, még terhelés alatt is.
Egy ultrakönnyű notebook mobil internettel és sok porttal - ez úgy hangzik, mint egy fantasztikus mobil munkagép, de mit ér a kitűnő menet közbeni kapcsolat, ha az üzemidő gyenge? A belső akkumulátor sajnos nagyon kicsi, és még 5 órát sem képes működtetni a Vaio SX14-et a WiFi tesztben. Úgy tűnik, mintha a Vaio túl nagy hangsúlyt fektetett volna az alacsony súlyra, szándékosan kisebb akkut használva, hogy csökkentse a súlyt. Ez gyakorlatilag azt jelenti, hogy a Vaio menet közben hosszabb ideig használhatatlan egy hordozható töltő nélkül. A második nagy negatívum a ventilátor vezérlés: Rendkívül idegesítőnek találjuk, hogy a ventilátor állandóan működik, nem számít, hogy üresjáraton vagy terhelés alatt van. Ez egyszerűen felesleges. Mindezen problémákat szem előtt tartva, a Vaio SX14 további hátrányai, mint a Thunderbolt 3 port hiánya, a kis méretű érintőpad, a rossz hangszórók, az ISO billentyűzet választásának hiánya és a magas ár már csak szőrszálhasogatásnak tűnik.
Gyenge üzemidő és egy idegesítő ventilátor sakk-matt helyzetet eredményez a Vaio SX14-el szemben - a tagadhatatlan pozitívumai ellenére.
Tényleg ajánlani szeretnénk a Vaio SX14-et. A kompakt, könnyű dizájn nagyon vonzó. Sajnos csak nem tudjuk megtenni, a rossz üzemidő és az idegesítő ventilátor vezérlés miatt. Nagy kár, mert ebben a gépben sok potenciál van. A Vaio-nak csak újra kéne dolgoznia a ventilátor vezérlést és betennie egy nagyobb akkut a következő verzióba - még akkor is, ha ez valamivel nagyobb súlyt eredményez.
VAIO SX14 - 04/30/2019 v6(old)
Benjamin Herzig