Notebookcheck

Vaio SX14 (i5-8265U, FHD) Laptop rövid értékelés

Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (fordította Zoltán Kiss), 05/30/2019
Windows Whiskey Lake Laptop / Notebook Business Ultrabook

A visszatérés. A Vaio visszatért! Néhány év elteltével, ami alatt a volt Sony PC vállalat szinte kizárólag a japán piacon tevékenykedett, a jól ismert PC márka visszatér a nyugati piacokra. Az új Vaio SX14 üzleti és irodai felhasználókat próbál meggyőzni a könnyű, szinte keretmentes dizájnnal és nagy portválasztékkal.

VAIO SX14
Processzor
Intel Core i5-8265U
Grafikus adapter
Memória
8192 MB 
, LPDDR3-2133, forrasztott
Kijelző
14 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, HV140FHM-N61, IPS LED, fényes: nem
Alaplap
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Háttértár
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, 256 GB 
, M.2 2280, PCIe NVMe
Hangkártya
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Csatlakozók
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington zár, Audió csatlakozók: Kombinált audió, Kártyaolvasó: SD kártyaolvasó, Touch-FP-Leser Ujjlenyomat olvasó
Hálózat
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1, Telit LM940, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 17.9 x 320.4 x 222.7
Akkumulátor
38 Wh Lítium-Polimer
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webkamera: 0.92 megapixel
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: sztereó, Billentyűzet: 6 row Chiclet, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, Vaio Control Center, Vaio Clipping Tool, Microsoft Office Próbaverzió, 24 Hónap Garancia
Súly
1.008 kg, Tápegység: 286 g
Ár
2000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size & weight comparison

323.5 mm 217.1 mm 15.95 mm 1.1 kg320.4 mm 222.7 mm 17.9 mm 1 kg321 mm 216 mm 15 mm 1.1 kg309 mm 212.5 mm 15.5 mm 920 g305 mm 208 mm 16.5 mm 1.3 kg
right: SD card-reader, USB 3.1 Gen 2 type A, USB 3.1 Gen 2 type C, HDMI, RJ45, VGA
right: SD card-reader, USB 3.1 Gen 2 type A, USB 3.1 Gen 2 type C, HDMI, RJ45, VGA
left: charging port, Kensington lock slot, 2x USB 3.0 type A, combo audio
left: charging port, Kensington lock slot, 2x USB 3.0 type A, combo audio
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
633 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
578 MBit/s ∼91% +5%
VAIO SX14
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
550 (min: 434, max: 580) MBit/s ∼87%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (30.9 - 950, n=115)
532 MBit/s ∼84% -3%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
525 MBit/s ∼83% -5%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
667 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
VAIO SX14
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
610 (min: 575, max: 631) MBit/s ∼91%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (36 - 949, n=115)
525 MBit/s ∼79% -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
511 MBit/s ∼77% -16%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
463 MBit/s ∼69% -24%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640Tooltip
VAIO SX14 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø549 (434-580)
VAIO SX14 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø610 (575-631)
250
cd/m²
251
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
HV140FHM-N61
5.6
Maximum: 285 cd/m² Átlag: 261.9 cd/m² Minimum: 281 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 86 %
Kontraszt: 1108:1 (Fekete: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.05 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 6.25 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
95% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
VAIO SX14
HV140FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Lenovo LEN40A9 / AUO B140HAK02.3, , 1920x1080, 14
Dell Latitude 7390
LGD059B, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
AU Optronics AUO353D / B140HAN03.5, , 1920x1080, 14
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Sharp LQ133M1JW28, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
17%
13%
-2%
-25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43 (22, 21)
40 (18, 22)
7%
36.8 (18, 18.8)
14%
48.8 (18, 30.8)
-13%
43 (21, 22)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
34 (19, 15)
25 (14, 11)
26%
30.4 (18.8, 11.6)
11%
30.8 (8, 22.8)
9%
29 (16, 13)
15%
PWM Frequency
2000 (90)
217 (20)
-89%
Screen
25%
10%
-15%
14%
Brightness middle
277
298
8%
303.8
10%
319
15%
344
24%
Brightness
262
287
10%
289
10%
294
12%
320
22%
Brightness Distribution
86
91
6%
86
0%
87
1%
77
-10%
Black Level *
0.25
0.2
20%
0.31
-24%
0.26
-4%
0.31
-24%
Contrast
1108
1490
34%
980
-12%
1227
11%
1110
0%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.05
2.19
57%
2.9
43%
7.1
-41%
2.72
46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.63
4.39
49%
5.79
33%
13.7
-59%
5.92
31%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.25
1.97
68%
3.7
41%
9.61
-54%
2.74
56%
Gamma
2.43 91%
2.43 91%
2.118 104%
2.33 94%
2.38 92%
CCT
7227 90%
6571 99%
6323 103%
6021 108%
6794 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62
62
0%
63
2%
54.01
-13%
61
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
95
95
0%
95
0%
83.02
-13%
94
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.67
1.72
Total Average (Program / Settings)
21% / 24%
12% / 11%
-9% / -12%
-6% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (40 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2000 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9428 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

HWiNFO
HWiNFO
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
 
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
VAIO SX14 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø577 (571-626)
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø504 (501.01-528.9)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U; undervolted: Ø657 (651.36-692.5)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø606 (601.59-638.02)
Dell Latitude 7390 Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U: Ø611 (578.18-626.37)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i7-8650U
176 Points ∼100% +8%
VAIO SX14
Intel Core i5-8265U
163 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U
  (111 - 163, n=22)
154 Points ∼88% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Core i5-8350U
150 Points ∼85% -8%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼82% -12%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
Intel Core i5-7200U
127 Points ∼72% -22%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20 - 184, n=264)
115 Points ∼65% -29%
CPU Multi 64Bit
VAIO SX14
Intel Core i5-8265U
640 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Core i5-8350U
631 Points ∼99% -1%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i7-8650U
619 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U
  (483 - 750, n=24)
603 Points ∼94% -6%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel Core i5-8250U
529 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (32 - 721, n=274)
333 Points ∼52% -48%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
Intel Core i5-7200U
321 Points ∼50% -50%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
52.45 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
640 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
163 Points
Segítség
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
VAIO SX14
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
3126 Points ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3068 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3062 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2620 - 3210, n=18)
2977 Points ∼95% -5%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
2711 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (534 - 3704, n=80)
2417 Points ∼77% -23%
Productivity
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7142 Points ∼100% +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6727 Points ∼94% +8%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5836 - 6556, n=18)
6220 Points ∼87% 0%
VAIO SX14
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6215 Points ∼87%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
6079 Points ∼85% -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1014 - 7281, n=80)
5197 Points ∼73% -16%
Essentials
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
8253 Points ∼100% +4%
VAIO SX14
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7949 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (7278 - 8689, n=18)
7903 Points ∼96% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7849 Points ∼95% -1%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
7149 Points ∼87% -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2062 - 8549, n=80)
6728 Points ∼82% -15%
Score
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4053 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3905 Points ∼96% +2%
VAIO SX14
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
3846 Points ∼95%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3573 - 3985, n=18)
3775 Points ∼93% -2%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3514 Points ∼87% -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (743 - 4344, n=83)
3111 Points ∼77% -19%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5197 Points ∼100% +6%
VAIO SX14
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4919 Points ∼95%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
4747 Points ∼91% -3%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4302 - 4927, n=16)
4743 Points ∼91% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4664 Points ∼90% -5%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
4630 Points ∼89% -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1283 - 5363, n=205)
4032 Points ∼78% -18%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3886 Points ∼100% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3752 Points ∼97% +7%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
3714 Points ∼96% +6%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3676 Points ∼95% +5%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3150 - 4244, n=17)
3517 Points ∼91% +1%
VAIO SX14
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
3496 Points ∼90%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1027 - 4182, n=233)
3028 Points ∼78% -13%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3496 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4919 pontok
Segítség
VAIO SX14
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Dell Latitude 7390
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
14%
8%
-52%
-1%
Write 4K
101.8
131.86
30%
139.4
37%
80.49
-21%
107 (50.2 - 137, n=19)
5%
Read 4K
37.63
44.6
19%
43.18
15%
26.14
-31%
40.9 (31.4 - 63.7, n=19)
9%
Write Seq
1384
1824.25
32%
1075
-22%
396.8
-71%
1385 (991 - 1687, n=18)
0%
Read Seq
2061
2162.98
5%
1639
-20%
473.1
-77%
1543 (755 - 2089, n=18)
-25%
Write 4K Q32T1
489.3
338.15
-31%
662
35%
264.2
-46%
354 (205 - 568, n=19)
-28%
Read 4K Q32T1
281.2
351.85
25%
413.9
47%
244
-13%
382 (229 - 645, n=19)
36%
Write Seq Q32T1
1515
1972.1
30%
1195
-21%
464.6
-69%
1508 (1380 - 1712, n=19)
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3324
3387.2
2%
3116
-6%
525.2
-84%
3284 (1529 - 3516, n=19)
-1%
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Sequential Read: 2410 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1392 MB/s
512K Read: 1624 MB/s
512K Write: 1429 MB/s
4K Read: 59.67 MB/s
4K Write: 132.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 421.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 672.7 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1901 Points ∼100% +1%
VAIO SX14
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1880 Points ∼99%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 3743, n=155)
1719 Points ∼90% -9%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
1697 Points ∼89% -10%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1657 Points ∼87% -12%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1557 Points ∼82% -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (230 - 4905, n=353)
1260 Points ∼66% -33%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
VAIO SX14
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1294 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1283 Points ∼99% -1%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1169 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1401, n=124)
1119 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (222 - 3726, n=233)
1036 Points ∼80% -20%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
977 Points ∼76% -24%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
975 Points ∼75% -25%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
VAIO SX14
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
10724 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
10123 Points ∼94% -6%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9291 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11436, n=142)
9118 Points ∼85% -15%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
8433 Points ∼79% -21%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
8247 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1484 - 22615, n=261)
7544 Points ∼70% -30%
3DMark 11 Performance
2114 pontok
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
9208 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1176 pontok
Segítség
alacsony közepes magas ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 78.739.733.510.2fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 17.4fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 24.514.9fps

Zajszint

Üresjárat
32.5 / 32.5 / 32.5 dB(A)
Terhelés
43.3 / 43.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
csendes
40 dB(A)
hallható
50 dB(A)
hangos
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.340.532.632.433.32532.238.131.530.432.23134.539.135.53034.54034.632.834.131.134.65030.830.630.329.530.86328.629.829.62928.68028.12727.426.828.110026.127.125.126.726.112525.227.525.924.825.216024.824.724.524.224.82002424.823.723.92425022.723.622.622.522.731523.423.622.121.723.440024.725.321.320.924.750025.225.921.519.825.263029.729.421.719.629.780029.530.520.818.629.5100030.531.12118.530.5125030.330.720.617.930.3160032.432.921.417.732.4200032.232.820.917.532.2250033.233.819.717.533.2315031.63219.217.731.6400034.635.119.417.834.6500034.235.218.717.934.2630027.228.118.71827.2800022.82318.718.322.81000021.620.418.818.221.61250019.219.118.818.219.21600018.918.918.918.318.9SPL43.343.932.330.543.3N3.94.11.61.33.9median 26.1median 27.5median 20.9median 18.3median 26.1Delta3.641.62.13.633.333.232.233.733.33636.935.334.1363937.737.935.73937.132.134.930.537.132.734.134.537.632.731.327.929.328.731.329.926.926.826.229.926.626.3262626.628.425.726.326.728.42523.924.524.8252323.523.723.62322.722.82323.222.722.521.721.522.622.522.122.722.122.722.121.120.620.32021.120.720.719.419.320.720.520.418.818.720.520.819.918.318.120.820.52018.31820.522.521.51817.922.522.821.918.11822.823.1221817.923.122.822.118.218.222.822.12118.418.522.121.12018.718.621.120.219.718.818.720.219.719.61918.919.719.519.419.11919.519.319.419.219.119.319.519.519.519.419.533.833313133.81.81.71.41.41.8median 22.1median 21median 19.1median 19median 22.11.21.11.71.91.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseVAIO SX14Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Max. terhelés
 35.9 °C35.4 °C31.6 °C 
 35.4 °C38.7 °C31.7 °C 
 27.6 °C27.9 °C28.1 °C 
Maximum: 38.7 °C
Átlag: 32.5 °C
32 °C37 °C41 °C
29.7 °C42 °C29.1 °C
27.6 °C28.4 °C24.7 °C
Maximum: 42 °C
Átlag: 32.4 °C
Tápegység (max.)  50.2 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 24.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.1 °C / 104 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.1 °C / 82.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.6 °C / 83.5 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.832.434.82531.830.431.83136.53036.54033.131.133.15031.429.531.46329.82929.88027.426.827.410027.426.727.412525.724.825.716025.524.225.520024.723.924.725026.922.526.931533.821.733.840040.720.940.750050.419.850.463056.519.656.580064.718.664.7100067.918.567.912506617.966160065.117.765.1200064.117.564.1250065.717.565.7315063.817.763.8400065.417.865.4500061.717.961.7630058.61858.6800062.718.362.71000062.618.262.61250059.318.259.31600051.618.351.6SPL7630.576N32.61.332.6median 59.3median 18.3median 59.3Delta12.72.112.734.83330.328.135.438.130.332.226.631.825.827.624.725.123.926.524.833.424.141.923.94821.85120.155.318.261.117.366.61770.316.578.416.57515.868.915.770.615.467.615.569.21672.916.268.616.7701771.217.272.217.470.917.365.817.256.228.983.61.258.7median 17.2median 68.61.88.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVAIO SX14Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
VAIO SX14 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.28 / 0.4 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 4.4 / 7.9 / 8 Watt
Terhelés midlight 38 / 44.9 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
VAIO SX14
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 14
Dell Latitude 7390
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN), IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
-18%
11%
20%
29%
4%
-22%
Idle Minimum *
4.4
3.8
14%
3.3
25%
3.1
30%
2.4
45%
3.89 (1 - 12.4, n=163)
12%
6.67 (1 - 36, n=592)
-52%
Idle Average *
7.9
8.9
-13%
5.9
25%
6.1
23%
5.5
30%
7.14 (4.3 - 15.5, n=163)
10%
9.88 (2.06 - 39, n=592)
-25%
Idle Maximum *
8
11.9
-49%
6.2
22%
6.8
15%
6
25%
9 (5.2 - 16.6, n=163)
-13%
12.2 (3.9 - 55, n=592)
-53%
Load Average *
38
47.5
-25%
43.2
-14%
27.4
28%
31
18%
35.4 (12.9 - 51.6, n=163)
7%
33.5 (6.3 - 75, n=582)
12%
Load Maximum *
44.9
52.5
-17%
45.2
-1%
43.7
3%
32.6
27%
43.8 (22 - 79, n=163)
2%
40.5 (7.6 - 111, n=585)
10%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
10h 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
5h 39min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 30min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
1h 36min
VAIO SX14
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Dell Latitude 7390
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
57%
96%
59%
45%
21%
Reader / Idle
605
1328
120%
1137
88%
1167
93%
616 (87 - 2557, n=547)
2%
H.264
390
566
45%
433
11%
463 (182 - 950, n=110)
19%
WiFi v1.3
339
519
53%
664
96%
531
57%
506
49%
466 (206 - 805, n=206)
37%
Load
96
106
10%
126
31%
123
28%
121 (40 - 347, n=554)
26%

Pro

+ könnyű és stabil váz
+ kényelmes billentyűzet
+ képernyő jó színskála lefedettséggel
+ bőséges portválaszték (VGA, RJ45, SD kártyaolvasó)
+ LTE alap minden modellben Németországban
+ jó CPU teljesítmény
+ a váz terhelés alatt nem melegszik fel

Kontra

- rossz üzemidő
- bosszantó ventilátorvezérlés
- a Thunderbolt 3 hiányzik
- az érintőpad túl kicsi
- rossz hangszórók
- nincs ISO billentyűzet
- magas ár
Vaio SX14 rövid értékelés
Vaio SX14 rövid értékelés

A Vaio SX14 elvileg a márka nagy visszatérése a nyugati piacra. Vajon sikertörténet ez a visszatérés? Bizonyos szempontból igen, de sajnos a Vaio két meglehetősen nagy hibát követett el.

Először a modern Sony Vaio utód pozitívumaira összpontosítsunk. Nagyon tetszik a rendkívül könnyű váz, amely a könnyűsége ellenére bizonyos mértékben stabil is. Szeretjük a kényelmes billentyűzetet is. A matt képernyű nem túl élénk, de elég nagy az sRGB színskála lefedettsége ahhoz, hogy lehetővé tegye a képszerkesztést. A port választék bőséges. Különösen a VGA port az, amelyet manapság nem találunk meg más notebookokon. Az is dícséretes, hogy minden modell (legalábbis itt, Németországban) rendelkezik LTE-vel - ez nem minden versenytárs esetében van így. Végül, de nem utolsósorban, a Vaio SX14 jó CPU teljesítményt nyújt, és hűvös marad kívül, még terhelés alatt is.

Egy ultrakönnyű notebook mobil internettel és sok porttal - ez úgy hangzik, mint egy fantasztikus mobil munkagép, de mit ér a kitűnő menet közbeni kapcsolat, ha az üzemidő gyenge? A belső akkumulátor sajnos nagyon kicsi, és még 5 órát sem képes működtetni a Vaio SX14-et a WiFi tesztben. Úgy tűnik, mintha a Vaio túl nagy hangsúlyt fektetett volna az alacsony súlyra, szándékosan kisebb akkut használva, hogy csökkentse a súlyt. Ez gyakorlatilag azt jelenti, hogy a Vaio menet közben hosszabb ideig használhatatlan egy hordozható töltő nélkül. A második nagy negatívum a ventilátor vezérlés: Rendkívül idegesítőnek találjuk, hogy a ventilátor állandóan működik, nem számít, hogy üresjáraton vagy terhelés alatt van. Ez egyszerűen felesleges. Mindezen problémákat szem előtt tartva, a Vaio SX14 további hátrányai, mint a Thunderbolt 3 port hiánya, a kis méretű érintőpad, a rossz hangszórók, az ISO billentyűzet választásának hiánya és a magas ár már csak szőrszálhasogatásnak tűnik.

Gyenge üzemidő és egy idegesítő ventilátor sakk-matt helyzetet eredményez a Vaio SX14-el szemben - a tagadhatatlan pozitívumai ellenére.

Tényleg ajánlani szeretnénk a Vaio SX14-et. A kompakt, könnyű dizájn nagyon vonzó. Sajnos csak nem tudjuk megtenni, a rossz üzemidő és az idegesítő ventilátor vezérlés miatt. Nagy kár, mert ebben a gépben sok potenciál van. A Vaio-nak csak újra kéne dolgoznia a ventilátor vezérlést és betennie egy nagyobb akkut a következő verzióba - még akkor is, ha ez valamivel nagyobb súlyt eredményez.

VAIO SX14 - 04/30/2019 v6
Benjamin Herzig

Váz
88 /  98 → 90%
Billentyűzet
84%
Érintőpad
84%
Csatlakoztathatóság
72 / 80 → 90%
Súly
75 / 35-78 → 93%
Akkumulátor
87%
Kijelző
77%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
60 / 68 → 88%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
90 / 87 → 100%
Hőmérséklet
93 / 91 → 100%
Zaj
81%
Audio
41 / 91 → 45%
Camera
39 / 85 → 46%
Átlag
75%
85%
Subnotebook - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Vaio SX14 (i5-8265U, FHD) Laptop rövid értékelés
Benjamin Herzig, 2019-05-30 (Update: 2019-05-30)