Notebookcheck

Schenker XMG Ultra 17 (Clevo P775TM1-G) Laptop rövid értékelés

Florian Glaser (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 03/12/2018
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows

Hat mag erejével. Azután, hogy a négymagos processzorok voltak évekig az alapértelmezettek az erősebb notebookokban és asztali gépekben, 2018 elhozta a hat és nyolcmagos procik szélesebb elterjedését, hála az Intel Coffee Lake és az AMD Ryzen architektúrájának. A Schenker XMG Ultra 17-nek bizonyítania kell, úgy is, mint az egyik első hatmagos processzoros notebook.

Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Processzor
Intel Core i7-8700, Socket 1151
Grafikus adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Mag: 1657 MHz, Memória: 2500 MHz, GDDR5X, MXM, ForceWare 390.77
Memória
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, 2/4 hely szabad, max. 64 GB
Kijelző
17.3 hüvelyk 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, UHD, AHVA, 60 Hz, G-Sync, fényes: nem
Alaplap
Intel Z370 (Kaby Lake)
Háttértár
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe, 500 GB 
, + Seagate Barracuda ST2000LM015, 2 TB HDD, 5400 rpm. Slotok: 2x M2-2280 + 2x 2.5 inches
Hangkártya
Realtek ALC899 @ Intel Union Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Csatlakozók
4 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington zár, Audió csatlakozók: fejhallgató, mikrofon, Line-in, Line-out, Kártyaolvasó: SD,SDXC,SDHC,miniSD,MMC,RSMMC, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó
Hálózat
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 41 x 418 x 295
Akkumulátor
82 Wh, 5400 mAh Lítium-Ion, removeable, 8 cellás
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webkamera: FHD
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: 2.1, Billentyűzet: 3 zónás RGB, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, 330 wattos hálózati adapter, kezelési útmutató, driver DVD, helyreállító DVD, pendrive eszközökkel, 2.5 inches meghajtó tartozékok, Control Center, 24 Hónap Garancia
Súly
4.368 kg, Tápegység: 1.274 kg
Ár
3500 EUR

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Guru Mars K
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194 MB/s ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
187 MB/s ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=197)
90.6 MB/s ∼47% -52%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83 MB/s ∼43% -56%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s ∼41% -58%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208 MB/s ∼100%
Guru Mars K
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
205 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=195)
110 MB/s ∼53% -47%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s ∼43% -57%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼42% -58%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
700 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
689 MBit/s ∼98%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼97% -1%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
606 MBit/s ∼87% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=162)
591 MBit/s ∼84% -14%
Guru Mars K
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
389 MBit/s ∼56% -44%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
628 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
596 MBit/s ∼95%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
589 MBit/s ∼94% -1%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
558 MBit/s ∼89% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=162)
526 MBit/s ∼84% -12%
Guru Mars K
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
406 MBit/s ∼65% -32%
301
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 332 cd/m² Átlag: 312.9 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 88 %
Centrumban: 332 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1186:1 (Fekete: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.86 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.33 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160
Guru Mars K
LGD046E, IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 1920x1080
Alienware 17 R4
TN LED, 2560x1440
Response Times
5%
-8%
74%
40%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44 (22.8, 21.2)
37.6 (18.8, 18.8)
15%
45 (18, 27)
-2%
11.6 (6.4, 5.2)
74%
30 (18.8, 11.2)
32%
Response Time Black / White *
24.8 (11.6, 13.2)
26.4 (14, 12.4)
-6%
28 (6, 22)
-13%
6.8 (4.8, 2)
73%
12.8 (10.8, 2)
48%
PWM Frequency
133.3 (95)
25000 (15)
Screen
-7%
-10%
13%
-31%
Brightness middle
332
343
3%
380
14%
274
-17%
402.3
21%
Brightness
313
330
5%
362
16%
262
-16%
372
19%
Brightness Distribution
88
91
3%
91
3%
87
-1%
86
-2%
Black Level *
0.28
0.32
-14%
0.37
-32%
0.26
7%
0.62
-121%
Contrast
1186
1072
-10%
1027
-13%
1054
-11%
649
-45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.86
3.61
6%
4.12
-7%
1.36
65%
5.6
-45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.88
8.16
-39%
8.19
-39%
4.1
30%
9.8
-67%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.33
3.03
30%
3.95
9%
0.64
85%
4.7
-9%
Gamma
2.41 100%
2.41 100%
2.47 97%
2.19 110%
2.14 112%
CCT
6595 99%
6568 99%
6539 99%
6551 99%
7519 86%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88
56
-36%
55
-37%
77
-12%
53.7
-39%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
85
-15%
84
-16%
100
0%
82.2
-18%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1% / -5%
-9% / -10%
44% / 23%
5% / -19%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.8 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
34532
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7171
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.18 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.9 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1167 Points
Segítség
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-8700
  (190 - 197, n=2)
194 Points ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Intel Core i7-8700
190 Points ∼98%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
184 Points ∼95% -3%
Guru Mars K
Intel Core i7-7700
178 Points ∼92% -6%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
171 Points ∼88% -10%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
160 Points ∼82% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 207, n=400)
151 Points ∼78% -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-8700
  (1167 - 1215, n=2)
1191 Points ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Intel Core i7-8700
1167 Points ∼98%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
874 Points ∼73% -25%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
867 Points ∼73% -26%
Guru Mars K
Intel Core i7-7700
857 Points ∼72% -27%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
758 Points ∼64% -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1408, n=401)
732 Points ∼61% -37%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Intel Core i7-8700
2.18 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8700
 
2.18 Points ∼100% 0%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.08 Points ∼95% -5%
Guru Mars K
Intel Core i7-7700
2.02 Points ∼93% -7%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.81 Points ∼83% -17%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.69 Points ∼78% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.34, n=397)
1.671 Points ∼77% -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Intel Core i7-8700
12.9 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8700
 
12.9 Points ∼100% 0%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.55 Points ∼74% -26%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.53 Points ∼74% -26%
Guru Mars K
Intel Core i7-7700
9.52 Points ∼74% -26%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.34 Points ∼65% -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 15.8, n=498)
7.16 Points ∼56% -44%
PCMark 10 - Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5976 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8700, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
 
5976 Points ∼100% 0%
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5856 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5211 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6620, n=102)
4918 Points ∼82% -18%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
6123 Points ∼100% +26%
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
6015 Points ∼98% +24%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5444 Points ∼89% +12%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5088 Points ∼83% +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=298)
4900 Points ∼80% +1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
4849 Points ∼79%
Average Intel Core i7-8700, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
 
4849 Points ∼79% 0%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5975 Points ∼100% +23%
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5847 Points ∼98% +20%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5237 Points ∼88% +8%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5064 Points ∼85% +4%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
4865 Points ∼81%
Average Intel Core i7-8700, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
 
4865 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=316)
4209 Points ∼70% -13%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4865 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4849 pontok
Segítség
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
Guru Mars K
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
Alienware 17 R4
SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
Average Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
 
AS SSD
-23%
1%
-39%
-3%
Score Total
4173
2581
-38%
3392
-19%
2072
-50%
3968 (3629 - 4173, n=9)
-5%
Score Write
1615
930
-42%
1289
-20%
858
-47%
1518 (1231 - 1670, n=9)
-6%
Score Read
1716
1118
-35%
1412
-18%
831
-52%
1645 (1493 - 1857, n=9)
-4%
4K Write
139.47
133.79
-4%
128.75
-8%
113.36
-19%
142 (113 - 181, n=9)
2%
4K Read
43.65
39.52
-9%
50.12
15%
35.61
-18%
45.5 (41.5 - 49.2, n=9)
4%
Seq Write
1771.22
1338.19
-24%
2352.3
33%
734.8
-59%
1647 (1277 - 1836, n=9)
-7%
Seq Read
2532.5
2261.03
-11%
3136.95
24%
1752.03
-31%
2433 (1479 - 2758, n=9)
-4%
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3308 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1839 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 392.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 340 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1750 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1725 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 44.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 153.5 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
7166 Points ∼100% +3%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
7140 Points ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
6977 Points ∼97%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
  (6380 - 7166, n=7)
6861 Points ∼96% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=69)
4748 Points ∼66% -32%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
22566 Points ∼100% +7%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21846 Points ∼97% +4%
Guru Mars K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21778 Points ∼97% +3%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21366 Points ∼95% +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
  (18879 - 23091, n=23)
21324 Points ∼94% +1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21104 Points ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=430)
10223 Points ∼45% -52%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Guru Mars K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
29615 Points ∼100% +3%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
29109 Points ∼98% +2%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
28621 Points ∼97%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
28595 Points ∼97% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
  (24868 - 31412, n=25)
28086 Points ∼95% -2%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
26438 Points ∼89% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=503)
11784 Points ∼40% -59%
3DMark 06 Standard
30222 pontok
3DMark 11 Performance
22034 pontok
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
37952 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17997 pontok
3DMark Time Spy Score
6942 pontok
Segítség
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700
52.6 fps ∼100% +3%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
52.2 fps ∼99% +2%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700
51.3 fps ∼98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
  (46.7 - 55.8, n=9)
51.1 fps ∼97% 0%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
46.8 fps ∼89% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.3 - 89.2, n=44)
39.9 fps ∼76% -22%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
78.1 fps ∼100% +3%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
75.9 fps ∼97% 0%
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700
75.9 fps ∼97% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700
75.6 fps ∼97%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
  (62 - 78.1, n=21)
73 fps ∼93% -3%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
68.5 fps ∼88% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=205)
45.1 fps ∼58% -40%
alacsony közepes magas ultra4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 14275.651.3fps
FIFA 18 (2017) 289286249fps
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) 13612752.1fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 867639fps
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 16013163.2fps
Need for Speed Payback (2017) 13713148.9fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 13711539.6fps
Fortnite (2018) 19414141.4fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 74.431.8fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 10476.825.8fps

Zajszint

Üresjárat
34 / 35 / 40 dB(A)
Terhelés
45 / 60 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
csendes
40 dB(A)
hallható
50 dB(A)
hangos
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Noise
0%
6%
0%
2%
off / environment *
30
29
3%
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.2
6%
Idle Minimum *
34
36
-6%
33
3%
33
3%
35.6
-5%
Idle Average *
35
37
-6%
35
-0%
34
3%
35.6
-2%
Idle Maximum *
40
40
-0%
37
7%
38
5%
35.7
11%
Load Average *
45
45
-0%
40
11%
44
2%
50.2
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
52
50
4%
56
-8%
50.2
3%
Load Maximum *
60
55
8%
50
17%
62
-3%
50.2
16%

* ... smaller is better

Max. terhelés
 39 °C40 °C37 °C 
 40 °C41 °C36 °C 
 27 °C29 °C25 °C 
Maximum: 41 °C
Átlag: 34.9 °C
48 °C48 °C33 °C
43 °C43 °C29 °C
23 °C27 °C27 °C
Maximum: 48 °C
Átlag: 35.7 °C
Tápegység (max.)  50 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Heat
-1%
0%
-11%
-5%
Maximum Upper Side *
41
46
-12%
44.2
-8%
46
-12%
49.6
-21%
Maximum Bottom *
48
46
4%
43
10%
57
-19%
56
-17%
Idle Upper Side *
30
32
-7%
32.4
-8%
34
-13%
29.6
1%
Idle Bottom *
35
31
11%
32.8
6%
35
-0%
29.2
17%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.843.72537.141.43130.837.14032.433.45026.128.663263180244610024.661.312522.656.216022.156.62002361.725024.663.731520.469.640018.476.450018.57563017.571.480017.771100017.264.6125016.864.7160016.962.3200017.165250017.265.8315017.664.5400017.564.7500017.663.2630017.562800017.462.41000018.361.11250018.259.71600017.450.9SPL29.879.2N1.348.3median 17.6Schenker XMG Ultra 17median 63.7Delta1.62.341.346.639.24230.133.337.639.831.735.83138.931.446.129.849.723.753.922.262.520.773.221.174.320.876.119.577.319.276.118.77318.972.119.277.818.975.819.472.818.168.917.474.117.578.517.57217.571.717.571.317.666.217.662.817.661.117.552.730.586.11.473median 18.9Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DLmedian 72.11.56.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.4 / 1.2 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 32 / 38 / 45 Watt
Terhelés midlight 96 / 331 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Power Consumption
-3%
12%
-7%
2%
Idle Minimum *
32
31
3%
27
16%
34
-6%
37.5
-17%
Idle Average *
38
37
3%
32
16%
41
-8%
37.6
1%
Idle Maximum *
45
44
2%
41
9%
50
-11%
37.6
16%
Load Average *
96
116
-21%
102
-6%
106
-10%
122.4
-28%
Load Maximum *
331
312
6%
248
25%
320
3%
277.4
16%
Witcher 3 ultra *
237
259
-9%
257
-8%
180.3
24%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
2h 44min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
2h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2h 28min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
1h 10min
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700, 82 Wh
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7700, 82 Wh
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 88.8 Wh
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 75 Wh
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 99 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
26%
59%
1%
31%
63%
Reader / Idle
164
200
22%
313
91%
182
11%
276
68%
327 (39 - 1174, n=580)
99%
H.264
148
153
3%
204
38%
148
0%
244 (88 - 506, n=121)
65%
WiFi v1.3
142
251
77%
144
1%
181
27%
248 (78 - 622, n=255)
75%
Load
70
107
53%
90
29%
65
-7%
69
-1%
78.5 (18 - 202, n=547)
12%

Pro

+ UHD kijelző, remek színhűség
+ kiváló bővíthetőség
+ egyedileg konfigurálható
+ kitűnő teljesítmény
+ modern hardver
+ RGB háttérfény
+ nincs bloatware
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ jó hang

Kontra

- vastag és nehéz
- idegesítő ventilátorvezérlés
- a GPU néha nagyon felforrósodik
- korlátozott CPU turbo
- magas fogyasztás
- rövid üzemidő
XMG Ultra 17, provided by Schenker Technologies.
XMG Ultra 17, provided by Schenker Technologies.

Az XMG Ultra 17 olyan nagyigényű gamereknek készült, akik (már) nem akarnak asztali házat, de annak bővíhetőségét és csatlakozókínálatát igen. Ennek a vevőkörnek készült a Schenker Technologies 17 inches behemótja.

Ami pozitív: a kitűnő beviteli eszközök mellett egy kitűnő, G-Sync-es UHD kijelzőt kapunk, amelynek színhűsége a kategória legjobbja. A teljesítménye is kiváló: az Intel Coffee Lake CPU és az Nvidia Pascal GPU  remekül teljesít, bár a mai játékok ritkán használják ki a hat processzormag nyújtotta előnyöket.

Amiben fejlődhetne: a ventilátorvezérlés, amely - a Clevo barebone-októl megszokottan - messze nem tökéletes. Jó üzemidőre szintén ne számítsunk.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Schenker XMG Ultra 17 - 02/23/2018 v6
Florian Glaser

Váz
79 / 98 → 81%
Billentyűzet
85%
Érintőpad
78%
Csatlakoztathatóság
75 / 81 → 93%
Súly
45 / 10-66 → 63%
Akkumulátor
65%
Kijelző
90%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
100%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
98%
Hőmérséklet
82 / 95 → 87%
Zaj
54 / 90 → 60%
Audio
85%
Átlag
78%
88%
Gaming - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Schenker XMG Ultra 17 (Clevo P775TM1-G) Laptop rövid értékelés
Florian Glaser, 2018-03-12 (Update: 2018-03-12)