Notebookcheck

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 Tablet rövid értékelés

Mike Wobker (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 01/02/2018
Tablet Android

Üzleti, elvitelre. A Samsung majdnem három teljes év után frissítette fel a Galaxy Tab Active-ot. Por- és vízálló, valamint a leejtéseket is elég jól bírja. Az LTE és tollal történő bevitel az előd modellt nagyon népszerűvé tette azok között, akiknek egy kültéri társra volt szükségük. Cikkünk rávilágít, hogy a Galaxy Tab Active 2 csak egy kis fejlesztésen esett át.

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 (Galaxy Tab Széria)
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memória
3072 MB 
, LPDDR3
Kijelző
8 hüvelyk 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 189 PPI, kapacitív, native pen support, TFT LCD, fényes: igen
Háttértár
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.5 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: fejhallgató jack, Kártyaolvasó: microSD, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: ujjlenyomatolvasó, gyorsulásmérő, giroszenzor, közelségérzékelő, iránytű
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, LTE (Cat.6), HSPA+, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 13 x 238 x 133
Akkumulátor
16.91 Wh, 4450 mAh Lítium-Ion, removeable, Akkumulátor üzemidő (gyártói adat): 11 h, Beszédidő 3G (gyártói adat): 23 h
Operációs rendszer
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: sztereo, Billentyűzet: virtuális, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, S Pen, Samsung Flow, Samsung Notes, 24 Hónap Garancia, fanless, ruggedized
Súly
512 g, Tápegység: 60 g
Ár
500 Euró

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
465 MBit/s ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
315 MBit/s ∼68%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 MBit/s ∼21% -68%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.5 MBit/s ∼10% -85%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.7 MBit/s ∼9% -86%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
389 MBit/s ∼100% +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
260 MBit/s ∼67%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
86 MBit/s ∼22% -67%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.2 MBit/s ∼12% -83%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
41.5 MBit/s ∼11% -84%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
471
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
509
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 509 cd/m² Átlag: 477.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.4 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 91 %
Centrumban: 509 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1060:1 (Fekete: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.45 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
99.9% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.11
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
TFT LCD, 1280x800, 8
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
TFT, 1280x800, 8
Lenovo Tab 4 8
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
IPS, 1920x1200, 8
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Apple iPad (2017)
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7
Screen
-31%
-38%
-26%
-57%
21%
Brightness middle
509
424
-17%
455
-11%
409.1
-20%
419
-18%
514
1%
Brightness
477
426
-11%
446
-6%
402
-16%
412
-14%
485
2%
Brightness Distribution
91
85
-7%
91
0%
92
1%
91
0%
88
-3%
Black Level *
0.48
0.7
-46%
0.51
-6%
0.56
-17%
0.39
19%
0.46
4%
Contrast
1060
606
-43%
892
-16%
731
-31%
1074
1%
1117
5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.45
5.7
-65%
5.5
-59%
4.1
-19%
8.5
-146%
1.4
59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.17
14.8
-186%
9.6
-86%
13.8
-167%
2.9
44%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.5
5.76
-28%
5.5
-22%
5.3
-18%
10.3
-129%
2.1
53%
Gamma
2.11 114%
2.36 102%
2.23 108%
2.2 109%
2.6 92%
2.22 108%
CCT
7171 91%
7236 90%
7852 83%
7603 85%
6216 105%
6647 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10390 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.7 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Apple iPad (2017)
128706 Points ∼56% +182%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
46126 Points ∼20% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
45573 Points ∼20%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
36893 Points ∼16% -19%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
34714 Points ∼15% -24%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
3789 Points ∼37%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
3744 Points ∼36% -1%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
3312 Points ∼32% -13%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
2907 Points ∼28% -23%
Work performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4945 Points ∼48%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
4843 Points ∼47% -2%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
4457 Points ∼43% -10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
4125 Points ∼40% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
2769 Points ∼27% -44%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPad (2017)
1213 Points ∼72% +74%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
773 Points ∼46% +11%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
702 Points ∼41% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
699 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
595 Points ∼35% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
593 Points ∼35% -15%
Graphics
Apple iPad (2017)
4569 Points ∼49% +762%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
777 Points ∼8% +47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
530 Points ∼6%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
447 Points ∼5% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
355 Points ∼4% -33%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
334 Points ∼4% -37%
Memory
Apple iPad (2017)
1341 Points ∼30% +14%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
1224 Points ∼28% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
1176 Points ∼27%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
784 Points ∼18% -33%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
736 Points ∼17% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
324 Points ∼7% -72%
System
Apple iPad (2017)
4680 Points ∼46% +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
2337 Points ∼23%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
1980 Points ∼19% -15%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
1477 Points ∼14% -37%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
1152 Points ∼11% -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
881 Points ∼9% -62%
Overall
Apple iPad (2017)
2441 Points ∼57% +143%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
1072 Points ∼25% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
1005 Points ∼23%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
796 Points ∼18% -21%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
640 Points ∼15% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
496 Points ∼12% -51%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
2369 Points ∼16%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
1324 Points ∼9% -44%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
3710 Points ∼13%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
2821 Points ∼10% -24%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
1908 Points ∼7% -49%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
1683 Points ∼6% -55%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
726 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
688 Points ∼12% -5%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
670 Points ∼11% -8%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
628 Points ∼11% -13%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
1721 Points ∼47%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
1324 Points ∼36% -23%
Apple iPad (2017)
1098 Points ∼30% -36%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
878 Points ∼24% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad (2017)
2519 Points ∼47% +954%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
263 Points ∼5% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
239 Points ∼4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
121 Points ∼2% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad (2017)
1957 Points ∼41% +561%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
320 Points ∼7% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
296 Points ∼6%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
150 Points ∼3% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
1522 Points ∼42%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
1332 Points ∼37% -12%
Apple iPad (2017)
1074 Points ∼29% -29%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
881 Points ∼24% -42%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
874 Points ∼24% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad (2017)
4320 Points ∼52% +983%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
538 Points ∼7% +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
399 Points ∼5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
193 Points ∼2% -52%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
42 Points ∼1% -89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad (2017)
2584 Points ∼41% +442%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
620 Points ∼10% +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
477 Points ∼7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
234 Points ∼4% -51%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
53 Points ∼1% -89%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Apple iPad (2017)
13324 Points ∼17% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
12947 Points ∼16%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
10458 Points ∼13% -19%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
9274 Points ∼12% -28%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
9264 Points ∼12% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
7763 Points ∼10% -40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad (2017)
44645 Points ∼9% +478%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
10163 Points ∼2% +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
7720 Points ∼2%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
5496 Points ∼1% -29%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5435 Points ∼1% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
4166 Points ∼1% -46%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad (2017)
29326 Points ∼14% +246%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
9948 Points ∼5% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
8481 Points ∼4%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
6144 Points ∼3% -28%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5986 Points ∼3% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
4644 Points ∼2% -45%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad (2017)
80.8 fps ∼5% +573%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
17 fps ∼1% +42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
12 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
9.9 fps ∼1% -17%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
7.8 fps ∼0% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
5.8 fps ∼0% -52%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad (2017)
56 fps ∼12% +195%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
19 fps ∼4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
17 fps ∼4% -11%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
16 fps ∼3% -16%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
14 fps ∼3% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
10 fps ∼2% -47%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad (2017)
40.6 fps ∼7% +696%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
6.9 fps ∼1% +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
5.1 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
3.6 fps ∼1% -29%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
2.8 fps ∼1% -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
1.6 fps ∼0% -69%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad (2017)
28.7 fps ∼8% +212%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
9.2 fps ∼3%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
7.6 fps ∼2% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
7.1 fps ∼2% -23%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
5.9 fps ∼2% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
3.5 fps ∼1% -62%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad (2017)
28.5 fps ∼5% +791%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
4.9 fps ∼1% +53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
3.2 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
2.3 fps ∼0% -28%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad (2017)
18.5 fps ∼11% +176%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
6.7 fps ∼4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5 fps ∼3% -25%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
4.6 fps ∼3% -31%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
2.7 fps ∼1% +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
2 fps ∼1%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
3.7 fps ∼3%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
2.5 fps ∼2% -32%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab 4 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad (2017) Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 128 GB NVMe
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad (2017)
18148 Points ∼100% +281%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4768 Points ∼26%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 (Google Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
3049 Points ∼17% -36%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
2903 Points ∼16% -39%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
2826 Points ∼16% -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active (Chrome 40)
1891 Points ∼10% -60%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPad (2017)
205 Points ∼100% +206%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
69 Points ∼34% +3%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 (Google Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
69 Points ∼34% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
67 Points ∼33%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
57 Points ∼28% -15%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPad (2017)
128.6 Points ∼100% +393%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
26.099 Points ∼20%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
19.519 Points ∼15% -25%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
18.36 Points ∼14% -30%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 (Google Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
17.68 Points ∼14% -32%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active (Chrome 40)
17355.5 ms * ∼100% -156%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 (Google Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
12635 ms * ∼73% -86%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
12033 ms * ∼69% -77%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
11817.6 ms * ∼68% -74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
6785.6 ms * ∼39%
Apple iPad (2017)
1457.7 ms * ∼8% +79%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2Samsung Galaxy Tab ActiveLenovo Tab 4 8Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
AndroBench 3-5
-21%
16%
-21%
-22%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.3
61.1
-5%
14.6
-77%
34.15
-47%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
78.6
84.8
8%
87.7
12%
51.06
-35%
Random Write 4KB
10.98
9.76
-11%
7.1
-35%
7.64
-30%
11.51
5%
Random Read 4KB
25.96
20.24
-22%
44
69%
35
35%
21.55
-17%
Sequential Write 256KB
53.99
42.81
-21%
72.3
34%
38.01
-30%
47.23
-13%
Sequential Read 256KB
218.05
151.82
-30%
265.1
22%
135.09
-38%
159.08
-27%
Max. terhelés
 33.3 °C29.5 °C28.3 °C 
 35.5 °C30 °C28.2 °C 
 33.6 °C29.5 °C28.3 °C 
Maximum: 35.5 °C
Átlag: 30.7 °C
28 °C28.9 °C31.9 °C
28.9 °C30.1 °C33.2 °C
28.2 °C30.2 °C34.4 °C
Maximum: 34.4 °C
Átlag: 30.4 °C
Tápegység (max.)  36.4 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.428.327.42529.428.329.43129.931.129.94039.329.439.35027.427.227.4632625.7268026.724.726.710035.324.835.312544.828.544.816050.221.850.220053.22253.225052.222.452.231556.422.756.440060.323.360.350065.924.465.963066.219.666.280065.51865.5100065.617.665.6125066.118.466.1160071.216.771.2200075.716.375.7250077.915.677.9315076.615.876.6400076.515.376.5500074.315.374.3630075.815.375.8800071.515.171.51000069.915.269.9125007515.2751600077.715.177.7SPL86.129.886.1N62.31.362.3median 66.2Apple iPad (2017)median 17.6median 66.2Delta103.710hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Apple iPad (2017) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.16 / 0.22 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.89 / 3.13 / 3.36 Watt
Terhelés midlight 3.93 / 5.45 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4450 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 8
4850 mAh
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
4800 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
 mAh
Apple iPad (2017)
8.827 mAh
Power Consumption
23%
-19%
-141%
-0%
-131%
Idle Minimum *
0.89
0.6
33%
1.1
-24%
4.02
-352%
0.99
-11%
2.06
-131%
Idle Average *
3.13
2.2
30%
3.51
-12%
6
-92%
2.74
12%
7.42
-137%
Idle Maximum *
3.36
2.5
26%
4.14
-23%
6.64
-98%
2.83
16%
7.47
-122%
Load Average *
3.93
3.7
6%
4.86
-24%
7.34
-87%
4.51
-15%
9.45
-140%
Load Maximum *
5.45
4.3
21%
6.13
-12%
9.6
-76%
5.69
-4%
12.31
-126%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
22h 37min
WiFi böngészés
0h 00min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 55min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 13min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
6h 36min
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4450 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 8
4850 mAh
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
4800 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
 mAh
Apple iPad (2017)
8.827 mAh
Battery Runtime
18%
-17%
7%
22%
6%
Reader / Idle
1357
1640
21%
1207
-11%
1382
2%
2032
50%
1496
10%
H.264
493
771
56%
603
22%
744
51%
845
71%
WiFi v1.3
895
452
-49%
877
-2%
770
-14%
764
-15%
Load
396
306
-23%
276
-30%
480
21%
393
-1%
225
-43%
WiFi
861

Pro

+ jó kivitelezés
+ strapabíró ház
+ kivehető telep
+ S-Pen
+ microSD, max. 256 GB
+ világos kijelző
+ alig melegszik

Kontra

- középszerű üzemidő
- alacsony felbontású kijelző
- lassú háttértár
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2. Review unit courtesy of Samsung Germany.
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2. Review unit courtesy of Samsung Germany.

Nincs kétségünk afelől, hogy a Galaxy Tab Active 2 nagyon szívós mindenes. Az operációs rendszer simán fut, a gép a mindennapi feladatokkal könnyen megbirkózik. A belső tárhely erősen korlátozott, úgyhogy előbb-utóbb szükség lehet egy extra microSD kártyára. Az viszont akár 256 GB kapacitású is lehet.

A vastag és kemény burkolat egy középkategóriás tabletet rejt. Megfelelően felszerelt, és már csak azért is meg fogják venni az érdeklődők, mert nem sok riválisa akad.

Az, hogy a Galaxy Tab Active 2 mennyire lesz használható egy műhelyben, garázsban vagy építkezésen, az majd kiderül. Egyértelműen strapabíróbb, mint a versenytársai, és terepi munkák, vagy túrázás közben megbízható társunk lehet. A kijelző kesztyűben is használható, és a mellékelt S-Pen nagyon pontos bevitelt tesz lehetővé.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 - 12/22/2017 v6
Mike Wobker

Váz
86%
Billentyűzet
72 / 80 → 90%
Érintőpad
87%
Csatlakoztathatóság
43 / 65 → 66%
Súly
83 / 40-88 → 89%
Akkumulátor
90%
Kijelző
86%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
16 / 68 → 23%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
45 / 76 → 59%
Hőmérséklet
92%
Zaj
100%
Audio
44 / 91 → 48%
Camera
71 / 85 → 83%
Átlag
70%
81%
Tablet - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 Tablet rövid értékelés
Mike Wobker, 2018-01- 2 (Update: 2018-01- 2)