Notebookcheck

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra rövid értékelés - Egy okostelefon erőteljes funkciókkal és S Pen tollal

Legyen világosság! A Note20 Ultra emeli a mércét, különösen a kijelzővel, viszont régi hibák is megismétel, amelyek megvannak a Galaxy S20 Ultra-ban. Egy nagy akkumulátorral, új dizájnnal, javított kamerával és az S Pen tollal a legerősebb Note modell meg akarja hódítani a vásárlók szívét. Értékelésünk fényt derít arra, hogy van-e ennek bármi akadálya.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (fordította Zoltán Kiss), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android ARM Business Galaxy Note Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Galaxy Note Széria)
Processzor
Samsung Exynos 990 8 x 2 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M5 / Cortex A-76 / Cortex-A55
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
Memória
12288 MB 
, LPDDR5
Kijelző
6.90 hüvelyk 19.3:9, 3088 x 1440 pixel 494 PPI, kapacitív érintőképernyő, native pen support, dynamic AMOLED, fényes: igen, HDR, 120 Hz
Háttértár
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 221.3 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audió csatlakozók: USB Type-C, Kártyaolvasó: microSD 1 TB-ig (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: helyzetérzékelő, gyorsulásmérő, geomágneses érzékelő, Hall szenzor, közelségérzékelő, barométer, MST
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1,800, and 1,900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA (B1 (2,100), B2 (1,900), B4 (AWS), B5 (850), B8 (900)), LTE (B1 (2,100), B2 (1,900), B3 (1,800), B4 (AWS), B5 (850), B7 (2,600), B8 (900), B12 (700), B13 (700), B17 (700), B18 (800), B19 (800), B20, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 8.1 x 164.8 x 77.2
Akkumulátor
4500 mAh Lítium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operációs rendszer
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (1/1.33", f/1.8, OIS) + 12 MP (ultraszéles látószög, 1/2.55", f/2.2) + 12 MP (5x optikai zoom, f/3.0, 1/3.0", OIS), 8K videó, Kamera2 API szint: Teljes
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.2, DPAF)
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: sztereó hangszórók, Billentyűzet: képernyőn, hálózati adapter, USB kábel, SIM-kiadó eszköz, headset, dokumentáció, One UI, Microsoft apps, Spotify, 24 Hónap Garancia, DRM Widevine L1, SAR (fej): 0.338 W/kg, SAR (test): 1,470 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Súly
208 g, Tápegység: 69 g
Ár
1,266 Euró
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89 %
12/2020
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
208 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.90"3088x1440
87 %
12/2019
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12
196 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.80"3040x1440
89 %
10/2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
88 %
07/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
87 %
10/2019
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
226 g64 GB SSD6.50"2688x1242

Size comparison

164.8 mm 77.2 mm 8.1 mm 208 g162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g162.3 mm 77.2 mm 7.9 mm 196 g158.1 mm 73.1 mm 8.8 mm 198 g158 mm 77.8 mm 8.1 mm 226 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (912min - 1092max) MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (468min - 602max) MBit/s ∼53% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
883 (834min - 919max) MBit/s ∼87% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
870 (841min - 882max) MBit/s ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
670 (326min - 802max) MBit/s ∼66% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
349 (310min - 384max) MBit/s ∼35% -60%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (550min - 597max) MBit/s ∼57% -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=641)
290 MBit/s ∼29% -67%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (923min - 995max) MBit/s ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (584min - 715max) MBit/s ∼66% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
816 (403min - 832max) MBit/s ∼84% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
772 (691min - 832max) MBit/s ∼80%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (461min - 625max) MBit/s ∼61% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
558 (496min - 582max) MBit/s ∼58% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
534 (468min - 587max) MBit/s ∼55% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=641)
276 MBit/s ∼29% -64%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø870 (841-882)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø772 (691-832)
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge section
Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge section
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Overview
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Overview
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Turning point
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Turning point
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Bridge section
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - Bridge section

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow-LightZoomUltraweitwinkel
ColorChecker
20 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
30 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra: 26.47 ∆E min: 12.19 - max: 38.55 ∆E
ColorChecker
9.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra: 5.98 ∆E min: 2.09 - max: 13.62 ∆E
870
cd/m²
878
cd/m²
889
cd/m²
867
cd/m²
860
cd/m²
889
cd/m²
883
cd/m²
869
cd/m²
898
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 898 cd/m² Átlag: 878.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.91 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 96 %
Centrumban: 860 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.90
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Dynamic AMOLED, 3040x1440, 6.80
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.50
Screen
9%
4%
30%
23%
Brightness middle
860
683
-21%
592
-31%
753
-12%
790
-8%
Brightness
878
694
-21%
605
-31%
762
-13%
790
-10%
Brightness Distribution
96
96
0%
96
0%
96
0%
97
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
2.9
36%
2.5
44%
0.9
80%
1.4
69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.4
4.8
54%
5.5
47%
1.6
85%
3.4
67%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
2.2
8%
2.6
-8%
1.5
37%
1.9
21%
Gamma
2 110%
2.11 104%
2.16 102%
2.24 98%
2.23 99%
CCT
6466 101%
6247 104%
6173 105%
6415 101%
6466 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

HDR - Mixed colors (target color space: DCI P3)
HDR - Mixed colors (target color space: DCI P3)
HDR - Grayscale tracking (target color space: BT.2020)
HDR - Grayscale tracking (target color space: BT.2020)
HDR - Saturation (target color space: DCI P3)
HDR - Saturation (target color space: DCI P3)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5532 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5364 - 5532, n=2)
5448 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7400, n=66)
1918 Points ∼35% -65%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4789 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4667 - 4789, n=2)
4728 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6252, n=69)
1678 Points ∼35% -65%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
2787 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
2331 Points ∼67% -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3062 Points ∼88% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3338 Points ∼96% +20%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3476 Points ∼100% +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (2731 - 2899, n=5)
2800 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=170)
1937 Points ∼56% -30%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
940 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
834 Points ∼63% -11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
781 Points ∼59% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
906 Points ∼68% -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1326 Points ∼100% +41%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (903 - 944, n=5)
929 Points ∼70% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (63 - 1604, n=170)
560 Points ∼42% -40%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
12561 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
10367 Points ∼79% -17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12280 Points ∼93% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
13186 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (12557 - 12561, n=2)
12559 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 14476, n=432)
5053 Points ∼38% -60%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4965 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4549 Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3898 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4261 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4791 - 4965, n=2)
4878 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4970, n=432)
1545 Points ∼31% -69%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
11784 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
9027 Points ∼77% -23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10952 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10008 - 11784, n=5)
10612 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=567)
6083 Points ∼52% -48%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
14551 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
11813 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
13142 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (13627 - 14760, n=5)
14391 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=716)
6702 Points ∼46% -54%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3122 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
2571 Points ∼66% -18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3830 Points ∼99% +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3104 - 3230, n=5)
3154 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=219)
2636 Points ∼68% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6378 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
6186 Points ∼76% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼78% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8173 Points ∼100% +28%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6136 - 8783, n=5)
7254 Points ∼89% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=219)
3011 Points ∼37% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5178 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4713 Points ∼72% -9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼85% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6578 Points ∼100% +27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5042 - 6355, n=5)
5599 Points ∼85% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=219)
2656 Points ∼40% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4273 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3389 Points ∼61% -21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5277 Points ∼95% +23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4063 - 4495, n=5)
4284 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=576)
2290 Points ∼41% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8239 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
6036 Points ∼65% -27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼71% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9356 Points ∼100% +14%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (870 - 9190, n=5)
7112 Points ∼76% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=576)
2288 Points ∼24% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6830 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5143 Points ∼64% -25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼80% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7986 Points ∼100% +17%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6638 - 7459, n=5)
7083 Points ∼89% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=577)
2113 Points ∼26% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4127 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3498 Points ∼68% -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4283 Points ∼83% +4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3935 - 4455, n=5)
4240 Points ∼83% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=607)
2208 Points ∼43% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9536 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5083 Points ∼40% -47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼63% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12694 Points ∼100% +33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (9470 - 11868, n=5)
10329 Points ∼81% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=607)
3140 Points ∼25% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7385 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4618 Points ∼52% -37%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼80% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8823 Points ∼100% +19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (7385 - 8485, n=5)
7798 Points ∼88% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=607)
2578 Points ∼29% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4052 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3353 Points ∼68% -17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4895 Points ∼100% +21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼82% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3963 - 4267, n=5)
4091 Points ∼83% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=656)
2165 Points ∼44% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8156 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5712 Points ∼69% -30%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼78% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8299 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼73% -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8005 - 8469, n=5)
8260 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=656)
1906 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6658 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4940 Points ∼69% -26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼85% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7157 Points ∼100% +7%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼76% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6544 - 6896, n=5)
6733 Points ∼94% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=657)
1809 Points ∼25% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3846 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3273 Points ∼67% -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4729 Points ∼97% +23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼78% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3846 - 4124, n=5)
3990 Points ∼81% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5301, n=698)
2038 Points ∼42% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9480 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5043 Points ∼41% -47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼62% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12394 Points ∼100% +31%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼91% +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6388 - 11488, n=5)
9004 Points ∼73% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=697)
2545 Points ∼21% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7152 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4502 Points ∼49% -37%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼75% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9123 Points ∼100% +28%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼87% +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5646 - 8097, n=5)
6920 Points ∼76% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=700)
2173 Points ∼24% -70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
39724 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
33268 Points ∼77% -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43459 Points ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
32384 Points ∼75% -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼78% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (27431 - 42135, n=4)
37265 Points ∼86% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=842)
15957 Points ∼37% -60%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
84533 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
66142 Points ∼32% -22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75073 Points ∼36% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
150281 Points ∼73% +78%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +144%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (48476 - 87223, n=4)
74951 Points ∼36% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=840)
29153 Points ∼14% -66%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
67590 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
54233 Points ∼56% -20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
64626 Points ∼67% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
82937 Points ∼86% +23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (41415 - 68943, n=4)
61100 Points ∼63% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=840)
22274 Points ∼23% -67%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
145 fps ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
95 fps ∼33% -34%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼53% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
203 fps ∼71% +40%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +98%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (145 - 200, n=5)
187 fps ∼65% +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=834)
48.7 fps ∼17% -66%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
110 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
58 fps ∼53% -47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼55% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼82% -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼54% -46%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (60 - 119, n=5)
81.8 fps ∼74% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 142, n=843)
32.5 fps ∼30% -70%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
96 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
89 fps ∼57% -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼68% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
122 fps ∼78% +27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (96 - 126, n=5)
109 fps ∼69% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=739)
28.9 fps ∼18% -70%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
90 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
56 fps ∼62% -38%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼67% -33%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (59 - 90, n=5)
65.8 fps ∼73% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 117, n=747)
23.8 fps ∼26% -74%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
65 fps ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
65 fps ∼65% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼56% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼86% +32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +54%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (65 - 85, n=5)
77.4 fps ∼77% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=602)
23.1 fps ∼23% -64%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
61 fps ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
36 fps ∼47% -41%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼95% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
77 fps ∼100% +26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼78% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (58 - 61, n=5)
59 fps ∼77% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=604)
20.6 fps ∼27% -66%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
17 fps ∼37% -50%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼57% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps ∼65% -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +35%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (22 - 34, n=5)
29.8 fps ∼65% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=366)
11.8 fps ∼26% -65%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
22 fps ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
18 fps ∼62% -18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼66% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼69% -9%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +32%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (20 - 23, n=5)
21.8 fps ∼75% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=364)
8.23 fps ∼28% -63%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
49 fps ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
27 fps ∼47% -45%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼69% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼81% -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼100% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (49 - 52, n=5)
50.8 fps ∼88% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=370)
17.6 fps ∼30% -64%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
43 fps ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
48 fps ∼64% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼65% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
54 (20min) fps ∼72% +26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +74%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (43 - 58, n=5)
53.4 fps ∼71% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=370)
20.1 fps ∼27% -53%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
38 fps ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
28 fps ∼44% -26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼65% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼79% +32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (38 - 51, n=5)
47.6 fps ∼76% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=527)
15.4 fps ∼24% -59%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
34 fps ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
18 fps ∼38% -47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼71% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
45 fps ∼94% +32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +41%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (34 - 45, n=5)
42 fps ∼88% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=531)
13.6 fps ∼28% -60%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
527820 Points ∼89%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼81% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
595466 Points ∼100% +13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
510245 Points ∼86% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (296746 - 527820, n=5)
469996 Points ∼79% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 624727, n=152)
325323 Points ∼55% -38%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
33.38 (8.52min - 83.34max) fps ∼39%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29.22 (4.07min - 95.16max) fps ∼34%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (84.1 - 85.6, n=2)
84.8 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=74)
19.1 fps ∼23%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
27.47 (12.07min - 47.94max) fps ∼52%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31.12 (11.09min - 63.1max) fps ∼59%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (42.3 - 63, n=2)
52.7 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=64)
16 fps ∼30%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
39.13 (10.62min - 99.35max) fps ∼55%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33.9 (9.36min - 74.72max) fps ∼47%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (71.5 - 71.6, n=2)
71.5 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=62)
19.9 fps ∼28%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4985 Score ∼70%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7156 Score ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4607 - 4957, n=3)
4783 Score ∼67%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=100)
2561 Score ∼36%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
1439 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
1374 Points ∼79% -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼84% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1514 Points ∼87% +5%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (1270 - 1439, n=5)
1351 Points ∼77% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 2169, n=764)
843 Points ∼48% -41%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10646 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
9092 Points ∼53% -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼59% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11567 Points ∼68% +9%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10646 - 10803, n=5)
10744 Points ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=764)
2615 Points ∼15% -75%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3811 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4646 Points ∼58% +22%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼77% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7945 Points ∼100% +108%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼30% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3775 - 4497, n=5)
4037 Points ∼51% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=764)
1976 Points ∼25% -48%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9024 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
7965 Points ∼56% -12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼66% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10002 Points ∼70% +11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8843 - 9478, n=5)
9209 Points ∼65% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=764)
3587 Points ∼25% -60%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4791 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4637 Points ∼76% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼89% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6072 Points ∼100% +27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼92% +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4764 - 4915, n=5)
4815 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6402, n=764)
1844 Points ∼30% -62%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +127%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼51% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
64.958 Points ∼50% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
56.788 Points ∼44%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.6 - 56.8, n=5)
53.8 Points ∼42% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226)
42.9 Points ∼33% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samung Browser 9.2)
42.69 Points ∼33% -25%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +214%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼38% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
115.43 Points ∼38% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
96.234 Points ∼32%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (89.3 - 96.2, n=5)
92.8 Points ∼31% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
84.48 Points ∼28% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659)
50.4 Points ∼17% -48%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
68.6 runs/min ∼45%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.8 - 64.4, n=4)
60.4 runs/min ∼39%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205)
45.2 runs/min ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
runs/min ∼0%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +77%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼66% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
118 Points ∼65% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
102 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
101 Points ∼56% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (86 - 102, n=5)
94.4 Points ∼52% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297)
71.1 Points ∼39% -30%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +151%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼48% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
22834 Points ∼46% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
19695 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
19135 Points ∼39% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (18094 - 20022, n=5)
19019 Points ∼39% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829)
8416 Points ∼17% -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855)
9488 ms * ∼100% -313%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
2527.8 ms * ∼27% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2294 - 2511, n=5)
2387 ms * ∼25% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
2295.8 ms * ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
2021.2 ms * ∼21% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼21% +15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼6% +75%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Note20 UltraSamsung Galaxy Note10+Huawei Mate 30 ProXiaomi Mi 10 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-7%
7%
13%
11%
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
55.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.47 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
69.22 (Nano Memory Card)
24%
61.8 (55.6 - 69.3, n=4)
11%
51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564)
-7%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
65.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
82.49 (Nano Memory Card)
26%
75.8 (65.6 - 85.8, n=4)
16%
69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564)
6%
Random Write 4KB
217.74
183.59
-16%
259.21
19%
258.54
19%
242 (205 - 285, n=8)
11%
40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935)
-82%
Random Read 4KB
186.67
196.22
5%
226.38
21%
264.9
42%
242 (187 - 325, n=8)
30%
63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935)
-66%
Sequential Write 256KB
802.09
588.06
-27%
401.79
-50%
750.44
-6%
825 (671 - 1321, n=8)
3%
139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935)
-83%
Sequential Read 256KB
1782.3
1503.7
-16%
1780.5
0%
1738.65
-2%
1702 (1348 - 2037, n=8)
-5%
363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935)
-80%
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.19.0: Ø39.8 (37-41)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 0.19.0: Ø39.8 (37-41)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.19.0: Ø39.9 (37-41)
; Dead Trigger 2; 1.6.9: Ø88 (57-118)
Max. terhelés
 32.9 °C33.1 °C30.8 °C 
 33.8 °C33.3 °C31.3 °C 
 32.5 °C33 °C30.7 °C 
Maximum: 33.8 °C
Átlag: 32.4 °C
29.1 °C30.7 °C30 °C
29.1 °C31.1 °C30.3 °C
28.8 °C30.7 °C30.7 °C
Maximum: 31.1 °C
Átlag: 30.1 °C
Tápegység (max.)  25.8 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.923.3252923.73121.927.44022225029.935.36322288019.330.710016.331.31251440.316016.956.120014.954.625014.158.63151066.74001165.750011.766.763010.969.480011.972.310001176.4125010.276.8160011.477.8200012.879250012.979315012.578.440001378.5500013.175.8630013.475.3800015.776.11000013.573.5125001470.31600013.763.9SPL24.888.8N0.677.4median 13median 72.3Delta1.18.332.239.436.225.529.126.83027.742.342.426.827.220.325.22536.717.244.817.954.317.153.817.95316.253.616.55615.35915.664.415.664.814.867.214.472.314.67314.776.914.176.414.476.914.475.914.973.514.773.814.57214.866.6156316.649.427.185.80.961median 15median 64.81.29.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Note20 UltraApple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.01 / 0.24 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.65 / 1.06 / 1.49 Watt
Terhelés midlight 4.91 / 10.29 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
4300 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-31%
-13%
9%
-49%
-22%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
0.65
0.7
-8%
0.87
-34%
0.61
6%
0.92
-42%
0.846 (0.65 - 1, n=5)
-30%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=926)
-37%
Idle Average *
1.06
1.81
-71%
1.75
-65%
1.19
-12%
2.9
-174%
1.534 (1.06 - 1.91, n=5)
-45%
1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=925)
-66%
Idle Maximum *
1.49
1.92
-29%
1.83
-23%
1.23
17%
2.94
-97%
1.858 (1.49 - 2.3, n=5)
-25%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=926)
-37%
Load Average *
4.91
7.57
-54%
3.85
22%
4.18
15%
3.65
26%
5.14 (4.72 - 5.8, n=5)
-5%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=920)
16%
Load Maximum *
10.29
9.34
9%
6.64
35%
8.53
17%
6.18
40%
10.7 (9.99 - 11.8, n=5)
-4%
6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=920)
40%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
20h 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 84)
10h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 33min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
5h 38min
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
4300 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
21%
16%
53%
Reader / Idle
1223
1585
30%
2174
78%
2133
74%
2618
114%
H.264
993
934
-6%
1098
11%
973
-2%
1346
36%
WiFi v1.3
644
532
-17%
823
28%
865
34%
909
41%
Load
338
305
-10%
219
-35%
198
-41%
408
21%

Pro

+ szuper-világos OLED kijelző HDR10-zel
+ jó hangszórók
+ S Pen toll
+ erős hármas kamerarendszer
+ bővíthető tárhely
+ Wi-Fi 6, 5G és eSIM
+ IP68 tanúsítvány

Kontra

- lassú microSD
- 120 Hz csak Full HD-ban
- sem aptX HD, sem pedig aptX Adaptive
- SoC szabályzat

Összegzés - Nehéz választás

In review: Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra. Review device provided by Samsung Germany.
In review: Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra. Review device provided by Samsung Germany.

A tesztelés idején a Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra az egyik legjobb okostelefon a piacon. A phablet nagyon világos AMOLED kijelzővel, nagy rendszersebességgel, jó és sokoldalú kamerával, megnyerő hangszórókkal és díszes dizájnnal ragyog a tesztben. É akkor ott van az S Pen toll, egy nagyon érett termék számos nagyszerű funkcióval.

A Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra egy meglehetősen teljes csomagot kínál, a három éves frissítés pedig hosszú élettartamot garantál.

Apróbb hibákat találhatunk, ha megszemléljük a részleteket; ezek közé tartozik mindenekelőtt a különbözp SoC-k dilemmája, amitől egyszerűen rossz szájízünk lesz. Nem csak a teljesítmény gyengébb az Exynos SoC-vel, hanem az energiahatékonyság is, és az 5G-nek mmWave támogatás nélkül kell beérnie. A kijelző is egy kicsivel pontosabban kalibrált lehetne; bár ez szabad szemmel szinte észrevétlen, de meggátolja, hogy jobb értékelést adjunk a kijelzőnek. Emellett azt is elvártuk volna egy csúcskategóriás terméktől, hogy a panel 120 Hz-es módja QHD+ felbontásban is működjön.

A Note szerelmesei különben sem fogják tudni megkerülni a Galaxy Note20 Ultra-t, viszont különösen a tavalyi verzió tulajdonosait nem fogja sok minden arra ösztönözni, hogy cseréljenek, mivel a Samsung egyes részleteken egyáltalán nem javított. Azok a felhasználók, akiknek nem okoz gondot a magas ár, egy nagyszerű okostelefont fognak kapni.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra - 09/03/2020 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Váz
96%
Billentyűzet
68 / 75 → 90%
Érintőpad
98%
Csatlakoztathatóság
70 / 70 → 100%
Súly
88%
Akkumulátor
89%
Kijelző
88%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
57 / 64 → 88%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
80 / 86 → 93%
Hőmérséklet
94%
Zaj
100%
Audio
83 / 90 → 92%
Camera
80%
Átlag
84%
89%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra rövid értékelés - Egy okostelefon erőteljes funkciókkal és S Pen tollal
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-12-22 (Update: 2020-12-22)