C 2018
Notebookcheck

Razer Blade 15 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, FHD) Laptop rövid értékelés

Sebastian Jentsch, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Tanja Hinum (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 07/06/2018
Coffee Lake Gaming Laptop / Notebook

Stréber. A felső kategóriás, 14 colos Blade utódjaként a Razer egy új, kompakt gamer notebookot alkotott, 15 colos keskeny peremű kijelzővel. Cikkünkből kiderül, hogy miként teljesít a karcsú gamer notebook a riválisokkal szemben.

Razer Blade 15 models
Razer Blade 15 models
Razer Blade 15 2018 (Blade Széria)
Processzor
Intel Core i7-8750H
Grafikus adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Mag: 1215 MHz, Memória: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 389.04, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, minden hely foglalt, max. 32 GB
Kijelző
15.6 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, multitouch, LGD05C0, IPS, FHD, 144 Hz, fényes: nem
Alaplap
Intel HM370
Háttértár
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, 512 GB 
, SSD foglalatok: 1x M.2 Type 2280
Hangkártya
Realtek ALC298 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Csatlakozók
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington zár, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm-es kombinált audio jack
Hálózat
Intel Wireless-AC 9260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 17.3 x 355 x 235
Akkumulátor
80 Wh, 5209 mAh Lítium-Polimer
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webkamera: 1 MP (720p)
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: 2.0 (Dolby Atmos), Billentyűzet: chiclet RGB, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, 230 wattos hálózati adapter, törlőkendő, kézikönyv, Razer Synapse, Razer Chroma, 12 Hónap Garancia
Súly
2.056 kg, Tápegység: 670 g
Ár
2650 EUR
Hivatkozások
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

left: power, 2x USB-A 3.0, audio combo jack
left: power, 2x USB-A 3.0, audio combo jack
right: Thunderbolt 3, USB-A 3.0, HDMI 2.0, MiniDisplayPort 1.4, Kensington lock
right: Thunderbolt 3, USB-A 3.0, HDMI 2.0, MiniDisplayPort 1.4, Kensington lock
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
685 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
682 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
681 MBit/s ∼99%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
660 MBit/s ∼96% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=169)
594 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
677 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼98% +3%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
643 MBit/s ∼95%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
585 MBit/s ∼86% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=169)
530 MBit/s ∼78% -18%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
379 MBit/s ∼56% -41%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
286
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
251
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 307 cd/m² Átlag: 281.4 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 82 %
Centrumban: 290 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 967:1 (Fekete: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.85 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 1.39
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
94% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
Razer Blade 15 2018
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
5%
-5%
10%
38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17.2 (8.8, 8.4)
16.8 (8.4, 8.4)
2%
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
-2%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
12%
6.6 (3.4, 3.2)
62%
Response Time Black / White *
12 (6.8, 5.2)
11.2 (6, 5.2)
7%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-7%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
7%
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
13%
PWM Frequency
Screen
19%
7%
1%
-30%
Brightness middle
290
313
8%
254
-12%
309
7%
307
6%
Brightness
281
300
7%
262
-7%
291
4%
296
5%
Brightness Distribution
82
78
-5%
89
9%
91
11%
89
9%
Black Level *
0.3
0.33
-10%
0.22
27%
0.31
-3%
0.25
17%
Contrast
967
948
-2%
1155
19%
997
3%
1228
27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.85
1.29
55%
2.37
17%
2.96
-4%
5.74
-101%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.27
2.04
67%
4.71
25%
5.14
18%
11.32
-81%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.39
1.84
-32%
1.41
-1%
1.94
-40%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
0.69
71%
1.58
34%
2.88
-20%
6.44
-168%
Gamma
2.34 94%
2.43 91%
2.48 89%
2.33 94%
2.48 89%
CCT
6718 97%
6550 99%
6785 96%
6725 97%
8395 77%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
60
0%
60
0%
60
0%
60
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
94
0%
92
-2%
93
-1%
93
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
12% / 17%
1% / 5%
6% / 3%
4% / -19%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.8 ms rise
↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8689 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼100% +2%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼100% +2%
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Core i7-8750H
172 Points ∼98%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points ∼97% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 207, n=407)
151 Points ∼86% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
1168 Points ∼100% +19%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1133 Points ∼97% +15%
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
1103 Points ∼94% +12%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
1053 Points ∼90% +7%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Core i7-8750H
983 Points ∼84%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1408, n=408)
738 Points ∼63% -25%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
2 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points ∼99% +2%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.95 Points ∼98%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points ∼96% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.34, n=403)
1.676 Points ∼84% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
13.29 Points ∼100% +26%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.93 Points ∼97% +23%
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.55 Points ∼94% +19%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.82 Points ∼89% +12%
Razer Blade 15 2018
Intel Core i7-8750H
10.51 Points ∼79%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 15.8, n=504)
7.21 Points ∼54% -31%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.95 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
10.51 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
172 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
983 Points
Segítség
PCMark 10 - Score
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB
5213 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5194 Points ∼100% +3%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5095 Points ∼98% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5059 Points ∼97% 0%
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5046 Points ∼97%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6620, n=109)
4924 Points ∼94% -2%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB
5687 Points ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5676 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5662 Points ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5637 Points ∼99%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5621 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=304)
4912 Points ∼86% -13%
Home Score Accelerated v2
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4665 Points ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4658 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4627 Points ∼99% -1%
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB
4510 Points ∼97% -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4504 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=322)
4214 Points ∼90% -10%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4658 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5637 pontok
Segítség
Razer Blade 15 2018
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
AS SSD
-28%
4%
29%
-4%
Score Total
3806
2536
-33%
4122
8%
4701
24%
3649
-4%
Score Write
1450
939
-35%
2051
41%
2200
52%
1446
0%
Score Read
1584
1092
-31%
1346
-15%
1661
5%
1471
-7%
4K Write
93.55
80.44
-14%
107.15
15%
131.9
41%
90.23
-4%
4K Read
46.45
23.36
-50%
48.94
5%
53.59
15%
43.42
-7%
Seq Write
1520.94
1163.11
-24%
1834.04
21%
2325.46
53%
1580.23
4%
Seq Read
2375.98
2212.97
-7%
1266.1
-47%
2685.36
13%
2090.99
-12%
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3280 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1527 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 342.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 296.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1371 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1483 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 39.23 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 94.15 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17046 Points ∼100% +8%
Razer Blade 15 2018
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
15748 Points ∼92%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
15156 Points ∼89% -4%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14780 Points ∼87% -6%
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14146 Points ∼83% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=436)
10245 Points ∼60% -35%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
21925 Points ∼100% +10%
Razer Blade 15 2018
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
19969 Points ∼91%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
19162 Points ∼87% -4%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18687 Points ∼85% -6%
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
17680 Points ∼81% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=509)
11830 Points ∼54% -41%
3DMark 11 Performance
14676 pontok
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
26862 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score
12707 pontok
Segítség
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
59.4 fps ∼100% +11%
Razer Blade 15 2018
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
53.5 fps ∼90%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
52.7 fps ∼89% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
52.4 fps ∼88% -2%
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
50.2 fps ∼85% -6%
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
49.8 fps ∼84% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=211)
44.9 fps ∼76% -16%
alacsony közepes magas ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 99.453.5fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 142117fps
Rocket League (2017) 196fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 12084.6fps
F1 2017 (2017) 11279fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 9171fps
The Evil Within 2 (2017) 51.550.5fps
ELEX (2017) 94.173fps
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) 97.491.8fps
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 11094fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 70.253.3fps

Zajszint

Üresjárat
29 / 30 / 38 dB(A)
Terhelés
46 / 46 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
csendes
40 dB(A)
hallható
50 dB(A)
hangos
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Razer Blade 15 2018
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-4%
4%
-5%
-2%
-1%
off / environment *
29
29
-0%
30
-3%
30
-3%
29
-0%
29.5 (27.7 - 32, n=216)
-2%
Idle Minimum *
29
30
-3%
30
-3%
31
-7%
30
-3%
31.6 (28 - 41.7, n=637)
-9%
Idle Average *
30
31
-3%
31
-3%
37
-23%
31
-3%
32.8 (28 - 46.6, n=637)
-9%
Idle Maximum *
38
35
8%
34
11%
43
-13%
33
13%
34.7 (28 - 50.4, n=637)
9%
Load Average *
46
49
-7%
43
7%
45
2%
49
-7%
40.4 (30.3 - 58, n=638)
12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
51
-4%
42
14%
46
6%
50
-2%
Load Maximum *
46
54
-17%
44
4%
46
-0%
52
-13%
47.7 (38.9 - 64, n=638)
-4%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highshearing rangehide median
Max. terhelés
 52 °C56 °C54 °C 
 48 °C52 °C45 °C 
 43 °C43 °C42 °C 
Maximum: 56 °C
Átlag: 48.3 °C
55 °C59 °C50 °C
52 °C52 °C47 °C
47 °C47 °C44 °C
Maximum: 59 °C
Átlag: 50.3 °C
Tápegység (max.)  44 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Razer Blade 15 2018
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
7%
15%
-2%
10%
13%
Maximum Upper Side *
56
53
5%
49
12%
57
-2%
52
7%
45.5 (28 - 68.8, n=602)
19%
Maximum Bottom *
59
65
-10%
63
-7%
65
-10%
49
17%
49.1 (25.9 - 78, n=600)
17%
Idle Upper Side *
33
26
21%
24
27%
33
-0%
31
6%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=553)
7%
Idle Bottom *
34
30
12%
25
26%
33
3%
31
9%
31.6 (21.1 - 50.3, n=551)
7%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.241.72536.134.23129.632.54033.333.35026.430.56326.131.18024.937.910024.240.712522.34116021.448.120021.754.825022.257.231520.558.340018.962.950018.865.263017.763.980017.470.1100017.273.8125016.874.1160017.173.620001772.125001770315017.267.9400017.265.1500017.262.1630017.261.4800017.255.71000017.2511250017.147.5160001740.3SPL29.681.8N1.347.5median 17.2median 62.1Delta1.9939.144.635.64028.430.433.537.726.428.525.527.429.23028.932.324.532.921.141.520.748.520.955.919.561.218.465.118.366.417.567.61867.918.665.317.469.216.765.817.264.517.365.917.26817.257.317.256.417.261.117.36617.262.217.259.61754.129.777.51.342.2median 17.4median 62.21.86.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade 15 2018Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade 15 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.1 / 0.1 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 14 / 17 / 21 Watt
Terhelés midlight 95 / 179 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Razer Blade 15 2018
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-1%
15%
1%
-17%
-30%
Idle Minimum *
14
14
-0%
7
50%
14
-0%
16
-14%
20.3 (3.9 - 113, n=597)
-45%
Idle Average *
17
18
-6%
11
35%
17
-0%
19
-12%
25.9 (6.8 - 119, n=597)
-52%
Idle Maximum *
21
22
-5%
20
5%
22
-5%
26
-24%
30.9 (8.3 - 122, n=597)
-47%
Load Average *
95
91
4%
98
-3%
102
-7%
103
-8%
105 (14.1 - 319, n=588)
-11%
Load Maximum *
179
173
3%
182
-2%
157
12%
223
-25%
166 (21.9 - 590, n=587)
7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
141
142
-1%
132
6%
130
8%
164
-16%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
6h 22min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 24min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
1h 12min
Razer Blade 15 2018
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Schenker Key 15 Coffee Lake
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 55 Wh
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 55 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
83%
17%
-10%
-35%
-13%
Reader / Idle
382
762
99%
507
33%
301
-21%
237
-38%
328 (39 - 1174, n=586)
-14%
H.264
324
504
56%
356
10%
159
-51%
244 (88 - 506, n=121)
-25%
WiFi v1.3
322
513
59%
362
12%
220
-32%
164
-49%
250 (78 - 622, n=262)
-22%
Load
72
156
117%
81
13%
89
24%
70
-3%
78.6 (18 - 202, n=554)
9%

Pro

+ méretéhez képest lenyűgöző teljesítmény
+ vékony, könnyű, robusztus ház
+ átgondolt csatlakozóelhelyezkedés
+ kiváló anyaghasználat
+ elég jó beviteli eszközök
+ keskeny kijelzőkeretek
+ jól kivitelezett ház
+ RGB háttérvilágítás
+ hasznos segédeszközök
+ stílusos design
+ 144 Hz-es panel
+ NVMe SSD

Kontra

- a Razer szoftverének használata regisztrációhoz kötött
- a Max-Q designhoz képest nagyon hangos
- a felülete könnyen koszolódik
- nincs kártyaolvasó, sem RJ45
- 12 hónap jótállás
- melegszik
- csak egy M.2 slot
Razer Blade 15. Review unit courtesy of Razer Germany.
Razer Blade 15. Review unit courtesy of Razer Germany.

A Razer Blade 15 egyike a jelenlegi legjobb gamer notebookoknak.

A stílusos, strapabíró és elegáns ház mellett a Clevo P955ER barebone-ok (Schenker Key 15Eurocom Q6), és az MSI GS65 Stealth Thin is szégyenben marad. Csak a Gigabyte Aero 15X ér a nyomába design és minőség terén.

A két készülék fej-fej mellett haladt a legtöbb dologban, de végül a Gigabyte győzedelmeskedett, hosszabb üzemidejének köszönhetően, és így helyet foglalhatott a Top 10-es listánkon. Ezt leszámítva a Blade 15 majdnem tökéletesen egy szinten volt a 15X-szel - a kimaradt kártyaolvasót és Ethernet portot leszámítva - akár a beviteli eszközöket (RGB-háttérvilágított billentyűzet), akár a kijelzőt (144 Hz), hő- és zajkibocsátást, vagy teljesítményt nézzük.

Core i7-8750HGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, és NVMe SSD kombinációja ideális a megszokott alkalmazásokhoz és minden mai játékhoz, bár a Blade 15 nagyon forró és zajos terhelés alatt.

Mindent egybevetve, a Blade 15 egyértelműen megérdemli az ajánlásunkat, magas ára ellenére is. Akik sokat utaznak, és az adaptert szívesebben hagyják a táskájukban, azok számára a Gigabyte Aero 15X megfelelőbb lehet.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Razer Blade 15 2018 - 06/27/2018 v6
Sebastian Jentsch

Váz
90 / 98 → 91%
Billentyűzet
81%
Érintőpad
88%
Csatlakoztathatóság
65 / 81 → 80%
Súly
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Akkumulátor
83%
Kijelző
89%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
95%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
97%
Hőmérséklet
72 / 95 → 76%
Zaj
76 / 90 → 84%
Audio
68%
Átlag
80%
87%
Gaming - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Razer Blade 15 2018
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Razer Blade 15 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, FHD) Laptop rövid értékelés
Sebastian Jentsch, 2018-07- 6 (Update: 2018-07- 6)