Notebookcheck

Nokia 5.3 Smartphone rövid értékelés: Vékony Android One mobiltelefon

Egy kameragyűrű. A Nokia 5.3 négyes kamerát kínál, valamint egy nagy kijelzőt és egy hosszú üzemidejű akkumulátort aránylag kevés pénzért. De az árkategóriájában szoros a verseny.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (fordította Zoltán Kiss),
Android ARM Smartphone
Nokia 5.3
Nokia 5.3 (5 Széria)
Processzor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Memória
4096 MB 
Kijelző
6.55 hüvelyk 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 268 PPI, Kapacitív, IPS, 60 Hz
Háttértár
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 48 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5mm, Kártyaolvasó: microSD 512 GB-ig, dedikált, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: Gyorsulásmérő, Közelségérzékelő
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 8.5 x 164.3 x 76.6
Akkumulátor
4000 mAh Lítium-Polimer
Operációs rendszer
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.8, fázis-különbség AF, LED vaku, videók @1080p/30fps (kamera 1); 5.0MP, széles látószögű lencse (kamera 2), 2.0MP, makró lencse (kamera 3), 2.0MP, mélységélesség (kamera 4)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: Monó hangszóró az alsó szélen, Billentyűzet: Virtuális, Töltő, USB kábel, headset, SIM-kiadó eszköz, 24 Hónap Garancia, LTE Cat-4 (150Mbps/​50Mbps), UKW Rádió, fanless
Súly
185 g, Tápegység: 63 g
Ár
199 Euró
Hivatkozások
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Vergleichsgeräte

Bewertung
Rating Version
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
76 %7
07/2020
Nokia 5.3
SD 665, Adreno 610
185 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.55"1600x720
81 %7
07/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
77 %7
12/2019
Huawei P smart Pro
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
206 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.59"2340x1080
78 %7
01/2020
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
SD 665, Adreno 610
188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2280x1080
Nokia 5.3
Nokia 5.3
Nokia 5.3
Nokia 5.3
Nokia 5.3
Nokia 5.3
Nokia 5.3

Size comparison

165.8 mm 76.7 mm 8.8 mm 209 g164.3 mm 76.6 mm 8.5 mm 185 g163.1 mm 77.2 mm 8.8 mm 206 g158.4 mm 75.8 mm 9.1 mm 188 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
286 (min: 225, max: 321) MBit/s ∼100% +97%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
182 (min: 11, max: 259) MBit/s ∼64% +26%
Nokia 5.3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
145 (min: 20, max: 215) MBit/s ∼51%
Huawei P smart Pro
802.11 b/g/n
42.4 MBit/s ∼15% -71%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
256 (min: 247, max: 263) MBit/s ∼100% +57%
Nokia 5.3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
163 (min: 25, max: 258) MBit/s ∼64%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
152 (min: 1, max: 254) MBit/s ∼59% -7%
Huawei P smart Pro
802.11 b/g/n
51.5 (min: 19, max: 90) MBit/s ∼20% -68%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø145 (20-215)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø163 (25-258)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker
29.8 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
65.8 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
92.1 ∆E
70.7 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
24 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia 5.3: 46.8 ∆E min: 13.55 - max: 92.11 ∆E
ColorChecker
19.3 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
14 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia 5.3: 10.95 ∆E min: 3.33 - max: 21.07 ∆E
477
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 523 cd/m² Átlag: 482.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.58 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 86 %
Centrumban: 523 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1137:1 (Fekete: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.22 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 8 | 0.64-98 Ø6
94.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.226
Nokia 5.3
IPS, 1600x720, 6.55
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Huawei P smart Pro
TFT-LCD (LTPS), 2340x1080, 6.59
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3
Response Times
21%
8%
28%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
56 (28, 28)
44 (21, 23)
21%
51.2 (21.2, 30)
9%
36 (17, 19)
36%
Response Time Black / White *
30 (15, 15)
24 (9, 15)
20%
28 (10, 18)
7%
24 (9, 15)
20%
PWM Frequency
463 (20)
Screen
18%
-3%
11%
Brightness middle
523
622
19%
480
-8%
597
14%
Brightness
482
612
27%
459
-5%
596
24%
Brightness Distribution
86
94
9%
87
1%
93
8%
Black Level *
0.46
0.56
-22%
0.47
-2%
0.52
-13%
Contrast
1137
1111
-2%
1021
-10%
1148
1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.22
3.98
36%
5.7
8%
5.93
5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.56
7.33
31%
11.3
-7%
9.42
11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8
4.5
44%
7.8
2%
5.3
34%
Gamma
2.226 99%
2.206 100%
2.27 97%
2.232 99%
CCT
8856 73%
7361 88%
8813 74%
7632 85%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
114.9
Total Average (Program / Settings)
20% / 18%
3% / -1%
20% / 14%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 28 ms rise
↘ 28 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17927 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1350 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points ∼85% +25%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1356 Points ∼68% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1256 - 1390, n=6)
1337 Points ∼67% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (445 - 3531, n=90)
1990 Points ∼100% +47%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
312 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
559 Points ∼98% +79%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
330 Points ∼58% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (309 - 313, n=6)
311 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=90)
568 Points ∼100% +82%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6775 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7673 Points ∼100% +13%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6993 Points ∼91% +3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6534 Points ∼85% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6396 - 11432, n=9)
7235 Points ∼94% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=491)
5840 Points ∼76% -14%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8538 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9027 Points ∼92% +6%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
9854 Points ∼100% +15%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8186 Points ∼83% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7446 - 9051, n=8)
8327 Points ∼85% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=649)
6378 Points ∼65% -25%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2409 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3256 Points ∼100% +35%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2478 Points ∼76% +3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2341 Points ∼72% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2154 - 2488, n=9)
2359 Points ∼72% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=497)
2178 Points ∼67% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
999 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2551 Points ∼100% +155%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
875 Points ∼34% -12%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
981 Points ∼38% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (980 - 999, n=9)
988 Points ∼39% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=497)
2077 Points ∼81% +108%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1148 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2680 Points ∼100% +133%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
991 Points ∼37% -14%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1126 Points ∼42% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1097 - 1151, n=9)
1134 Points ∼42% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=498)
1929 Points ∼72% +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2396 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3267 Points ∼100% +36%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2496 Points ∼76% +4%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2393 Points ∼73% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2199 - 2493, n=9)
2362 Points ∼72% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=527)
2087 Points ∼64% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1692 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3803 Points ∼100% +125%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1342 Points ∼35% -21%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1670 Points ∼44% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1653 - 1692, n=9)
1671 Points ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=527)
2766 Points ∼73% +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1810 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3669 Points ∼100% +103%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1508 Points ∼41% -17%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1790 Points ∼49% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1765 - 1810, n=9)
1788 Points ∼49% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=527)
2325 Points ∼63% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2476 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3152 Points ∼100% +27%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2456 Points ∼78% -1%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2424 Points ∼77% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2246 - 2493, n=9)
2422 Points ∼77% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=577)
2064 Points ∼65% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
999 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2369 Points ∼100% +137%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
845 Points ∼36% -15%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
979 Points ∼41% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (927 - 999, n=9)
966 Points ∼41% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=577)
1737 Points ∼73% +74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1152 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2507 Points ∼100% +118%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
999 Points ∼40% -13%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1128 Points ∼45% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1076 - 1152, n=9)
1116 Points ∼45% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7323, n=578)
1660 Points ∼66% +44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2482 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3070 Points ∼100% +24%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2487 Points ∼81% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2452 Points ∼80% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2282 - 2507, n=9)
2420 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=619)
1927 Points ∼63% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1663 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points ∼100% +119%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1335 Points ∼37% -20%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1634 Points ∼45% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1564 - 1663, n=9)
1622 Points ∼44% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=618)
2281 Points ∼63% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1795 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3501 Points ∼100% +95%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1489 Points ∼43% -17%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1765 Points ∼50% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1675 - 1795, n=9)
1749 Points ∼50% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=621)
1965 Points ∼56% +9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20320 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20019 Points ∼89% -1%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
22398 Points ∼100% +10%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18698 Points ∼83% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (17865 - 24652, n=9)
21015 Points ∼94% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=767)
15269 Points ∼68% -25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15403 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
52700 Points ∼100% +242%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2177 Points ∼4% -86%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24992 Points ∼47% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15403 - 25219, n=9)
23806 Points ∼45% +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=765)
25945 Points ∼49% +68%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24065 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38671 Points ∼100% +61%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
21876 Points ∼57% -9%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23253 Points ∼60% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (22445 - 25046, n=9)
23862 Points ∼62% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=765)
20395 Points ∼53% -15%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.8 fps ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼98% +25%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2.3 fps ∼21% -74%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.5 fps ∼40% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (4 - 9.1, n=9)
5.99 fps ∼53% -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=290)
11.2 fps ∼100% +27%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7 fps ∼87% +150%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
4 fps ∼50% +43%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼35% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.7 - 2.8, n=9)
2.79 fps ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=288)
8.03 fps ∼100% +187%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
14 fps ∼82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +21%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.1 fps ∼36% -56%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps ∼45% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.2 - 15, n=9)
9.84 fps ∼58% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=294)
16.6 fps ∼98% +19%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.3 fps ∼43%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7 fps ∼36% -16%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.2 fps ∼42% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7.8 - 8.4, n=9)
8.14 fps ∼42% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=293)
19.3 fps ∼100% +133%
Nokia 5.3Xiaomi Redmi Note 9SHuawei P smart ProMotorola Moto G8 PlusAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
40%
76%
17%
-22%
-24%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
54.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
68.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
14%
52.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
57.6 (11.2 - 74.7, n=121)
-5%
50.7 (1.7 - 87.1, n=509)
-16%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
77.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
74.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
76.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
72.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
76.6 (21.1 - 87.2, n=121)
-1%
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=509)
-11%
Random Write 4KB
45.2
123.6
173%
156.34
246%
124.9
176%
27 (3.4 - 133, n=138)
-40%
33.2 (0.14 - 319, n=857)
-27%
Random Read 4KB
109.1
137
26%
154.29
41%
59.9
-45%
56.3 (11.4 - 149, n=138)
-48%
57.2 (1.59 - 324, n=857)
-48%
Sequential Write 256KB
243.2
214.8
-12%
195.43
-20%
217.4
-11%
174 (40 - 254, n=138)
-28%
122 (2.99 - 911, n=857)
-50%
Sequential Read 256KB
299.5
496.6
66%
821.6
174%
302.5
1%
274 (95.6 - 704, n=138)
-9%
330 (12.1 - 1802, n=857)
10%
Max. terhelés
 51.7 °C46.7 °C41.9 °C 
 50.3 °C44.4 °C42 °C 
 48.7 °C44.8 °C42 °C 
Maximum: 51.7 °C
Átlag: 45.8 °C
39.9 °C45.9 °C51.1 °C
40.5 °C46.1 °C49.9 °C
41.4 °C46.2 °C50.7 °C
Maximum: 51.1 °C
Átlag: 45.7 °C
Tápegység (max.)  42.6 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.7 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.1 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.4362539.736.7312827.74027.429.55029.835.86325.832.28022.223.610023.422.412521.222.316019.224.820018.931.22501937.831517.242.24001647.350016.755.863018.856.880014.763.8100015.669.212501467160013.966.7200014.462.9250014.761.7315014.359.340001558500015.764.9630015.865.2800015.764.71000016.255.61250015.750.51600015.940.4SPL71.86327.676.1N26.315134.9median 15.8median 56.8Delta1.911.832.430.53531.927.126.4262730.431.225.228.822.722.525.522.120.124.719.235.417.839.417.845.916.149.916.655.715.962.514.365.514.770.414.873.614.37114.165.116.369.114.472.313.868.713.970.414.264.414.559.114.666.41568.115.359.115.751.660.964.571.226.98113.817.725.60.948.4median 15median 64.41.610.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia 5.3Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia 5.3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Nokia 5.3
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
Huawei P smart Pro
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
4000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
876
1187
36%
757
-14%
980
12%
690 (223 - 2636, n=724)
-21%
Akkumulátor üzemidő
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 36min

Pro

+ aránylag vékony és könnyű
+ naprakész szoftver
+ jó üzemidő
+ dedikált microSD olvasó
+ rugalmas kamera rendszer...

Kontra

- ...középszerű minőséggel
- túlzott hőtermelés terhelés alatt
- csak eMMC Flash
- ingadozó adatátviteli sebességek WLAN-ban
- erősen kékes árnyalatú kijelző

Összegzés - Túl keveset nyújt

Nokia 5.3 Smartphone rövid értékelés, test device provided by Nokia Germany.
Nokia 5.3 Smartphone rövid értékelés, test device provided by Nokia Germany.

Kissé úgy tűnik, hogy a Nokia 5.3 egy év késésben van. Tavaly dicséretet érdemelt volna az aránylag nagy akkumulátor, a rugalmas kamera rendszer és a kategóriájához képest jó teljesítmény miatt. 2020-ban viszont 200 euróért ez túl kevés, ha a versenytársakkal összehasonlítjuk, és olyan hibákat ejt, amelyeket még egy 200 eurós készülékkel szemben sem igazán tudunk eltűrni.

Nagyon felforrósodik hosszabb terhelés alatt, még szobahőmérsékleten is. A változó WLAN adatátviteli sebességek és a lassú LTE szintén gond. És a képernyő erősen kékes árnyalatú, aminek 2020-ban már igazán semmi keresnivalója.

A Nokia 5.3-nak van néhány gyenge pontja, ezért jelentősen alulmarad a hasonló árú versenytársakkal szemben.

Igen, a Nokia 5.3 meglehetősen könnyű és vékony, jó futási idővel, és az ereje is elegendő az egyszerű mindennapi használatra. A szoftver naprakész, és a frissítések terén be vagyunk biztosítva az elkövetkező két évre az Android One-nak köszönhetően. De mivel a kamera összességében szintén nem valami meggyőző, és egyszerűen olyan sok jobb ajánlat létezik más gyártóktól, ezért nehezünkre esik ajánlani a Nokia telefont.

Legfeljebb akkor lehetne megfelelő az igénytelenebb felhasználók számára, ha a telefon gyorsan elérhetővé válik jóval alacsonyabb áron.

Nokia 5.3 - 07/02/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Váz
76%
Billentyűzet
65 / 75 → 87%
Érintőpad
94%
Csatlakoztathatóság
43 / 70 → 62%
Súly
89%
Akkumulátor
90%
Kijelző
82%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
15 / 64 → 23%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
64 / 86 → 75%
Hőmérséklet
78%
Zaj
100%
Audio
62 / 90 → 69%
Camera
44%
Átlag
70%
76%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Nokia 5.3 Smartphone rövid értékelés: Vékony Android One mobiltelefon
Florian Schmitt, 2020-07-22 (Update: 2020-07-22)