Notebookcheck

Motorola Moto E6s Smartphone rövid értékelés - Mobiltelefon Kevés Pénzért

Könnyed napkelte. A Motorola Moto E6s színátmenet hatásokkal és dupla kamerával akarja magára vonni a figyelmet. A 100 euró körüli ár rendkívül versenyképes. Képes-e a Motorola olcsó okostelefonja kitűnni a mezőnyből?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (fordította Zoltán Kiss),
Android ARM Smartphone
Motorola Moto E6s
Motorola Moto E6s (Moto E Széria)
Processzor
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafikus adapter
PowerVR GE8320
Memória
2048 MB 
Kijelző
6.1 hüvelyk 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, Kapacitív, IPS, fényes: igen, 60 Hz
Háttértár
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 24 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3,5mm-Audioport, Kártyaolvasó: microSD 256 GB-ig, dedikált, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, Szenzorok: Gyorsulásmérő, Közelségérzékelő
Hálózat
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B18/​B20/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 8.5 x 155.6 x 73
Akkumulátor
3000 mAh Lítium-Polimer
Operációs rendszer
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, Fázis-különbség AF, LED vaku, videók @1080p/30fps (kamera 1); 2.0MP, f/2.4, mélységélesség (kamera 2)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.2, Videos @1080p/​30fps
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: Monó hangszórók a hátoldalon, Billentyűzet: Virtuális, Töltő, USB kábel, 24 Hónap Garancia, FM rádio, notifikációs LED, SAR érték: 0.455 W/kg (fej), 1.558 W/kg (test), fanless
Súly
160 g, Tápegység: 49 g
Ár
99 Euró
Hivatkozások
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Vergleichsgeräte

Bewertung
Rating Version
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
75 %7
07/2020
Motorola Moto E6s
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
160 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.1"1560x720
74 %7
12/2019
Nokia 2.3
Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300
183 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.2"1520x720
75 %7
01/2020
Huawei Y6s
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300
150 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.09"1560x720
75 %7
11/2019
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
SD 439, Adreno 505
188 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.22"1520x720

Size Comparison

157.69 mm 75.41 mm 8.68 mm 183 g156.5 mm 75.4 mm 9.4 mm 188 g156.3 mm 73.5 mm 8 mm 150 g155.6 mm 73 mm 8.5 mm 160 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 2.3
802.11 b/g/n
70.6 (min: 53, max: 109) MBit/s ∼100% +64%
Huawei Y6s
802.11 b/g/n
58.3 (min: 55, max: 61) MBit/s ∼83% +36%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
802.11 b/g/n
56 (min: 54, max: 58) MBit/s ∼79% +30%
Motorola Moto E6s
802.11 b/g/n
43 (min: 26, max: 61) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 2.3
802.11 b/g/n
61.3 (min: 10, max: 110) MBit/s ∼100% +73%
Huawei Y6s
802.11 b/g/n
55.8 (min: 53, max: 65) MBit/s ∼91% +58%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
802.11 b/g/n
55.3 (min: 49, max: 60) MBit/s ∼90% +56%
Motorola Moto E6s
802.11 b/g/n
35.4 (min: 5, max: 57) MBit/s ∼58%
010203040506070Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø42.7 (26-61)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø36.6 (5-57)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
60 ∆E
51.3 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
40.7 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
61.3 ∆E
62.3 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
34.9 ∆E
72.6 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
77.8 ∆E
68.3 ∆E
50.6 ∆E
36 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto E6s: 44.34 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 77.84 ∆E
ColorChecker
15.5 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
12 ∆E
9 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
4 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto E6s: 9.99 ∆E min: 2.44 - max: 15.53 ∆E
473
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 494 cd/m² Átlag: 481.1 cd/m² Minimum: 7.86 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 95 %
Centrumban: 488 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1952:1 (Fekete: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.02 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6
93.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.252
Motorola Moto E6s
IPS, 1560x720, 6.1
Nokia 2.3
IPS, 1520x720, 6.2
Huawei Y6s
IPS, 1560x720, 6.09
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
IPS, 1520x720, 6.22
Response Times
8%
-9%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
64 (31, 33)
49.2 (27.6, 21.6)
23%
54 (25, 29)
16%
52 (21, 31)
19%
Response Time Black / White *
24 (3, 21)
25.6 (12.4, 13.2)
-7%
32 (15, 17)
-33%
28 (11, 17)
-17%
PWM Frequency
7692 (25)
100 (10)
595 (15)
Screen
-15%
-35%
-15%
Brightness middle
488
515
6%
424
-13%
441
-10%
Brightness
481
488
1%
397
-17%
421
-12%
Brightness Distribution
95
92
-3%
85
-11%
89
-6%
Black Level *
0.25
0.23
8%
0.35
-40%
0.38
-52%
Contrast
1952
2239
15%
1211
-38%
1161
-41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.02
6.1
-22%
6.45
-28%
4.46
11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.99
13.4
-49%
12.76
-42%
8.01
11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.4
7.7
-75%
8.5
-93%
5.4
-23%
Gamma
2.252 98%
2.26 97%
2.231 99%
2.146 103%
CCT
7841 83%
8639 75%
9108 71%
7901 82%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-4% / -10%
-22% / -30%
-7% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31 ms rise
↘ 33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17957 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
5197 Points ∼89%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4868 Points ∼83% -6%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
3936 Points ∼67% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
4708 Points ∼81% -9%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3805 - 5237, n=14)
4643 Points ∼80% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=490)
5834 Points ∼100% +12%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6873 Points ∼100%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
4658 Points ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6026 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4404 - 6922, n=12)
5765 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=648)
6373 Points ∼93% -7%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1187 Points ∼55%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
837 Points ∼38% -29%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1061 Points ∼49% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1627 Points ∼75% +37%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (912 - 1187, n=13)
1012 Points ∼47% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=496)
2175 Points ∼100% +83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
451 Points ∼22%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
253 Points ∼12% -44%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
443 Points ∼21% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
418 Points ∼20% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (376 - 451, n=13)
423 Points ∼20% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=496)
2075 Points ∼100% +360%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
523 Points ∼27%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
299 Points ∼16% -43%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
509 Points ∼26% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
501 Points ∼26% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (435 - 523, n=13)
485 Points ∼25% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=497)
1926 Points ∼100% +268%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1189 Points ∼57%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
854 Points ∼41% -28%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1015 Points ∼49% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1618 Points ∼78% +36%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (900 - 1195, n=14)
1006 Points ∼48% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=526)
2085 Points ∼100% +75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
742 Points ∼27%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
459 Points ∼17% -38%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
712 Points ∼26% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
725 Points ∼26% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (452 - 823, n=14)
694 Points ∼25% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=526)
2762 Points ∼100% +272%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
810 Points ∼35%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
512 Points ∼22% -37%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
763 Points ∼33% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
826 Points ∼36% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (513 - 870, n=14)
744 Points ∼32% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=526)
2321 Points ∼100% +187%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1131 Points ∼55%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
822 Points ∼40% -27%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
435 Points ∼21% -62%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1657 Points ∼80% +47%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (860 - 1131, n=13)
982 Points ∼48% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=576)
2062 Points ∼100% +82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
397 Points ∼23%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
219 Points ∼13% -45%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
508 Points ∼29% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
369 Points ∼21% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (257 - 397, n=13)
328 Points ∼19% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=576)
1735 Points ∼100% +337%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
464 Points ∼28%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
262 Points ∼16% -44%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
304 Points ∼18% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
446 Points ∼27% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (305 - 464, n=13)
385 Points ∼23% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7323, n=577)
1658 Points ∼100% +257%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1124 Points ∼58%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
791 Points ∼41% -30%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1017 Points ∼53% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1654 Points ∼86% +47%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (854 - 1139, n=14)
987 Points ∼51% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=618)
1924 Points ∼100% +71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
655 Points ∼29%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
414 Points ∼18% -37%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
403 Points ∼18% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
719 Points ∼32% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (370 - 750, n=14)
548 Points ∼24% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=617)
2277 Points ∼100% +248%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
722 Points ∼37%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
463 Points ∼24% -36%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
465 Points ∼24% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
822 Points ∼42% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (428 - 803, n=14)
607 Points ∼31% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=620)
1961 Points ∼100% +172%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
14651 Points ∼96%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
15179 Points ∼99% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
12594 Points ∼83% -14%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9674 - 15891, n=14)
12309 Points ∼81% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=766)
15263 Points ∼100% +4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11220 Points ∼43%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7482 Points ∼29% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13408 Points ∼52% +20%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9536 - 13491, n=14)
10911 Points ∼42% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=764)
25897 Points ∼100% +131%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11836 Points ∼58%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
8432 Points ∼41% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13218 Points ∼65% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (9835 - 13960, n=14)
11154 Points ∼55% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=764)
20366 Points ∼100% +72%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.2 fps ∼38%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.8 fps ∼25% -33%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
4.2 fps ∼38% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.9 fps ∼35% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (4.1 - 4.8, n=12)
4.3 fps ∼38% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=288)
11.2 fps ∼100% +167%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.4 fps ∼17%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
0.84 fps ∼10% -40%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1.4 fps ∼17% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1.2 fps ∼15% -14%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (1.3 - 1.6, n=12)
1.392 fps ∼17% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=286)
8.07 fps ∼100% +476%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.7 fps ∼40%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.4 fps ∼27% -34%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
6.9 fps ∼42% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6.7 fps ∼40% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (6.7 - 7.6, n=12)
6.86 fps ∼41% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=292)
16.6 fps ∼100% +148%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.8 fps ∼20%
Nokia 2.3
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.3 fps ∼12% -39%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
3.8 fps ∼20% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.6 fps ∼19% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
  (3.5 - 4.7, n=12)
3.78 fps ∼20% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=291)
19.3 fps ∼100% +408%
Motorola Moto E6sNokia 2.3Huawei Y6sXiaomi Redmi 8AAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
19%
-4%
0%
-15%
12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
60.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
61.7 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
51.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=162)
-18%
50.7 (1.7 - 87.1, n=509)
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
80.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
84.9 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
70.8 (8.2 - 96.5, n=162)
-14%
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=509)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
17.7
30.33
71%
18.6
5%
15.8
-11%
18.4 (0.75 - 77.3, n=203)
4%
33.1 (0.14 - 319, n=856)
87%
Random Read 4KB
69.4
69.6
0%
46.7
-33%
73.1
5%
40.3 (3.59 - 117, n=203)
-42%
57.1 (1.59 - 324, n=856)
-18%
Sequential Write 256KB
103.5
149.18
44%
118
14%
106.4
3%
96 (14.8 - 189, n=203)
-7%
122 (2.99 - 911, n=856)
18%
Sequential Read 256KB
275
261.84
-5%
263.2
-4%
282
3%
237 (25.8 - 452, n=203)
-14%
329 (12.1 - 1802, n=856)
20%
Max. terhelés
 33.8 °C31.8 °C30.7 °C 
 33.9 °C31.8 °C30.9 °C 
 33.3 °C31.9 °C30.5 °C 
Maximum: 33.9 °C
Átlag: 32.1 °C
29.6 °C32.6 °C35.1 °C
29.6 °C32.6 °C35.4 °C
30.5 °C32.3 °C34.6 °C
Maximum: 35.4 °C
Átlag: 32.5 °C
Tápegység (max.)  39.6 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.437.4253536.53127.128.6402633.55030.437.36325.232.38022.725.710025.525.212520.126.416019.230.520017.835.725017.841.131516.145.640016.652.750015.96263014.364.280014.770.2100014.874.8125014.373.7160014.167.8200016.367.4250014.468.1315013.865.5400013.956.6500014.264.1630014.569.6800014.676.5100001574.51250015.360.61600015.761.2SPL71.226.982.3N25.60.950.7median 15median 64.1Delta1.611.6434336.837.832.83233.732.640.135.331.333.424.724.725.622.522.125.719.930.719.337.617.242.317.449.517.156.317.361.31564.31566.518.671.414.575.515.773.114.473.814.474.914.172.114.267.514.365.314.568.414.571.314.572.814.571.214.754.167.562.464.460.727.583.72015.51612.9154.4median 15median 66.51.512.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto E6sXiaomi Redmi 8A
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto E6s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi 8A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto E6s
3000 mAh
Nokia 2.3
4000 mAh
Huawei Y6s
3020 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
5000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
806
919
14%
743
-8%
1145
42%
689 (223 - 2636, n=721)
-15%
Akkumulátor üzemidő
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 26min

Pro

+ a tesztelés idején naprakész biztonsági javítások
+ jó üzemidő
+ ujjlenyomat-olvasó
+ dedikált microSD kártya nyílás
+ elegáns ház
+ könnyű

Kontra

- nagyon lassú WLAN
- hosszú töltési idő
- kamera kontraszt alacsony

Összegzés – Megfizethető és Könnyű

Motorola Moto E6s Smartphone rövid értékelés. Test device provided by: Motorola Germany.
Motorola Moto E6s Smartphone rövid értékelés. Test device provided by: Motorola Germany.

A Motorola Moto E6s egy meglehetősen könnyű, egyszerűen kezelhető okostelefon, amely egész jó minőségű, és elegáns kinézetű a színátmenetes hátoldalának köszönhetően. A kamera használható képeket készít, de alacsony kontraszttal. Mindemellett a kis méretű akkumulátor egész jó üzemidőt nyújt, és a teljesítmény is teljesen elfogadható ebben az árkategóriában.

A vásárlónak tudnia kell, hogy 100 euróért csodára nem számíthat, de a Motorola összességében egy korrekt okostelefont készített a korlátozott költségvetésből. Az ujjlenyomat-olvasó nem mindig adott ebben az árkategóriában, és a dedikált memória slot is egy pozitívum. Szintén pozitívum: Az okostelefon csak Android 9-et kínált az értékelésünkben, de naprakész biztonsági javításokkal.

Aki egy könnyű és megfizethető okostelefont keres, amely mégis egy használható üzemidőt kínál, az nem fog rosszul járni a Motorola Moto E6s-sel.

A nagyon lassú WLAN képtelen tartani az iramot a mezőnnyel, ezért zavarónak találtuk. Mindazonáltal a Motorola Moto E6s ajánlásra érdemes a könnyű okostelefonok kedvelőinek, feltéve, ha kevésbé igényes tevékenységekre használják a készüléküket.

Motorola Moto E6s - 05/06/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Váz
76%
Billentyűzet
65 / 75 → 87%
Érintőpad
92%
Csatlakoztathatóság
33 / 70 → 47%
Súly
91%
Akkumulátor
90%
Kijelző
85%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
6 / 64 → 10%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
54 / 86 → 63%
Hőmérséklet
93%
Zaj
100%
Audio
69 / 90 → 77%
Camera
40%
Átlag
69%
75%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Motorola Moto E6s Smartphone rövid értékelés - Mobiltelefon Kevés Pénzért
Florian Schmitt, 2020-07-17 (Update: 2020-07-17)