Notebookcheck

Motorola Moto E4 Smartphone rövid értékelés

Florian Wimmer (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 09/13/2017
ARM Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Cserélhető. Ebben az esetben ez pozitívumként hozzuk fel, ugyanis a Moto E4 telepe kivehető. A telefon elég olcsó, és ujjlenyomat olvasót is kapott. Tesztünkből kiderül, vajon a riválisoknak van-e miért aggódniuk.

Lenovo Moto E4 (Moto E Széria)
Processzor
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memória
2048 MB 
Kijelző
5 hüvelyk 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 294 PPI, IPS, fényes: igen
Háttértár
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm-es audio port, Kártyaolvasó: microSD, max. 32 GB, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: gyorsulásmérő, közelségérzékelő, USB-OTG
Hálózat
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B38/​B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 8.9 x 144 x 72.9
Akkumulátor
10.6 Wh, 2800 mAh Lítium-Ion, removeable
Operációs rendszer
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.2, kontraszt AF, LED vaku, videók @720p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.2
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: hangszóró az alsó élen, Billentyűzet: virtuális, töltő, USB kábel, 24 Hónap Garancia, LTE Cat.4 (150 MBit/s letöltés, 50 MBit/s feltöltés); SAR: 0,553 W/kg (fej), 1,27 W/kg (test), fanless
Súly
151 g, Tápegység: 56 g
Ár
159 Euró
Hivatkozások

 

Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4
Motorola Moto E4

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.1 MBit/s ∼100% +26%
Gigaset GS170
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.4 MBit/s ∼91% +15%
Lenovo Moto E3
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
47 MBit/s ∼87% +9%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.9 MBit/s ∼87% +9%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.6 MBit/s ∼81% +1%
Lenovo Moto E4
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.1 MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.5 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Gigaset GS170
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.9 MBit/s ∼93% +8%
Lenovo Moto E3
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
49.3 MBit/s ∼92% +7%
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s ∼92% +7%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s ∼91% +6%
Lenovo Moto E4
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.1 MBit/s ∼86%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – woods
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – woods
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – overview
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – overview
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – crossroads
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – crossroads
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – woods
GPS Motorola Moto E4 – woods

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Picture taken of reference card
Picture taken of reference card
Detail of reference card
Detail of reference card
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
511
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 511 cd/m² Átlag: 474 cd/m² Minimum: 7.21 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 87 %
Centrumban: 488 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1627:1 (Fekete: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | - Ø
96.2% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.27
Lenovo Moto E4
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Huawei Y6 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
PLS, 1280x720, 5
Gigaset GS170
IPS, 1280x720, 5
LG K8 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo Moto E3
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Screen
35%
8%
-47%
-31%
-18%
Brightness
474
432
-9%
494
4%
418
-12%
351
-26%
420
-11%
Brightness Distribution
87
90
3%
89
2%
92
6%
93
7%
91
5%
Black Level *
0.3
0.13
57%
0.35
-17%
0.45
-50%
0.49
-63%
0.41
-37%
Contrast
1627
3369
107%
1434
-12%
929
-43%
731
-55%
1063
-35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.4
4.8
11%
4.6
15%
9.7
-80%
7.1
-31%
5.4
-0%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.5
3.2
42%
2.5
55%
11.3
-105%
6.5
-18%
7
-27%
Gamma
2.27 106%
2.23 108%
2.29 105%
2.27 106%
2.12 113%
2.13 113%
CCT
7397 88%
7090 92%
6351 102%
10414 62%
8166 80%
8318 78%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
30856 Points ∼14%
Huawei Y6 2017
40981 Points ∼18% +33%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
35669 Points ∼16% +16%
Gigaset GS170
30144 Points ∼13% -2%
LG K8 2017
30924 Points ∼14% 0%
Lenovo Moto E3
20542 Points ∼9% -33%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
2674 Points ∼39%
Huawei Y6 2017
3487 Points ∼51% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3436 Points ∼50% +28%
Gigaset GS170
2600 Points ∼38% -3%
LG K8 2017
2986 Points ∼44% +12%
Lenovo Moto E3
2087 Points ∼31% -22%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
3518 Points ∼42%
Huawei Y6 2017
4607 Points ∼56% +31%
Gigaset GS170
3344 Points ∼40% -5%
LG K8 2017
4673 Points ∼56% +33%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
617 Points ∼40%
Huawei Y6 2017
734 Points ∼48% +19%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
662 Points ∼43% +7%
Gigaset GS170
558 Points ∼36% -10%
LG K8 2017
616 Points ∼40% 0%
Lenovo Moto E3
528 Points ∼34% -14%
Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
208 Points ∼2%
Huawei Y6 2017
386 Points ∼4% +86%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
252 Points ∼3% +21%
Gigaset GS170
210 Points ∼2% +1%
LG K8 2017
436 Points ∼5% +110%
Lenovo Moto E3
177 Points ∼2% -15%
Memory (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
576 Points ∼13%
Huawei Y6 2017
1288 Points ∼29% +124%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1055 Points ∼24% +83%
Gigaset GS170
610 Points ∼14% +6%
LG K8 2017
634 Points ∼14% +10%
Lenovo Moto E3
401 Points ∼9% -30%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
1077 Points ∼16%
Huawei Y6 2017
1354 Points ∼21% +26%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1395 Points ∼21% +30%
Gigaset GS170
1170 Points ∼18% +9%
LG K8 2017
1191 Points ∼18% +11%
Lenovo Moto E3
817 Points ∼12% -24%
Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
531 Points ∼14%
Huawei Y6 2017
839 Points ∼22% +58%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
704 Points ∼19% +33%
Gigaset GS170
538 Points ∼14% +1%
LG K8 2017
371 Points ∼10% -30%
Lenovo Moto E3
418 Points ∼11% -21%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
938 Points ∼11%
Huawei Y6 2017
1238 Points ∼15% +32%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1135 Points ∼13% +21%
LG K8 2017
1203 Points ∼14% +28%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
1532 Points ∼8%
Huawei Y6 2017
1903 Points ∼10% +24%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1858 Points ∼10% +21%
Gigaset GS170
1595 Points ∼9% +4%
LG K8 2017
1737 Points ∼9% +13%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
530 Points ∼11%
Huawei Y6 2017
680 Points ∼14% +28%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
634 Points ∼13% +20%
Gigaset GS170
581 Points ∼12% +10%
LG K8 2017
642 Points ∼13% +21%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
783 Points ∼26%
Huawei Y6 2017
971 Points ∼32% +24%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
923 Points ∼31% +18%
Gigaset GS170
772 Points ∼26% -1%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
85 Points ∼2%
Huawei Y6 2017
143 Points ∼3% +68%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
63 Points ∼1% -26%
Gigaset GS170
74 Points ∼1% -13%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
106 Points ∼3%
Huawei Y6 2017
176 Points ∼5% +66%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
79 Points ∼2% -25%
Gigaset GS170
93 Points ∼2% -12%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Moto E3
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
774 Points ∼26%
Huawei Y6 2017
967 Points ∼32% +25%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
925 Points ∼31% +20%
Gigaset GS170
781 Points ∼26% +1%
LG K8 2017
622 Points ∼21% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
126 Points ∼2%
Huawei Y6 2017
221 Points ∼3% +75%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
92 Points ∼1% -27%
Gigaset GS170
227 Points ∼3% +80%
LG K8 2017
31 Points ∼0% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
155 Points ∼3%
Huawei Y6 2017
267 Points ∼5% +72%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
115 Points ∼2% -26%
Gigaset GS170
152 Points ∼3% -2%
LG K8 2017
39 Points ∼1% -75%
Lenovo Moto E3
Points ∼0% -100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
8266 Points ∼11%
Huawei Y6 2017
11088 Points ∼15% +34%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
11426 Points ∼16% +38%
Gigaset GS170
8178 Points ∼11% -1%
LG K8 2017
6656 Points ∼9% -19%
Lenovo Moto E3
7156 Points ∼10% -13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
3168 Points ∼1%
Huawei Y6 2017
6184 Points ∼1% +95%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3725 Points ∼1% +18%
Gigaset GS170
3167 Points ∼1% 0%
LG K8 2017
2546 Points ∼1% -20%
Lenovo Moto E3
2694 Points ∼1% -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
3671 Points ∼2%
Huawei Y6 2017
6858 Points ∼3% +87%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
4381 Points ∼2% +19%
Gigaset GS170
3666 Points ∼2% 0%
LG K8 2017
2951 Points ∼1% -20%
Lenovo Moto E3
3127 Points ∼2% -15%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
6 fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2017
11 fps ∼1% +83%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
6.8 fps ∼1% +13%
Gigaset GS170
6 fps ∼0% 0%
LG K8 2017
3.4 fps ∼0% -43%
Lenovo Moto E3
5 fps ∼0% -17%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
11 fps ∼2%
Huawei Y6 2017
17 fps ∼4% +55%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
11 fps ∼2% 0%
Gigaset GS170
11 fps ∼2% 0%
LG K8 2017
6.4 fps ∼1% -42%
Lenovo Moto E3
9 fps ∼2% -18%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
2.2 fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2017
3.9 fps ∼1% +77%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2.6 fps ∼0% +18%
Gigaset GS170
2.2 fps ∼0% 0%
LG K8 2017
1.3 fps ∼0% -41%
Lenovo Moto E3
1.8 fps ∼0% -18%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
4.8 fps ∼1%
Huawei Y6 2017
8.1 fps ∼2% +69%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
5.4 fps ∼1% +13%
Gigaset GS170
4.8 fps ∼1% 0%
LG K8 2017
3.7 fps ∼1% -23%
Lenovo Moto E3
4 fps ∼1% -17%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
1.4 fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2017
2.5 fps ∼1% +79%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1.7 fps ∼0% +21%
Gigaset GS170
1.4 fps ∼0% 0%
LG K8 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Moto E3
1.2 fps ∼0% -14%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
14 fps ∼8%
Huawei Y6 2017
6 fps ∼3% -57%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3.8 fps ∼2% -73%
Gigaset GS170
3.4 fps ∼2% -76%
LG K8 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Moto E3
2.9 fps ∼2% -79%

Legend

 
Lenovo Moto E4 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 2017 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS170 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K8 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425, Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto E3 Mediatek MT6735P, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
17.643 Points ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
17.17 Points ∼97% +18%
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57)
17.124 Points ∼97% +18%
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60)
14.57 Points ∼83%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
14.342 Points ∼81% -2%
Lenovo Moto E3 (Chrome 56)
12.43 Points ∼70% -15%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
3092 Points ∼100% +36%
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57)
3052 Points ∼99% +34%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
2921 Points ∼94% +29%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
2284 Points ∼74% +1%
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60)
2270 Points ∼73%
Lenovo Moto E3 (Chrome 56)
2077 Points ∼67% -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60)
17184.6 ms * ∼100%
Lenovo Moto E3 (Chrome 56)
16744 ms * ∼97% +3%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
16722.7 ms * ∼97% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
12791 ms * ∼74% +26%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
12254.8 ms * ∼71% +29%
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57)
10742 ms * ∼63% +37%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
65 Points ∼100% +35%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
60 Points ∼92% +25%
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60)
48 Points ∼74%
Lenovo Moto E3 (Chrome 56)
38 Points ∼58% -21%

* ... smaller is better

Lenovo Moto E4Huawei Y6 2017Samsung Galaxy J3 2017Gigaset GS170LG K8 2017Lenovo Moto E3
AndroBench 3-5
-0%
2%
-26%
39%
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
44.9
26.4
-41%
59.6
33%
21.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-52%
52.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
16%
17.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-61%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
65.4
48.4
-26%
70.3
7%
37.41 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-43%
78.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
20%
29.78 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-54%
Random Write 4KB
29.2
20.54
-30%
9.5
-67%
10.45
-64%
12.5
-57%
8
-73%
Random Read 4KB
18.7
25.93
39%
24
28%
18.34
-2%
41.6
122%
16
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB
45.3
66.88
48%
51
13%
44.79
-1%
84.6
87%
37.3
-18%
Sequential Read 256KB
187.6
202.55
8%
177.7
-5%
197.86
5%
270.8
44%
141.4
-25%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 BeállításokÉrték
 high13 fps
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 BeállításokÉrték
 high30 fps
Max. terhelés
 33.8 °C31.5 °C30.5 °C 
 35 °C32 °C30.9 °C 
 34.7 °C32 °C30.9 °C 
Maximum: 35 °C
Átlag: 32.4 °C
31.4 °C32.3 °C33 °C
31.8 °C33 °C33.9 °C
32 °C33 °C34.5 °C
Maximum: 34.5 °C
Átlag: 32.8 °C
Tápegység (max.)  37.1 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.129.231.12527.128.627.13128.328.728.34032.734.632.75028.227.728.26326.124.826.18026.531.526.510026.133.826.112531.228.331.216023.522.923.520027.521.127.525035.42035.431545.82045.840054.32254.350062.822.962.86306819.36880071.118.371.1100073.618.373.6125072.717.972.7160075.716.475.720007516.575250075.316.775.3315075.616.275.6400074.316.174.3500072.816.272.8630072.816.172.8800071.416.171.41000074.316.174.31250071.51671.51600061.316.161.3SPL85.629.985.6N62.31.462.3median 71.4Lenovo Moto E4median 17.9median 71.4Delta13.32.813.329.629.929.627.928.927.928.83028.836.647.836.630.534.230.525.726.325.724.528.524.528.131.728.138.536.238.530.423.430.436.121.736.14020.74043.919.643.947.52147.553.820.253.859.818.759.864.718.864.765.717.665.767.117.667.169.516.869.570.116.370.172.816.472.873.916.173.975.916.275.973.81673.870.315.970.370.216.170.273.61673.668.815.868.853.815.953.883.429.983.452.11.452.1median 65.7Huawei Y6 2017median 17.6median 65.711.52.711.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo Moto E4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei Y6 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.11 / 0.23 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.87 / 2.38 / 2.47 Watt
Terhelés midlight 2.63 / 3.86 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Moto E4
2800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2400 mAh
Gigaset GS170
2500 mAh
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
Lenovo Moto E3
2800 mAh
Power Consumption
3%
14%
13%
17%
Idle Minimum *
0.87
0.82
6%
0.54
38%
0.65
25%
0.79
9%
Idle Average *
2.38
1.94
18%
1.56
34%
1.6
33%
1.7
29%
Idle Maximum *
2.47
2.06
17%
1.6
35%
1.62
34%
1.72
30%
Load Average *
2.63
3.31
-26%
3.18
-21%
2.97
-13%
2.65
-1%
Load Maximum *
3.86
3.89
-1%
4.42
-15%
4.34
-12%
3.16
18%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
21h 42min
WiFi böngészés v1.3
8h 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 08min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
5h 16min
Lenovo Moto E4
2800 mAh
Huawei Y6 2017
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2400 mAh
Gigaset GS170
2500 mAh
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
Lenovo Moto E3
2800 mAh
Battery Runtime
13%
20%
-15%
2%
7%
Reader / Idle
1302
1522
17%
1425
9%
1325
2%
H.264
608
693
14%
819
35%
649
7%
WiFi v1.3
522
654
25%
722
38%
442
-15%
594
14%
621
19%
Load
316
302
-4%
305
-3%
280
-11%
315
0%

Pro

+ kivehető telep
+ dedikált microSD hely
+ nem nyomódik be a ház
+ elég sok LTE sáv
+ ujjlenyomat olvasó
+ tiszta Android
+ világos, kontrasztos kijelző
+ alig melegszik
+ korrekt hangminőség

Kontra

- a fedél szorul
- a hátlap könnyen meghajlik
- nem naprakész biztonsági frissítések
- lassú WLAN
- eléggé pontatlan GPS
- a kamera által készített képek egyes részei homályosak
- nagy fogyasztás
In review: Lenovo Moto E4. Test unit provided by Lenovo Germany.
In review: Lenovo Moto E4. Test unit provided by Lenovo Germany.

A Moto E4 egy megfizethető okostelefon olyan pozitívumokkal, mint az ujjlenyomat olvasó, tiszta Android és kivehető telep. Amennyiben a jó kamera és a pontos navigáció nem létszükséglet, úgy a kategóriára jellemző teljesítményt kapjuk minden más területen: a hangminőség megfelelő, a készülék elég erős, és az üzemidő praktikus.

Elődjével összehasonlítva, a magasabb árat a fém ház, nagyobb teljesítmény és a bővebb tárhely igazolja. Az, hogy idén miért kerülnek valamivel többe a belépő szintű telefonok, az nagyrészt amúgy is a tárhely chipnek köszönhető, amelyek jelenleg nagyon drágák. A Moto E3 üzemideje hosszabb volt, így azt is érdemes lehet megnézegetni. Aki pedig a Moto E4 Plus iránt érdeklődik: sokkal nagyobb, nehezebb, a telep nem cserélhető ugyan, de sokkal nagyobb kapacitású is. A teljesítménye pedig nagyjából egy szinten van a sima Moto E4-gyel. Aki többre is kíváncsi, olvassa el értékelésünket a Moto E4 Plus-ról.

A Moto E4 egy korrekt belépő szintű okostelefon, amelynek csak kevés komolyabb gyengesége van, fő pozitívumai pedig a kivehető telep és az ujjlenyomat olvasó. A kamerától viszont ne várjunk túl sokat, mivel a minősége elég szerény.

Amikor az ember okostelefont keres, érdemes előre meghatározni, hogy mely funkciókat tartja igazán fontosnak. Amennyiben a cserélhető telep, valamint az ujjlenyomat olvasó az, úgy a Moto E4 mindenképpen megér egy pillantást. Aki viszont a fix telepek nagyobb kapacitására vágyik, az inkább a Samsung Galaxy J3-on gondolkodjon el, amely mostanra egy árban van a Moto E4-gyel. Ebben az árfekvésben, teljesítmény terén pedig a Huawei Y6 nyújtja a legtöbbet.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Lenovo Moto E4 - 09/08/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Váz
86%
Billentyűzet
64 / 75 → 86%
Érintőpad
91%
Csatlakoztathatóság
36 / 60 → 60%
Súly
92%
Akkumulátor
91%
Kijelző
85%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
6 / 63 → 10%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
30 / 70 → 43%
Hőmérséklet
92%
Zaj
100%
Audio
57 / 91 → 63%
Camera
55%
Átlag
68%
80%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Motorola Moto E4 Smartphone rövid értékelés
Florian Wimmer, 2017-09-13 (Update: 2017-09-13)