Notebookcheck

Lenovo Legion Phone Duel Smartphone rövid értékelés - Gamer telefon 144 Hz-es képernyővel

Szolid siker. A Lenovo Legion Phone Duel már első látásra is egyértelműen egy gamer telefon. A 144 Hz-es képernyőnek és az extrém teljesítménynek köszönhetően rendkívül kisimult működésű, és az ára is meggyőző. Vannak azonban kisebb hibák is...
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (fordította Zoltán Kiss), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Gaming Smartphone
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
, , , , , ,
hasonló találatok
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel (Legion Phone Széria)
Processzor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 8 x 2.4 - 3.1 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 650
Memória
16384 MB 
Kijelző
6.65 hüvelyk 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 388 PPI, kapacitív érintőképernyő, AMOLED, fényes: igen, HDR, 144 Hz
Háttértár
512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 492 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
2 USB 3.0, Audió csatlakozók: audio via USB-C, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: Gyorsulásmérő, giroszkóp, közelségérzékelő, iránytű
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G,3G,4G(B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42),5G (n1/​n3/​n28/​n38/​n41/​n77/​n78/​n79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 9.9 x 169.2 x 78.5
Akkumulátor
5000 mAh Lítium-Polimer, két cella, 90 wattos töltés
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operációs rendszer
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/​1.89, fázis-különbség AF, dupla LED vaku, videók @2160p/​30fps (1. Kamera); 16.0MP, f/​2.2, széles látószögű lencse (2. Kamera)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/​2.2, kihúzható
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: sztereó hangszórók, Billentyűzet: virtuális, kemény tok, töltő, két USB kábel, audió adapter, SIM kiadó eszköz, 24 Hónap Garancia, notifikációs LED (hátsó/sokszínű), SAR értékek: 0.884 W/kg (fej), 1.132 W/kg (test), LTE Cat 15/​18 (800Mbps/​210Mbps), fanless
Súly
239 g, Tápegység: 208 g
Ár
999 Euró
Hivatkozások
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Bewertung
Rating Version
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
87 %7
07/2021
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650
239 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.65"2340x1080
89 %7
08/2020
Asus ROG Phone 3
SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650
240 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.59"2340x1080
90 %7
07/2021
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14
227 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3200x1440
84 %7
Nubia RedMagic 5S
SD 865, Adreno 650
218 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.65"2340x1080
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel

Size comparison

171 mm 78 mm 9.9 mm 240 g169.2 mm 78.5 mm 9.9 mm 239 g168.56 mm 78 mm 9.75 mm 218 g165.1 mm 75.6 mm 8.9 mm 227 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Wi-Fi 6E
803 (437min - 889max) MBit/s ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Wi-Fi 6E
633 (523min - 703max) MBit/s ∼79% -6%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
681 (343min - 699max) MBit/s ∼85% +1%
Asus ROG Phone 3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
676 (337min - 699max) MBit/s ∼84% 0%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
673 (618min - 693max) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Wi-Fi 6E
922 (904min - 928max) MBit/s ∼100% +23%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Wi-Fi 6E
169 (156min - 180max) MBit/s ∼18% -77%
Asus ROG Phone 3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
893 (825min - 923max) MBit/s ∼97% +19%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
870 (371min - 959max) MBit/s ∼94% +16%
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
751 (686min - 802max) MBit/s ∼81%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765711759708760770767760787744762723692761775775713739748790712778711772799760802732770741686711759708760770767760787744762723692761775775713739748790712778711772799760802732770741686618693655690652653679661685658685672681672669675687673688680693678680681670685664663679673Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø750 (686-802)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø673 (618-693)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptobjektiv BlumeHauptobjektiv UmgebungHauptobjektiv Low Light
ColorChecker
18.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
14 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
12 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Legion Phone Duel: 10.6 ∆E min: 3.47 - max: 18.85 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
50 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
35 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
33.5 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
72 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
70.2 ∆E
65.8 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Legion Phone Duel: 44.15 ∆E min: 12.19 - max: 72 ∆E
535
cd/m²
547
cd/m²
564
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
571
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 571 cd/m² Átlag: 549.7 cd/m² Minimum: 5.59 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 93 %
Centrumban: 546 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.24 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
95.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.303
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.65
Asus ROG Phone 3
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.59
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3200x1440, 6.80
Nubia RedMagic 5S
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.65
Response Times
15%
14%
32%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 (5, 3)
3.6 (2, 1.6)
55%
3.2 (1.6, 1.6)
60%
2.8 (1.2, 1.6)
65%
Response Time Black / White *
6 (3, 3)
2.4 (1.2, 1.2)
60%
2.8 (1.2, 1.6)
53%
2.4 (1.2, 1.2)
60%
PWM Frequency
833.3
255.1 (99)
-69%
250 (99)
-70%
581.4 (99)
-30%
Screen
-40%
1%
-98%
Brightness middle
546
625
14%
910
67%
589
8%
Brightness
550
630
15%
913
66%
592
8%
Brightness Distribution
93
88
-5%
98
5%
90
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.24
2.6
-110%
2
-61%
3.1
-150%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.01
4.5
-124%
3.1
-54%
7.2
-258%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.9
2.5
-32%
2.2
-16%
5.6
-195%
Gamma
2.303 96%
2.22 99%
2.06 107%
2.31 95%
CCT
6200 105%
6750 96%
6512 100%
6633 98%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-13% / -22%
8% / 6%
-33% / -55%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 833.3 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 833.3 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 833.3 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 14825 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 16384
977 Points ∼88%
Asus ROG Phone 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 12288
995 Points ∼90% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1106 Points ∼100% +13%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
904 Points ∼82% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
  (950 - 1006, n=6)
979 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=234, last 2 years)
566 Points ∼51% -42%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 16384
3424 Points ∼96%
Asus ROG Phone 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 12288
3458 Points ∼97% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
3583 Points ∼100% +5%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3264 Points ∼91% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
  (3012 - 3458, n=6)
3243 Points ∼91% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=234, last 2 years)
1940 Points ∼54% -43%
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 16384
12355 Points ∼82%
Asus ROG Phone 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 12288
14979 Points ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
14362 Points ∼96% +16%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11075 Points ∼74% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
  (12355 - 14979, n=6)
13143 Points ∼88% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=267, last 2 years)
7878 Points ∼53% -36%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 16384
8780 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 12288
8777 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
8345 Points ∼95% -5%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8022 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
  (7369 - 8780, n=6)
8154 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=274, last 2 years)
3193 Points ∼36% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 16384
10442 Points ∼97%
Asus ROG Phone 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 12288
10330 Points ∼96% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
10794 Points ∼100% +3%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9395 Points ∼87% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
  (9453 - 10442, n=6)
10019 Points ∼93% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=274, last 2 years)
3570 Points ∼33% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 16384
5639 Points ∼98%
Asus ROG Phone 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 12288
5751 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
4651 Points ∼81% -18%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5307 Points ∼92% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
  (4159 - 5751, n=6)
4965 Points ∼86% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=274, last 2 years)
2959 Points ∼51% -48%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 16384
4244 Points ∼74%
Asus ROG Phone 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 12288
4143 Points ∼72% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5756 Points ∼100% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
  (4143 - 4244, n=2)
4194 Points ∼73% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=90, last 2 years)
2754 Points ∼48% -35%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 16384
4167 Points ∼71%
Asus ROG Phone 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 12288
4132 Points ∼70% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5873 Points ∼100% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
  (4132 - 4167, n=2)
4150 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=87, last 2 years)
2964 Points ∼50% -29%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability (sort by value)
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 16384
99.2 (4210min - 4259max) % ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 12288
99.4 (4129min - 4155max) % ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
64.4 (3633min - 5645max) % ∼65% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
  (99.2 - 99.4, n=2)
99.3 % ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (26.6 - 99.8, n=79, last 2 years)
89.5 % ∼90% -10%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 16384
51 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 12288
50 fps ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
37 fps ∼73% -27%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
  (27 - 54, n=6)
41.5 fps ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=280, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼44% -56%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 16384
58 fps ∼84%
Asus ROG Phone 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 12288
59 fps ∼86% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
69 fps ∼100% +19%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
53 fps ∼77% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
  (46 - 59, n=6)
56 fps ∼81% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=279, last 2 years)
25.6 fps ∼37% -56%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 16384
33 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 12288
33 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
26 fps ∼79% -21%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
32 fps ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
  (18 - 35, n=6)
27.2 fps ∼82% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=280, last 2 years)
14.8 fps ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 16384
22 fps ∼79%
Asus ROG Phone 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650, 12288
22 fps ∼79% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
28 fps ∼100% +27%
Nubia RedMagic 5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
21 fps ∼75% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
  (22 - 22, n=6)
22 fps ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=279, last 2 years)
10.1 fps ∼36% -54%
Lenovo Legion Phone DuelAsus ROG Phone 3Samsung Galaxy S21 UltraNubia RedMagic 5SAverage 512 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
15%
30%
-5%
10%
-49%
Sequential Read 256KB
1710.7
1710.23
0%
1710.18
0%
1348.19
-21%
1807 (1710 - 1999, n=3)
6%
752 (41.9 - 2037, n=285, last 2 years)
-56%
Sequential Write 256KB
765
771.91
1%
1077.13
41%
674.27
-12%
764 (754 - 772, n=3)
0%
327 (11.9 - 1321, n=285, last 2 years)
-57%
Random Read 4KB
207.7
274.33
32%
316.7
52%
213.27
3%
248 (208 - 274, n=3)
19%
134 (13.5 - 325, n=285, last 2 years)
-35%
Random Write 4KB
220.6
280.64
27%
279.54
27%
243.54
10%
254 (221 - 281, n=3)
15%
120 (4.97 - 330, n=285, last 2 years)
-46%
Max. terhelés
 39.9 °C42.7 °C39.7 °C 
 40.9 °C44.6 °C40.4 °C 
 40.7 °C45.7 °C39.9 °C 
Maximum: 45.7 °C
Átlag: 41.6 °C
34.8 °C38.3 °C36.1 °C
36.1 °C40 °C37 °C
35.2 °C42.1 °C36.8 °C
Maximum: 42.1 °C
Átlag: 37.4 °C
Tápegység (max.)  37.6 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.541.82532.635.23127.529.14030.231.65032.330.96325.527.68017.819.910022.623.612514.632.116013.3432001148.32509.749.8315858.94008.66450011.269.863013.771.580015.368100017.466.2125010.370.2160010.569.8200010.671.8250011.272.7315012.573.5400014.372.2500015.27063001564.7800016.1601000017.361.21250016.258.51600016.956.2SPL6568.126.182.2N18.221.50.752.3median 13.7median 64.7Delta2.8936.935.6292821.924.52223.629.936.12229.519.340.816.345.61448.316.958.114.956.214.160.21062.71167.111.771.310.970.811.971.51174.310.276.511.479.312.882.112.981.812.578.91376.613.177.413.476.415.772.113.574.21473.913.766.724.889.90.680.3median 13median 72.11.16.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Legion Phone DuelAsus ROG Phone 3
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Legion Phone Duel audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Asus ROG Phone 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Lenovo Legion Phone Duel
5000 mAh
Asus ROG Phone 3
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
5000 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 5S
4500 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
851
912
7%
702
-18%
730
-14%
898 (425 - 2000, n=295, last 2 years)
6%
Akkumulátor üzemidő
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 11min

Pro

+ nagyon erős
+ nagyon gyors képernyő
+ rendkívül gyors töltés
+ jó üzemidő
+ minőségi kamera

Kontra

- elavult biztonsági csomagok
- nagy hőtermelés terhelés alatt
- aránylag lassú WLAN

Értékelés - Ez egy jórészt sikeres gamer telefon

In review: Lenovo Legion Phone Duel. Test device provided by Lenovo Germany.
In review: Lenovo Legion Phone Duel. Test device provided by Lenovo Germany.

A Lenovo Legion Phone Duel egy jó gamer telefon, amely ténylegesen sima működésű a 144 Hz-es kijelzőjének köszönhetően, és a játékokat illetően jövőbiztos. A gyártó gyakran szokatlan megoldásokat kínál, mint például a kamera elhelyezése a ház közepére, vagy a középen kiemelkedő elülső kamera. Viszont egy rövid megszokási fázist követően tulajdonképpen meglehetősen jónak tűnik mindez.

Ízlés kérdése, hogy kinek tetszik a ház vagy sem, viszont tény, hogy nem visszafogott. Stabil és ergonomikus. A kamerákat is szeretjük. A képminőség meggyőző, és az elülső kamera jó szelfiket készít. Az üzemidő jó, és a telefon rendkívül gyorsan feltöltődik a dupla akkumulátornak és a dupla töltő portnak köszönhetően. Cserébe viszont el kell fogadnunk a súlyos töltőt.

A Lenovo Legion Phone Duel egy gamer telefon gyors képernyővel, sok okos megoldással és kevés apróbb hibával.

A képernyő lehetne világosabb, de a kijelző meggyőző, és a rendszer teljesítménye bőven elegendő a mai mobil játékokhoz.

Minden összevetve, a Lenovo kínál néhány okos megoldást, amelyek a Legion Phone Duel-t nem csak a gamerek számára teszik vonzóvá. Más téren, főként ami a szoftver lokalizációját illeti, hiányoznak az utolsó simítások, és a Lenovo-nak sürgősen ki kéne adnia egy biztonsági szoftverfrissítést.

Ár és elérhetőség

A Lenovo Legion Phone Duel jelenleg kizárólag itt elérhető

Lenovo Legion Phone Duel - 02/19/2021 v7
Florian Schmitt

Váz
86%
Billentyűzet
69 / 75 → 92%
Érintőpad
96%
Csatlakoztathatóság
55 / 70 → 79%
Súly
87%
Akkumulátor
90%
Kijelző
89%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
69 / 64 → 100%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
89 / 86 → 100%
Hőmérséklet
85%
Zaj
100%
Audio
70 / 90 → 78%
Camera
75%
Átlag
82%
87%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 186207 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Lenovo Legion Phone Duel Smartphone rövid értékelés - Gamer telefon 144 Hz-es képernyővel
Florian Schmitt, 2021-07- 1 (Update: 2021-07- 1)