Notebookcheck

Honor 6A Smartphone rövid értékelés

Manuel Masiero (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 09/15/2017
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Csináljuk rendesen a dolgokat. A Honor 6A hadüzenet a belépő szintű okostelefonok ellen. Körülbelül 200 dolláros áráért az 5 inches okostelefon műanyag+fém házat, nyolcmagos lapkakészletet, Android 7-et, HD kijelzőt és egy 13 MP-es kamerát kínál. Cikkünkből kiderül, vajon a Honor 6A offenzívája sikeres-e a riválisok ellen.

Honor 6A (6 Széria)
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memória
2048 MB 
Kijelző
5 hüvelyk 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 294 PPI, 5 pontos érintőkijelző, 16 millió szín, IPS, fényes: igen
Háttértár
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 8.3 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm-es audio jack, Kártyaolvasó: microSD, max. 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: gyorsulásmérő, közelségérzékelő, USB OTG
Hálózat
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM, HSPA, LTE, feji SAR 0.44 W/kg, test-SAR 0.94 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 8.2 x 143.7 x 70.95
Akkumulátor
3020 mAh Lítium-Ion
Operációs rendszer
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 28 mm, LED vaku, PDAF, videók: 1080p @30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix videók: 1080p @30 FPS
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: mono, Billentyűzet: virtuális, moduláris hálózati adapter (5V, 1A), Micro USB kábel, headset, SIM tű, QuickStart útmutató, EMUI 5.1, 24 Hónap Garancia, fanless
Súly
142 g, Tápegység: 35 g

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Moto G5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼100% +129%
Nokia 3
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
81.1 MBit/s ∼67% +53%
Honor 6A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.9 MBit/s ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.9 MBit/s ∼39% -11%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.6 MBit/s ∼36% -18%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Moto G5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
110 MBit/s ∼100% +115%
Nokia 3
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
76.6 MBit/s ∼70% +50%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.5 MBit/s ∼49% +4%
Honor 6A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.2 MBit/s ∼47%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s ∼44% -5%
Honor 6A: total route
Honor 6A: total route
Honor 6A: turning point
Honor 6A: turning point
Honor 6A: bridge
Honor 6A: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: total route
Garmin Edge 500: total route
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
450
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 480 cd/m² Átlag: 462.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.28 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 94 %
Centrumban: 480 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1116:1 (Fekete: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.4
Honor 6A
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo Moto G5
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Huawei Y6 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Nokia 3
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
PLS, 1280x720, 5
Sony Xperia XA
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Screen
20%
45%
-16%
13%
-39%
Brightness
462
625
35%
432
-6%
469
2%
494
7%
475
3%
Brightness Distribution
94
92
-2%
90
-4%
84
-11%
89
-5%
81
-14%
Black Level *
0.43
0.29
33%
0.13
70%
0.22
49%
0.35
19%
0.61
-42%
Contrast
1116
2276
104%
3369
202%
2186
96%
1434
28%
849
-24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.2
4.9
6%
4.8
8%
8.1
-56%
4.6
12%
6.8
-31%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.1
4.8
-55%
3.2
-3%
8.5
-174%
2.5
19%
7
-126%
Gamma
2.4 100%
2.18 110%
2.23 108%
2.16 111%
2.29 105%
2.35 102%
CCT
6688 97%
7357 88%
7090 92%
9014 72%
6351 102%
8151 80%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2232 Hz20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2232 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2232 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8499 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
21.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.4 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 6A
43936 Points ∼19%
Lenovo Moto G5
44653 Points ∼20% +2%
Huawei Y6 2017
40981 Points ∼18% -7%
Nokia 3
27703 Points ∼12% -37%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
35669 Points ∼16% -19%
Sony Xperia XA
48331 Points ∼21% +10%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Honor 6A
3710 Points ∼36%
Lenovo Moto G5
3583 Points ∼35% -3%
Huawei Y6 2017
3487 Points ∼34% -6%
Nokia 3
2568 Points ∼25% -31%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3436 Points ∼33% -7%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 6A
4820 Points ∼56%
Lenovo Moto G5
4730 Points ∼55% -2%
Huawei Y6 2017
4607 Points ∼54% -4%
Nokia 3
3439 Points ∼40% -29%
Sony Xperia XA
4685 Points ∼55% -3%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Honor 6A
606 Points ∼36%
Lenovo Moto G5
686 Points ∼40% +13%
Huawei Y6 2017
734 Points ∼43% +21%
Nokia 3
575 Points ∼34% -5%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
662 Points ∼39% +9%
Sony Xperia XA
717 Points ∼42% +18%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 6A
734 Points ∼8%
Lenovo Moto G5
722 Points ∼8% -2%
Huawei Y6 2017
386 Points ∼4% -47%
Nokia 3
211 Points ∼2% -71%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
252 Points ∼3% -66%
Sony Xperia XA
669 Points ∼7% -9%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 6A
765 Points ∼17%
Lenovo Moto G5
538 Points ∼12% -30%
Huawei Y6 2017
1288 Points ∼29% +68%
Nokia 3
703 Points ∼16% -8%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1055 Points ∼24% +38%
Sony Xperia XA
1076 Points ∼24% +41%
System (sort by value)
Honor 6A
1678 Points ∼16%
Lenovo Moto G5
1656 Points ∼16% -1%
Huawei Y6 2017
1354 Points ∼13% -19%
Nokia 3
1081 Points ∼11% -36%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1395 Points ∼14% -17%
Sony Xperia XA
2289 Points ∼22% +36%
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 6A
870 Points ∼23%
Lenovo Moto G5
815 Points ∼22% -6%
Huawei Y6 2017
839 Points ∼22% -4%
Nokia 3
551 Points ∼15% -37%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
704 Points ∼19% -19%
Sony Xperia XA
1043 Points ∼28% +20%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G5
1731 Points ∼20%
Huawei Y6 2017
1238 Points ∼14%
Nokia 3
1045 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1135 Points ∼13%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 6A
2612 Points ∼10%
Lenovo Moto G5
2563 Points ∼10% -2%
Huawei Y6 2017
1903 Points ∼8% -27%
Nokia 3
1520 Points ∼6% -42%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1858 Points ∼7% -29%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 6A
638 Points ∼11%
Lenovo Moto G5
619 Points ∼10% -3%
Huawei Y6 2017
680 Points ∼11% +7%
Nokia 3
556 Points ∼9% -13%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
634 Points ∼11% -1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 6A
1360 Points ∼44%
Lenovo Moto G5
1245 Points ∼40% -8%
Huawei Y6 2017
971 Points ∼32% -29%
Nokia 3
686 Points ∼22% -50%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
923 Points ∼30% -32%
Sony Xperia XA
1236 Points ∼40% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 6A
271 Points ∼5%
Lenovo Moto G5
243 Points ∼5% -10%
Huawei Y6 2017
143 Points ∼3% -47%
Nokia 3
85 Points ∼2% -69%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
63 Points ∼1% -77%
Sony Xperia XA
306 Points ∼6% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 6A
330 Points ∼8%
Lenovo Moto G5
296 Points ∼8% -10%
Huawei Y6 2017
176 Points ∼5% -47%
Nokia 3
106 Points ∼3% -68%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
79 Points ∼2% -76%
Sony Xperia XA
422 Points ∼11% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 6A
1339 Points ∼43%
Lenovo Moto G5
1243 Points ∼40% -7%
Huawei Y6 2017
967 Points ∼31% -28%
Nokia 3
745 Points ∼24% -44%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
925 Points ∼30% -31%
Sony Xperia XA
1259 Points ∼41% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 6A
507 Points ∼7%
Lenovo Moto G5
496 Points ∼6% -2%
Huawei Y6 2017
221 Points ∼3% -56%
Nokia 3
124 Points ∼2% -76%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
92 Points ∼1% -82%
Sony Xperia XA
525 Points ∼7% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 6A
588 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Moto G5
572 Points ∼11% -3%
Huawei Y6 2017
267 Points ∼5% -55%
Nokia 3
152 Points ∼3% -74%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
115 Points ∼2% -80%
Sony Xperia XA
603 Points ∼12% +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 6A
9297 Points ∼13%
Lenovo Moto G5
9089 Points ∼13% -2%
Huawei Y6 2017
11088 Points ∼15% +19%
Nokia 3
7925 Points ∼11% -15%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
11426 Points ∼16% +23%
Sony Xperia XA
12138 Points ∼17% +31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 6A
9663 Points ∼2%
Lenovo Moto G5
9617 Points ∼2% 0%
Huawei Y6 2017
6184 Points ∼1% -36%
Nokia 3
3177 Points ∼1% -67%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3725 Points ∼1% -61%
Sony Xperia XA
10916 Points ∼2% +13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 6A
9579 Points ∼5%
Lenovo Moto G5
9494 Points ∼5% -1%
Huawei Y6 2017
6858 Points ∼3% -28%
Nokia 3
3665 Points ∼2% -62%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
4381 Points ∼2% -54%
Sony Xperia XA
11156 Points ∼6% +16%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 6A
16 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto G5
16 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei Y6 2017
11 fps ∼1% -31%
Nokia 3
6 fps ∼0% -62%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
6.8 fps ∼0% -57%
Sony Xperia XA
18 fps ∼1% +13%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 6A
26 fps ∼2%
Lenovo Moto G5
14 fps ∼1% -46%
Huawei Y6 2017
17 fps ∼2% -35%
Nokia 3
10 fps ∼1% -62%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
11 fps ∼1% -58%
Sony Xperia XA
28 fps ∼3% +8%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 6A
7.1 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto G5
7.1 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei Y6 2017
3.9 fps ∼1% -45%
Nokia 3
2.2 fps ∼0% -69%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2.6 fps ∼0% -63%
Sony Xperia XA
7.2 fps ∼1% +1%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 6A
15 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Moto G5
7.4 fps ∼1% -51%
Huawei Y6 2017
8.1 fps ∼1% -46%
Nokia 3
4.5 fps ∼1% -70%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
5.4 fps ∼1% -64%
Sony Xperia XA
15 fps ∼3% 0%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6A
4.6 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto G5
4.6 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei Y6 2017
2.5 fps ∼1% -46%
Nokia 3
1.4 fps ∼0% -70%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1.7 fps ∼0% -63%
Sony Xperia XA
4.8 fps ∼1% +4%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6A
11 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Moto G5
5 fps ∼1% -55%
Huawei Y6 2017
6 fps ∼1% -45%
Nokia 3
3.2 fps ∼1% -71%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3.8 fps ∼1% -65%
Sony Xperia XA
11 fps ∼3% 0%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6A
2.5 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto G5
2.5 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei Y6 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia XA
2.5 fps ∼1% 0%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6A
5.6 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Moto G5
2.7 fps ∼0% -52%
Huawei Y6 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia XA
5.4 fps ∼0% -4%

Legend

 
Honor 6A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 2017 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 3 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51)
27.5 Points ∼100% +29%
Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
21.323 Points ∼78%
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)
20.36 Points ∼74% -5%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
17.643 Points ∼64% -17%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
17.17 Points ∼62% -19%
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
13.97 Points ∼51% -34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51)
4046 Points ∼100% +22%
Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
3326 Points ∼82%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
3092 Points ∼76% -7%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
2921 Points ∼72% -12%
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)
2604 Points ∼64% -22%
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
2269 Points ∼56% -32%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
16759 ms * ∼100% -53%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
12791 ms * ∼76% -17%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
12254.8 ms * ∼73% -12%
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)
11358 ms * ∼68% -4%
Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
10921.2 ms * ∼65%
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51)
9609.8 ms * ∼57% +12%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Sony Xperia XA (Chrome 51)
72 Points ∼100% +64%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
65 Points ∼90% +48%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
60 Points ∼83% +36%
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)
57 Points ∼79% +30%
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
49 Points ∼68% +11%
Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
44 Points ∼61%

* ... smaller is better

Honor 6ALenovo Moto G5Huawei Y6 2017Nokia 3Samsung Galaxy J3 2017Sony Xperia XA
AndroBench 3-5
78%
19%
-18%
-2%
11%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
57.98 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-8%
26.4
-58%
62.9
0%
59.6
-6%
50.68 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
48.4
-42%
64.3
-23%
70.3
-16%
72.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-13%
Random Write 4KB
6.94
37.9
446%
20.54
196%
5.5
-21%
9.5
37%
10.6
53%
Random Read 4KB
50.21
37.6
-25%
25.93
-48%
17.7
-65%
24
-52%
22.05
-56%
Sequential Write 256KB
64.06
45.6
-29%
66.88
4%
34
-47%
51
-20%
68.64
7%
Sequential Read 256KB
123.57
230.6
87%
202.55
64%
181
46%
177.7
44%
240.43
95%
Dead Trigger 2
 BeállításokÉrték
 high52 fps
összehasonlítva
Lenovo Moto E3 (min)
 MT6735P, Mali-T720
26
   ...
Huawei P10 Lite
 Kirin 658, Mali-T830 MP2
51
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2
52
Honor 6A
 430, Adreno 505
52
Huawei Nova
 625, Adreno 506
53
Lenovo K6
 430, Adreno 505
53
   ...
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (max)
 835, Adreno 540
60
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 BeállításokÉrték
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Max. terhelés
 42.6 °C42.5 °C42.6 °C 
 42.4 °C42.4 °C43.1 °C 
 41.5 °C41.8 °C41.5 °C 
Maximum: 43.1 °C
Átlag: 42.3 °C
37 °C38 °C38.5 °C
37.1 °C38.2 °C38.6 °C
37.5 °C38.3 °C38.4 °C
Maximum: 38.6 °C
Átlag: 38 °C
Tápegység (max.)  39.3 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.637.12525.436.73125.336.94032.929.75033.632.36331.633.78028.427.5100272712520.825.61602226.320021.331.525020.839.831521.24640019.45350019.559.263017.762.280017.964.4100017.869125017.370.7160017.469.3200016.771.5250017.274315018.274.4400017.976.7500017.676.8630017.772800017.870.41000017.968.71250018.1681600018.263.8SPL3083.8N1.355.6median 17.9Honor 6Amedian 68Delta1.312.527.330.527.327.730.827.726.929.226.934.233.534.226.229.226.223.527.823.525.730.525.725.429.525.432.523.732.522.723.822.726.322.726.332.122.232.140.922.540.949.722.149.758.521.358.565.119.365.17019.77070.71970.769.518.369.569.416.269.470.715.970.772.215.572.274.515.774.580.715.480.780.515.280.571.915.271.970.515.270.569.915.169.958.615.158.646.11546.186.529.686.560.21.360.2median 69.4Nokia 3median 18.3median 69.412.73.512.728.231.128.230.330.130.329.329.929.333.634.433.62834.62827.229.327.229.232.229.231.934.131.939.836.939.836.423.836.448.421.548.451.720.951.757.121.357.159.819.759.865.820.165.867.618.567.667.719.367.769.517.869.567.817.467.867.516.467.567.616.467.667.916.667.97116.17174.716.174.77116.17161166158.716.158.758.916.158.951.31651.339.81639.880.930.180.947.91.447.9median 61Samsung Galaxy J3 2017median 17.4median 618.73.78.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Honor 6A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Nokia 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 1.33 / 2.53 / 2.54 Watt
Terhelés midlight 3.84 / 6.12 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 6A
3020 mAh
Lenovo Moto G5
2800 mAh
Nokia 3
2630 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2400 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Power Consumption
25%
39%
26%
27%
Idle Minimum *
1.33
0.73
45%
0.67
50%
0.82
38%
0.72
46%
Idle Average *
2.53
1.64
35%
1.35
47%
1.94
23%
1.5
41%
Idle Maximum *
2.54
1.68
34%
1.39
45%
2.06
19%
1.57
38%
Load Average *
3.84
3.46
10%
3.1
19%
3.31
14%
3.48
9%
Load Maximum *
6.12
6.13
-0%
4.02
34%
3.89
36%
6.04
1%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
33h 30min
WiFi böngészés v1.3
13h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 12min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
4h 55min
Honor 6A
3020 mAh
Lenovo Moto G5
2800 mAh
Huawei Y6 2017
3000 mAh
Nokia 3
2630 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2400 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-28%
-11%
-21%
-6%
-49%
Reader / Idle
2010
1243
-38%
1522
-24%
1258
-37%
1425
-29%
775
-61%
H.264
732
616
-16%
693
-5%
628
-14%
819
12%
460
-37%
WiFi v1.3
790
561
-29%
654
-17%
552
-30%
722
-9%
353
-55%
Load
295
207
-30%
302
2%
283
-4%
305
3%
170
-42%

Pro

+ megfizethető
+ műanyag+fém ház
+ hibrid Dual-SIM
+ világos HD kijelző
+ jó rendszer teljesítmény
+ terhelés alatt sem fojt le
+ hosszú üzemidő

Kontra

- nem sok szabad tárhely
- nincs App2SD
- nem friss Android biztonsági frissítések
- nincs 5 GHz Wi-Fi
- középszerű kamera
Review: Honor 6A. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.
Review: Honor 6A. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.

A Honor 6A-val a gyártónak sikerült hűnek maradnia az elveihez, és jó ár/érték arányú telefont alkotott. Az 5 inches Android-os telefon, amely 200 dollárért vagy kevesebbért) kapható, elég sokat kínál: remekül összerakott műanyag és fém házat, világos, jól beállított HD kijelzőt, hosszú üzemidőt és gyors rendszert.

Bár a Honor 6A "csak" egy megfizethető, belépő szintű készülék, viszonylag nagy teljesítménnyel és sok funkcióval rendelkezik.

A Honor azonban a belső tárhelyen spórolt, és a 16 GB-nak amúgy is csak a fele elérhető a felhasználó számára is. A 13 MP-es kamera sem különösebben figyelemre méltó, a képek minősége csak középszerű. A gyártónak az Android biztonsági frissítéseivel is érdemes lenne többet törődnie, mivel azok a teszt idején már több, mint 3 hónaposak. 

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Honor 6A - 09/11/2017 v6
Manuel Masiero

Váz
82%
Billentyűzet
68 / 75 → 90%
Érintőpad
82%
Csatlakoztathatóság
35 / 60 → 58%
Súly
93%
Akkumulátor
95%
Kijelző
85%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
20 / 63 → 31%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
40 / 70 → 57%
Hőmérséklet
85%
Zaj
100%
Audio
63 / 91 → 69%
Camera
59%
Átlag
70%
80%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Honor 6A Smartphone rövid értékelés
Manuel Masiero, 2017-09-15 (Update: 2017-09-15)