Notebookcheck

Gigabyte A7 X1 rövid értékelés: Gamer laptop stabil állóképességgel

AMD-Nvidia kombó. A Gigabyte könnyen frissíthető laptopot kombinál egy erős AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX-szel és egy Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 processzorral az A7 X1-ben. Tovább olvasva kiderül, hogy mire képes ez az ígéretes hardver platform a mindennapi játszásban.
Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Glaser (fordította Zoltán Kiss), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AMD Gaming Geforce Windows Ryzen (Zen) Laptop / Notebook
Gigabyte A7 X1
Processzor
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.6 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne H (Zen 3)
Grafikus adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU - 8192 MB, Mag: 1560 MHz, Memória: 1750 MHz, 140 W TDP, NVIDIA 471.68, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Memória
16384 MB 
, kétcsatornás
Kijelző
17.30 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics AUO8E8D, IPS, fényes: nem, 144 Hz
Alaplap
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Háttértár
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4, 512 GB 
, 470 GB ingyenes
Hangkártya
AMD Raven/Renoir/Van Gogh/Cezanne/Rembrandt - HD Audio Controller
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington zár, Audió csatlakozók: 1x audió, 1x mikrofon
Hálózat
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 34 x 396 x 262
Akkumulátor
48.96 Wh Lítium-Ion
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webkamera: 0.9 MP, 16:9 (1280x720)
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: 2x 2W, Billentyűzet: chiclet, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, 24 Hónap Garancia
Súly
2.53 kg, Tápegység: 692 g
Ár
1,800 Euró
Hivatkozások
Megjegyzés: A gyártó különböző beszállítóktól származó alkatrészeket használhat, beleértve a hasonló specifikációjú kijelzőpaneleket, meghajtókat vagy memóriastickeket.

 

, , , , , ,
hasonló találatok
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Possible contenders in comparison

Értékelés
Dátum
Model
Súly
Magasság
Méret
Felbontás
Legjobb ár
83.2 %
01/2022
Gigabyte A7 X1
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg34 mm17.30"1920x1080
85 %
09/2021
Medion Erazer Beast X25
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23 mm17.30"1920x1080
85.5 %
Medion Erazer Beast X20
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg23 mm17.30"2560x1440
82.8 %
10/2021
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080
85.1 %
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg27 mm17.30"2560x1440
Gigabyte A7 X1
Gigabyte A7 X1
Gigabyte A7 X1
Gigabyte A7 X1
Gigabyte A7 X1
Gigabyte A7 X1

Size comparison

396 mm 262 mm 34 mm 2.5 kg399 mm 269 mm 26 mm 2.7 kg396 mm 261 mm 27 mm 2.5 kg395 mm 262 mm 23 mm 2.3 kg395 mm 262 mm 23 mm 2.2 kg
Left side: Kensington lock, power supply, 1x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, 1x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2
Left side: Kensington lock, power supply, 1x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, 1x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2
Right side: 1x microphone, 1x headset, 1x USB 2.0
Right side: 1x microphone, 1x headset, 1x USB 2.0
Back: 1x Mini DP 1.4, HDMI, 2.5 Gigabit LAN, 1x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (incl. DP 1.4)
Back: 1x Mini DP 1.4, HDMI, 2.5 Gigabit LAN, 1x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (incl. DP 1.4)
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1498 (748min - 1544max) MBit/s ∼100% +52%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1351 (1239min - 1420max) MBit/s ∼90% +37%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1350 MBit/s ∼90% +37%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (496 - 1645, n=159, az elmúlt 2 évben)
1161 MBit/s ∼78% +18%
Átlagos Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (447 - 1645, n=123)
1097 MBit/s ∼73% +11%
Gigabyte A7 X1
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
988 (942min - 1041max) MBit/s ∼66%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
 
582 (312min - 680max) MBit/s ∼39% -41%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte A7 X1
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1432 (1269min - 1668max) MBit/s ∼100%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1390 (669min - 1618max) MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1370 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=159, az elmúlt 2 évben)
1225 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Átlagos Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (523 - 1665, n=124)
1182 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1021 (947min - 1109max) MBit/s ∼71% -29%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
 
569 (350min - 709max) MBit/s ∼40% -60%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650159814851613143712691505143615801378132113091350133113151309129013381309148514571358160615791668159114091309142415221371159814851613143712691505143615801378132113091350133113151309129013381309148514571358160615791668159114091309142415221371980962971982957998984993978988982973998990982942101610269949769821041984998100398510029871006981Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1432 (1269-1668)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø988 (942-1041)
ColorChecker
18.4 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
16 ∆E
16 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
20 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
20 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Gigabyte A7 X1: 17.82 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 27.7 ∆E
313
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
AU Optronics AUO8E8D
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 326 cd/m² (Nits) Átlag: 318.1 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 95 %
Centrumban: 325 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1121:1 (Fekete: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.33 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 1.95
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
63.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.142
Gigabyte A7 X1
AU Optronics AUO8E8D, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Medion Erazer Beast X25
BOE NE173FHM-NZ1 (BOE0884), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Medion Erazer Beast X20
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
AU Optronics AUI8294 (B173HAN04.9), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
BOE NE173QHM-NY2 (BOE0977), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Display
12%
12%
-34%
13%
Display P3 Coverage
61.5
70.4
14%
70.11
14%
40.1
-35%
70.46
15%
sRGB Coverage
90.9
99.8
10%
99.01
9%
60
-34%
99.47
9%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
63.2
71.6
13%
71.35
13%
41.4
-34%
71.85
14%
Response Times
45%
6%
-105%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16 ?(7.6, 8.4)
9.2 ?(4.8, 4.4)
42%
16 ?(8.4, 7.6)
-0%
32.4
-103%
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
10.8 ?(6.4, 4.4)
5.6 ?(2.8, 2.8)
48%
9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2)
11%
22.4
-107%
10 ?(4, 6)
7%
PWM Frequency
Screen
17%
19%
-11%
19%
Brightness middle
325
329
1%
370
14%
266
-18%
410
26%
Brightness
318
315
-1%
341
7%
264
-17%
381
20%
Brightness Distribution
95
88
-7%
82
-14%
79
-17%
88
-7%
Black Level *
0.29
0.33
-14%
0.42
-45%
0.32
-10%
0.37
-28%
Contrast
1121
997
-11%
881
-21%
831
-26%
1108
-1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.33
2.03
53%
1.76
59%
3.97
8%
2.55
41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.6
5.5
36%
2.88
67%
8.93
-4%
4.33
50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.95
0.82
58%
1.3
33%
3.5
-79%
1.28
34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.5
3.5
36%
1.8
67%
1.8
67%
3.4
38%
Gamma
2.142 103%
2.223 99%
2.176 101%
2.31 95%
2.275 97%
CCT
7893 82%
6526 100%
6543 99%
6754 96%
6637 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
41.4
72
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
60
95
Teljes átlag (program / beállítások)
25% / 20%
12% / 15%
-50% / -29%
11% / 15%

* ... a kisebb jobb

Megjelenítési válaszidők

A kijelző válaszideje azt mutatja, hogy a képernyő milyen gyorsan képes egyik színről a másikra váltani. A lassú válaszidők utóképekhez vezethetnek, és a mozgó tárgyak elmosódottak lehetnek (szellemképek). A gyors tempójú 3D-s címek játékosainak különösen oda kell figyelniük a gyors válaszidőkre.
       Válaszidő Fekete-fehér
10.8 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva↗ 6.4 ms emelkedés
↘ 4.4 ms ősz
A képernyő jó reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, de túl lassú lehet a versenyképes játékosok számára.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő jobb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (23.8 ms).
       Válaszidő 50% szürke és 80% szürke között
16 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva↗ 7.6 ms emelkedés
↘ 8.4 ms ősz
A képernyő jó reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, de túl lassú lehet a versenyképes játékosok számára.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő jobb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (37.5 ms).

Képernyő villogása / PWM (impulzusszélesség-moduláció)

A képernyő tompításához egyes notebookok egyszerűen be- és kikapcsolják a háttérvilágítást gyors egymásutánban - ez az úgynevezett impulzusszélesség-moduláció (PWM) módszer. Ennek a ciklikus frekvenciának ideális esetben az emberi szem számára nem észlelhetőnek kell lennie. Ha ez a frekvencia túl alacsony, az érzékeny szemű felhasználóknak megerőltető lehet, fejfájást okozhat, vagy akár észre is vehetik a villódzást.
Képernyő villogása / PWM nem érzékelhető

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20931 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Gigabyte A7 X1 - GPUz1
Gigabyte A7 X1 - GPUz2
Gigabyte A7 X1 - HWInfo1
Gigabyte A7 X1 - HWInfo2
Gigabyte A7 X1 - CPUz1
Gigabyte A7 X1 - CPUz2
Gigabyte A7 X1 - CPUz3
Gigabyte A7 X1 - CPUz4

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

011022033044055066077088099011001210132014301540165017601870198020902087.252061.322051.182061.112061.962066.862060.92067.612070.822069.112066.652061.542067.612047.822058.572074.582066.542065.82060.262066.442068.892057.822060.692046.662059.942041.342007.532014.812010.662016.232005.522005.411996.512000.72003.412007.022011.671987.082006.622006.821985.72002.71981.961992.731997.41993.522007.431994.122005.922013.391336.011322.141320.791322.81322.971321.961314.411322.311322.141326.791320.611319.441325.251324.241325.031321.621318.131321.751319.781320.791318.781318.611321.091318.521319.831322.11325.341322.141321.831318.741322.451310.361322.311322.311313.51319.391321.7513191318.911318.572029.221957.331933.31876.081915.431921.231926.971872.051921.231895.641870.641906.941917.1818901908.311883.061899.881878.821901.231861.161743.831873.451858.821795.91934.241792.841805.381786.911776.041698.442108.482088.662082.682069.322064.32049.52071.042042.92067.722036.872052.762071.042062.712068.472056.132063.452044.572064.22059.412044.572059.412044.572052.762049.392057.82Tooltip
Gigabyte A7 X1 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2064 (2046.66-2087.25)
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2004 (1981.96-2041.34)
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H: Ø1321 (1310.36-1336.01)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H: Ø1874 (1698.44-2029.22)
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2061 (2036.87-2108.48)
Cinebench R23
CPU (Multi Core)
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (6622 - 14363, n=24)
12557 Points ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12476 Points ∼99%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12373 Points ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
11739 Points ∼93% -6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
11567 Points ∼92% -7%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (4621 - 14363, n=108, az elmúlt 2 évben)
10959 Points ∼87% -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
8250 Points ∼66% -34%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
1574 Points ∼100% +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1491 Points ∼95% +1%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1479 Points ∼94%
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1218 - 1498, n=23)
1467 Points ∼93% -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1403 Points ∼89% -5%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (1095 - 1619, n=107, az elmúlt 2 évben)
1387 Points ∼88% -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
1227 Points ∼78% -17%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4850 Points ∼100%
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (2242 - 5476, n=24)
4846 Points ∼100% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4776 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4510 Points ∼93% -7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
4403 Points ∼91% -9%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (1397 - 6321, n=198, az elmúlt 2 évben)
3876 Points ∼80% -20%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
3027 Points ∼62% -38%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
600 Points ∼100% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
581 Points ∼97% 0%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
580 Points ∼97%
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (471 - 584, n=23)
571 Points ∼95% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
540 Points ∼90% -7%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (312 - 634, n=197, az elmúlt 2 évben)
511 Points ∼85% -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
470 Points ∼78% -19%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2108 (2036.87min - 2108.48max) Points ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2087 (2046.66min - 2087.25max) Points ∼99%
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1076 - 2267, n=23)
2047 Points ∼97% -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2041 (1981.96min - 2041.34max) Points ∼97% -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
2029 Points ∼96% -3%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (536 - 2804, n=213, az elmúlt 2 évben)
1644 Points ∼78% -21%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
1336 Points ∼63% -36%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
241 Points ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
241 Points ∼100%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
239 Points ∼99% -1%
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (197 - 243, n=19)
237 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
232 Points ∼96% -4%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (108 - 254, n=199, az elmúlt 2 évben)
206 Points ∼85% -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
201 Points ∼83% -17%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
333 Seconds * ∼100% -35%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (179 - 555, n=192, az elmúlt 2 évben)
312 Seconds * ∼94% -27%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
250 Seconds * ∼75% -2%
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (219 - 442, n=23)
250 Seconds * ∼75% -2%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
246 Seconds * ∼74%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
245 Seconds * ∼74% -0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
242 Seconds * ∼73% +2%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
59182 MIPS ∼100% +7%
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (36011 - 62503, n=23)
57433 MIPS ∼97% +4%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
57284 MIPS ∼97% +4%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
55231 MIPS ∼93%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
50441 MIPS ∼85% -9%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (15146 - 76063, n=193, az elmúlt 2 évben)
45645 MIPS ∼77% -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
39581 MIPS ∼67% -28%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
5870 MIPS ∼100% +3%
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (4791 - 5865, n=23)
5690 MIPS ∼97% 0%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5681 MIPS ∼97%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5664 MIPS ∼96% 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5590 MIPS ∼95% -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
5321 MIPS ∼91% -6%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (2945 - 6506, n=193, az elmúlt 2 évben)
5273 MIPS ∼90% -7%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
9294 Points ∼100% +22%
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (5057 - 9294, n=21)
8139 Points ∼88% +7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8035 Points ∼86% +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
7725 Points ∼83% +2%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
7599 Points ∼82%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (2783 - 11393, n=188, az elmúlt 2 évben)
7353 Points ∼79% -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
6403 Points ∼69% -16%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
1576 Points ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1538 Points ∼98%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1529 Points ∼97% -1%
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1271 - 1561, n=21)
1507 Points ∼96% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1354 Points ∼86% -12%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (703 - 1777, n=188, az elmúlt 2 évben)
1341 Points ∼85% -13%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
1191 Points ∼76% -23%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.8 fps ∼100% +7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.6 fps ∼99% +5%
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (8.26 - 17.1, n=23)
15.2 fps ∼96% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
14.9 fps ∼94% +1%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
14.8 fps ∼94%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (6.13 - 19.8, n=192, az elmúlt 2 évben)
12.5 fps ∼79% -16%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
10.7 fps ∼68% -28%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
56.5 s * ∼100%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (23.9 - 113, n=186, az elmúlt 2 évben)
54.4 s * ∼96% +4%
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (44.1 - 87.4, n=23)
53.9 s * ∼95% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
52.2 s * ∼92% +8%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
50.8 s * ∼90% +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
49.3 s * ∼87% +13%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
45.8 s * ∼81% +19%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.6 sec * ∼100% -20%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (0.4905 - 1.088, n=188, az elmúlt 2 évben)
0.576 sec * ∼96% -15%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.529 sec * ∼88% -5%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.512 sec * ∼85% -2%
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (0.4851 - 0.599, n=23)
0.509 sec * ∼85% -1%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.502 sec * ∼84%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4926 sec * ∼82% +2%

* ... a kisebb jobb

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2087 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
169 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
241 Points
Segítség
PCMark 10 / Score
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
6983 Points ∼100% +1%
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (6875 - 6967, n=4)
6916 Points ∼99% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6901 Points ∼99% 0%
Gigabyte A7 X1
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
6898 Points ∼99%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6842 Points ∼98% -1%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (3952 - 7884, n=172, az elmúlt 2 évben)
6186 Points ∼89% -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
5908 Points ∼85% -14%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10602 Points ∼100% +6%
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (9991 - 10413, n=3)
10170 Points ∼96% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
10051 Points ∼95% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10018 Points ∼94% 0%
Gigabyte A7 X1
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
9991 Points ∼94%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (7148 - 11064, n=171, az elmúlt 2 évben)
9676 Points ∼91% -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
8609 Points ∼81% -14%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (9301 - 9381, n=3)
9335 Points ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte A7 X1
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
9324 Points ∼100%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9252 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9071 Points ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
8849 Points ∼95% -5%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (5813 - 10066, n=171, az elmúlt 2 évben)
8384 Points ∼90% -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
7771 Points ∼83% -17%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
10389 Points ∼100% +9%
Gigabyte A7 X1
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
9561 Points ∼92%
Átlagos AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (9383 - 9561, n=3)
9446 Points ∼91% -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9377 Points ∼90% -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9274 Points ∼89% -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
8367 Points ∼81% -12%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (3670 - 12250, n=171, az elmúlt 2 évben)
8043 Points ∼77% -16%
PCMark 10 Score
6898 pontok
Segítség
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
1820.7 μs * ∼100% -130%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1398.7 μs * ∼77% -77%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
906.7 μs * ∼50% -14%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
843.5 μs * ∼46% -6%
Gigabyte A7 X1
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
792.4 μs * ∼44%

* ... a kisebb jobb

Gigabyte A7 X1
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Átlagos ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
14%
3%
18%
27%
3%
Write 4K
125.1
129.7
4%
155.5
24%
168.79
35%
206.1
65%
132 ?(125 - 138, n=4)
6%
Read 4K
43.51
62.37
43%
47.96
10%
72.04
66%
53
22%
45.4 ?(43.5 - 46.9, n=4)
4%
Write Seq
2128
2436
14%
1591
-25%
3018
42%
2303 ?(2128 - 2509, n=4)
8%
Read Seq
1958
2354
20%
1371
-30%
2575
32%
1716 ?(1052 - 2209, n=4)
-12%
Write 4K Q32T1
579
512.3
-12%
532.2
-8%
459.47
-21%
535.2
-8%
525 ?(374 - 601, n=4)
-9%
Read 4K Q32T1
464.4
436.2
-6%
626.6
35%
473.07
2%
607.6
31%
581 ?(464 - 677, n=4)
25%
Write Seq Q32T1
2501
3541
42%
3017
21%
3129.1
25%
3242
30%
2515 ?(2501 - 2536, n=4)
1%
Read Seq Q32T1
3473
3568
3%
3440
-1%
3528.8
2%
3617
4%
3417 ?(3372 - 3473, n=4)
-2%
AS SSD
16%
15%
10%
27%
6%
Seq Read
2858.5
2591.36
-9%
2848.5
0%
2837
-1%
3019.89
6%
2643 ?(2048 - 2972, n=4)
-8%
Seq Write
1529.7
1899.86
24%
2831.42
85%
1565
2%
2631.23
72%
2134 ?(1530 - 2403, n=4)
40%
4K Read
41.47
53.88
30%
51.28
24%
55.37
34%
60.35
46%
48.3 ?(41.5 - 55.7, n=4)
16%
4K Write
133.85
112.63
-16%
106.31
-21%
152.86
14%
171.59
28%
116 ?(98.8 - 134, n=4)
-13%
4K-64 Read
1217.5
1334.74
10%
1762.89
45%
1326.97
9%
1410.3
16%
1586 ?(1218 - 1775, n=4)
30%
4K-64 Write
2108.02
2966.31
41%
2009.98
-5%
1922.42
-9%
2324.17
10%
1975 ?(1473 - 2267, n=4)
-6%
Access Time Read *
0.098
0.038
61%
0.093
5%
0.035
64%
0.045
54%
0.0998 ?(0.079 - 0.131, n=4)
-2%
Access Time Write *
0.028
0.036
-29%
0.035
-25%
0.028
-0%
0.024
14%
0.0333 ?(0.028 - 0.039, n=4)
-19%
Score Read
1545
1648
7%
2099
36%
1666
8%
1773
15%
1899 ?(1545 - 2128, n=4)
23%
Score Write
2395
3269
36%
2399
0%
2232
-7%
2759
15%
2305 ?(1815 - 2598, n=4)
-4%
Score Total
4666
5733
23%
5573
19%
4695
1%
5429
16%
5151 ?(4645 - 5698, n=4)
10%
Teljes átlag (program / beállítások)
15% / 15%
9% / 10%
14% / 13%
27% / 27%
5% / 5%

* ... a kisebb jobb

ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3473 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2501 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 464.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 579 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1958 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2128 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 43.51 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125.1 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte A7 X1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
35909 Points ∼100%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
35678 Points ∼99% -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
34071 Points ∼95% -5%
Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (20039 - 38275, n=38)
33051 Points ∼92% -8%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (1925 - 43077, n=188, az elmúlt 2 évben)
27226 Points ∼76% -24%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
25793 Points ∼72% -28%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
169244 Points ∼100% +26%
Gigabyte A7 X1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
134236 Points ∼79%
Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (45531 - 179716, n=26)
114450 Points ∼68% -15%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
110773 Points ∼65% -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
106962 Points ∼63% -20%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (23059 - 192950, n=157, az elmúlt 2 évben)
105139 Points ∼62% -22%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
95835 Points ∼57% -29%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
27968 Points ∼100% +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
26771 Points ∼96% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
25849 Points ∼92% 0%
Gigabyte A7 X1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
25794 Points ∼92%
Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (16628 - 29128, n=37)
24520 Points ∼88% -5%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (1360 - 34993, n=201, az elmúlt 2 évben)
20514 Points ∼73% -20%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
19737 Points ∼71% -23%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
10898 Points ∼100% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
10752 Points ∼99% +2%
Gigabyte A7 X1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
10570 Points ∼97%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
9619 Points ∼88% -9%
Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (6059 - 11019, n=38)
9452 Points ∼87% -11%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (429 - 13210, n=205, az elmúlt 2 évben)
7843 Points ∼72% -26%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
7582 Points ∼70% -28%
3DMark 11 Performance
26404 pontok
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
54931 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23233 pontok
3DMark Time Spy Score
10315 pontok
Segítség
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
103 (33.5min, 51.4P0.1, 68P1 - 190max) fps ∼100% +7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
101 fps ∼98% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
97.9 (84min) fps ∼95% +2%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
95.9 (80min) fps ∼93%
Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (73.5 - 109, n=38)
92.3 fps ∼90% -4%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (24.3 - 123, n=196, az elmúlt 2 évben)
78.7 fps ∼76% -18%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
74 fps ∼72% -23%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
128 (112.9min) fps ∼100% +13%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
121 (106.3min) fps ∼95% +7%
Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (103 - 158, n=39)
120 fps ∼94% +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
119 (104.1min) fps ∼93% +5%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (22 - 158, n=177, az elmúlt 2 évben)
117 fps ∼91% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
115 (99.6min) fps ∼90% +2%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
113 (100.7min) fps ∼88%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
97 fps ∼100%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
91.6 fps ∼94%
Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (62 - 107, n=31)
87.1 fps ∼90%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (15.4 - 115, n=108, az elmúlt 2 évben)
80.6 fps ∼83%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
72.3 fps ∼75%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
97 (8.76min, 66.7P1 - 172max) fps ∼100% +16%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
91.9 (26.9min, 66.7P1 - 171max) fps ∼95% +10%
Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (72.6 - 114, n=33)
89.8 fps ∼93% +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
88.5 (16.4min, 58.8P1 - 182max) fps ∼91% +6%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (4.18 - 114, n=115, az elmúlt 2 évben)
84.9 fps ∼88% +2%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
83.6 (9.74min, 58.8P1 - 149max) fps ∼86%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
80.4 (8.99min, 55.6P1 - 149max) fps ∼83% -4%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
185 (39.2min, 139P1 - 321max) fps ∼100%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
168 (84.4min, 126P1 - 285max) fps ∼91% -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
168 (63.8min, 123P1 - 334max) fps ∼91% -9%
Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (105 - 194, n=29)
162 fps ∼88% -12%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (10.9 - 219, n=95, az elmúlt 2 évben)
149 fps ∼81% -19%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
130 (88.3min, 98.4P1 - 218max) fps ∼70% -30%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
80.1 fps ∼100% +11%
Átlagos NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (62.7 - 105, n=41)
77.6 fps ∼97% +7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
75.8 fps ∼95% +5%
Az osztály átlaga Gaming
  (13.7 - 113, n=179, az elmúlt 2 évben)
75.4 fps ∼94% +4%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
72.2 fps ∼90%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
72.1 fps ∼90% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
69.9 fps ∼87% -3%

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

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
Gigabyte A7 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø95.1 (87-99)
alacsony közepes magas ultra
GTA V (2015) 174 164 139 83.6 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 95.9 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 139 125 119 113 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 98.9 86.8 72.2 fps
Strange Brigade (2018) 311 232 208 185 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 (2020) 104.5 89.6 77.1 66.3 fps

Zajszint

Üresjárat
25 / 29 / 35 dB(A)
Terhelés
58 / 59 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
csendes
40 dB(A)
hallható
50 dB(A)
hangos
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm távolságról)   környezeti zaj: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.933.836.534.735.344.62535.43532.334.633.138.63145.143.142.442.240.645.64032.13027.128.427.533.85030.724.421.223.822.230.66336.428.822.728.523.937.7804319.217.218.616.542.810029.220.817.91816.330.512532.522.9191716.132.216033.623.721.518.217.834.420034.322.220.221.719.136.125035.723.518.820.216.137.131536.922.416.513.912.538.740039.222.116.612.311.940.550042.723.317.312.212.544.163044.22417.512.311.444.880045.124.717.812.311.245.3100048.627.22013.810.849.112505026.718.413.51249.8160048.726.216.511.911.649.6200047.923.113.912.311.848.6250046.219.41312.31247.4315047.918.614.912.912.348.9400046.618.215.513.812.647.4500042.914.313.613.612.943.4630040.613.713.213.312.941.5800038.313.413.413.312.939.11000034.61313.313.312.734.61250031.812.613.112.912.431.51600028.412.312.812.512.125.5SPL58.334.728.225.424.558.9N12.11.910.70.612.7median 40.6median 22.2median 16.5median 13.3median 12.5median 41.5Delta6.23.72.41.716.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseGigabyte A7 X1
Max. terhelés
 41 °C42 °C44 °C 
 40 °C43 °C42 °C 
 35 °C39 °C34 °C 
Maximum: 44 °C
Átlag: 40 °C
49 °C42 °C42 °C
38 °C40 °C41 °C
36 °C39 °C34 °C
Maximum: 49 °C
Átlag: 40.1 °C
Tápegység (max.)  54 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900