Notebookcheck

Cubot King Kong Smartphone rövid értékelés

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Stefanie Voigt (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 06/27/2018
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Erős, mint egy gorilla? Megfizethető és robusztus, így reklámozza magát a Cubot King Kong. Ez egy 5 colos okostelefon, átlagos lapkakészlettel, egy nehéz, víz- és porálló házban. Vajon tényleg elég kemény a mindennapi élet kihívásaihoz?

Cubot King Kong
Processzor
Mediatek MT6580M
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-400 MP2
Memória
2048 MB 
Kijelző
5 hüvelyk 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, kapacitív, IPS, fényes: igen
Háttértár
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm-es kombinált audio jack, Kártyaolvasó: microSD, max. 64 GB, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: gyorsulásmérő, közelségérzékelő, iránytű
Hálózat
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​1700/​1900/​2100), Dual SIM, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 14.85 x 153 x 80.2
Akkumulátor
16.7 Wh, 4400 mAh Lítium-Polimer
Operációs rendszer
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, kontraszt AF, LED vaku, videók: 720p
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: mono, a hátoldalon, Billentyűzet: virtuális, hálózati töltő, USB kábel, mini csavarhúzó, SAR: 0.72 W/kg (test), 0.31 W/kg (fej); IP68 minősítés, fanless, ruggedized
Súly
246 g, Tápegység: 52 g
Ár
119 Euró
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=292)
200 MBit/s ∼100% +268%
Oukitel WP5000
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
114 MBit/s ∼57% +110%
Ulefone Armor X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
98.3 MBit/s ∼49% +81%
Cubot King Kong
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.4 MBit/s ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Mali-T720, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s ∼25% -10%
CAT S31
Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 16 GB eMMC Flash
41.6 MBit/s ∼21% -24%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=292)
195 MBit/s ∼100% +238%
Oukitel WP5000
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s ∼56% +89%
Ulefone Armor X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
103 MBit/s ∼53% +79%
Cubot King Kong
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
57.7 MBit/s ∼30%
CAT S31
Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 16 GB eMMC Flash
39.3 MBit/s ∼20% -32%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Mali-T720, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
37.9 MBit/s ∼19% -34%
GPS Cubot King Kong – overview
GPS Cubot King Kong – overview
GPS Cubot King Kong – woods
GPS Cubot King Kong – woods
GPS Cubot King Kong – bridge
GPS Cubot King Kong – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – woods
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – woods
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
454
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 466 cd/m² Átlag: 448.9 cd/m² Minimum: 18.25 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 90 %
Centrumban: 466 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1864:1 (Fekete: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.03 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
91.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Cubot King Kong
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Oukitel WP5000
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
CAT S31
IPS, 1280x720, 4.7
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Ulefone Armor X
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Screen
-60%
19%
-25%
9%
Brightness middle
466
506
9%
784
68%
445
-5%
564
21%
Brightness
449
503
12%
750
67%
437
-3%
541
20%
Brightness Distribution
90
86
-4%
92
2%
88
-2%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.25
0.97
-288%
0.45
-80%
0.67
-168%
0.37
-48%
Contrast
1864
522
-72%
1742
-7%
664
-64%
1524
-18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.03
9.4
-34%
4.28
39%
6.5
8%
5.1
27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
16.25
19.9
-22%
8.75
46%
10.6
35%
9.6
41%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.1
13
-83%
6.1
14%
7.2
-1%
5.4
24%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.59 85%
2.49 88%
2.53 87%
2.1 105%
CCT
7244 90%
10219 64%
7175 91%
8274 79%
7755 84%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8627 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 43 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
23540 Points ∼32%
Oukitel WP5000
57489 Points ∼77% +144%
CAT S31
24865 Points ∼33% +6%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
35379 Points ∼48% +50%
Ulefone Armor X
37586 Points ∼51% +60%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (15185 - 25237, n=10)
22450 Points ∼30% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 250848, n=378)
74328 Points ∼100% +216%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
21088 Points ∼19%
Oukitel WP5000
78088 Points ∼70% +270%
Ulefone Armor X
46435 Points ∼41% +120%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (17073 - 21088, n=4)
19302 Points ∼17% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=153)
112012 Points ∼100% +431%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
0 Points ∼0%
Oukitel WP5000
4174 Points ∼93%
CAT S31
2300 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
3446 Points ∼77%
Ulefone Armor X
3184 Points ∼71%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (0 - 0, n=2)
0 Points ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone (4936 - 9868, n=237)
4476 Points ∼100%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
3041 Points ∼61%
Oukitel WP5000
4947 Points ∼100% +63%
CAT S31
3080 Points ∼62% +1%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
4508 Points ∼91% +48%
Ulefone Armor X
4298 Points ∼87% +41%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2516 - 3041, n=10)
2719 Points ∼55% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (4101 - 13211, n=404)
4840 Points ∼98% +59%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
567 Points ∼64%
Oukitel WP5000
888 Points ∼100% +57%
CAT S31
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
661 Points ∼74% +17%
Ulefone Armor X
7 Points ∼1% -99%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (9 - 640, n=10)
404 Points ∼45% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=481)
687 Points ∼77% +21%
Graphics (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
138 Points ∼8%
Oukitel WP5000
1120 Points ∼67% +712%
CAT S31
256 Points ∼15% +86%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
253 Points ∼15% +83%
Ulefone Armor X
188 Points ∼11% +36%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (136 - 145, n=10)
140 Points ∼8% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=481)
1667 Points ∼100% +1108%
Memory (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
403 Points ∼33%
Oukitel WP5000
1229 Points ∼100% +205%
CAT S31
328 Points ∼27% -19%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
1066 Points ∼87% +165%
Ulefone Armor X
900 Points ∼73% +123%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (189 - 404, n=10)
332 Points ∼27% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=481)
1197 Points ∼97% +197%
System (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
985 Points ∼31%
Oukitel WP5000
3225 Points ∼100% +227%
CAT S31
899 Points ∼28% -9%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
1396 Points ∼43% +42%
Ulefone Armor X
1491 Points ∼46% +51%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (958 - 1011, n=10)
980 Points ∼30% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=481)
2422 Points ∼75% +146%
Overall (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
420 Points ∼30%
Oukitel WP5000
1409 Points ∼100% +235%
CAT S31
1 Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
706 Points ∼50% +68%
Ulefone Armor X
206 Points ∼15% -51%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (144 - 432, n=10)
323 Points ∼23% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=485)
1212 Points ∼86% +189%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
773 Points ∼18%
Oukitel WP5000
2663 Points ∼62% +245%
Ulefone Armor X
1416 Points ∼33% +83%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (773 - 875, n=4)
836 Points ∼19% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=178)
4299 Points ∼100% +456%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
1237 Points ∼29%
Oukitel WP5000
3943 Points ∼94% +219%
CAT S31
1135 Points ∼27% -8%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
1855 Points ∼44% +50%
Ulefone Armor X
1847 Points ∼44% +49%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (1131 - 1237, n=4)
1166 Points ∼28% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 11598, n=228)
4210 Points ∼100% +240%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
425 Points ∼34%
Oukitel WP5000
863 Points ∼69% +103%
CAT S31
437 Points ∼35% +3%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
629 Points ∼51% +48%
Ulefone Armor X
662 Points ∼53% +56%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (394 - 431, n=4)
419 Points ∼34% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=229)
1244 Points ∼100% +193%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
8112 Points ∼64%
Oukitel WP5000
Points ∼0% -100%
CAT S31
6396 Points ∼51% -21%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
11459 Points ∼91% +41%
Ulefone Armor X
10195 Points ∼81% +26%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (7498 - 8913, n=10)
7999 Points ∼63% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (7095 - 36762, n=520)
12608 Points ∼100% +55%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
2396 Points ∼14%
Oukitel WP5000
Points ∼0% -100%
CAT S31
5042 Points ∼29% +110%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
3985 Points ∼23% +66%
Ulefone Armor X
3585 Points ∼21% +50%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2396 - 2485, n=10)
2463 Points ∼14% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=520)
17305 Points ∼100% +622%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
2841 Points ∼20%
Oukitel WP5000
Points ∼0% -100%
CAT S31
5291 Points ∼36% +86%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
4661 Points ∼32% +64%
Ulefone Armor X
4188 Points ∼29% +47%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2841 - 2946, n=10)
2910 Points ∼20% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=521)
14568 Points ∼100% +413%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
4.2 fps ∼14%
Oukitel WP5000
24 fps ∼80% +471%
CAT S31
5.6 fps ∼19% +33%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
6.8 fps ∼23% +62%
Ulefone Armor X
5.9 fps ∼20% +40%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (4.1 - 11, n=10)
5 fps ∼17% +19%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=546)
30.1 fps ∼100% +617%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
7.5 fps ∼24%
Oukitel WP5000
31 fps ∼100% +313%
CAT S31
9.8 fps ∼32% +31%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
11 fps ∼35% +47%
Ulefone Armor X
9.2 fps ∼30% +23%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (4.4 - 12, n=10)
8.57 fps ∼28% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=549)
24.4 fps ∼79% +225%

Legend

 
Cubot King Kong Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel WP5000 Mediatek Helio P25, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
CAT S31 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Armor X Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=403)
36 Points ∼100% +181%
Oukitel WP5000 (Chrome 66)
26.91 Points ∼75% +110%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58)
20.988 Points ∼58% +64%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
18.148 Points ∼50% +42%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (10.8 - 14.5, n=10)
13.2 Points ∼37% +3%
Cubot King Kong (Chrome 66)
12.789 Points ∼36%
CAT S31
12.442 Points ∼35% -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=539)
5398 Points ∼100% +144%
Oukitel WP5000 (Chrome 66)
5132 Points ∼95% +132%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
3151 Points ∼58% +43%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58)
3133 Points ∼58% +42%
Cubot King Kong (Chrome 66)
2208 Points ∼41%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (1645 - 2280, n=10)
2066 Points ∼38% -6%
CAT S31
2010 Points ∼37% -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Cubot King Kong (Chrome 66)
18388.4 ms * ∼100%
CAT S31
17827.9 ms * ∼97% +3%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (14579 - 21257, n=10)
16774 ms * ∼91% +9%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
15875.7 ms * ∼86% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=558)
11643 ms * ∼63% +37%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58)
11130 ms * ∼61% +39%
Oukitel WP5000 (Chrome 66)
10209.2 ms * ∼56% +44%

* ... smaller is better

Cubot King KongOukitel WP5000CAT S31Samsung Galaxy XCover 4Ulefone Armor XAverage 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
177%
159%
172%
203%
96%
183%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
10.3 (Kingston 32GB)
20.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
99%
59.5
478%
55.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
440%
62.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
507%
36.8 (6.38 - 65.4, n=108)
257%
45 (3.4 - 87.1, n=309)
337%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
20.6 (Kingston 32GB)
21.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
81.8
297%
68.97 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
235%
81.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
296%
55.5 (10.8 - 87.7, n=108)
169%
63.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=309)
207%
Random Write 4KB
7
9.89
41%
14.81
112%
11.9
70%
10.17
45%
7.32 (0.49 - 37.9, n=223)
5%
15 (0.14 - 164, n=588)
114%
Random Read 4KB
17.2
66.88
289%
14.28
-17%
21.8
27%
14.7
-15%
19.7 (2.49 - 61.7, n=223)
15%
36.8 (1.59 - 173, n=588)
114%
Sequential Write 256KB
32.6
162.14
397%
62.13
91%
73.6
126%
82.85
154%
41.5 (8.74 - 97.6, n=223)
27%
77.3 (2.99 - 246, n=588)
137%
Sequential Read 256KB
77.3
257.52
233%
71.06
-8%
181.6
135%
255.34
230%
157 (9.66 - 294, n=223)
103%
223 (12.1 - 895, n=588)
188%
Max. terhelés
 34 °C32.5 °C33.1 °C 
 34.9 °C32.4 °C33.6 °C 
 34.7 °C32.5 °C33 °C 
Maximum: 34.9 °C
Átlag: 33.4 °C
31.4 °C31.6 °C34.9 °C
31.3 °C31.7 °C36.9 °C
31.7 °C32.1 °C35.4 °C
Maximum: 36.9 °C
Átlag: 33 °C
Tápegység (max.)  35.6 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.740.5253537.63135.637.24033.128.4503430.66332.328.58019.823.510019.222.612517.821.916014.121.720014.82525012.630.331511.339.240010.847.650010.252.76309.459.1800964.110008.364.712508.363.216008.262.62000861.925008.162.33150863.74000864.750007.964.66300860.880008.353.4100008.349.7125008.343.7160008.326.8SPL68.32174.4N21.60.331.4median 8.3median 53.4Delta1.814.231.634.125.433.425.332.332.927.633.628.131.634.428.430.12736.520.833.42241.221.347.620.852.121.255.219.457.419.560.317.765.417.968.617.87017.370.617.47216.771.317.269.718.27117.972.417.666.317.761.417.857.917.95818.149.218.246.63080.41.347.4median 17.9median 60.31.310.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseCubot King KongSamsung Galaxy XCover 4
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Cubot King Kong audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.05 / 0.2 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.6 / 1.8 Watt
Terhelés midlight 3.8 / 5.5 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Cubot King Kong
4400 mAh
Oukitel WP5000
5200 mAh
CAT S31
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
2800 mAh
Ulefone Armor X
5500 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6580M
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-28%
-4%
0%
-30%
-15%
-11%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
1.18
-69%
0.73
-4%
0.56
20%
1.22
-74%
0.816 (0.56 - 1.1, n=10)
-17%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=624)
-26%
Idle Average *
1.6
2.17
-36%
2.21
-38%
1.57
2%
2.07
-29%
1.76 (1.36 - 2.26, n=10)
-10%
1.722 (0.6 - 6.2, n=623)
-8%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
2.26
-26%
2.25
-25%
1.68
7%
2.14
-19%
2.11 (1.38 - 2.39, n=10)
-17%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=624)
-11%
Load Average *
3.8
3.68
3%
2.99
21%
4.6
-21%
4.92
-29%
4.85 (3.11 - 6.97, n=10)
-28%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=618)
-6%
Load Maximum *
5.5
6.06
-10%
4.12
25%
5.92
-8%
5.4
2%
5.69 (3.59 - 7.03, n=10)
-3%
5.72 (1.2 - 14.2, n=618)
-4%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
18h 18min
Cubot King Kong
4400 mAh
Oukitel WP5000
5200 mAh
CAT S31
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
2800 mAh
Ulefone Armor X
5500 mAh
Battery Runtime
8%
-2%
-39%
-23%
Reader / Idle
1388
WiFi v1.3
1098
1189
8%
1074
-2%
668
-39%
845
-23%
Load
205
H.264
681

Pro

+ nagyon jó üzemidő
+ kis fogyasztás
+ jó hívásminőség
+ IP68 minősítés
+ megfizethető ár
+ tiszta Android
+ kontrasztos kijelző

Kontra

- szemcsés, elmosódott fotók
- lassú töltődés
- nincs LTE
- viszonylag kis teljesítmény
- a kijelző viszonylag védtelen
- csak érintőgombos kezelés
- elavult szoftver
- a kijelző láthatóan elszíneződött
Review: Cubot King Kong
Review: Cubot King Kong

Ne hagyjuk magunkat megvezetni a Cubot King Kong által: a nehéz ház ellenére a kijelző alig védett, az érintőgombok miatt pedig kényelmetlen kesztyűben használni. A teljesítménye is alacsony, és nem ideális világos környezetben sem. Más gyártók készülékei jobban megérdemlik a "kültéri okostelefon" megnevezést. Azt viszont érdemes számításba venni, hogy azért a telefon IP68 tanúsított, az üzemideje hosszú, és a rajta lévő Android tiszta.

Ez minden, amire számíthatunk ettől a telefontól. A kamera finoman szólva is mosott képeket csinál, a hangszóró nem méltó a nevéhez - nagyon halk, bár megfelelő minőségben szól. Az LTE támogatás hiánya egyesek számára automatikusan kizáró ok lehet.

Ebben az árfekvésben egyes korlátokat el kell fogadni. Ennek ellenére a Cubot King Kong remek üzemidőt kínál, valamint víz- és porálló.

Ha olyan okostelefont keresünk, amelyet durva körülmények között is használhatunk, akkor valószínűleg megéri kicsit többet költeni egy tényleg mindenhol használható eszközre. Amennyiben viszont csak ügyetlenek vagyunk, vagy a masszív design tetszik, akkor egy jó telefont kaphatunk alacsony áron.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Cubot King Kong - 06/19/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Váz
84%
Billentyűzet
65 / 75 → 87%
Érintőpad
87%
Csatlakoztathatóság
31 / 60 → 51%
Súly
87%
Akkumulátor
100%
Kijelző
82%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
4 / 63 → 7%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
24 / 70 → 34%
Hőmérséklet
91%
Zaj
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
39%
Átlag
66%
76%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Cubot King Kong Smartphone rövid értékelés
Florian Wimmer, 2018-06-27 (Update: 2018-06-27)