Notebookcheck

Chuwi HiPad Plus Android 10 Tablet rövid értékelés: Az iPad Klón

Vajon a HiPhone lesz a következő? 269 dolláros árával a HiPad Plus a lehető legközelebb kerül az iPad vagy Galaxy Tab felhasználói élményéhez, anélkül, hogy kétszer vagy háromszor annyit költenénk rá. Viszont az üveg érintőképernyő törékenynek tűnik, és a maximális fényerő alacsonyabb, mint más táblagépeken.
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (fordította Zoltán Kiss), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Tablet Chinese Tech
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Processzor
Mediatek MT8183 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4
Kijelző
11.00 hüvelyk 4:3, 2176 x 1600 pixel 246 PPI, 10 pontos kapacitív, IPS, fényes: igen, 60 Hz
Háttértár
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Kártyaolvasó: MicroSD, Szenzorok: Gyorsulásmérő
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 6.95 x 248.3 x 179.5
Akkumulátor
7300 mAh Lítium-Polimer
Operációs rendszer
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: 1 W x 2, 12 Hónap Garancia
Súly
505 g
Ár
269 USD
Hivatkozások
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
hasonló találatok
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
75 %
07/2021
Chuwi HiPad Plus
MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3
505 g6.95 mm11.00"2176x1600
77 %
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
Helio MT8766B, PowerVR GE8300
462 g9.35 mm10.10"1280x800
78 %
Allview iPlay 20
SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322
444 g7.95 mm10.10"1920x1200
82 %
10/2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
SD 662, Adreno 610
477 g7 mm10.40"2000x1200
88 %
10/2020
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU
495 g7.5 mm10.20"2160x1620
85 %
05/2020
Huawei MatePad 10.4
Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6
460 g7.35 mm10.40"2000x1200

Size Comparison

250.6 mm 174.1 mm 7.5 mm 495 g248.3 mm 179.5 mm 6.95 mm 505 g247.6 mm 157.4 mm 7 mm 477 g245.2 mm 149.4 mm 7.95 mm 444 g243.3 mm 161.2 mm 9.35 mm 462 g245.2 mm 155 mm 7.35 mm 460 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
459 (223min - 497max) MBit/s ∼100% +108%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
332 (310min - 353max) MBit/s ∼72% +50%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
264 (204min - 332max) MBit/s ∼58% +19%
Chuwi HiPad Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
221 MBit/s ∼48%
Allview iPlay 20
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
99.9 MBit/s ∼22% -55%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
342 (291min - 400max) MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
329 (323min - 333max) MBit/s ∼96% +3%
Chuwi HiPad Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
318 MBit/s ∼93%
Allview iPlay 20
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
295 MBit/s ∼86% -7%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
56.5 (48min - 74max) MBit/s ∼17% -82%
ColorChecker
26.1 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
23 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
17 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
12 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
16 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Chuwi HiPad Plus: 14.87 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 26.08 ∆E
342
cd/m²
304.2
cd/m²
301.6
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
300.2
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
331.2
cd/m²
299.7
cd/m²
284.4
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 342 cd/m² Átlag: 308.5 cd/m² Minimum: 50.4 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 80 %
Centrumban: 300.2 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 910:1 (Fekete: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.23 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
Gamma: 2.43
Chuwi HiPad Plus
2176x1600, 11.00
Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020
1280x800, 10.10
Allview iPlay 20
1920x1200, 10.10
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
2000x1200, 10.40
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
2160x1620, 10.20
Huawei MatePad 10.4
2000x1200, 10.40
Response Times
4%
31%
8%
35%
33%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
55.2 (26.8, 28.4)
50.4 (23.6, 26.8)
9%
29.6 (14.8, 14.8)
46%
47.6 (22.4, 25.2)
14%
39.2 (18.8, 20.4)
29%
38.4 (13.2, 25.2)
30%
Response Time Black / White *
33.2 (16.4, 16.8)
34 (18.8, 15.2)
-2%
28 (18, 10)
16%
32.8 (16.4, 16.4)
1%
20 (7.6, 12.4)
40%
21.6 (7.6, 14)
35%
PWM Frequency
Screen
28%
15%
18%
27%
7%
Brightness middle
300.2
375
25%
396
32%
365
22%
477
59%
511
70%
Brightness
308
362
18%
389
26%
337
9%
452
47%
472
53%
Brightness Distribution
80
87
9%
90
13%
82
3%
86
8%
85
6%
Black Level *
0.33
0.17
48%
0.44
-33%
0.26
21%
0.5
-52%
0.53
-61%
Contrast
910
2206
142%
900
-1%
1404
54%
954
5%
964
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.23
5.6
-7%
2.39
54%
4.5
14%
2.2
58%
4.6
12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.42
10.6
-26%
7.81
7%
7.8
7%
5
41%
10.3
-22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.1
5
18%
4.7
23%
5.3
13%
3.3
46%
6.5
-7%
Gamma
2.43 91%
2.17 101%
2.24 98%
2.12 104%
2.23 99%
2.19 100%
CCT
7873 83%
7667 85%
7326 89%
7702 84%
7019 93%
7553 86%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
16% / 23%
23% / 18%
13% / 16%
31% / 28%
20% / 12%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 16.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.8 ms rise
↘ 28.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 14804 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Grayscale (against sRGB)
Grayscale (against sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (against sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (against sRGB)
ColorChecker (against sRGB)
ColorChecker (against sRGB)
Outdoors on a cloudy day
Outdoors on a cloudy day
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors on a cloudy day
Outdoors on a cloudy day
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6379 Points ∼83%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
4656 Points ∼61% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
6193 Points ∼80% -3%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
7695 Points ∼100% +21%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
5056 Points ∼66% -21%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1641 Points ∼25%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
614 Points ∼9% -63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
1858 Points ∼28% +13%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
6636 Points ∼100% +304%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
3338 Points ∼50% +103%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
1610 Points ∼24% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1503 Points ∼15%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
533 Points ∼5% -65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
1729 Points ∼17% +15%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
10023 Points ∼100% +567%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
3327 Points ∼33% +121%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
1434 Points ∼14% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2416 Points ∼72%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
1309 Points ∼39% -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
2517 Points ∼75% +4%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3040 Points ∼90% +26%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
3375 Points ∼100% +40%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
2818 Points ∼83% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1639 Points ∼47%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
766 Points ∼22% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
1906 Points ∼55% +16%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
3483 Points ∼100% +113%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
1641 Points ∼47% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1502 Points ∼44%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
681 Points ∼20% -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
1790 Points ∼53% +19%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
3406 Points ∼100% +127%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
1455 Points ∼43% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2409 Points ∼64%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
1356 Points ∼36% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
2466 Points ∼65% +2%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
3782 Points ∼100% +57%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
2963 Points ∼78% +23%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
26 fps ∼43%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
19 fps ∼32% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
33 fps ∼55% +27%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +131%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
57 fps ∼95% +119%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
37 fps ∼62% +42%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
37 fps ∼15%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
20 fps ∼8% -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
35 fps ∼15% -5%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
239 fps ∼100% +546%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
87 fps ∼36% +135%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
38 fps ∼16% +3%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
9.4 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
18 fps ∼31%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
58 fps ∼100%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
49 fps ∼84%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
21 fps ∼36%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼16%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
9.6 fps ∼7% -54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
19 fps ∼15% -10%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
131 fps ∼100% +524%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
47 fps ∼36% +124%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
20 fps ∼15% -5%
GFXBench 3.1 - off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
12 fps ∼14%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
6.5 fps ∼8% -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
13 fps ∼15% +8%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
85.82 fps ∼100% +615%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
35 fps ∼41% +192%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
12 fps ∼14% 0%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.8 fps ∼15%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
2.7 fps ∼9% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
6.7 fps ∼21% +40%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
31.72 fps ∼100% +561%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
19 fps ∼60% +296%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
7.4 fps ∼23% +54%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7.7 fps ∼15%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
2.8 fps ∼5% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
7.2 fps ∼14% -6%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
51.34 fps ∼100% +567%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
21 fps ∼41% +173%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
7.4 fps ∼14% -4%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.2 fps ∼14%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
3.2 fps ∼9% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
7.8 fps ∼21% +50%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
37.01 fps ∼100% +612%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
20 fps ∼54% +285%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
7.4 fps ∼20% +42%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼13%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
3.3 fps ∼5% -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
8.4 fps ∼13% +2%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
62.4 fps ∼100% +661%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
22 fps ∼35% +168%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
7.6 fps ∼12% -7%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼12%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
2 fps ∼8% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
4.6 fps ∼18% +48%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
25.34 fps ∼100% +717%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
13 fps ∼51% +319%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
4.3 fps ∼17% +39%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Chuwi HiPad Plus
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2.8 fps ∼12%
Allview iPlay 20
UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096
1.2 fps ∼5% -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
2.9 fps ∼13% +4%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
23.09 fps ∼100% +725%
Huawei MatePad 10.4
HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 3072
7.8 fps ∼34% +179%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mediatek MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 2048
2.6 fps ∼11% -7%
Chuwi HiPad PlusAlcatel 3T 10 4G 2020Allview iPlay 20Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)Huawei MatePad 10.4Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
AndroBench 3-5
-15%
-39%
96%
85%
32%
Sequential Read 256KB
253.48
287.27
13%
123.27
-51%
298.03
18%
286.03
13%
266.16
5%
Sequential Write 256KB
141.23
104
-26%
160.32
14%
89.89
-36%
97.2
-31%
180.1
28%
Random Read 4KB
41.25
36.01
-13%
25.43
-38%
81.96
99%
67.76
64%
74.99
82%
Random Write 4KB
20.78
13.54
-35%
4.27
-79%
83.62
302%
81.56
292%
23.28
12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.42 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81.42 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
70.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
70.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
51.96 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
Max. terhelés
 30.8 °C24.8 °C25.4 °C 
 29.6 °C24.6 °C25 °C 
 26.2 °C24.8 °C25.8 °C 
Maximum: 30.8 °C
Átlag: 26.3 °C
24.2 °C26.2 °C31.4 °C
24.2 °C26.2 °C30.4 °C
24.4 °C25.8 °C28.2 °C
Maximum: 31.4 °C
Átlag: 26.8 °C
Szobahőmérséklet 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the average of 30.5 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34.5 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.5 °C / 87 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.536.337.52532.431.932.43129.724.329.74033.423.833.45034.528.134.56339.136.939.18035.228.635.210035.324.435.312537.832.137.816042.520.842.520055.11955.125059.718.859.731565.119.965.140066.218.866.250065.516.665.563067.615.667.680068.915.268.9100072.314.572.3125076.314.176.3160078.514.178.5200081.213.981.2250080.214.280.2315080.213.580.2400086.213.486.2500079.713.279.7630074.813.274.8800073.31373.31000077.61377.61250071.912.871.91600056.112.156.1SPL91.52791.5N84.10.984.1median 71.9median 14.2median 71.9Delta10.62.810.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseChuwi HiPad PlusApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Chuwi HiPad Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Chuwi HiPad Plus
7300 mAh
Apple iPad Air 2019
8134 mAh
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
8827 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
7538 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8000 mAh
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
7250 mAh
Power Consumption
1%
-4%
-9%
16%
16%
Idle Minimum *
2.6
2.18
16%
2.12
18%
1.3
50%
1.16
55%
1.98
24%
Idle Average *
5.9
6.4
-8%
6.43
-9%
3.5
41%
4.42
25%
5.66
4%
Idle Maximum *
6.1
6.43
-5%
6.69
-10%
5.6
8%
4.43
27%
5.69
7%
Load Average *
7.8
7.48
4%
8.17
-5%
12.5
-60%
8.86
-14%
6.96
11%
Load Maximum *
10.4
10.65
-2%
11.84
-14%
19.2
-85%
11.6
-12%
6.98
33%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Huawei MatePad 10.4
Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6,  Wh
1190 min ∼45% +124%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 32.9 Wh
782 min ∼30% +47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)
SD 662, Adreno 610,  Wh
757 min ∼29% +43%
Chuwi HiPad Plus
MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3,  Wh
531 min ∼20%
Akkumulátor üzemidő
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 51min

Pro

+ minőségi 2K felbontású kijelző
+ szolid alumínium fémváz
+ jó teljesítmény-ár arány
+ viszonylag olcsó
+ Android 10
+ hangos sztereó hangszórók
+ MicroSD olvasó

Kontra

- az üveg érintőképernyő-felület görbülésre hajlamos
- az RGB egyensúly és a szürkeárnyalat jobb lehetne
- a kijelző lehetne élénkebb a kültéri használatra
- az USB-C külső monitor nem támogatott
- közepes-erős „ghosting”
- gyenge vibrációs visszajelzés
- nincs fényérzékelő
- nincs 3.5 mm-es audió jack
- nincs beépített GPS

Összegzés

In review: Chuwi HiPad Plus tablet. Test unit provided by Chuwi
In review: Chuwi HiPad Plus tablet. Test unit provided by Chuwi

Szolid alternatívája a Samsung Galaxy Tab A sorozatnak, és emellett egy nagy ugrás az eredeti 2019-es HiPad-hez képest a kijelző minősége és a teljesítmény terén.

Vonzó ára mellett a HiPad Plus a kijelző minőségében, a vizuális formatervezésben és a teljesítményben is jeleskedik, amelyek egy jó táblagép három legfontosabb ismérvei. Távolról sem a legjobbak az adott kategóriában, viszont még így is meggyőzőek ahhoz képest, hogy mennyibe kerülnek.

Minden más ezen a táblagépen éppen csak átlagos, vagy annál valamivel gyengébb. A fényerő például nem elég erős a kültéri használathoz, és a színek sem olyan pontosak, mint amilyenek lehetnének, lévén hogy adott a teljes sRGB lefedettség. Másodsorban, hiányoznak olyan gyakori funkciók, mint a 3.5 mm-es jack, az automatikus fényérzékelő, a GPS és az ujjlenyomat-olvasó. A HiPad Plus leginkább beltéri használatra való, elsősorban böngészésre és videó streaming-re.

Ár és elérhetőség

Banggood és egyéb tengerentúli terjesztők jelenleg 249-től 299 dollárig fogadják az előrendeléseket. A felhasználók a hivatalos termékismertető oldalon többet megtudhatnak a táblagépről.

Chuwi HiPad Plus - 02/16/2021 v7
Allen Ngo

Váz
78 / 98 → 79%
Billentyűzet
71 / 80 → 89%
Érintőpad
61%
Csatlakoztathatóság
29 / 70 → 42%
Súly
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Akkumulátor
84%
Kijelző
80%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
12 / 78 → 15%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
59 / 92 → 64%
Hőmérséklet
96%
Zaj
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 82%
Camera
47 / 85 → 55%
Átlag
67%
75%
Tablet - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Allen Ngo
Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 4582 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011
contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC
Ninh Duy
Translator: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 186543 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Chuwi HiPad Plus Android 10 Tablet rövid értékelés: Az iPad Klón
Allen Ngo, 2021-07- 1 (Update: 2021-07- 1)