Notebookcheck

Amazon Fire HD 10 (2019) Tablet rövid értékelés: Egy 10 hüvelykes tablet kedvező áron

Mindenes szórakoztató. A Fire HD 10 (2019) egyike a legolcsóbb 10 hüvelykes tableteknek a piacon, az Amazon által 149.99 dollárra árazva. Habár ez az ár kizárja a Fire HD 10 (2019)-et a csúcskategóriából, elég sok tulajdonsággal rendelkezik ahhoz, hogy biztosítsa a legtöbb embert szórakozását. Tovább olvasva kiderül, hogy kinek a legmegfelelőbb a Fire HD 10 (2019).
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (fordította Zoltán Kiss),
Android Tablet Touchscreen
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Fire Széria)
Processzor
Mediatek MT8183 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Grafikus adapter
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Memória
2048 MB 
Kijelző
10.1 hüvelyk 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, kapacitív, IPS, Polarizáló szűrő, teljesen laminált kijelző, fényes: igen
Háttértár
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 25.7 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5 mm jack, Kártyaolvasó: microSD kártyák 512 GB-ig. FAT és FAT32 fájlrendszerek támogatva, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: gyorsulásmérő, DRM Widevine L1, Kamera2 API: Teljes, Amazon Alexa
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 9.8 x 262 x 159
Akkumulátor
6300 mAh Lítium-Polimer, Akkumulátor üzemidő (gyártói adat): 12 h
Operációs rendszer
Amazon Fire OS 7
Camera
Primary Camera: 2 MPix 720p videók
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix 720p videók
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: Sztereó hangszórók, Billentyűzet: virtuális, Moduláris tápegység (5.2 V/1.8 A), USB kábel (A-ról C-re), Rövid Kezelési Útmutató, Fire OS 7.3, 12 Hónap Garancia, fanless
Súly
504 g, Tápegység: 35 g
Ár
149.99 Euró
Hivatkozások
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
79 %
01/2020
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3
504 g9.8 mm10.1"1920x1200
75 %
04/2018
Alcatel 1T 10
MT8321, Mali-400 MP
415 g9.4 mm10.1"1280x800
78 %
11/2017
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
MT8173, PowerVR GX6250
497 g9.8 mm10.1"1920x1200
81 %
09/2018
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2
475 g7.7 mm10.1"1920x1200
77 %
03/2019
Lenovo Tab M10
SD 450, Adreno 506
480 g8.1 mm10.1"1920x1200
81 %
03/2019
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2
460 g7.5 mm10.1"1920x1200

Size Comparison

262 mm 159 mm 9.8 mm 504 g262 mm 159 mm 9.8 mm 497 g255 mm 155 mm 9.4 mm 415 g245.2 mm 149.4 mm 7.5 mm 460 g243.4 mm 162.2 mm 7.7 mm 475 g242 mm 168 mm 8.1 mm 480 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mali-G72 MP3, MT8183, 32 GB eMMC Flash
321 (302min - 327max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 32 GB eMMC Flash
298 (239min - 314max) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
Lenovo Tab M10
Adreno 506, SD 450, 16 GB eMMC Flash
207 (98min - 220max) MBit/s ∼64% -36%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.7 MBit/s ∼16% -84%
Alcatel 1T 10
Mali-400 MP, MT8321, 16 GB eMMC Flash
40.3 MBit/s ∼13% -87%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mali-G72 MP3, MT8183, 32 GB eMMC Flash
299 (279min - 310max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 32 GB eMMC Flash
290 (274min - 309max) MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Tab M10
Adreno 506, SD 450, 16 GB eMMC Flash
284 (246min - 313max) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s ∼18% -82%
Alcatel 1T 10
Mali-400 MP, MT8321, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.8 MBit/s ∼15% -85%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø317 (302-327)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø299 (279-310)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
28 ∆E
65.7 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Amazon Fire HD 10 2019: 47.16 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 93.71 ∆E
ColorChecker
13 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
2 ∆E
6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
2 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Amazon Fire HD 10 2019: 9.19 ∆E min: 1.95 - max: 16.7 ∆E
430
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 449 cd/m² Átlag: 425.4 cd/m² Minimum: 5.09 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 89 %
Centrumban: 449 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 748:1 (Fekete: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.09
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Alcatel 1T 10
IPS, 1280x800, 10.1
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Lenovo Tab M10
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.1
Screen
-40%
-3%
-34%
-38%
1%
Brightness middle
449
277
-38%
426
-5%
514
14%
339
-24%
401
-11%
Brightness
425
263
-38%
399
-6%
492
16%
327
-23%
396
-7%
Brightness Distribution
89
87
-2%
91
2%
80
-10%
86
-3%
86
-3%
Black Level *
0.6
0.49
18%
0.38
37%
0.96
-60%
0.42
30%
0.5
17%
Contrast
748
565
-24%
1121
50%
535
-28%
807
8%
802
7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.1
5.8
-87%
4.5
-45%
5.42
-75%
5.8
-87%
2.9
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.4
13.1
-105%
7.9
-23%
9.84
-54%
11.6
-81%
5.8
9%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.8
5.4
-42%
5.2
-37%
6.5
-71%
8.6
-126%
4.1
-8%
Gamma
2.09 105%
2.13 103%
2.23 99%
2.216 99%
2.16 102%
2.36 93%
CCT
7202 90%
7260 90%
6875 95%
6780 96%
8718 75%
7263 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17621 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.8 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score
Average of class Tablet (840 - 43802, n=44)
5664 Points ∼13% +22%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
4635 Points ∼11%
Average Mediatek MT8183
4635 Points ∼11% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
3213 Points ∼7% -31%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3148 Points ∼7% -32%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points ∼4% -66%
Alcatel 1T 10
862 Points ∼2% -81%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
5445 Points ∼9%
Average Mediatek MT8183
5445 Points ∼9% 0%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=61)
4628 Points ∼8% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
4017 Points ∼7% -26%
Lenovo Tab M10
3897 Points ∼7% -28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3805 Points ∼7% -30%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points ∼6% -39%
Alcatel 1T 10
1106 Points ∼2% -80%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=61)
1624 Points ∼24% +16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1397 Points ∼21%
Average Mediatek MT8183
1397 Points ∼21% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1268 Points ∼19% -9%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points ∼18% -14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
940 Points ∼14% -33%
Lenovo Tab M10
774 Points ∼12% -45%
Alcatel 1T 10
429 Points ∼6% -69%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5452 Points ∼36% +8%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (5056 - 5186, n=2)
5121 Points ∼33% +1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
5056 Points ∼33%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 12466, n=58)
4786 Points ∼31% -5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
4719 Points ∼31% -7%
Lenovo Tab M10
4238 Points ∼28% -16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points ∼24% -27%
Work performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
6456 Points ∼32% +3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
6284 Points ∼31%
Average Mediatek MT8183
6284 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 13629, n=94)
5212 Points ∼26% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points ∼24% -22%
Lenovo Tab M10
4836 Points ∼24% -23%
Alcatel 1T 10
2529 Points ∼13% -60%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2567 Points ∼63%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (2344 - 2567, n=2)
2456 Points ∼60% -4%
Average of class Tablet (1152 - 3658, n=18)
2308 Points ∼57% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
2053 Points ∼51% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (402 - 8745, n=18)
1846 Points ∼21% +93%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
955 Points ∼11%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (936 - 955, n=2)
946 Points ∼11% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
612 Points ∼7% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (469 - 6226, n=18)
1739 Points ∼26% +57%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1110 Points ∼16%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (1080 - 1110, n=2)
1095 Points ∼16% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
725 Points ∼11% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2966 Points ∼37%
Average Mediatek MT8183
2966 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Tablet (650 - 4756, n=58)
1900 Points ∼24% -36%
Lenovo Tab M10
1785 Points ∼22% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1755 Points ∼22% -41%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1632 Points ∼20% -45%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1386 Points ∼17% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (99 - 9453, n=58)
1842 Points ∼19% +87%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
986 Points ∼10%
Average Mediatek MT8183
986 Points ∼10% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
547 Points ∼6% -45%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
528 Points ∼6% -46%
Lenovo Tab M10
413 Points ∼4% -58%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
399 Points ∼4% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (129 - 7369, n=58)
1651 Points ∼20% +43%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1158 Points ∼14%
Average Mediatek MT8183
1158 Points ∼14% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
646 Points ∼8% -44%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
612 Points ∼7% -47%
Lenovo Tab M10
498 Points ∼6% -57%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
480 Points ∼6% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2963 Points ∼51%
Average Mediatek MT8183
2963 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4702, n=65)
1791 Points ∼31% -40%
Lenovo Tab M10
1782 Points ∼31% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1716 Points ∼30% -42%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1648 Points ∼29% -44%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1399 Points ∼24% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=65)
3061 Points ∼11% +110%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1455 Points ∼5%
Average Mediatek MT8183
1455 Points ∼5% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
822 Points ∼3% -44%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
754 Points ∼3% -48%
Lenovo Tab M10
712 Points ∼2% -51%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
602 Points ∼2% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=65)
2151 Points ∼16% +31%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1641 Points ∼12%
Average Mediatek MT8183
1641 Points ∼12% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
930 Points ∼7% -43%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
840 Points ∼6% -49%
Lenovo Tab M10
822 Points ∼6% -50%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
701 Points ∼5% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2832 Points ∼54%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (2527 - 2832, n=2)
2680 Points ∼51% -5%
Lenovo Tab M10
1818 Points ∼35% -36%
Average of class Tablet (729 - 4096, n=74)
1789 Points ∼34% -37%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1744 Points ∼33% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1704 Points ∼33% -40%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points ∼26% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet (55 - 8548, n=74)
1476 Points ∼17% +49%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
990 Points ∼12%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (982 - 990, n=2)
986 Points ∼12% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
542 Points ∼6% -45%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points ∼5% -58%
Lenovo Tab M10
363 Points ∼4% -63%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
193 Points ∼2% -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Tablet (70 - 6850, n=76)
1382 Points ∼7% +19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1157 Points ∼6%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (1136 - 1157, n=2)
1147 Points ∼6% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
639 Points ∼3% -45%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points ∼2% -58%
Lenovo Tab M10
442 Points ∼2% -62%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
241 Points ∼1% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2818 Points ∼53%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (2587 - 2818, n=2)
2703 Points ∼51% -4%
Lenovo Tab M10
1816 Points ∼34% -36%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1758 Points ∼33% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1702 Points ∼32% -40%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 4104, n=77)
1668 Points ∼32% -41%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points ∼26% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (42 - 12725, n=77)
2057 Points ∼16% +43%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1434 Points ∼11%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (1430 - 1434, n=2)
1432 Points ∼11% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
708 Points ∼6% -51%
Lenovo Tab M10
694 Points ∼5% -52%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points ∼5% -58%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
99 Points ∼1% -93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average of class Tablet (53 - 8675, n=78)
1697 Points ∼18% +5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1610 Points ∼17%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (1588 - 1610, n=2)
1599 Points ∼17% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
814 Points ∼9% -49%
Lenovo Tab M10
804 Points ∼8% -50%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points ∼7% -58%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
125 Points ∼1% -92%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Average Mediatek MT8183 (18829 - 19883, n=2)
19356 Points ∼22% +3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
18829 Points ∼22%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points ∼17% -20%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51436, n=173)
14298 Points ∼17% -24%
Lenovo Tab M10
14076 Points ∼16% -25%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
13310 Points ∼15% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
12994 Points ∼15% -31%
Alcatel 1T 10
7924 Points ∼9% -58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 221941, n=173)
24384 Points ∼4% +24%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
19615 Points ∼4%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (19490 - 19615, n=2)
19553 Points ∼4% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13794 Points ∼3% -30%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points ∼2% -35%
Lenovo Tab M10
12386 Points ∼2% -37%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
11419 Points ∼2% -42%
Alcatel 1T 10
2468 Points ∼0% -87%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Average Mediatek MT8183 (19435 - 19576, n=2)
19506 Points ∼8% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
19435 Points ∼8%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 110846, n=174)
18399 Points ∼7% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13608 Points ∼6% -30%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points ∼5% -32%
Lenovo Tab M10
12726 Points ∼5% -35%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
11791 Points ∼5% -39%
Alcatel 1T 10
2913 Points ∼1% -85%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
38 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (38 - 38, n=2)
38 fps ∼0% 0%
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=193)
35.2 fps ∼0% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
25 fps ∼0% -34%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps ∼0% -42%
Lenovo Tab M10
22 fps ∼0% -42%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
20 fps ∼0% -47%
Alcatel 1T 10
7.8 fps ∼0% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
37 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (37 - 37, n=2)
37 fps ∼1% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
24 fps ∼1% -35%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=197)
23.2 fps ∼1% -37%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps ∼1% -43%
Lenovo Tab M10
20 fps ∼1% -46%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
19 fps ∼1% -49%
Alcatel 1T 10
4.4 fps ∼0% -88%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=127)
23.8 fps ∼4% +19%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (20 - 21, n=2)
20.5 fps ∼3% +3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
20 fps ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13 fps ∼2% -35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps ∼2% -50%
Lenovo Tab M10
9.2 fps ∼1% -54%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
8.8 fps ∼1% -56%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
21 fps ∼6%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (20 - 21, n=2)
20.5 fps ∼6% -2%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=133)
16.8 fps ∼5% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13 fps ∼4% -38%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps ∼3% -55%
Lenovo Tab M10
8.8 fps ∼2% -58%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
8.6 fps ∼2% -59%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=79)
21.2 fps ∼0% +77%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
12 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (12 - 12, n=2)
12 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
8.1 fps ∼0% -32%
Lenovo Tab M10
6 fps ∼0% -50%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
5.4 fps ∼0% -55%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps ∼0% -59%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=79)
14.3 fps ∼0% +19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
12 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (12 - 12, n=2)
12 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
7.7 fps ∼0% -36%
Lenovo Tab M10
5.7 fps ∼0% -52%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
5.3 fps ∼0% -56%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps ∼0% -61%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=29)
9.69 fps ∼6% +125%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
4.3 fps ∼3%
Average Mediatek MT8183
4.3 fps ∼3% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
3 fps ∼2% -30%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1.7 fps ∼1% -60%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.8 - 51.1, n=29)
9.38 fps ∼4% +261%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2.6 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek MT8183
2.6 fps ∼1% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1.8 fps ∼1% -31%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1.1 fps ∼0% -58%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=29)
14.6 fps ∼7% +97%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.4 fps ∼4%
Average Mediatek MT8183
7.4 fps ∼4% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
4.9 fps ∼2% -34%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
2.7 fps ∼1% -64%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 134, n=29)
25.1 fps ∼4% +230%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.6 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek MT8183
7.6 fps ∼1% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5 fps ∼1% -34%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
2.8 fps ∼0% -63%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=55)
15.2 fps ∼3% +105%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.4 fps ∼2%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (7.4 - 7.4, n=2)
7.4 fps ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5.2 fps ∼1% -30%
Lenovo Tab M10
3.4 fps ∼1% -54%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3.2 fps ∼1% -57%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼0% -73%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=55)
9.59 fps ∼4% +30%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.4 fps ∼3%
Average Mediatek MT8183 (7.4 - 7.4, n=2)
7.4 fps ∼3% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5 fps ∼2% -32%
Lenovo Tab M10
3.3 fps ∼1% -55%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3 fps ∼1% -59%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼1% -73%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (8.72 - 21.8, n=4)
13.6 fps ∼15% +27%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
10.72 fps ∼11%
Average Mediatek MT8183
10.7 fps ∼11% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
8.72 (4.95min - 24.96max) fps ∼9% -19%
Vulkan Medium Native
Average of class Tablet (7.67 - 14.8, n=2)
11.2 fps ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
fps ∼0%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (12 - 22.7, n=2)
17.4 fps ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
0 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
fps ∼0%
VRMark - Amber Room
Average of class Tablet (669 - 3130, n=5)
1455 Score ∼19% +11%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1306 Score ∼17%
Average Mediatek MT8183
1306 Score ∼17% 0%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1016 Points ∼50% +9%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points ∼50% +9%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
929 Points ∼46%
Average Mediatek MT8183
929 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=122)
767 Points ∼38% -17%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
742 Points ∼36% -20%
Lenovo Tab M10
735 Points ∼36% -21%
Alcatel 1T 10
10 Points ∼0% -99%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=123)
2362 Points ∼8% +52%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1550 Points ∼5%
Average Mediatek MT8183
1550 Points ∼5% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1073 Points ∼4% -31%
Lenovo Tab M10
949 Points ∼3% -39%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
836 Points ∼3% -46%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points ∼3% -46%
Alcatel 1T 10
142 Points ∼0% -91%
Memory
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2380 Points ∼27%
Average Mediatek MT8183
2380 Points ∼27% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
2079 Points ∼23% -13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1948 Points ∼22% -18%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points ∼17% -36%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 6751, n=123)
1262 Points ∼14% -47%
Lenovo Tab M10
846 Points ∼10% -64%
Alcatel 1T 10
397 Points ∼4% -83%
System
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
3827 Points ∼23%
Average Mediatek MT8183
3827 Points ∼23% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
3517 Points ∼21% -8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3080 Points ∼19% -20%
Lenovo Tab M10
2845 Points ∼17% -26%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=123)
2661 Points ∼16% -30%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points ∼14% -39%
Alcatel 1T 10
945 Points ∼6% -75%
Overall
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1903 Points ∼23%
Average Mediatek MT8183
1903 Points ∼23% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1681 Points ∼20% -12%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=122)
1392 Points ∼16% -27%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1389 Points ∼16% -27%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points ∼16% -31%
Lenovo Tab M10
1138 Points ∼13% -40%
Alcatel 1T 10
150 Points ∼2% -92%

Legend

 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Alcatel 1T 10 Mediatek MT8321, ARM Mali-400 MP, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 Samsung Exynos 7904, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (14 - 126, n=17)
57.4 Points ∼100% +124%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
25.621 Points ∼45%
Average Mediatek MT8183
25.6 Points ∼45% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samung Browser 9.2)
22.14 Points ∼39% -14%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=105)
58.7 Points ∼100% +28%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
46.39 Points ∼79% +1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
45.743 Points ∼78%
Average Mediatek MT8183
45.7 Points ∼78% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
43.131 Points ∼73% -6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
29.598 Points ∼50% -35%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
22.219 Points ∼38% -51%
Alcatel 1T 10 (Chrome 69)
10.907 Points ∼19% -76%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Tablet (13 - 182, n=40)
72.6 Points ∼100% +40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
56 Points ∼77% +8%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
52 Points ∼72%
Average Mediatek MT8183
52 Points ∼72% 0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
42 Points ∼58% -19%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
34 Points ∼47% -35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 135, n=26)
51.2 runs/min ∼100% +85%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
27.7 runs/min ∼54%
Average Mediatek MT8183
27.7 runs/min ∼54% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
21.58 runs/min ∼42% -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
8696 Points ∼100% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
8665 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek MT8183
8665 Points ∼100% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=190)
7552 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
5412 Points ∼62% -38%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
3990 Points ∼46% -54%
Alcatel 1T 10 (Chrome 69)
1718 Points ∼20% -80%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Alcatel 1T 10 (Chrome 69)
19084.6 ms * ∼100% -283%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
11447.7 ms * ∼60% -130%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
9248.9 ms * ∼48% -86%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=202)
8881 ms * ∼47% -78%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
4979.3 ms * ∼26%
Average Mediatek MT8183
4979 ms * ∼26% -0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
4054.8 ms * ∼21% +19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3975.5 ms * ∼21% +20%

* ... smaller is better

Amazon Fire HD 10 2019Alcatel 1T 10Amazon Fire HD 10 2017Huawei MediaPad M5 liteLenovo Tab M10Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-55%
-35%
40%
-20%
-12%
-21%
-42%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
51.96 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
31.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-38%
30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-42%
72.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
40%
61.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18%
65.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
26%
52.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=167)
0%
49.7 (14 - 73.8, n=70)
-4%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
77.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
39.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-48%
55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-28%
83.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
83.48 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
81.16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
71.1 (8.2 - 96.5, n=167)
-8%
67.7 (17.6 - 87.7, n=70)
-12%
Random Write 4KB
23.28
10.1
-57%
9.37
-60%
77.25
232%
11.32
-51%
11.37
-51%
19.2 (0.75 - 89.5, n=210)
-18%
10.6 (0.13 - 262, n=222)
-54%
Random Read 4KB
74.99
12.72
-83%
27.72
-63%
73.47
-2%
52.5
-30%
62.56
-17%
41.1 (3.59 - 117, n=210)
-45%
25 (1.04 - 230, n=222)
-67%
Sequential Write 256KB
180.1
83.7
-54%
147.67
-18%
82.56
-54%
52.6
-71%
90.71
-50%
96.7 (14.8 - 189, n=210)
-46%
53.7 (2.04 - 732, n=222)
-70%
Sequential Read 256KB
266.16
137.22
-48%
262.2
-1%
308.15
16%
279.94
5%
300.03
13%
239 (25.8 - 452, n=210)
-10%
143 (6.75 - 1789, n=222)
-46%
0102030405060Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.15.0: Ø25.1 (1-27)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 1.8.1a: Ø16.3 (1-23)
; Shadow Fight 3; 1.19.4: Ø59.1 (24-60)
Max. terhelés
 27.9 °C26.2 °C28.4 °C 
 30 °C26.1 °C29.5 °C 
 30 °C25.4 °C29.8 °C 
Maximum: 30 °C
Átlag: 28.1 °C
27.1 °C24.5 °C24.6 °C
29 °C25.2 °C25 °C
28.2 °C25.2 °C25.8 °C
Maximum: 29 °C
Átlag: 26.1 °C
Tápegység (max.)  28.2 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 20.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 34.6 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.933.22529.225.23121.5214024.225.45034.331.66324.429.9802522.410024.326.312523.532.216023.839.820020.942.525019.44831518.254.840016.758.250015.862.663014.667.280014.470.310001472.3125014.573.3160014.274.5200014.373.9250013.573.9315014.874.640001576.8500014.480.5630014.972.7800014.569.1100001565.81250014.8551600015.153.5SPL27.186.3N0.963.7median 14.9median 67.2Delta2.511.338.924.330.93226.32827.326.433.130.926.322.224.224.924.43618.14422.552.518.55117.557.714.766.115.266.314.670.11574.213.473.814.370.713.868.813.568.613.772.113.575.114.276.613.971.914.676.414.976.114.978.714.775.214.765.4155326.686.20.869.5median 14.7median 70.11.88.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAmazon Fire HD 10 2019Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.02 / 0.28 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 1.14 / 3.71 / 3.74 Watt
Terhelés midlight 5.26 / 7.68 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
6300 mAh
Alcatel 1T 10
4000 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
7500 mAh
Lenovo Tab M10
4850 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
6150 mAh
Power Consumption
2%
-25%
-26%
-6%
-28%
Idle Minimum *
1.14
1.01
11%
1.55
-36%
2.8
-146%
0.98
14%
1.66
-46%
Idle Average *
3.71
3.69
1%
4.17
-12%
3.3
11%
4.45
-20%
4.28
-15%
Idle Maximum *
3.74
3.81
-2%
4.25
-14%
3.9
-4%
4.51
-21%
4.44
-19%
Load Average *
5.26
6.17
-17%
7.13
-36%
5.2
1%
5.78
-10%
7.53
-43%
Load Maximum *
7.68
6.19
19%
9.63
-25%
7.2
6%
7.18
7%
9.09
-18%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
28h 11min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
24h 40min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
3h 48min
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
6300 mAh
Alcatel 1T 10
4000 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
7500 mAh
Lenovo Tab M10
4850 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
6150 mAh
Battery Runtime
-43%
-32%
3%
-30%
-7%
Reader / Idle
1691
960
-43%
2162
28%
1290
-24%
1500
-11%
H.264
1480
585
-60%
934
-37%
596
-60%
838
-43%
WiFi v1.3
950
545
-43%
542
-43%
852
-10%
580
-39%
723
-24%
Load
228
274
20%
299
31%
240
5%
347
52%

Pro

+ erős nyolcmagos SoC
+ Alexa integráció
+ világos 1080p kijelző
+ USB-C csatlakoztatás
+ bővíthető tárhely
+ a Google Play Store utólag telepíthető
+ hosszú üzemidő
+ kedvező ár

Kontra

- olcsó műanyag kivitelezés
- a Fire OS túlságosan Amazon-centrikus marad
- az Amazon App Store még mindig gyér a Google Play-hez képest
- nincs GPS
- rossz kamerák

Összegzés - Egy csábító belépőszintű tablet

Amazon Fire HD 10 (2019) Tablet rövid értékelés. Test device courtesy of Amazon Germany.
Amazon Fire HD 10 (2019) Tablet rövid értékelés. Test device courtesy of Amazon Germany.

Az Amazon Fire HD 10 (2019) egyike a legolcsóbb 10 hüvelykes tableteknek a piacon. A 150 dolláros tablet jó ár-érték arányt nyújt, viszont a képernyőzár közben megjelenő reklámok néhány embert arra kényszeríthetnek, hogy további 15 dollárért nyúljanak a zsebükbe, hogy megszabduljanak az Amazon „akciós” ajánlataitól.

Az értékelés elején feltettük a kérdést, hogy kinek a legmegfelelőbb a Fire HD 10 (2019). Több szempontból is letesztelve a tabletet, azt mondhatjuk, hogy a Fire HD 10 (2019) azoknak való leginkább, akik egy nagy képernyős készüléket szeretnének, amelyen böngészhetnek és videókat nézhetnek. A nyolcmagos SoC erőteljes, viszont nem képes minden modern játékot simán futtatni. Ezért a Fire HD 10 (2019) valószínűleg zavarná a mobil gamereket. A Google funkcionalitás alapból hiányzik, és ez valószínűleg nem fog tetszeni azoknak sem, akik a legújabb játékokat szeretnék letölteni. Habár utólag is telepíthető a Google Play Store, az Amazon kijelenti, hogy ilyen esetben a készülék garanciája semmissé válik.

Az Amazon Fire HD 10 (2019) egy megfelelő, kedvező árú tablet, viszonylag jó teljesítménnyel és üzemidővel. Figyeljünk viszont az Amazon ökoszisztémájára, mivel a Google Play Store telepítésével érvényteleníthetjük a garanciát.

The Fire HD 10 (2019) nagyszerű üzemidővel is rendelkezik. A tablet kamerái viszont szánalmasak, ócska felépítéssel és GPS nélkül, és mindezt érdemes figyelembe venni a megvétel előtt. A Fire OS UI-t úgyszintén meg kell szokni, mivel nem hasonlít az alap Android-ra vagy a legtöbb Android skin-re. Mindent egybevetve, a Fire HD 10 (2019) ideális azoknak, akik már elkötelezték magukat az Amazon ökoszisztémája mellett. A mélyebb Alexa integráció és a Show Mode jó húzások, és segítik megkülönböztetni a Fire HD 10 (2019)-et a társaitól.

Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 - 12/02/2019 v7
Manuel Masiero

Váz
64 / 98 → 66%
Billentyűzet
71 / 80 → 89%
Érintőpad
83%
Csatlakoztathatóság
36 / 70 → 51%
Súly
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Akkumulátor
92%
Kijelző
84%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
13 / 78 → 16%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
52 / 92 → 57%
Hőmérséklet
95%
Zaj
100%
Audio
72 / 91 → 79%
Camera
30 / 85 → 35%
Átlag
67%
79%
Tablet - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Amazon Fire HD 10 (2019) Tablet rövid értékelés: Egy 10 hüvelykes tablet kedvező áron
Manuel Masiero, 2020-01- 5 (Update: 2020-01- 5)
Alex Alderson
Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - News Editor - @aldersonaj