Notebookcheck

Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Tablet rövid értékelés - Így kell kinéznie egy frissítésnek

Laptop, menj haza? A jelenlegi iPad Pro 11 2020 megkísérel erősíteni a pozícióján mint laptop helyettesítő egy érintőpaddal és nagyobb teljesítménnyel. Emellett javultak a kamerák, és a kijelző most 120 Hz-re képes. Ebben az értékelésben közelebbről megvizsgáljuk az Apple exkluzív igáslovát.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (fordította Zoltán Kiss),
Apple ARM iPad Pro Tablet
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (iPad Pro Széria)
Processzor
Apple A12Z Bionic 8 x - 2.5 GHz, Vortex, Tempest
Grafikus adapter
Apple A12Z Bionic GPU
Memória
6144 MB 
Kijelző
11 hüvelyk 2.86:2, 2388 x 1668 pixel 265 PPI, kapacitív érintőképernyő, Liquid Retina Display, IPS, ProMotion technológia, kijelző széles színskála-lefedettséggel (P3), True Tone kijelző, szennyeződésálló bevonat, teljesen laminált kijelző, tükröződésmentes bevonat,, fényes: igen, 120 Hz
Háttértár
128 GB NVMe, 128 GB 
, 115 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 3.0, 1 DisplayPort, Audió csatlakozók: audió kimenet USB-C-n keresztül, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: Gyorsulásmérő, girométer, barométer, iránytű, Dokkoló port (Smart Connector)
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 5.9 x 247.6 x 178.5
Akkumulátor
28.65 Wh, 7538 mAh Lítium-Polimer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operációs rendszer
Apple iPadOS 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix flash, f/​1.8, AF, OIS, széles látószögű lencse (kamera 1), 10.0 megapixel, vaku, ultraszéles látószögű lencse, f/​2.4 (kamera 2)
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix f/​2.2, flash, IR, True Depth
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: négy hangszóró, Billentyűzet: virtuális / Smart Keyboard Folio Cover mint tartozék, töltő, USB-C kábel, 12 Hónap Garancia, fanless
Released
03/18/2020
Súly
471 g, Tápegység: 72 g
Ár
879 Euró
Hivatkozások
Apple honlap
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép 
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
90 %
06/2020
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU		471 g5.9 mm11"2388x1668
90 %
11/2018
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
A12X Bionic, A12X Bionic GPU		468 g5.9 mm11"2388x1668
88 %
03/2020
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)		790 g8.5 mm12.3"2736x1824
87 %
01/2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
SD 855, Adreno 640		420 g5.7 mm10.5"2560x1600
83 %
04/2018
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Kirin 960s, Mali-G71 MP8		498 g7.3 mm10.8"2560x1600
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020

Size Comparison

❌
292 mm 201 mm 8.5 mm 790 g258.7 mm 171.8 mm 7.3 mm 498 g248 mm 179 mm 5.9 mm 468 g247.6 mm 178.5 mm 5.9 mm 471 g244.5 mm 159.5 mm 5.7 mm 420 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
836 (min: 743, max: 888) MBit/s ∼100% +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
679 (min: 600, max: 714) MBit/s ∼81% +11%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
609 (min: 572, max: 622) MBit/s ∼73%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
A12X Bionic GPU, A12X Bionic, TSB3247M61710TWNA1 64GB NVMe
537 (min: 397, max: 559) MBit/s ∼64% -12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼26% -65%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
828 (min: 752, max: 864) MBit/s ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
634 (min: 561, max: 705) MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
577 (min: 534, max: 612) MBit/s ∼70% -30%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
A12X Bionic GPU, A12X Bionic, TSB3247M61710TWNA1 64GB NVMe
488 (min: 262, max: 543) MBit/s ∼59% -41%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s ∼29% -71%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø608 (572-622)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø828 (752-864)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Turn
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Turn
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Overview
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Overview
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Turn
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Turn
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Bridge
GPS Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Wi-Fi – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Picture main optics
Picture main optics
Picture wide-angle optics
Picture wide-angle optics
ColorChecker
25.6 ∆E
41 ∆E
33 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
48.7 ∆E
38 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
30.1 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
49 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
47 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
45.3 ∆E
46 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad Pro 11 2020: 34.52 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 48.98 ∆E
ColorChecker
4 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
2 ∆E
4 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad Pro 11 2020: 5.46 ∆E min: 2.04 - max: 11.73 ∆E
609
cd/m²		629
cd/m²		567
cd/m²
637
cd/m²		617
cd/m²		569
cd/m²
547
cd/m²		538
cd/m²		553
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
Liquid Retina Display
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 637 cd/m² Átlag: 585.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.7 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 84 %
Centrumban: 617 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1714:1 (Fekete: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.94 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.156
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
IPS, 2388x1668, 11		Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
IPS, 2388x1668, 11		Microsoft Surface Pro 7
IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5		Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8
Screen
-8%
-11%
-79%
-76%
Brightness middle
617
639
4%
435
-29%
446
-28%
382
-38%
Brightness
585
591
1%
422
-28%
445
-24%
378
-35%
Brightness Distribution
84
87
4%
90
7%
86
2%
92
10%
Black Level *
0.36
0.45
-25%
0.32
11%
0.24
33%
Contrast
1714
1420
-17%
1359
-21%
1592
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
0.94
0.92
2%
1.18
-26%
2.7
-187%
2.8
-198%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
1.87
2.59
-39%
2.27
-21%
5.4
-189%
6
-221%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.4
1.3
7%
1.12
20%
2.1
-50%
3.5
-150%
Gamma
2.156 102%
2.22 99%
2.3 96%
2.05 107%
2.33 94%
CCT
6733 97%
6656 98%
6502 100%
6468 100%
6903 94%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.49
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1316000 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 1316000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 1316000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18037 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.2 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2 | 3DMark | AnTuTu v8 | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Metal Score 5.1
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (9984 - 10011, n=2)
9998 Points ∼98% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
9984 Points ∼98%
Average of class Tablet (9361 - 10011, n=3)
9785 Points ∼96% -2%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
9361 Points ∼92% -6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (4707 - 4712, n=2)
4710 Points ∼38% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
4707 Points ∼38%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
4620 Points ∼37% -2%
Average of class Tablet (566 - 4712, n=9)
2634 Points ∼21% -44%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
1127 Points ∼78%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (1117 - 1127, n=2)
1122 Points ∼77% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
1120 Points ∼77% -1%
Average of class Tablet (168 - 1127, n=9)
689 Points ∼48% -39%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (40279 - 40299, n=2)
40289 Points ∼47% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
40279 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
34750 Points ∼40% -14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
14698 Points ∼17% -64%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51374, n=167)
14047 Points ∼16% -65%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
221941 Points ∼41%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (220422 - 221941, n=2)
221182 Points ∼41% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
107333 Points ∼20% -52%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
35210 Points ∼6% -84%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 221941, n=167)
23705 Points ∼4% -89%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
110846 Points ∼45%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (110582 - 110846, n=2)
110714 Points ∼45% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
73307 Points ∼30% -34%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26875 Points ∼11% -76%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 110846, n=168)
17883 Points ∼7% -84%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (712218 - 751846, n=2)
732032 Points ∼97% +3%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
712218 Points ∼95%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
678238 Points ∼90% -5%
Average of class Tablet (78450 - 751846, n=9)
352738 Points ∼47% -50%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (5657 - 5709, n=2)
5683 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
5657 Points ∼99%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
5216 Points ∼91% -8%
Average of class Tablet (301 - 5709, n=18)
2096 Points ∼37% -63%

Legend

 
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Apple A12Z Bionic, Apple A12Z Bionic GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 Apple A12X Bionic, Apple A12X Bionic GPU, TSB3247M61710TWNA1 64GB NVMe
 
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 960s, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Average Apple A12Z Bionic
 
Average of class Tablet
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (125 - 126, n=2)
125 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
124.503 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
66.971 Points ∼54% -46%
Average of class Tablet (16.1 - 126, n=14)
60.2 Points ∼48% -52%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13)
277.69 Points ∼100% +1%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
274.4 Points ∼99%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (272 - 274, n=2)
273 Points ∼98% -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0)
255.48 Points ∼92% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
118.05 Points ∼43% -57%
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=99)
58.9 Points ∼21% -79%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
36.127 Points ∼13% -87%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13)
172 Points ∼100% +22%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
141 Points ∼82%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (140 - 141, n=2)
141 Points ∼82% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
104 Points ∼60% -26%
Average of class Tablet (13 - 182, n=34)
75.2 Points ∼44% -47%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (IOS 12.1.1)
131.9 (min: 131, max: 133) runs/min ∼100% +6%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (125 - 135, n=2)
130 runs/min ∼99% +4%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chome 80)
125 runs/min ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
66.2 runs/min ∼50% -47%
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 135, n=22)
53.9 runs/min ∼41% -57%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13)
44425 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (42372 - 43057, n=2)
42715 Points ∼96% +1%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
42372 Points ∼95%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0)
35408 Points ∼80% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
24654 Points ∼55% -42%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=184)
7444 Points ∼17% -82%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
6802 Points ∼15% -84%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=196)
8935 ms * ∼100% -1282%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
5947 ms * ∼67% -820%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116)
2175.7 ms * ∼24% -237%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0)
983.7 ms * ∼11% -52%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
646.4 ms * ∼7%
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (646 - 646, n=2)
646 ms * ∼7% -0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13)
603 ms * ∼7% +7%

* ... smaller is better

Max. terhelés
 34.2 °C36.3 °C34.6 °C 
 34.3 °C37.9 °C36 °C 
 34.5 °C37.4 °C35.4 °C 
Maximum: 37.9 °C
Átlag: 35.6 °C
36.7 °C37.9 °C35.6 °C
37.7 °C40.1 °C36.9 °C
36.4 °C37.6 °C35.4 °C
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Átlag: 37.1 °C
Tápegység (max.)  39.9 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR 260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.7 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
Heat development front
Heat development front
Heat development back
Heat development back
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.340.42540.741.13131.138.64034.3435034.751.96328.946.48023.840.910026.249.41252253.716020.757.32002157.225018.657.131517.762.540017.268.35001970.56301771.580015.272100017.369.7125015.468.6160018.564.6200015.958.7250015.165.6315014.464.3400014.860.1500015.161.2630015.363.8800015.664.91000015.961.41250016.161.21600016.657SPL60.869.667.428.378.5N15.224.219.31.145.8median 16.6median 62.5Delta1.65.333.633.537.537.435.837.837.935.639.134.730.232.530.231.828.4412451.923.756.222.662.221.666.519.866.519.468.519.96918.368.819.466.518.5671866.218.468.118.167.118.367.417.964.417.965.317.66217.965.817.770.117.864.317.958.917.957.160.830.578.715.91.448.7median 18.3median 66.22.13.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPad Pro 11 2020Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 1.3 / 3.5 / 5.6 Watt
Terhelés midlight 12.5 / 19.2 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
7538 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
7736 mAh		Microsoft Surface Pro 7
 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
7040 mAh		Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Power Consumption
-6%
-186%
23%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
1.2
8%
4.4
-238%
1.96
-51%
2.01
-55%
Idle Average *
3.5
4.1
-17%
8.7
-149%
2.8
20%
5.4
-54%
Idle Maximum *
5.6
7.5
-34%
9.6
-71%
2.82
50%
5.44
3%
Load Average *
12.5
13.6
-9%
44
-252%
5.31
58%
8.55
32%
Load Maximum *
19.2
15.2
21%
61
-218%
11.91
38%
11.53
40%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
33h 21min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 36min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
3h 17min
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
7538 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 11 2018
7736 mAh		Microsoft Surface Pro 7
 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860
7040 mAh		Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Battery Runtime
4%
-50%
-2%
-22%
Reader / Idle
2001
2056
3%
690
-66%
1276
-36%
1344
-33%
H.264
936
982
5%
403
-57%
872
-7%
702
-25%
WiFi v1.3
902
920
2%
586
-35%
556
-38%
648
-28%
Load
197
208
6%
115
-42%
340
73%
196
-1%

Pro

+ színhű 120 Hz-es kijelző
+ tartozékok széles választéka
+ gyors Wi-Fi
+ gyors teljesítmény
+ jó kétkamerás rendszer
+ minőségi hangzás
+ hosszú üzemidő
+ olcsóbb az elődjénél...

Kontra

- ...de még így is túl drága
- a kijelző lassú válaszideje
- csak 12 hónap garancia
- a ház kissé túl hajlékony

Összegzés - Ésszerű Frissítések és Alacsonyabb Ár

Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 rövid értékelés
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 rövid értékelés

Az Apple elvégzett néhány fejlesztést a 2020-as iPad Pro 11 modellben, és még az árakon is csökkentett a konfigurációk többségénél. Bár ez úgy hangzik, mintha egy nagyszerű ajánlat lenne, de az Apple iPad Pro még így sem olcsó. Viszont több aspektusa is tükrözi a prémium árat: A kamerák tovább javultak, annak ellenére, hogy már eleve a referenciának számítottak a tabletek között. A legújabb csúcstelefonok kameráit nem érik el, de teljesen alkalmasak szép fotók készítésére.

A tartozékok széles választéka bővült a Magic Keyboard-dal, és az USB-C port megnyitja az Apple kapuit a harmadik fél hardverek felé. Az új kurzornak köszönhetően például egy normális USB egeret használhatunk a rendszer navigálására.

A készülék erős, gyors Wi-Fi-vel és háttértárral, és egy nagyon színhű kijelzővel, amely 120 Hz-es frissítési frekvenciájának köszönhetően rendkívül sima animáció megjelenítésre képes.

Ésszerű frissítések és nagyrészt mérsékelt árak: Az Apple iPad Pro 11 2020-ban is egy jó választás annak, aki megengedheti magának.

Mivel az Apple összességében nagyon értelmes frissítéseket vitt véghez, még az előző generációról való átváltás is érdemleges lehet. Az egyetlen igazi hátrány az, hogy a ház kissé túl hajlékony.

Note: Since many of our benchmarks are not yet compatible with iPad OS 13.4 and the Magic Keyboard will be released in May as an important accessory, we will update our review once the new information becomes available.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 - 04/11/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Váz
84 / 98 → 86%
Billentyűzet
77 / 80 → 96%
Érintőpad
99%
Csatlakoztathatóság
51 / 70 → 72%
Súly
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Akkumulátor
90%
Kijelző
91%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
61 / 78 → 78%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
82 / 92 → 89%
Hőmérséklet
89%
Zaj
100%
Audio
82 / 91 → 90%
Camera
67 / 85 → 79%
Átlag
81%
90%
Tablet - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Tablet rövid értékelés - Így kell kinéznie egy frissítésnek
Florian Schmitt, 2020-06-24 (Update: 2020-06-24)