Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Tablet rövid értékelés - Így kell kinéznie egy frissítésnek
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix f/2.2, flash, IR, True Depth
» A Top 10 multimédiás noteszgép - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 játékos noteszgép
» A Top 10 belépő szintű üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 üzleti noteszgép
» A Top 10 notebook munkaállomása
» A Top 10 okostelefon - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 táblagép
» A Top 10 Windows tabletje
» A Top 10 subnotebook - tesztek alapján
» A Top 10 300 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 120 euró alatti okostelefonja
» A Top 10 phabletje (>5.5-inch)
» A Top 10 noteszgép 500 EUR (~160.000 HUF) alatt
» A Top 10 "pehelysúlyú" gaming notebookja
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90 % | 06/2020 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU | 471 g | 5.9 mm | 11.00" | 2388x1668 | |
90 % | 11/2018 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 A12X Bionic, A12X Bionic GPU | 468 g | 5.9 mm | 11.00" | 2388x1668 | |
88 % | 03/2020 | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 790 g | 8.5 mm | 12.30" | 2736x1824 | |
87 % | 01/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 SD 855, Adreno 640 | 420 g | 5.7 mm | 10.50" | 2560x1600 | |
83 % | 04/2018 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Kirin 960s, Mali-G71 MP8 | 498 g | 7.3 mm | 10.80" | 2560x1600 |
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 |


|
Fényerő megoszlás: 84 %
Centrumban: 617 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1714:1 (Fekete: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.94 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.156
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 IPS, 2388x1668, 11.00 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 IPS, 2388x1668, 11.00 | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 IPS, 2736x1824, 12.30 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.50 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.80 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -8% | -11% | -79% | -76% | |
Brightness middle | 617 | 639 4% | 435 -29% | 446 -28% | 382 -38% |
Brightness | 585 | 591 1% | 422 -28% | 445 -24% | 378 -35% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 87 4% | 90 7% | 86 2% | 92 10% |
Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.45 -25% | 0.32 11% | 0.24 33% | |
Contrast | 1714 | 1420 -17% | 1359 -21% | 1592 -7% | |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 0.94 | 0.92 2% | 1.18 -26% | 2.7 -187% | 2.8 -198% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 1.87 | 2.59 -39% | 2.27 -21% | 5.4 -189% | 6 -221% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 1.4 | 1.3 7% | 1.12 20% | 2.1 -50% | 3.5 -150% |
Gamma | 2.156 102% | 2.22 99% | 2.3 96% | 2.05 107% | 2.33 94% |
CCT | 6733 97% | 6656 98% | 6502 100% | 6468 100% | 6903 94% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 3.49 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1316 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 1316 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 1316 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9714 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise | |
↘ 15 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25 ms rise | |
↘ 27 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms). |
Geekbench 5.3 | |
Metal Score 5.1 | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (9984 - 10011, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Average of class Tablet (9361 - 10011, n=3) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (4707 - 4712, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 | |
Average of class Tablet (455 - 4712, n=27) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (1117 - 1127, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 | |
Average of class Tablet (133 - 1593, n=27) |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (40279 - 40299, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51436, n=177) | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (220422 - 221941, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 221941, n=177) | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (110582 - 110846, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 110846, n=178) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (712218 - 751846, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 | |
Average of class Tablet (75328 - 751846, n=20) |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (5657 - 5709, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 | |
Average of class Tablet (246 - 5709, n=23) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (125 - 126, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average of class Tablet (14 - 167, n=22) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (272 - 274, n=2) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 376, n=112) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) |
WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (140 - 141, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average of class Tablet (13 - 195, n=47) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (IOS 12.1.1) | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (125 - 135, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chome 80) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 198, n=31) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13) | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (42372 - 43057, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 58568, n=197) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (464 - 43092, n=209) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Average Apple A12Z Bionic (646 - 646, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 (Safari 13) |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.5 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 30.5 °C / 87 F.
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét | ![]() ![]() |
Üresjárat | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Terhelés |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Kulcs:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 7736 mAh | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 7040 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | -186% | 23% | -7% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.3 | 1.2 8% | 4.4 -238% | 1.96 -51% | 2.01 -55% |
Idle Average * | 3.5 | 4.1 -17% | 8.7 -149% | 2.8 20% | 5.4 -54% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.6 | 7.5 -34% | 9.6 -71% | 2.82 50% | 5.44 3% |
Load Average * | 12.5 | 13.6 -9% | 44 -252% | 5.31 58% | 8.55 32% |
Load Maximum * | 19.2 | 15.2 21% | 61 -218% | 11.91 38% | 11.53 40% |
* ... smaller is better
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2018 7736 mAh | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 7040 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 4% | -50% | -2% | -22% | |
Reader / Idle | 2001 | 2056 3% | 690 -66% | 1276 -36% | 1344 -33% |
H.264 | 936 | 982 5% | 403 -57% | 872 -7% | 702 -25% |
WiFi v1.3 | 902 | 920 2% | 586 -35% | 556 -38% | 648 -28% |
Load | 197 | 208 6% | 115 -42% | 340 73% | 196 -1% |
Pro
Kontra
Összegzés - Ésszerű Frissítések és Alacsonyabb Ár
Az Apple elvégzett néhány fejlesztést a 2020-as iPad Pro 11 modellben, és még az árakon is csökkentett a konfigurációk többségénél. Bár ez úgy hangzik, mintha egy nagyszerű ajánlat lenne, de az Apple iPad Pro még így sem olcsó. Viszont több aspektusa is tükrözi a prémium árat: A kamerák tovább javultak, annak ellenére, hogy már eleve a referenciának számítottak a tabletek között. A legújabb csúcstelefonok kameráit nem érik el, de teljesen alkalmasak szép fotók készítésére.
A tartozékok széles választéka bővült a Magic Keyboard-dal, és az USB-C port megnyitja az Apple kapuit a harmadik fél hardverek felé. Az új kurzornak köszönhetően például egy normális USB egeret használhatunk a rendszer navigálására.
A készülék erős, gyors Wi-Fi-vel és háttértárral, és egy nagyon színhű kijelzővel, amely 120 Hz-es frissítési frekvenciájának köszönhetően rendkívül sima animáció megjelenítésre képes.
Ésszerű frissítések és nagyrészt mérsékelt árak: Az Apple iPad Pro 11 2020-ban is egy jó választás annak, aki megengedheti magának.
Mivel az Apple összességében nagyon értelmes frissítéseket vitt véghez, még az előző generációról való átváltás is érdemleges lehet. Az egyetlen igazi hátrány az, hogy a ház kissé túl hajlékony.
Note: Since many of our benchmarks are not yet compatible with iPad OS 13.4 and the Magic Keyboard will be released in May as an important accessory, we will update our review once the new information becomes available.
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 - 04/11/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt