Notebookcheck

Asus ROG Chimera G703GI (i9 8950HK, GTX 1080, Full HD) Laptop rövid értékelés

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 06/11/2018
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Adrenalinlöket. Az Asus új ROG Chimera G703GI-je egyike a piacon jelenleg elérhető leggyorsabb gamer laptopoknak. A Core i9-8950HK-nak, és a túlhúzható GeForce GTX 1080-nak köszönhetően még a legerőforrásigényesebb játékok is simán futnak rajta. A G-Sync és a 144 Hz-es monitor már csak hab a tortán.

Asus Chimera G703GI (G703 Széria)
Processzor
Intel Core i9-8950HK
Grafikus adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Mag: 1682 MHz, Memória: 2578 MHz, GDDR5X, ForceWare 388.92
Memória
65536 MB 
, 4x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, minden hely foglalt
Kijelző
17.3 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, Full HD, G-Sync, 144 Hz, fényes: nem
Alaplap
Intel HM370
Háttértár
2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID), 1431 GB 
, + Seagate FireCuda ST2000LX001, hibrid háttértár, 2 TB @5400 rpm; tárhelyöblök: 3x M.2 type 2280 + 1x 2.5 inches
Hangkártya
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Csatlakozók
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington zár, Audió csatlakozók: 1x fejhallgató jack, 1x mikrofon jack, Kártyaolvasó: SD,SDHC,SDXC,MMC
Hálózat
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 51 x 425 x 319
Akkumulátor
71 Wh Lítium-Ion, 8 cellás
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webkamera: HD
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: 2.0, Billentyűzet: chiclet, RGB, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, 2x 280 wattos hálózati adapter, matrica, kulcskarika, gyártói eszközök, McAfee Security próba, XSplit Gamecaster próba, 24 Hónap Garancia
Súly
4.72 kg, Tápegység: 1.67 kg
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus X9 DT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
202 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Asus Chimera G703GI
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198 MB/s ∼98%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
187 MB/s ∼93% -6%
Asus G703
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182 MB/s ∼90% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=203)
90.3 MB/s ∼45% -54%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼40% -60%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Chimera G703GI
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
246 MB/s ∼100%
Aorus X9 DT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
241 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Asus G703
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
240 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=201)
109 MB/s ∼44% -56%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼35% -65%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
689 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
686 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Asus G703
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
681 MBit/s ∼99% 0%
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
681 MBit/s ∼99%
Aorus X9 DT
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
639 MBit/s ∼93% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=175)
595 MBit/s ∼86% -13%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
690 MBit/s ∼100%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Aorus X9 DT
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
601 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
596 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=175)
533 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Asus G703
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
506 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
281
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
269
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 301 cd/m² Átlag: 274.9 cd/m² Minimum: 32 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 82 %
Centrumban: 285 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1295:1 (Fekete: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.18 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 1.73
ΔE Greyscale 2.93 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
93% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
Asus Chimera G703GI
B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 1920x1080
Asus G703
AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 1920x1080
Aorus X9 DT
AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160
Response Times
-90%
12%
-100%
-359%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
6.4 (3.4, 3)
17.6 (8.4, 9.2)
-175%
8 (4.4, 3.6)
-25%
18.4 (9.2, 9.2)
-188%
44 (22.8, 21.2)
-588%
Response Time Black / White *
10.8 (6, 4.8)
11.2 (6, 5.2)
-4%
5.6 (3.8, 1.8)
48%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
-11%
24.8 (11.6, 13.2)
-130%
PWM Frequency
26000 (19)
Screen
-15%
9%
15%
-1%
Brightness middle
285
274
-4%
240
-16%
280
-2%
332
16%
Brightness
275
268
-3%
248
-10%
262
-5%
313
14%
Brightness Distribution
82
80
-2%
83
1%
86
5%
88
7%
Black Level *
0.22
0.29
-32%
0.22
-0%
0.22
-0%
0.28
-27%
Contrast
1295
945
-27%
1091
-16%
1273
-2%
1186
-8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.18
3.99
-25%
2.14
33%
1.78
44%
3.86
-21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.99
7.33
-22%
5.04
16%
3.91
35%
5.88
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.73
1.79
-3%
1.54
11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.93
4.14
-41%
1.62
45%
0.74
75%
4.33
-48%
Gamma
2.45 90%
2.58 85%
2.28 96%
2.43 91%
2.41 91%
CCT
7165 91%
7352 88%
6846 95%
6494 100%
6595 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
60
0%
77
28%
60
0%
88
47%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
92
-1%
100
8%
92
-1%
100
8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-53% / -26%
11% / 9%
-43% / -4%
-180% / -61%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.4 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8773 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
latencies
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
206 Points ∼100%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
205 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Intel Core i7-8700
190 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
185 Points ∼90% -10%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
185 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 209, n=413)
151 Points ∼73% -27%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1388 Points ∼100% +6%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1378 Points ∼99% +5%
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1312 Points ∼95%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Intel Core i7-8700
1167 Points ∼84% -11%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
932 Points ∼67% -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1865, n=414)
744 Points ∼54% -43%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.34 Points ∼100%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.33 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Intel Core i7-8700
2.18 Points ∼93% -7%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.1 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.09 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=406)
1.679 Points ∼72% -28%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.14 Points ∼100%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.13 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.05 Points ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Intel Core i7-8700
12.9 Points ∼85% -15%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
10.33 Points ∼68% -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.2, n=507)
7.26 Points ∼48% -52%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.34 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
15.14 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
206 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1312 Points
Segítség
PCMark 10 - Score
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6607 Points ∼100%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6558 Points ∼99% -1%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6387 Points ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5976 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
5035 Points ∼76% -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6959, n=115)
4933 Points ∼75% -25%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6281 Points ∼100%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6055 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
6016 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5801 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=310)
4919 Points ∼78% -22%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
4849 Points ∼77% -23%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6093 Points ∼100%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
5944 Points ∼98% -2%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
5859 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5720 Points ∼94% -6%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
4865 Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=328)
4218 Points ∼69% -31%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
6093 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6281 pontok
Segítség
Asus Chimera G703GI
2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
Asus G703
2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
Aorus X9 DT
Transcend TS1TMTE850
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
AS SSD
-20%
-28%
-57%
-24%
Score Total
4843
3962
-18%
4066
-16%
2145
-56%
4173
-14%
Score Write
1855
1519
-18%
1553
-16%
916
-51%
1615
-13%
Score Read
1999
1633
-18%
1691
-15%
828
-59%
1716
-14%
4K Write
141.26
148.44
5%
97.68
-31%
98.92
-30%
139.47
-1%
4K Read
57.4
47.61
-17%
38.37
-33%
22.23
-61%
43.65
-24%
Seq Write
4110.47
2556.32
-38%
2196.29
-47%
1018.64
-75%
1771.22
-57%
Seq Read
4885.76
3177.06
-35%
3058.28
-37%
1517.93
-69%
2532.5
-48%
2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 8905 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4316 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 424.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 383.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 5325 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4049 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.33 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 130.2 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X9 DT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
22240 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus G703
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
22160 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Chimera G703GI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21849 Points ∼98%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21422 Points ∼96% -2%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21104 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=441)
10260 Points ∼46% -53%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Chimera G703GI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
29696 Points ∼100%
Asus G703
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
29109 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
28918 Points ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
28621 Points ∼96% -4%
Aorus X9 DT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
27966 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=515)
11872 Points ∼40% -60%
3DMark 11 Performance
23488 pontok
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
214443 pontok
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
38913 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18999 pontok
Segítség
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
77.9 fps ∼100% +2%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
77.4 fps ∼99% +1%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
76.8 fps ∼99% 0%
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
76.7 fps ∼98%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700
75.6 fps ∼97% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=217)
44.8 fps ∼58% -42%
alacsony közepes magas ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 14576.7fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 113103fps

Zajszint

Üresjárat
30 / 34 / 42 dB(A)
HDD
31 dB(A)
Terhelés
53 / 53 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
csendes
40 dB(A)
hallható
50 dB(A)
hangos
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Asus Chimera G703GI
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Asus G703
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
8700, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
0%
-1%
-8%
-2%
8%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
30
-3%
30
-3%
30
-3%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=222)
-1%
Idle Minimum *
30
35
-17%
32
-7%
36
-20%
34
-13%
31.6 (28 - 41.7, n=643)
-5%
Idle Average *
34
36
-6%
34
-0%
37
-9%
35
-3%
32.8 (28 - 46.6, n=643)
4%
Idle Maximum *
42
38
10%
37
12%
43
-2%
40
5%
34.7 (28 - 50.4, n=643)
17%
Load Average *
53
46
13%
43
19%
50
6%
45
15%
40.4 (30.3 - 58, n=644)
24%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
48
6%
57
-12%
57
-12%
52
-2%
Load Maximum *
53
54
-2%
62
-17%
61
-15%
60
-13%
47.7 (38.9 - 64, n=644)
10%

* ... smaller is better

Max. terhelés
 42 °C44 °C50 °C 
 41 °C42 °C40 °C 
 29 °C30 °C29 °C 
Maximum: 50 °C
Átlag: 38.6 °C
50 °C45 °C48 °C
49 °C42 °C47 °C
30 °C33 °C35 °C
Maximum: 50 °C
Átlag: 42.1 °C
Tápegység (max.)  53 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 41.6 °C / 107 F, ranging from 21.1 to 78 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-1.3 °C / -2.3 F).
Asus Chimera G703GI
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Asus G703
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
8700, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-2%
9%
8%
6%
5%
Maximum Upper Side *
50
55
-10%
47
6%
43
14%
41
18%
45.5 (28 - 68.8, n=608)
9%
Maximum Bottom *
50
54
-8%
53
-6%
55
-10%
48
4%
49.1 (25.9 - 78, n=606)
2%
Idle Upper Side *
32
29
9%
26
19%
27
16%
30
6%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=559)
4%
Idle Bottom *
33
32
3%
27
18%
29
12%
35
-6%
31.6 (21.1 - 50.3, n=557)
4%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.735.52531.229.73129.929.94027.229.25025316326.140.3802451.910023.557.812524.261.816022.866.220025.166.625022.569.431520.373.840019.274.850018.477.363017.878.280017.477.8100017.880.4125017.580.2160017.277.7200017.277250017.477.7315017.377.1400017.576.7500017.272.8630017.269.4800017.467.91000017.365.41250017.258.3160001752.4SPL29.888.8N1.382.3median 17.5median 73.8Delta1.76.143.442.537.237.3303835.538.427.136.327.338.327.247.328.253.225.154.322.464.223.370.42273.920.676.718.877.919.372.318.363.717.866.918.371.817.681.217.184.417.285.917.183.717.179.517.272.717.180.61779.417.177.117.170.717.26516.966.429.892.71.394.7median 17.6median 72.71.96.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Chimera G703GIMSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Chimera G703GI audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.4 / 0.6 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 29 / 37 / 46 Watt
Terhelés midlight 156 / 314 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Chimera G703GI
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Asus G703
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
8700, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
10%
-1%
5%
5%
35%
Idle Minimum *
29
26
10%
31
-7%
28
3%
32
-10%
20.2 (3.9 - 113, n=603)
30%
Idle Average *
37
30
19%
35
5%
37
-0%
38
-3%
25.8 (6.8 - 119, n=603)
30%
Idle Maximum *
46
37
20%
45
2%
40
13%
45
2%
30.9 (8.3 - 122, n=603)
33%
Load Average *
156
123
21%
130
17%
109
30%
96
38%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=594)
33%
Load Maximum *
314
341
-9%
374
-19%
353
-12%
331
-5%
166 (21.9 - 590, n=593)
47%
Witcher 3 ultra *
252
257
-2%
268
-6%
256
-2%
237
6%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
2h 49min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
2h 10min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
0h 51min
Asus Chimera G703GI
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 71 Wh
Asus G703
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 71 Wh
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 75 Wh
Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
8700, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 82 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
13%
29%
49%
14%
80%
Reader / Idle
169
200
18%
225
33%
252
49%
164
-3%
329 (39 - 1174, n=592)
95%
WiFi v1.3
130
151
16%
190
46%
142
9%
250 (78 - 622, n=268)
92%
Load
51
54
6%
63
24%
77
51%
70
37%
78.6 (18 - 202, n=560)
54%
H.264
143
174
148
244 (88 - 506, n=122)

Pro

+ túlhúzható
+ jó beviteli eszközök
+ kitűnő teljesítmény
+ RGB háttérvilágítás
+ praktikus eszközök
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ 144 Hz-es panel
+ remek audio
+ SSD RAID
+ G-Sync

Kontra

- zajos
- magas fogyasztás
- korlátozott karbantartási lehetőségek
- rövid üzemidő
- háttérfény szivárgás
- nehéz
ROG Chimera G703GI, test device courtesy of Asus Germany
ROG Chimera G703GI, test device courtesy of Asus Germany

Elődjéhez hasonlóan, az új Coffee Lake-es Asus ROG Chimera G703 is az egyik legjobb gamer csúcslaptop.

Ha a tömegét és vastagságát figyelmen kívül hagyjuk, a háznak egy csomó előnye van. A 17 colos erőgép vonzereje nem csak a rövid válaszidejű, kontrasztos, stabil betekintésű és G-Sync képes 144 Hz-es kijelzőben rejlik, hanem modern csatlakozókínálatában (Thunderbolt 3) és jó beviteli eszközeiben is.

Teljesítmény terén egyszerűen nincs mit kritizálnunk. A gép natív felbontásában, a hatmagos CPU és a GeForce GTX 1080 minden mai játékot simán képes futtatni. A laptop terhelés alatt nagyon zajos, de a riválisai, például az MSI GT75 8RG és az Aorus X9 DT még hangosabbak 3D-s feladatok végrehajtása közben.

Mindent egybevetve, a gép éppen elég pontot kapott a "Nagyon jó" értékelés eléréséhez. A Gamer Top 10-es listánkon a G703 ismét az élre tör.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

Asus Chimera G703GI - 06/07/2018 v6
Florian Glaser

Váz
82 / 98 → 83%
Billentyűzet
89%
Érintőpad
86%
Csatlakoztathatóság
71 / 81 → 87%
Súly
41 / 10-66 → 55%
Akkumulátor
64%
Kijelző
88%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
100%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
100%
Hőmérséklet
84 / 95 → 88%
Zaj
59 / 90 → 65%
Audio
88%
Átlag
79%
88%
Gaming - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Asus ROG Chimera G703GI
Asus ROG Chimera G703GI
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Asus ROG Chimera G703GI (i9 8950HK, GTX 1080, Full HD) Laptop rövid értékelés
Florian Glaser, 2018-06-11 (Update: 2018-06-11)