Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
ChineseAmazon Fire 7 (2017) Tablet rövid értékelés
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Amazon Fire 7 2017 | |
| Amazon Fire Tablet | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Amazon Fire 7 2017 | |
| Amazon Fire Tablet | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fényerő megoszlás: 88 %
Centrumban: 328 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 937:1 (Fekete: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.25
| Amazon Fire 7 2017 IPS, 1024x600, 7.00 | Amazon Fire Tablet IPS, 1024x600, 7.00 | Acer Iconia One 8 IPS, 1280x800, 8.00 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 IPS, 1280x800, 7.00 | Xiaomi MiPad 2 IPS, 2048x1536, 7.90 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 Super AMOLED, 2048x1526, 9.70 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -30% | 6% | -4% | 9% | 46% | |
| Brightness middle | 328 | 323 -2% | 367 12% | 358 9% | 425 30% | 452 38% |
| Brightness | 337 | 299 -11% | 338 0% | 344 2% | 402 19% | 468 39% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 83 -6% | 83 -6% | 92 5% | 91 3% | 82 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.38 -9% | 0.31 11% | 0.37 -6% | 0.4 -14% | |
| Contrast | 937 | 850 -9% | 1184 26% | 968 3% | 1063 13% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 9.3 -102% | 4.1 11% | 5.3 -15% | 4.98 -8% | 1.8 61% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.6 | 17.6 5% | 20.2 -9% | 6.61 64% | 4 78% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 7.8 -105% | 4.38 -15% | 4.7 -24% | 5.2 -37% | 1.2 68% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 1.99 111% | 2.33 94% | 2.44 90% | 2.65 83% | 2.11 104% |
| CCT | 7338 89% | 7736 84% | 6394 102% | 7222 90% | 7249 90% | 6500 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 82.32 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.06 |
* ... a kisebb jobb
Képernyő villogása / PWM (impulzusszélesség-moduláció)
| Képernyő villogása / PWM észlelve | 12500 Hz | ≤ 17 % fényerő beállítása |  |
The display backlight flickers at 12500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 12500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Megjelenítési válaszidők
| ↔ Válaszidő Fekete-fehér | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.4 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 16 ms emelkedés |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms ősz | ||
| A képernyő viszonylag lassú reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, és túl lassú lehet a játékosok számára. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő rosszabb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Válaszidő 50% szürke és 80% szürke között | ||
| 39.2 ms ... emelkedés és süllyedés ↘ kombinálva | ↗ 20.4 ms emelkedés |  |
| ↘ 18.8 ms ősz | ||
| A képernyő lassú reakciósebességet mutat tesztjeinkben, és nem lesz kielégítő a játékosok számára. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a mért válaszidő rosszabb, mint az összes vizsgált eszköz átlaga (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire 7 2017 | |
| Amazon Fire Tablet | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Acer Iconia One 8 | |
| Amazon Fire 7 2017 | |
| Amazon Fire Tablet | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Amazon Fire 7 2017 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Amazon Fire 7 2017 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Amazon Fire 7 2017 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Acer Iconia One 8 | |
| Amazon Fire Tablet | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire 7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire Tablet | |
| Amazon Fire 7 2017 | |
| Acer Iconia One 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Acer Iconia One 8 | |
| Amazon Fire Tablet | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
| Amazon Fire 7 2017 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Acer Iconia One 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
| Amazon Fire 7 2017 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
| Amazon Fire Tablet | |
| Amazon Fire 7 2017 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Amazon Fire 7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
| Amazon Fire Tablet | |
| Acer Iconia One 8 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
* ... a kisebb jobb
| Amazon Fire 7 2017 | Amazon Fire Tablet | Acer Iconia One 8 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | Xiaomi MiPad 2 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 22% | -12% | -14% | 60% | 120% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 113.7 | 147 29% | 126 11% | 65.9 -42% | 147.9 30% | 288.6 154% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 34.1 | 37 9% | 40 17% | 28.95 -15% | 56.4 65% | 87.6 157% |
| Random Read 4KB | 21.97 | 22 0% | 17 -23% | 21.95 0% | 24.42 11% | 45.82 109% |
| Random Write 4KB | 6.03 | 11 82% | 2.9 -52% | 9.55 58% | 13.96 132% | 13.13 118% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 45.54 | 49.4 8% | 21.41 -53% | 76.4 68% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 27.74 | 29.19 5% | 18.4 -34% | 58.6 111% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Amazon Fire 7 2017 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (95.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Összességében 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Ugyanazon osztályhoz képest
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Az összes tesztelt eszközzel összehasonlítva
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlét |   0.05 / 0.19 Watt |
| Üresjárat |  0.97 / 2.68 / 2.69 Watt |
| Terhelés |
4.26 / 4.64 Watt |
    
| |
| Amazon Fire 7 2017 2980 mAh | Amazon Fire Tablet 2980 mAh | Acer Iconia One 8 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 4000 mAh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -13% | -16% | -35% | -124% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.97 | 1.12 -15% | 0.8 18% | 1.91 -97% | 3.33 -243% |
| Idle Average * | 2.68 | 3.06 -14% | 3.1 -16% | 3.59 -34% | 5.01 -87% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.69 | 3.31 -23% | 3.3 -23% | 4.06 -51% | 5.19 -93% |
| Load Average * | 4.26 | 4.44 -4% | 5.1 -20% | 4.29 -1% | 8.32 -95% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.64 | 5.09 -10% | 6.5 -40% | 4.31 7% | 9.33 -101% |
* ... a kisebb jobb
| Amazon Fire 7 2017 2980 mAh | Amazon Fire Tablet 2980 mAh | Acer Iconia One 8 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 4000 mAh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akkumulátor üzemidő | -17% | 31% | 36% | -18% | |
| Reader / Idle | 941 | 1257 34% | 1353 44% | ||
| H.264 | 511 | 795 56% | 513 0% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 516 | 428 -17% | 742 44% | 619 20% | 421 -18% |
| Load | 209 | 185 -11% | 379 81% |
Pro
Kontra
49 dolláros, igen alacsony árát figyelembe véve a Fire 7 (2017) remek ajánlat. Némileg komolyabb frissítésben reménykedtünk, de a lassú lapkakészlet és belső tárhely, alacsony felbontású kijelző, valamint a csak 1 GB RAM maradtak. Annak ellenére, hogy az üzemidő és a színhűség jobb lett, a tablet összességében még mindig gyenge teljesítményt mutat.
A kérdés adott: mire jó a Fire 7 (2017)? A 170 ppi-s, alacsony felbontású kijelzőn hosszan olvasni nem kellemes. Nem elég erős játékok futtatásához, de még netezéshez sem. A filmnézés akkor lenne kellemesebb, ha az egyetlen, hátra felé néző hangszóró jobban szólna. Tehát, a fenti listán szereplő összes dologra lehet használni a Fire 7 (2017)-et, de komoly kompromisszumokra kényszerülünk.
A legújabb Amazon Fire 7 ismét csak a legszerényebb igényeket képes kielégíteni. Sajnos az Amazon nem hozta fel a mai szintre a tablet hardverét. Emiatt a Fire 7 (2017) mellett a legkomolyabb érv most is az ára lesz.
Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.
Amazon Fire 7 2017
-
07/10/2017 v6(old)
Marcus Herbrich
Pricecompare
