Notebookcheck

Acer Predator Triton 700 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1080 Max-Q, Full-HD) Laptop rövid értékelés

Florian Glaser (fordította Tamás Somogyi), 09/29/2017
Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Notebook Windows

Merész újdonság. Az Acer új, ultravékony 15 inches Predator Triton 700 gaming notebookja határozottan innovatív. A mechanikus billentyűzeten kívül a touchpad szokatlan elhelyezése és designja érdekesebbé teszi a gép külsejét. Képes az elegáns házba csomagolt, GTX 1080 Max-Q-val felszerelt Triton 700 versenyre kelni az Asus ROG Zephyrus-szal?

Acer Predator Triton 700 (Predator Széria)
Processzor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Grafikus adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Mag: 1290 MHz, Memória: 2500 MHz, GDDR5X, ForceWare 382.64
Memória
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, both slots occupied, max. 32 GB
Kijelző
15.6 hüvelyk 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, Full-HD, G-Sync, 120 Hz, fényes: nem
Alaplap
Intel HM175
Háttértár
2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0), 1024 GB 
, NVMe PCIe-SSDs M.2 Typ 2280
Hangkártya
Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington zár, Audió csatlakozók: 1 Kopfhörer, 1 Line-in
Hálózat
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10MBit), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 18.9 x 393 x 266
Akkumulátor
54 Wh, 4670 mAh Lítium-Polimer, 3 Zellen, 11.55V
Operációs rendszer
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webkamera: 1280x720
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: Stereo (Dolby Atmos), Billentyűzet: Chiclet, Billentyűzet háttérvilágítás: igen, 230-watts power adapter, Quick Start Guide, warranty booklet, various manufacturer tools, Killer Performance Suite, MS Office 365 trial, XSplit Gamecaster trial, 24 Hónap Garancia
Súly
2.39 kg, Tápegység: 926 g
Ár
3500 EUR

 

Size comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
683 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
682 MBit/s ∼100%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
669 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Aorus X5 v7
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
441 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
594 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
551 MBit/s ∼93%
Aorus X5 v7
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
496 MBit/s ∼84% -10%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
491 MBit/s ∼83% -11%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
413 MBit/s ∼70% -25%
267
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
279
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
273
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 294 cd/m² Átlag: 276.9 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 84 %
Centrumban: 291 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 1323:1 (Fekete: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.52 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.59 | - Ø
89% sRGB (Argyll) 58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.44
Acer Predator Triton 700
AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus GX501
AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), 1920x1080, 15.6
Eurocom Q5
ID: LGD04D4, Name: LG Philips LP156UD1-SPB1, 3840x2160, 15.6
Aorus X5 v7
AU Optronics B156ZAN02.3 , 3840x2160, 15.6
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
3840x2160, 15.6
Response Times
15%
16%
7%
29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44.8 (21.2, 23.6)
40.4 (23.2, 17.2)
10%
32.4 (16, 16.4)
28%
44 (21.2, 22.8)
2%
28 (15.6, 12.4)
37%
Response Time Black / White *
29.6 (15.6, 14)
24 (11.6, 12.4)
19%
28.8 (18.8, 10)
3%
26.4 (14, 12.4)
11%
23.6 (15.2, 8.4)
20%
PWM Frequency
1351 (39)
Screen
-1%
-25%
1%
-34%
Brightness
277
305
10%
279
1%
297
7%
263
-5%
Brightness Distribution
84
83
-1%
87
4%
92
10%
92
10%
Black Level *
0.22
0.25
-14%
0.65
-195%
0.3
-36%
0.44
-100%
Contrast
1323
1312
-1%
442
-67%
1023
-23%
623
-53%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.52
6.02
-9%
4.5
18%
4.72
14%
8
-45%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.59
6.32
4%
4.6
30%
4.79
27%
9.1
-38%
Gamma
2.44 98%
2.28 105%
2.39 100%
2.42 99%
2.24 107%
CCT
7816 83%
8194 79%
7393 88%
7690 85%
5020 129%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58
60
3%
59
2%
60
3%
45.7
-21%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89
92
3%
92.3
4%
92
3%
72.1
-19%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
7% / 2%
-5% / -17%
4% / 2%
-3% / -21%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7028 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.82 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.13 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
156 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
734 Points
Segítség
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
174 Points ∼100% +12%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
162 Points ∼93% +4%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼92% +3%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points ∼90%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points ∼87% -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
827 Points ∼100% +13%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼90% +1%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
738 Points ∼89% +1%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points ∼89% 0%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points ∼89%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.98 Points ∼100% +9%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼92%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼92% 0%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.77 Points ∼89% -3%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.73 Points ∼87% -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.18 Points ∼100% +13%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.18 Points ∼89% +1%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points ∼89% 0%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points ∼89% 0%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.13 Points ∼89%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
5289 Points ∼100% +79%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5268 Points ∼100% +78%
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
4891 Points ∼92% +66%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
2953 Points ∼56%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5160 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
5057 Points ∼98% -2%
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4718 Points ∼91% -9%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4141 Points ∼80% -20%
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
3829 Points ∼74% -26%
PCMark 10 - Score
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
5125 Points ∼100% +29%
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
5119 Points ∼100% +29%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
3972 Points ∼78%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5160 pontok
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
2953 pontok
Segítség
Acer Predator Triton 700
2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
Eurocom Q5
Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
Aorus X5 v7
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
CrystalDiskMark 5.2
-15%
10%
Write 4K
109.2
149
36%
202.6
86%
Read 4K
45.45
45
-1%
57.19
26%
Write Seq
2631
1049
-60%
2073
-21%
Read Seq
2664
954
-64%
2763
4%
Write 4K Q32T1
460.6
463
1%
498.7
8%
Read 4K Q32T1
563.7
547
-3%
574.9
2%
Write Seq Q32T1
2771
1848
-33%
2075
-25%
Read Seq Q32T1
3417
3445
1%
3381
-1%
2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
CDM 5 Read Seq Q32T1: 3417 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq Q32T1: 2771 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K Q32T1: 563.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K Q32T1: 460.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2664 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2631 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K: 45.45 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K: 109.2 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
18219 Points ∼100% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
18120 Points ∼99%
Aorus X5 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
16349 Points ∼90% -10%
Eurocom Q5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14557 Points ∼80% -20%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11261 Points ∼62% -38%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
23540 Points ∼100% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
23329 Points ∼99%
Aorus X5 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
22241 Points ∼94% -5%
Eurocom Q5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18684 Points ∼79% -20%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14450 Points ∼61% -38%
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
140229 pontok
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
28416 pontok
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14287 pontok
Segítség
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
alacsony közepes magas ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 117.362.9fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 171142fps
For Honor (2017) 154115fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 92.154.5fps
Prey (2017) 138134fps
Rocket League (2017) 228fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 14985.3fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 10381.8fps
F1 2017 (2017) 135101fps
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) 56.638.6fps

Zajszint

Üresjárat
33 / 34 / 40 dB(A)
Terhelés
41 / 48 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
csendes
40 dB(A)
hallható
50 dB(A)
hangos
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm távolságról)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Noise
5%
2%
-6%
4%
off / environment *
31
31
-0%
29
6%
30
3%
28.8
7%
Idle Minimum *
33
32
3%
31.5
5%
35
-6%
33.1
-0%
Idle Average *
34
33
3%
33.8
1%
36
-6%
33.1
3%
Idle Maximum *
40
34
15%
33.8
15%
40
-0%
34
15%
Load Average *
41
39
5%
41.7
-2%
43
-5%
37.2
9%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43
42
2%
41.7
3%
49
-14%
46.1
-7%
Load Maximum *
48
46
4%
54.2
-13%
55
-15%
47.1
2%

* ... smaller is better

Max. terhelés
 61 °C57 °C50 °C 
 53 °C52 °C44 °C 
 40 °C38 °C33 °C 
Maximum: 61 °C
Átlag: 47.6 °C
57 °C69 °C63 °C
50 °C68 °C58 °C
39 °C42 °C44 °C
Maximum: 69 °C
Átlag: 54.4 °C
Tápegység (max.)  43 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Heat
6%
8%
5%
5%
Maximum Upper Side *
61
57
7%
56.2
8%
64
-5%
Maximum Bottom *
69
54
22%
61.2
11%
56
19%
Idle Upper Side *
29
32
-10%
27.8
4%
29
-0%
28.4
2%
Idle Bottom *
32
31
3%
29.6
7%
30
6%
29.6
7%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.433.3252930.53127.227.64027.131.9502729.4632532.38024.83910025.241.212522.438.316022.845.720021.753.425021.357.231519.860.740019.56550019.470.163019.475.580019.377.1100019.376125019.374.6160019.472.9200019.469.3250019.568.7315019.763.5400019.764.6500019.465.8630019.364.9800019.563.41000019.858.61250019.954.21600019.648.4SPL31.683.2N1.654.2median 19.5Acer Predator Triton 700median 64.6Delta0.67.940.14333383134.631.433.727.529.127.529.826.129.725.828.82328.322.541.922.252.322.457.921.464.219.967.219.870.719.774.31975.1207119.268.319.168.61969.519.269.219.268.819.169.419.270.61972.319.173.91972.718.86818.659.131.4831.659.4median 19.2Asus Zephyrus GX501median 68.816.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Acer Predator Triton 700 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus Zephyrus GX501 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 2.6 / 3.6 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 28 / 33 / 41 Watt
Terhelés midlight 94 / 222 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Power Consumption
21%
42%
1%
35%
Idle Minimum *
28
18
36%
9
68%
26
7%
14.5
48%
Idle Average *
33
23
30%
13.5
59%
31
6%
17.3
48%
Idle Maximum *
41
31
24%
13.7
67%
36
12%
17.4
58%
Load Average *
94
79
16%
87.8
7%
93
1%
93
1%
Load Maximum *
222
196
12%
158.6
29%
240
-8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
160
148
7%
129
19%
176
-10%
128.8
19%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
2h 30min
WiFi böngészés v1.3
2h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
1h 46min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
1h 10min

Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 54 Wh
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 50 Wh
Eurocom Q5
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 60 Wh
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, 94 Wh
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, 65 Wh
Battery Runtime
1%
86%
30%
75%
Reader / Idle
150
188
25%
466
211%
208
39%
386
157%
H.264
106
132
25%
163
54%
WiFi v1.3
144
130
-10%
258
79%
151
5%
232
61%
Load
70
44
-37%
47
-33%
84
20%
75
7%

Pro

+ sturdy, slim and high quality case
+ handy software (OC, fan controls)
+ high-contrast IPS screen with 120 Hz
+ easy maintenance access
+ mechanical keyboard
+ superb performance
+ well-made design
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ 2x PCIe-SSDs
+ G-Sync

Kontra

- annoying start-up sound (can be muted in BIOS)
- some sharpedged case elements
- high temperatures during 3D workloads
- flawed touchpad solution
- very short battery runtime
- moderate display reaction times
- no card reader
- shallow sound
- very expensive

Error: More than one (2) Pro / Contra Item for this review found!

Acer Predator Triton 700 (PT715-51-77JM), Test device supplied by Acer Germany.
Acer Predator Triton 700 (PT715-51-77JM), Test device supplied by Acer Germany.

Az Acer Predator Triton 700 brutális összecsapását láthattuk a ROG Zephyrus-szal, és most győztest kellene hirdetnünk, ami nem könnyű. A Triton 700 ház, billentyűzet, port választék és karbantartás terén teljesít jobban, míg a Zephyrus jobb touchpadet, alacsonyabb hőmérsékletet és csendesebb működést tudhat magáénak.

A fentieket leszámítva a két versenyzőnek nagyjából ugyanazok az előnyei és hátrányai. A nagy telepet és a szokott touchpad elrendezést becserélték egy vékony házra. A Dolby Atmos címke ellenére gyenge hangminőség nem illik a csillagászati árhoz. A magas kontrasztú, lassú válaszidejű, stabil betekintésű, 120 Hz-es és G-Sync-es IPS kijelző tetszetős.

Összegezve, a Triton 700 és a ROG Zephyrus is túlárazottnak tűnik, és az Nvidia Max-Q kezelése nem kis szerepet játszik ebben. Aki vékony házat szeretne, de olcsón, annak máshol kell keresgélnie - számukra nincs itt semmi látnivaló. Azok számára, akiket a játékok érdekelnek, és amúgy is elsősorban egy helyben használják a gépüket, vastagabb notebookokat javasolnánk, a szokványos GTX 1070-nel vagy 1080-nal. Végül is, a Triton 700 nem fért fel a "Top 10 Gaming Notebook" listánkra, de a "Top 10 vékony és könnyű Gaming Notebook" között helyet kapott.

Ez az eredeti értékelés rövidített változata. A teljes, angol nyelvű cikk itt olvasható.

 

 

Acer Predator Triton 700 - 09/21/2017 v6
Florian Glaser

Váz
88 / 98 → 90%
Billentyűzet
83%
Érintőpad
58%
Csatlakoztathatóság
63 / 81 → 77%
Súly
61 / 66 → 90%
Akkumulátor
61%
Kijelző
85%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
97%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
96%
Hőmérséklet
67 / 95 → 71%
Zaj
70 / 90 → 78%
Audio
70%
Átlag
75%
84%
Gaming - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Acer Predator Triton 700 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1080 Max-Q, Full-HD) Laptop rövid értékelés
Florian Glaser, 2017-09-29 (Update: 2017-09-29)