Notebookcheck

Xiaomi Poco M3 Smartphone rövid értékelés: A 150 eurós okostelefon

Jó üzlet az alacsony költségvetésűeknek. 150 eurós okostelefon, lehetséges? A Xiaomi Poco M3 azt bizonyítja, hogy igen. Ezért az összegért egy 6,53 hüvelykes Android 10 telefont kapunk IPS kijelzővel, tripla kamerával, Snapdragon 662-vel és sztereó hanggal. Különleges bónuszként kapunk még egy hatalmas 6000 mAh-s akkumulátort is. Az eladási ár egy tokot és egy képernyővédőt is magába foglal.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (fordította Zoltán Kiss), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
, , , , , ,
hasonló találatok
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Poco M Széria)
Processzor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Kryo 260
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Kijelző
6.53 hüvelyk 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Kapacitív, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, FHD+, sunlight mode, fényes: igen, 60 Hz
Háttértár
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107.5 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infraport, Audió csatlakozók: 3.5mm-es audió port, Kártyaolvasó: microSD 512 GB-ig (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: közelségérzékelő, gyorsulásmérő, elektronikus iránytű, vibrációs motor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3
Hálózat
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (bands 2/3/5/8), 3G (bands B1/2/4/5/8), 4G (bands 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41), head SAR 0,597 W/kg, body SAR 0,807 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 9.6 x 162.3 x 77.3
Akkumulátor
6000 mAh Lítium-Polimer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operációs rendszer
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (1/2" szenzor méret, f/1.79, 6P lencse, AF, 0.8μm pixel méret, 1.6μm 4 az 1-ben szuperpixel) + 2MP makró kamera (1.75μm pixel méret, f/2.4, FF) + 2MP mélységérzékelő (1.75μm pixel méret, f/2.4), videók [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 8MP (1.12μm pixel méret, f/2.05)
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: dual speakers, Billentyűzet: virtuális, 22.5 wattos hálózati adapter, USB-C kábel, SIM-kiadó eszköz, védőtok, képernyővédő, használati útmutató, jótállási jegy, MIUI 12, 24 Hónap Garancia, fanless
Súly
198 g, Tápegység: 65 g
Ár
169 Euró
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78 %
07/2021
Xiaomi Poco M3
SD 662, Adreno 610
198 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.53"2340x1080
78 %
09/2020
Motorola Moto G9 Play
SD 662, Adreno 610
200 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
80 %
09/2020
realme 7
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4
196.5 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
80 %
04/2020
Samsung Galaxy M21
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
188 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2340x1080
75 %
06/2020
Sony Xperia L4
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
178 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.20"1680x720
80 %
12/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
199 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.53"2340x1080

Size Comparison

165.2 mm 75.7 mm 9.2 mm 200 g162.3 mm 77.3 mm 9.6 mm 198 g162.3 mm 75.4 mm 9.4 mm 196.5 g162.3 mm 77.2 mm 8.9 mm 199 g159 mm 75.1 mm 8.9 mm 188 g159 mm 71 mm 8.7 mm 178 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=303, last 2 years)
415 MBit/s ∼100% +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
347 (172min - 352max) MBit/s ∼84% +22%
realme 7
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (209min - 355max) MBit/s ∼83% +21%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
304 (285min - 323max) MBit/s ∼73% +7%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
284 (186min - 366max) MBit/s ∼68%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Adreno 610, SD 662, 64 GB eMMC Flash
237 (21min - 330max) MBit/s ∼57% -17%
Sony Xperia L4
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
109 (103min - 114max) MBit/s ∼26% -62%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=303, last 2 years)
419 MBit/s ∼100% +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
355 (327min - 366max) MBit/s ∼85% +18%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
332 (231min - 352max) MBit/s ∼79% +10%
Xiaomi Poco M3
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
301 (209min - 341max) MBit/s ∼72%
realme 7
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 (252min - 311max) MBit/s ∼69% -4%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Adreno 610, SD 662, 64 GB eMMC Flash
239 (26min - 333max) MBit/s ∼57% -21%
Sony Xperia L4
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
120 (106min - 124max) MBit/s ∼29% -60%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360283338328252288338336281265339341255283331332268248337333313225333328292238327328319209320283338328252288338336281265339341255283331332268248337333313225333328292238327328319209320326296232265326314281225314324236270327330251241275366256239323292299186304326293192302309Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø300 (209-341)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø284 (186-366)
Xiaomi Poco M3: overall route
Xiaomi Poco M3: overall route
Xiaomi Poco M3: lake
Xiaomi Poco M3: lake
Xiaomi Poco M3: turning point
Xiaomi Poco M3: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: overall route
Garmin Edge 500: overall route
Garmin Edge 500: lake
Garmin Edge 500: lake
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Szene 1Tageslicht-Szene 25-facher ZoomLowlight
click to load images
ColorChecker
5.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M3: 5.6 ∆E min: 2.37 - max: 8.92 ∆E
ColorChecker
30.2 ∆E
55.4 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
63.6 ∆E
55 ∆E
34.9 ∆E
44 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
67.1 ∆E
65.8 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
49.2 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
78.6 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
94.5 ∆E
71.9 ∆E
53 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M3: 47.74 ∆E min: 14.11 - max: 94.47 ∆E
414
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 465 cd/m² Átlag: 428 cd/m² Minimum: 2.35 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 89 %
Centrumban: 465 cd/m²
Kontraszt: 2214:1 (Fekete: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
96.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Xiaomi Poco M3
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
Motorola Moto G9 Play
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
realme 7
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy M21
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40
Sony Xperia L4
IPS, 1680x720, 6.20
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
IPS LCD, 2340x1080, 6.53
Screen
-82%
-65%
9%
-87%
-9%
Brightness middle
465
450
-3%
525
13%
617
33%
429
-8%
553
19%
Brightness
428
428
0%
512
20%
614
43%
404
-6%
527
23%
Brightness Distribution
89
88
-1%
90
1%
95
7%
92
3%
89
0%
Black Level *
0.21
0.23
-10%
0.55
-162%
0.26
-24%
0.12
43%
Contrast
2214
1957
-12%
955
-57%
1650
-25%
4608
108%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.7
5.49
-223%
4.4
-159%
2.11
-24%
6.14
-261%
3.8
-124%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.5
10.19
-191%
6.75
-93%
3.41
3%
10.51
-200%
8.7
-149%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
7.5
-213%
4.3
-79%
2.6
-8%
6.6
-175%
2.2
8%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.495 88%
2.3 96%
2.073 106%
2.23 99%
2.3 96%
CCT
6664 98%
8711 75%
7472 87%
6921 94%
8346 78%
6727 97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 892.9 Hz ≤ 3 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 892.9 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 3 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 892.9 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 14804 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.1 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
316 Points ∼56%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
314 Points ∼56% -1%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
506 Points ∼90% +60%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
349 Points ∼62% +10%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
150 Points ∼27% -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
356 Points ∼63% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (305 - 316, n=8)
312 Points ∼55% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=235, last 2 years)
565 Points ∼100% +79%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1275 Points ∼66%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1397 Points ∼72% +10%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
1622 Points ∼84% +27%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1322 Points ∼68% +4%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
883 Points ∼46% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1259 Points ∼65% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1234 - 1453, n=8)
1355 Points ∼70% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=235, last 2 years)
1939 Points ∼100% +52%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2121 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1208 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1179 Points ∼56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (442 - 498, n=4)
466 Points ∼22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=125, last 2 years)
2045 Points ∼96%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2257 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1565 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1198 Points ∼53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (345 - 376, n=6)
366 Points ∼16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=129, last 2 years)
2133 Points ∼95%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
7247 Points ∼51%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
8610 Points ∼61% +19%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
14164 Points ∼100% +95%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6043 Points ∼43% -17%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6909 Points ∼49% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
11421 Points ∼81% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (7247 - 8714, n=8)
7986 Points ∼56% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=223, last 2 years)
9982 Points ∼70% +38%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
6042 Points ∼62%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
6296 Points ∼64% +4%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
9797 Points ∼100% +62%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5892 Points ∼60% -2%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5251 Points ∼54% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
8698 Points ∼89% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (5866 - 7184, n=9)
6258 Points ∼64% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=267, last 2 years)
7878 Points ∼80% +30%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
22329 Points ∼55%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
22131 Points ∼55% -1%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
29819 Points ∼74% +34%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23670 Points ∼59% +6%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
12161 Points ∼30% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (22131 - 22897, n=4)
22483 Points ∼56% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=207, last 2 years)
40247 Points ∼100% +80%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
23495 Points ∼40%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
23379 Points ∼40% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
36546 Points ∼63% +56%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25024 Points ∼43% +7%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11549 Points ∼20% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (23379 - 24043, n=4)
23648 Points ∼41% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=207, last 2 years)
58049 Points ∼100% +147%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
19025 Points ∼82%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
18647 Points ∼80% -2%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
18136 Points ∼78% -5%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
19902 Points ∼85% +5%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
14930 Points ∼64% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (18647 - 19804, n=4)
19225 Points ∼82% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=207, last 2 years)
23323 Points ∼100% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1797 Points ∼53%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1862 Points ∼55% +4%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3252 Points ∼96% +81%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2110 Points ∼63% +17%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
741 Points ∼22% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1797 - 1889, n=7)
1846 Points ∼55% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=261, last 2 years)
3370 Points ∼100% +88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1715 Points ∼44%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1743 Points ∼44% +2%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3254 Points ∼83% +90%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2092 Points ∼53% +22%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
680 Points ∼17% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1681 - 1765, n=7)
1732 Points ∼44% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=261, last 2 years)
3942 Points ∼100% +130%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2161 Points ∼67%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2444 Points ∼75% +13%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3247 Points ∼100% +50%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2176 Points ∼67% +1%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1084 Points ∼33% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2161 - 2543, n=7)
2412 Points ∼74% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=261, last 2 years)
2757 Points ∼85% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1861 Points ∼47%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1891 Points ∼48% +2%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3170 Points ∼80% +70%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1662 Points ∼42% -11%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
836 Points ∼21% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1819 - 1914, n=7)
1879 Points ∼48% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=277, last 2 years)
3947 Points ∼100% +112%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1779 Points ∼36%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1786 Points ∼36% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3148 Points ∼63% +77%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1601 Points ∼32% -10%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
782 Points ∼16% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1737 - 1794, n=7)
1777 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=277, last 2 years)
4982 Points ∼100% +180%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2221 Points ∼68%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2384 Points ∼73% +7%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3249 Points ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1917 Points ∼59% -14%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1106 Points ∼34% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2146 - 2502, n=7)
2334 Points ∼72% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=275, last 2 years)
2908 Points ∼90% +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1173 Points ∼43%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1177 Points ∼43% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2722 Points ∼100% +132%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1563 Points ∼57% +33%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
470 Points ∼17% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1151 - 1905, n=7)
1276 Points ∼47% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=259, last 2 years)
2628 Points ∼97% +124%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1022 Points ∼37%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1022 Points ∼37% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2599 Points ∼93% +154%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1445 Points ∼52% +41%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
405 Points ∼15% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (998 - 1074, n=7)
1027 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=259, last 2 years)
2784 Points ∼100% +172%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2424 Points ∼74%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2499 Points ∼77% +3%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3261 Points ∼100% +35%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2186 Points ∼67% -10%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1078 Points ∼33% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2351 - 2513, n=7)
2456 Points ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=259, last 2 years)
2803 Points ∼86% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1176 Points ∼37%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1184 Points ∼37% +1%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2784 Points ∼87% +137%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1650 Points ∼52% +40%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
536 Points ∼17% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1124 - 1197, n=7)
1172 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=275, last 2 years)
3191 Points ∼100% +171%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1032 Points ∼29%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1034 Points ∼29% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2682 Points ∼75% +160%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1532 Points ∼43% +48%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
467 Points ∼13% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (980 - 1081, n=7)
1032 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=275, last 2 years)
3565 Points ∼100% +245%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2298 Points ∼72%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2399 Points ∼75% +4%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3213 Points ∼100% +40%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2260 Points ∼70% -2%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1102 Points ∼34% -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2164 - 2534, n=7)
2340 Points ∼73% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=275, last 2 years)
2959 Points ∼92% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1096 Points ∼39%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1114 Points ∼40% +2%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2794 Points ∼100% +155%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1550 Points ∼55% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1096 - 1167, n=7)
1120 Points ∼40% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=216, last 2 years)
2634 Points ∼94% +140%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
963 Points ∼33%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
974 Points ∼33% +1%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2788 Points ∼94% +190%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1439 Points ∼49% +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (963 - 1005, n=7)
978 Points ∼33% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=216, last 2 years)
2956 Points ∼100% +207%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2124 Points ∼76%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2250 Points ∼80% +6%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2813 Points ∼100% +32%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2125 Points ∼76% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2124 - 2499, n=7)
2300 Points ∼82% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=216, last 2 years)
2651 Points ∼94% +25%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
369 Points ∼13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (369 - 385, n=6)
376 Points ∼14% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=91, last 2 years)
2735 Points ∼100% +641%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
369 Points ∼13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (366 - 369, n=3)
367 Points ∼12% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=88, last 2 years)
2941 Points ∼100% +697%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
32 fps ∼56%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
29 fps ∼51% -9%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
45 fps ∼79% +41%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
31 fps ∼54% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (29 - 51, n=8)
38.9 fps ∼68% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=216, last 2 years)
57 fps ∼100% +78%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
35 fps ∼33%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
35 fps ∼33% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
81 fps ∼76% +131%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
35 fps ∼33% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (34 - 36, n=8)
35.1 fps ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=216, last 2 years)
106 fps ∼100% +203%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
17 fps ∼38%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
33 fps ∼73% +94%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
42 fps ∼94% +147%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
19 fps ∼42% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (17 - 34, n=8)
25.6 fps ∼57% +51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=214, last 2 years)
44.9 fps ∼100% +164%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼31%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼31% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
52 fps ∼84% +174%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
18 fps ∼29% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (19 - 21, n=8)
19.4 fps ∼31% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=215, last 2 years)
61.9 fps ∼100% +226%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps ∼34%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
25 fps ∼71% +108%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
29 fps ∼82% +142%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼40% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (12 - 26, n=8)
19 fps ∼54% +58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=213, last 2 years)
35.4 fps ∼100% +195%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼31%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼31% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
33 fps ∼78% +154%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16 fps ∼38% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (13 - 14, n=8)
13.1 fps ∼31% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=213, last 2 years)
42.4 fps ∼100% +226%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
6.4 fps ∼29%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼59% +103%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
17 fps ∼77% +166%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼40% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (6.4 - 14, n=8)
9.98 fps ∼45% +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=212, last 2 years)
22.1 fps ∼100% +245%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼28%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
7 fps ∼28% -1%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
19 fps ∼75% +168%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼39% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (7 - 7.3, n=8)
7.18 fps ∼28% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=212, last 2 years)
25.4 fps ∼100% +258%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
7.5 fps ∼34%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼68% +100%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
19 fps ∼86% +153%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.2 fps ∼41% +23%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.4 fps ∼29% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (7.5 - 15, n=8)
11.2 fps ∼50% +49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=281, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼100% +196%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
8.3 fps ∼33%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
8.3 fps ∼33% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
21 fps ∼82% +153%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼39% +20%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.8 fps ∼15% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (8.2 - 8.6, n=8)
8.4 fps ∼33% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=280, last 2 years)
25.5 fps ∼100% +207%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4.4 fps ∼30%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
9 fps ∼61% +105%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
12 fps ∼82% +173%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.6 fps ∼38% +27%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.1 fps ∼28% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (4.4 - 9.6, n=8)
6.91 fps ∼47% +57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=281, last 2 years)
14.7 fps ∼100% +234%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼28%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼28% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
7.7 fps ∼76% +175%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼35% +25%
Sony Xperia L4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.4 fps ∼14% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2.6 - 2.9, n=8)
2.79 fps ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=280, last 2 years)
10.1 fps ∼100% +261%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
183808 Points ∼55%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
177145 Points ∼53% -4%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
295778 Points ∼89% +61%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
180019 Points ∼54% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (167471 - 185542, n=8)
177515 Points ∼54% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=186, last 2 years)
331491 Points ∼100% +80%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4660 Points ∼8%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
12399 Points ∼21% +166%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (4660 - 15832, n=6)
8392 Points ∼14% +80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 264766, n=65, last 2 years)
58160 Points ∼100% +1148%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2412 Points ∼67%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2406 Points ∼66% 0%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3182 Points ∼88% +32%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2133 Points ∼59% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2285 Points ∼63% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2243 - 2432, n=9)
2345 Points ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=199, last 2 years)
3623 Points ∼100% +50%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4834 Points ∼73%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4911 Points ∼74% +2%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
5564 Points ∼84% +15%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4586 Points ∼69% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
5010 Points ∼76% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (4275 - 5001, n=9)
4853 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=199, last 2 years)
6633 Points ∼100% +37%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
3454 Points ∼82%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
3175 Points ∼75% -8%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3758 Points ∼89% +9%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1759 Points ∼42% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2536 Points ∼60% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2618 - 3454, n=9)
3062 Points ∼72% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=199, last 2 years)
4238 Points ∼100% +23%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1847 Points ∼33%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1806 Points ∼32% -2%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3807 Points ∼68% +106%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2138 Points ∼38% +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1845 Points ∼33% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1773 - 1887, n=9)
1844 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=199, last 2 years)
5605 Points ∼100% +203%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1098 Points ∼85%
Motorola Moto G9 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1191 Points ∼92% +8%
realme 7
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
1288 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy M21
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1200 Points ∼93% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1198 Points ∼93% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1034 - 1228, n=9)
1124 Points ∼87% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=199, last 2 years)
1272 Points ∼99% +16%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=185, last 2 years)
50 Points ∼100% +56%
realme 7 (Chrome 86)
36.933 Points ∼74% +15%
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85)
32.433 Points ∼65% +1%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
32.041 Points ∼64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (30.4 - 32.4, n=9)
31.5 Points ∼63% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
30.642 Points ∼61% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
29.951 Points ∼60% -7%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=193, last 2 years)
89.7 Points ∼100% +81%
realme 7 (Chrome 86)
70.824 Points ∼79% +43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
53.874 Points ∼60% +9%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
49.497 Points ∼55% 0%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
49.459 Points ∼55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (47.8 - 49.7, n=7)
49.2 Points ∼55% -1%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=166, last 2 years)
50.7 runs/min ∼100% +74%
realme 7 (Chome 86)
34.2 runs/min ∼67% +17%
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chome 85)
29.2 runs/min ∼58% 0%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
29.2 runs/min ∼58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (26.5 - 29.3, n=8)
28.3 runs/min ∼56% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
27 runs/min ∼53% -8%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chome 85)
26.6 runs/min ∼52% -9%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=203, last 2 years)
77.9 Points ∼100% +47%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
55 Points ∼71% +4%
realme 7 (Chrome 86)
55 Points ∼71% +4%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
53 Points ∼68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (51 - 59, n=9)
52.7 Points ∼68% -1%
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85)
52 Points ∼67% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
45 Points ∼58% -15%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=210, last 2 years)
17317 Points ∼100% +90%
realme 7 (Chrome 86)
15814 Points ∼91% +73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
10299 Points ∼59% +13%
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
9810 Points ∼57% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (8893 - 9879, n=9)
9305 Points ∼54% +2%
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85)
9264 Points ∼53% +2%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
9125 Points ∼53%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85)
4664.3 ms * ∼100% -3%
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
4536.9 ms * ∼97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (4322 - 4650, n=9)
4508 ms * ∼97% +1%
Motorola Moto G9 Play (Chrome 85)
4443.5 ms * ∼95% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=212, last 2 years)
3993 ms * ∼86% +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
3901.3 ms * ∼84% +14%
realme 7 (Chrome 86)
3380.6 ms * ∼72% +25%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Poco M3Motorola Moto G9 Playrealme 7Samsung Galaxy M21Sony Xperia L4Xiaomi Redmi Note 9Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-23%
-3%
-13%
-38%
-19%
13%
3%
Sequential Read 256KB
509.23
315.2
-38%
529
4%
487.8
-4%
293.4
-42%
306.57
-40%
704 (482 - 989, n=11)
38%
751 (41.9 - 2037, n=286, last 2 years)
47%
Sequential Write 256KB
269.2
187.2
-30%
200
-26%
192.7
-28%
165
-39%
248.14
-8%
384 (241 - 710, n=11)
43%
328 (11.9 - 1321, n=286, last 2 years)
22%
Random Read 4KB
147.03
98.4
-33%
153.3
4%
126
-14%
61.2
-58%
65.13
-56%
151 (105 - 208, n=11)
3%
134 (13.5 - 325, n=286, last 2 years)
-9%
Random Write 4KB
154.1
96.1
-38%
151.3
-2%
124.2
-19%
22.5
-85%
146.94
-5%
158 (121 - 207, n=11)
3%
120 (4.97 - 330, n=286, last 2 years)
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
85.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
84.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
77.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
84.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
82.3 (77.2 - 85.9, n=3)
-4%
75.9 (13.4 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
66.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
62.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
63.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
59.1 (49.6 - 64.2, n=3)
-8%
58.2 (8.4 - 83.3, n=175, last 2 years)
-9%
05101520253035404550556037342840515459464951494850474651514951505052514644494441484850504948495053514845454148535859565558595753535655555245404549494543435045474546474755595856575754545349464643464750525359545254595346524542474648555143395860605960605955534947454038384442505153515257545151484844444348533734284051545946495149485047465151495150505251464449444148485050494849505351484545414853585956555859575353565555524540454949454343504547454647475559585657575454534946464346475052535954525459534652454247464855514339586060596060595553494745403838444250515351525754515148484444434853252624252525252525252525252525252425252521212625242525252525262425252624252526242425252525252225252525242524252525252525252525252524252524262525242425252425252525252425252523242624232625252426252525242522252525252524252525242524252525242625242525252425252525252425252525262425252525Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.56.8: Ø49.7 (28-60)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.1.0: Ø24.8 (21-26)
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco M3
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % ∼100%
Max. terhelés
 34 °C33.7 °C34.8 °C 
 33.3 °C33.1 °C37.5 °C 
 33.2 °C31.3 °C33.3 °C 
Maximum: 37.5 °C
Átlag: 33.8 °C
29.7 °C30.9 °C32.9 °C
30 °C31.3 °C32.8 °C
30 °C30.1 °C30.9 °C
Maximum: 32.9 °C
Átlag: 31 °C
Tápegység (max.)  27.9 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203839.72528.933.73123.8214025.323.35039336323.429.68019.317.610016.123.412510.53016015.346.420015452509.652.931512.45740010.164.450011.466.96301168.480014.570.9100010.968.5125013.572.8160010.873.3200011.475.825001275.4315012.575.340001375.3500013.173630013.668.6800013.471.21000013.572.71250013.967.81600014.755SPL24.885.1N0.662.4median 13median 68.5Delta1.69.838.941.436.838.333.135.132.935.235.337.328.728.119.121.820.421.620.519.317.227.314.237.314.545.814.550.812.85413.456.813.661.718.966.218.672.621.273.714.975.214.174.414.672.614.769.415.566.616.263.11766.81875.518.876.619.663.220.549.562.158.42983.814.110.61.154.2median 16.2median 63.22.512.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco M3Samsung Galaxy M21
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco M3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy M21 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.01 / 0.08 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 0.5 / 1.84 / 1.87 Watt
Terhelés midlight 3.99 / 6.01 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Poco M3
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M21
6000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
5020 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-47%
-18%
-42%
-26%
Idle Minimum *
0.5
1.2
-140%
0.74
-48%
0.809 (0.49 - 1.38, n=8)
-62%
0.934 (0.37 - 2.5, n=234, last 2 years)
-87%
Idle Average *
1.84
1.8
2%
2.17
-18%
2.58 (1.5 - 4.92, n=8)
-40%
1.843 (0.65 - 3.94, n=234, last 2 years)
-0%
Idle Maximum *
1.87
2.1
-12%
2.2
-18%
2.78 (1.63 - 4.95, n=8)
-49%
2.1 (0.69 - 4.2, n=234, last 2 years)
-12%
Load Average *
3.99
6.2
-55%
4.17
-5%
5.33 (3.57 - 7.21, n=8)
-34%
4.46 (2.1 - 8.4, n=234, last 2 years)
-12%
Load Maximum *
6.01
7.9
-31%
6.11
-2%
7.52 (5.2 - 9.32, n=8)
-25%
7.24 (3.16 - 12.3, n=234, last 2 years)
-20%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
45h 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
20h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 24min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
6h 44min
Xiaomi Poco M3
6000 mAh
Motorola Moto G9 Play
5000 mAh
realme 7
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M21
6000 mAh
Sony Xperia L4
3580 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
5020 mAh
Battery Runtime
-23%
-19%
-6%
-37%
-19%
Reader / Idle
2756
2297
-17%
2294
-17%
H.264
1164
1352
16%
1116
-4%
WiFi v1.3
1249
962
-23%
1006
-19%
1298
4%
783
-37%
867
-31%
Load
404
289
-28%
314
-22%

Pro

+ könnyű és szilárd ház
+ dual SIM + MicroSD
+ LTE, Bluetooth 5.0, WiFi 5
+ védőtok és képernyővédő
+ nappali fényben elfogadható kamera
+ gyors ujjlenyomat-olvasó
+ megfelelő teljesítmény a mindennapi használatra
+ sztereó hangszórók
+ nagyon hosszú üzemidő

Kontra

- nincs NFC
- helyenként nehézkes működés
- Az IPS kijelző nem túl világos
- a játékok csak bizonyos korlátozások mellett futnak

Összegzés - 150 euróért sok mindent kapunk.

Testing the Xiaomi Poco M3. Test unit provided by Xiaomi Germany.
Testing the Xiaomi Poco M3. Test unit provided by Xiaomi Germany.

A 64 GB-os Xiaomi Poco M3 a 150 eurós eladási árával nagyon megfizethetőnek számít. Még a 128 GB-os verzió is megfizethető a maga 170 eurós árával. 4 gb RAM-mal és a Snapdragon 662-vel viszont ez az olcsó telefon nem egy teljesítmény-bajnok, és időnként nehézkesen reagál. Mindennapi feladatokhoz viszont a teljesítmény még így is elegendő, és néha még egy-két játékot is futtathatunk rajta. Másrészt viszont egy valamivel világosabb IPS képernyőt szerettünk volna látni, mivel a kijelző, ami egyébként jó, kültéri használatkor gyorsan a korlátaiba ütközik. outdoors.

A Xiaomi Poco M3 szolid teljesítményt nyújt, és emellett többek között sztereó hangszórókkal és egy nagy 6000 mAh-s akkumulátorral is pontokat szerez.

A Poco M3 további felszereltsége meglepően széles körű: Tripla kamera, amely nappal elfogadható fotókat készít, emellett valódi dual SIM, és még sztereó hangszórók is, ami ebben az árkategóriában ritkaságnak számít. De az igazi fénypont a 6000-mAh-s akkumulátor, amely nagyon hosszú üzemidővel látja el a Xiaomi-t. Az akkumulátor kevesebb mint 3 óra alatt feltölthető.

Összességében a Poco M3 jó teljesítménnyel rendelkezik, viszont nem számít bajnoknak az olcsó telefonok között. A Samsung Galaxy M21 például szintén a 200 eurós határ alatt marad, és jobban teljesít. A Samsung szintén 6000 mAh-s akkumulátort kínál, viszont a kijelzője egyértelműen jobb az AMOLED képernyővel, és NFC-vel is rendelkezik, viszont a sztereó hangszórók hiányoznak.

Ár és Elérhetőség

A Poco M3 64 GB-os verzióját a Xiaomi (német) online üzletében 150 euróért, a 128 GB-s verzió pedig 170 euróért vehetjük meg. Az Amazon-nál (Németország) az árak valamivel magasabbak. (Az USA-ban a Poco M3 két verziója 149/169 dollárért érhető el a globális terjesztőknél.)

Xiaomi Poco M3 - 01/15/2021 v7
Manuel Masiero

Váz
81%
Billentyűzet
67 / 75 → 89%
Érintőpad
88%
Csatlakoztathatóság
46 / 70 → 66%
Súly
88%
Akkumulátor
92%
Kijelző
88%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
13 / 64 → 20%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
60 / 86 → 70%
Hőmérséklet
93%
Zaj
100%
Audio
81 / 90 → 90%
Camera
51%
Átlag
73%
78%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Mark Riege
Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 220 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018
Ninh Duy
Translator: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 186446 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Xiaomi Poco M3 Smartphone rövid értékelés: A 150 eurós okostelefon
Manuel Masiero, 2021-07- 5 (Update: 2021-07- 5)