Notebookcheck

Xiaomi Mi 11 rövid értékelés: Erős zászlóshajó okostelefon korlátozásokkal

Végre WQHD+-szal. A Xiaomi Mi 11 elég magasra állítja az ár-teljesítmény mércéjét 2021-ben. A Xiaomi zászlóshajó okostelefonja a legújabb csúcskategóriás Snapdragon 888 processzorral, 108 MP-es kamerával, 120 Hz-es Super AMOLED panellel és Harman Kardon sztereó hangszórókkal debütál, aránylag alacsony áron. A továbbiakban kiderül, hogy a Xiaomi megéri-e az árát.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (fordította Zoltán Kiss), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Touchscreen Smartphone Android
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Mi 11 Széria)
Processzor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Grafikus adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 660
Memória
8192 MB 
Kijelző
6.81 hüvelyk 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 515 PPI, kapacitív érintőképernyő, LED DotDisplay, fényes: igen, HDR, 120 Hz
Háttértár
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 105 GB ingyenes
Csatlakozók
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audió csatlakozók: USB Type-C, 1 Ujjlenyomat olvasó, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Szenzorok: Közelségérzékelő, gyorsulásmérő, giroszkóp, elektronikus iránytű, Miracast, IR blaster, OTG
Hálózat
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 5G: n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n41, n77, n78, n79; 4G: FDD-LTE band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 66, TDD-LTE band 38, 40, 41, 42; 3G: WCDMA band 1,2,4,5,8; 2G: GSM 850 900 1800 1900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Méret
magasság x szélesség x mélység (mm-ben) 8.06 x 164.3 x 74.6
Akkumulátor
4600 mAh Lítium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operációs rendszer
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (1/1.33" szenzor méret, 0.8 μm pixel méret, 1.6 μm 4 az 1-ben szuperpixel, f/1.85, OIS); 13 MP (FOV 123°, f/2.4); 5 MP (makró, f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.2, 0.8 μm pixel méret)
További jellegzetességek
Hangszórók: sztereó, Harman Kardon hangzás, Billentyűzet: képernyőn, Hálózati adapter, USB-C kábel, C -> 3.5 mm fülhallgató adapter, SIM kiadó eszköz, MiUI 12, 12 Hónap Garancia, Widevine L1 (L3 - CN verzió), fanless
Súly
196 g
Ár
799 Euró
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
hasonló találatok
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87 %
07/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.81"3200x1440
88 %
04/2020
OnePlus 8 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
199 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.78"3168x1440
89 %
04/2020
Huawei P40 Pro
Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16
209 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.58"2640x1200
84 %
10/2020
Google Pixel 5
SD 765G, Adreno 620
151 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.00"2340x1080
83 %
07/2020
Oppo Reno4 Pro
SD 765G, Adreno 620
172 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
89 %
02/2021
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14
200 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
Xiaomi Mi 11 smartphone review
Xiaomi Mi 11 smartphone review
Xiaomi Mi 11 smartphone review
Xiaomi Mi 11 smartphone review
Xiaomi Mi 11 smartphone review
Xiaomi Mi 11 smartphone review
Xiaomi Mi 11 smartphone review
Xiaomi Mi 11 smartphone review
Xiaomi Mi 11 smartphone review

Size comparison

165.3 mm 74.3 mm 8.5 mm 199 g164.3 mm 74.6 mm 8.06 mm 196 g161.5 mm 75.6 mm 7.8 mm 200 g159.6 mm 72.5 mm 7.6 mm 172 g158.2 mm 72.6 mm 8.95 mm 209 g144.7 mm 70.4 mm 8 mm 151 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1544 (797min - 1619max) MBit/s ∼100% +197%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
876 (767min - 904max) MBit/s ∼57% +69%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
747 (650min - 862max) MBit/s ∼48% +44%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
600 (305min - 657max) MBit/s ∼39% +16%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
601 (504min - 628max) MBit/s ∼39% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
519 (391min - 604max) MBit/s ∼34%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
483 (479min - 493max) MBit/s ∼31% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=303, last 2 years)
415 MBit/s ∼27% -20%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
855 (827min - 886max) MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 (804min - 879max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
842 (329min - 976max) MBit/s ∼98%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
831 (745min - 872max) MBit/s ∼97% -1%
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
821 (388min - 998max) MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (599min - 658max) MBit/s ∼74% -25%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
625 (521min - 652max) MBit/s ∼73% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=303, last 2 years)
419 MBit/s ∼49% -50%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950329664688676693706707702705714711720766883909913925935952957971970976968930971956960961965329664688676693706707702705714711720766883909913925935952957971970976968930971956960961965489458519567493466556515507523556565580524540485499487461391530498480534541532570604517573Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø829 (329-976)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø519 (391-604)
Garmin Edge 500 GPS
Garmin Edge 500 GPS
Garmin Edge 500 GPS
Garmin Edge 500 GPS
Garmin Edge 500 GPS
Garmin Edge 500 GPS
Xiaomi Mi 11 GPS
Xiaomi Mi 11 GPS
Xiaomi Mi 11 GPS
Xiaomi Mi 11 GPS
Xiaomi Mi 11 GPS
Xiaomi Mi 11 GPS
Ultra wide-angle
Ultra wide-angle
Wide-angle
30x zoom (max)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleLow-lightUltra wide-angle5x zoom
ColorChecker
21.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
16 ∆E
24 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
15 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 11: 11.14 ∆E min: 1.21 - max: 23.96 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
62.9 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
27 ∆E
65.4 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
76.3 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
89.7 ∆E
70.3 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 11: 46.41 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 89.72 ∆E
846
cd/m²
839
cd/m²
852
cd/m²
847
cd/m²
840
cd/m²
850
cd/m²
843
cd/m²
833
cd/m²
851
cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 852 cd/m² Átlag: 844.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.38 cd/m²
Fényerő megoszlás: 98 %
Centrumban: 840 cd/m²
Kontraszt: ∞:1 (Fekete: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Xiaomi Mi 11
LED DotDisplay, 3200x1440, 6.81
OnePlus 8 Pro
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.78
Huawei P40 Pro
OLED, 2640x1200, 6.58
Google Pixel 5
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.00
Oppo Reno4 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2400x1080, 6.70
Screen
19%
-5%
3%
-81%
-13%
Brightness middle
840
796
-5%
584
-30%
635
-24%
790
-6%
814
-3%
Brightness
845
779
-8%
576
-32%
636
-25%
789
-7%
814
-4%
Brightness Distribution
98
94
-4%
95
-3%
97
-1%
95
-3%
97
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.2
0.68
43%
1.1
8%
0.8
33%
2.8
-133%
2
-67%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.7
1.55
43%
2.3
15%
2.2
19%
7.7
-185%
3.6
-33%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
1.1
45%
1.8
10%
1.7
15%
5
-150%
1.4
30%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.237 98%
2.16 102%
2.23 99%
2.29 96%
2.12 104%
CCT
6492 100%
6310 103%
6355 102%
6492 100%
6716 97%
6568 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 485.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 485.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 485.4 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 14804 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.1 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1136 Points ∼86%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
909 Points ∼69% -20%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
779 Points ∼59% -31%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
598 Points ∼45% -47%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
608 Points ∼46% -46%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
1100 Points ∼83% -3%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
1326 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1106 Points ∼83% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (989 - 1156, n=14)
1119 Points ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=234, last 2 years)
566 Points ∼43% -50%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3784 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3318 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3165 Points ∼84% -16%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1635 Points ∼43% -57%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1784 Points ∼47% -53%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
3364 Points ∼89% -11%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
3476 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
3583 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3379 - 3810, n=14)
3609 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=234, last 2 years)
1940 Points ∼51% -49%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4279 Points ∼68%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
923 Points ∼15% -78%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1145 Points ∼18% -73%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
6259 Points ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
6252 Points ∼100% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3894 - 6176, n=13)
4698 Points ∼75% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=124, last 2 years)
2053 Points ∼33% -52%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4674 Points ∼62%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1256 Points ∼17% -73%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
7514 Points ∼100% +61%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
7400 Points ∼98% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (4566 - 4764, n=13)
4662 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=128, last 2 years)
2141 Points ∼28% -54%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
14586 Points ∼87%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13471 Points ∼80% -8%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
14352 Points ∼86% -2%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
10007 Points ∼60% -31%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9042 Points ∼54% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
15718 Points ∼94% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
16741 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (11823 - 18942, n=7)
14555 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=223, last 2 years)
9982 Points ∼60% -32%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12876 Points ∼90%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11153 Points ∼78% -13%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
11341 Points ∼79% -12%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8954 Points ∼62% -30%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
7820 Points ∼54% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
12255 Points ∼85% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
14362 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10231 - 15027, n=8)
12213 Points ∼85% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=267, last 2 years)
7878 Points ∼55% -39%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
9343 Points ∼97%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8111 Points ∼84% -13%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6508 Points ∼67% -30%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2964 Points ∼31% -68%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3466 Points ∼36% -63%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
8001 Points ∼83% -14%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
7294 Points ∼76% -22%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
9643 Points ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
8345 Points ∼87% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6110 - 9839, n=9)
8882 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=274, last 2 years)
3193 Points ∼33% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12023 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9379 Points ∼77% -22%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6771 Points ∼56% -44%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2834 Points ∼23% -76%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3540 Points ∼29% -71%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
10913 Points ∼90% -9%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
11824 Points ∼97% -2%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
12146 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
10794 Points ∼89% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10037 - 12914, n=9)
11966 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=274, last 2 years)
3570 Points ∼29% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5249 Points ∼92%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5506 Points ∼96% +5%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5728 Points ∼100% +9%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3530 Points ∼62% -33%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3230 Points ∼56% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
4137 Points ∼72% -21%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
3115 Points ∼54% -41%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
5602 Points ∼98% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
4651 Points ∼81% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2579 - 5366, n=9)
4721 Points ∼82% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=274, last 2 years)
2959 Points ∼52% -44%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5599 Points ∼83%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3297 Points ∼49% -41%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1015 Points ∼15% -82%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
5668 Points ∼84% +1%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
6779 Points ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5756 Points ∼85% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5598 - 5942, n=13)
5760 Points ∼85% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=90, last 2 years)
2754 Points ∼41% -51%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5678 Points ∼82%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3310 Points ∼48% -42%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1022 Points ∼15% -82%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
6010 Points ∼87% +6%
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000, Mali-G78 MP24, 8192
6923 Points ∼100% +22%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5873 Points ∼85% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5578 - 5925, n=13)
5768 Points ∼83% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=87, last 2 years)
2964 Points ∼43% -48%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
120 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
45 fps ∼38% -62%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
119 fps ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
104 fps ∼87% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (60 - 143, n=10)
98.3 fps ∼82% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=215, last 2 years)
57 fps ∼48% -52%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
268 fps ∼85%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
206 fps ∼66% -23%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼48% -43%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48 fps ∼15% -82%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
95 fps ∼30% -65%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
242 fps ∼77% -10%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
313.8 fps ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
154 fps ∼49% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (230 - 290, n=10)
266 fps ∼85% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=215, last 2 years)
106 fps ∼34% -60%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
91 fps ∼76%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼50% -34%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
59 fps ∼50% -35%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
30 fps ∼25% -67%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
48 fps ∼40% -47%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
119 fps ∼100% +31%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
59.8 fps ∼50% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
69 fps ∼58% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (55 - 120, n=10)
89.8 fps ∼75% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=213, last 2 years)
45 fps ∼38% -51%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
158 fps ∼93%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
126 fps ∼74% -20%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
118 fps ∼69% -25%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
31 fps ∼18% -80%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
54 fps ∼32% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
161 fps ∼94% +2%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
170.4 fps ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
117 fps ∼69% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (101 - 177, n=10)
151 fps ∼89% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=214, last 2 years)
62 fps ∼36% -61%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
59 fps ∼57%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼58% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
52 fps ∼50% -12%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼20% -64%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
33 fps ∼32% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
103 fps ∼100% +75%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
59 fps ∼57% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
51 fps ∼50% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (36 - 105, n=10)
72.2 fps ∼70% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=212, last 2 years)
35.4 fps ∼34% -40%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
111 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼79% -21%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75 fps ∼68% -32%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
22 fps ∼20% -80%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
37 fps ∼33% -67%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
107 fps ∼96% -4%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
106 fps ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
74 fps ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (69 - 121, n=10)
105 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=212, last 2 years)
42.5 fps ∼38% -62%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
33 fps ∼59%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
45 fps ∼80% +36%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31 fps ∼55% -6%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼23% -61%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼34% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
56 fps ∼100% +70%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
42.9 fps ∼77% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
30 fps ∼54% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (28 - 61, n=10)
46.4 fps ∼83% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=211, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼40% -33%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
67 fps ∼89%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼68% -24%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
44 fps ∼59% -34%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
12 fps ∼16% -82%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼28% -69%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
62 fps ∼83% -7%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
75 fps ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
58 fps ∼77% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (42 - 72, n=10)
63.1 fps ∼84% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=211, last 2 years)
25.5 fps ∼34% -62%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
41 fps ∼64%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps ∼75% +17%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
36 fps ∼56% -12%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼20% -68%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼33% -49%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
64 fps ∼100% +56%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
53.5 fps ∼84% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
37 fps ∼58% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (38 - 73, n=13)
56.4 fps ∼88% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=280, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼35% -46%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
79 fps ∼93%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼64% -32%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
50 fps ∼59% -37%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼15% -84%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
23 fps ∼27% -71%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
64 fps ∼75% -19%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
85 fps ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
69 fps ∼81% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (57 - 87, n=14)
73.5 fps ∼86% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=279, last 2 years)
25.6 fps ∼30% -68%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
25 fps ∼57%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps ∼70% +24%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
23 fps ∼52% -8%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.8 fps ∼20% -65%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼30% -48%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
44 fps ∼100% +76%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
40 fps ∼91% +60%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
26 fps ∼59% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (25 - 46, n=13)
37.8 fps ∼86% +51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=280, last 2 years)
14.8 fps ∼34% -41%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
29 fps ∼97%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼67% -31%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼63% -34%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5.3 fps ∼18% -82%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.4 fps ∼28% -71%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
27 fps ∼90% -7%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
30 fps ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
28 fps ∼93% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (26 - 32, n=13)
28.7 fps ∼96% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=279, last 2 years)
10.1 fps ∼34% -65%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
700592 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
585231 Points ∼82% -16%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
496966 Points ∼70% -29%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
288970 Points ∼41% -59%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
316129 Points ∼44% -55%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
617805 Points ∼87% -12%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
510245 Points ∼72% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
633158 Points ∼89% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (673630 - 740847, n=7)
711441 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=186, last 2 years)
331491 Points ∼47% -53%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
209984 Points ∼90%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73666 Points ∼32% -65%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
226728 Points ∼97% +8%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
92533 Points ∼40% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (171404 - 264766, n=8)
233278 Points ∼100% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 264766, n=64, last 2 years)
58995 Points ∼25% -72%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6361 Points ∼97%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5993 Points ∼91% -6%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5589 Points ∼85% -12%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3290 Points ∼50% -48%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3949 Points ∼60% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
6144 Points ∼94% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
6247 Points ∼95% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6031 - 6959, n=10)
6558 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=198, last 2 years)
3625 Points ∼55% -43%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10377 Points ∼95%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10058 Points ∼92% -3%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9782 Points ∼89% -6%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5960 Points ∼54% -43%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6807 Points ∼62% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
10492 Points ∼96% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
10936 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9696 - 11774, n=10)
10849 Points ∼99% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=198, last 2 years)
6635 Points ∼61% -36%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8789 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7240 Points ∼82% -18%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6038 Points ∼69% -31%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5381 Points ∼61% -39%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4929 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
6246 Points ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
6588 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5352 - 9044, n=10)
7590 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=198, last 2 years)
4241 Points ∼48% -52%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12732 Points ∼87%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11842 Points ∼81% -7%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10138 Points ∼69% -20%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2560 Points ∼17% -80%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5178 Points ∼35% -59%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
14636 Points ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
14362 Points ∼98% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (12630 - 15628, n=10)
13643 Points ∼93% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=198, last 2 years)
5613 Points ∼38% -56%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1434 Points ∼85%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1496 Points ∼89% +4%
Huawei P40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1629 Points ∼97% +14%
Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1428 Points ∼85% 0%
Oppo Reno4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1399 Points ∼83% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192
1486 Points ∼88% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1471 Points ∼87% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1434 - 1983, n=10)
1685 Points ∼100% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=198, last 2 years)
1272 Points ∼75% -11%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (61.3 - 108, n=7)
89.1 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
83.152 Points ∼93%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
69.956 Points ∼79% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
66.27 Points ∼74% -20%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
63.374 Points ∼71% -24%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
50.811 Points ∼57% -39%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=184, last 2 years)
50 Points ∼56% -40%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (119 - 192, n=9)
152 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
137.89 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
117.78 Points ∼77% -15%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
116.61 Points ∼77% -15%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
114.78 Points ∼76% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=192, last 2 years)
89.7 Points ∼59% -35%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
88.938 Points ∼59% -36%
Oppo Reno4 Pro (Chrome 86)
53.546 Points ∼35% -61%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
85.8 runs/min ∼100% +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (54.7 - 114, n=7)
82.9 runs/min ∼97% +32%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
71.8 runs/min ∼84% +14%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chome 80)
67.7 runs/min ∼79% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
62.8 runs/min ∼73%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=165, last 2 years)
50.7 runs/min ∼59% -19%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
49.2 runs/min ∼57% -22%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (103 - 160, n=9)
132 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
124 Points ∼94%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
104 Points ∼79% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
102 Points ∼77% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=202, last 2 years)
78 Points ∼59% -37%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
77 Points ∼58% -38%
Oppo Reno4 Pro (Chrome 86)
50 Points ∼38% -60%
Huawei P40 Pro
Points ∼0% -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (23491 - 38401, n=10)
31439 Points ∼100% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
28247 Points ∼90% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
27539 Points ∼88%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
23690 Points ∼75% -14%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
23678 Points ∼75% -14%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
18629 Points ∼59% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=209, last 2 years)
17325 Points ∼55% -37%
Oppo Reno4 Pro (Chrome 86)
11059 Points ∼35% -60%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Oppo Reno4 Pro (Chrome 86)
4533.9 ms * ∼100% -163%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=211, last 2 years)
3999 ms * ∼88% -132%
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
2469.8 ms * ∼54% -43%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
1944.7 ms * ∼43% -13%
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1)
1913.7 ms * ∼42% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)
1743.6 ms * ∼38% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
1721.5 ms * ∼38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (1297 - 1841, n=10)
1583 ms * ∼35% +8%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 11OnePlus 8 ProHuawei P40 ProGoogle Pixel 5Oppo Reno4 ProSamsung Galaxy S21+Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-15%
-16%
-55%
-44%
12%
-9%
-55%
Sequential Read 256KB
1614.92
1627.3
1%
1774.68
10%
851.37
-47%
943.36
-42%
1623.02
1%
1566 (1330 - 1730, n=18)
-3%
752 (41.9 - 2037, n=285, last 2 years)
-53%
Sequential Write 256KB
754.41
730.4
-3%
395.74
-48%
189.99
-75%
473.71
-37%
1037.14
37%
754 (527 - 1095, n=18)
0%
327 (11.9 - 1321, n=285, last 2 years)
-57%
Random Read 4KB
278.54
208.3
-25%
228.06
-18%
138.93
-50%
159.39
-43%
309.61
11%
236 (133 - 317, n=18)
-15%
134 (13.5 - 325, n=285, last 2 years)
-52%
Random Write 4KB
289.32
197.7
-32%
271.83
-6%
155.87
-46%
139.65
-52%
283.31
-2%
235 (121 - 306, n=18)
-19%
120 (4.97 - 330, n=285, last 2 years)
-59%
051015202530354045505560605560566058616060585958606049605960605660605960606160586061606055606157565860586060586056585657565960605860606061586060605760606057606060605858606060616060595960606060596060605660605960576160606060616056606055605660586160605859586060496059606056606059606061605860616060556061575658605860605860565856575659606058606060615860606057606060576060606058586060606160605959606060605960606056606059605761606060606160566060616060605960606060606060606060526060606060606058606061596060615960596059606159616059606060615960606059615957596060605960556056605861606058595860604960596060566060596060616058606160605560615756586058606058605658565756596060586060606158606060576060605760606060585860606061606059596060606059606060566060596057616060606061605660606160606059606060606060606060605260606060606060586060615960606159605960596061596160596060606159606060596159575960606059616060605960606060606061596059615861596160605860596060596060606060606060605960606059596159606160606060596059606060615860596055605660586160605859586060496059606056606059606061605860616060556061575658605860605860565856575659606058606060615860606057606060576060606058586060606160605959606060605960606056606059605761606060606160566060616060605960606060606060606060526060606060606058606061596060615960596059606159616059606060615960606059615957596060605961606060596060606060606159605961586159616060586059606059606060606060606060596060605959615960616060606059605960606061586059605960606060606058605360606060605560596160596060606059605960606060606060606059605960595961596060606060606060606060576060606061605960586060606060606060596060606060606059606060606060606059596060606060605560566058616060585958606049605960605660605960606160586061606055606157565860586060586056585657565960605860606061586060605760606057606060605858606060616060595960606060596060605660605960576160606060616056606061606060596060606060606060606052606060606060605860606159606061596059605960615961605960606061596060605961595759606060596160606059606060606060615960596158615961606058605960605960606060606060606059606060595961596061606060605960596060606158605960596060606060605860536060606060556059616059606060605960596060606060606060605960596059596159606060606060606060606057606060606160596058606060606060606059606060606060605960606060606060605959606060606040404040404040404040404040404040404040403941404040404039404040414040403940404040403940394139414040404040394041403940404039404140394040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040394140403941394040404040404041403940404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404039404060556056605861606058595860604960596060566060596060616058606160605560615756586058606058605658565756596060586060606158606060576060605760606060585860606061606059596060606059606060566060596057616060606061605660606160606059606060606060606060605260606060606060586060615960606159605960596061596160596060606159606060596159575960606059616060605960606060606061596059615861596160605860596060596060606060606060605960606059596159606160606060596059606060615860596059606060606060586053606060606055605961605960606060596059606060606060606060596059605959615960606060606060606060605760606060616059605860606060606060605960606060606060596060606060606060595960606060604040404040404040404040404040404040404040394140404040403940404041404040394040404040394039413941404040404039404140394040403940414039404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404039414040394139404040404040404140394040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040403940406160606061606060606160606060616060606160606060616060606160606060616060606157606061606060606160606061606060606160606060616060606160606060616060606160606060Tooltip
; Asphalt 9: Legends: Ø59.1 (49-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.7 (52-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59.8 (58-61)
; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (53-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø40 (39-41)
; Real Racing 3: Ø60.2 (57-61)
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Huawei P40 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
99.8 % ∼100% +11%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
94.7 % ∼95% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90.2 (5064min - 5613max) % ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65.8 (3805min - 5781max) % ∼66% -27%
Max. terhelés
 37 °C37.2 °C37.6 °C 
 36.7 °C37.1 °C36.3 °C 
 36.5 °C35.2 °C33.8 °C 
Maximum: 37.6 °C
Átlag: 36.4 °C
34 °C35.9 °C37.3 °C
32.5 °C35.8 °C37.5 °C
32.1 °C34.6 °C36 °C
Maximum: 37.5 °C
Átlag: 35.1 °C
Tápegység (max.)  27.5 °C | Szobahőmérséklet 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202634.52528.328.63123.329.24024.328.85033.936.46322.527.78022.525.910023.925.612517.23716019.948.920016.548.625013.350.931517.656.84002055.950019.66663023.268.680013.270.7100012.672.4125012.674.916001473.5200012.776.5250012.777.5315013.278.6400013.774.6500013.773.9630013.974.1800013.473.3100001474.61250014.768.81600015.763.2SPL27.386.8N0.967.5median 14median 70.7Delta2.79.12633.328.333.323.323.524.330.433.935.822.526.222.519.623.923.317.231.119.94716.550.513.353.517.6582060.419.664.223.267.513.271.512.673.612.678.51476.712.776.912.777.113.278.913.776.813.774.113.973.813.474.91475.114.769.515.758.527.387.80.971.6median 14median 71.52.710.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 11Samsung Galaxy S21+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S21+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energiafogyasztás
Kikapcsolt állapot / Készenlétdarklight 0.02 / 0.24 Watt
Üresjáratdarkmidlight 1.57 / 1.92 / 1.94 Watt
Terhelés midlight 6.32 / 11.65 Watt
 color bar
Kulcs: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Mi 11
4600 mAh
OnePlus 8 Pro
4510 mAh
Huawei P40 Pro
4200 mAh
Google Pixel 5
4080 mAh
Oppo Reno4 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21+
4800 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-33%
37%
58%
14%
27%
17%
21%
Idle Minimum *
1.57
2.2
-40%
0.92
41%
0.69
56%
0.95
39%
0.74
53%
1.065 (0.59 - 1.6, n=13)
32%
0.934 (0.37 - 2.5, n=234, last 2 years)
41%
Idle Average *
1.92
3.3
-72%
1.41
27%
0.82
57%
2.49
-30%
1.27
34%
1.597 (1.08 - 2, n=13)
17%
1.843 (0.65 - 3.94, n=234, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Maximum *
1.94
3.7
-91%
1.47
24%
0.85
56%
2.58
-33%
1.33
31%
1.777 (1.14 - 2.7, n=13)
8%
2.1 (0.69 - 4.2, n=234, last 2 years)
-8%
Load Average *
6.32
5.9
7%
3.35
47%
2.73
57%
3.52
44%
6.32
-0%
5.53 (4.21 - 6.44, n=13)
12%
4.46 (2.1 - 8.4, n=234, last 2 years)
29%
Load Maximum *
11.65
8.3
29%
6.37
45%
4.4
62%
5.9
49%
9.61
18%
10 (6.83 - 11.7, n=13)
14%
7.24 (3.16 - 12.3, n=234, last 2 years)
38%

* ... smaller is better

Akkumulátor üzemidő
Üresjárat (WLAN nélkül, minimális fényerő)
19h 04min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 11min
Terhelés (maximális fényerő)
3h 34min
Xiaomi Mi 11
4600 mAh
OnePlus 8 Pro
4510 mAh
Huawei P40 Pro
4200 mAh
Google Pixel 5
4080 mAh
Oppo Reno4 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21+
4800 mAh
Battery Runtime
51%
20%
64%
80%
33%
Reader / Idle
1144
2103
84%
1474
29%
2245
96%
1780
56%
H.264
971
1023
5%
1137
17%
1466
51%
1174
21%
WiFi v1.3
527
923
75%
743
41%
808
53%
950
80%
651
24%
Load
214
296
38%
198
-7%
333
56%
282
32%

Pro

+ nagyszerű OLED panel
+ nagyon jó hangszórók
+ nagy teljesítmény (jó hűtéssel)
+ formatervezés és kivitelezés
+ gyors töltés (vezetékes és vezeték nélküli)
+ jó kamera...

Kontra

- ...de nem csúcskategóriás
- nincs UHD opció az előlapi kamerában
- USB 2.0
- nincs IP minősítés
- kissé instabil WLAN
- időnként nagyon nagy hőtermelés
- átlag alatti üzemidő

Xiaomi Mi 11 összegzés - Még mindig nagyon vonzó a versenytársakhoz képest

In review: Xiaomi Mi 11. Test device provided by TradingShenzhen.
In review: Xiaomi Mi 11. Test device provided by TradingShenzhen.

A Mi sorozat legújabb szülötte egy nagyon jó okostelefon, de a Xiaomi zászlóshajó iránti elvárások is nőttek a tavaly óta beállított árazási stratégiával együtt. Annak ellenére, hogy egyes benchmark programokban nagyon erős a hőtermelés, ami (valószínűleg) nem fog nagy szerepet játszani a mindennapi használatban, a Mi 11-nek néhány területen van fejlődési lehetősége.

Nagyon jó, de sajnos már nem olcsó.

A Xiaomi telefon WLAN modemje elég akadozó, és nagy a fogyasztása, és emiatt az üzemidő nem optimális, és a kamera minősége is szoftverfrissítéseket igényelne. A Xiaomi talán kevésbé kellett volna itt a 108 MP-es kamera marketingjére fókuszáljon, mivel a Mi 10 Ultra 48 MP-es kamerája jobban tetszett a tesztünkben. Az IP tanúsítvány és az USB 2.0 szabvány hiánya valahogy nem illik a közel 800 eurós árhoz sem.

Ettől eltekintve a Mi 11 (még így is) sok mindent ad az áráért, főleg ahhoz képest, hogy mennyibe kerülnek a Galaxy S21 telefonok és azok funkciói. Mindenek felett, a nagyon világos, nagy felbontású AMOLED panel kombinálva a Xiaomi telefon gyorstöltési funkcióival ebben az árban ritkaságnak számít.

Ár és elérhetőség

A Widevine L1 és az LTE 20-as sáv, valamint a Kínában alacsony ár a Mi 11 CN verzióját ebben az évben nagyon vonzóvá teszik. A Mi 11 import árai 580 euró körül kezdődnek. Emellett a Xiaomi Mi 11 hivatalosan 2021 márciusában kerül az Egyesült Királyság piacaira. Aki az Egyesült Államokban van, ahol az okostelefon hivatalosan nem kapható, az hozzájuthat az online üzletekben, mint a newegg, Amazon or ebay.

Xiaomi Mi 11 - 02/19/2021 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Váz
88%
Billentyűzet
67 / 75 → 89%
Érintőpad
94%
Csatlakoztathatóság
56 / 70 → 80%
Súly
88%
Akkumulátor
87%
Kijelző
92%
Játékok alatti teljesítmény
63 / 64 → 99%
Alkalmazások alatti teljesítmény
83 / 86 → 97%
Hőmérséklet
91%
Zaj
100%
Audio
82 / 90 → 91%
Camera
70%
Átlag
82%
87%
Smartphone - Súlyozott átlag

Pricecompare

Stephanie Chamberlain
Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 364 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020
contact me via: LinkedIn
Ninh Duy
Translator: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 186446 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Magyarország - Kezdőlap > Tesztek / áttekintők > Xiaomi Mi 11 rövid értékelés: Erős zászlóshajó okostelefon korlátozásokkal
Marcus Herbrich, 2021-07- 1 (Update: 2021-07- 1)